A synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics

Anonymous · July 25, 2008, 07:24:52 PM

This is one of several version of the manual. I put the important parts in bold. The next post will have my elaboration regarding the allegations of this document.

This one is taken from http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/psychopolitics.html

------------

 
A synthesis of the Russian 
Textbook on Psychopolitics

PSYCHOPOLITICS - the art and 
science of asserting and maintain- 
ing dominion over the thoughts and 
loyalties of individuals, officers, 
bureaus, and masses, and the ef- 
fecting of the conquest of enemy 
nations through "mentalhealing."

EDITORIAL NOTE

From May 2, 1936, to October 10,1939, I was a dues-paying member of the Communist Party, operating under my ownname, Kenneth Goff, and also the alias John Keats. In 1939, I voluntarilyappeared before the Un-American Activities Committee in Washington, D.C.,which was chairmanned at that time by Martin Dies, and my testimony can befound in Volume 9 of that year's Congressional Report.

During the period that I was amember of the Communist Party, I attended their school which was located at 113 E. Wells St., Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and operated underthe name Eugene NameDebs Labor School. Here we were trained in allphases of warfare, both psychological and physical, for the destruction of theCapitalistic society and Christian civilization. In one portion of our studieswe went thoroughly into the matter of psychopolitics. This was the art ofcapturing the minds of a nation through brainwashing and fake mental health --the subjecting of whole nations of people to the rule of the Kremlin bycapturing their minds. We were taught that the degradation of the populace isless inhuman than their destruction by bombs, for to an animal lives only once,any life is sweeter than death. The end of a war is the control of a conqueredpeople. If a people can be conquered in the absence of war, the end of war willhave been achieved without the destructions of war.

During the past few years, I havenoted with horror the increase of psychopolitical warfare upon the Americanpublic. First, in the brainwashing of our boys in Korea, and then in the wellfinanced drive of mental health propaganda by left-wing pressure groups,wherein many of our states have passed Bills which can well be used by theenemies of America to subject to torture and imprisonment, those who preach thegospel of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and who oppose the menace ofCommunism. A clear example of this can be seen in the Lucille Miller case. Inthis warfare the Communists have definitely stated: "You must recruitevery agency of the nation marked for slaughter into a foaming hatred ofreligious healing."

Another example of the warfare thatis being waged can be seen in the attempt to establish a mental Siberia in Alaska, which wa calledfor in the Alaskan Mental Health Bill. A careful study of this Bill will makeyou see at once that the land set aside under the allotment could not be forthat small territory, and the Bill within itself establishes such authoritythat it could be turned into a prison camp under the guise of mental health foreveryone who raises their voice against Communism and the hidden governmentoperating in our own nation.

This book was used in undergroundschools, and contains the address of Beria to the American students in the Lenin Universityprior to 1936. The text in the book in general is from the Communist Manual ofInstructions of Psychopolitical Warfare, and was used in America for thetraining of Communist cadre. The only revision in this book is the summary,which was added by the Communists after the atomic bomb came into being. In itscontents you can see the diabolical plot of the enemies of Christ and America, asthey seek to conquer our nation by subjecting the minds of our people to theirwill by various sinister means.

This manual of the Communist Partyshould be in the hands of every loyal American, that they may be alerted to thefact that it is not always by armies and guns that a nation is conquered.

 Kenneth Goff

 CONTENTS 
 Editorial Note 
 An Address By Lavrent Pavlovich Beria 
 CHAPTER I: 
 The History and Definition of Psychopolitics 
 CHAPTER II: 
 The Constitution of Man as a PoliticalOrganism 
 CHAPTER III: 
 Man as an Economic Organism 
 CHAPTER IV: 
 State Goals for the Individual andMasses 
 CHAPTER V: 
 An Examination of Loyalties 
 CHAPTER VI: 
 The General Subject of Obedience 
 CHAPTER VII: 
 The History and Definition ofPsychopolitics 
 CHAPTER VIII: 
 Degradation, Shock and Endurance 
 CHAPTER IX: 
 The Organization of Mental HealthCampaigns 
 CHAPTER X: 
 Conduct Under Fire 
 CHAPTER XI: 
 The Use of Psychopolitics in SpreadingCommunism 
 CHAPTER XII: 
 Violent Remedies 
 CHAPTER XIII: 
 Recruiting of Psychopolitical Dupes 
 CHAPTER XIV: 
 The Smashing of Religious Groups 
 CHAPTER XV: 
 Proposals Which Must Be Avoided 
 CHAPTER XVI: 
 In Summary

 AN ADDRESS BY LAVRENT PAVLOVICH BERIA

 American students at the Lenin University, I welcomeyour attendance at these classes on Psychopolitics.

 Psychopolitics is an important if less known division of Geo-politics.It is less known because it must necessarily deal with highly educatedpersonnel, the very top strata of "mental healing."

 By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. Toproduce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first mostimportant step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depressionand scientific turmoil. At least a weary populace can seek peace only in ouroffered Communist State, at last onlyCommunism can resolve the problems of the masses.

 A psychopolitician must work hard to produce the maximum chaos in thefields of "mental healing." He must recruit and use all the agenciesand facilities of "mental healing." He must labor to increase thepersonnel and facilities of "mental healing" until at last the entirefield of mental science is entirely dominated by Communist principles anddesires.

 To achieve these goals the psychopolitician must crush every"home-grown" variety of mental healing in America. Actual teachings of James,Eddy and Pentecostal Bible faith healers amongst your mis-guided people must beswept aside. They must be discredited, defamed, arrested, stamped upon even bytheir own government until there is no credit in them and onlyCommunist-oriented "healing" remains. You must work until everyteacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaches only Communist doctrineunder the guise of "psychology.". You must labor until every doctorand psychiatrist is either a psycho-politician or an unwitting assistant to ouraims.

 You must labor until we have dominion over the minds and bodies of everyimportant person in your nation. You must achieve such disrepute for the stateof insanity and such authority over its pronouncement that not one statement solabeled could again be given credence by his people. you must work untilsuicide arising from mental imbalance is common and calls forth no generalinvestigation or remark.

 With the institutions for the insane you have in your country prisonswhich can hold a million persons and can hold them without civil rights or anyhope of freedom. And upon these people can be practiced shock and surgery sothat never again will they draw a sane breath. You must make these treatmentscommon and accepted. And you must sweep aside any treatment or any group ofpersons seeking to treat by effective means.

 You must dominate as respected men the fields of psychiatry andpsychology. You must dominate the hospitals and universities. You must carryforward the myth that only a European doctor is competent in the field ofinsanity and thus excuse amongst you the high incidence of foreign birth andtraining. If and when we seize Vienna,you shall have then a common ground of meeting and can come and take yourinstructions as worshippers of Freud along with other psychiatrists.

 Psychopolitics is a solemn charge. With it you can erase our enemies asinsects. You can cripple the efficiency of leaders by striking insanity intotheir families through the use of drugs. You can wipe them away with testimonyas to their insanity. By our technologies, you can even bring about insanityitself when they seem to resistive.

 You can change their loyalties by psychopolitics. Given a short timewith a psychopolitician you can alter forever their loyalty of a soldier in ourhands or a statesman or a leader in his own country, or you can destroy hismind.

 However, you labor under certain dangers. It may happen that remediesfor our "treatments" may be discovered. It may occur that a publichue and cry may arise against "mental healing." It may thus occurthat all mental healing might be placed in the hands of ministers and taken outof the hands of our psychologists and psychiatrists. But the Capitalisticthirst for control, Capitalistic in-humanity and general public terror ofinsanity can be brought to guard against these things. But should they occur,should independent researchers actually discover means to undo psychopoliticalprocedures, you must not rest, you must not eat or sleep, you must not stintone tiniest bit of available money to campaign against it, dis-credit it ,strike it down and render it void. For by an effective means all our actionsand researches could be undone.

 In a Capitalistic state you are aided on all sides by the corruption ofthe philosophy of man and the times. You will discover that everything will aidyou in your campaign to seize, control and use all "mental healing"to spread our doctrine and rid us of our enemies within their own borders.

 Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country,use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends. Do not stint inyour labor in this direction. And when you have succeeded you will discoverthat you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by carefulorganization of healing societies, by constant campaign about the terrors ofsociety, by pretense as to your effectiveness make you Capitalist himself, byhis own appropriations, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquestof the nation.

 By psychopolitics create chaos. Leave a nation leaderless. Kill ourenemies. And bring to Earth, through Communism, the greatest peace Man has everknown.

 Thank You

 CHAPTER I 
 THE HISTORY AND DEFINITION OF 
 PSYCHOPOLITICS

 Although punishment for its own sake may not be entirely withoutrecompense, it is, nevertheless, true that the end and goal of all punishmentis the indoctrination of the person being punished with an idea, whether thatidea be one of restraint or obedience.

 In that any ruler has, from time beyond memory, needed the obedience ofhis subject in order to accomplish his ends, he has thus resorted topunishment. This is true of every tribe and state in the history of Man. Today, Russianculture has evolved more certain and definite methods of aligning and securingthe loyalties of persons and populace, and of enforcing obedience upon them.This modern outgrowth of old practice is called Psychopolitics.

 The stupidity and narrowness of nations not blessed with Russianreasoning has caused them to rely upon practices which are, today, too ancientand out-moded for the rapid and heroic pace of our time. And in view of thetremendous advance of Russian Culture in the field of mental technologies,begun with the glorious work of Pavlov and carried forward so ably bylater Russians, it would be strange that an art and science would not evolvetotally devoted to the aligning of loyalties and extracting the obedience ofindividuals and multitudes.

 Thus we see that psychopolitical procedures are a natural outgrowthof practices as old as Man, practices which are current in every group ofmen throughout the world. Thus, in psychopolitical procedures there is noethical problem, since it is obvious and evident that Man is alwayscoerced against his will to the greater good of the State, whether byeconomic gains or indoctrination into the wishes and desires of the State.

 Basically, Man is an animal. He is an animal which has been given acivilized veneer. Man is a collective animal, grouped together for his ownprotection before the threat of the environment. Those who so group andcontrol him must have in their possession specialized techniques todirect the vagaries and energies of the animal Man toward greaterefficiency in the accomplishment of the goals of the State.

 Psychopolitics, in one form or another, have long been used in Russia,but the subject is all but unknown outside the borders of our nation, save onlywhere we have carefully transplanted our information and where it is used forthe greater good of the nation.

 The definition of Psychopolitics follows.

 Psychopolitics is the art and science of asserting and maintainingdominion over the thoughts and loyalties of the individuals, officers, bureaus,and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of the enemy nations through"mental healing."

