Ask.com "why did Hitler hate the Jews so much?"

[Roy Hobs]

Was searching around the internet and found a list of "often asked questions".  Guess it was an Ad for ask.com.

I saw the question, "why did Hitler hate the Jews so much" and had to click.

Here is the answer -- One theory as to why Adolf Hitler hated the Jews so much goes back to his youth. As a young artist, he was rejected by the Jewish-dominated Vienna Art Academy. Others speculate that it was a combination of an attitude towards Jews in line with popular beliefs and some form of mental disorder.

Wow.

the scary thing here is people bought it and or are buying it.  

Never a day goes by where I don't shake my head in disbelief.  

Does anyone here ever lie in bed at night and wonder if you really are crazy?  I do.


My family and friends are convinced I have a mental disorder.

"The truth is not a defense".  

[pas]

Roy Hobs wrote:

Does anyone here ever lie in bed at night and wonder if you really are crazy? I do.

Yeah, I often did but I have now come to the realisation that it's really everybody else who's really crazy.

My family and friends are convinced I have a mental disorder.

Sad to hear but it's not you who has a mental disorder, it's them.the facts and rationality are on your side for sure.

[Roy Hobs]

Thanks Pas for sharing your heart ache.  It helps to know there are others.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I get all kinds of grief when I bring this up among some friends and family. This stubborn refusal to look at the truth is the natural outcome of people getting all of their information and morals from the same common source: television.  

To call television "Jewish Television" is to be redundant. All of the TV channels are controlled by Jews, and anything that conflicts with their world view is not going to stay on the TV for very long.  The people watch TV programming everyday, sometimes for hours, and they are programmed.

At the core of TV programming is the victimization of the Jews, specifically the holohoax. Hitler is made into the embodiment of evil; Hitler is the universal metaphor for wickedness. Godwin's Law [ "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1"] is the proof that society has been well programmed to hate Hitler and his "cruel treatment of the Jews".  

Those of us who are enlightened to the objective reality that transpires outside of TV land are faced with the prospect of communicating what we see to those watching the Jewish hand-puppet shadow performance on the wall.  They cannot accept the truth because they have formed an emotional attachment to the BIG LIE. It is kind of ironic that Hitler is so often misquoted as promoting the BIG LIE, but really he was calling everyone's attention to it. Describing them as the "Masters of the Lie" ["große Meiser im Lügen"], Hitler rightly cited Schopenhauer with the insight that the Jewish people throughout history have been known for being liars.

...the Jews have been detested and despised at all times and by all nations: the reason for this may lie in the fact that they were the only people on earth who believed in no future life apart from this earthly life, i.e., human beings were regarded as animals. The Jews are the scum of the earth, but they are also great masters in lying [Auswurf der Menschheit, aber große Meister im Lügen].
-- Schopenhauer

As a Christian, I find it disheartening to hear "zionist Christians" take the side of israhell, and to mouth off about the "chosen people" in reference to the Jews. All of this talk of zionism and Jewish chosenness is contrary to Catholic scripture and teaching, is is truly a great apostasy.  Of course these people talk this way and feel this way because they are programmed like everyone else.

This morning I just heard a Catholic leader talking about the 'righteous judgments' handed down at Nuremberg, and claiming that the Nuremberg court's authority was based in the Natural Law. If only that man knew of the true Jewish criminality perpetrated at Nuremberg, he would have held his tongue.  Nuremberg used ex post facto laws, the prosecution manufactured evidence, there was no right to confront witnesses, and the German leaders, whose greatest crime was to lose WWII to the Jews, were executed by hanging. It is no wonder that then Chief Justice Harlan Stone referred to Nuremberg as a "high-grade lynching party."  

How typical of the Big Lie that Jews promote the "Judgment at Nuremberg" as being the pinnacle of justice when it was actually a Jewish/Soviet show trial.  

Despite all this, I take heart in the fact in the fact that Jesus predicted that Jesus knew of this apostasy long ago.  The Book of Revelation named the Jews as the "synagogue of Satan" [Rev 2:9, 3:9] and foretold that in the final days the city of Jerusalem would be controlled by sodomites and demon worshipers [Rev 11:8]. Another hopeful aspect is that if we preach the Truth and we suffer for it, then that is truly a blessing.

Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Even those that do not believe Scripture and are not saved [or do not yet know it] will admit that, given the choice, they would rather know the truth and suffer than persist in believing a lie.  Why? Because the Truth is sweet, like honey. And there is strength and power in the Truth.  The Truth makes us strong.  And the Truth makes us free:

And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

[Anonymous]

Even those that do not believe Scripture and are not saved [or do not yet know it] will admit that, given the choice, they would rather know the truth and suffer than persist in believing a lie. Why? Because the Truth is sweet, like honey.

Did you blink at all when you wrote that? you are presupposing christianity is real when it is the biggest scam and hoax in history, 100 times greater than the holohoax and much more insidious.

[Christopher Marlowe]

Your opinion is your own and it is empty.

Who started the great universities of Europe? What religion is responsible for the growth of Europe itself? Who preserved history after the fall of the Roman Empire? Who started the movement to end slavery? The Catholic Church.

What have atheists every accomplished as a group? Nothing. Why would someone act so proud with so little to show for their efforts? Perhaps they don't know what they are talking about, and they get all of their opinions from Jewish media.

[GordZilla]

Again with this ongoing 'debate'.

 One thing that  is so often and so easily over looked is the FACT that Christianity has always been the biggest thorn in the Jew's side. Throughout history the best of the 'anti-Semites' have been Christian. The biggest resistance to the Jew, again throughout history, has been by Christian hands. The biggest reason the Church was dismantled and reformed under 'Vatican 2' was out of shear NECESSITY by the Jews. Blue Jelly you over look this point constantly. I understand that today's church is hand in hand with the Jew, but this is a relatively new development and again was one that had to be done for the Jew to proceed in his operation. If not for the historical church this process of Jewish world domination would have long since been over. You cannot simply dismiss that even though your current, and apparently media fed, bias urges you to.


 When you see the church today you are not seeing the same people as those that call themselves Christian on this 'Jew-wise' forum. You really should keep that in mind.
And yes ...what has atheism ever done to stop or even slow the Jew's progress? They support atheism as much, or even more, than they support today's modern 'Judaeochristian' church. Probably more, as they also support 'Christian bashing' in every form possible.  From main stream media to popular social websites, wherever they can. Which, by the way, is an utterly useless endeavor given that if they would have just wrote the story of Jesus in their favor in the first place it could have all been avoided. How illogical, unless -perhaps- they didn't create this religion and perhaps, just perhaps, Jesus did.


Sorry Blue but there's no truth in what you believe, history does not reflect it and the Jew's are simply not stupid enough to create, for themselves, their greatest opposition that they have ever known, or will likely ever know.


'Jew's created Jesus' is utter BS, it's been debunked a hundred times over. Your average Christian, regardless of how brain dead they may be now-a-days, is not your enemy. The average 'Jew-wise' Christian is very in tune with the average Christian of years gone by and they are your greatest asset in this fight - also, historically speaking,  they are the most successful.


You don't have to believe but try to at least have respect for those 'Jew-wise' that do, they still may yet come in handy.

[Roy Hobs]

When you see the church today you are not seeing the same people as those that call themselves Christian on this 'Jew-wise' forum. You really should keep that in mind.

Keep in mind also that the New Testatment actually PREDICTS what we are seeing today in the so called "Church".  The Christ and His Disciples all wrote that TRUE CHRISTIANITY would be all but extinct as time progresses. They predicted the 'falling away' even in the first Century.  


If people like blue jelly bothered to read the New Testatment, he would realize that the public face of Christianity today is not Biblicaly Christianity at all.  True Biblical Christians hardly exist these days.  True Christians don't even go to brick and mortar churches.  

 The public face of Christianity is not true Biblical Christiantiy.  The New Testament testifies to this reality.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I think Gordzilla is spot on. But while I agree with Roy in part, I think he bites off a little too much to say that " True Christians don't even go to brick and mortar churches."  I can only speak for myself, but I love Jesus and I still go to Mass.  

