NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg Next Treasury Secretary

[MikeWB]

Goyim just can''t get a break in government finance  

Serious Insider' Tells CNBC's Kudlow NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg Next Treasury Secretary
'The Call' co-host says Rouse replacing Rahm a signal White House 'not reaching out to business,' 'nothing going to change.'

 By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute
10/2/2010 8:57:09 AM

 

With what appears to be a devastating election looming for his party, is President Obama attempting to follow in the footsteps of one of his predecessors and moderate toward the center?
 
Not if choosing Pete Rouse to replace chief of staff Rahm Emanuel is any indication,  according to CNBC's Larry Kudlow. On the Oct. 1 broadcast of "The Call," CNBC Washington correspondent John Harwood predicted Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner wasn't going anywhere, but Obama would take a pro-business tack with the leadership of Department of Commerce.

 However, Kudlow, citing a "deep political insider," had a different forecast.
 
"The Commerce thing is a great idea and you're probably going to be right, but I know that you don't hear this," Kudlow said. "But I had dinner last night with a deep political insider who told me that Michael Bloomberg is the next Treasury secretary. I heard that. All I'll say is this is a serious insider who said the deal has been done and that Bloomberg is the next Treasury secretary."
 
If true, Bloomberg is an interesting choice, but he's hardly a conservative. In fact, the New York mayor took a swipe at the Tea Party movement earlier in the day on WOR radio in New York, calling it "irrational" and declared it was "not a political movement."
 
Earlier on "The Call," which had been interrupted by the White House's announcement that Emanuel was departing, Kudlow declared the move wasn't one that signified a pro-business moderation, as the Clinton administration exhibited.
 
"There is no change going on here," Kudlow said. "John Harwood look, you had in the Clinton administration – you had senior business people as chief of staff. I'm going to name two – Mack McLarty, who ran the oil and gas company in Arkansas, and Erskine Bowles, who was a distinguished Southern banker and businessman. Now we don't see any movement whatsoever. This fellow, Pete Rouse – I don't know him. He's an inside guy from the liberal side of the Senate. They're not reaching out to the world of business. Nothing's going to change. There's no policy impact. The liberal vision that [Reuters columnist] Jimmy Pethokoukis mentioned, that's what's getting spanked in this election, isn't it John?"

[Fester]

Bloomberg is filthy and would make a fine performing pig for those low-level Rothschilds.  May I add a little on the sage Larry Kudlow.  Never forgot the barking supply-sider burned out his septum snorting blow in the 1980s.  Maybe the rebuilt schnoz is a better truth seeking device.  Didn't know what a "scholar" he was or that he made his bones working for the Fed  Seems to know and have practiced many of the tribal dance routines:

Known as "Kuddles" to friends, he was a star on the tennis team and a member of the left-wing SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) at Rochester. In 1970, Kudlow joined Joseph Duffey's "New Politics" senatorial campaign in Connecticut. Duffey was a leading anti-war politician during the Vietnam war era. Kudlow, working with Yale student Bill Clinton as well as many other rising young democrats, was known as a "brilliant" district coordinator. In 1971, Kudlow attended Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Ankle Grabbing Affairs :up: , where he studied politics and "economics" but left before earning a masters degree.[3]

Kudlow began his career as a Staff Economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. He worked in a division of that bank that handled open market operations, which involve buying and selling bonds to help control inflation and interest rates. In 1970 , when he was still a Democrat he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of Joseph Duffey along with Bill Clinton, John Podesta, and Michael Medved, another future conservative, and in 1976 he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of Daniel Patrick Moynihan along with Tim Russert against Conservative Party incumbent James L. Buckley, brother of William F. Buckley, Jr.[4]

During the first term of the Reagan administration (1981–1985), Kudlow served as Associate Director for Economics and Planning in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which belongs to the Executive Office of the President. While he worked at the OMB, Kudlow was also the Washington, D.C., reporter of CNN's news program Business Morning, and an Advisory Committee member of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, more commonly known as Freddie Mac.[citation needed] In April 2005, New York governor George Pataki included Kudlow in a six-member state tax commission.

In 1987 Kudlow was rehired by Bear Stearns  as their chief economist and senior managing director. He was fired in 1994 after his substance abuse resulted in him missing an important client presentation.[9] He also served as an economic counsel to A.B. Laffer & Associates, which is the San Diego, California, company of Arthur Laffer, a major supply-side economist and creator of the Laffer curve, an economic theory tying lower taxation levels to increased government revenues, at least at some taxation rates.

He was a member of the board of directors of Empower America, a supply-side economics organization founded in 1993 and merged in 2004 with the Citizens for a Sound Economy to form FreedomWorks. Kudlow is also consulting chief economist for American Skandia Life Assurance, Inc., in Connecticut, a subsidiary of insurance giant Prudential Financial.

Kudlow converted to Catholicism and entered a twelve-step program to deal with his addictions to cocaine and alcohol in the mid-1990s.

