Have we entered "Peak Jew" Scams?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Just reading the headlines today on several topics covering Sovereign debt, the Euro, the PIIGS, J'Bama's Debt ceiling, Irish-Italian-Spanish Bonds, Chinese real-estate, US bankruptcies, "Trillions Lost", Geithner's Hebraic wailing about "Pain"...etc.

It seems, it is time to ask the question:  "Have we entered 'Peak Jew' Scams?" on a Globalized Playing field?  :think:

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Moody's Places U.S. on Review for Downgrade As Debt Talks Stall
By John Detrixhe -
National Debt Clock

The National Debt Clock is shown in New York, on April 19, 2011. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
Moddy's Places U.S. on Review

Young Americans for Liberty club member Tony Burke, center, asks UC Irvine students to sign a petition to congress protesting the national debt on April 5, 2011 in Irvine, Calif. Photographer: Jebb Harris/Orange County Register/AP

Moody's Investors Service put the U.S. under review for a credit rating downgrade as talks to raise the government's $14.3 trillion debt limit stall, adding to concern that political gridlock will lead to a default.

The Aaa ratings of financial institutions directly linked to the U.S. government, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Home Loan Banks, and the Federal Farm Credit Banks, were also put on review for cuts, Moody's said in a statement today.

The U.S., rated Aaa since 1917, was put on review for the first time since 1995 on concern the debt limit will not be raised in time to prevent a missed payment of interest or principal on outstanding bonds and notes even though the risk remains low, Moody's said. The rating would likely be reduced to the Aa range and there is no assurance that Moody's would return its top rating even if a default is quickly cured.

"It certainly underscores the importance of passing the debt ceiling and not putting us in default status, and making sure there's a longer term fiscal plan to contain spending and the deficit we've been running up over the last few years," said Anthony Cronin, a Treasury bond trader at Societe General SA in New York, one of the 20 primary dealers that trade with the Federal Reserve. "Maybe it's the impetus to say we'll need more of a concession."
Dollar, Bonds

The dollar weakened and Treasuries were little changed after the Moody's statement. IntercontinentalExchange Inc.'s Dollar Index, which tracks the greenback against the currencies of six U.S. trading partners, including the euro, yen and pound, slid for a second day, shedding 1.1 percent.

The 10-year note yield was little changed at 2.88 percent at 5:31 p.m. in New York, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader prices, after increasing earlier as much as eight basis points to 2.96 percent. The yield dropped to 2.81 percent yesterday, the lowest since Dec. 1. The price of the 3.125 percent security due in May 2021 declined 1/32, or 31 cents per $1,000 face amount, to 102 2/32.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said he has taken steps to prevent a federal default until Aug. 2, using accounting measures that involve two retirement funds. The U.S. reached its borrowing limit on May 16.

The Moody's announcement is a "timely reminder" and that Congress must "move quickly" to avoid default, the Treasury said in a statement today.
Debt Talks

"What we're looking for is a raising of the limit. It doesn't matter the process that they get there," Steven Hess, the senior credit officer at Moody's in New York, said in a telephone interview. "The rating outlook will be determined by the longer-term debt trajectory."

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell proposed a "last choice option" yesterday that effectively would grant President Barack Obama power to raise the debt limit in installments. McConnell's plan would let the president raise the limit in three stages unless Congress disapproves by a two-thirds majority, while Obama would also be required to propose offsetting spending cuts. The spending reductions would be advisory, and the debt-ceiling increase would occur regardless of whether lawmakers enact the cuts.

"I think it reflects what we all know -- that this is a serious time and serious discussions and we can't continue to have people not contribute to solving this problem," said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the No. 4 Democratic leader in the chamber.
Boehner Reaction

"As Speaker Boehner has warned for months, if the White House does not take action soon to address our nation's debt crisis by reining in spending, the markets may do it for us," said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio. "This action by Moody's today reinforces the Speaker's warning."

Standard & Poor's put the U.S. government on notice on April 18 that it risks losing its AAA credit rating unless policy makers agree on a plan by 2013 to reduce budget deficits and the national debt. The firm said at the time that there's a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its "baseline assumption" is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits.

