jim condit covers circumcision

[Large Sarge]

Probably My Most Shocking Email Ever. You'll
> never guess the subject.
>
> The original title I was considering for this
> Network America ewire was: Male Mutilation -- the
> Crime against humanity known as modern
> Circumcision.
>
> I have just learned in recent months, to my
> abysmal shock, of the horrendous crime against
> humanity, especially in the USA, known as MODERN
> male circumcision.
>
> I am writing this now in the hopes that some baby
> boys about to be born will be rescued from the
> Jewish Rabbi, or the dumb-dumb-dumb Christian
> doctor or nurse, who is planning to mutilate your
> baby boy FOR LIFE a few hours after he is born -
> by ripping away the foreskin that God put there
> for several reasons, including to protect the
> male organ from unnecessary stimulation in the
> normal course of life, and - MOST IMPORTANTLY --
> to achieve the proper physical bond between
> husband and wife in the marriage act.
>
> Since about 1945, when organized world
> Rothschild/Jewry took over so much in the world,
> following their very successful and spectacular,
> murderous horror show known as World War II (see
> hitlerdvd.com) - organized Jewry was successful
> through their control of mass media in the USA in
> ushering in the circumcision of baby boys in
> almost all hospitals in the USA.
>
> In the late 40s, moral devils like Dr. Benjamin
> Spock (Jew) and Dr. Alan Guttmacher (murderous
> Jew behind Planned Parenthood) disseminated silly
> arguments such as that male mutilation via modern
> circumcision was necessary for "cleanliness".
> (Newsflash to the dumb-dumb-dumb Christian
> authorities who were cowed by this argument: any
> part of the body will get dirty and even
> sometimes infected if you don't wash it.)
>
> The devil Spock wrote in one of his book
> disseminated to millions of Christian mothers
> (who weren't warned that Spock was a Jew warring
> against Christian society) that they should let
> their baby boys be circumcised - so that their
> baby boy wouldn't look different from everyone
> else !!!!!!!!!!!!!! - In other words, -- let's
> mutilate everybody so we'll all look alike.
>
> One reason the top Jews wanted everyone
> circumcised was so that Jews would not stand out
> in this regard - as was the case before World War
> II. Hitler, even as documented by historian David
> Irving, would not allow anyone, even his doctors,
> to see him naked. The usual excuse given for this
> is that he had only one testicle. How about that
> he was the grandson of a Rothschild, as the
> Austrian government at the time insisted? - and
> that he (Hitler) himself was circumcised? How
> about that possibility? (Again, those incredulous
> to this line of investigation, see hitlerdvd.com
> )
>
> HAVE YOU WONDERED ABOUT THE RISE OF ALL THESE
> "SEX PILL" ADS
>
> On WLW radio in Cincinnati, and in many other
> places, and throughout every region of the
> nation, we the public have been inundated with
> ads for pills and potions that will allegedly
> make for "longer . . . lasting . . . thicker . .
> . wider" - I'm sure you've heard these crass ads.
>
> When they began a few years ago, I wondered,
> "What is this? You mean human beings need all
> these add-ons, -- unavailable in decades past and
> centuries past - to make relations between a man
> and woman work right? Preposterous!"
>
> And now I've found the answer: all these remedies
> are being provided because the man who had his
> foreskin violently and painfully ripped away when
> he was a few hours out of the womb - does not
> have the natural tool God gave him to properly
> interact with his wife.
>
> It's too long to go into here, but I've heard the
> case made persuasively that the industry for all
> the oils, gels, pills, potions, etc. etc. have
> been made possible because of the mutilation of
> the modern circumcision of American males. To put
> it bluntly, a non-circumcised man and his wife
> would look quizzically at such ads and say, "What
> would that be necessary for?" -- or - "Why would
> anybody need that stuff?"
>
> TALE OF TWO WOMEN - NOT TOLD HERE
>
> After long thought, I've decided I cannot go any
> further with descriptions of the contrast between
> the whole man (uncircumcised) and the mutilated
> man (victim of modern circumcision, i.e.,
> mutilation) from the women's point of view in
> this ewire.
>
> The fact is that the testimony of women who
> either directly, or by implication, contrast
> relations with a circumcised man vs.
> uncircumcised man - is shocking - and will make
> every red-blooded married or formerly married
> American man and woman furious.
>
> The lack of proper fulfillment as God intended in
> marriage has, I am persuaded by some who
> explained these things to me, contributed to the
> explosion in men falling for pornography in this
> generation, -- and to both men and women looking
> around themselves as they go through adult life,
> and thinking to themselves, perhaps almost
> involuntarily: "Would relations be better with
> that one? With that one? With that one?" - and so
> on.
>
> This is a subject with earth-shaking implications
> for society - and I am obviously only scratching
> the surface here, but hopefully giving a coherent
> and useful summary of the issue.
>
> Because the interested reader will need more
> evidence, I am forced to recommend the website
> that appears to be doing the ground-breaking
> research on this subject, even though I am not
> happy with the way that some of it is presented
> (however, I do think they are doing their best,
> as they see it, to be clinical and informative).
> This website is recommended by me for only
> married couples - in the hopes that they will get
> the evidence they need to convince them to NOT
> mutilate their baby boy via modern circumcision.
>
> The website is: www.sexasnatureintendedit.com
>
>
> The book by the same name will be covered briefly
> near the end of this Network America ewire. The
> book goes into the ten most prominent ways that
> the circumcising of men hurts women (and, of
> course, the men also).
>
> A CRIME AGAINST MARRIAGE
>
> I am convinced this modern circumcision of male
> babies since 1945 is the reason why so many women
> in this generation are not becoming properly
> bonded to their husband. Great marriages are not
> quite as good as they would have been; good
> marriages are mediocre, mediocre marriages easily
> go bad, and bad marriages are strained to the
> breaking point much more easily. This
> "marriage-divorce" issue is a big subject, but I
> must leave it here for this ewire.
>
> THE USUAL SUSPECTS
>
> Circumcision was heavily introduced here in the
> USA when the Rothschilds sent across the Atlantic
> one of their creeps, Abraham Flexner (Jew), to
> start the abominable, and always Jewish
> controlled, American Medical Association (AMA).
> This crowd has also been the great practitioners
> of the vaccine industry (Salk and Sabin - both
> Jews), which many experts claim is the reason why
> now 1 out of 94 American male babies have AUTISM
> (!!!!!!).
>
> If you want to see a man look as close as
> possible to a human demon - see the video of
> Jonas Salk as he took the stage to announce his
> new so-called polio vaccine in the 1950s. This
> video can be found in the DVD, "Vaccine Nation" -
> which is a must-see DVD, and can be found at
> www.911weknow.com - in the store section. (After
> seeing this video, you will never be sure again
> when you hear that a man has been jailed for
> "shaking baby" syndrome.)
>
> To be fair, as always, a number of the most
> courageous and prominent whistle-blowers of the
> mercury-in-vaccines-autism connection are Jewish
> doctors or investigators; I'm blasting in this
> e-wire, as always, the top elite wire-pullers of
> world Jewry who continue their war against
> mankind, and especially their war against the
> white race descended from Europe, -- and their
> war continues to this minute. By the way, for any
> Jewish individuals reading this, the Rabbis have
> mutilated Jewish male babies in this way for the
> last two millennia, with their insane attachment
> to the defunct Old Covenant.
>
> For more information on the destructive
> Rabbinical mind, see the much persecuted Michael
> A. Hoffman II's new book, "Judaism Discovered."
> --- As the Jewish controlled big media inundates