 The subject of Psychopolitics breaks down into several categories, eacha natural and logical proceeding from the last. Its first subject is the constitutionand anatomy of Man, himself, as a political organism. The next is anexamination of Man as an economic organism, as this might becontrolled by his desires. The next is classification of State goals forthe individual and masses. The next is an examination of loyalties. Thenext is the general subject of obedience. The next is the anatomy of thestimulus-response mechanisms of Man. The next is he subjects of shockand endurance. The next is categories of experience. The next is the catalyzingand aligning of experience. The next is the use of drugs. The nextis the use of implantation. The next is the general application ofPsychopolitics within Russia. The next is the organizations outside Russia,their composition and activity. The next is the creation of slave philosophyin a hostile nation. The next is countering anti-psychopolitical activitiesabroad, and the final one, the destiny of psychopolitical rule in ascientific age. To this might be added many sub categories, such as thenullification of modern weapons by psychopolitical activity.

 The strength and power of Psychopolitics cannot be overestimated,particularly when used in a nation decayed by pseudo-intellectualism,where exploitation of the masses combines readily with psychopolitical actions,and particularly where the greed of Capitalistic or Monarchial regimes hasalready brought about an overwhelming incidence of neurosis which can beemployed as the groundwork for psychopolitical action and psychopoliticalcorps.

 It is part of your mission, student, to prevent psychopolitical activityto the detriment of the Russian State, just as it is your mission to carryforward in our nation and outside it, if you are so assigned, the missions andgoals of Psychopolitics. No agent of Russian could be even remotely effectivewithout a thorough grounding in Psychopolitics, and so you carry forward withyou a Russian trust to use well what you are learning here.

 CHAPTER II 
 THE CONSTITUTION OF MAN AS A 
 POLITICAL ORGANISM

 Manis already a colonial aggregation of cells, and to consider him an individualwould be an error. Colonies of cells have gathered together as one organ oranother of the body, and then these organs have, themselves, gathered togetherto form the whole. Thus we see that man, himself, is already a politicalorganism, even if we do not consider a mass of men.

 Sickness could be considered to be a disloyalty to theremaining organisms on the part of one organism. This disloyalty, becomingapparent, brings about a revolt of some part of the anatomy against theremaining whole, and thus we have, in effect, an internal revolution.The heart, becoming disaffected, falls away from close membership and serviceto the remainder of the organism, and we discover the entire body in all of itsactivities is disrupted because of the revolutionary activity of the heart. Theheart is in revolt because it cannot or will not co-operate with the remainderof the body. If we permit the heart thus to revolt, the kidneys, taking theexample of the heart, may in their turn rebel and cease to work for the good ofthe organism. This rebellion, multiplying to the other organs and theglandular system, brings about the death of the "individual." Wecan see with ease that the revolt is death, that the revolt of any part of theorganism results in death. Thus we see that there can be no compromise withrebellion.

 Like the "individual" man, the State is a collection ofaggregations. The political entities within the State must, all of them,co-operate for the greater good of the State lest the State itself fall asunderand die, for with the disaffection of any single distrust we discover anexample set for other districts, and we discover, at length, the entireState falling. This is the danger of revolution.

 Look at Earth. We see here one entire organism. The organism of Earth isan individual organism. Earth has as its organs the various races andnations of men. Where one of these is permitted to remain disaffected, Earthitself is threatened with death. The threatened rebellion of one country,no matter how small, against the total organism of Earth, would find Earthsick, and the cultural state of man to suffer in consequence . Thus, the putrescentillness of Capitalist States, spreading their puss and bacteria into thehealthy countries of the world would not do otherwise than bring about thedeath of Earth, unless these ill organisms are brought into loyalty andobedience and made to function for the greater good of the world-wide State.

 The constitution of Man is so composed that the individual cannotfunction efficiently without the alignment of each and every part and organ ofhis anatomy. As the average individual is incapable, in an unformed anduncultured state, as witness the barbarians of the jungle, so must he betrained into a co-ordination of his organic functions by exercise, education,and work toward specific goals. We particularly and specifically note thatthe individual must be directed from without to accomplish his exercise,education, and work. He must be made to realize this, for only then can he bemade to function efficiently in the role assigned to him.

 The tenets of rugged individualism, personal determinism, self-will,imagination, and personal creativeness are alike in the masses antipatheticto the good of the Greater State. These willful and unaligned forces are nomore than illnesses which will bring about the disaffection, disunity,and at length the collapse of the group to which the individual isattached.

 The constitution of Man lends itself easily and thoroughly to certainand positive regulation from without of all of its functions, including thoseof thinking, obedience, and loyalty, and these things must be controlled if agreater State is to ensue.

 While it may seem desirable to the surgeon to amputate one or anotherlimb or organ in order to save the remainder, it must be pointed out that thisexpediency is not entirely possible of accomplishment where one considersentire nations. A body deprived of organs can be observed to be lessened by itseffectiveness. The world deprived of the workers now enslaved by the insane andnonsensical idiocies of the Capitalists and Monarchs of Earth, would, ifremoved, create a certain disability in the world-wide State. Just as we seethe victor forced to rehabilitate the population of a conquered country at theend of a war, thus any effort to depopulate a disaffected portion of the worldmight have some consequence. However, let us consider the inroad of virus andbacteria hostile to the organism, and we see that unless we can conquer thegerm, the organ or organism which it is attacking will, itself, suffer.

 In any State we have certain individuals who operate in therole of the virus and germ, and these, attacking the population or anygroup within the population, produce, by their self-willed greed, a sicknessin the organ, which then generally spreads to the whole.

 The constitution of Man as an individual body, or the constitution of aState or a portion of the State as a political organism are analogous. It isthe mission of Psychopolitics first to align the obedience and goals of thegroup, and then maintain their alignment by the eradication of theeffectiveness of the persons and personalities which might swerve the grouptowards disaffection. In our own nation, where things are better managedand where reason reigns above all else, it is not difficult to eradicate theself-willed bacteria which might attack one of our political entities. But inthe field of conquest, in nations less enlightened, where the Russian Statedoes not yet have power, it is not as feasible to remove the entire self-willedindividual. Psychopolitics makes it possible to remove that art of hispersonality which, in itself, is making havoc with the person's ownconstitution as well as the group with which the person is connected.

 If the animal man were permitted to continue undisturbed bycounter-revolutionary propaganda, if he were left to work under thewell-planned management of the State, we would discover little sickness amongstMan, and we would discover no sickness in the State. But where theindividual is troubled by conflicting propaganda, where he is made theeffect of revolutionary activities, where he is permitted to thinkthoughts critical of the State itself, where he is permitted to questionof those in whose natural charge he falls, we would discover hisconstitution to suffer. We would discover, from this disaffection, theadditional disaffection of his heart and of other portions of his anatomy;. Socertain is this principle that when one finds a sick individual, could onesearch deeply enough, he would discover a mis-aligned loyalty and aninterrupted obedience to that person's group unit.

 There are those who foolishly have embarked upon some spiritualAlice-in-Wonderland voyage into what they call the "subconscious" orthe "unconscious" mind, and who, under the guise of "psychotherapy"would seek to make well the disaffection of body organs, but it is to benoted that their results are singularly lacking in success. There is nostrength in such an approach. When hypnotism was first invented in Russia,it was observed that all that was necessary was to command the unresistingindividual to be well in order, many times, to accomplish that fact. Thelimitation of hypnotism was that many subjects were not susceptible to itsuses, and thus hypnotism has had to be improved upon in order to increase thesuggestibility of individuals who would not otherwise be reached. Thus, anynation has had the experience of growing well again, as a whole organism, whenplacing sufficient force in play against a disaffected group. Just as inhypnotism any organ can be commanded into greater loyalty and obedience, so canany political group be commanded into greater loyalty and obedience shouldsufficient force be employed. However, force often brings aboutdestruction and it is occasionally not feasible to use broad massforce to accomplish the ends in view. Thus, it is necessary to align theindividual against his desire not to conform.

 Just as it is a recognized truth that Man must conform to hisenvironment, so it is a recognized truth, and will become more so as the yearsproceed, that even the body of Man can be commanded into health.

 The constitution of Man renders itself peculiarly adapted tore-alignment of loyalties. Where these loyalties are indigestible to theconstitution of the individual itself, such as loyalties to the 'petitbourgeoisie,' the Capitalist, to anti-Russian ideas, we find the individualbody peculiarly susceptible to sickness, and thus we can clearly understand theepidemics, illnesses, mass-neuroses, tumults and confusions of the UnitedStates and other capitalist countries. Here we find the workerimproperly and incorrectly loyal, and thus we find the worker ill. To savehim and establish him correctly and properly upon his goal toward a greaterState, it is an overpowering necessity to make it possible for him to grant hisloyalties in a correct direction. In that his loyalties are swerved and hisobedience cravenly demanded by persons antipathetic to his general good, and inthat these persons are few, even in a Capitalist nation, the goal and directionof Psychopolitics is clearly understood. To benefit the worker in such aplight, it is necessary to eradicate, by general propaganda, by other means,and by his own co-operation, and self-willedness of perverted leaders. Itis necessary, as well, to indoctrinate the educated strata into the tenets andprinciples of co-operation with the environment, and thus to insure the workerless warped leadership, less craven doctrine, and more co-operation with theideas and ideals of the Communist State.

 The technologies of Psychopolitics are directed to this end.

 CHAPTER III 
 MAN AS AN ECONOMIC ORGANISM

 Man is subject to certain desires and needs which are as natural tohis being as they are to that of any other animal. Man, however, has the peculiarityof exaggerating some of these beyond the bounds of reason. This is obviousthrough the growth of leisure classes, pseudo-intellectual groups, the"petit bourgeoisie," Capitalism, and other ills.

 It has been said, with truth, that one tenth of a man's life isconcerned with politics and nine-tenths with economics. Without food, theindividual dies. Without clothing, he freezes. Without houses and weapons, heis prey to the starving wolves. The acquisition of sufficient items to answerthese necessities of food, clothing and shelter, in reason, is the naturalright of a member of an enlightened State. An excess of such items brings aboutunrest and disquiet. The presence of luxury items and materials, and theartificial creation and whetting of appetites, as in Capitalist advertising,are certain to accentuate the less-desirable characteristics of Man.

 The individual is an economic organism, in that he requires a certainamount of food, a certain amount of water, and must hold within himself acertain amount of heat in order to live. When he has more food than he can eat,more clothing than he needs to protect him, he then enters upon a certainidleness which dulls his wits and awareness, and makes him prey to difficultieswhich, in a less toxic state, he would have foreseen and avoided. Thus, wehave a glut of being a menace to the individual.

 It is no less different in a group. Where the group acquires too much,its awareness of its own fellows and of the environment is accordingly reduced,and the effectiveness the group in general is lost.

 The maintaining of a balance between gluttony and need is theprovince of Economics proper, and is the fit subject and concern of theCommunist State.

 Desire and want are a state of mind. Individuals can be educated intodesiring and wanting more than they can ever possibly obtain, and suchindividuals are unhappy. Most of the self-willed characteristics of theCapitalists come entirely from greed. He exploits the worker far beyond any necessityon his own part, as a Capitalist, to need.

