WHO ARE THE ELDERS

Started by ada, June 26, 2011, 10:25:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ada

WHO ARE THE ELDERS?

This is a secret which has not been revealed. They are the Hidden hand. They are not the "Board of Deputies" (the Jewish Parliament in England) or the "Universal Israelite Alliance" which sits in Paris. But the late Walter Rathenau of the Allgemeiner Electricitaets Gesellschaft has thrown a little light on the subject and doubtless he was in possession of their names, being, in all likelihood, one of the chief leaders himself. Writing in the WIENER FREIE PRESSE, December 24, 1912, he said:

No more, are they a secret...they are the Soviet Bolshevik Chabad Lubavitch Babylonian Talmudic Pharisees of Lucifer's False Zion

      "Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage."

In the year 1844, on the eve of the Jewish Revolution of 1848, Benjamin Disraeli, whose real name was Israel, and who was a "damped," or baptized Jew, published his novel, CONINGSBY, in which occurs this ominous passage:

    "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

And he went on to show that these personages were all Jews.

Liars who say they are Jew, but are not and they are of the synagogues of Satan. These are the "Self Chosen" who have rejected the Chooser and are not the seed of Abraham through faith in Christ Jesus, but just "SAYERS"

They are the Chabad Lubavitch of the Soviet Bolshevik controlling Pharisaic  Parasitic non-Israel of the Babylonian Talmud the sons of the synagogue of Satan their god, seeking to establish the vision in which their Illuminated Satan will sit upon the throne of King David, the falseChrist as god showing that he is god in the Temple of the Messiah the Prince. They are the Rulers of Apostate Solomons Freemasonry. They hate the saints of Jesus and they seek to destroy the whore Jerusalem and the remnant of true flesh Jews, the so-called "Lesser Jews"


Now that Providence has brought to the light of day these secret Protocols all men may clearly see the hidden personages specified by Disraeli at work "behind the scenes" of all the Governments. This revelation entails on all  peoples the grave responsibility of examining and revising AU FOND their attitude towards the Race and Nation which boasts of its survival over all Empires.

Notes I. - "Agentur" and "The Political."
There are two words in this translation which are unusual, the word "AGENTUR" and "political" used as a substantive, AGENTUR appears to be a word adopted from the original and it means the whole body of agents and agencies made use of by the Elders, whether members of the tribe or their Gentile tools.

By "the Political" Mr. Marsden means, not exactly the "body politic" but the entire machinery of politics.

Notes II - The Symbolic Snake of Judaism.
Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols, Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:
This symbol you will see frequently on Wall Street such as INTEL.

"According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men already, in 929 B.C., thought out a scheme in theory for a peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion.

The Apostate son of David, Solomon, who worshipped Moloch and his star, the six pointed star that they made with their hands to worship and who began Free Masonry of the Mystery Babylonian Nimrod High Priest Pontifex Maximas Papacy tradition.

 As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this question. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people - the administration was always kept secret, EVEN FROM THE
JEWISH NATION ITSELF.

Yes in a peaceful manner the Whore was responsible for all that has been slain upon the earth. In a peaceful manner the War of 1812, the civil War, WW1-WWII and soon WWIII, in a peaceful manner millions were slain in Russia and Millions more at their hired Lackey's hands, Hitler, all to create their false-Zion and One World Order, their Olam Ha Ba..Oh but temporary and unblessed it and their Moshiach ben Satan be......and damned to eternity in gnashing and Gnawing of teeth in outer darkness. Jesus Christ is the Only Alpha and the Only Omega the Word which hath created everthing which hath been created.


These were and are the Pharisaic Talmudic Rabbi's of the Sanhedrin. Today they are known as Chabad Lubavitch and they soon hope to revive their much sought after Sanhedrin, Moshiach and their One World Order, called Olam Ha Ba and to rule over all the earth by the Talmudic Noachide Laws which was passed into Public Law  HJR in 1991 by Congress and signed into Law by the President George H. W. Bush who was also a Free Mason of the apostate Moloch Order of Solomon.

As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it - and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an ECONOMICAL CONQUEST. The return of the head of the Snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereign of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc.. These are the surest spreaders of licentiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of nations.

Bill Clinton's impeachment was brought by the Talmudic Jewess Monica Lewinsky. Making Room for the son of the Solomonic Apostate of the 33rd Degree to become the President of the United States, George W. Bush, also of the Babylonian Talmudic Order of Madam Blavatsky's Theosophy which Hitler was too, a student.