> us with real and alleged problematical passages
> in the Koran, -- surely it's not outside the
> bounds of free speech to inquire into what's in
> the Talmud and the Rabbinical mind.) Another
> excellent source is Carol Valentine's website,
> come-and-hear.com --
>
> TRAGEDY OVER THE LAST TWO GENERATIONS
>
> Circumcisions were up to 90% of baby boys in the
> USA by 1959. The fact is that almost every baby
> boy in the last two generations in the USA has
> been circumcised , while the overwhelming
> majority of the pre-1940s generation of
> non-Jewish men (and before) were not circumcised.
>
> As stated above, I'm not going to go into the
> clinical details, but a word to search for to
> bring up many sites and pages on the internet is:
> "intactivist". Which, if separated to make the
> meaning clearer would be: INTACT-ivist, meaning
> those who want to see baby boys kept "intact" and
> not mutilated by modern circumcision.
>
> Sex as nature intended it, and the pleasure both
> husband and wife  should derive therefrom, and
> the resultant bonding of the woman to the man --
> was built in by God to help couples over the
> rough seas of life. Male mutilation shortly after
> birth, or modern circumcision, is - to repeat --
> stressing great marriages to be not as great;
> very good marriages to only be good; good
> marriages to be mediocre; mediocre marriages to
> be poor, and poor marriages to often break up.
>
> There is a REASON (actually a number of reasons)
> that today's women do not "like marital
> relations" as much as the man, when their husband
> is circumcised.
>
> THE WISE CHRISTIAN RULERS OF OLD
>
> A few years ago when I saw one of the "Middle
> Ages" Rulings of the Catholic Church which I am
> about to mention -- I thought perhaps that the
> Popes making them were just ignorant and living
> in superstition. It appears the Christian rulers
> of those ages knew something that the USA has
> forgotten under the Rothchild /
> Rabbinical-influence that dared to rise and grab
> for all the levers of power, including hospitals,
> after 1945.
>
> Here are the type of rulings I ran into years
> ago, but dismissed:
>
> According to the General Council of Vienna:
> "Christians may not be enticed into Judaism;
> neither may they be circumcised for any reason."
>
> This was reinforced by the Council of Florence,
> in the document, "Cantate Domino" (1441) signed
> by Pope Eugene IV:
>
> "The Holy Roman Church firmly believes,
> professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining
> to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic
> law . . . although they were suited to the divine
> worship at that time, ceased, and the sacraments
> of the New Testament began; and whoever, even
> after the Passion, placed hope in these matters
> of the law and submitted himself to them as
> necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ
> could not save without them, sinned mortally . .
> . All, therefore, who after that time observe
> circumcision and the Sabbath and the other
> requirements of the [OLD] law, it declares alien
> to the Christian faith and not in the least fit
> to participate in eternal salvation, unless some
> day they recover from these errors."
>
> And then we find this same teaching reiterated in
> modern times. This was reinforced by Pope Pius
> XII in 1952:
>
> "From a moral point of view, circumcision is
> permissible if, in accordance with therapeutic
> principles, it prevents a disease that cannot be
> countered in any other way." Pius XII, Discorsi e
> messaggi radiodiffusi, t. XIV, Rome 1952,
> 328-329.
>
> OBVIOUSLY, circumcision, especially modern
> circumcison of baby boys as soon as they are
> born, is not necessary to counter any disease.
>
> HOW ABOUT CIRCUMCISION IN THE OLD TESTAMENT - AND
> WASN'T OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST CIRCUMCISED?
>
> The recently deceased Dr. Paul Reznowski, who
> gave me 90% of the "Nazi-Zionist Connection"
> information you will find at hitlerdvd.com -
> explained to me that circumcision in the Old
> Testament was a punishment for the transgressions
> of various generations of Jews early in the Old
> Testament.
>
> And, yes, Jesus Christ was circumcised, and the
> Catholic Church celebrates His circumcision on
> January 1st every year, which was the first
> shedding of his blood. However, Old Testament
> circumcision was just a snip of a small piece of
> foreskin - NOT the complete ripping away of this
> important part of the male body. While I haven't
> researched this myself, I've been told that this
> subject is covered at www.fisheaters.com -
> although I cannot endorse that website's myopic
> take on the current crisis in the structures of
> the Catholic Church from top to bottom (see
> October1958.com for what I believe is the correct
> reading of this unprecedented crisis).
>
> But then Christ replaced the Old Law with the New
> Covenant --- which explains why the Catholic
> Church has always condemned the act of male
> circumcision, unless to prevent an otherwise
> unavoidable disease, for the last 2000 years.
>
> And yet the stiff-necked Rabbis, mutilating both
> the Jewish male babies for millennia -- and now
> the rest of us in the last two generations in the
> USA, -- thus continue to resist the New Covenant
> and Christianity whenever they feel powerful
> enough to do so.
>
> SAVE THE NEXT GENERATION OF BABY BOYS FROM
> MUTILATION BY MODERN CIRCUMCISION
>
> Circumcision is an unmitigated disaster for the
> relations between men and women -- and deprives
> both of the pleasure God intended in marriage.
>
> In any case, spread the word to pregnant women
> and their husbands: "Do not mutilate your baby
> boy through circumcision!"
>
> The book, "Sex as Nature Intended it" by Kristen
> O'Hara, with Jeffrey O'Hara, and with a forward
> by Dr. George C. Denniston, M.D., goes into the
> ten ways that circumcision hurts women's
> experience, and obviously men's as well. (I have
> only read excerpts of this book on the internet,
> and cannot vouch for everything in the book, or
> the way it is presented, but this is the dilemma
> when there is a dearth of information on a
> critical subject. The same caution goes for many
> of the websites that deal with this subject,
> although I think all of them I saw were primarily
> trying to be clinical and informative to the best
> of their ability, as they saw it.)
>
> Needless to say, for someone like me, who has
> always been considered a "prud" by most people
> who have known me, this is a very delicate and
> awkward subject to deal with in public. How to
> present it is a no-win situation in many ways.
>
> I present it for one reason: to combat the war
> being waged against baby boys in the USA through
> the violent and painful mutilation known as
> modern circumcision.
>
> I hope that this Network America ewire will be
> circulated widely - and will play a part in
> preventing tens of thousands - and maybe
> eventually millions of baby boys from being
> mutilated by modern circumcision.
>
> For the sake of women, for the sake of men, for
> the sake of marriage, for the sake of society, --
> we must not allow to happen to the next
> generations of baby boys - what happened to the
> last two generations of baby boys in the USA.
>
> One more word from the recently deceased - the
> late, great Dr. Paul Reznowski. He told me when I
> discussed this with him in our last conversation
> a few months ago, that the foreskin hood was
> meant by God to be a sheath for the "sword" of
> the male organ - something which was not to be
> taken out of the sheath unless you intended to
> use it.
>
> He - himself an M.D. - told me that when his boys
> were born, the nurse or someone would come in to
> get the routine approval for the imminent
> circumcision. He said he would tell them in a
> firm and brusque tone, "No." And then they would
> start saying, "But don't you want . . . blah,
> blah, blah . . ." - and he would again firmly and
> brusquely say, "No. What about "no" do you not
> understand?"
>
> Thankfully, many more nurses now oppose modern
> male circumcision - and hopefully this ewire will
> play a part in causing that number to increase
> exponentially.
>
> Safeguard the future of the married men and women
> of the next generation! Do not mutilate your baby
> boy through modern circumcision!

