Lyndon LaRouche- shill or not ?

michaelangelo · July 29, 2012, 06:23:16 PM

A freind sent this to me saying she thought La Rouche is a shill and asked what I thought. I'd never heard of him before but I think he could be a Rothchild agent. See waht you think. I welcome any comments.
http://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column ... n-larouche

michaelangelo · July 30, 2012, 09:31:44 AM

Does any have anyone thoughts or comments on Lyndon LaRouche ?>

mgt23 · July 30, 2012, 10:10:42 AM

Instead of asking TiU, what do you think? You scream infiltrator.....harvesting opinions for profiling.

michaelangelo · July 30, 2012, 11:38:49 AM

bollox

Wimpy · July 30, 2012, 12:08:10 PM

LaRouche can, at times, be a good source for a History Lesson. A few years ago, I give him credit for my limited knowledge of the "Venetians". Although he did not specifically name the Parasitical jews, it was clear that his lesson described their Monopoly of the Ship Building Business and general Commerce for the Mediterranean Sea during the late 1400's through the 1500's. The entire City of Venice was excommunicated by the Church and the Venetian Branch of the tribe (my words) then relocated to the Netherlands/Holland.

Other than that highlight, I've found LaRouche to be a Gatekeeper by routinely obsessing on the British Crown without one mention of the jew Tribe. Everything is BC; the BC infiltrated our Government, the BC's long term plans to control America again,.. the BC Money Capital,....again, Not Once the mention of the tribe.

Less than a year ago, while listening to one of his lectern and messianic rants (oh, how his young zombies grovel), he announced an Emergency Warning to all of his followers. Take arms, prepare NOW for Armageddon from the BC, false flag, monetary collapse...24 hours notice blah, blah. I thought, for a moment, that I may have been listening to Alex Jones.

So, I have learned a couple of Historical tid-bits from LL but he is, most definitely, a Gatekeeper AND a Shill.

michaelangelo · July 30, 2012, 01:35:19 PM

Thanks for your thoughts.
Yeah I suspected he may be a shill. I think he's into central banking. Could be working for the Rothchild's.

Christopher Marlowe · July 30, 2012, 03:40:01 PM

Yeah, what Wimpy said. I have learned a lot from reading LL stuff, and he was warning about the Federal Reserve and the Trilateral Commission way back in the 70's. There are reports from his camp talking about 9/11 very early on.

I don't know if talks about "the Crown" instead of "the Jews" because he is a shill, or if he is afraid they will throw him back into prison. I read his stuff with a grain of salt, keeping a wary eye out for the turd in the punchbowl.

Wimpy · July 30, 2012, 04:12:05 PM

Quote from: "Christopher Marlowe"Yeah, what Wimpy said. I have learned a lot from reading LL stuff, and he was warning about the Federal Reserve and the Trilateral Commission way back in the 70's. There are reports from his camp talking about 9/11 very early on.

I don't know if talks about "the Crown" instead of "the Jews" because he is a shill, or if he is afraid they will throw him back into prison. I read his stuff with a grain of salt, keeping a wary eye out for the turd in the punchbowl.

If LL is perhaps willfully substituting the British Crown for jews as a self preservation intent, I must then consider that his main followers and audience (young, well mannered & dressed conservative people) are probably too brainwashed and parrot-like to make that link themselves. I have no idea whether he winks or gives his close followers a telegraphed cue that he is 'really' referring to jews. Not once in my actual LL readings or listening to audio files have I heard direct accusations of jews. I, therefore, make my accusation of LL being a Gatekeeper/Shill, misleading those that hang on his every word.

Yes, CM, keep a wary eye out for the turd in the punchbowl.

Amanda · July 30, 2012, 07:19:04 PM

My thoughts are basically w/Wimpy's--I've learned a bit from them on history, but you have to do a whole lot of sifting to sort the good info from the bad. They are completely worthless on ww2 (they basically worship FDR!?!??!, which probably tells you all you need to know). Some of their info on pre-ww1 was pretty good, though you have to add more info to really get the full picture. And they definitely focus more on the royals than on the jewish bankers behind the scenes. But I've definitely heard them talk about the Rothschilds and Soros, so they don't ignore them, but they just don't talk about as much as they should. It's also kind of interesting that it seems like Larouche and his cult-like followers have changed their message over the course of time (I'm assuming that this is b/c they try to be a political movement and need people to join their ranks, plus there are lots of jews who are part of the organization...hmm..). They actually used to be good on calling out the zionist lobby (probably way before anyone else ever talked about them), but it seems like in recent years they really haven't focused on them as they should. If you do a search on "Larouche Anti-semite" you get some interesting info, like the stuff at this site: http://lyndonlarouche.org/examples.htm

Also interesting to note that his german wife calls the holohoax a "swindle."