Cultural Marxism News — Cisgenders

Started by Idaho Kid, July 02, 2014, 09:35:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Idaho Kid

 "I prefer the term non-trans to other options such as cissexual/cisgendered...as I think it both centers trans as the norm, and presently offers more clarity to the average person than the cis prefix."

From Boldfacenews - http://www.boldfacenews.com/cultural-marxism-news-cisgenders/

This may actually be news only to me. Most of you may not be as ignorant about your gender/sexual identity as I have been until today.  Quick test:  If you are a man/woman belonging to the majority, i.e., not homosexual/lesbian or transgender, do you call yourself
– a heterosexual man or woman or simply
– a man or woman

If you answered 'yes' to either you are as naive and misinformed as I used to be.  Cultural Marxism shows the error of your ways.

First you must understand that there is no such thing as a 'norm.' Heterosexuality is not the norm because that would make homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders deviations from the norm.

In fact, the multiplicity of gender and sexual diversity requires that the men and women formerly known as heterosexuals be redefined against the standard of this diversity formerly known as deviations from the norm.  That is why the terms 'cisgender' and 'cissexual' were coined in the 90s to describe individuals whose gender assigned at birth is 'aligned' –matches — their gender and sexual identity.

It would have been awkward to call them non-trans' or 'non-homo,' although some prefer this alternative, as 'health advocate' Krista Scott-Dixon noted,

    "I prefer the term non-trans to other options such as cissexual/cisgendered...as I think it both centers trans as the norm, and presently offers more clarity to the average person than the cis prefix"

According to wikipedia, an unequalled resoirce for cultural marxism, Carl Buijs, a transsexual man from the Netherlands, claimed that he coined the word in 1995. Buijs said in a Usenet posting,

    "As for the origin, I just made it up. I just kept running into the problem of what to call non-trans people in various discussions, and one day it just hit me: non-trans equals cis. Therefore, cisgendered."

Also according to wikipedia, 'In February 2014, Facebook began offering "custom" gender options, allowing users to identify with one or more gender-related terms from a curated list, including cis, cisgender, and others.'

Embedded with my ignorance of my 'non-trans,' non-,' 'non-,...  gender identity there lurked my blindness to my cisgender privilege – a myriad of perks and unearned advantages I have enjoyed all my life, as I have just found out.

    'While having been used by trans activists for some time, the term "cisgender privilege" has recently appeared in academic literature and is defined there as the "set of unearned advantages that individuals who identify as the gender they were assigned at birth accrue solely due to having a cisgender identity." 'Heterosexual privilege' is also a new topic.

Oh, to be white, cisgendered and Christian — or rather non-Jewish — one cannot sink any lower...
"Certainly the Protocols are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity. The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever." - Ezra Pound

maz

Just ignore them or make fun of anyone making using these invented terms. They aren't even taking off because they don't even make any sense. Just a bunch of gobbledygook.

Idaho Kid

Maz, the agenda seems to be moving forward.  Trans bathrooms, trans bathroom rights, etc., etc.  Wondering if the public is asleep enough to swallow the whole thing.
"Certainly the Protocols are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity. The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever." - Ezra Pound

yankeedoodle


maz

Quote from: Idaho Kid on July 22, 2014, 01:21:24 PM
Maz, the agenda seems to be moving forward.  Trans bathrooms, trans bathroom rights, etc., etc.  Wondering if the public is asleep enough to swallow the whole thing.

Well, the trans-agenda might be moving forward somewhat, but no one supports these new weird people using the wrong bathrooms. It's just being forced on them by being snuck in through things like city ordinances.

I was specifically referring to the terminology "cis" "pansexual", it's not catching on. I have a friend who's daughter is gay and who is dating what is being called a "stud," and I had to explain what was going on with her daughter, what she was sexually and what not, but even the daughter is not using any of these terms like cisgender, and all that. The terminology has not penetrated the public like the world "selfie."