 In a nation where economicbalances are not controlled, the appetite of the individual is unduly whettedby enchanting and fanciful persuasions to desire, and a type of insanityensues, where each individual is persuaded to possess more than he can use, andto possess it even at the expense of his fellows.

 There is, in economic balances, the other side. Too great and too longprivation can bring about unhealthy desires, which, in themselves, accumulatein left action, more than the individual can use. Poverty, itself, as carefullycultivated in Capitalist States, can bring about an imbalance of acquisition. Justas a vacuum will pull into it masses, in a country where enforced privationupon the masses is permitted, and where desire is artificially whetted, needturns to greed, and one easily discovers in such states exploitation of themany for the benefit of the few.

 If one, by the technologies of Psychopolitics, were to dull theexcessive greed in the few who possess it, the worker would be freed to seek amore natural balance.

 Here we have two extremes. Either one of them are an insanity. If wewish to create an insanity we need only glut or deprive an individual at longlength beyond the ability to withstand and we have a mental imbalance. Asimple example of this is the alternation of too low with too high pressures ina chamber, an excellent psychopolitical procedure. The rapidly varied pressurebrings about a chaos wherein the individual will cannot act and where otherwills then, perforce, assume control.

 Essentially, in an entire country, one must remove the greedy bywhatever means and must then create and continue a semi-privation in the massesin order to command and utterly control the nation.

 A continuous hope for prosperity must be indoctrinated into the masseswith many dreams and visions of glut of commodity and this hope must becounter-played against the actuality of privation and the continuous threat ofloss of all economic factors in case of disloyalty to the State in order tosuppress the individual wills of the masses.

 In a nation under conquest, such as America, our slow and stealthyapproach need take advantage only of the cycles of booms and depressionsinherent in Capitalistic nations in order to assert of more and more strongcontrol over individual wills. A boom is as advantageous as a depressionfor our ends, for during prosperity our propaganda lines must only continue topoint up the wealth the period is delivering to the selected few to divorcetheir control of the State. During a depression one must only point out that itensued as a result of the avarice of a few and the general politicalincompetence of the national leaders.

 The handling of economic propaganda is not properly the sphere ofpsychopolitics but the psychopolitician must understand the economic measuresand Communist goals connected with them.

 The masses must at last come to believe that only excessive taxationof the rich can deliver them of the "burdensome leisure class" andcan thus be brought to accept such a thing as income tax, a Marxist principlesmoothly slid into Capitalistic framework in 1909-1913 in the United States.This, even though the basic law of the United States forbade it and even thoughCommunism at that time had been active only a few years in America. Suchsuccess as the Income Tax law, had it been followed thoroughly could havebrought the United States and not Russia into the world scene as the first Communistnation. But the virility and good sense of the Russian peoples won. It maynot be that the United States will become entirely Communist until past themiddle of the century, but when it does it will be because of our superiorunderstanding of economics and of psychopolitics.

 The Communist agent skilled in economics has as his task thesuborning of tax agencies and their personnel to create the maximumdisturbances and chaos and the passing of laws adapted to our purposes and tohim we must leave this task. The psychopolitical operator plays adistinctly different role in this drama.

 The rich, the skilled in finance,the well informed in government areparticular and individual targets for the psychopolitician. His is the role oftaking off the board those individuals who would halt or corrupt Communisteconomic programs. Thus every rich man, every statesman, ever person wellinformed and capable in government, must have brought to his side as a trustedconfidant, a psychopolitical operator.

 The families of these persons are often deranged from idleness and glutand this fact must be played upon, even created. The normal health and wildnessof a rich man's son must be twisted and perverted and explained intoneurosis and then, assisted by a timely administration of drugs or violence,turned into criminality or insanity. This brings at once someone in"mental healing" into confidential contact with the family and fromthis point on the very most must then be made of that contact.

 Communism could best succeed if at the side of every rich or influentialman there could be placed a psychopolitical operator, an undoubted authority inthe field of "mental healing" who could then by his advice or throughthe medium of a wife or daughter by his guided options direct the optimumpolicy to embroil or upset the economic policies of the country and, when thetime comes to do away forever with the rich or influential man, to administerthe proper drug or treatment to bring about his complete demise in aninstitution as a patient or dead, as a suicide.

 Planted beside a country's powerful persons the psychopolitical operatorcan also guide other policies to the betterment of our battle.

 The Capitalist does not know the definition of war. He thinks of war asattack with force performed by soldiers and machines. He does not know that amore effective if somewhat longer war can be fought with bread or, in our case,with drugs and the wisdom of our art. The Capitalist has never won a war intruth. The psychopolitician is having little trouble winning this one.

 CHAPTER IV 
 STATE GOALS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL AND MASSES

 Just as we would discover an individual to be ill, whose organs, eachone, had a different goal from the rest, so we discover the individuals andthe State to be ill where goals are not rigorously codified and enforced.

 There are those who, in less enlightened times, gave Man to believe thatgoals should be personally sought and held, and that, indeed, Man's entireimpulse toward higher things stemmed from Freedom. We must remember that thesame peoples who embraced this philosophy also continued in Man the myth ofspiritual existence.

 All goals proceed from duress. Life is a continuous escape. Withoutforce and threat, there can be no striving. Without pain, there can be nodesire to escape from pain. Without the threat of punishment, there can be nogain. Without duress and command, there can be no alignment of bodilyfunctions. Without rigorous and forthright control, there ca be no accomplishedgoals for the State.

 Goals of the State should be formulated by the State for the obedienceand concurrence of the individuals within that State. A State without goals soformulated is a sick State. A State without the power and forthright wish toenforce its goals is a sick State.

 When an order is issued by the Communist State, and is not obeyed, asickness will be discovered to ensue. Where obedience fails, the masses suffer.

 State goals depend upon loyalty and obedience for their accomplishment.When one discovers a State goal to be interpreted, one discovers inevitablythat there has been an interposition of self-willedness, of greed, of idleness,or of rugged individualism and self-centered initiative.The interruption ofa State goal will be discovered as having been interrupted by a person whosedisloyalty and disobedience is the direct result of his own mis-alignment withlife.

 It is not always necessary to remove the individual. It is possible toremove his self-willed tendencies to the improvement of the goals and gains ofthe whole. The technologies of Psychopolitics are graduated upon the scalewhich starts somewhat above the removal of the individual himself, upwardtoward the removal only of those tendencies which bring about his lack ofco-operation.

 It is not enough for the State to have goals. These goals, once putforward, depend upon their completion, upon the loyalty and obedience of theworkers. These, engaged for the most part, in hard labors, have little time foridle speculation, which is good. But, above them, unfortunately, there must beforemen of one or another position, and one of whom might have sufficientidleness and lack of physical occupation to cause some disaffectingindependency in his conduct and behaviour.

 Psychopolitics remedies this tendency toward disaffection when itexceeds the common persuasions of the immediate superiors of the person inquestion.

 CHAPTER V 
 AN EXAMINATION OF LOYALTIES

 If loyalty is so important in the economic and social structure, it isnecessary to examine it further as itself.

 In the field of Psychopolitics,loyalty means simply 'alignment.' It means, more fully, alignment with thegoals of the Communist State. Disloyalty means entirely mis-alignment, and morebroadly, mis-alignment with the goals of the Communist State.

 When we consider that the goals of the Communist State are to the bestpossible benefit of the masses, we can see that disloyalty, as a term, canembrace Democratic alignment. Loyalty to persons not communisticallyindoctrinated would be quite plainly a mis-alignment.

 The cure of disloyalty is entirely contained in the principles ofalignment. All that is necessary to do, where disloyalty is encountered, is to alignthe purposes of the individual toward the goals of Communism, and it will bediscovered that a great many circumstances hitherto distasteful in hisexistence will cease to exist.

 A heart, or a kidney in rebellion against the remainder of the organismis being disloyal to the remainder of the organism. To cure the heart orkidney it is actually only necessary to bring its activities into alignmentwith the remainder of the body.

 The technologies of Psychopolitics adequately demonstrate theworkability of this. Mild shock of the electric variety can, and does,produce the re-cooperation of a rebellious body organ. It is the shockand punishment of surgery which, in the main, accomplishes the re-alignmentof a disaffected portion of the body, rather than the surgery itself. It isthe bombardment of X-Rays, rather than the therapeutic value of X-Rays whichcauses some disaffected organ to once again turn its attention to the supportof the general organism.

 While it is not borne out that electric shock has any therapeuticvalue, so far as making the individual more sane, it is adequately brought outthat its punishment value will create in the patient a greater co-operativeattitude. Brain surgery has no statistical data to recommend it beyond itsremoval of the individual personality from amongst the paths of organs whichwere not permitted to co-operate. These two Russian developments have neverpretended to alter the state of sanity. They are only effective and workable inintroducing an adequate punishment mechanism to the personality to make itcease and desist from its courses and egotistical direction of the anatomyitself. It is the violence of the electric shock and the surgery which isuseful in subduing the recalcitrant personality, which is all that stands inthe road of the masses or the State. It is occasionally to be discovered thatthe removal of the preventing personality by shock and surgery then permits theregrowth and re-establishment of organs which have been rebelled against bythat personality. In what a well-regulated state is composed of organisms, notpersonalities, the use of electric shock and brain surgery in Psychopolitics isclearly demonstrated.

 The changing of loyalty consists, in its primary step, of the eradicationof existing loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstratingthat previously existing loyalties have brought about perilous physicalcircumstances, such as imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, or privation,and second by eradicating the personality itself.

 The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination ofthe individual in the belief that his previous loyalties have beengranted to an unworthy source. One of the primary instances in this iscreating circumstances which apparently derive from the target of hisloyalties, so as to rebuff the individual. As part of this there is the creationof a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, andthen furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of hisprevious loyalties is, itself, the course of the duress. Another portion ofthis same method consists of defaming or degrading the individual whoseloyalties are to be changed to the target of his loyalties, i.e., superiorsor government, to such a degree that this target, at length, actually does holdthe individual in disrepute, and so does rebuff him and serve to convince himthat his loyalties have been misplaced. These are the milder methods, but haveproven extremely effective. The greatest drawback in their practice is thatthey require time and concentration, the manufacture of false evidence, and apsychopolitical operator's time.

 In moments of expediency, of which there are many, the personalityitself can be rearranged by shock, surgery, duress, privation, and inparticular, that best of psychopolitical techniques, implantation, with thetechnologies of neo-hypnotism. Such duress must have in its first part adefamation of the loyalties, and in its second, the implantation of newloyalties. A good and experienced psychopolitical operator, working under themost favorable circumstances, can, by the use of psychopolitical technologies,alter the loyalties of an individual so deftly that his own companions will notsuspect that they have changed. This, however, requires considerably more finessethan is usually necessary to the situation. Mass neo-hypnotism can accomplishmore or less the same results when guided by an experienced psychopoliticaloperator. An end goal in such a procedure would be the alteration of theloyalties of an entire nation in a short period of time by mass neo-hypnotism,a thing which has been effectively accomplished among the less-usable states ofRussia.

