How Does Talmudic Law Affect America?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

How Does Talmudic Law Affect America?

By Niki Raapana
Note from Niki Raapana on 4-13-09 -
 
The following "article" is a portion off my Talmudic Law research page at
the Anti-Communitarian League. http://nord.twu.net/acl/talmudiclaw.html.
 
It was submitted to Rense as a stand-alone article by an enthusiatic reader, not by me.
This particular section was written sometime between 2003 and 2006; it is not current information and does not represent
all the new information I have since accumulated. This "article" does not include my most recent conclusions.
I studied Talmudic Law as part of a bigger communitarian legal system, an emerging global justice system which seeks to
include Talmudic, Islamic, Buddhist, Mormon, Scottish Rite, Roman Catholic, Fundamental Christian, Imperial Roman,
Imperial British and ancient Babylonian beliefs and legal codes into the new world religion.
4-12-9
 

The First Ten Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are called the U.S. Bill of Rights. The law expressly forbids the establishment of a state church. This is the only legal rule of law in the United States. The original Bill of Rights is a ONE PAGE document. Any literate second-grader can read it. The Jewish-Egyptian Talmud is enormous, it includes mysticism and unwritten, hidden texts, and much of the discourse about it is only written in Hebrew and practiced in Eqyptian secret ceremonies that worship the Light Being.
 
Noson Gurary, a Lubavitch rabbi insists "Jewish law is the basis of our legal system in America," but that's not entirely true. Property Rights, Common Law, Natural Law, and the need to protect individuals from tyrants is the basis for the legal system in America. American law was designed to protect the people from their government. Jewish law is not American law, it's Israeli law. It's also a vast, ancient library that claims the Jews are God's "chosen people." It has another set of laws for non-Jews who must obey a complex set of confusing rules and regulations that give control over all daily life functions to an agent of the Jewish "court." Much like the religious "law" practiced by priests in the Holy Roman Empire and the Protestant Churches in Europe, Jewish law does not protect the rights and liberties of the common born man (as does U.S. law), it protects the rights of their elites to confiscate all private land and direct the lives of the people placed under their "care."
 
U.S. law is also based partially in American colonial understanding of the Old Testament and the amendment to that law, known as the New Testament. Jewish law was modified and changed by the Son of God Himself, known to world as Jesus Christ. Jewish law is not anywhere near the same as the principles for Christian Biblical law. Jesus spent a lot of time arguing against Jewish law. Christ challenged the authority of the Jewish rabbis and taught His followers a more peaceful path to Heaven. Old Testament Jews (and the early Catholic Church) regularly slaughtered their enemies (as directed by the vengeful God of the Old Testament) and brutally enforced their religious rules and laws against their common membership. Jesus was brutally tortured and crucified for breaking Jewish Law. (There is much Christian scholarship regarding Christ's discourse with the Pharisees. Bobby Garner's recent studies have uncovered many interesting aspects to these great "debates.")
 
The American founders (many of whom were devoutly religious freemasons) believed in a Universal Creator. The Creator of all life was called "God" by almost all of the American founders. They established every common man's inalienable right to pursue a happy life comes directly from God the moment man is born. Many founders further believed that only a nation based in Christian principles and the Ten Commandments could survive as a form of government designed to protect God-given, natural rights.
 
For two hundred years testimony in American courtrooms was sworn to be true with one hand over the heart and the other hand on a copy of the Christian Bible. "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?" Was the question asked by every American court. That's because almost all Americans are raised to understand (and obey) the Ten Commandments. Only a handful of Americans have any idea what the Talmud is. There are also only a handful of Jews who know all the laws included in the Talmud.
 
Let's repeat the above Bush quote again. "As we face new challenges and welcome new opportunities, our society must continue to promote good character and strong values. Through the study and teaching of Jewish law and philosophy you are contributing to a growing culture of service, citizenship, and responsibility in America," Bush wrote." This quote by Bush explains the "new" communitarian ideology of Americans' need for assigned, mandatory community service, the new requirements for American citizenship based only in communitarian values, and the new responsibility all Americans have to the emerging communitarian collective government. U.S. rule of law is rapidly changing on many different fronts.
 
Schools across our nation can no longer celebrate Christian holidays ("Merry Christmas" is considered politically incorrect.) All American children, including the Christians, are forced to worship the pagan Earth Goddess (Earth Day) in public schools. The U.N. International Court at the Hague is also home to the Temple of Understanding. Etzioni's new communitarian idea of "community spirit" is based in the Talmud, Hegel, and the theosophical ideas expressed by Madame Blavatsky and Alister Crowley. They, along with many other gurus, introduced Americans to the worship of Lucifer as the ultimate "light being." One Thousand Points of Light is a whole program based on Satanic "community oriented" principles. While I don't approve or condone these wacko belief systems, it was never a concern of mine if others practiced them, as long as they didn;t harm anyone as part of their creepy rituals. But in a communitarianized Amerika, we'll all be required to bow before a court enforcing Talmudic, communitarian laws.
 
