The Neanderthal hypothesis

[pas]

This was posted on John Kaminski's site.

I've heard J.A.M. talk about this but it seemed a bit far fetched to me at the time and i didn't research the subject.
But now J.K. is 'promoting' this, i was wondering how T.I.U-members view this.

(If it's already discussed, sorry for asking but my searches only gives 'errors')




The Neanderthal hypothesis

If it's true, then war is inevitable, and it's long past time to fight

23rd August 2010


The whole world is puzzled by the undisguised insanity that seems to pervert and pollute every news story in the world. Why would they deliberately poison the ocean? Why would they bomb innocent countries? Why do they poison food, foul the air, and produce supposedly beneficial medicines that, when studied carefully, always seem to contain hidden, time-delayed poisons?

Why are they deliberately trying to kill our own children?

But before the why comes the who. Many of us have spent decades trying to identify the perpetrators, and a lot of us think we have a pretty good idea who is behind all these contrived atrocities that have ruined our lives down through the centuries.

Among the greatest exposers of these tragedies have been Jewish turncoat writers, who betrayed their own sick dogma to prove they were human beings, too.

Benjamin Freedman, in his famous 1961 Willard Hotel speech, still has written the best description of why World War I started. Arthur Koestler made famous the notion that Jews were not Hebrews, they were Russians and other assorted Yiddish Eastern Europeans. More recently, Shlomo Sand has convincingly detailed how there was no Jewish culture to begin with, and how it was cobbled together from cutthroat refugees from around the world, and an entire history of Judaism was created out of sadistic fantasy that now strangles the world with its bogus and misdirected hatred.

But another Jew, one my age and our generation, Michael Bradley, may just exceed these humane Jewish-human patriots with the scope and profundity his stunning hypothesis.

Jews are the remnants of the Neanderthals, he says, nearly rubbed out by the CroMagnons 7500 years ago, and nursing a deathless hatred of their enemies, who today are all the non Jews of the world.

Bradley, a Jewish writer, warns us:

"It is time for the non-Semitic peoples of the world to come together in a multi-racial alliance under one banner in order to severely limit Semitic activities before they put an end to us and everything else on the planet. . . . However, I will warn everyone that it may well be too late."

In two astonishing books, Bradley writes of the CroMagnon slaughter of Neanderthals c. 5600 BC. Remnants of the nearly extincted hunchbacks retreated to deep in the impenetrable mountains of the Caucasus, where their vengeful retribution has been felt in every area of human endeavor ever since.

Bradley figures monotheism is a Neanderthal plot to more efficiently control the people who are targeted as the hosts of their parasitic perversities, with the implication that all of human civilization has been influenced by the predispositions of Neanderthal DNA.

DNA samples prove that Semitic populations are possessed of up to 70 percent of Neanderthal DNA, which accounts for why what is now the nation of Israel has been the epicenter of world violence since most ancient times, Bradley concludes.

He insists that today's Jews who are plundering the world on every level of reality and calls for a multi-racial analysis of this thoroughly perfidious group, which is now busy destroying the world by its control of money and all the governments of the world.

"This is precisely what I argued in The Iceman Inheritance (1978), Chosen People from the Caucasus (1992) and what Erik Trinkaus at least inferred in his The Neandertals of 1992. However, my own calculations indicate that some Middle East Semitic populations approach 50 percent Neanderthal and in some very specific small areas, 70 percent Neanderthal. Given the usually modest Semitic populations in mountain valleys and arid landscapes of the Caucasus Middle East, this sort of Neanderthal DNA concentration among some groups would not affect that "1 to 4 percent" of the total world population very much."

On his website, Bradley presents an astonishing conclusion:

"In my view, there are two major subspecies of technical 'humanity' presently contending for the domination of our world. "

"Their "chosen people" pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined "us against them" mentality. Their higher level of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social influence wherever they have settled in the West. . . . The Ashkenazi Jews, as a group, exhibit lingering Neanderthal traits most strongly among living Caucasians because of Jewish prohibitions against marriage with outsiders. Their Neanderthal genes have been kept "all in the family", as it were. These Neanderthal genes were not diluted by intermarriage nearly as much as with most other Caucasians."