S&P would lower its sovereign top-level AAA ranking to D, the last rung on its scale if the U.S. can't pay its payments because of a failure to raise the debt ceiling, John Chambers, chairman of the company's sovereign rating committee, said June 30. Moody's said it would probably assign a position in the Aa range, or within three steps of its highest level.

The U.S. is among 17 countries, from Australia to Canada to Switzerland, rated Aaa by Moody's. S&P gives 18 countries its top ranking.

To contact the reporter on this story: John Detrixhe in New York at dliedtka@bloomberg.net

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-1 ... stall.html

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Fed Ready With Stimulus If Needed: Bernanke
By Jeannine Aversa and Joshua Zumbrun -


Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke told Congress the central bank is prepared to take additional action, including buying more government bonds, if the economy appears to be in danger of stalling.

"The possibility remains that the recent economic weakness may prove more persistent than expected and that deflationary risks might reemerge, implying a need for additional policy support," Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee in Washington today. The Fed "remains prepared to respond should economic developments indicate that an adjustment of monetary policy would be appropriate."

The comments are Bernanke's first since a government report on July 8 showed employers added 18,000 jobs in June, less than the most pessimistic forecast in a Bloomberg News survey of economists. Bernanke said "disappointing" job growth in May and June was partly a result of temporary effects, such as high energy prices, and he predicted in response to a question that the pace of economic expansion would accelerate above 3 percent in the second half of 2011.

"Once the temporary shocks that have been holding down economic activity pass, we expect to again see the effects of policy accommodation reflected in stronger economic activity and job creation," Bernanke said in his prepared remarks. He also said that "the economy could evolve in a way that would warrant a move toward less-accommodative policy."
Stocks Climb

Stocks extended gains after the comments. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index rose 1 percent to 1,327.12 at 1:31 p.m. in New York. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note was 2.9 percent, compared with 2.88 percent late yesterday.

Bernanke said the central bank still has ammunition to aid the recovery if the recent economic weakness proves more persistent than policy makers currently expect.

Responding to a question, he said the central bank must "keep all options on the table."

Bernanke re-affirmed plans by the Fed to sustain record stimulus and to hold its benchmark interest rate near zero for an "extended period." With unemployment at 9.2 percent, Bernanke told lawmakers that the "economy still needs a good deal of support."

The committee's chairman, Representative Spencer Bachus, a Republican from Alabama, told Bernanke he was glad that the Fed was keeping its options open. "You don't want to get straight jacketed," Bachus said. "Because we don't know what tomorrow may bring."
Inflation Prospects

Bernanke acknowledged there are "uncertainties" in both directions -- about the strength of the economic recovery and the prospects for inflation -- over the medium term.

The Fed chief repeated his belief that inflation won't be a problem for the economy because gasoline and food prices, which had surged earlier this year, are now moderating.

At the same time, he also reiterated that sagging home prices, high unemployment and hard-to-get loans pose long-term obstacles to growth.

One option for additional stimulus, Bernanke said, would be to pledge to hold interest rates at record lows and the Fed's balance sheet at a record high close to $3 trillion for a longer period of time. Another option is to embark on a third round of government bond purchases or to increase the average maturity of the Fed's current securities holdings. The Fed also could reduce the interest rate it pays banks on excess reserves parked at the central bank.

Bernanke said there is also the possibility that inflation could pick up in a way that would require the Fed to begin tightening credit and exit its record monetary stimulus.
Purchases Completed

The Fed last month completed a program to buy $600 billion worth of Treasury bonds aimed to stimulate the economy by reducing borrowing costs, boosting stock prices and spurring consumer spending.

Bernanke said a failure by Congress to raise the nation's $14.3 trillion debt limit would lead to a "major crisis" and throw "shock waves" through the financial system. He avoided endorsing specific tax and spending proposals in response to questions from House members.

The debt ceiling should be raised "to prevent us from defaulting on obligations which we have already incurred," Bernanke said. "We also need, of course, to take a serious attack on the unsustainability of our fiscal position."