Jesus didn't say that there wouldn't be a Church when he returned, but he told a parable that might be seen to reflect the current persecution of the Church by the Jews, and the Christians' inability to even recognize their enemy, let alone ask God for help against them:

Lk 18:1-8 AND he spoke also a parable to them, that we ought always to pray, and not to faint, 2 Saying: There was a judge in a certain city, who feared not God, nor regarded man. 3 And there was a certain widow in that city, and she came to him, saying: Avenge me of my adversary. 4 And he would not for a long time. But afterwards he said within himself: Although I fear not God, nor regard man, 5 Yet because this widow is troublesome to me, I will avenge her, lest continually coming she weary me. 6 And the Lord said: Hear what the unjust judge saith. 7 And will not God revenge his elect who cry to him day and night: and will he have patience in their regard? 8 I say to you, that he will quickly revenge them. But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?

Jesus is telling us that Christians need to wake up and recognize who their adversary is. Then WE need to pray to God for help against the Jews. This is the same thing that Br Kapner says.

There are many people who call themselves "Christian" but they are zionists who give their undying support to israel. And as for the Catholics, I think this is due, largely, to Vatican II.  There was another thread posted a year ago talking about Benedict's statements denying the Jews' part in killing Christ.  This is a contradiction of what is in the Bible, and it also contradicts what the Church ALWAYS TAUGHT.  After all, the Catholic Church edited and compiled the books that we know today as the Bible. There are certainly Protestant versions, but they are working off the books chosen by the Church.  

The zionist influence in Protestantism has been going back much farther, and there has been a lot of ink spilled on documenting various Protestant factions and their Jewish roots. (e.g. John Calvin nee John Cohen)

   

Calvin was also a Jew and an agent of the Prieuré de Sion.

"Contrary to general belief, Calvinism is of Jewish origin. It was deliberately conceived to split the adherents of the Christian religions and divide the people. Calvin's real name was Cohen! When he went from Geneva to France to start preaching his doctrine he became known as Cauin. Then in England it became Calvin. History proves that there is hardly a revolutionary plot that wasn't hatched in Switzerland; there is hardly a Jewish revolutionary leader who hasn't changed his name.

"At B'nai B'rith celebrations held in Paris, France, in 1936 Cohen, Cauvin, or Calvin, whatever his name may have been, was enthusiastically acclaimed to have been of Jewish descent (The Catholic Gazette, February, 1936).http://300sploggers.blogspot.com/2010/1 ... alvin.html
http://www.henrymakow.com/jewish_peril.html

And by now we all should know about the Scofield Bible that promoted zionism...

The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling "bible" in America and has remained so for 90 years.
 
The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World Zionism.

From: The Zionist-Created
Scofield 'Bible'
The Source Of The Problem In The Mideast - Part 2
Why Judeo-Christians Support War
By C. E. Carlson
http://rense.com/general60/zcre.htm

But despite this Jewish attempt to overturn Jesus' Church, there have been many Christians who have spotted the enemy and have pushed back. Catholic Writer E Michael Jones has written many articles and books that discuss the problem of Jewish subversion, most notably "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" and "Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control". (CSR posted a review on TIU here: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=16505)

Another Catholic writer, Michael Hoffman, wrote a book that gives a detailed examination of the Talmud, "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit".  Just looking at his website I found another book called, "Judaism's Strange Gods": "Here is the best book on Judaism for educating people about the hidden side of this much glorified,  but soul-destroying religion of warfare and deception." http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot ... onist.html

If you want to know the historical view that that Catholic Church preached about Jews, go read some of the sermons by St John Crysostom.  I posted one at TIU on the Giuliani page a while back. They can be found here: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/c ... -jews6.asp
St John Crysostom's words are as true today as they were then. [chrysostomos, meaning "golden mouthed"] It's funny that when you read people's descriptions of St John Crysostom online today, they are 'troubled by his anti-semitism'.  

Does that sound familiar? Like the same people who wonder why Hitler hated the Jews so much. They scratch their heads, and they just can't figure it out. This is because the Jewish TV/Computer they have been plugged into all their lives has programmed them not to think anything bad about Jews. If people think a negative thought about Jews, their programming will punish them. If they continue, and break free of their programming, the Jewish society will punish them. That is why people who question the Jews have to be shut up and/or made an example of. e.g. that substitute teacher (maybe the lowest rung on the ladder of the civil service) who was fired from her job by her JEWISH boss the first Monday after her rant against the Federal Reserve was broadcast on TV.