[rmstock]

TRAGEDY OVER THE LAST TWO GENERATIONS

Circumcisions were up to 90% of baby boys in the
USA by 1959. The fact is that almost every baby
boy in the last two generations in the USA has
been circumcised , while the overwhelming
majority of the pre-1940s generation of
non-Jewish men (and before) were not circumcised.

Is this what we today call the baby boomer tragedy?
So if the article is right, every boy born today in the USA
gets circumsized, without questions asked? That can't be true.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Interesting links LargeSarge and rmstock.

I found this of interest recently.

Freud, race, and gender
 By Sander L. Gilman

Check out page 25:

http://books.google.com/books?id=1lnOVR ... 3#PPA25,M1

It talks about the Viennese B'nai Br'ith started by Freud.  

It makes the claim that  B'nai Br'ith actually refers to "Circumcision" and Feminization of the "Male" !! At least in the Jewish collective mind.  It is simply a Jewish Masonic mind game from the 1800s  

[Ognir]

Interesting article

[anarchore]

What does everyone think of my psycho-surgical theory and investigation  of this?  I found that the most violent countries correlate with circ - surely this connection should not be lost on psychologists and public health officials?  Does it merit more investigation, or am I going too far?  (Originally posted on censored blog zionofascism.wordpress.com in late 2008).