President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress are scrambling to work out a deal to boost the legal debt limit in return for cutting federal deficits over the next decade. The Treasury Department has said the U.S. will reach the limit of its borrowing authority on Aug. 2.
Bond Yields

For all the concern in Washington about the deficit, bond yields in the U.S. are lower now than when the government was running a budget surplus a decade ago. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note is below the average of 7 percent since 1980 and the average of 5.48 percent in the 1998 through 2001 period, according to Bloomberg Bond Trader.

Bernanke said the Fed's bond purchases helped the economy. Stock prices are higher and bond yields have fallen. He estimated that effect of the program was roughly equivalent to a 40 to 120 basis-point reduction in the federal funds rate. And, the second round of bond buying lowered long-term interest rates by roughly 10 to 30 basis points.

Bernanke cited estimates made in the fall that the bond- buying could boost employment by about 700,000 over two years, or by about 30,000 extra jobs a month.
Benchmark Rate

At a June 22 news conference, Bernanke didn't rule out additional purchases if the economy were to weaken further. He and his colleagues pledged at a meeting the same day to hold the Fed's benchmark interest rate in a range of zero to 0.25 percent, where it's been since December 2008.

Minutes of the Fed's meeting released yesterday showed that policy makers were divided on whether additional monetary stimulus will be needed if the outlook for economic growth remains weak.

A few Fed members thought the committee "might have to consider providing additional monetary stimulus, especially if economic growth remained too slow to meaningfully reduce the unemployment rate in the medium run," the minutes said. A few voiced concern inflation may accelerate and warrant the FOMC "taking steps to begin removing policy accommodation sooner than currently anticipated."

Economic growth slowed to a 1.9 percent annual pace in the first three months of this year from a 3.1 percent rate in the final quarter of 2010. Fed policy makers blamed bad weather and energy prices for sapping consumer spending.
Growth Forecasts

The economy's growth probably accelerated to a 2 percent pace in the second quarter, according to the median forecast of 62 economists surveyed by Bloomberg from June 28 to July 7. Shortages of parts for manufacturers caused by the earthquakes and tsunami in Japan forced factories to slow production.

Parts supplies are now rising, along with measures of production. The Institute for Supply Management reported on July 1 that manufacturing expanded at a faster pace in June than the prior month. Orders to U.S. factories also have picked up.

Economic growth will accelerate to a 3.2 percent pace during the second half of this year, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

The slowdown in the first six months of 2011 prompted Fed officials to mark down their growth projections for the entire year. They forecast that the rate of expansion won't exceed 2.9 percent this year, down from April's top-end forecast of 3.3 percent.
Outlook for Unemployment

Unemployment by the end of the year will decline to between 8.6 percent and 8.9 percent. That's higher than the range of 8.4 percent to 8.7 percent under the previous forecast.

Lockheed Martin Corp., the world's largest defense contractor, and Cisco Systems Inc., the largest networking equipment company, are among firms reducing employment.

Cisco, based in San Jose, California, may cut as many as 10,000 jobs, including 7,000 by the end of August in a bid to revive profit growth. Lockheed Martin, based in Bethesda, Maryland, said late last month that it plans to eliminate about 1,500 employees from its Aeronautics business unit that makes F- 35 jet fighters.

Inflation, excluding food and energy, also will be slightly higher this year, between 1.5 percent and 1.8 percent, Fed officials predict. That's up from a range of 1.3 percent to 1.6 percent under the old forecast.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jeannine Aversa in Washington at jzumbrun@bloomberg.net