The most notorious of all perhaps, was Fr Coughlin, whose radio shows condemning Jewish communism could be heard nationwide.  Fr Coughlin was waking people up to the Jewish subversion, and that is why Roosevelt had to shut him down:

In 1935 Coughlin started a campaign to restructure the Federal Reserve System and urged Roosevelt to take full government control over the nation's banking system and to establish a Central Bank. ... Coughlin also joined Huey Long in the campaign to persuade President Franklin D. Roosevelt to support the paying of the Bonus Bill, a large sum of money owed to the American veterans of the First World War.

Coughlin gradually grew disillusioned with Roosevelt and on 11th November, 1934, he announced the formation of the National Union of Social Justice. At this time some observers claimed that Father Coughlin was the second most important political figure in the United States. It was estimated that Coughlin's radio broadcasts were getting an audience of 30 million people. He was also having to employ twenty-six secretaries to deal with the 400,000 letters a week he was receiving from his listeners.

According to Wallace Stegner "Father Coughlin had a voice of such mellow richness, such manly, heart-warming, confidential intimacy, such emotional and ingratiating charm, that anyone tuning past it on the radio dial almost automatically returned to hear it again." As well as his radio broadcasts, Coughlin also began publishing Social Justice Weekly, a journal which soon achieved a circulation of over one million copies.

In May 1935 Coughlin began having talks with Huey Long, Francis Townsend, Gerald L. K. Smith, Milo Reno and Floyd B. Olson about a joint campaign to take on President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1936 presidential elections. Long was expected to the candidate but he was assassinated on 8th September, 1935.

After the death of Long, Joseph Kennedy attempted to reconcile Father Coughlin and Roosevelt. The conference in September 1935 was a failure and the following year Coughlin joined with Francis Townsend, Gerald L. K. Smith and followers of the late Huey Long to take on Roosevelt in the 1936 presidential election. The National Union of Social Justice selected William Lepke from North Dakota, as the party's candidate, but he won only 882,479 votes compared to Franklin D. Roosevelt (27,751,597) and Alfred Landon (16,679,583).

After this defeat Coughlin's replaced the National Union of Social Justice with the Christian Front and concentrated on the dangers of communism. Coughlin also became an isolationist and one of his campaign slogans was: "Less care for internationalism and more concern for national prosperity."

In the late 1930s Coughlin moved sharply to the right and accused Franklin D. Roosevelt of "leaning toward international socialism or sovietism". He also praised the actions of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini in the fight against communism in Europe. On 20th November 1938, Coughlin defended the activities of the Nazi Government as a necessary defence against the Soviet Union.

Arthur Miller wrote: "Father Charles E. Coughlin, who by 1940 was confiding to his ten million Depression-battered listeners that the president was a liar controlled by both the Jewish bankers and, astonishingly enough, the Jewish Communists, the same tribe that twenty years earlier had engineered the Russian Revolution... He was arguing... that Hitlerism was the German nation's innocently defensive response to the threat of Communism, that Hitler was only against 'bad Jews', especially those born outside Germany."

Like Joseph Goebbels, Coughlin claimed that Marxist atheism in Europe was a Jewish plot. Coughlin also attacked the influence of Jews in America and this resulted in him being described as a fascist. In April 1941, Coughlin endorsed the America First Committee. However, his now open Anti-Semitism made this endorsement a mixed blessing for the organization.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAcoughlinE.htm

If Coughlin was alive today, he would probably be posting on TIU. I wonder what BJ would say to Fr Coughlin....

Roosevelt responded by creating the FCC to kick Coughlin off the air. The new approach to radio was that it did NOT enjoy the same freedom of the press that books and newspapers did, arguing instead that radio was a limited resource with limited broadcast spectrum, and therefor the government had a right to limit the access of this resource through licenses. When broadcasters submitted for licenses, guess who didn't get one? Coughlin.

Without a license, he couldn't give any more live broadcasts. Coughlin reacted by finding a legal loophole: he pre-recorded his show on records and paid to have it played on licensed stations, just as music records were. The FCC, responding to pressure from what was basically a one party government at the time, threatened to revoke licenses from any stations that played Coughlin's speeches. They all stopped. It was clear case of political censorship, but the other stations saw Coughlin as a competitor, as did the newspapers, so there were precious few willing to risk the President's wrath by supporting Coughlin's cause.