In a recent CNN poll, over 80% of American respondents voted to keep the words "One nation under God" in the Pledge of Alliegance, and the words "In God We Trust" on Federal Reserve Notes. Yet, for some reason American justices of the peace can no longer hang the Ten Commandments in their halls of justice.
 
We find all this Talmudic Law "balancing" very amazing considering what's happened to Judge Moore who refused to follow a court ruling that decided he must remove a monument of the Ten Commandments in the Alabama state Supreme courthouse. In our layman's opinion, we think the Torah and the Biblical Old Testament are what most Christians understand to be Judaic law. Others tell us Judaism is not a religion, it is law religionized. The Talmud is the controversy, even though Judaic-Talmudic law includes several books that include the Old Testament-Torah. Not only was the Old Testament "word of God" modified and edited by scholars throughout the centuries, portions of the Talmud were never written down, they contained secrets passed orally only to elite initiates (much like Freemasonry). As with the Christians and the many very different denominations that represent it, the Torah-Talmud is also an area of contention among the varieties of Jewish people. The key factor to Talmudic law is that it is not fixed law, it is constantly challenged and rewritten, according to case law precepts. And, unlike the Christian arguments, anyone who objects to the overall authority of Talmudic law, or even portions of it, is labeled anti-Semitic (<http://jwd-jewishwatchdog.home.comcast.net/alerts/jwd_10-antiisraelijews.html>even the Jews). Many American Jews do not even <http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=5301>identify with Judaism. It's also important to know most Jews did not orignially support Zionism. Today, opposition to political Zionism and/or the religious Talmudic laws are condemmed as a racist attitiude toward Jewish people and are subject to criminal prosecution in a growing number of countries.
 
Why is the international community adopting it as part of their emerging global to local law enforcement? The affects of imposing a law nobody understands are staggering.
http://nord.twu.net/acl/commlaw.html - Communitarian Law vs European Community Law : Individual & National Sovereignty versus "the Collective Good"
http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/
http://www.newswithviews.com/Raapana/niki4.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPW5rC-chDU
http://www.nikiraapana.com/

http://www.rense.com/general85/dere.htm

[Wimpy]

Occasionally I flip the TV to "The O'Reilly Report" on Faux News and the other evening (wed. or Thurs. 8/25, 8/26) his semi-regular guest Dick Morris-Ass Clown appears.  In his usual smug manner, Morris tosses out that the Koran teaches violence and uses this 'fact' as another reason to oppose the Ground Zero Mosque - the current news hype of the day.

Suddenly Morris blurts out that the unlike the Koran, the Talmud has only "PEACEFUL" teachings!  I do believe that was the first time I ever heard the "Talmud" mentioned on a prime time cable news show.

I was flabbergasted.  We know this claim of 'peaceful and Talmud' is a blatant lie but more astonishing is that the controlled opposition is now going mainstream to apparently quell the growing sentiments against Jews and Israel.  I sense desperation and a new talking point:  Peace Through Talmud Teachings.  Step up all Ye Evangelicals!

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Occasionally I flip the TV to "The O'Reilly Report" on Faux News and the other evening (wed. or Thurs. 8/25, 8/26) his semi-regular guest Dick Morris-Ass Clown appears.  In his usual smug manner, Morris tosses out that the Koran teaches violence and uses this 'fact' as another reason to oppose the Ground Zero Mosque - the current news hype of the day.

Suddenly Morris blurts out that the unlike the Koran, the Talmud has only "PEACEFUL" teachings!  I do believe that was the first time I ever heard the "Talmud" mentioned on a prime time cable news show.

I was flabbergasted.  We know this claim of 'peaceful and Talmud' is a blatant lie but more astonishing is that the controlled opposition is now going mainstream to apparently quell the growing sentiments against Jews and Israel.  I sense desperation and a new talking point:  Peace Through Talmud Teachings.  Step up all Ye Evangelicals!

Yeah Wimpy,

The Talmudic "cat" is out of the bag and now they are trying to make it a playful "kitty" rather than some other insane, rabid animal.

[§N9sh2bj]

I can't follow the author CSR posted, because it is meandering and confusing.
It might get better more paragraphs down than I read, but I can't waste my time on it. There are better things to do.
Tens of thousands of little members of our family perishing a day, and she writes this?  :roll:

It has another set of laws for non-Jews who must obey a complex set of confusing rules and regulations that give control over all daily life functions to an agent of the Jewish "court."

Sounds like UNITED STATES FEDERAL Code today. What she keeps claiming is 'U.S. law'. If you want to claim a system of Codes can use the word 'law', it doesn't overturn what she is describing is right now, today, and has been for some time. What bubble does she live in?

This is the only legal rule of law in the United States.

?  :?

The Jewish-Egyptian Talmud is enormous, it includes mysticism and unwritten, hidden texts, and much of the discourse about it is only written in Hebrew and practiced in Eqyptian secret ceremonies that worship the Light Being.