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-1 ... nanke.html

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Some missing parts found here as well:

http://mk.christogenea.org/pages/menace ... power.html

---------
The Menace of Money Power
1946
by A.K. Chesterton

Money can only be understood in terms of power. In the hands of the consumer it is power over goods. In the hands of the creative capitalist it is power over the means to produce goods. In the hands of the finance-capitalist, or money-lender, it is not only power over producers and consumers, but power as well over nations and their governments. The technique of money-lending on its simplest level is to make an advance against security, draw interest, and at an agreed date receive back the capital sum-other things being equal, a perfectly honest transaction. If the more ambitious money-lenders kept to this even routine, however, they would be a very long time attaining power. What they desire, therefore, is that the money they lend shall either be repaid to them when its buying power has been greatly enhanced, or that it shall not be repaid at all, thus enabling them to foreclose on their mortgage and become possessed of their victim's capital assets. These two motifs have long determined the course of economic history, explaining slump and boom, and enabling a small band of international lenders and manipulators to become the virtual masters of the world. The method was explained, with almost incredible candour, in an article which appeared in The U.S.A. Bankers' Magazine on August 26th, 1934:-

"Bonds and mortgages must be foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When through a process of the law the common people lose their homes they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under the control of leading financiers. This truth is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capital to govern the world. By dividing voters by the political party system we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance. Thus, by discreet action, we can secure for ourselves what has been so well planned."

Before investigating how this amiable programme has been, and is being, fulfilled, one popular fallacy should at once be exploded-the fallacy that this 'imperialism of capital' has been set up in the teeth of Left-Wing opposition. The contrary is true. Revolution throughout has been the friend and ally of finance-capitalism.

Whether or not the French Revolution increased the sum of human liberty, equality and fraternity, offers a subject for debate, but there can scarcely be any debate about its one concrete fact, which was the sweeping away of the Monarchical State and the founding in place thereof of the Bankers' State. The Revolution of 1848 brought precious little happiness to ordinary human beings, but out of it arose the central banking system of Germany, which reached its apotheosis under the Weimar Republic, when financiers achieved more absolute power than they had ever before enjoyed. The Russian Revolution, which furnishes a complete picture of the interrelation between international capitalism and socialism, will be considered later. Some account must first be given of the way finance works.

If a group of men in any country wishes to secure financial control over the country's destiny, the most obvious initial step is to gain control of the issue of currency. This involves two cardinal principles: a single, controllable currency basis, such as 'gold, and a monopoly of the sight to circulate notes and otherwise issue credit on that foundation. The banking history of the United States shows how the manipulators went to work to attain these objectives. Their weapon in every case was a deliberately engineered Stock Exchange panic, bringing ruin upon thousands of honest producers. In 1890 there was in America a monetary stringency, to counteract which the Government three years later introduced the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, providing the means by Government purchases of silver, of preventing currency contraction. The financiers moved swiftly into battle. This threat to gold, their chosen medium, could not be tolerated. The American Banking Association circulated to members instructions to sabotage the Government's plan:-

"Silver, silver certificates and treasury notes must be retired,' ran its fiat, 'and national bank notes upon a gold basis made the only money. This will require the authorisation of five hundred millions to one thousand millions of new bonds as the basis of circulation. You will at once retire one-third of your circulation and call in one half of your loans. Be careful to make a monetary stringency among your patrons, especially among influential business men. Advocate an extra session of Congress to repeal the purchasing clause of the Sherman Law."

Even at that time finance enjoyed a measure of international power, for India was brought in to help the campaign, which she did by stopping the minting of silver. This, in conjunction with the panic deliberately induced by the New York bankers, caused the closing-down of silver mines, the shutting of factories, the crashing of banks, widespread ruin-and, of course, the repeal of the offending Act. Gold henceforward was to be the sole basis of currency, as the bankers had planned.

While crashes of this diabolical kind had often, as here, a political motive, it is to be noted that those at the heart of the conspiracy invariably managed to turn the chaos to their own immense financial advantage. One direct result of the 1892 panic was the transference of the Union Pacific Railroad into the hands of Jacob Schiff, Head of the banking firm of Ruhn, Loeb & Company-today the monarchs of international finance. A few years later, moreover, Schiff managed to bring the mighty Great Northern Pacific Railway crashing to the ground, and from the ensuing panic his firm emerged as the complete masters of American railway finance: through Northern Securities Company it controlled £264,200,000 worth of stock and became an acknowledged member of the Money Trust which dominated the entire field of American Capitalism.