 It is adequately demonstrated that loyalty is entirely lacking in thatmythical commodity known as 'spiritual quality.' Loyalty is entirely a thingof dependence, economic or mental, and can be changed by the crudestimplementations. Observation of workers in their factories or fieldsdemonstrates that they easily grant loyalty to a foreman or a woman, and thenas easily abandon it and substitute another individual, revulsing, at the sametime, toward the person to whom loyalty was primarily granted. The queasyinsecurity of the masses in Capitalistic nations finds this more common than inan enlightened State, such as Russia. In Capitalistic states, dependenciesare so craven, wants and privations are so exaggerated, that loyalty isentirely without ethical foundation and exists only in the realm of dependency,duress, or demand.

 It is fortunate that Communism so truly approaches an ideal state ofmind, for this brings a certain easiness into any changing loyalties, since allother philosophies extant and practiced on Earth today are degraded anddebased, compared to Communism. It is then with a certain security that apsychopolitical operator functions, for he knows that he can change the loyaltyof an individual to a more ideal level by reason alone, and only expediencymakes it necessary to employ the various shifts of psychopolitical technology. Anyman who cannot be persuaded into Communist rationale is, of course, to beregarded as somewhat less than sane, and it is, therefore completely justifiedto use the techniques of insanity upon the non-Communist.

 In order to change loyalty it is necessary to establish first theexisting loyalties of the individual. The task is made very simple in view ofthe fact that Capitalistic and Fascistic nations have no great security inthe loyalty of their subjects. And it may be found that the loyalties ofthe subjects, as we call any person against whom psychopolitical technology isto be exerted, are already too faint to require eradication. It is generallyonly necessary to persuade with the rationale and overwhelming reasonability ofCommunism to have the person grant his loyalty to the Russian State. However,regulated only by the importance of the subject, no great amount of time shouldbe expended upon the individual, but emotional duress, or electric shock, orbrain surgery should be resorted to, should Communist propaganda persuasionfail. In a case of a very important person, it may be necessary to utilizethe more delicate technologies of Psychopolitics so as to place the personhimself, and his associates, in ignorance of the operation. In this case asimple implantation is used, with a maximum duress and command value. Only themost skilled psychopolitical operator should be employed on such a project, asin this case of the very important person, for a bungling might disclose thetampering with his mental processes. It is much more highly recommended,if there is any doubt whatever about the success of an operation against animportant person, to select out as a psychopolitical target persons in hisvicinity in whom he is emotionally involved. His wife or children normallyfurnish the best targets, and these can be operated against without restraint.In securing the loyalty of a very important person one must place at his side aconstant pleader who enters a sexual or familial chord into the situationon the side of Communism. It may not be necessary to make a Communist out ofthe wife, or the children, or one of the children, but it might proveefficacious to do so. In most instances, however, this is not possible. Bythe use of various drugs, it is, in this modern age, and well within therealm of psychopolitical reality, entirely too easy to bring about a stateof severe neurosis or insanity in the wife or children, and thus passthem, with full consent of the important person, and the government inwhich he exists, or the bureau in which he is operating, into the hands of apsychopolitical operator, who then in his own laboratory, without restraint orfear of investigation or censor, can, with electric shock, surgery,sexual attack, drugs, or other useful means, degrade or entirely alter thepersonality of a family member, and create in that person a psychopoliticalslave subject who, then, on command or signal, will perform outrageousactions, thus discrediting the important person, or will demand, on a moredelicate level, that certain measures be taken by the important person, whichmeasures are, of course, dictated by the psychopolitical operator.

 Usually when the party has no real interest in the activities ofdecisions of the important person, but merely wishes to remove him fromeffective action, the attention of the psychopolitical operator need not tobe so intense, and the person need only be passed into the hands of someunwitting mental practitioner, who taught as he is by psychopoliticaloperators, will bring about sufficient embarrassment.

 When the loyalty of an individual cannot be swerved, and wherethe opinion, weight, or effectiveness of the individual stands firmly in theroad of Communist goals, it is usually best to occasion a mild neurosis in theperson by any available means, and then, having carefully given him a historyof mental imbalance, to see to it that he disposes of himself by suicide, orby bringing about his demise in such a way as to resemble suicide. Psychopoliticaloperators have handled such situations skillfully tens of thousands of times,within and without Russia.

 It is a firm principle of Psychopolitics that the person to be destroyedmust be involved at first or second hand in the stigma of insanity, and musthave been placed in contact with psychopolitical operators or persons trainedby them, with a maximum amount of tumult and publicity. The stigma ofinsanity is properly placed at the door of such persons' reputations and isheld there firmly by bringing about irrational acts, either on his own part orin his vicinity. Such an activity can be classified as a partialdestruction of alignment, and if this destruction is carried forward to itsfurthest extent the mis-alignment on the subject of all loyalties can beconsidered to be complete, and alignment on new loyalties can be embarked uponsafely. By bringing about insanity or suicide on the part of the wife of animportant political personage, a sufficient mis-alignment has been instigatedto change his attitude. And this, carried forward firmly, or assisted bypsychopolitical implantation can begin the rebuilding of his loyalties, but nowslanted in a more proper and fitting direction.

 Another reason for the alignment of psychopolitical activities with themis-alignment of insanity in that insanity, itself, is a despised and disgracedstate, and anything connected with it is lightly viewed. Thus, a psychopoliticaloperator, working in the vicinity of an insane person, can refute and disproveany accusations made against him by demonstrating that the family itself istainted with mental imbalance. This is surprisingly effective inCapitalistic countries where insanity is so thoroughly feared that no onewould dream of investigating any circumstances in its vicinity. Psychopoliticalpropaganda works constantly and must work constantly to increase and build upthis aura of mystery surrounding insanity, and must emphasize the horriblenessof insanity in order to excuse non-therapeutic actions taken against theinsane. Particularly in Capitalistic countries, an insane person has norights under law. No person who is insane may hold property. No person who isinsane may testify. Thus, we have an excellent road along which we cantravel toward our certain goal and destiny.

 Entirely by bringing about public conviction that the sanity of aperson is in question, it is possible to discount and eradicate all of thegoals and activities of that person. By demonstrating the insanity of agroup, or even a government, it is possible, then, to cause its people todisavow it. By magnifying the general human reaction to insanity, throughkeeping the subject of insanity, itself, forever before the public eye, andthen, by utilizing this reaction by causing a revulsion on the part of apopulace against its leader or leaders, it is possible to stop any governmentor movement.

 It is important to know that the entire subject of loyalty is thus aseasily handled as it is. One of the first and foremost missions of thepsychopolitician is to make an attack upon Communism and insanitysynonymous. It should become the definition of insanity, of the paranoidvariety, that "A paranoid believes he is being attacked byCommunists." Thus, at once the support of the individual so attackingCommunism will fall away and wither.

 Instead of executing national leaders, suicide for them should bearranged under circumstances which question their demise. In this way we canselect out all opposition to the Communist extension into the social orders ofthe world, and render populace who would oppose us leaderless, and bring abouta state of chaos or mis-alignment into which we can thrust, with great simplicity,the clear and forceful doctrines of Communism.

 The cleverness of our attack in this field of Psychopolitics is adequateto avoid the understanding of the layman and the usual stupid official, and by operatingentirely under the banner of authority, with the oft-repeated statementthat the principles of psychotherapy are too devious for common understanding,an entire revolution can be effected without the suspicion of a populace untilit is an accomplished fact.

 As insanity is the maximum mis-alignment, it can be grasped to be themaximum weapon in severance of loyalties to leaders and old social orders.Thus, it is of the utmost importance that psychopolitical operative infiltratethe healing arts of a nation marked for conquest, and bring that quartercontinuous pressure against the population and the government until at last theconquest is affected. This is the subject and goal of Psychopolitics, itself.

 In rearranging loyalties we must have a command of their values. Inthe animal the first loyalty is to himself. This is destroyed bydemonstrating errors to him, showing him that he does not remember,cannot act or does not trust himself. The second loyalty is to his familyunit, his parents and brothers and sisters. This is destroyed by makinga family unit economically non-dependent, by lessening the value ofmarriage, by making an easiness of divorce and by raising thechildren whenever possible by the State. The next loyalty is to his friendsand local environment. This is destroyed by lowering his trust andbringing about reportings upon him allegedly by his fellows or the townor village authorities. The next is to the State and this, for the purposes ofCommunism, is the only loyalty which should exist once the state is founded as aCommunist State. To destroy loyalty to the State all manner of forbidding foryouth must be put into effect so as to disenfranchise them as members of theCapitalist state and, by promises of a better lot under Communism, to gaintheir loyalty to a Communist movement.

 Denying a Capitalist country easy access to courts, bringing aboutand supporting propaganda to destroy the home, creating and continuous juveniledelinquentcy, forcing upon the state all manner of practices to divorce thechild from it will in the end create chaos necessary to Communism.

 Under the saccharine guise of assistance to them, rigorous childlabor laws are the best means to deny the child any right in society. By refusingto let him earn, by forcing him into unwanted dependence upon agrudging parent, by making certain in other channels that the parent isnever in other than economic stress, the child can be driven in his teensinto revolt. Delinquency will ensue.

 By making readily available drugs of various kinds, by giving theteen-ager alcohol, by praising his wildness, by stimulatinghim with sex literature and advertising to him or her practices as taughtat the Sexpol, the psychopolitical operator can create the necessaryattitude of chaos, idleness and worthlessness into which can then be castthe solution which will give the teen ager complete freedom everywhere--Communism.

 Should it be possible to continue conscription beyond any reasonabletime by promoting unpopular wars and other means, the draft can always stand asa further barrier to the progress of youth in life, destroying any immediatehope to participate in his nation's civil life.

 By these means the patriotism of youth for their Capitalisticflag can be dulled to a point where they are no longer dangerous as soldiers.While this might require many decades to effect, Capitalisms short term viewwill never envision the lengths across which we can plan.

 If we could effectively kill the national pride and patriotism ofjust one generation, we will have won that country. Therefore, there mustbe continual propaganda abroad to undermine the loyalty of the citizens ingeneral and the teen-ager in particular.

 The role of the psychopolitical operator in this is very strong. He can,from his position as an authority on the mind, advise all manner of destructivemeasures. He can teach the lack of control of this child at home. He caninstruct, in an optimum situation, the entire nation in how to handle children-- and instruct them so that the children, given no control, given no realhome, can run wildly about with no responsibility for their nation orthemselves.

 The mis-alignment of the loyalty of youth to a Capitalistic nation setsthe proper stage for a realignment of their loyalties toward Communism. Creatinga greed for drugs, sexual misbehavior and uncontrolled freedom and presentingthis to them as a benefit of Communism, will with ease, bring about ouralignment.