According to Bradley, the Neanderthal heritage of modern- day Jewish people explains much about their ongoing problems with not only the native people of Palestine but with other people on the planet. He writes:

"This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward emotional instability and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened . . . which is all the time when they are not in absolute control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then. An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot (yet) control death. This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over the course of Western history. Their aggression encourages continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while the emotional instability makes it difficult for most Jews to distinguish reasonably between justified social criticism by their non- Jewish neighbors and attacks."

"Insensitive even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence in societies, and reacting with hysterical aggression to any such supposed "attack" on their behavior and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have always provoked violence against themselves. And then they, with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and attribute the situation to innate "anti-Semitism" among their neighbors."

For more about his work (and the availability of his books on the origins of the Neanderthals, as well as other topics), refer to Bradley's website at michaelbradley.info

or write him:
Michael Bradley,
PO Box 97035,
Toronto,
Canada M6R 3LO

or email him at: michaelbradley2003@ yahoo.com.

For a copy of  Thirteenth Tribe (softcover, 255 pages, #61, $17 plus $5 S & H)
contact:
TBR BOOK CLUB,
P.O. Box 15877,
Washington,
D.C. 20003.
Call 1-877-773-9077 toll free to charge.

In essence, the Barnes Review concluded:

Bradley contends that people and cultures emerging from the Caucasus Mountains (a known refuge of late lingering Neanderthal populations) in proto-historical and historical times would have remained highly intelligent, highly aggressive and psychosexually maladapted (promoting a high level of in-group cohesion). These traits, Bradley contends, explain the survival of Biblical Hebrews against all odds and also the inordinate social influence of modern Western Jews.

Bradley contends that there is no mystique of "the chosen people." "Monotheism"— a purely male and abstract Godhead— is merely a result of Neanderthal glacial physical and mental adaptations or "maladaptations." Proven Neanderthal in-group cohesion and extreme aggression together resulted in a fiercely parochial "chosen people" perspective. The cultural fusion of the two separate streams of "Jews" has, since the 16th century, played an important role in the evolution of Western Civilization and thus in the molding of the entire world's present cultural profile.

Bradley contends that a uniquely high level of lingering Neanderthal aggression, perpetuated by ethnic prohibitions against outside marriage, has been responsible for the major role played by those calling themselves Jews in the discovery and conquest of the Americas, the transatlantic trade in Black Africans as slaves and cultural colonization of non-Whites by the West. It has been a role too often distorted and disguised by loud lamentations of "anti-Semitism."


To me, this an formidable example of a Jew writing like a human being in the remarkable tradition of Freedman, Koestler and Sand.

But the implications of another actual species out to exterminate its millennia old enemy — perhaps this is Pindar's original Penalty of an Ancient Grief — evidenced by all of the wreckage of a sabotaged civilization — means something dire.

When a predator — especially a superior one — is out to exterminate every last one of its competitors, it means that no peaceful solution is possible. One need only contemplate the daily condition of the world, mutilated as it is by what Bradley calls the savage neanderthal heritage of today's Jewish puppetmasters.

The implications of the Neanderthal hypothesis are that no peaceful process of reclaiming the world from the Jews is possible.

[Wimpy]

Mr. Bradley seems to be the only person around claiming Neanderthal existed more current than 25,000 years ago -  he is nearly 20,000 years off all accepted evidence.  It would be interesting to see what his scientific basis for the claim  and, no, I am not going to contact him since the rest of his thesis is also totally unproved.

I would proffer that Jews, like  Christian Biblical archeologists, try their best to fit archeological evidence into "their" religious inception dates.  Not too surprised to see that the 5,600 BC corresponds closely with Biblical claims. :roll:

I 'm afraid that this grand story is just a story and I suspect the historical truth is much simpler:  The Jew tribe have always been greedy, lying, psychopathic, ultra-vindictive and murderous assholes,...collectively.  I don't need to consider some Jew's contrived justification for explaining away their behavior as payback for some CroMagnon/Neanderthal mystical battle.

[pas]

Wimpy:
I would proffer that Jews, like Christian Biblical archeologists, try their best to fit archeological evidence into "their" religious inception dates. Not too surprised to see that the 5,600 BC corresponds closely with Biblical claims.