Jacob Schiff was now to be joined in Kuhn, Loeb & Company by Paul Warburg, scion of one of the great German banking families, and together they moved forward to the attainment of the second objective-a control of all currency through a central banking system. In 1907 there was another great crisis when the Knickerbocker Trust failed, not because of any general panic action by the ordinary investor, but because manipulators of the millionaire class wilfully created a run on the banks. From this debacle they emerged incomparably more powerful, having bought up the stock of the ruined victims, which they held to re-sell at par. At the same time the Steel Trust was able to complete its absolute monopoly. It may or may not have been a coincidence that Solomon Loeb, of Kuhn, Loeb & Company was a member of Knickerbocker Trust. At any rate the attainment of a central banking system was brought very much nearer to fulfilment-that consummation so devoutly wished by Kuhn, Loeb & Company. Appalled at the ducks and drakes which were being played with the money-system, many genuine idealists in the United States-chief among them Woodrow Wilson and William Jennings Bryan, the doughty foe of the Money-Power determined upon large-scale reforms to create order in place of the prevailing brigandage. And it so happened that there was a gentleman at hand only too happy to help them. His name was Mr. Paul Warburg! What did they want? To secure stability in the price level? Why, Mr. Wasburg had the precise specific up his sleeve-a Federal Reserve System which would hold reserves centrally and dispatch supplies of credit at once to any necessitous bank in the system that might call for them. His plan, in most essentials, was the one adopted, and on December 20th, 1913, Mr. Carter Glass, sincerely denouncing the old laissez-faire order, secured the passage through the House of Representatives of the Federal Reserve Act, the vital clause of which, when the Bill was introduced, was a provision for the fixing of the discount rate to promote stability in the price level: how ironical was it, therefore, that when the Bill emerged these words 'to promote stability in the price level' were surreptitiously dropped! At subsequent investigations officials of the Federal Reserve Board even denied that such had ever been its function. Two years later, Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, our Ambassador to the United States, placed on record the fact that the group of financiers associated with Kuhn, Loeb & Company had become supreme in America, and that Paul Warburg was the Federal Reserve Board! William Jennings Bryan lived long enough to stand aghast at the horrified thought of what his name, in all innocence, had helped to bring into being, but no such shame cast a shadow on the happiness of Warburg and his friends, who now had exclusive power of note issue to the reserve banks, as well as power to fix the discount rate, which meant, of course, power to determine the amount of money in existence. They had conquered America: they were now ready to conquer the world.

It has been suggested that revolution is a good friend to the finance-capitalists, but they have an even better friend-war. War makes them the dictators of mankind. How lucky for them that, the year following the setting up of the Federal Reserve Board, a War should duly have arrived to complete their happiness1 Was has several advantages. It places the nations engaged therein in urgent need of credits, which the financiers can bestow on their own terms. It unsettles things, making it easier to change the masters of a people. And in this particular way it seemed likely that many kings would lose their thrones-a pleasurable thought for those who opposed to the Monarchical State the larger beatitude of the Bankers' State. In particular, and for motives which need nut be investigated in this strictly non-racial treatise, the Kuhn, Loeb bankers had their eye on one monarch whose head, above all others, they wished to see rolled in the sand-the head of the Czar of all the Russians. That is one reason why, in 1914, they were so ardently pro-German and so hostile to Britain. The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 changed all that. Simple people imagine that the Russian Revolution was a protest against just such a system of wicked financial manipulation as I have described. What would be their surprise if they knew that the Bolsheviks were directly subsidized by-can they guess?-Mssrs,. Schiff, Paul Warburg, Max Warburg and the entire Kuhn, Loeb & Company outfit! The first war objective, therefore, was gained when Imperial Russia fell. There was no longer the same reason for hating Britain, especially as Britain had done that which arouses love in the hearts of all true money-lenders-got hopelessly and inextricably into their debt. The late Lord Reading negotiated with the United States a loan of £1,000,000,000, which that optimistic gentleman promised that we should repay on demand and in gold! Thereafter there was no need for the Schiffs and the Warburgs to worry about Britain: we were safely in the bag. And if the war ended with the defeat of Germany and Austria-well, that would be at least two more crowned heads out of the way of a bankers' world state. America duly entered the war on our side!

