Fr. Kramer: Putin Requests Consecration Francis Denies

[Idaho Kid]

There's a good interview with Hugh Akins, Antichrist Rising: The Diabolical Disorientation at Full Throttle at http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2015/04/14/ecclesia-militans-radio-episode-1-antichrist-rising-the-diabolical-disorientation-at-full-throttle-interview-with-hugh-akins/

[Brooklyn Dave]

I watched a 3 hour video of Fr. Kramer last night concerning the present Pope and his legitimacy. All I could say is WOW. I have to start following this guy in order to get my up and up on the RC Church.

[Michael K.]

I want to say something about the website called ecclesia militins which is featured in the YouTube above.  A warning: you are looking at the propaganda of the Antichrist.  Now, Father Kramer is a different story and I don't address him personally, although he did speculate positively about Putin's role as the Great White Hype.  Nonetheless, do not construe this as an attack of Fr. Kramer, please.

Back to the website and video:

1). The double headed eagle is the symbol of the Antichrist, which I try to explain here:
http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=19525.0

2). Ultra- right reactionary Catholic heretical societies, like the Knights of Malta, are usually tied to all sorts of unwholesome activities, like death squads, assassinations, etc. These people are representing as "eagle knights", which is itself a common representation of evil, being nothing less than Roman legionnaires thinly veiled under Catholic cloth.

3). Ecclesia Militans Radio – Episode 1 – Antichrist Rising: The Diabolical Disorientation at Full Throttle (Interview with Hugh Akins).   That just says it all, so in their mind they have fully informed you of their intent to decieve. That's classic " Satanic reversal".


4). The website Ecclesia Militins woefully misquotes the Bible in another "Satanic reversal" of apparent meaning.  The words of the Lord are quoted in the video and there are images depicted in such a way, as to make it them seem to say, "where the (Eucharistic) body is, there the eagles (ultra-Catholic knights) will be gathered together."

HERE IS THE ACTUAL VERSE:

23At that time if anyone says to you, 'Look, here is the Messiah!' or, 'There he is!' do not believe it. 24For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25See, I have told you ahead of time.

26"So if anyone tells you, 'There he is, out in the wilderness,' do not go out; or, 'Here he is, in the inner rooms,' do not believe it. 27For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 28Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.

What this verse means is that false messiahs will arise and people will say of such a one, that He has arrived, but is hiding in seclusion in the desert or inner chambers.  But don't believe it because when Jesus Christ returns there will be unmistakable signs of light given in the sky, everyone will know and "all the tribes of the earth shall mourn".  "Where the carcass is,.." refers to the false Christs warned of in the previous lines.  A body appearing that people think is the Messiah is actually a spiritually dead carcass, surrounded by spiritual vultures (aetoli in Greek), meaning also the evil powers of the air.

[Idaho Kid]

Thanks for the input, Michael.  I listened to the Akins interview and found it informative.  Do you have problems with him?  Would like to hear your ideas.  Thanks.

[Michael K.]

Okay, I listened to the interview done by Ecclesia Militins of Hugh Atkins, who seems to identify as a  member of the Society of Pius X along with bishop Williamson, although they are both a bit outside the present Society's structure, so it would seem.  Anyway, he said what I would expect a close supporter of Williamson to say, most of which is staunch Catholic traditionalism.  Of course, one quickly runs into the problem that there is nothing quite so traditionally Catholic as blind, unthinking fascist loyalty to the Pope, as he discovers new, heretical "truth" unknown to the way of the Apostles.  And that is where this Akins fellow ran afoul of all that Catholic bullshit, and is obviously still very confused.

But he did launch into a Jeremiad against faggoty jewey masonic Zio-America, quite accurately I must say.  Of course he has no solutions to offer, because maybe there are none.  He seems to identify as Antichrist, however, all the Satanic mayhem around these days, which is quite true, but it is antichrist with a small "a" , and leaves little room for understanding the true nature of the Antichrist, which is a pseudo-Christian crypto-Jew, who rules the world alone with his pal the False Prophet.  That isn't what he was brought on for, it would be contrary to his use by said Antichrist, who was represented by the host.

By far the worst part of the program was listening to the Canadian host go through his script with such stiff and phoney delivery, and it was very obviously scripted like some kind of frigging infomercial.  Listen again, and you will notice that the host's lines are all Satanically reversible.  In all, we have no interview of any journalistic style or content.  There are softballs and set-ups, but no questions of any real difficulty.  In all, I would say that Hugh Akins got used to say condemnatory things about America, by its political and spiritual enemies.

[Idaho Kid]

Is there a problem with rejecting the SSPX?  Have they not sold out?

Not sure what the problem with the questions asked is?  My notion of "satanic reversal" would be the typically JSM omissions, lies, and hypocrisies. 

Akins is identifying Jewish power and attempting to rally a Catholic response.  Long over due. 

[Michael K.]

No, of course I disavow all ultra-Catholic rightism like SSPX.  They are staunchly monarchist and stuck in the middle ages, which they consider the good old days but which really just sucked for most people.  What Akins says is all (mostly) true, but he is just getting shilled by the Antichrist forces behind Ecclesia Militins.  The question can no longer be merely whether something is true, but it must become a question of what use the apparent truth is being put.  In this case, traditional Catholic reaction is being used as a vehicle to convey the "new middle ages" of the Antichrist forces.  Satanic reversal is where a statement appears to mean something good, but the same exact words mean something extremely bad, if you actually think about it.  Example: "[because we need to win the war] we are going to have to make sacrifices". - G.W. Bush Jr.  Does this refer to self-abnegation or ritual murder?