I 'm afraid that this grand story is just a story and I suspect the historical truth is much simpler: The Jew tribe have always been greedy, lying, psychopathic, ultra-vindictive and murderous assholes,...collectively. I don't need to consider some Jew's contrived justification for explaining away their behavior as payback for some CroMagnon/Neanderthal mystical battle.

I fully agree with that.
It is strange though, that Kaminski lists Bradley amongst the likes of B. Freedman, A. Koestler and S. Sand.

[Wimpy]

"COWBOY JESUS" REVIVAL OR ZIONIST COLLABORATOR PICNIC?

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

There is a certain absurdity for a group only remotely related to Christianity calling for a "revival of the Christian faith" in a New York rally, led by "Cowboy Jesus" freak Glenn Beck.  Beck, whose claimed religious beliefs are based on Mormonism, an offshoot of Christianity originally based on polygamy and closely resembling the Islamic Shia sect, predominate in modern day Iran, is one of the top entertainers of Israeli-American Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.

However, most followers of current "political hate theology" are "Christian Zionists.  Christian Zionists consider themselves a form of evangelical Christianity but differ strongly in the role of Jesus Christ as "savior."  Their Jesus didn't come to America to live among the Native Americans nor is he the Jesus of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.  Melding two religions, one meant to venerate Christ and another based on despising him has created an abomination.

Christian Zionism is a form of defacto form of Judaism with Christ taking a secondary role as "savior," as accepted in the traditional Christian concept of the 'trinity."  Christ, according to Christian Zionist beliefs, acts as an arbiter of  judgement more closely associated with Hasatan (Ha-Satan, the "challenger" or "accuser") as described in Job 1:6-12.  The "adversary" of the Judaic texts, subservient to G-d is an analog to the "Christ" figure in Christian Zionism, a figure associated with war, pestilence and suffering.  Christian Zionism and its "Luciferian" Christ is a philosophical construct of "new age" mythologies of space aliens, the Bermuda Triangle with a touch of Revelations for dramatic effect.

In that sense, Christian Zionism has bridged a gulf, not with Judaism but with Satanism.

Lord of the Rings is more closely aligned with the teachings in the gospels.

What Beck and his cronies try to keep from the "star wars" religious sects they pander to is that their special brew of race fear, sexual humiliation and science fiction isn't even a real front for support of Israel or the rule of America by the 1.4% Jewish population that they consider "genetically superior" to Christians.  The subtext "master race" theory that, to "conservatives" explains, to them at least, the predominance of Israeli citizens or Jewish American Zionists in an unbelievable percentage of positions of control, not only in government and the media but with a virtual stranglehold on the American banking and economic system as well, exceeds Hitler and Himmler's wildest dreams.

With all the praying and wailing and Glenn Beck's prolific tears, the addict and Fox News demagogue, minor noise-making clown prince of his Rothschild masters, the banking firm in control of the Federal Reserve and all other western currencies as well, the true aspect of this primitive spectacle was obvious.  Several thousand morally confused and religiously misguided Americans, feeling abandoned by their government and spiritual institutions now fallen into disrepute, clearly demonstrated how easily Americans could be manipulated.  Israeli Prime Minister Bibi "Furniture-man" Netanyahu continually jokes about this in both public and private.

With proof coming to light in the past few days that the Tea Party movement is not only funded but was originated by a reclusive Israeli-American billionaire and the Fox/"Ground Zero Mosque" scandal, Netanyaho seems on sound footing.

Beck has demanded, for weeks, to know who is secretly funding the "Victory" Mosque that he insists is an offense to victims of "9/11."

Glenn only needs to look at the name on his paycheck.

Beck and his followers serve another important purpose, "living proof" of the racial superiority of Jews.  With recent studies showing Jews to be a race distinctive from European Caucasians, reputed by some studies to have much higher percentages of Neandrathal genes, the concepts as presented by Zionists that Jews are more clever and aggressive than "whites" is one more suited to the Third Reich than the modern world.