 In the case of strong leaders amongst youthful groups, a psychopoliticaloperator can work in many ways to use or discard that leadership. If it is tobe used, the character of a girl or boy must be altered carefully into criminalchannels and a control by blackmail, or other means, must be maintained. Butwhere the leadership is not susceptible, where it resists all persuasions andmight become dangerous to our Cause, no pains must be spared to direct theattention of the authorities to that person and to harass him in one way oranother until he can come into the hands of the juvenile authorities. Whenthis has been effected, it can be hoped that a psychopolitical operator, byreason of child advisor status, can, in the security of the jail and cloakedby processes of law, destroy the sanity of that person. Particularlybrilliant scholars, athletes and youth group leaders must be handled in eitherone of these two ways.

 In the matter of guiding the activities of juvenile courts, thepsychopolitical operator entertains here one of his easier tasks. ACapitalistic nation is so filled with injustice in general that a little morepasses without comment. In juvenile courts there are always persons withstrange appetites whether these be judges or police man or women. If suchdo not exist, they can be created. By making available to them young girlsor boys in the "security" of the jail or the detention home and byappearing with flash cameras or witnesses one becomes equiped with a whipadequate to direct all the future decisions of that person when these areneeded.

 The handling of youth cases by courts should be led further andfurther away from law and further and further into "mental problems"until the entire nation thinks of "mental problems" instead ofcriminals. This places vacancies everywhere in the courts, in the offices ofdistrict attorneys, or police staffs which could then be filled withpsychopolitical operators and these become the judges of the land by theirinfluence and into their hands comes the total control of the criminal, withoutwhose help a revolution cannot ever be accomplished.

 By stressing this authority over the problems of youth and adults incourts one day the demand for psychopolitical operators could become such thateven the armed services will use "authorities on the mind" to worktheir various justices and when this occurs, the armed forces of the nationthen enter into our hands as solidly as if we commanded them ourselves. Withthe slight bonus of having thus a skilled interrogator near every technician orhandler of secret war apparatus, the country, in event of revolution, as didGermany in 1918 and 1919 will find itself immobilized by its own Army and Navyfully and entirely in Communist hands.

 Thus the subject of loyalties and their re-alignment is in fact thesubject of non-armed conquest of an enemy.

 
CHAPTER VI 
THE GENERAL SUBJECT OF OBEDIENCE

Obedience is the result of force.

Everywhere we look in the history ofthe Earth we discover that obedience to new rulers has come about entirelythrough the demonstration on the part of those rulers of greater force thanwas to be discovered in the old ruler. A population overridden, conquered bywar, is obedient to its conqueror. It is obedient to its conqueror becauseits conqueror has exhibited more force.

Concurrent with force is brutality,for there are human considerations involved which also represent force. Themost barbaric, unrestrained, brutal use of force, if carried far enough,invokes obedience. Savage force, sufficiently long displayed toward anyindividual, will bring about his concurrence with any principle or order.

Force is the antithesis ofhumanizing actions. It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness,lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display aninhuman attitude toward people, to be granted by those people the possession offorce.

Any organization which has thespirit and courage to display inhumanity, savageness, brutality, and anuncompromising lack of humanity, will be obeyed. Such a use of force is, itself, theessential ingredient of greatness. We have to hand no less an example toour great Communist Leaders, who, in moments of duress and trial, when faced byCzarist rule, continued over the heads of an ensla

Anonymous · July 25, 2008, 07:27:41 PM

People attempt to discredit the manual by associating it with L Ron Hubbard as an invention he created to formulate his Co$ cult. They are limited in their scope, using prejudicial convictions that he was the one to have created it because that is how scientology brainwashes its followers. What they lack is information we know. Such as, what Communists did in Russia, the truth about mind control techniques, and who created Communism! Given their lack of insight in these matters it is easy for them to conclude the manual was created by Hubbard as a fabrication, to send out to the authorities to scare them into possibly exacerbating ties with Russia to create WW3. This is a limited scope of the issue given the information at hand.

L Ron Hubbard was not an originator of any concept he used and claimed as his own. Every concept from Scientology that he claims to have created comes from other sources that he plagiarized: http://www.lermanet.com/sources.htm. His son discussed how much of the concepts later created came form others, not Hubbard: http://www.lermanet.com/exit/manney/mb-on-the-brainwashing-manual.htm.

A report to "prove" he created the whole Brainwashing manual provides this info:

QuoteJohn Sanborn was the editor of several of Hubbard's
Dianetic and Scientology books, and an editor of
Scientology publications during the 1950s. He left Scientology
in the early 1980s. In 1986 he recounted the
inception of the Brainwashing Manual:
"I suggested it. Just kidding around on his front porch
[on] Sligo Avenue in Silver Spring, Maryland. Talking about
how are we going to 'get' these psychiatrists. I said, 'What
we need to do is take over their subject. What we need to do
is put out a manual of psych-military something or other... as
coming from the Communists, and then put a lot of psychiatry
in it.'
"And we're sitting there, with our chairs tipped back on
the front porch, tipped up against the house, with our feet up
on the railing, and all of a sudden he comes down on his
chair and he grabs me.
"And I thought, 'I've had it.'
"And he said, 'That's it!'
"Then he disappeared into this little front room which
was sort of a bedroom and study, and you could hear him
in there dictating this book."
The method of writing by dictating into a tape
recorder had earlier been used by Hubbard. It was a
method he would use, intermittently, over the years that
followed.

http://www.lermanet.com/exit/manney/Bra ... allels.pdf

I was going to articulate the reasoning I derived from that admission about him dictating the manual and how it doesn't prove he was the creator of it, but in trying to uncover the truth about the manual I came across a poster who said it pretty well along with other reasoning I had thought of:

QuotePosted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:59 pm Post subject:
________________________________________
I just want to represent an opposing view that is Hubbard plagiarized this book, rewrote a few lines to spin it for his efforts, and dictated the "new" book into a recording device. Supposedly L Ron Jr. stated he watched his father dictate this book into a machine. This supports the view that Hubbard just changed a few wordings and "re-wrote" the book, then read it to be worked up and "published".

It is my opinion the subject matter of this book was well outside Hubbard's scope of expertise and intelligence level. I believe just as all his other "discoveries", he plagiarized another's work with his own "spin" and used it.

I understand the original writer of TBWM has been researched in-depth by a few book historians, and the consensus is the truth will never be known on the matter. Here is what I see and think. Experts in the field don't believe Hubbard wrote the book for various and valid reasons. They are looking at it objectively, and have no motivation to "Demonize" Hubbard. One of the primary "proofs" used by critics in the past to show Hubbard as the author was stating a man's death in the late 1940's, who was then proved to have died in the early '70's. This was in fact who I believe, and who himself claimed, ...wrote the book. Kenneth Goff.

Hubbard did with Goff's work just as he did with everyone's else's work, plagiarized it. Hubbard also learned from Goff's work further how to build his "mind-control" cult. Hubbard wasn't intelligent enough to write TBWM. He was intelligent enough to read it and use it.

Hubbard's motive to re-write a very few lines to include Dia/Scn and attempt to deciminate the book with false discretion was to protray Dia/Scn as a super capable mental technology that even the "Commies" were concerned with. This was in the '50's and Hubbard still had hopes of "selling" his hoax to the Feds.

Hubbard even tried again as late as the sixties by offering Pres. Kennedy's staff free access to his "tech'. This resulted in brother Bobby, the Attorney General, producing a raid on the DC Org.

My two bits.

http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php ... c&start=45

This is also discussed here: http://www.religio.de/publik/arsreview/131096.html with this of primary importance to what I am discussing:

Quote"The book appears some time in the 1930s, and is used by (if not written by) Kenneth Goff to speak against Communism and for Pentecostal Christianity. Later he adds an afterward on atomic bombs, to update the red menace. When L. Ron Hubbard had need of the book in the 1950s, he reads it into a transcription machine as if he 'wrote' it. Initially he removes references to Pentecostal Christianity and faith healing and does not speak entirely unkindly of Freud; later on he demonizes psychiatry more than Communism. The John Birch Society uses the book for their ends, as do the Vampire Killers. Hubbard did indeed 'write' 'Brain-Washing' - but so did Kenneth Goff, the John Birch Society, the authors of Vampire Killers 2000 and probably many others."

Another relevant analysis is:

QuoteThe "Manual" was reprinted some twenty times, and quoted even more often; it played an important role in the discussion on brainwashing. The question of its authorship remains controversial. A curious character, Kenneth Goff (1909-1972), constantly claimed that he was the one who compiled it. Goff was a member of the U.S. Communist Party in the 1930s. He later converted to Fundamentalist Protestantism, only to evolve later towards anti-Semitism, neo-Nazism, and Identity Churches [3]. In the 1940s and 1950s Goff published several autobiographical books and pamphlets, where he graphically described both his conversion and his previous "conditioning" as an American communist by Soviet agents[4]. In 1955, the "Manual" (without mentioning Goff at all) was published by the Church of Scientology, with the indication "Published as a public service by the Church of Scientology", and with an "editorial note" signed by a professor Charles Stickley, about whom no information is available (in all the other editions, there is also an "editorial note", but Goff is indicated as its author)[5]. Both the early Goff edition, and the edition published by Scientology, include references to Christian Science and Dianetics as groups that Communist psychopolitics should try to discredit; the Goff version also includes Pentecostals, not mentioned in the Scientology edition.

Critics of Scientology have no doubt that the book was authored by Lafayette Ronald ("L. Ron") Hubbard (1911-1986), the founder of both Dianetics and Scientology. For example, Bent Corydon is very positive when he claims, based on a statement by Hubbard's son L. Ron Hubbard Jr. (Ron DeWolf, 1934-1991), that "Dad wrote every word of it", having apparently been influenced by John Sanborn (1922-) who at the time assisted Hubbard in editing his works[6]. (Subsequently, DeWolf was to state under oath that Corydon had incorrectly quoted many of his statements.) This version has been repeated by countless anti-Scientology works, and has been even quoted as a "confession" by Hubbard that he did indeed know about brainwashing.

http://www.cesnur.org/2005/brainwash_13.htm

If you take this into account, it does appear that the anti-Co$ers – although rightly distraught about the popularity of Co$ - are not going about exposing the manual in a rational manner. They are convinced Hubbard created the manual because Co$ has developed in line with the techniques in the manual, failing to think of other logical originations for the manual. I first heard of the Operation Clambake and the associated Anonymous hackers a few months ago when someone I knew was all up in arms about how great it was that Co$ was hacked... but I couldn't care less, it was fairly inconsequential to me in comparison to Zionism and the whole NWO agenda. These Anonymous hackers are juvenile from what I gathered upon looking at their site, despite the great efforts to dismantle the pathetic Co$ cult. One issue I brought up with the person who cared about the hacking on Co$, was why aren't these guys taking down more important sites by hacking them? Why waste time on this bullshit Co$? Grow the fuck up! We got bigger problems children!