LEGIONS OF THE MUTILATED

Picture the infant mind. The nervous system and the brain are developing
at a rapid pace, as the newborn adapts according to the sensory
stimulation of the new world he finds himself in. He is soothed, kept
warm, fed and happy by those who have been his guardians to this point.
All is good, and normal development of the parts of the brain that
govern higher thought is proceeding. Suddenly something is very wrong, a
world of pain as a part of his body is amputated. The developing nervous
system shrinks at the violation. Parts of the brain that were developing
wither and die.

Circumcision as Psycho-Surgery

Most depatterning/fragmenting/penetrating mind control techniques,
as practiced by intelligence agencies and cults involve some form
 of trauma or torture. What better time than infancy to
implement a deep subconscious(is mutilation behind Freudianism?) fear
of castration by the state, something that can be invoked later. The effect
on society these damaged people have is tremendous.  While perhaps not
turning all into psychopaths, it may make them more succeptible.

Circumcision seems to be an effective technique of trauma-induced mind
control at a time when the brain is at it's most plastic and receptive-
the baby remembers and internalizes everything at the deepest level.

     Immerman & Mackey (199 set forth an informed hypothesis that
removal of the sensors in the prepuce cause brain
disorganization/atrophy. Thereafter they seek to justify circumcision by
arguing that brain disorganization/atrophy has desirable social effects.

     Anand & Scalzo (2000) hypothesize that early abnormal stimulation
of the nervous system (such as the pain of circumcision) affect the
development of the nervous system and influence behavior.

An unconscious life lesson is imprinted- one that is used later by their
controllers, no doubt the ones who mandated this control mechanism.

     "Enough evidence now exists to say with confidence that male
circumcision causes psychological changes. The trauma of the experience
is injurious. It can have long-term deleterious effects later in life."1

Violence

Isn't it interesting that the more sane, advanced(or rapidly advancing
and hopefully liberating itself like China), peaceful cultures are ones
that do not practice circumcision:

Among the non-circumcising nations are Holland, Belgium, France,
Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Scandinavia, the U.S.S.R., China, and Japan2.

The places that have the highest rates of circumcision 75-100% of the
population are North and West Africa plus much of East Africa3

And of course there is Israel, which has to be about 100%.

What of the most violent country in the world, that has been at war
since it's inception?

     In the US, it rose during the 2 - 5 years after each war the US has
been involved in. It peaked at 90% in 1964, according to the Laumann
study (based on self-reporting by adults).

Well, what do ya know, it seems that the circumcised world has a near
monopoly on violence and corruption!

     Domestic violence in Israel is on the rise. Approximately 200,000
Israeli women are battered each year, according to the Israel Women's
Network. Some 40,000 of them reach emergency wards. Last year, 15 of
these victims died... ..."I think it's a very aggressive society we live
in," said Rachel Bialer, director of the Jerusalem shelter. "Our history
has a lot to do with it."4

Coincidence? Hmm looks like there is a cause-and-effect scenario here,
which again explains the legions of retarded 'conservative' warmongers,
and herded gatekeepered, idiot 'liberal' twits in the USA. There is even
a feedback effect as the warlike ritual abusive society thinks of
circumcision as a Spartan-like ritual.

     The "war" connection ("It'll make a man of him"?) suggests it will
rise again, perhaps using the "desert sand" myth.5

Damaged Goods

It seems like the George Bush/ Bill O'Reilly/ Rush Limbaugh type of
neurologically damaged, genitally(and genetically?) mutilated freaks is
unique to the USA and increasingly, Canada. I wonder if there is a
neocon anywhere who is not circumcised.

With this in mind, it would be prudent not to have such 'damaged goods'
allowed in any position of authority. Does this explain why the
governments of northern Europe are sane(before being infiltrated by
circumcised Zionists, you get the pattern), but the
Jew/circumcised/Israeli/USA/Brit/Arab realm is like a bunch of regressed
two-year-olds? Should we allow these dangerous neurologically damaged
and mentally volatile toddlers near any political power?

No empathy, rage, a desire to see enemies even when they aren't
there(possibly still trying to find the cause of their psycho-castration
in the guise of Bin Laden- sorry guys, he wasn't the one that mutilated
you), a lack of respect for nature(lack of
feeling/amputation/calloused). You only see this type of person in
Canada or the US.
sixpack

Typical brain damaged/circumcised American/Canadian Bush/Israel
supporter, still trying to drown his buried pain and fears

The are the idiots ripping up the landscape on their ATVs, who see
nature as 'recreation', not as something that should be respected in
it's own right. Damaged Goods type of people have no appreciation for
the beauty of the world, because simmering inside their subconscious is
the knowledge that it could happed again, someone could be plotting to
castrate them(J-wish Dr Freud!):
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Conservatives.shtml
Covenant With G-d

The Jew is told that this mutilation was their covenant with God, and
they accept this. Built upon this is the persecution of Jews... so
whenever mention of Israel comes up, the Jew switches to his alter
persona, that of the 'chosen one', and is not above lying or any
dishonest tricks to advance the cause of the chosen, mutilated and mind
controlled. Latent circ/castration anxiety is conflated with the state
of Israel and Jews' chosen status- no wonder the Jews cannot discuss
things rationally, they have that subconscious fear.