More curious, indeed, is the fact that the concepts of racial purity with roots, not 5000 years ago, but 50,000, are inconsistent with the beliefs of Christian Zionists who profess than all mankind came from a single common ancestor 5000 years ago.  In accordance with the teachings of "creationists," all mankind would share equally in the exact same genetics as Adam and Eve, though Zionists insist their race was totally distinct from others by that time.

This speaks to the heart of the matter and the heart of the beliefs of Beck and his confidants.  Christians, if not children of Adam and Eve, as is supported by the Torah, "Goyim," are not, as such human.

Thus, the basis of Christian Zionism and "creationism" is the establishment of a belief system that enslavement of peoples, as may be witnessed by the political and social restructuring of recent years is based on mythical scriptural interpretations, "creationist theory" that proves Christians to be a form of animal, less than human, not made in the "image of G-d."

Thus, the concepts of the "elect" are not meant to reflect a group chosen out of mankind as righteous or deserving of salvation but of a class of mammal or "cattle" that are, by a form of divine selection elevated to human status.

Where the Torah describes, ad nauseum, how rights and protections afforded humans are to be withheld from other ethnic groups, it has taken Christian Zionism to define through "creationism" and a radical reassessment of the divinity of Christ to clarify the status of Christians and other non-Jews as proto-humans.

In an almost bizarre twist of events, a political movement melding bizarre cults based on alien lifeforms, "Cowboy Jesus" and the pseudo-science of 'creationism" can, on one hand, build a consensus based on the concept of inferiority of non-white races and, at the same time, herald itself as a sub-human race petitioning Zion for inclusion in an afterlife.

And so it goes...

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/08/29 ... feriority/

Pas, I've been seeing this Meme lately.  I "bolded" the two paragraphs in the above Gordon Duff article to illustrate another aspect of this Bradley book.  The Jews are now pushing the acceptance of their superiority because SOMEHOW Neanderthal man was smarter, more clever, bigger brained,...ad nausea, And, since it is now shown through DNA that there WAS mixing and that Jews have more Neanderthal DNA...blah, blah, blah.

The fact is there are no facts!!  Pure and flagrant speculation based upon very weak evidence.  This is typical of Jewish indoctrination and that is to fool the simple uneducated with what could be perceived as intelligence.  They have been at this game for centuries and the ignorant typically fall for this crap hook line and sinker.  

I fully expect this theme to gain more main stream discussion.  Unfortunately it won't be a scientifically critical dialogue but rather  people accepting the unprovable hogwash that Neanderthal Man was absolutely superior to CroMagnon and therefore we should all take a bow to the bigger brained and more superior Jew.  It is -after all- science.

[pas]

Wimpy, thank you for your explaination.

This theory always smelled kinda fishy to me, so it surprised me that John Kaminski came with this.An honest mistake i think (and definately hope).
But anyway thanks for clearing it up to me, because your view makes alot more sense.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Some new info and ideas.... always keep in mind the Toba Volcano explosion as something which shaped early history:

Lost Civilization May Have Existed Beneath the Persian Gulf

By Jeanna Bryner, LiveScience Managing Editor

posted: 09 December 2010 01:01 pm ET



This map reveals the Arabian Peninsula with regions that were exposed as sea levels fell, and so became environmental refuges, possibly for some of the earliest humans out of Africa. Credit: Current Anthropology.





persian gulf map
    This map reveals the Arabian Peninsula with regions that were exposed as sea levels fell, and so became environmental refuges, possibly for some of the earliest humans out of Africa. Credit: Current Anthropology.

Veiled beneath the Persian Gulf, a once-fertile landmass may have supported some of the earliest humans outside Africa some 75,000 to 100,000 years ago, a new review of research suggests.

At its peak, the floodplain now below the Gulf would have been about the size of Great Britain, and then shrank as water began to flood the area. Then, about 8,000 years ago, the land would have been swallowed up by the Indian Ocean, the review scientist said.

The study, which is detailed in the December issue of the journal Current Anthropology, has broad implications for aspects of human history. For instance, scientists have debated over when early modern humans exited Africa, with dates as early as 125,000 years ago and as recent as 60,000 years ago (the more recent date is the currently accepted paradigm), according to study researcher Jeffrey Rose, an archaeologist at the University of Birmingham in the U.K.