Here's Eustace Mullins' on what the Fed's "open market operations" can do for a nation"

In 1914, Federal Reserve Bank rates had dropped from six percent to four percent, had gone to a further low of three percent in 1916, and had stayed at that level until 1920. The reason for the low interest rate was the necessity for floating the billion dollar Liberty Loans. At the beginning of each Liberty Loan Drive, the Federal Reserve Board put a hundred million dollars into the New York money market through its open market operations, in order to provide a cash impetus for the drive. The most important role of the Liberty Bonds was to soak up the increase in circulation of the medium of exchange (integer of account) brought about by the large amount of currency and credit put out during the war. Laborers were paid high wages, and farmers received the highest prices for their produce they had ever known. These two groups accumulated millions of dollars in cash which they did not put into Liberty Bonds. That money was effectively out of the hands of the Wall Street group which controlled the money and credit of the United States. They wanted it back, and that is why we had the Agricultural Depression of 1920-21.

Much of the money was deposited in small country banks in the Middle West and West which had refused to have any part of the Federal Reserve System, the farmers and ranchers of those regions seeing no good reason why they should give a group of international financiers control of their money. The main job of the Federal Reserve System was to break these small country banks and get back the money which had been paid out to the farmers during the war, in effect, ruin them, and this it proceeded to do.

First of all, a Federal Farm Loan Board was set up which encouraged the farmers to invest their accrued money in land on long term loans, which the farmers were eager to do. Then inflation was allowed to take its course in this country and in Europe in 1919 and 1920. The purpose of the inflation in Europe was to cancel out a large portion of the war debts owed by the Allies to the American people, and its purpose in this country was to draw in the excess moneys which had been distributed to the working people in the form of higher wages and bonuses for production. As prices went higher and higher, the money which the workers had accumulated became worth less and less, inflicting upon them an unfair drain, while the propertied classes were enriched by the inflation because of the enormous increase in the value of land and manufactured goods. The workers were thus effectively impoverished, but the farmers, who were as a class more thrifty, and who were more self-sufficient, had to be handled more harshly.

G.W. Norris, in "Collier's Magazine" of March 20, 1920, said:

"Rumor has it that two members of the Federal Reserve Board had a plain talk with some New York bankers and financiers in December, 1919. Immediately afterwards, there was a notable decline in transactions on the stock market and a cessation of company promotions. It is understood that action in the same general direction has already been taken in other sections of the country, as evidence of the abuse of the Federal Reserve System to promote speculation in land and commodities appeared."

Senator Robert L. Owen, Chairman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, testified at the Senate Silver Hearings in 1939 that:

"In the early part of 1920, the farmers were exceedingly prosperous. They were paying off the mortgages and buying a lot of new land, at the instance of the Government--had borrowed money to do it--and then they were bankrupted by a sudden contraction of credit and currency which took place in 1920. What took place in 1920 was just the reverse of what should have been taking place. Instead of liquidating the excess of credits created by the war through a period of years, the Federal Reserve Board met in a meeting which was not disclosed to the public. They met on the 8th of May, 1920, and it was a secret meeting. They spent all day conferring; the minutes made sixty printed pages, and they appear in Senate Document 310 of February 19, 1923. The Class A Directors, the Federal Reserve Advisory Council, were present, but the Class B Directors, who represented business, commerce, and agriculture, were not present. The Class C Directors, representing the people of the United States, were not present and were not invited to be present.

Only the big bankers were there, and their work of that day resulted in a contraction of credit which had the effect the next year of reducing the national income fifteen billion dollars, throwing millions of people out of employment, and reducing the value of lands and ranches by twenty billion dollars."

[Androgynus]

Very very very difficult to rationally deny or explain away what NYC Mayor Bloomberg's--or what (the eventually to become) Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel's ongoing "public involvement and service" actually symbolize...a national/regional functional governance.

So, along with other similar-upper-class rich Israeli-eligible dual-citizenship Zionists (including those majority-controlling the FED, Hollywood, Wall Street, and most American print/electronic media, etc.)... The United States of America realistically functions under defacto Israeli governance...and, as with any other governing structure--from time to time, the governing personnel get re-positioned from one overseeing bureaucracy to another....

Hard to honestly rationalize also, how so much exclusive, concentrated governing political and economic power can be subject to any higher hidden control or direction--other than those actually exercising the defacto governance...

~~A~~

[Androgynus]

It would be not unreasonable to describe Mayor Bloomberg's three succeeding mayoral victories as quite heavily invested or outright bought efforts...and each succeeding political "victory" costing more than his previous...

His most recent electoral "victory" tilting at officially US $102 million dollars (or $174 per vote) in the 2009 mayoral bid.

Either a financially Insane benevolent sacrifice for the dubious "privilege of public service"...or, (more realistically) just part of the insurance costs for maneuvering into the right position to eventually control hundreds of trillion$.

~~A~~

Bloomberg Spent $102 Million on New York Mayoral Election - NYTimes.com:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/28/nyreg ... .html?_r=1

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Keep in mind that "Global Jewry" is looking for one of the "chosen" to become a US Presidential Candidate... Obama's election was a step in the path to a Full Fledged Jewish President of the United States.

Bloomberg is perceived as a "neutral" and "can-do" type of persona. Like any Jew (or Jew puppet) running for high office, they'll have the Jewish press just blab forever -- on and on about him.. from mouth pieces like  Koke-Head-Kudlow.  (Thanks for sharing those facts Fester, I had no idea about that one...  :shock: )

So after Obama, comes their "Chosen" Jew President... and another paragraph in the "Fulfillment of the Protocols" is written by the Talmudic-Babylonian J-Team to the detriment of Human civilization.