For British/US/Canadian circumcised slaves of Zionism, they also bow to
Israel(when they aren't worshipping that other false idol, Churchill),
because they know that the world is a terrible place of treachery and
betrayal, they were taught it at a young age when the sexual part of
their body was destroyed, it is part of their being to be(or to cheer
on) bloodthirsty, credulous, killers, because of their ingrained insecurity.

How else to explain bloodthirsty Britain(high circ % in upper classes)
which spawns bloodthirsty USA(high circ %) and genocidal Canada(high
circ %) and finally their child Israhell is born, who shows the parents
how to perfect barbarity to a science?

The USA's terror campaigns in Asia, Africa, Central and South America
and the Arab world are an example of what happens when crazed and
heavily armed 'Muties' do their thing. Now the gentle people of Mexico
and Central America, the children of those killed or displaced by US
backed death squads are taking over the southern US. Poetic Justice.

Brain damaged, sexually mutilated, emotionally sterile, morally
deprived, spiritually depraved by-design monsters is what we see in the
circumcised Zionists, as they steadily increase their power and have
increasing influence on political parties, media, and finance, to be
consolidated in the current upheaval, no doubt.

The lunatics rule the asylum, practising their atavistic rites, that
perpetrate the violence and misery which they cannot help but sow,
damaged as they are...
Traumatic?

http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/goldman1/

     The severe pain of circumcision and the changes to infant-maternal
interaction observed after circumcision raise the question of the
effects on the mother. The typical hospital circumcision is performed
out of view of the parents, in a separate room. However, a few are
observed by parents, and many Jewish ritual circumcisions are carried
out in the homes of the parents. There are no studies of how these
parents respond to observing their son's circumcision. Personal accounts
vary and may include strong emotions. Some parents regret their son's
circumcision and report that they wish they had known more about
circumcision before they consented to it. Margaret Viola submitted the
following comments in her letter to a magazine:

         'My tiny son and I sobbed our hearts out. After everything I'd
worked for, carrying and nurturing Joseph in the womb, having him at
home against no small odds, keeping him by my side constantly since
birth, nursing him whenever he needed closeness and nourishment–the
circumcision was a horrible violation of all I felt we had shared. I
cried for days afterward' [20].

     Melissa Morrison was having a difficult time 7 months after she had
watched the circumcision of her son:

         'I'm finding myself obsessing more and more about it. It's
absolutely horrible. I didn't know how horrific it was going to be. It
was the most gruesome thing I have ever done in my life. I told the
doctor as soon as he was done, if I had a gun, I would have killed him.
I swear I would be in jail today if I did have a gun' [21]

     Other mothers have reported to the author's institution that
watching their son's circumcision was the 'the worst day of my life'.
Some mothers clearly remember their son's circumcision after many years;
Pollack reported 15 years after the event. 'The screams of my baby
remain embedded in my bones and haunt my mind.' She added, 'His cry
sounded like he was being butchered. I lost my milk' [22].

Conclusion

There is compelling evidence pointing to the fact that circumcision
causes many negative individual cognitive and psychological/emotional
impairments, with corresponding societal/governmental pathologies. While
all circumcised men may not be as psychotic as a Henry Kissinger, the
evidence points to a correlation between this bizarre act of bodily
vandalism, and corresponding mutilation of human rights, freedom, and
human dignity. Surely the Legions of the Mutilated have lost their
dignity and wish to lash out and do the same to others(fuck the world),
never knowing what is really motivating them. The Mutilated/cognitively
altered circumcision victims thus are a danger to us all.
Further reading

http://jewsribsinbearjaw.wordpress.com/ ... itual-ci...

Thanks also to fourthreichisrael for bringing this to my attention and
providing the inspiration for this essay.

A Bill to End Male Genital Mutilation in the USA - http://www.mgmbill.org/

NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource
Centers) - http://www.nocirc.org

Circumcision Information and Resource Pages - http://www.cirp.org

Doctors Opposing Circumcision - http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org

Attorneys for the Rights of the Child - http://www.arclaw.org

NOHARMM (National Organization to Halt the Abuse and Routine Mutilation
of Males) - http://www.noharmm.org

Stop Infant Circumcision Society - http://www.stopinfantcircumcision.org

NORM (National Organization of Restoring Men) - http://www.norm.org

NORM-UK - http://www.norm-uk.org

Male Circumcision and HIV - http://www.circumcisionandhiv.com/

Foreskin - http://www.foreskin.org

Ashley Montagu Resolution and Petition -
http://www.montagunocircpetition.org

Circumcision Resource Center - http://www.circumcision.org

Female Genital Cutting Education and Networking Project -
http://www.fgmnetwork.org

Forward (UK) - http://www.forwarduk.org.uk

Law Office of David J. Llewellyn (wrongful circumcision attorney) -
http://www.zbaer.com

Circumcision Quotes - http://www.circumcisionquotes.com

BoysToo - http://www.boystoo.com

Not Just Skin - http://www.notjustskin.org/en/index.html

Association for Genital Integrity (Canada) - http://www.courtchallenge.com

In Memory of the Sexually Mutilated Child -
http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org

Intactivism Pages - http://www.circumstitions.com

International Coalition for Genital Integrity - http://www.icgi.org

Mothers Against Circumcision - http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org