First fruits of the great victory for the Wall-Street financiers was the extension of their power to Britain and the Dominions, forcing us to surrender our command of the seas, to break our alliance with Japan, and, in a very short time, to return to the gold-standard, after which their associated concerns, such as General Electric, began to acquire our capital assets. They penetrated into every part of Europe and Africa. In China they became supreme in the international financial consortium which was formed to exploit that country. They were active in India. They conquered all South America except the Argentine. And in the United States itself they went from strength to strength by using the mechanism of the Federal Reserve Board for purposes diametrically the opposite from that for which it had supposedly been formed: that is, instead of forwarding supplies of credit when necessary to avoid a panic, they used the opportunity again and again to cut off credit supplies altogether. By such means, in the early twenties, they encouraged the farmers under boom conditions, to borrow and expand their enterprises, and then promptly called in the loans, delivering thousands into bankruptcy. Precisely the same technique caused the panic of 1929, which led to the great crash of 1931. Orthodox economists attribute this later disaster to the failure of the Creditanstalt in Vienna, arguing that it set in motion the whole succession of breakdowns which followed throughout the world. That, however, is a very incomplete picture of the actual situation. Mr. Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Banking and Currency Committee, referring to the New York Stock Exchange collapse which began the American end of the slump, declared: "It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence...the international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as the rulers of us all." Nothing could be less equivocal than that. What cannot be denied is that in 1928 the Federal Reserve Board was feverishly expanding credit to create a boom, and next year as feverishly restricting credit to create a dump. Major C. H. Douglas, in his book, "The Brief for the Prosecution", asserts that the motive of the financiers was to crush the many industrialists who, because of prosperous times, had begun to "muscle-in" on the money lending racket. This is not to argue, of course, that the crisis in the German banking system did not deepen and broaden the slump: the defaulting on reparations in 1931 led directly to the London crash. But even here a decisive part had been played by the Wall-Street manipulators. Throughout the evil Weimar regime in Germany, the American group, in collaboration with their associates in Germany, had been conducting a colossal fraud at the expense of the American people. Worthless German script and much of very little worth were freely accepted, largely through the instrumentality of Paul Warburg, as security far towering cash advances-computed by Mr. McFadden as over 30,000,000,000 dollars beyond the value of all the German bonds-and these advances were poured into Germany (some through Germany into "anti-capitalist" Russia), to make for international usury the most joyous gala period of its long and unsavoury history. The game could not last: what is more, its perpetrators knew that it could not last, and had persuaded President Hoover, in 1931, to stand by with a moratorium to tide their friends in Germany over the worst of their difficulties. Mr. McFadden, speaking of the moratorium, said: "If the German international financiers of Wall Street had not had this job waiting to be done, Herbert Hoover would never have been elected President of the United States." Describing the agency by which the business had been engineered, he told Congress: "We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve Banks. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States...They have been peddling the credit of this Government and the signature of this Government to the swindlers and speculators of all nations. This is what happens when a country forsakes its constitution and gives its sovereignty over public currency to private interests. Give them the flag and they will sell it."

This time, however, the Federal Reserve Board group had overreached itself. Although the result of the world-wide crashes had been to strengthen the power of the big combines everywhere, and greatly to increase bank holdings of industrial stock, the slump nevertheless went too far; much further than it was intended to go. Two signal events proclaimed this fact. First, Great Britain, in a desperate attempt to extricate herself, was forced off gold and obliged to insulate her economy within a sterling area, and a system of Imperial Preference. Repeated attempts have been made by the dollar-manipulators to crash the sterling area: only now are they about to succeed. To this mild but not incompetent British insurrection was added a much more terrifying phenomenon. Out of a Germany devastated by the Money-Power arose-Adolf Hitler.


http://distributist.blogspot.com/2008/1 ... power.html