A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: - Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C..

Do not be deceived, it was not Rome who ruled the Jews, it was the Jews who controlled Rome as they did control Napolean, as they ruled Hitler, as they ruled Moscow and now as they rule Amerika.

 The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1814 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881. [This "Snake" is now being drawn through the Americas and in the United States of America, it is been partially identified as the "Counsel on Foreign Relations" (C.F.R.) and the "Tri-Lateral Commission"]. All these States which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions, England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieft and Odessa.

Moscow was taken by the Jews Trotsky and Lenin and now left to writhe in agony in its death throws after being ravaged by the Robbers. Do not be deceived Gorby did not tear down the invisible wall of the Global conquest of the Talmudic Olam Ha Ba and the Final Despot, the temporary king of the Jews, Moshiach ben Dovid, the son of perdition.

It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centuries of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake's course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the "Young Turk" - i.e., Jewish - Revolution in Turkey). den.

Notes III. - The term "Goyim," meaning Gentile
or non-Jews, is used throughout the
Protocols and is retained by Mr. Marsden.
One entry found for goy.
Main Entry: goy
Pronunciation: 'goi
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural goy·im  /'goi-&m/; also goys
Etymology: Yiddish, from Hebrew gOy people, nation
Date: 1841
sometimes disparaging : GENTILE 1
- goy·ish  /'goi-ish/ adjective, sometimes disparaging


http://www.samliquidation.com/protocolstoday.htm

Michael K.

Dear ada,

Your post was thought provoking in me, and it is tied in by concept with things I was talking about separately with an elder at Church, synchronicity as it were.  What just leaped out at me from the pages was this quote:

QuoteA map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: - Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C..

Do not be deceived, it was not Rome who ruled the Jews, it was the Jews who controlled Rome as they did control Napolean, as they ruled Hitler, as they ruled Moscow and now as they rule Amerika.

I did some backtracking and read over "http://www.samliquidation.com/protocolstoday.htm," which seems like a pretty together volume of commentary on The Protocols, most of his Christian statements seemed orthodox and not zany.  I will have to put in some more time over there.

Regarding the "Jews controlling Rome,"  I had read Harold Rhome's essay found here:

http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/rome_gave_birth_to_judaism.htm

QuoteA ROMAN-SPONSORED SANHEDRIN QUICKLY COMES INTO PLAY.

Not all the Jews left Palestine.  Some very special ones remained by Imperial invitation and under Imperial protection.  With full permission and blessing of the Romans, the Sanhedrin moved over to the coastal city of Jamnia (Javne, Jabneel), actually a much nicer location.  Rabbi Johanan ben Zakkai promptly received permission to found a halakha seminary and Talmudic law school.  Not only that, the money needed must have been considerable, but with presumed Roman cooperation, the yeshiva complex was created without delay.  This new "Judaic Vatican", founded and blessed by Rome, became a major force in systematizing the still evolving Judaic religion, among other things, determining the canon of scriptures.  Hundreds of years later, Judaic scholars based in Palestine produced the Aleppo Codex, working with both the Hebrew and Aramaic texts.  The works of Rabbi Johanan had a tremendous cultural and theological impact on the evolving Judaic religion.  His writings plus those of his students and later devotees comprise a great deal of the Mishna, a significant component of the modern Talmud.

A quick word about Harold Rhome; I don't agree with his Gnostic viewpoint, I don't recommend him to anyone as a role model, except that he is interesting to read and he covers a whole host of interesting factual matters.  I just don't take his views too much to heart.  But anyway, what matters is this reference to the Sanhedrin getting some help from Rome in building and thence systematizing the new religion of Talmudic Judaism.  That assertion turns out to be more or less true.  Looking at some sources of record:



http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13444a.htm

Catholic Encyclopedia

QuoteAs under the Greek rulers the Jews were allowed a large measure of self-government, many points of civil and religious administration fell to the lot of the high priests and the gerousía to settle. But when, after the Machabean wars, both the royal and priestly powers were invested in the person of the Hasmonean kings, the authority of the Sanhedrin was naturally thrown in the background by that of the autocratic rulers. Still the Sanhedrin, where a majority of Pharisees held sway, continued to be "the house of justice of the Hasmoneans" ("Talm.", Aboda zara, 36b; Sanh., 82a). A coup d'état of John Hyrcanus towards the end of his reign brought about a "Sadducean Sanhedrin" ("Antiq.", XVI, xi, 1; Sanh., 52b; Megillat Taanith, 10), which lasted until Jannæus; but owing to the conflicts between the new assembly and Alexander, it was soon restored, to be again overthrown by the Pharisaic reaction, under Alexandra. The intervention of Rome, occasioned by the strife between the sons of Alexandra, was momentarily fatal to the Sanhedrin in so far as the Roman proconsul Gabinius, by instituting similar assemblies at Gadara, Jericho, Amathonte, and Sapphora, limited the jurisdiction of the gerousía of Jerusalem to the city and the neighbouring district (57 B.C.). In 47, however, the appointment of Hyrcanus II as Ethnarch of the Jews resulted in the restoring of the Sanhedrin's authority all over the land. One of the first acts of the now all-powerful assembly was to pass judgment upon Herod, the son of Antipater, accused of cruelty in his government ("Antiq.", XI, ix, 4). The revengeful prince was not likely to forget this insult. No sooner, indeed, had he established his power at Jerusalem (37 B.C.), than forty-five of his former judges, more or less connected with the party of Antigonus, were put to death ("Antiq.", XV, i, 2). The Sanhedrin itself, however, Herod allowed to continue; but this new Sanhedrin, filled with his creatures, was henceforth utilized as a mere tool at his beck (as for instance in the case of the aged Hyrcanus). After the death of Herod, the territorial jurisdiction of the assembly was curtailed again and reduced to Judea, Samaria, and Idumea, the "ethnarchy" allotted to Archelaus. But this condition of affairs was not to last; for after the deposition of the Ethnarch and the annexation of Judea to the Roman province of Syria (A.D. 6), the Sanhedrin, under the control of the procurators, became the supreme authority of the Jewish people; only capital sentences pronounced by the assembly perhaps needed confirmation from the Roman officer before they could be carried into execution. Such was the state of things during the public life of the Saviour and the following thirty years (Matthew 26:57; Mark 14:55; 15:1; Luke 22:66; John 11:47; Acts 4:15; 5:21; 6:12; 22:30; 23:1 sq.; 24:20; "Antiq.", XX, 9:1; x; "Bell. Jud.", II, 15:6; "Vita", 12, 13, 38, 49, 70). Finally when the misgovernment of Albinus and Gessius Florus goaded the nation into rebellion, it was the Sanhedrin that first organized the struggle against Rome; but soon the Zealots, seizing the power in Jerusalem, put the famous assembly out of the way. Despite a nominal resurrection first at Jamnia, immediately after the destruction of the Holy City, and later on at Tiberias, the great Beth-Din of Jerusalem did not really survive the ruin of the nation, and later Jewish authors are right when, speaking of the sad events connected with the fall of Jerusalem, they deplore the cessation of the Sanhedrin (Sota, ix, end; Echa Rabbathi on Lam., v, 15).

There is quite a bit in the above paragraph, but breaking it down it generally supports the meme that Rabbinical Talmudic Judaism as it is today known was more or less established roughly contemporaneously with the Church's emergence in Jerusalem and the East.  The Jews of the Old Testament ceased to exist, but almost like in the movie "The Dark Crystal," they split into two polar opposite brothers.  One, following Christ and walking in the Holy Spirit, became a universal brother to all those who seek God.  The other, following his own ego, and goaded on by the devil himself, became a universal enemy to all not of his own blood brotherhood and an implacable enemy of the first brother as well.

This is where it takes on another interesting dimension, the question of how much into Rome's affairs did the Jews get, as supported by competent history?  Interestingly, if you look for Rome at its worst and most shameful, well, there's a Jew right in the middle of the picture.  Coincidence?

http://www.livius.org/he-hg/herodians/herod_agrippa_i.html

QuoteThe House of Herod: Herod Agrippa

Herod Agrippa: Jewish king, ruled 37-44. Because of his good connections in Rome, he was the last to unite the Jewish territories.

The Jewish king Herod the Great had many sons and one of them was Aristobulus. However, the prince and the king were not on speaking terms; after two trials before the Roman emperor Augustus, Herod had his son executed in 7 BCE. Aristobulus' son Agrippa, named after Augustus' friend Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, was spared.