Jews Against Circumcision - http://www.jewsagainstcircumcision.org

Catholics Against Circumcision - http://www.catholicsagainstcircumcision.org

Acts 15 - http://www.acts15.org

Circumcised at 13 - http://www.jusay.com/circ13

History of Circumcision - http://www.historyofcircumcision.net

Circumcision Information Australia - http://www.circinfo.org

Intact (Canada) - http://www.intact.ca

Intersex Society of North America - http://www.isna.org

Intersex Initiative - http://www.intersexinitiative.org

Students for Genital Integrity - http://www.studentsforgenitalintegrity.org

Nurses for the Rights of the Child - http://www.nurses.cirp.org

Sex As Nature Intended It - http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com

StopCirc - http://www.stopcirc.com
References
1)

http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/
2)

http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wallerstein/
"The continuing practice of routine neonatal nonreligious circumcision
represents an enigma, particularly in the United States. About 80
percent of the world's population do not practice circumcision, nor have
they ever done so. Among the non-circumcising nations are Holland,
Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Scandinavia, the
U.S.S.R., China, and Japan. People employing circumcision do so either
for "health" reasons or as a religious ritual practiced by Muslims,
Jews, most black Africans, non-white Australians, and others."
3)

http://www.circlist.com/rites/rates.html
North and West Africa plus much of East Africa[@:
genocide-and-constant-strife-and-violence-land, basically], eg Algeria,
Cameroon, Chad, Dahomey, Egypt (Muslim and Christian), Ethiopia, Gabon,
Gambia, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya. Libya, Madagascar, Mali, Mauretania,
Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan,
Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Northern Uganda, Upper Volta, Zaire [NB, some
of these now have new names but it would be a real surprise if most of
the guys there had grown new foreskins as a result.). Plus the Islamic
areas of Asia - Afghanistan, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Indonesia (largest
Muslim nation), Iran, Iraq, Israel [OK not Muslim], Jordan, Kuwait,
Oman, Pakistan, (Hindu minority about 10%), Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria,
Turkey, UAE, Yemen (N+S). Plus Tonga and Samoa, with Canada and the US
at the bottom end of the range.
4)

http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/mo ... y_id/926...
5)

http://www.circumstitions.com/USA.html

"Contrary to most accounts, the ancient history of ritual circumcision
is almost completely irrelevant to the US. Secular circumcision began as
a "cure" for masturbation late in the 19th century in England. It
swiftly crossed the Atlantic - though it was only ever confined to the
upper classes in its homeland, where it has since withered and died.

In the US, it rose during the 2 - 5 years after each war the US has been
involved in. It peaked at 90% in 1964, according to the Laumann study
(based on self-reporting by adults). The "war" connection ("It'll make a
man of him"?) suggests it will rise again, perhaps using the "desert
sand" myth. "

[Papillon]

One of the pillars in Freud's theorie is the castrationcomplex in males and 'penis envy' in woman: evidently this links to circumsision and I noticed this long ago.

Papillon.

[anarchore]

Some hotshot young psycho/bio/anthropologist can make a name for himself and ruin his carreer by fleshing out this theory... I always thought Freuds' was wierd and perverted, but maybe his junk does apply... to the mutilated.

[Papillon]

But yet........... Freud's psychoanalysis hits many, many nails!!!! Much truth in it, actually the Talmud, the Protocols, the Caballah have a great deal of psychologic truth which inspired Freud, and obviously this is one of the reasons for the great succes the Jews have with their manipulation, blackmail and deception techniques.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

But yet........... Freud's psychoanalysis hits many, many nails!!!! Much truth in it, actually the Talmud, the Protocols, the Caballah have a great deal of psychologic truth which inspired Freud, and obviously this is one of the reasons for the great succes the Jews have with their manipulation, blackmail and deception techniques.

It's pretty amazing when you think about it. How the Caballah and Talmud tie in with modern Psychology-Psychiatric practices. Looks like the training to be a psychologist is pretty much the same as it was in the 1880-1890s Vienna  -- how to talk to overally paranoid and neurotic Jews (like Freud's daugther)!
It is all of a Caballah and Talmud principled mind-game at the end of the day.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers

Welcome to the website of the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, founded by healthcare professionals to provide information to expectant parents, healthcare professionals, educators, lawyers, ethicists, and concerned individuals about circumcision and genital cutting of male, female, and intersex infants and children, genital integrity, and human rights.

What you need to know...

# No national or international medical association recommends routine circumcision.
# Only the USA circumcises the majority of newborn boys without medical or religious reason.
# Medicalized circumcision began during the 1800s to prevent masturbation, which was believed to cause disease.
# Today's parents are learning that the foreskin is a normal, protective, functioning organ.
# Today's parents realize circumcision harms and has unnecessary risks.
# Circumcision denies a male's right to genital integrity and choice for his own body.


http://www.nocirc.org/

http://www.nocirc.org/publish/2pam.pdf

About NOCIRC

Dedicated to making a safer world, NOCIRC is a 501(c)(3) educational non-profit organization committed milos.jpg (10748 bytes) to securing the birthright of male, female, and intersex children and babies to keep their sex organs intact.