Correct. This is why it is called Codes. Because it's written in codes. And 'you have to be a 'high priest' to decipher it', according to them anyway.

Noson Gurary, a Lubavitch rabbi

 is it me or do their names get weirder?

insists "Jewish law is the basis of our legal system in America," but that's not entirely true. Property Rights, Common Law, Natural Law, and the need to protect individuals from tyrants is the basis for the legal system in America.

Sorry, sweet-cakes. Hasn't been that way for about 70-80 years, since the last bankruptcy cycle.
Where have you been?

American law was designed to protect the people from their government.

No. See above.
If you are talking about rules drafted shortly after the american revolution, those are specifically designed to constrain government, and to that, the federal government. Not protect the people. The people have un-a-lien-able rights (they can't be liened), yes, but they didn't come from the documents, they came from the creator. The document only acknowledges what was widely known to already exist. A constitutor is one who transfers debt from one Party, to another Party. That's what the constitution was about, 'We the People', them, not the people. The mere process of capitalizing the word 'people' changed the meaning to those signing the document. I know of no one alive today who signed it.

Jesus spent a lot of time arguing against Jewish law.

Well, that's as far as I got. I believe it's more correct to say he did something far more powerful and subtle then arguing.

[targa2]

American law was not necessarily designed to protect the people .  Law is simply a platform designed to set the rules of conduct for various adherents within the jurisdictions that people allow themselves to pledge their allegiance to.
For example the subject of " rights ".  You only have the rights that you can articulate in a courtroom. Therefore , if you do not a) understand your rights and b ) know when and where they apply and c ) apply them in a courtroom in person ..... then you have none.  The law itself is , in effect, neutral. Until you take hold of it and " steer it " in the direction you want it to go, it is idle .

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Actually §N9sh2bj, this is just an example of the crap that most Jews in the Legal profession spew everyday. It is insane.

[kolnidre]

To be fair, I think Niki Raapana has come a long way since this was written, admittedly between 2003 and 2006 as she wrotes above.

Her research into Communitarianism has uncovered how the global "sustainability" agenda uses contract law to institute its policies from the local community up. Her personal experiences in Seattle and Alaska have made it very clear to her that government was never established to protect the interests of the people with a small "p," but to outline a system to in fact preserve the wealth of the property holders that contracted together to establish their respective jurisdictions.

Everything works on contracts and legal codes. That's where the Talmud, with its endless codes, provides the model.

[targa2]

Yes, everything works on contracts and legal codes but this is not unique to Talmudic law.  The difference with Talmudic Law is that , historically ,it has one very subtle difference with regards to the ownership of property.  The Jews , being aliens in any country they resided,and unable to own land, had to find a system by which they could attach a debt obligation to landowners, so they created a form of lien which could attach ownership to a piece of property which another was living on.  This what happened when the Normans brought the Jews back to England after the Norman Conquest.  They started implimenting this lien process to satisfy loan debts against land-holders.  It upset the entire system of Britain at that time.  It has become part of the Common Law/ Law Merchant which is the basis for the entire western civilizations legal system.

It's the Trojan Horse ( or one of many ) that followed the expansion of the British Empire to this very day.

[§N9sh2bj]

good call.

and that lien on the property is split. the equitable title the County or State corporation has, such as 'STATE OF ALABAMA' (the County corporation is a subsidiary), and the legal title the 'property user' has. The property taxes are rental fees. Any arrangement the property user has between the bank and himself to pay the bank additional sums after the initial settlement (the promissory note) has nothing to do with the additional 'rental fees' he pays as taxes. Although it is one big conspiracy to deprive people of the land.

There is also a difference between the 'improvements on the land' and the land itself.

[911thology]

Hi to everyone. I think that the so-called 'Talmudic' Law (to be more precise 'its total absence') affects America in a very obvious way - just look at the Egyptian pyramid boldly depicted by your masters on their one-dollar bill. And then read the Commandment No.1 that starts as follows: "I am Jehovah your God, Who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery..." The Freemasons brought you back to Egypt, back to the land of slavery by abolishing the Law of Moses and that is the way how the so-called 'Talmudic' Law (I mean its absence) affects you - you are no longer slaves of the God Most High, but rather slaves of the Freemasons who forced you to abide under their so-called 'laws', instead. Just remember that Biblical Pharaoh was collecting only 20% from his slaves those days (while God's law limits this to 10% only). And not calculate how much you pay to the Freemasons today. Then look again at the Egyptian pyramid on your 1 dollar bill and make further conclusions. When it comes to so-called 'sons of God' who allegedly 'abolished the Law of God' I suggest you better read the Bible - especially Matthew 5:17-20. And when it comes to (I quote) 'the vengeful God of the Old Testament' - you will have a real chance to test His vengefulness when you appear before the Highest Court (and it will happen soon, don't even doubt it - no mortal would be able to live over 120 years in any case). So, you better don't joke with legal definitions while still Here...