Furthermore, if you look at how Communism was a real threat, given the infiltration of its ideologies from "Jewish" and non-"Jewsish" traitors alike; how many of the mechanisms discussed in the manual have been implemented - or have had attempts at implementation, and some have not been implemented, yet, due to public or non-compromised governmental opposition - in the USA; how the "left" was infiltrated; how the "right" was infiltrated; how we are in effect largely a communist-capitalist amalgamation in our current state of affairs in Canada and the USA, this manual is very accurate. L Ron Hubbard is a plagiarist and did not have the intellectual capability to create such a revealing document about brainwashing techniques. He used it, changed it to "write" it again, and pawned it off as if he compiled it using a pseudo-pen name "Charles Stickley" with Co$ publishing it.

For example a recent 2001 re-issue of the manual with a new Introduction written in 1991:

QuoteThe following treatise on communist brainwashing, which has
been published and republished since the 1930s, is an edited version
of an actual textbook on Russian "psychopolitics." It was used as a
primer, here in America, to teach communist agents how to brainwash
people, and, in fact, how to subvert entire populations. While
the wording of this particular treatise—and there are any number of
them—may or may not be completely authentic, two things are historically
certain: 1) Such brainwashing activities really occurred, and
2) this volume accurately conveys the principles and techniques
employed.
Today it is fashionable to consider the twin Soviet threats of the
past—nuclear attack, and subversion of America's people and institutions—
as having been either exaggerated by the West, or downright
imagined in the first place. Yet, ironically, the upheaval in the
communist world is bringing with it startling revelations confirming
many of the most serious accusations ever made against Moscow.
For instance, two major books were recently published detailing for
the first time Soviet complicity in America's drug epidemic. It turns
out that all those "paranoid, right wing" fears that the Soviets were
intent on demoralizing America's youth through drugs were well
founded. For years, America's liberal intelligentsia considered such
notions as paranoid delusions.
An objective look at the state of America today—her institutions,
her socialistic political-economic drift, her young people's values—
shows precisely the results that the Soviets, for decades, bragged
they wanted to achieve. It is almost as though, while communism is
dying (as a political system) throughout most of the world, the seeds
of corruption it planted here in the U.S. have germinated and borne
bitter fruit.
Don't take my word for it. Read the following treatise on psychopolitics,
and see whether the conditions predicted back then are
not exactly what America faces today at the turn of the century.
Consider the methods described herein—the degradation of youth
through sex and drugs, the seduction of this nation's media, educational,
and religious institutions, the discrediting of her leaders—and
decide for yourself whether or not they are the very means that have
been employed to accomplish these ends.
Is it possible that the disastrous discrediting of America's values
that has taken place over the last three decades has not been some
sort of accident, but that it has been the deliberate development of an
agenda? I leave the reader to determine that for himself.
It is my hope that contemplating what is written here will help
each individual, and ultimately our nation, to rediscover the moral
principles that once made America shine so brightly, and hopefully
will do so once again.
Roy Masters
August 16, 1991

There are many who claim the manual is not from Hubbard but is a right-wing neo-Nazi tool used to fuel their delusions about how they wrongfully and falsely perceived Communism to be the enemy (I wonder where we fit in LOL). This blog post claims the manual to be authentic but to have been "smuggled" out of Russia for the purpose of disinformation by the Soviets themselves into creating hysteria in America: http://professorsmile.blogspot.com/2006/01/hubbard-scientology-brainwashing_29.html So apparently we suffer from right wing delusions if we take this information seriously... I guess some "lefties" are really brainwashed by their self-denial. So even when some find evidence that shows Hubbard did not originally create the manual, they must excuse is it as fiction in another form by playing the left-right paradigm.

The report "Chaos and Terror – Manufactured by Psychiatry – Report and Recommendations on the psychiatry in international terrorism" published by Citizens Commission on Human Rights uses the manual as a reference for the findings and explanation of the situation. So clearly there is even some mainstream acknowledgement in the validity of the mind control mechanism discussed in the manual.

Some pictures from this thread: http://infowarsforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=9391&sid=0e06f66eb3269

Benjamin Rush: American, invented tranquilizer chair.

Pavlov under Stalin.

Ernst Rudin: NAZI Psychiatrist, head of NAZI Eugenics program

Do you trust psychiatrists? I didn't even before reading this manual. I saw/see the profession as a means of projecting their own delusions about others onto their patients and create an industry for big pharma to make billions of dollars. They are just as useless as lawyers, and somewhat more evil for the direct damage inflicted upon the biological makeup of the brains and psyche of the individuals affected by these poisons. You aren't "happy" with society but can't figure out why? Go to the shrink and he will make you all better! Go back to sleep! Sedate you discontent until you no longer think about how fucked up things are!

When I read the manual I kept thinking of Orwell's 1984 style torture that Winston went through to brainwash him. And eventually you see information that relates to how the control is maintained on current authorities - via blackmail on many fronts - on par with Kay Griggs' talks.

So make up your own minds about its validity; whether as an original self-released propaganda to create hysteria, as a fraudulent L. Ron Hubbard creation, or as a Revelation of the Method on how things were going to progress in our Occidental societies to bring about the world control grid. It would certainly be an effective way to maintain control of a populace in a world government complex. You can surmise who these psychopolitical controllers/handlers are in our day.

Anonymous · July 25, 2008, 07:35:00 PM

A slightly different version, with it's own bold highlights at http://insights2.org/nesara/Psychopolitics.html has this important introductory analysis to the manual that shows the parallels of the claims made in the manual with the events since its release that indicate the validity of the claims therein:

------------

Editor's note: The following information is reprinted from the Phoenix Journal - "Burnt Offerings And Bloodstained Sands, Psychopolitics and The Sacrifice Of The Phoenix" [pages 7 to 67]

H: Let me give you some thoughtful information presented by one I greatly honor:
QUOTE:
Americans, who have been watching the degeneration of our society, the increase in violence, drugs, pornography, and the national debt, often write us for advice about what to do "once the nation falls" into socialism, insolvency and surrender. Some use the forbidden 'C' word, by asking what they should do "when the communists take over." My friends, when the Thought-theology (psychopolitics) of what we understand is communism finally takes over in America, it will NOT be called by that name. The Hammer and Sickle will probably never adorn any flag. (Communism will be called Democracy and accepted by most Americans with dancing in the streets)

Does this sound preposterous? Think about it. How would you know 'when communism, sold as democracy,' is the ultimate law of the land? If those who are now employing more powerful levers and more subtle webs succeed in their plans, most of those living in this country may not notice much of a difference from what they think of as the American Way these days!
Karl Marx, the Jewish hippie who invented what is known today as 'Scientific socialism', was not himself a communist and never claimed to be one. Mr. Marx, it is now known, collaborated with some wealthy totalitarian socialists, and they let him put his name on their joint effort, and it was titled, THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. It was a scheme of powerful levers and subtle webs. There is so little difference between socialism and communism that 70 years after the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO was published, Lenin, the socialist founder of modern communism, called himself a communist but named Russia and other conquered territories the Union of Socialist Republics. Regardless of what communism is called, it would be identified by at least ten basic planks as set forth in the MANIFESTO. These political planks need to be listed here, not only as a review but as a template by which to gauge the American government and policies today.
(Hatonn: I have already given you all of these but perhaps you will see and hear more clearly if they are again laid forth from Earth-man)

1. ABOLITION OF PROPERTY IN LAND AND APPLICATION OF ALL RENTS TO PUBLIC USE.
Did you know that the Federal Government of Washington, D.C. now owns over 40% of the land mass of the United States? That is more land than the entire country east of the Mississippi River. It does so in direct violation of the United States Constitution. The Federal Government now owns more than 10% of all industrial properties, and owns railroads, barge lines, etc. As the government buys more and more land, this property is taken off the tax rolls, and this increases the taxes all of us must pay on the land we suppose that we own. Most Americans think that they own their land. They think that a certain parcel upon which they live actually belongs to them. Have your lawyer explain to you why your deeds have been drawn as they have or why you and your wife are called 'tenants in common" and other strange language and phrases. Here is the rule of law: If you must pay the state or county a 'property tax', and the state or county can sell your property to someone else if you fail to pay the tax, you are not the actual and lawful owner of that land or property. Marx called the use tax on land, rent. Today it is called 'property tax' and while universally accepted by most Americans, the property tax is 100% Marxist (communist) in nature. How then will you know when "communism takes over"?

The land that is still informally held in private hands, is now subject to state and municipal controls called 'land use' and you can only do certain things on land that you suppose you own. If you actually owned it, instead of being merely a "tenant with a vested interest in it", no city, state or federal controls could be imposed upon it. Yet, you accept zoning restrictions as normal and allow the city to impose 'rent controls'. You sit tight when the Federal Government tells you, via an unconstitutional statute, that you must rent 'your property' to anyone who comes to your door, regardless of race, color, national origin and sexual preference. From where did they get the lawful jurisdiction to tell you what you can do on 'your property'? If indeed it is your property, there is no such authority except that which you voluntarily submit to. However, since you are merely a tenant paying property use tax rent on the land, they have every right to tell you how you will use that property and how far from the property line you must build any house, etc. Can you imagine Patrick Henry putting up with such nonsense? Of course not! But then, Patrick Henry was a Freeman, not a communist. He did not hold communist ideas about the use of land, as most Americans today do. How about you? Are you a communist when it comes to land use? As to the use of land, every Senator and every Congressman is a communist today. Nothing much will change "when communism takes over", except that you will know that you are a mere tenant and not a land owner as you had supposed for years. Some of you tenants will be pushed off the state's land so that another tenant can use your nice home and farm and if you illegally resist, you may be legally shot.
When the communist agent, Woodie Guthrie, wrote the now famous song, This Land is My Land; this Land is Your Land... he was writing with the communist understanding about land and land ownership. Yet patriotic groups, ignorant of communist objectives, often sing that song with the same attitude and reverence as they do with America, the Beautiful. Good grief!