On March 15, 1986, a group of healthcare professionals in the San Francisco Bay Area, led by Marilyn Milos RN, announced the (1985) founding of the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers (NOCIRC); the first national clearinghouse in the United States for information about circumcision. In its first decade, NOCIRC grew into an international network and now has more than 110 centers worldwide.
NOCIRC provides educational material about the structures, functions, development, and care of normal penile anatomy and offers information about circumcision and the care of the circumcised as well as the intact penis. NOCIRC suggests that circumcision be performed only when it is absolutely medically necessary, after all non-invasive therapies have failed, or when an adult gives consent, after he has been fully informed about the risks and harm of the surgery. NOCIRC's position is based on the fact that not one national or international medical association in the world—including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association—recommends routine infant circumcision and now, recognizing the harm and life-long consequences, some are recommending against it.

NOCIRC:

    * Maintains offices open to the public and answers requests for information by phone and mail.
    * Offers a referral service that provides the names of doctors, lawyers and advocates who are educated about the functions of the foreskin and the medical, ethical and legal reasons that the sexual organs of children should be left intact.
    * Disseminates educational material , provides instruction, and shares research findings with parents, health-care professionals, lawyers, legislators and other concerned individuals.
    * Owns one of the largest collections of information about circumcision in the world.
    * Endorses and upholds the Declaration of the First International Symposium on Circumcision.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Condit doesn't explain how the circumcised male fails to fully bond with a woman. Would be interesting to know the details behind this assertion.

[Fester]

Dr. Rebecca Carley had at least one show on this which I thought was interesting:
http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/RBN-BACKUP/commercialFree.html

Not sure if it all holds up, but there's no fuckin' reason to do it and it's definitely Jew-based and pointless mutilation.

http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/RBN-BACKUP/August-2010/WAA_8-21-10_Pt-1_Mq_Ad-Free.mp3

http://thelightofdayradioshow.com/archives/RBN-BACKUP/August-2010/WAA_8-21-10_Pt-2_Mq_Ad-Free.mp3

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

It makes sense that Jews would push circumcision onto gentiles as a means to integrate themselves into Western society. With Jews and gentiles both being circumcised and Jews inter-marrying with white-anglos, they become -- in appearance -- more and more like us.

Secondly, circumcision affects male-female relations, thus providing yet another means of social engineering for the Jewish-Illuminati program.

[jai_mann]

Condit doesn't explain how the circumcised male fails to fully bond with a woman. Would be interesting to know the details behind this assertion.

Well right off the bat a circumcised penis is lacking skin receptors that would stimulate the male brain more. It's like chopping off the tip of one of your fingers. The receptors are gone, and hence the brain region that processed the stimuli associated with those receptors is not going to be stimulated.

I would venture so far as to say that men who are circumcised do not feel the same intensity of sexual intercourse as men who are uncircumcised. That alone could account for reduced bonding.

It's completely fucked up to maim children like this and it is a result of jews. Those pervert rabbi's suck on a child's penis after maiming them. No doubt they get high off of the baby's adrenaline, which must be pumping quite high after having a critical organ severely maimed.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Condit doesn't explain how the circumcised male fails to fully bond with a woman. Would be interesting to know the details behind this assertion.

Well right off the bat a circumcised penis is lacking skin receptors that would stimulate the male brain more. It's like chopping off the tip of one of your fingers. The receptors are gone, and hence the brain region that processed the stimuli associated with those receptors is not going to be stimulated.

I would venture so far as to say that men who are circumcised do not feel the same intensity of sexual intercourse as men who are uncircumcised. That alone could account for reduced bonding.

It's completely fucked up to maim children like this and it is a result of jews. Those pervert rabbi's suck on a child's penis after maiming them. No doubt they get high off of the baby's adrenaline, which must be pumping quite high after having a critical organ severely maimed.

Agreed. As for women, what psychological factors come into play? Scientists have already shown how the foreskin keeps a woman aroused more and provides for more lubrication, but what about psychologically? I mean, bonding isn't only physical.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

One of the pillars in Freud's theorie is the castrationcomplex in males and 'penis envy' in woman: evidently this links to circumsision and I noticed this long ago.

Papillon.

Papillon, can you please expand on this. I am not familiar with this.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Found this recently on this subject---of course Jews are behind it all:

Interest in circumcision as a treatment for masturbation began to emerge in the 1850s. As the medical discourse on sexual hygiene gathered momentum, attention was focused on uncleanliness as a cause of masturbatory activity. The English physician James Copland, one of the first to advocate circumcision in the Anglo-Saxon world, claimed that masturbation was essentially an attempt to relieve, by friction, the "local irritations" caused by smegmatic accumulations under the prepuce. He recommended circumcision as a means of maintaining genital cleanliness, adding that the great physical resilience of the Jewish people was due to the observance of this "salutary rite" (III, 442; 445). By the end of the nineteenth century, the medical pleas for circumcision had become more insistent. The American physician Remondino, author of the best selling History of Circumcision, pitied the "unlucky and unhappy wearer of a prepuce": this "tight-constricted, glans-deforming, onanism-producing, cancer-generating" appendage, he claimed was an "unknown, undiscovered, and therefore unexplored region for some thousands of years," until the medical profession, venturing at last into this "Darkest Africa," had revealed the malign influence it exercised on its unwary victims (255-56) Parents could not make a "better paying investment" for their sons than circumcision: it was like a "substantial and well secured life-annuity," making for greater capacity for labor, a longer life, less nervousness, and fewer doctors' bills (186).