Coughlin resorted by creating his own newspaper, Social Justice, which he mailed to subscribers across the nation. He figured Roosevelt couldn't do anything about that since freedom of the press was the well established law of the land. But Roosevelt was so powerful at the time, that he was actually able to cut off Coughlin's mailing privileges, so the popular priest had no way to reach his audience unless he hired taxies and trucking companies to deliver his newspaper door to door.

Here's the Wikipedia version:

The administration decided that although the First Amendment protected free speech, it did not necessarily apply to broadcasting, because the radio spectrum was a "limited national resource" and regulated as a publicly owned commons. New regulations and restrictions were created to force Coughlin off the air. For the first time, operating permits were required of those who were regular radio broadcasters. When Coughlin's permit was denied, he was temporarily silenced. Coughlin worked around the restriction by purchasing air time and having his speeches played via transcription. However, having to buy the weekly air time on individual stations seriously reduced his reach and strained his resources.

Father Coughlin's opposition to the repeal of a neutrality-oriented arms-embargo law triggered more successful efforts to force him off the air.[42] In October 1939, one month after the invasion of Poland, Sheldon Marcus says that "the Code Committee of the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) adopted new rules which placed rigid limitations on the sale of radio time to 'spokesmen of controversial public issues'".[43] Manuscripts were required to be submitted in advance. Radio stations were threatened with the loss of their licenses if they failed to comply. This ruling was clearly aimed at Coughlin due to his opposition to prospective American involvement in World War II. As a result, in the September 23, 1940, issue of Social Justice Father Coughlin announced that he had been forced from the air "...by those who control circumstances beyond my reach".[44]

Coughlin reasoned that although the government had assumed the right to regulate any on-air broadcasts, the First Amendment still guaranteed and protected freedom of the written press. He could still print his editorials without censorship in his own newspaper, Social Justice. After the attack on Pearl Harbor and the declaration of war in December 1941, the anti-interventionist movement (such as the America First Committee) began to sputter out, and isolationists like Coughlin were seen as being sympathetic to the enemy. The Roosevelt Administration stepped in again. On April 14, 1942, U.S. Attorney General Francis Biddle [later a judge at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg] wrote a letter to the Postmaster General, Frank Walker, and suggested the possibility of revoking the second class mailing privilege of Social Justice, which would make it impossible for Coughlin to deliver the papers to his readers.[45] Walker scheduled a hearing for April 29, which was later postponed until May 4.[46] Meanwhile, Attorney General Biddle was also exploring the possibility of bringing an indictment against Coughlin for sedition.[47] Hoping to avoid a sedition trial, he met with Leo Crowley, who was a close friend of Archbishop Edward Mooney, Bishop Gallagher's successor. Crowley met with the archbishop and, according to Sheldon Marcus, told him "of the government's willingness to deal with Coughlin in a restrained manner if he would order Coughlin to cease his public activities".[48] Consequently, on May 1, Archbishop Mooney ordered Coughlin to stop his political activities and confine himself to his duties as a parish priest, warning that he would be defrocked if he refused. Coughlin complied and remained the pastor of the Shrine of the Little Flower until retiring in 1966.

Coughlin died in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan in 1979, at the age of 88.

Today Fr Coughlin is generally reviled as an "antisemite":

I dislike the term "anti-Semitic." It's imprecise, and in Coughlin's case, inadequate. Not all Semitic peoples practice Judaism, not all Jews are of Semitic descent, and Coughlin was not merely anti-Jew, he was a demented, evil, foaming-at-the-mouth rabid Jew-hater. He blamed the Depression on "the international conspiracy of Jewish bankers," blamed the Russian Revolution on Jewish intellectuals, claimed that Marxism in Europe was a Jewish plot, and repeatedly and highly praised Mussolini and Hitler. In 1932 he supported Roosevelt for President, saying, "The New Deal is Christ's Deal," but by 1934 he'd become a liability and was telling his audiences that Roosevelt was merely a tool of Wall Street, international soviet communism, and Jewish bankers.

You can listen to Fr Coughlin's broadcasts here: http://archive.org/details/Father_Coughlin and also at "He, the witness in France, whose site shall not be named".