The boy was only three years old -he was born in 11- and was sent to Rome, where he received a Roman education with the princes of the ruling dynasty, the Julio-Claudians. Among his companions were the later emperors Caligula and Claudius.

King Herod died in 4 BCE and was succeeded by three other sons: Herod Antipas was to rule Galilee and the east bank of the Jordan as a tetrarch; Philip was to be tetrarch of the Golan heights in the north-east; and Archelaus became the ethnarch ('national leader') of Samaria and Judaea.

For the greater part of his live, Agrippa lived in Rome. Here he met his wife Cyprus, a distant relative, and here his five children were born: Drusus (who died young), Agrippa, Berenice, Mariamme and Drusilla. He spent all his money, went bankrupt and had to flee from his creditors at the beginning of the thirties.
   
In 33, we find Agrippa in Idumea, the southern part of Judaea. Later, he was official in Tiberias, the capital of Galilee founded by his uncle Herod Antipas. However, Agrippa fell out of favor, went to Antioch, where he quarreled with the Roman governor, spent some time in Alexandria, where he encountered troubles too. However, a rich man named Tiberius Julius Alexander (the brother of the philosopher Philo) gave money to his wife. In his despair, he decided to return to Rome, where his friend Caligula was probably able to solve his financial problems. He had to borrow money and was unable to pay for the passage of his family.

In Rome, he discovered that Caligula could only help him when he was emperor. Agrippa encouraged him to seize power, but the emperor Tiberius knew what was happening and had the Jewish prince imprisoned in the autumn of 36.

He left the house of detention as a king. In 34, Agrippa's uncle Philip had died without sons. The emperor Tiberius had ordered his realms to be added to the province of Syria, but on March 16, 37, he died. Caligula became emperor and almost immediately restored the principality; as its king, he appointed his loyal supporter Herod Agrippa. He was the first to be called 'king' since his grandfather, Herod the Great, who had died almost forty years earlier.


   
Coin of Herod Agrippa
   
Agrippa stayed in Rome. The relation between the Jewish king and the Roman emperor was excellent, which is remarkable, because many considered Caligula a madman, and he could be very cruel indeed. In the early summer of 38, Caligula sent Herod Agrippa on a diplomatic mission to Alexandria. He discovered that governor Flaccus was incompetent and unable to stop the anti-Semitic agitation in the city (more). It is probable that this was also the moment on which he married his daughter Berenice to Marcus, the son of the Tiberius Julius Alexander who had given him financial help.

In July or August 38, Agrippa arrived in his kingdom. One of his first acts was directed against bandits who had taken over a part of the realm. Not much is known about this period of Agrippa's reign.

In 39, Agrippa's uncle Herod Antipas tried to 'steal' Agrippa's royal title. Caligula intervened: Agrippa's uncle was exiled to Gaul and his realm, Galilee and Peraea, was given to Agrippa.

At that moment, Agrippa was staying with Caligula, who was campaigning against the Germanic tribes along the Rhine. The ancient sources describe this war as a silly exercise of a mad emperor, but there is sufficient archaeological evidence of fighting in the neighborhood of Wiesbaden. There is also proof that in the winter of 39/40, the emperor and his entourage were present at a large military exercise near the mouth of the Rhine. A new campaign was launched against the Chauci on the shores of the North Sea. Agrippa must have been present, even though the details are unclear. The Jewish prince must have felt uncomfortable under the low skies of the Netherlands.

In January 41, Caligula -who was by now showing signs of complete insanity- and Herod Agrippa were in Rome. On the twenty-fourth, the emperor was murdered, and the Jewish king played a very important role during the accession of Claudius. The latter was grateful to Agrippa; Judaea and Samaria were added to Herod Agrippa's realm. He was now king of all the territories that had once been ruled by Herod the Great. Jerusalem was again the capital of Palestine as a whole and received new city walls. Agrippa's entry in the city of David and Herod was a triumph.

Like his uncles and grandfather, Agrippa was both a hellenistic and a Jewish ruler. His building program was essentially Greek; for example, he constructed a theater, an amphitheater, baths and porticoes in Beyrouth, a 'pagan' city. On the other hand, he did a lot for the temple in Jerusalem, repaired several buildings, and finished an aqueduct that had been ordered by Herod the Great and continued by Pontius Pilate. And many pious Jews will have appreciated how he took measures against a sect from Galilee, the Christians.

Something to think about, that's for sure.