Physicians such as Remondino had little difficulty in persuading their middle-class readers, who already appreciated the importance of hygiene and moral restraint: it was the observance of regular habits that ostensibly set the middle classes apart from the debauched aristocracy and the degenerate working classes, legitimating middle class claims to cultural hegemony. By the early twentieth century, circumcision had become common among the upper and professional classes in Britain and America. In the 1930s, the earliest period for which statistics are available, two-thirds of public-school boys were circumcised as compared to one-tenth of working class boys; the British royal family employed a Jewish mohel for the purpose as late as the end of 1948. By virtue of its association with filth and sexual excess, the prepuce had become a marker of inferior social status: already by the end of the 1890s an equation was being made in America between being "uncircumcised" and being "uncivilized."

As Ronald Hyam has noted, circumcision was central to the late-Victorian re-definition of manliness in terms of sexual restraint and "cleanness." As the purity campaign gathered momentum in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the meaning of manliness shifted from the ideals of moral strenuousness and integrity to a cult of athleticism and robust virility. The offensive on male lust and the double standard of sexual morality presented masculinity as a never-ending battle requiring watchfulness and supervision: muscular Christianity was the goal, attainable through strict mental and physical discipline. Widely believed to dampen sexual desire, circumcision was seen positively as a means of promoting both the chastity and the physical health of the custodians of the empire ("Hygienic value," 271).

The emphasis on sexual hygiene no doubt explains why a Jewish ritual like circumcision was adopted by the British ruling elite, notwithstanding the antisemitism of much Victorian culture: at a time of profound concern about the physical decline of British manhood, the resilience of the Jews in the face of adversity and persecution was held up as proof that sexual hygiene was the mainspring of a nations vigor. While George Eliot's Daniel Deronda (1876) opposed the sustaining values of Jewish culture to the shallow conventions of contemporary Victorian society, doctors and politicians noted with envy the longevity and sturdiness of the Jews, testifying to the rarity of venereal disease, tuberculosis, and cancer of the penis in Jewish communities, as well as to the low levels of infant mortality, illegitimacy, and criminality. Over and over again, commentators attributed the physical and moral superiority of the Jews to the religious rituals and prescriptions observed in their culture (Remondino 161-82). In an influential article published in the Contemporary Review for 1903, Major General Sir Frederick Maurice, one the chief contributors to the turn-of-the-century physical deterioration debate, singled out childrearing practices as a factor contributing to the health and longevity of the Jews; although he did not recommend "stereotyped copying" of the Jews, he conceded that the rest of the nation had much to learn from them (Davin 16). The fact that circumcision had biblical sanction probably facilitated the spread of the practice in Christian Britain and America. The language of purity mobilized religious discourse, emphasizing the intimate connection between physical and moral health: circumcision showed that the divine law had scientific validation (Mort 109-12).

WORKS CITED

Cantlie, James. "Spermatorrhaea" A Dictionary of Medicine: Including General Pathology, General Therapeutics, Hygiene, and the Diseases Peculiar to Women and Children. Ed. R. Quain. 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green, 1882, II:144-50.

Comfort, Alex. The Anxiety Makers: Some Curious Preoccupations of the Medical Profession. London: Nelson, 1967.

Copland, James, "Pollutions," A Dictionary of Practical Medicine. 3 vols. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, 1858. III: 441-48.

Davin, Anne. "Imperialism and motherhood." History Workshop 5 (1978):9-66.

Englehardt, Tristam. "The Disease of Masturbation: Values and the Concept of Disease." Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48 (1974):234-248.

Hall, Lesley A. "Forbidden by God, Despised by Men: Masturbation, Medical Warnings, Moral Panic and Manhood in Great Britain, 1850-1950." Forbidden History: The State, Society, and the Regulation of Sexuality in Modern Europe. Ed. J. C. Font. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992, 293-316.

Hare, E.H. "Masturbatory Insanity: The History of an Idea." The Journal of Mental Science 108 (1962).

Hyam, Ronald. Empire and Sexuality: The British Experience. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1992, 293-316.

Laqueur, Thomas. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.

"M.D." "The Spermatorrhoea Imposture." Lancet 1 (1867): 25.

Mort, Frank. Dangerous Sexualities: Medico-Moral Politics in England Since 1830. London and New York: Routledge, 1987.

"Quack advertisements." Lancet 2 (1870): 72; 89-90; 124-26; 159-60; 224-25.

Remondino, P.C. History of Circumcision from the Earliest Times to the Present. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1900.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ornella Moscucci took her first degree in sociology at Bristol University and received a Ph.D on the history of British gynecology from the University of Oxford. Between 1987 and 1989 she worked on the history of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and subsequently held a post as Research Fellow at the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine in London. Her research has focused on the history of gender, and on the development of obstetrics and gynecology since 1800. Dr. Moscucci is the author of The Science of Woman: Gynaecology and Gender in England, 1800-1929, and of "Hermaphroditism and Sex Difference: The Construction of Gender in Victorian England" in Benjamin, Science and Sensibility.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citation:
Moscucci O. Clitoridectomy, Circumcision, and the Politics of Sexual Pleasure. In: Eds: Andrew H. Miller and James Eli Adams. Sexualities in Victorian Britain. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis 1996: 63-65 (ISBN 0-253-33066-1).

http://sites.google.com/site/completebaby/repression

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

The English physician James Copland, one of the first to advocate circumcision in the Anglo-Saxon world, claimed that masturbation was essentially an attempt to relieve, by friction, the "local irritations" caused by smegmatic accumulations under the prepuce.

What a load of shit.