2. A HEAVY PROGRESSIVE OR GRADUATED INCOME TAX.
This is probably the best known of the Marxist-Communist political concepts in use today in America. If there is any communist statute or regulation that has been imposed unlawfully on most Americans, and one which affects their very lives and fortunes the most, the communist income tax has to be it. If there was any statute that employed more powerful levers" or "subtle webs", you would be hard pressed to find it. As with the progressive tax on property, it is a communist idea of "from each according to his ability and to each according to his need" that finds exact expression in the federal and state graduated income tax laws. Yet 90% of all Americans accept that system of federal revenue taxation as if it were both Scriptural and American. It is neither. It comes from the Babylonian Talmud, and is the main cornerstone of communist Thought-theology, Marxism-Leninism is not only a political thought, but is also the religion of the communist-socialist. I was sitting at a restaurant meal with two Baptist ministers and their wives recently. These men had come to see me regarding several theological opinions that I hold and set forth in STAR WARS 4. During the discussion, the subject of the Marxist federal income tax came up, and I stated that I had not filed a return in over 20 years. One of the minister's wives blurted right out, "I think I should turn you in!" Here was a woman claiming to be a Christian who was perfectly at ease turning in another Christian to the federal authorities over the matter of a communist taxing system! What did the two ministers say concerning the outburst from this wife? Nothing. Now, how could they understand the deeper meanings of STAR WARS 4 when they were functional communists in Thought-theology (Psychopolitics)? Here is a plank of the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO so ingrained in their sub-conscious minds that they were silent when this woman suggested that I be turned over to the authorities! It is a well-known hallmark of communism when you see people turning in their neighbors to the authorities. It is now beginning on a large scale in America with such carefully prepared TV shows as UNSOLVED MYSTERIES, where the TV uses brutal murders, drug and child abuse crimes to get the public accustomed to thinking about turning people in so as to solve these crimes. You will become a 'state hero' and even paid $1,000 for your help. Next, you will be paid for turning in people who own firearms or teach the citizenry about unlawful government activities. Will you really recognize the point "when communism takes over?"

3. ABOLITION OF ALL RIGHT TO INHERITANCE.
In spite of the federal Estate Tax of 1916, your Marxist government has yet to accomplish this objective. They have imposed a heavy inheritance tax, illegally confiscating a large part of that property a man leaves to his children. After a couple of generations, the property is gone. How many people do you know who still live on their grandfather's farm or ranch? Naturally, the lower classes, who have chosen not to save enough to purchase property, have no inheritances to leave. The super-rich have been provided the use of tax-exempt foundations so that their wealth is passed on to their posterity. It is the great middle-class that the Marxist objectives are directed toward, and which succeed very well in America. Where does the federal government get the authority and jurisdiction to tax the property of the deceased?

4. CONFISCATION OF THE PROPERTY OF EMIGRANTS AND REBELS.
Emigrants are people who leave a country, and that does not apply to Americans. However, look at what is done to Americans your government calls 'rebels.' All your government needs to do is allege that a person is a 'tax resister' or a drug pusher and his property and real estate can be confiscated without due process. Some of you saw the story on INSIDE EDITION where a citizen's property was taken by the Federal authorities without due process merely because she had rented the house to people later determined to have been using the house for drug traffic. All your government needs to do is allege that property, real estate, cars, boats, etc., are owned by those involved in drugs, and this property can be taken and sold under Public Law 99-570 set in place in 1986. You have read the horror stories. Some minimum wage seaman can sneak drugs aboard a million dollar ship, unknown to the owners or the captain, and the ship is confiscated by the government without due process of law: HOW WILL YOU KNOW WHEN COMMUNISM TAKES OVER?

5. CENTRALIZATION OF CREDIT IN THE HANDS OF THE STATE, BY MEAN8 OF A NATIONAL BANK WITH STATE CAPITAL AND AN EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY.
It was through the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that the private banking cartel known as the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK came into being. It is through this scheme, with the government controlling the banks and credit for the benefit of the secret shareholders, that the effect of this objective of the communists came into being in the United States. The super rich bankers, while they liked the controls envisioned by Karl Marx, decided that all the usury and profits should go into THEIR pockets instead of the federal coffers. It is this small band of International Bankers who decide how much interest you are going to pay on your home mortgage and they have the monopoly power to force other banks to charge the same rates. Individual credit can be given or withheld at the whim of these bankers. The private FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM is neither 'federal' nor does it have any 'reserves' as commonly thought. The local Federal Reserve Bank is not listed under agencies of the Federal Government in your phone book, but listed in the white pages as any other private business.
The FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES, which you carry in your pocket, though printed by the federal government for those private banker's use, and identified as 'legal tender', are in fact privately circulated bank notes. As 'notes' they do not certify that the U.S. Treasury has gold or silver to 'back them' but state on their face that the U.S. Government is in debt to that amount. You are not paying your bills with certificates of wealth, but with evidences of federal debt. You are passing the U.S. debt to the bankers around among yourselves as if it was lawful money. The private Federal Reserve makes huge profits for its member banks, and yet it pays no federal or state income taxes, and they have never been audited by any government agency. A couple of years ago, Senator Metcalf of Washington State launched a campaign against the FEDERAL RESERVE and had it put on the ballot to restore the right to create money to the Congress as specified in the Constitution. The people in Washington State were so ignorant or communist-minded that they actually voted it down. [HOW WILL YOU KNOW...?]

In 1933, when so many banks lost their shirts and had to repay their depositors or close their doors, the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT was changed to incorporate the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (Hatonn: Note 'Corporation' which designates private.) Here is how that works, and we can see it with the current Savings and Loan scandals. In good times, the bankers make huge profits. However, in bad times, the American taxpayers are called upon to bail out the bankers, letting them retain their personal assets. How will you know when 'communism takes over'? Most people are so accustomed to the yoke of communism, thrust upon them in the name of 'democracy' and 'social security', that they believe that these things must be the form of government our Forefathers gave us. They think it is normal to have total taxes in amounts to 50% of income. Where is their Great Republic based upon the Common Law and the Constitution? For all practical purposes, it no longer exists.

6. CENTRALIZATION OF THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION AND TRANSPORTATION IN THE HANDS OF THE STATE.
All radio and television networks are licensed and permitted to operate only at the good pleasure of the federal government through the Federal Communications Commission. Because their programming is under strict federal guidelines, anti-Communist programs are rarely aired. How many of you can recall one TV program, in the past 30 years, which set forth the communist objectives for the conquest of America and the world? Instead, all programming is designed to promote socialist thinking, and our country is never referred to as a republic but ALWAYS AS A DEMOCRACY. All news is designed to promote the communists and their leading individuals as reasonable people, and anti-Communist nations, such as South Africa, are always cast in an unfavorable light. Communist objectives for America, such as degeneration of moral values, interracial marriage, promiscuous sex, and homosexual life-styles, are treated in both the news and the 'situation comedies" as totally normal and healthy behavior, and are given to us and our children on a daily basis.
All transportation by air is under either the Federal Aviation Agency or the Civil Aeronautics Administration, and the government controls how these private businesses operate and the fares and rates that they can charge. The federal government controls every form of interstate commerce, and sets the rates that these private businesses can charge and even how long a truck driver can drive his own truck in a given day.

7. EXTENSION OF FACTORIES AND INSTRUMENTS OF PRODUCTION OWNED BY THE STATE; THE BRINGING INTO CULTIVATION OF WASTE LANDS, THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE SOIL ACCORDING TO A COMMON PLAN.
The federal government now owns and operates more than 25,000 corporate units in direct competition with private enterprise. Most of these corporations are operated at staggering losses, even though they pay no property taxes and no interest on invested capital. All of these, along with their losses, are being operated without the slightest shred of Constitutional authority. Furthermore, according to figures taken from the Federal Budget, the aggregate losses of these federally owned businesses and property, including the lost state and local taxes thereon, exceed the total amount collected each year on the personal income taxes! According to the LIBERTY AMENDMENT COMMITTEE, from whom these statistics were taken, the sale of these unlawfully owned businesses would retire about one third of the national debt, and make the personal individual income taxes a thing of the past. This author is 100% in favor of bringing wastelands into cultivation and improving the soil. However, this must be done on a private enterprise basis, and not as the result of federal bureaucratic intervention. However, in accordance to the Marxist orientation of our government, swarms of New Officers (to use the language of the Declaration of Independence) have been descending upon our farmers. There is the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, Environmental Protection Agency, and many others. I do not need to comment on the crisis now being faced by America's independent farmers. It is not the result of incompetent farmers but because of federal meddling in both their agricultural and financial affairs.

8. EQUAL LIABILITY OF ALL TO LABOR, ESTABLISHMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ARMIES, ESPECIALLY IN AGRICULTURE.
In the first sentence, the emphasis should be on the word liability. This is to be a "worker's paradise" and therefore all have an equality liability, a pecuniary obligation, to labor. Every citizen, according to Marx, is required to labor, and every person is to be assigned a job. There is to be no non-laboring middle class working as salesmen and shopkeepers. In spite of massive government boondoggles in agriculture, the American farmer has found a way to produce food that feeds not only our country, but those countries as the USSR and China which still suppose that the Marxist way for agriculture may someday work. Once the farmers finally fall in large numbers, not because of agricultural flaws so much as corporate debt, the Marxist agriculture armies, gathered from those 'huddled masses yearning to be free', that now clog up the welfare rolls, will be sent forth to plant, till and harvest in the vain hope that they can feed the people.

9. COMBINATION OF AGRICULTURE WITH MANUFACTURING; GRADUAL ABOLITION OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TOWN AND COUNTRY BY A MORE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION OVER THE COUNTRY.
The destruction of the cities has been going on since the Roosevelt Depression. Socialist confiscatory property and business taxes on producers, and welfare handouts to non-producers, have driven commerce and industry out of the cities and provides the excuse for federal control of land use, environmental impact studies, and regional planning. Federal regional planning done between states and over state lines, is the way this Marxist plank is being carried out today.

10. FREE EDUCATION OF ALL CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ABOLITION OF CHILDREN'S FACTORY LABOR IN ITS PRESENT FORM. COMBINATION OF EDUCATION WITH INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION.
When Karl Marx wrote 'free' he meant compulsory education of the children under the control of the State. Because of the contract with the State known as the 'Marriage Licence', your children are legally Wards of the State. They must have 'shots' and a Social Security number 'required to protect the State's wards'. State run and tax financed government schools began soon after the publishing of the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO, with the key leader at that time being Horace Mann. Next came socialized or often called 'progressive' education under the guidance of John Dewey. How many of you remember having to read about the wonders of socialism in books by Lincoln Stephens in high school? The most socialist class in any high school is not history or social science but English, where the teacher can direct the children to read certain books and make reports on them. English is the only required class for all students, and it is there that the communists have directed their most attention. Under Biblical law, early American instruction, where students were studying Greek and Latin by 9 years of age, has always been the responsibility of the parents and their church assembly. Children were taught the moral values of the parents and of their church. Today, it is the State that determines what the standards will be for the children's education. Federal Aid to Education determines how the States will set up the basic teachings and philosophy and this is exactly what Marx had in mind. This form of education teaches the child to look to the State for help, and the State becomes the child's 'god'. Christian instruction, in contrast, teaches the child to look to God, and that if he needs a hand he finds one at the end of his arm. As you look at our youth educated in government schools, observe their appearance and their attitudes, and remember that crime and drug use is increasing 7X as fast as the population, you will see the evil genius of Karl Marx in full bloom. As you re-read this section, notice that I have drawn a clear distinction between 'instruction' and 'education'. It is humanistic, New Age, and Eastern philosophy that man is intrinsically good. Hence the use of the word 'education" by the modern socialist, which means from the Latin, 'draw the good out": In contrast, the Bible teaches that all men are sinners, and that they are basically of a sinful, wicked nature. Thus, there is no way to 'draw good out' of them. Christian philosophy, based upon the truth of the Bible, teaches that children are to be instructed, that is to have the good of God's Laws put into them so that they can be pleasing in God's sight. Today, those church groups that teach that God's Laws are still in full force and effect, always refer to their schools as Christian Instruction. Those churches who have gone the way of humanism, teaching that God's Laws, Statutes and Judgments were abandoned at The Cross, rightly call their schools 'Christian Education'. The term 'Christian Education' is an oxymoron, an absurd contradiction in meaning to those of us with even a smattering of classical study.
As to the second part of Marx's 10th Plank, children under 16 are not permitted to work for wages. All private apprenticeships have been abolished for children seeking to learn a trade before the age of 16. Roosevelt's socialist friends had the Fair Labor Standards Act passed in 1937 where apprenticeships are now under control of the State.
I have taken six pages to teach you what communism really is from the works of their founders, Karl Marx. Now, fellow American, how many of the Marxist Ten Planks have you accepted as normal, necessary, and indeed the American Way?

(Hatonn: Please pay close attention to that which I will now quote from the same document but bearing more attention. After that I shall outline the Executive Orders now signed and in place in your government.)
J. Edgar Hoover, in his classic book on the communist threat to America, MASTERS OF DECEIT, wrote that his greatest fear was that Americans would become 'state of mind communists' while adamantly denying any interest or adherence to communism. My friends, that is exactly what has happened. Most Americans go along with every single plank of the Communist Manifesto and even suppose that it is the American Way!

Now, my friends, the more powerful levers and more subtle webs have been set in place.
Several months ago I wrote about the Marxist income tax and the reasons why I was opposed to it. I further stated in public print that I had not filed any returns for 20 years nor paid any tax in all that time. These ON TARGET Northpoint Team Reports are widely photocopied and circulated with my permission and encouragement. However, they go from friend to friend and then to the Christian ignorant among the silent majority, and ultimately to the socialist enemy. You cannot believe the letters we get from professing Christians! I have read their letter admonishing me to read Romans 13, supposing that I had not managed to read that far into the New Testament. They call my attention to Christ's words to 'render unto Caesar...' and think that whatever is demanded by government under a pretext of law must be dutifully turned over to socialist schemes, heathen peoples around the world and social dropouts around the country as part of our Christian witness, testimony, and responsibility.
According to these Christians, educated into the communist Thought-theology psychopolitics of the government schools, apparently the American Colonists should have paid the tax on tea demanded of King George instead of 'damaging their Christian testimony in an act of violence' by dumping it all into Boston harbor. The tax was, after all, 'the Law' and imposed lawfully by those in authority. Worse than that, when the King wanted to confiscate 'assault rifles' being stored in Concord, 'Christian patriots should have turned them over to the Red Coats instead of killing people at Concord Bridge'.
Those early Americans are identified as Patriots, but those of us who object to the very same things today are thought of as un-American at best and unchristian at worst. Do you see the problem we have today? Christians are now 'state of mind Communists' as feared and predicted years and years ago. How do I reason with a 'state of mind' communist, who supposes that his political, moral and economic understanding comes right out of the Bible?
The Federal Income Tax Statutes, and the Supreme Court decisions supporting them, clearly state that wages and salaries are not 'income'. Yet Christian communists in America, in what profess to be patriotic assemblies, have been conned into waiving that statutory provision and to 'voluntarily' agreeing to pay the first part of their increase not to God's Law but to Caesar, in direct violation of God's Law set forth in Scripture. And they wonder why God stopped blessing America right after the Marxist Income Tax Statutes went into effect! Looking deeper still, we find that even the Marxist Income Tax Statutes made Constitutional by the 16th Amendment, applies only to those non-white citizens by privilege of our 14th Amendment. It also includes corporate officers, folks who live in Washington, D.C. and other Federal enclaves, military people and those who work in government jobs. But, people who exchange their time for wages, salaries, commissions, etc., are not required to file returns or pay federal taxes. Oh, your minister never told you these things? And your dad never knew them? Why are you giving the first portion of the wonderful blessings God gives you through increase of your land and labor of your hands and mind, to promote communism, totalitarian socialism and other wicked things at home and abroad? Shame on you! Repent of your ways.

I will tell you why you pay without a whimper! It is because you are scared to death of the wicked agents of the Internal Revenue and their well-publicized cruel activities and brutal enforcement procedures. Most of you lack the guts for such basic Christian service to your country, if the truth was really known. Some of my best friends and most generous supporters have confessed this fear to me privately and I have wept for their souls. You must understand, Scripture teaches that the fearful, right along with the unbelievers, murderers, whoremongers, sorcerers, idolaters and liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone. Read Revelation 21:8 about those listed among the non-overcomers! Those who are afraid, are just as wicked in God's Eyes, as some of the most terrible of anti-Christ people! Take your Strong's Concordance and do a word study on all the variations of the word fear and it will open your eyes of understanding. Oh, how I pray that some of my wonderful Team Members and other financial supporters will turn from their fearful ways and not be included among that wretched lot at the end of time.
Did you know that if you file income tax returns, you place your legal status under Admiralty Law, and waive your Common Law rights under the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution? The fearful, under an ironic twist to God's Law, find themselves unprotected by the 1st Amendment and cannot lawfully claim the right to religious freedom or the right of free speech, etc. They cannot claim the right to keep and bear arms as set forth in the 2nd Amendment. Since so few Americans remain who have these rights, the laws on the gradual confiscation of any 'semi-automatic weapon' are now being enacted, beginning with the so-called assault rifles, and hand guns that have an ammunition magazine or 'clip'. Are you surprised? These laws have been on the books for 20 years awaiting this day and hour I know that some do not believe me on this, but see for yourself. Go to your local library and ask the librarian to show you where the UNITED STATES CODE books are shelved. There are 25 of these in the set, reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the United States Government. Select Volume 9 and turn to page 554. Read public law 87-297 signed into law by John F. Kennedy in 1961. Every President since then has worked to gradually enact its provisions, knowing that most Americans would not approve. Read along through that public law to page 559, and you will see that it calls for our Armed Forces to be eliminated from NATIONAL CONTROL, which in turn wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In the third state we shall see a 'zero military' and before stage one closes, all citizen-owned guns will be banned. This issue of national disarmament is now being discussed with world leaders, and the ban on certain defensive weapons here at home is not new at all, but part of a treasonous scheme to render America as a nation, and our citizens as individuals, helpless against the Socialist-Communist conquest of the world.
Here is another problem: Are you sitting under a minister who is a state of mind communist, one of the fearful who still files income tax returns? Sure, he may be a nice guy. Sure, he may seem to be a kindly, loving man. But he is one of the fearful, classified by Godly John and Jesus Christ as being among the whoremongers and liars? Are you sending God's tithe and your offerings to any 'religious group' that is claiming 'tax exemption' and thus under the jurisdiction of our communist democracy of the District of Columbia? If you read our materials long enough, you will see a thread of theme about the ministers and preaching in America that is causing most of our problems. I remember back in the Old Testament, God's nation of Israel had some major problems under King Jeroboam. You might need to see how God dealt with His People in those days, as sort of a forecast of what is soon to pass in America. (I Kings 12, etc.} The bottom line then was that Jeroboam "made priests of the lowest of the people" (v.31). Christ, through St. John in Revelation 21:8, says that the lowest of people are the 'fearful'. You cannot be Godly and fearful at the same time, and the Bible world study suggested previously should have established that fact firmly in your mind. Therefore, all fearful are also ungodly, if you can follow that logic. The very first Psalm, a fantastic collection of distilled wisdom, begins with this most important truth: "Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly - fearful ... " How many of my wonderful friends and readers are still taking counsel of the fearful, men whom the Bible calls priests of the lowest of people, who it so often also appears, are state of mind communists?

END OF QUOTING - and so be it.
Now, Dharma, allow us to again present the executive orders which have now been brought into play - obviating even the need of Congressional agreement in order to become law against you the people.
Before we do so, however I am going to ask you a few questions and let us see if you REALLY see and understand that which I give you and that which IS!

<ol>
1 What is the name of the new Soviet Foreign Minister? 
2. What is the first plank in the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO? 
3. Whose picture is on the $20 Federal Bank 'note'? 
4. What is an SS 127. Who developed it? Where is it now? 
5. What did you have for breakfast on Saturday last? 
6. If you attend church, give me the doctrines according to denomination! Where did your minister get his "education" and did he get a "Christian Education" or "Christian Instructions"? 
7. What do you REALLY know about this 'Christian Community' within your own town? Funny thing about the one in Tehachapi, California - they offer to drive these Satanic speakers from out of the city - or worse; death!</ol>

<center>WHAT DO YOU REALLY KNOW ABOUT ANYTHING? </center>

Tell me the top 10 stats from Sunday's Superbowl! Welcome Home America! God have mercy on your children in the Middle East!

U.S. EXECUTIVE ORDERS NOW IN EFFECT (CHECK THEM ONE BY ONE AGAINST THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO)
1. EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 takes over all communications media. 
2. EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 takes over all electric power, petroleum, gas, fuel and minerals. 
3. EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 takes over all food resources and farms. 
4. EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 takes over all means of transportation, controls highways and seaports. 
5. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 drafts all citizens into work forces under the governmental supervision. 
6. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 takes over all health, welfare and educational functions. 

7. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 empowers the Postmaster General to register all citizens nationwide. 
8. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 takes over all airports and aircraft. 
9. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 takes over housing and finance authorities and housing designated as 'unsafe'. Establishes new locations for populations, relocates communities, builds new housing with public funds. 
10. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 takes over all railroads, inland waterways, and public storage facilities. 
11. EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 designates responsibilities of the Office of Emergency Planning giving authorization to put the above orders into effect in times of increased international tension or economic or financial crisis. 
Then comes the big one: Under EXECUTIVE ORDER 11490 all of above orders are immediately activated.
John F. Kennedy, at Columbia University in 1963, said it perfectly: "The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their plight". Ten days later, John F. Kennedy was assassinated! THINK ABOUT IT, AMERICA!!

Let us leave this segment, please. It is beyond time that I and/or my brothers who come forth as Hosts in preparation of the wondrous return of God, do any proving whatsoever; I do, however, suggest that you ones of Earth start a little "change and proof" routine pretty quickly. You had best look at that which abounds about you and perhaps your own perspective may not be so absolute against God's scribes. Salu
Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn, Cmdr, 
United Federation Fleet, 
Inter-Galactic Federation Command 
WHO MIGHT YOU BE?

The Info Underground

A synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics

Anonymous

Anonymous

Anonymous