"I think Jeff's theory is bold and imaginative, and hopefully will shake things up," Robert Carter of Oxford Brookes University in the U.K. told LiveScience. "It would completely rewrite our understanding of the out-of-Africa migration. It is far from proven, but Jeff and others will be developing research programs to test the theory."

Viktor Cerny of the Archaeogenetics Laboratory, the Institute of Archaeology, in Prague, called Rose's finding an "excellent theory," in an e-mail to LiveScience, though he also points out the need for more research to confirm it.

The findings have sparked discussion among researchers, including Carter and Cerny, who were allowed to provide comments within the research paper, about who exactly the humans were who occupied the Gulf basin.

"Given the presence of Neanderthal communities in the upper reaches of the Tigris and Euphrates River, as well as in the eastern Mediterranean region, this may very well have been the contact zone between moderns and Neanderthals," Rose told LiveScience. In fact, recent evidence from the sequencing of the Neanderthal genome suggests interbreeding, meaning we are part caveman.

Watery refuge

The Gulf Oasis would have been a shallow inland basin exposed from about 75,000 years ago until 8,000 years ago, forming the southern tip of the Fertile Crescent, according to historical sea-level records.

And it would have been an ideal refuge from the harsh deserts surrounding it, with fresh water supplied by the Tigris, Euphrates, Karun and Wadi Baton Rivers, as well as by upwelling springs, Rose said. And during the last ice age when conditions were at their driest, this basin would've been at its largest.

In fact, in recent years, archaeologists have turned up evidence of a wave of human settlements along the shores of the Gulf dating to about 7,500 years ago.

"Where before there had been but a handful of scattered hunting camps, suddenly, over 60 new archaeological sites appear virtually overnight," Rose said. "These settlements boast well-built, permanent stone houses, long-distance trade networks, elaborately decorated pottery, domesticated animals, and even evidence for one of the oldest boats in the world."

Rather than quickly evolving settlements, Rose thinks precursor populations did exist but have remained hidden beneath the Gulf. [History's Most Overlooked Mysteries]

"Perhaps it is no coincidence that the founding of such remarkably well developed communities along the shoreline corresponds with the flooding of the Persian Gulf basin around 8,000 years ago," Rose said. "These new colonists may have come from the heart of the Gulf, displaced by rising water levels that plunged the once fertile landscape beneath the waters of the Indian Ocean."

Ironclad case?

The most definitive evidence of these human camps in the Gulf comes from a new archaeological site called Jebel Faya 1 within the Gulf basin that was discovered four years ago. There, Hans-Peter Uerpmann of the University of Tubingen in Germany found three different Paleolithic settlements occurring from about 125,000 to 25,000 years ago. That and other archaeological sites, Rose said, indicate "that early human groups were living around the Gulf basin throughout the Late Pleistocene."

To make an ironclad case for such human occupation during the Paleolithic, or early Stone Age, of the now-submerged landmass, Rose said scientists would need to find any evidence of stone tools scattered under the Gulf. "As for the Neolithic, it would be wonderful to find some evidence for human-built structures," dated to that time period in the Gulf, Rose said.

Carter said in order to make for a solid case, "we would need to find a submerged site, and excavate it underwater. This would likely only happen as the culmination of years of survey in carefully selected areas."

Cerny said a sealed-tight case could be made with "some fossils of the anatomically modern humans some 100,000 years old found in South Arabia."

And there's a hint of mythology here, too, Rose pointed out. "Nearly every civilization living in southern Mesopotamia has told some form of the flood myth. While the names might change, the content and structure are consistent from 2,500 B.C. to the Genesis account to the Qur'anic version," Rose said.

Perhaps evidence beneath the Gulf? "If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands," said Rose, quoting Douglas Adams.


http://www.livescience.com/history/lost ... 01209.html

[/tab]

.
.


"Moon Landing Hoax", Big Foot & Neanderthal Jews, that the ticket to really waking up the masses !




And we are also graceful "forgetting"  the whole Sephardic Jews in this context from the perception of the goyim and putting them in a sephardic hebrew safe place !



Brilliant !




.
.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Wow /tab... that's almost "NEGENTROPIC" lord knows his ghost seems to haunt a few threads around here at TIU ... :lol: