veteranstoday.com posting about KHALEZOV

[/tab]

.
.

Now is veteranstoday.com posting about KHALEZOV, both in an article and an audio interview, read and listen to it a little bit below



Of course clueless MikeWB was alread by then declaring me dumb:

Nukes took towers  down? You sure it wasn't the space lasers and energy beams?  :roll:

Thread will remain in Nonsense because it is nonsense. Debate it there all you want with whomever wants to debate it there.

PLEASE, quit posting idiotic bullshit to TiU.

PS: No amount of capitalization and use of size tags will make something that's false, true.

Here at TiU I was  writting about the issue by then:

viewtopic.php?f=56&t=10573


Some of the youtube videos are long time done, but here you can find those in severals other sites:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=ie7&q=KHALEZOV&rls=com.microsoft:sv:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rlz=1I7ACAW#q=KHALEZOV&rls=com.microsoft:sv:IE-SearchBox&oe=UTF-8&rlz=1I7ACAW&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=vid:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv&fp=2a2ec13c020306a9
________________________________________________________________________________________


[youtube:1khwnlz8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aGY5oWffas[/youtube]1khwnlz8]


NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE, AMERICANS HAVE DIED AND OUR GOVERNMENT HAS LIED


Dimitri Khalezov talks about nuclear terrorism, 9/11 and who is responsible for terror attacks that have killed thousands of Americans.
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

What if someone could prove that the terrorist bombs, Oklahoma City, Beirut Marine Barracks, the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the Bali attacks and more, many more weren't car and truck bombs at all, not the kind we were told, what then?  Buildings thrown into the air like toys, mushroom clouds rise a dozen miles, explosions larger than anything known previously, many times larger than the biggest bomb, even larger than exploding munition ships from World War 2.  These have happened over and over, been misreported in our news, nuclear attacks, new precision weapons that emulate conventional explosives.

Khalezov says that when we hear truck or car bombs, sometimes something else is going on, something sinister.  One case in particular stands out, the murder of over 200 US Marines in Lebanon in 1983.  Americans are told that a truck bomb blew up a four story building, heavily reinforced, killing everyone in and near it.  The explosion could be seen in Israel and felt in Cyprus.  We are told this was the largest non-nuclear explosion in history:

The suicide bomber detonated his explosives, which were equivalent to 12,000 pounds (about 5,400 kg) of TNT. The force of the explosion collapsed the four-story cinder-block building into rubble, crushing many inside.It is said  to have been the largest non-nuclear blast ever (deliberately) detonated on the face of the earth. "The force of the explosion," "initially lifted the entire four-story structure, shearing the bases of the concrete support columns, each measuring fifteen feet in circumference and reinforced by numerous one and three quarter inch steel rods. The airborne building then fell in upon itself. A massive shock wave and ball of flaming gas was hurled in all directions."

About 20 seconds later, an identical attack occurred against the barracks of the French 3rd Company of the 6th French Parachute Infantry Regiment. Another suicide bomber drove his truck down a ramp into the building's underground parking garage and detonated his bomb, leveling the headquarters.


The claim is that the explosives in the truck were equal to 6 tons of TNT and made the largest explosion known to man, even larger than the blast made when, in 1944, the munitions



This explosion could have been nothing but a nuke.  Figure a ton of TNT is roughly the size of a Russian car.  Did someone miss 100 cars?  300 cars?  A small train, no tracks mind you, just a train driving down the road?


GROUND ZERO, KHOBAR TOWERS


KHOBAR TOWERS

In 1996, a United States Air Force housing complex was destroyed by a "truck bomb" in an attack almost identical to Oklahoma City.  20 were killed, 19 Americans and 372 were injured.  The explosion was, as with Beirut, the "largest conventional explosion known to man."

Not all large truck bombs have used ANFO. On June 25, 1996, Saudi terrorists sponsored by Iran attacked the Khobar Towers barracks, a high-rise building complex in a densely populated urban environment in Saudi Arabia. T tanker truck loaded with at least 5,000 pounds of plastic explosives was driven into the parking lot in front of the Khobar Towers residential complex in Dhahran. Nineteen American service members were killed in the blast, and hundreds of other service members and Saudis were injured. There is no doubt that the extent of the casualties at Khobar Towers resulted, in part, from the extraordinary size of the terrorist bomb. Reports initially estimated that the bomb contained the equivalent of 3,000 to 8,000 pounds of TNT, but a study by the Defense Special Weapons Agency concluded that the power of the bomb was actually closer to 20,000 pounds of TNT.(100 tons)

KHOBAR TOWERS BLAST SCENE


 We can talk all day about imaginary explosives that can equal a hundred tons of TNT.  We can talk ten trucks or twenty but we had one hole and a blast radius of such power and acceleration that, again, no conventional explosive could come close.  The story is almost a perfect match for Oklahoma City.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/10/gordon-duff-nuclear-terror-the-khalezov-effect-video/

________________________________________________________________________________________



.
.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

I haven't ruled out that tactical mini-nukes could have been used to take down the twins, in combination with conventional explosives.

These squibs were obviously produced by conventional demolition charges but the mini-nukes could have been placed in the basements




The amount of conventional explosives that would have been required to demolish a two 110 story building, and completely pulverise 200,000 tons of concrete is pretty huge. and just imagine how loud a conventional demolition would have been, it would have been insanely loud, deafening and unmistakable.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I have listened to three shows with Khalezov, and done a little reading and he sounds very credible.  

Here is a story he did back in January with Jim Fetzer:

http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/Jim%20 ... alezov.mp3

(You can hear Fetzer smoking dope out of a water bong throughout.  That is the gurgling sound. )

There are some interesting questions that are answered by Khalezov's story:
1) The complete demolition of the towers. All of the concrete was turned to dust. Some people explain this by Judy Woods and energy beams. The JW argument may be correct, but it seems odd to trust a huge operation to something that is untested. According to Khalezov, this complete destruction of the concrete is expected and well known.  Also he states that there has been a lot of experiments in the "constructive" uses of atomic weapons: creating gas reservoirs, building demolition, etc...  A lot of this experimentation was done underground.  

2) This explains why the ground beneath the WTC was super hot for several weeks.  An underground nuclear explosion would superheat the rock.  An ordinary controlled demolition would not do this.  

3) The silence of so many top government officials.  If the secret being kept was that the buildings were destroyed by nukes that were placed in the towers BEFORE 9/11, then it would be easy to convince many that NATIONAL SECURITY demanded secrecy.  According to Khalezov, the WTC was build with the idea of bringing them down using controlled demo via the underground nukes.  On 9/11, after the planes/missiles/whatever hit the towers, the israelis went to the government and said that there were nukes placed aboard those planes/etc.., and that if the nukes were set off it would have killed the entire city.  The israelis were "proven correct" after the missile hit the pentagon because that missile was capable of carrying a nuke.  The buildings were demolished using the underground nukes, and everyone in the know kept quiet for national security.  

Another interesting point is the arrest of Victor Bout, the "Merchant of Death", who may have been the inspiration for the Nicholas Cage movie, "Lord of War".  Khalezov, in an interview with Daniel Eustalin, stated that "[t]he Americans, understandably, demand[ed] from the Russians to find a fall guy or a patsy (or a group of fall guys) who is/are responsible for the missile that was found in the middle of the Pentagon."

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Di ... _Interview

Considering that the missile was actually nuclear-tipped (with a half-megaton thermo-nuclear warhead that is more than 25 times the size of the Hiroshima bomb) you can imagine that the Americans are quite insistent with their demands to the Russians to find, at last, the culprit and to surrender him to the US Justice.

It is indeed serious. But when it comes to the Russians, they can not admit the truth – that the "Granit" missile with its thermo-nuclear warhead was stolen from the sunken "Kursk" submarine, because Putin back in 2000 solemnly declared to the world that there were no nuclear weapons on board of the sunken submarine.

    * What is a "Granit"?

The P-700 "Granit" missile (also known by its NATO classification as "Shipwreck" or "SS-N-19" – where "N" apparently stands for "Navy") is the most advanced Soviet-era Navy missile. It is intended to be fired from submarines in submerged position and is primarily intended to destroy the US aircraft-carrier battle-groups. This is a highly sophisticated and highly "intelligent" missile. The "Granit" missiles could be used to strike battle-groups and other ship orders while fired in swarms of 12 missiles in one salvo, but could be as well used in single shots – fired against single naval targets, as well as against stationary ground targets (as was demonstrated in the case of the Pentagon strike on 9/11). Each "Granit" missile weighs about 7 tons, has length of about 10 meters, could fly up to 625 km at the supersonic speed at 2.5 Mach. Each missile is typically equipped with a standard "Navy-type" 500 kiloton thermo-nuclear warhead; conventional warheads for this missile even though exist in theory, are never used in reality – so that all without any exception "Granit" missiles in service are nuclear-tipped.
Granit missiles

This missile deems to be totally indestructible, because NATO lacks any means to shot down this missile even if they detect it in advance. In fact, it was demonstrated in the case of the Pentagon attack on 9/11 – NORAD managed to detect the upcoming "Granit" missile at least 6 minutes before it struck the Pentagon. NORAD's operational officers managed to ring the atomic alert, scramble the so-called "Doomsday plane" in response, but were not able to prevent the actual strike – the missile managed to successfully approach Washington DC and hit the wall of the Pentagon despite being detected by NORAD 6 minutes in advance. Make you own conclusions – as to the danger of this weapon. I would also like to note, that according to the Soviet and Russian strategic plans, the submarines armed with the "Granite" missiles could be used as a "back-up" option for the retaliatory nuclear strike against the United States (while the primary role in such a strike belongs to strategic intercontinental- and submarine-launched ballistic missiles, of course).

I had heard that the "plane" that hit the pentagon was really a missile, fired from an israeli submarine.  So this would be consistent with that.  
-------------
Overall, Khalezov seems believable: He is consistent and knowledgeable; His story answers more questions that it raises; He doesn't point away from the culprit israel; and mostly he answers the "how" of 9/11. If he was deliberate disinfo, I don't see who would stand to gain, except to muddy the waters about the means of bringing the towers down.  Also, I strongly believe that there have been mini nukes used in the recent past, but the government has deliberately covered this up as well; e.g. the Bali bombings.

In reply to MSMD: I agree that there were probably squibs/controlled demolition used as well.  That would explain the thermite in the dust and the mini iron spheres. This is not inconsistent with the Khalezov story.  Knowing that they only had one shot, there was probably a redundant system for bringing the towers down.  Also, if Khalezov is correct, the israelis couldn't know for sure that the US would allow the nukes to be set off.

[/tab]

.
.

Dimitri Khalezov

Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned officer of the so-called "military unit 46179", otherwise known as "the Special Control Service" of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control Service, also known as the Soviet atomic (later "nuclear") intelligence was a secret military unit responsible for detecting of nuclear explosions (including underground nuclear tests) of various adversaries of the former USSR as well as responsible for controlling of observance of various international treaties related to nuclear testing and to peaceful nuclear explosions. After September the 11th Khalezov undertook some extensive 9/11 research and proved that the Twin Towers of World Trade Center as well as its building 7 were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions – which earned the very name "ground zero" to the demolition site. Moreover, he testifies that he knew about the in-built so-called "emergency nuclear demolitions scheme" of the Twin Towers as long ago as back in the '80s – while being a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.



JB CAMPBELL: Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11


Veterans Today Staff Writer Dimitri Khalezov Talks on 9/11 and the Mysterious Death of Nick Rowe
By J B Campbell STAFF WRITER

You may not remember Nick Rowe. His 1971 book, Five Years to Freedom, told the story of his being captured by Viet Cong after a hellacious gunfight in October, 1963 and his five years as a POW, followed by his escape just before being executed. The Vietnamese Communists had just learned that he had deceived them for five years and kept from them the fact that he was in Special Forces, rather than in the engineers.

American students had passed on to the Viet Cong Central Committee their research on Nick. Hiding his true identity and the loss of face to the Reds resulted in a death sentence. He was being marched to the place of execution when a B-52 air raid scattered the firing squad and Nick whacked the one remaining guard with a limb and a circling Huey picked him up.

I met Nick when he came to Monterey in '87 to take a crash course in Tagalog at the Defense Language Institute. A mutual friend asked me to help him find a place to stay. Then he was off to a new job in Manila as the chief of the anti-terror unit of the Military Advisory Group. The Filipino Communists and the Vietnamese Communists very much wanted him assassinated, the latter just for old times' sake. And he was, but not by them.

On April 21, 1989 Nick was in an unprotected car supplied to him by the US Embassy in Manila. Bullet resistant cars for guys on the known assassination list were taken out of the budget. A car pulled up next to Nick's car and opened fire with an M-16 and a .45. He was hit in the head and elsewhere and died instantly.

Willis Carto told me shortly after Nick was shot that the infamous Mossad agent, Mike Harari, had organized the assassination.

I have been fortunate to be in contact with Dimitri Khalezov, whose blockbuster revelations about 9-11 are about to change our perception of reality for the better just as profoundly as 9-11 changed them for the worse. He has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre. First-hand means in this case, Mike Harari told him.

The world first heard about Mike Harari during the US invasion of Panama in 1989. He was known in Panama as Mr. 60%, because that's how much he took from any business deal done between Israel and Panama. He and Noriega split the take. The US invasion of Panama began at 0100 on December 20. Harari and a couple of Israeli colleagues had been warned hours earlier to get out but were caught at the airport by the 82nd Airborne. Here was the chief advisor to Manuel Noriega in drug smuggling and arms smuggling, the very crimes for which Liberace-Bush ordered the invasion. Once the paratroopers figured out who they had, they put him on the plane for Tel Aviv.

Dimitri Khalezov says that Harari told him in Bangkok that he had organized the 9-11 massacre. I mentioned Nick Rowe to Dimitri and he immediately confirmed that Harari had admitted this to him also. Harari said that he'd had to depart Manila for Bangkok because of an American colonel he'd assassinated there. Dimitri investigated and found that the colonel was James Nicholas Rowe. Harari's actual assassin had been careless and had left clues that would tie him to the Israeli. So this shows that Dimitri truly had a confidential relationship with Mike Harari, who he says is an Israeli national hero smaller in stature only to Ben-Gurion or Golda Meir. His revelations about Harari must be taken very seriously, just as his explanations of the nuclear demolition of the three WTC buildings and the Granit missile attack on the Pentagon must be taken seriously. All in all, Dimitri Khalezov has solved the (so far) crime of the 21st Century.

Dimitri will be a guest on Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show on Thursday February 10, 9-10AM, the first of no doubt many interviews to come.

Dimitri's video series on the nuclear demolitions and the missile attack have been heavily suppressed by YouTube and Google over the past year, but are now quite available from various on-line sources. His latest interview is here.

His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter. For those not familiar with his basic position, gained from his professional experience as a Soviet nuclear security officer, a joint US/USSR treaty called the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Explosions allowed the use of nukes for the demolition of tall buildings, specifically the WTC and Sears Tower in Chicago (which is now reportedly owned by Lucky Larry Silverstein). The New York Port Authority insisted that the architects provide a means for demolition of the buildings when their useful lives inevitably ended. The famous Maryland firm of Controlled Demolition, Inc – the Loizeaux family – came up with the nuclear demolition plan after the WTC architects could offer no other way to bring down their massively-built towers. Dimitri points out that this was a theoretical plan, made to satisfy the Port Authority that the buildings could be demolished. But the plan was there from the beginning. And it was Controlled Demolition, Inc that was put in charge of removing the debris of the 9-11 attack.

The twelve-foot round holes punched through six steel-reinforced structural walls of the three rings of the Pentagon could only have been produced by the seven-ton steel Granit ("Shipwreck") naval cruise missile, which is designed to strike aircraft carriers right at the waterline. Hence, the very low entry point on the outer wall that left no damage to the lawn.

Dimitri has also been pressed into service to Viktor Bout, a fellow Russian who was lured into Bangkok by the Americans to be framed for supplying the stolen Granit missile, stolen from the sunken submarine Kursk. Dimitri says that the Granit that hit the Pentagon was carrying a disconnected 500 kiloton warhead that would have flattened Washington DC. The yield by comparison of our Hiroshima uranium bomb was estimated at 15 kilotons, or 15,000 tons of TNT. And our Nagasaki plutonium bomb's yield was estimated at 21 kilotons. So, we can now grasp how easily our national capital could have been moved to Denver, as some say is the plan after the destruction of Washington DC.

The reader should become familiar with Dimitri Khalezov and his great contributions to our understanding what the hell happened on September 11, 2001.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/08/jb-campbell-dimitri-khalezov-on-9-11/

.
.

[/tab]

.
.

Great, Some healthy debate (at last) going on. Chuck Boldwyn at the Fetzer show discarding Khalezov's hypothesis but they saying that this Mini Nukes part can be a possible ingredient -anyway-  in the explanation of what brought down those towers down, but not in the way Khalezov theorized about. TO BE CONTINUED . . .

Chuck Boldwyn
 
9/11 WTC Physics

[mp3:1ahitbm3]http://nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-chuck%20boldwyn%202011%20feb.mp3[/mp3:1ahitbm3]


http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/



http://911scholars.ning.com/photo/photo ... 1yn9psh0j2


Is this the Nuclear Blast Hole beneath a WTC Tower that Dimitri Khalizov reported would result from a 150 KiloTon Bomb underground nuclear explosion???



Dimitri Khalizov's Nuclear Thesis for the Demolishment of the WTC Twin Towers using three 150 KiloTon Bombs, one for each Twin Tower & one for WTC-7




Very Large, Gaping Holes from High Explosives, even mini-nukes, or multiples of nukes


.
.

[Whaler]

GORDON DUFF: 9/11 AND THE TWO STAGE "KHALEZOV EFFECT"

THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY, WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT, WHO OR HOW?

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/02/19 ... ov-effect/

Two years ago, the 9/11 Truth movement was unheard of by most Americans.  Reviled by the mainstream press, insulted by politicians and looked on as a fringe group by many, it lived in a virtual backwater, powerless, frustrated and brimming over with righteous indignation.

That is no longer the case.  Today, with 4 of 5 Americans turning to the alternative media, having lost all confidence in the phony "right v. left" dialog espoused by the media giants, 9/11 doubters are mainstream.

With polls typically showing "Truther" backing at between 60 and 80 percent worldwide, the mainstream media now appears as it should, a source for press releases from governments that have begun to crumble around the world, even in America as we are now seeing in Wisconsin and Ohio.

The most disturbing aspect of this shift in perspective is that influence over public opinion has fallen to those who don't understand "the game."  Alternative media fought for attention through exploiting mistrust in government and the "sex" of conspiracies, real and provable and, too often, insubstantial distractions.

The spotlight fell on those unprepared.

The pseudo-alternative media giant, Huffington Post, demonstrated by its merger with mainstream giant AOL, that telling the truth is both lonely and unrewarding.  Huffington had shed itself of "truth tellers" long ago.

The "corporate" media, during the "post Cronkite generation" had been lulled into trading complicity for access, alternatively receiving press releases and selling them as "journalism" or peddling misdirection as "leaks" and investigative journalism.

The press had become as complicit as the kidnappers and torturers they kowtowed to.

People were looking for answers.  The corporate press didn't have them.  It was tasked with selling 'status quo' beliefs that didn't explain the economic devastation, the endless scandals, the purposeless wars and the eventual debunking of the very foundations of government and society.  The magic 80% that looked to the alternative media knew, and very rightly so, that the plots were real and the villains more dastardly than any TV bad guy.

Three individuals brought down "the system."

   1. David Ray Griffin
   2. Christopher Bollyn
   3. Richard Gage

One individual utterly discredited the mainstream media, more through his own duplicity and deception than anything else.  History is about results, not intentions and toward that end, our next name, though ineptitude alone, helped change the world.

   1. Julian Assange

In a just world, these three and maybe a dozen more would wear the Medal of Freedom.  Few people since the crucifixion of Christ have suffered as these three.  In the end, our age will carry the marks of these four more than any Bush or Obama.  One name will be added here, one few know.

   1. Dimitri Khalezov

DIMITRI

Khalezov is a former Soviet Army officer who worked in the highly secretive world of nuclear detection.  The doors he opens threaten our view of the last decades, revealing a secret world of deception too devastating for most to accept.  However, as bizarre as his stories may seem, of everyone discussing 9/11, only Dimitri Khalezov has the resume that places him at the forefront.

The rest of us talk about 9/11, profess our theories and connect "dots," real or imagined, moving the public toward a truth that may well be what the public wishes to believe than what is real.

That has been the trap.

Only Dimitri can testify, not "connect."  When Dimitri tells us that Mossad Operations Chief Mike Harari admitted planning 9/11, it is because Dimitri was there.  This is testimony, not conjecture, backed by a willingness to take a lie detector test.

No other 9/11 evidence carries this weight.  Science shouldn't be subjective, but we all know better.  After 9/11, the National Institute of Standards produced a lengthy document, thousands of pages, filled with junk science and ludicrous conjecture.  The 9/11 Commission went even further than that, although most members now admit such, to their credit.

Khalezov says, "Arrest that man, he did it and I will testify."

This is why his name is listed.

Khalezov also states, backed by an offer of a lie detector test, that, while a Soviet Officer in their nuclear services, he was briefed on the placement of large nuclear demolition charges under the WTC and Sears Tower.

Thus, Khalezov brings two things to the table, admissible testimony in a criminal conspiracy trial that includes Israeli intelligence in the planning and execution of 9/11 and the presence of nuclear demolition devices as known to the Soviet government in accordance with treaties between the two states.

Please not that these "demolition charges" are thermonuclear, buried many meters under the sub-basement and virtually radiation free.

These were not, are not "micro-nukes."

I have sat trough hours of debriefings of Dimitri which included American nuclear weapons specialists.  Mostly I learned of my own ignorance.  So much of what I believed about weapons and radiation was very wrong and I am not entirely unfamiliar with such things.

Below is a 2002 article from USA today.  There are many such articles that are "out there" which some should wish were not.

In this article, dots are connected that lead many places, some support Dimitri Khalezov and some support Richard Gage, both of whom espouse different scientific theories for the purposeful destruction of the World Trade Center by something other than 'terrorism."

Richard Gage proved that jet fuel can never weaken or melt steel.  Debunkers attempt to show how forms of thermite would be difficult to apply.

Those same "debunkers" are a "piece of work."  If thermite or "nanothermite" is, as "they" claim, unable to destroy the massive structural steel beams that resist thousands of degrees of heat, how could a relatively cool kerosene fire (jet fuel is kerosene) that would have trouble burning a steak on a grill, be so much more powerful?

By the same measure, if a diesel car caught fire, it might just melt through to the center of the earth, according to the wild conjecture represented by the National Institute of Standards in their report on 9/11.  Junk science, nothing more.  Ever hear of a kerosene torch used in welding?

End of story!

Read the censored story below.  See if you can figure why it has been hidden so long.  What deadly errors are exposed in it?  Look for the mistakes and the lies meant to cover them up.
Some World Trade Center victims were 'vaporized'

01/15/2002 – Updated 08:28 PM ET USA Today

NEW YORK (AP) — Three months after the World Trade Center attack, victims' families are being forced to face the ghastly possibility that many of the dead were "vaporized," as the medical examiner put it, and may never be identified. So far, fewer than 500 victims have been positively identified out of the roughly 3,000 feared dead.

Sixty were identified solely through DNA. The city and state have allowed victims' families to obtain death certificates without proof of a body, but many families place great importance on an ID based on actual remains. "Until you have something tangible, you just keep hoping — maybe there'll be some sort of miracle," said Jeanne Maurer, whose 31-year-old daughter, Jill Campbell, is presumed dead. "You can't accept it until you have something. "I still say, 'My daughter's missing,"' Maurer said. Many victims will undoubtedly be identified. Nearly 10,000 body parts have been pulled from the mountains of mangled metal and matchstick-size splinters at ground zero.

But Dr. Charles Hirsch, the chief medical examiner, triggered an angry response two weeks ago when he told grieving relatives that many bodies — no one is sure how many — had been "vaporized" and were beyond identification. Hirsch declined to be interviewed.

But spokeswoman Ellen Borakove said he meant that bodies were consumed by blazing fuel from the two crashed airliners, or "rendered into dust" when the 1,100-foot skyscrapers collapsed, one concrete slab floor onto another. Dr. Michael Baden, the state's chief forensic pathologist and a top expert in the field, said in September that most bodies should be identifiable because the fires — while hot enough to melt steel — did not reach the 3,200-degree, 30-minute level necessary to incinerate a body.

(Editor's note:  Steel melts at 2800 degrees Fahrenheit , reached in sustained immersion during a smelting process.    Crematoriums typically reach a temperature of 1600 degrees Fahrenheit.  Jet fuel fires are unable to sustain temperatures in excess of 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.  Aluminum melts at 1200 degrees Fahrenheit and aircraft aluminum turns to vapor long before steel would begin to weaken from heat.   Please check on this yourselves.)

Borakove said her office agrees with Baden's calculation — as applied to a full body. "But when the planes hit the buildings, the bodies that were in the planes as well as some of the bodies that were in the buildings were fragmented upon impact, and those fragments burn more quickly," she said.

The combination of fire and compression from tons of rubble could reduce a human body to a small amount of tissue and bone, said Dr. Cyril Wecht, a top forensic pathologist in Pittsburgh. And finding such small samples of DNA in 1.2 million tons of rubble spread over 16 acres is a difficult proposition. "There are pieces," he said. "But how do you identify and extract it from other similarly appearing pieces at the site — bricks, mortar, rubble?"

Marian Fontana, president of the Sept. 11 Widows and Victims' Families Association, said: "My fear is that financial incentives will cause the city to clean up the site quickly, rather than to treat it as a retrieval site and do things in a dignified way." Her firefighter husband, Dave, is among the missing. In particular, families are worried that remains will end up at the Staten Island landfill where trade center debris is taken and sorted.

"The remains shouldn't end up in the garbage heap," Maurer said. Forensic pathologists are trying to match the DNA of tissue taken from ground zero with the DNA of known victims. Victims' posting.php?mode=reply&f=6&t=13965

Code Select Expand

families have supplied clothes, hairbrushes and other personal items from which DNA could be lifted for comparison. Hirsch's task is unprecedented in size.

After the Oklahoma City bombing, all 168 people killed were eventually identified. But even after four years, some of the recovered tissue and bone were never linked to any of the victims.

Borakove said recently developed computer software enables more efficient DNA identification. In the meantime, some families, like the Maurers, are waiting to schedule services. "We're not ready really for a memorial," said her father, Joseph Maurer. "We'll do a funeral with remains — if we find them."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Check out the comment section....very interesting reading.

Dimitri Khalezov says:
February 20, 2011 at 1:19 am

P.S. a newly composed information. After yesterday's show of mine with Gordon Duff and Kevin Barrett, Kevin received some response which he forwarded to me. I think may be community will be interested in my answers. My answers are separated by —————- from the actual "debunking" points below:

Conclusion and a challenge The hard physical evidence presented is strongly against the hypothesis that mini-nukes destroyed the WTC Towers: ——————– I have never claimed that the WTC was destroyed by "mini-nukes". I claimed it was destroyed by 150-kiloton thermonuclear (aka 'hydrogene') charges exploded deep underground.

1. Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis. —————————— I am not sure about "nano-curie level", because I am not a scientist and I haven't participate in sampling and analyzing, but I could say that the 55x times or so elevated levels of Tritium were found DESPITE the fact that firefighters CONTINUOUSLY, FOR MANY DAYS poured HUGE amounts of waters into the WTC cavities thus causing a GREAT DEAL OF DISSOLVING of the disputed substances. And yes, I agree that elevated levels of a thermonuclear fuel is the primary indication that thermonuclear charges were used. And this is exactly what I claim.

2. The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers. ————————— of course, it is logical to presume so. Because the actual nuclear reaction happened deep underground. So, it is logical to presume that the lower you go the higher radioactivity levels you encounter and the vice-versa. This perfectly matches my actual claims.

3. Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the mini-nuke hypothesis. —————————- total garbage. Absolutely unsubstantiated claim tantamount to a claim that "there is a life on the Mars" or that "Timothy McVeigh was indeed put to death and not just given a new identity" (since nobody is going to verify it anyway). First of all, why the admitted "radioactive hot-spots" were found whatsoever? If it were kerosene or so-called "nano-thermite" that did the actual demolition job? Was kerosene radioactive? Or was the so-called "nano-thermite" radioactive?

Radioactivity "hot-spots" were due to thermonuclear explosions underground and not to "industrial uses (not bombs)". And it was not "Radium", found at ground zero, but Barium, Strontium, Thorium, Cerium, Lanthanum, Yttrium – all those classical radio-nuclides that are typically left by nuclear explosions. Plus Trititum that is typically left by thermonuclear explosions.

4. Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium, actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background level for WTC dust. ——————– but why should it be in the WTC dust? When dust was created well above the spot of the actual underground nuclear explosions? The WTC dust owes its existence to merely mechanical processes – it was created by the pressure wave. The WTC dust has nothing to do with radioactivity, indeed. But the method proposed by Lioy at. al should not dupe you. They shamelessly exploit your supposed ignorance. The radioactivity was concentrated inside deep underground cavities and was gradually released with vapors, and not with dust.

5. Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) —————————– lie. Blatant lie. These shameless guys take a good use of the fact that the actual radioactivity measurements were classified by the US Government. It should not dupe you into believing them.

and again provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis. ———————- I have never claimed the "mini-nukes" hypothesis. I claimed that 3×150 kiloton thermonuclear charges (8 times the Hiroshima bomb each) were used to destroy the three WTC buildings.

6. No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near ground zero. —————— yes, because the "radiation burning" (aka "beta-burning") results from being subjected to an instant flow of fast electrons (aka "beta-radiation") flying to every direction from a hypocenter of a nuclear explosion. Since in that case the actual explosions occurred deep underground all their primary radiations (X-, beta- and gamma- inclusive) were stopped by the surrounding rock and could not reach the surface. However, it does not mean that there were "no radiation poisoning" on account of the most dangerous alpha-radiation. The alpha-particles were carried by vapors ascending from the deep underground cavities beneath the debris and the gullible ground zero responders (who did not bother to open a pre-9/11 dictionary and to check what 'ground zero' did mean in the pre-9/11 English language) were freely inhaling these alpha-particles. And now all of them developed classical chronic radiation sickness. Many of them died from leukemia and other kinds of radiation-related cancers. And many are dying right now.

William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse. ————————- as far as I can recollect William Rodriguez survived not the nuclear explosion that actually collapsed the Tower, but he survived a so-far unexplained explosion in the basement that coincided in time with the explosion on the upper floors (aka the "plane's impact"). Rodriguez got out of the Tower well before the Tower was demolished. Because if not, only microscopic dust would remain of poor Willy's mortal body.

7. No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers. ——————— the "pre-collapse process" took not more than a few milliseconds. Considering that waves generally travel in metals at a speed of roughly 4 kilometers per second while the Twin Towers were ~350 meters (I mean their pulverized parts; the entire Towers were ~415 meters high), we could conclude that the entire "pre-collapse process" took about 0.086 second only. Why should any "melting of glass" occur? Especially considering that it was a "cold" process – effects of the "pressure wave" that had nothing to do with high temperatures? This argument is taken out of the blue. It is the same if I ask why do you believe that the United States are located on the American continent, while crocodiles do not live in Siberian rivers?

8. One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.) ————————– as I have said many times I have never claimed any "mini-nukes" were used. I claimed that three huge 150 kiloton thermonuclear charges were used. The WTC-7 was much shorter than the WTC Twin Towers and as such it was "dustified" in its entirety, without any heavy undamaged tops that could pressure downwards (such as in the case with the Twins). That is why the WTC-7 was instantly transformed into a compressed pile of dust that was about to disintegrate under its own weight. And it indeed happened. It started to crumble from its lowest parts (that logically sustained the heaviest pressure compare to the upper parts of that "dustified" structure). And so the former building went down. But it went down too fast, so some dust from the upper parts of the WTC-7 could not catch up with it and so it was "delaying". It is clearly visible on available movies showing the WTC-7 collapse. There are clearly visible two different sources of dust – ascending dust from beneath and "delaying" dust left by the falling WTC-7's top that went down too fast. Thus your claim that what you call "vertically-directed plumes of dust" allegedly did not exist is not true. Something of this kind is clearly visible on the WTC-7 collapse's videos.

Sincerely yours,
Dimitri Khalezov.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TjBronco says:
February 20, 2011 at 3:15 am

Dimitri, while you might be accurate, or not. I appreciate the post. One known fact is three buildings dropped like a sack of potatos. We all love potatos, don't we?! I was just perusing a couple of sights, about the 911 truth movement. -Lots of Class A1 Manipulators, including left wing, and left wing religious groups, and Right winger, loser assholes as well...You were mentioned here or there, and other prominent manipulaters were as well. Three buildings dropped in freefall form that day. No Physical, Physics, could have helped them be on their way, except for some explosive devices. Was it one nuclear type 'bomb' a 'Q' type classification as determined earlier? -Or was it more respectfully, a series of some type of mix to take down,-former Port Authorities Buildings, the white Elephants, the drain on NYC's, asbestos filled, desired to be brought down by controlled demolitions,drain on the City's Revenues.?! What was that Dick's name?-Oh yes Giulliani. I do not put the blame on him in any way, just that he is a contributing, conspiring, full of Shit Schill as well. Thanks for the info. _And 'Poor Willy" wrote a book called 'last man out'- William Rodriguez, Janitor, Hero. He was even invited to the White House by Gearge Bush. If you see the picture of him and Bush shaking hands, you can see the FEAR in Bushes eyes, that this man may know more than Bush wishes he did...He was in the Basement and one of the few to descibe the primary explosions...I'm not saying you or Gordon are innacurate, just that one man did see, hear, survive, any explosion from the basement. I do not believe he has of late contracted Cancer.- There is way mor .Sir, Dimitri, look forward to hearing more of your story. I do not doubt for a second about Harari, and the Mossad.-That's a given, yet how did the potatos fall??
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ross says:
February 20, 2011 at 4:07 am

Dimitri,I suggest you get a team of scientists together like Prof Neils Harritt and publish a peer reviewed paper.They found unexploded nano-thermite/reacted thermite and steel micro spheres right thoughout the dust.

Why do you deny the use of nano-thermite and the aircraft that many witnesses saw crash into the towers ?

How was a single nuke able to cause the rippling effect of mutliple explosions down the towers? How do you explain the squibs or mistimed explosions way below the major destruction zone?

What caused the streams of molten steel to pour out just before the collapse?

How did the towers collapse from the top down when you assert that a single nuke under each building was the sole cause? Surely the energy would have been greatest nearest the explosion.

Why did WTC 7 collapse in the reverse fashion when you say the same device was used?

3 x 150 kilotonne nukes would surely displace the foundations of all surrounding buildings.Why would they risk destroying the entire area?

There is a piece of concrete and melted steel called the "Meteorite".This should be full of evidence to support your theory.

You need to publish a peer reviewed scientific paper.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dimitri Khalezov says:
February 20, 2011 at 11:29 am

Dimitri,I suggest you get a team of scientists together like Prof Neils Harritt and publish a peer reviewed paper. They found unexploded nano-thermite/reacted thermite and steel micro spheres right thoughout the dust. ———————- the mere fact that they "found" the so-called "nano-thermite", moreover "unexploded" (despite the apparent fact that thermite is not an explosive, but incendiary) points that these guys are shills at the service of the US Government. I have nothing to do with the shills. The rest of their "findings" are irrelevant in the view of the first "find" – the so-called "nano-thermite". If someone is a prove liar, it does not matter what else he "found". You can't afford such a luxury as to believe his claims. I am sorry, I am brutal, but this is the only way to deal with the shills.

Why do you deny the use of nano-thermite —————————- because I was not informed while in the Soviet Special Control Service that the WTC emergency demolition scheme was based on so-called "nano-thermite". I was informed it was based on the underground thermonuclear charges. Moreover, as just a former military officer I could promise you that so-called "nano-thermite" does not exist in reality. It exists only in sick imaginations of the governmental shills who want to cheat you in that way and to distract your attention from the fact that the WTC was destroyed by nuclear explosions.

and the aircraft that many witnesses saw crash into the towers ? ——————— as many witnesses did not see any planes. If you don't believe me – go to my YouTube channel here: http://www.youtube.com/DimitriKhalezov#g/u and you will find at least 8 video clips where eye-witnesses did not see any planes, but only explosions. Why would I believe the bogus "witnesses" planted by the Freemasons if I know first of all that aluminum can not penetrate steel by definition and the Boeings-767 can not fly at thief full cruse speed at the claimed altitude? I am a reasonable man, after all, friendly with the common sense. And if you go to my YouTube channel and watch the clips you will see that my claims are also supported by real eye-witnesses.

How was a single nuke able to cause the rippling effect of mutliple explosions down the towers? ————————— I do not see any "multiple explosions down the towers". I see only the tower's tops crashing dust under themselves while falling down at the free-falls speed.

How do you explain the squibs or mistimed explosions way below the major destruction zone? —————————- by the same way as the otherwise cheating NIST report explains them (I agree with the NIST report only on this point alone, don't accuse me of being the NIST's supporter). Namely: these were merely pockets of air pressed out by the pressure of the falling tops. They were by no means "explosions".

What caused the streams of molten steel to pour out just before the collapse? ————————- I did not see any "streams of molten steel pouring". All I saw was a strange sparkling (most probably of aluminum coating, and not of steel) in only a single spot, or maximum in a two single spots. Perhaps, it was a type of thermitic-type reaction which has nonetheless nothing to do either with thermite, or with so-called "nano-thermite". It is merely the way aluminum could burn in certain conditions. Considering it was only in one (maximum two) isolated spots this in any case could not add anything to the towers collapses. Don't cheat yourselves trying to exaggerate an alleged importance of this fact. It is clearly irrelevant considering the Towers' actual size, length and the total areas of the 4 facades of two Towers. These two small isolated spots of sparkling of the very low intensity can not be counted as anything really important that could contribute to the Towers' collapse.

How did the towers collapse from the top down when you assert that a single nuke under each building was the sole cause? —————————- read my explanation above (I have to big posts above). Otherwise it is a bit impolite – not to even bother to read what I have said above before asking this question. I have already explained it.

Surely the energy would have been greatest nearest the explosion. ——————– and it was. The highest temperatures were in the underground cavities. Don't even doubt it.

Why did WTC 7 collapse in the reverse fashion when you say the same device was used? ——————– again. Explained above. Read my posts above. Don't force me to repeat myself.

3 x 150 kilotonne nukes would surely displace the foundations of all surrounding buildings. —————— based upon what grounds do you state this? Are you a mathematician who has an experience in calculating underground nuclear explosions? Your statement is apparently based on your intuition, and not on any knowledge. But in this case the intuition badly cheats you. Don't believe it. Believe the mathematics.

Why would they risk destroying the entire area? ——————————- I don't know what to answer. Because it was not me who created such a scheme and not me who put it to the actual use on 9/11. Address this question to Controlled Demolition Inc. Or to the Department of Buildings of New York.

There is a piece of concrete and melted steel called the "Meteorite". This should be full of evidence to support your theory. ——————————— yes, I guess it is. The so-called "nano-thermite" (even if imagine unimaginable and presume that it exists in reality) could not melt rock, concrete and steel into one piece. Apparently. I would like to state that my claims are not "theory", though. They have a very different legal status: they are witness' testimony. See the difference?

You need to publish a peer reviewed scientific paper. ——————————- I am not a scientist. I am an eye-witness. But if you find scientists who are not shills and who will agree to publish my claims, I will do it with pleasure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bink says:
February 20, 2011 at 2:18 pm

Sorry Demitri. These squibs don't look like compressed air.

[youtube:24562b4b]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoAD8HlrLZg[/youtube]24562b4b]

You don't seem to have done through research, which puts your entire theory into question.

I'm not discounting your theory that some nuclear charge may have been used but think your characterizations of people such as Neils Harritt are laughable. You know every product produced by intelligence agencies ? That's somewhat unlikely.
It was the Freemasons ? I've seen the Da Vinci Code too, but think this theory maybe off base as well.
Were they behind the "New Pearl Harbor" document ?
[youtube:24562b4b]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw[/youtube]24562b4b]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom says:
February 20, 2011 at 7:59 am

Hi Dimitri,
Your reconstruction of the WTC collapses seems the most plausible to me, but I have other problems with your story. Here is a couple of them:

1) The Pentagon missile: you say that it was a missile stolen from the sinken Kursk Russian submarine, and that it was not launched from a US gov't entity. But then it would have required a suitable platform with a lot of technology and extremely skilled operators. This sounds quite unplausible. Who then? And why?

2) You speak quite vaguely about who and why commissioned the attack referring to "masons" and NWO. What is your take on the extremely detailed reconstruction by E.P. Heidner, "collateral damage" that you can find here (in 2 parts):

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49189603

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49189482


Many thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dimitri Khalezov says:
February 20, 2011 at 10:39 am

To answer your 1st question. I don't' think it is really difficult to launch a missile. Missile in general is quite an autonomous thing and all you need is to set it to a right direction and to a certain angle of elevation before it's launch. Basically, you can launch a missile that is just leaned against a pile of wood. Skilled operators are required, but the Freemasons have these operators, don't worry. When it comes to the Pentagon as a target loaded into the missile's guidance system it was no problem at all. The Pentagon as being the Defense Ministry of the Main Adversary of the former USSR was pre-loaded (I mean its coordinates were pre-loaded) and in the list of targets by their priority it occupied the very first position). So the "extremely skilled operators" didn't even need to bother to enter the Pentagon's coordinates – they were there from the beginning. Just point the missile to ther right direction, lean it against something to obtain the right angle of elevation and make it to fly. Some relatively minor difficulties could have been easily settled in this sense. So, what kind of "suitable platform" you are talking about? Any surface ship with primitive launch-tube positioned below the water surface (to imitate submarine's launch conditions) would suffice.

2) I speak quite vaguely as to who pressed the button to launch the missile. It is because I was not there and I don't know who did it. I can confirm to you that: a) it was a Granit missile; b) it was stolen by the Freemasons from the sunken Kursk submarine (and not by "Merchant of Death" Victor Bout from the Ukrainian warehouse of the Black Sea fleet as alleged); c) it was with its usual half-megaton thermonuclear warhead; d) it was launched from the Atlantic (see the fact that the first bunch of the jets was sent over the Atlantic in response to the Pentagon attack for confirmation of this fact); e) the detonator of the thermonuclear warhead was intentionally broken as not to cause the actual half-megaton explosion; f) NORAD detected the missile at minimum 6 minutes before it hit the wall of the Pentagon (perhaps even 7 minutes), and it managed to ring the atomic alert and scramble the Doomsday plane (as a result of the alert Cheney and Rice were quickly taken into an anti-atomic bunker under the White House – this is well-known fact, while the acting commander of the NORAD has departed from his peace-time command post to the protected command post and ordered to close its anti-atomic doors for the first time in the US history).

This is all I know. But you demand from me to tell you who launched the missile? I don't know. I only can tell you it was surely the Freemasons, but who of the Freemasons personally pressed the button or what was the type of the ship that fired the missile I don't know. I was not there. Hope you realize it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AS says:
February 20, 2011 at 9:05 am

how deep do you think these nuke charge were pre-placed, I believe that they built a concrete podle to make sure to 'channelize' the flux of the explosion upside and make it looks like a tectonic movement, like in the tusnami effect in 2006...

Leukemia and malformations would be the most evidence that a nuclear explosion went off during 911... water and soil is contaminated... easy to trace it to the origin of the explosion...

Telle us more about the french section ... are they involved in the next operation, did they transfer russian nukes in Europe, 6 differents team... and wanted to blame chechens living in south of france bizarrely beside the russian zionist jewsih mafia, in Nice, Corse etc... what do you know about thiss did Harari spoke about these operations ?

Why Putin rushed in the artic sea affair... netherlands, britain, and germany are known to sell russian nuclear material in the black market, they got it form the russian jewish mafia based in london and hungary, this is well known world wide... why you russian are not outspoken about these facts... are you waiting for 1 millions deaths to move or are some parts of the russian khazars part of this operation... ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR.NUR says:
February 20, 2011 at 1:06 pm

MR.AS: WHY DO YOU ALWAYS ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS: WE TOLD YOU MANY TIMES YOU CAN DOWNLOAD DIMITRI'S BOOK FOR FREE. WHY DON'T YOU READ IT AND THEN ASK?? OR IS IT JUST THE PLEASURE OF ASKING RATHER THAN THAT OF LEARNING??
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I haven't read through his book.  Does he explain how the "Bathtub" remained intact after a tactical-nuke created a "cavity"?  I'd think the Hudson river would just flood after creating a "pocket" like that...--CSR

[/tab]

.
.
Well, good with some debate about this, food for thoughts, here

http://takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm

The Dimitri Khalezov "WTC was nuked" hoax

Introduction

For years, various disinformation agents have been attempting to sabotage the 9/11 truth movement with claims that "mini-nukes" or "nuclear devices" were used to demolish the World Trade Center. The fact that the Twin Towers and WTC7 (Building 7) were destroyed in a series of controlled demolitions is not in doubt; more than 1,400 architectural and engineering professionals have called for a new, truly independent investigation and cited evidence of controlled demolitions at all three collapsed WTC steel-framed high-rises. In April 2009 a paper published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal was the final nail in the coffin for the government version of events, proving that nano-thermite was used to bring down the Twin Towers and WTC 7 in a series of controlled demolitions. The study, conducted by a group of independent scientists, found a highly energetic, unreacted thermitic material in samples of dust taken from the vicinity of the WTC following its catastrophic destruction.

Prior to publication of that peer-reviewed paper, a plethora of evidence for controlled demolitions had included numerous reports of molten steel and molten metal found in the debris pile - some of which was analyzed and found to be abundant in iron -  iron-rich spherules indicating a previously molten state that were found in the WTC dust (including a sample collected ten minutes after collapse of the North Tower, eliminating the possibility of contamination from the clean up), an orange-yellow flow of molten material from the South Tower caught on video in the minutes preceding collapse indicative of an iron-rich melt and totally at odds with the "office fires" scenario, heavily sulfidated steel and partly evaporated steel members from WTC7 that were fireproofed with Monokote MK-5 which (according to NIST-sponsored tests on thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity at Anter Laboratories) outperforms the Cafco Blaze-Shield types DC/F and II used in the Towers.

Pre-2001 studies found that the WTC Towers would survive a 600 mph impact from a jetliner, and predicted that the buildings would remain standing even if all of the jet fuel had been dumped inside and ignited a horrendous fire that killed many people. Apart from the three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/2001, there have never been any instances of steel-framed high-rises that totally collapsed as a result of fire. It just doesn't happen. And everyone agrees that the structural damage - much exaggerated in the case of Building 7 that was not even hit by a plane - was insufficient to bring down the buildings. In subsequent tests sponsored by NIST on corresponding floor assemblies subjected to greater heat exposure and protected with less fireproofing than at the WTC on 9/11, it was found that the test specimens "were able to sustain the maximum design load" without collapsing for as long as the tests were run: 2 to 3 1/2 hours.

The absurdity of the "WTC was nuked" hoax

An excellent refutation of the "WTC was nuked" claims was provided by Dr. Steven E. Jones, entitled "Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers". He summarized a few key points as:

Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.
The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.
Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the mini-nuke hypothesis.
Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium, actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background level for WTC dust.
Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis.
No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near ground zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse.
No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers.
One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.)
Some promoters of the "nuclear demolitions" baloney, such as Gordon Duff, cite as 'evidence' a claim that 9/11 first responders have been dying from "radiation sickness".



Source: Veterans Today

This particular brand of idiocy is dealt with in an article by Kevin Ryan entitled "Energetic Materials as a Potential Cause of the 9/11 First Responder Illnesses".

However, the fact that there is less evidence for nuclear explosions at the WTC than there is of Elvis living underwater in Loch Ness makes no odds to the liars and shills who cover for Israel's central role in 9/11. The "WTC was nuked" disinformation is being propagated by Zionist agents whose job is to portray 9/11 truth advocates as slack-brained, knuckle-dragging, scientifically illiterate, paranoid buffoons. An individual who was too gormless to understand concepts such as tritium concentration, isotopes of iodine, radioactive fallout, neutron activation or electromagnetic pulses (EMP, an extremely low frequency component is present in underground nuclear explosions even when high frequencies are attenuated) would similarly be incapable of seeing through the 9/11 deception to understand that the crime was not perpetrated by "Arabs" with "box cutters". Thus, the ragtag assortment of so-called "truth tellers" and bogus "physicists" who claim that the WTC was demolished with nuclear bombs or "devices" are clearly being deliberately deceptive. The interesting thing about Dimitri Khalezov and his fellow Israel shill Gordon Duff is that they can be seen to have gone totally over the top with their claims, guaranteeing that they will only enjoy the support of tinfoil conspiracy kooks, and turning away any reasonably-minded, rational people who were beginning to investigate the truth about 9/11.



Source: YouTube

Review of the Barrett - Khalezov - Duff broadcast of 2/18/11
The reviews on this page mainly relate to the Truth Jihad Radio broadcast of February 18, 2011, which may be downloaded from:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_11.html

Kevin Barrett interviews Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff. The audio is also available minus the breaks, which chops 30 minutes off the original two hours. See the videos at the following links:

http://radio.rumormillnews.com/podcast/ ... ikhalezov/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brQqRLCx ... dded#at=33

Times quoted below relating to this February 18 show are the times into the 90-minute video.

Kevin Barrett kicks off with a general summary of Dimitri Khalezov's claims. Khalezov, whose main claim to fame is his peddling of the "WTC was nuked" nonsense, purports to be a Russian "specialist in nuclear weapons" who got acquainted with Mossad operations chief Michael Harari because they were both based in Bangkok, and Harari needed an interpreter who could speak Russian and English. Harari was born in 1927, so would have been 74 at the time of 9/11. Most of his Mossad activities took place in the Seventies. At around 8:00, Gordon Duff says that Khalezov "volunteered to take a lie detector test", the last time Duff and Barrett talked with him. Duff then invites Khalezov to give his account of what happened on September 12, 2001, the day after 9/11.

Khalezov claims to have had breakfast with Harari and his son on the morning of September 12, 2001, at 7:00 a.m. Bangkok time. The elder Harari was said to be "almost dancing", and supposedly bragged of "organizing 9/11". This little bit of disinformation from Khalezov is rather reminiscent of a story about a "conversation in Hebrew" that was promoted in 2006 by a certain Texas-based "patriot" who "supports the Jewish State of Israel" (listen to this video at 3:10), a "patriot" who readily admits his wife is of Jewish descent (1:34 in this video) and whose advertisers are Jewish. At 11:05, Khalezov says he "used to know some other Mossad agents in Bangkok", who eventually introduced him to Mike Harari, who needed a Russian interpreter who understood weapons terminology.

Duff says (12:46), "There were nuclear demolition materials built into the base of the buildings in the World Trade Center", and this was "a secret project done in coordination with the US government." Barrett (around 1:07:30) later confirms the claim that the nuclear "demolition devices" were "installed beneath the Twin Towers when they were built." Given that the North Tower was completed in December 1972 and the South Tower in July 1973, that would bring the Nixon administration into the plot. Richard Nixon couldn't even cover up Watergate, yet the "nukes built into the basement" conspiracy was supposedly kept under wraps for nearly 40 years!

This Barrett show has plenty of extravagant claims, apart from 9/11. For example, Khalezov says, after encouragement from Duff (15:15), that the Russians detected a "nuclear explosion" under Chernobyl in 1986, a "mini-nuke" under the 4th reactor of the Chernobyl plant. He goes on to suggest that the Chernobyl disaster was triggered by some group associated with the New World Order project, possibly the Freemasons, who used a "mini-nuke" to make it appear as if the reactor had "exploded on its own", in order to damage the nuclear power industry.

The generally accepted view is that the 1983 twin bombings in Beirut of the US and French barracks involved the equivalent of six tons of TNT delivered by a "gas-enhanced device", similar to a fuel-air / thermobaric weapon. Khalezov claims (18:00 - 18:40) that both bombs were "nuclear", equivalent to "100 tons" of TNT. Decades later, as of 2002, the International Monitoring System - which monitors the "tens of thousands of [daily] seismic events" in an attempt to identify clandestine nuclear tests or explosions - was understood to have a detection threshold of 1 to 2 kilotons. However, in 2006 the IMS detected North Korea's nuclear test - reckoned to be "less than one kiloton" - still a far cry from six or even 100 tons, and helped by the fact that Pyongyang had provided six days' advance warning of its intentions.

The September 16, 1999 bombing of an apartment building in Volgodonsk, Russia, allegedly by Chechen separatists, was a nuclear device, according to Duff and Khalezov (27:30). They make a seemingly interesting point that a CNN report - which was apparently later pulled – said the bomb was equivalent to 300 tons of TNT, and they asked how you can fit that much conventional explosive into a "postal van". That CNN report quotes "100-300 tons of TNT", and says the explosives were either hidden in a "truck" or an "underground pipe". However, the explosive was found to be RDX (hexogen), which has about 1.5 times the explosive power of TNT, Each bomb in the series of Russian apartment explosions is believed to have contained 200 to 300 kilograms of hexogen of Russian manufacture, and the CNN report obviously confused tons with kilograms.

Gennadiy Seleznyov, Russian Duma speaker of the Communist party, announced to the Russian Parliament that an apartment building had been blown up in Volgodonsk on September 13, hours after the second of two apartment bombings in Moscow, but three days before the Volgodonsk explosion. Then, on September 22, FSB agents were caught red-handed planting a bomb in Ryazan. They unconvincingly claimed the bomb was a fake made of "sugar" and the exercise was simply to test local vigilance, but the local police found the sacks contained hexogen attached to a timer and detonator. The motive for the 1999 false-flag apartment bombing campaign was to get Vladimir Putin elected in a fervour of patriotic support and to provide a pretext to invade Chechnya, following Russia's humiliating defeat in the First Chechen War. Thus, the Russian government, rather than "Chechen terrorists", is the prime suspect for the Volgodonsk blast. But the explosion was not of nuclear origin.

Khalezov says (29:40) that Harari and a younger Mossad agent traveled to Indonesia around the time of the Bali bombings of 2002, and a "mini-nuke" was used (31:40). Barrett says he had the late Joe Vialls on his show talking about the Bali bombings. Vialls claimed a "micro nuke" was used at Bali, but he also alleged that "New York" (i.e., the Jews) orchestrated the 2004 Asian tsunami, and the Soham child-killer Ian Huntley is innocent.

At 32:35, Khalezov claims he was arrested in connection with the Bali bombings, with the US government seeking his extradition. He asserts (34:10) that he was in jail for about a year and a month before the extradition charges were dropped. He says Harari was arrested on 12th October 2003, and he subsequently claims it was for "terrorism" in connection with the Bali bombings, then he says that he, Khalezov, was arrested twice, the first time on 13th August 2003, but the case was closed "on the spot" after he paid off the police – he later says he bribed them to the tune of "30,000 Euros / dollars". Then he says he was arrested again on 6th November 2003.

Khobar Towers (1996) and Oklahoma City (1995) were also nuke jobs, according to Khalezov (47:55 and 55:50).

Duff says (1:00:04) he'd rather take "Dimitri's evidence", the "only witness", as someone who has the "credibility of being involved", a "nuclear weapons specialist who has a proven relationship with Mike Harari, a long relationship with of course the Mossad operations chief." Duff attempts to discredit the overwhelming scientific physical evidence of thermite demolitions by complaining that "the idea of how [9/11] was done – the science has taken precedence over the crime itself." As of course it should, since the physical, forensic proof of controlled demolitions is far, far stronger evidence than the word of some two-bit disinformation merchant who serves as an asset to the Russian, US and Israeli governments. So it is hardly surprising that Duff tries to focus attention on "the crime itself", as opposed to the actual evidence. Duff claims, "We have direct testimony as who did it [...] and we have the evidence to bring a court case right now." Albeit one that would be doomed to failure, as the disinformation brokers are well aware. And Duff, predictably, claims the science is just "opinion". No it is not. Real scientists know that thermite was involved; liars and kooks plump for "nukes" or "direct energy beam weapons".

Duff is confirmed as a Zionist shill in the style of Jon Elinoff – he either covers for Israel, or if he does name the Mossad as involved in 9/11, he mixes in so much disinformation and sheer absurdities that the message is totally discredited when seen by anyone with any common sense or scientific knowledge.

From the subversion to the ridiculous
Khalezov makes his easily refuted, outrageous claims about 9/11, starting at around 1:06:00, when he is asked by Duff when he learnt about the nuclear "engineering devices" that were "built into the sub-basement" of the WTC. He says, "What I knew from my former service under the Soviet Special Control Service, is that under the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York, there were special nuclear demolition devices intended for the emergency demolition of the Twin Towers. And these devices was (sic) 150 kilotons thermonuclear charges, placed at the depths of 77 meters (253 feet) beneath, under the surface of the earth, or 50 meters below the foundations of the Twin Towers."

The effects of underground nuclear explosions are well documented. The Sedan underground nuclear test of July 6, 1962 used a 104 kT fusion-fission device lowered into a shaft 636 feet deep, sending a radioactive dust cloud 16,000 feet into the atmosphere and resulting in significant levels of fallout as far away as Tennessee (nearly 2,000 miles from the Sedan crater in Nevada). It displaced 12 million tons of earth, and opened up a crater 1,280 feet wide.



See here for further images and reports. No such event was observed on 9/11.

The Baneberry underground nuclear test of December 18, 1970, was only 10 kT, and buried 900 feet (274 m.) below ground, but there was a radioactive release that reached more than 10,000 feet into the atmosphere. (Cf. 1,368 feet, height of WTC1.)

At around 1:07:30, Barrett refers to "the demolition devices that were installed beneath the Twin Towers when they were built, were 150 kiloton nuclear devices, buried 77 metres beneath the surface". Duff has gone AWOL for a while at this point, and Khalezov makes the outrageous claims around 1:10:20 that the "blueprint" was "not classified in the Seventies" or "before 9/11", they "discussed that in the newspapers", and it was "public knowledge, believe me", in the Seventies "it was even discussed publicly". Unfortunately for Khalezov, although he claims to remember that, there is no evidence to support his claims, nor will there ever be any such evidence.

Soon after 1:13:00 Khalezov describes his most preposterous claim, strictly for those dead from the neck up – that New York officials decided to demolish the Towers because a nuclear-armed "cruise missile" had been fired into the Pentagon. Rather like Elinoff conflates several disinformation concepts, Khalezov combines the "nuclear demolitions" hoax with the "cruise missile" myth.

Khalezov says, "...the missile that was fired into the Pentagon was used as a pretext to demolish the World Trade Center [...] when the missile was fired into the Pentagon and found unexploded there, it was with a nuclear warhead, okay, and the fact that the missile found in the middle of the Pentagon was a nuclear missile was used by some people to convince the American officials in New York that the planes that hit the Twin Towers also had similar nuclear warheads inside the planes, and that this warhead stuck inside the Tower, I mean on the upper floors of the Twin Towers, and the warhead would produce atmospheric nuclear explosions over the high yield [...] that would be enough to incinerate the entire New York. So the American officials took this information very seriously, because the missile in the Pentagon was a very convincing argument, and they decided to demolish the Twin Towers to prevent that atmospheric nuclear explosions by those alleged warheads on top of the Towers."

Barrett says Khalezov's claim "sounds a bit hard to believe because the Pentagon was struck at 9:31 point something [according to some speculation about stopped clocks by an 'ex'-White House asset and "military affairs journalist" at the Naval Postgraduate School, the very sort of person whose testimony the no-planers reject on the grounds that they were "in on it"] or 9:36 point something [...] and the first Tower came down - the South Tower came down at something like 10:46." In fact, the Pentagon was hit at 9:37:46 and the South Tower began to collapse at 9:59:04, leaving the "officials" in New York, the Pentagon, NORAD, etc, with a mere 21 minutes and 18 seconds to ascertain that the "cruise missile" had a "nuclear warhead", to communicate with each other, to inductively reason (in this fictitious, nonsensical scenario) that the 9/11 planes that hit the Towers might also have contained nuclear warheads, to make the decision to "pull", and to find which buttons they had to press in order to "pull". Inexplicably, they then wait almost another 30 minutes to "pull" the North Tower. And it doesn't explain WTC7.

Khalezov makes a funny statement about how "The problem is that this story was well arranged." It's rather like he means a great deal of effort went into concocting his story, and he's not happy at having it debunked by Barrett. Khalezov continues with, "The missile that was fired into the Pentagon was detected by NORAD about a minimum of seven minutes before it hit the Pentagon..." Barrett asks how they knew that the missile was carrying a nuclear warhead. Khalezov says NORAD has an identification for all Soviet missiles, so they knew it was nuclear as soon as they detected it. He continues with a claim that "you have to presume that anything, which, any missile that is attacking America is nuclear."

In other words, Khalezov postulates a missile without providing any evidence for his claim, and then uses this assertion to 'explain' his bizarre conspiracy theory about a decision taken by New York officials to demolish the Towers with pre-installed thermonuclear "demolition devices". An amusing contradiction in Khalezov's 'explanation' about "nuclear warheads" on planes that had crashed into the Towers prompting a decision to demolish the Towers is that Khalezov has also promoted the "no planes at the WTC" lunacy. Khalezov peddled the nonsense about "TV fakery" and a claim that "Judging from the point of view of physics it was not technically possible for empty aluminum planes to penetrate such thick steel, irrespective of the planes' speeds." In Khalezov's unravelling web of lies, the New York officials supposedly "knew" that a "missile" with a "nuclear" warhead had been fired into the Pentagon, but they had been duped into thinking "fake" planes were real.

Duff returns online, and Khalezov explains that he was discussing why the American officials decided to demolish the Towers. There is then some discussion about Granite / Granit cruise missiles. Khalezov says the Granit missile (from the Russian Kursk submarine) that hit the Pentagon was stolen, and that it could be fired from any platform, most likely a ship, as it's easier to fire from the surface since a submarine has to be modified.

The Rayelan Rumor Mill News 2/22/11 interview of Duff and Khalezov
This is available from:

http://radio.rumormillnews.com/podcast/ ... ikhalezov/

At about 2:00, Dimitri Khalezov talks about the "nuclear warhead that was similar to the nuclear warhead of the missile that hit the Pentagon." He says, "The American officials had no choice than to believe them, and they decided to collapse the Tower to prevent atmospheric nuclear explosions." At 2:30, Gordon Duff asks him about his source for "this information", and Khalezov agrees with Duff's suggestion that it was an "FBI agent" who told him - in 2007. At 3:30 Duff asks Khalezov to confirm that, as a "member of the Soviet nuclear forces", he became aware, "due to a treaty between the Soviet Union and the United States, that there were nuclear demolitions placed under the World Trade Center, by the US government." Here it sounds like Duff is the tail wagging the dog. Then Duff gets Khalezov to talk about his relationship with Mike Harari. "Deputy Chief of Mossad [...] the CIA borrowed him from the Mossad." As Israel's shill, Duff attempts to shift the blame from the Rothschilds' international Zionist Mafia to the US government, who are merely puppets of the Rothschilds' crime syndicate.

At 11:40, Duff talks about the "nuclear devices" under the WTC and says they're not "mini-nukes"; they're "thermonuclear devices, demolition devices underneath the World Trade Center..." At 17:20, Duff claims that "nuclear munitions are used under major buildings in the US, in a highly secretive program." Since there is no evidence of such a program and nobody with an IQ above room temperature believes such a program to exist, Duff has no option but to claim the "program" is "highly secretive".

The Duff - Khalezov kaput view of conspiracies
So let's get this straight. According to Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff, 150 kTon thermonuclear "demolition devices" were installed beneath the Towers when they were built, the Nixon administration was in on it and managed to cover it up until Khalezov "exposed" it 35 years later, the choice of 150 kTon - which must have been settled before December 1972 when the North Tower was completed - was determined by the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty for which negotiations began in Moscow on October 7, 1974 and were concluded in April 1976 with the Treaty becoming legally enforceable on December 11, 1990, Rudy Giuliani and the New York authorities were tricked by the 9/11 perpetrators into detonating three 150 kTon thermonuclear devices in Manhattan in an attempt to prevent potential devastation to the City of New York from suspected nuclear warheads that might or might not have existed on crashed planes that in reality had been "faked" and were lying a quarter of a mile above two of those alleged 150 kTon devices, after a "missile" with a "nuclear" warhead was fired into the Pentagon and, conveniently for this 'theory', did not detonate even though the missile smashed through the Pentagon facade and hence according to Duff and Khalezov "explains" why there is no evidence of their claim of a nuclear cruise missile at the Pentagon, and an aging former top Mossad agent "confessed" to having masterminded 9/11 to a Russian Gentile whom he employed as an interpreter.

Or a Russian Jew, as the case may be. The variant Khalizov is a Jewish surname that appears in records "without the city of Minsk", and it's in category D in the Consolidated Jewish Surname database.

Here's an example of how Khalezov distorts the facts to suit his agenda of "poisoning the well" and sabotaging the truth movement for the benefit of the 9/11 perpetrators. Khalezov claims:

The picture below shows an example of that fine microscopic dust that covered all over Manhattan after the WTC demolition. Many people mistakenly believed that it was allegedly "concrete dust". No, it was not. It was "complete" dust - mainly pulverized steel. Despite common misconception, the WTC structures did not contain much concrete. Concrete was used only in some limited quantities to make very thin floors slabs in the Twin Towers construction. It was not used anywhere else. The major part of the WTC Twin Towers was steel, not concrete. So this finest dust was in its major part represented by steel dust accordingly. Though, it was not only "steel dust" alone - it was also a "furniture dust", "wood dust", "paper dust", "carpet dust", "computer parts dust" and even "human dust", since remaining in the Towers human beings were pulverized in the same manner as steel, concrete and furniture.
However, contrary to Khalezov's version of events, each Tower contained more concrete than steel. There was nearly 100,000 tons of steel per Tower. Some reports quote "425,000 cubic yards of concrete" used in the WTC construction, which would be up to 338,094 tons per Tower. That figure is clearly too high, but a more reasonable estimate places it at more than 120,000 tons. And given that the approximately 1,887 kg/m^3 density for the mix of lightweight and normal-weight concrete is less than one-quarter that of the 7,860 kg/m^3 for steel, the volume of concrete was certainly more than five times the volume of steel. See here for calculations and further information.

Steel inventory, tons per Tower

27,900 Exterior columns and spandrels, 9th to 107th floor
12,950 Rolled columns and beams above 9th floor, in cores;
also exterior wall steel above 107th floor
3,400 Perimeter bifurcation columns (trees) 4th to 9th floor
6,800 Perimeter box cols. below the bifurcation cols. to 4th floor
6,500 Core box columns below the 9th floor
15,550 Core box columns above 9th floor and built-up beams
6,000 Support for slabs below grade
3,023 Steel decking
4,949 Grillages
11,261 Floor trusses
------
98,333 TOTAL



Concrete inventory, tons per Tower

68,159 Regular office floors, 91 off at 749 tons (average)
42,874 Heavy floors, 26 off at 1649 tons (average)
7,166 Core foundations
4,181 Perimeter foundations
-------
122,380 TOTAL
 

Each of the regular office floors had about 750 tons of concrete: the core was 5-inch normal-weight and the remainder was 4-inch lightweight concrete. The mechanical floors had 5.75-inch normal-weight throughout, and the heavy floors 43 and 77 had 8-inch normal-weight within the core and 7.75-inch normal-weight elsewhere. So these slabs were not "very thin", and the concrete was not used only in "limited quantities" as Khalezov suggests. The dust was mostly comprised of concrete, although there was of course the unreacted thermitic material in the form of red-gray chips, and the iron spherules which were the product of energetic materials used in the demolitions.

Conclusion
If Gordon Duff and Dimitri Khalezov were really so silly as to believe their claims about nuclear "demolition devices" having been installed beneath the Towers in the early Seventies with government approval, based on some "intelligence" that Khalezov had allegedly received - e.g. from an FBI agent, they would be demonstrating such an incredible gullibility, misunderstanding of politics and lack of common sense, etc., that this is not a realistic possibility. It is pretty obvious that the politicians who purported to have been fooled by "intelligence" about Iraq's so-called WMDs were almost all, if not indeed all, lying, yet Iraqi WMDs was nowhere near as crazy an idea as that of pre-installed nuclear "demolition devices" for high-rise buildings. Since the "nukes installed under the WTC in the early Seventies" claim is so preposterous it may be dismissed out of hand by anyone who is not stark, staring bonkers, Khalezov must have lied when he claimed to have become aware of the alleged 150 kTon devices from his "former service under the Soviet Special Control Service." It is also clear that, not only should the 'work' of Duff and Khalezov be shunned by genuine investigators of 9/11, but anyone foolish enough to recommend them is, at best, so lacking in judgment that their opinions on any other matter are rendered worthless, and at worst, a partner in deception and cover up.

The disinformation agents have really gone overboard with these claims about pre-installed nukes at the WTC, which reflect their increasing desperation. The idea that nineteen drinking, cocaine snorting, gambling, womanizing, "devout" Muslims with box cutters who could not even fly a Cessna would have the ability or the inclination to hijack four planes, turn off the transponders, crash one of them into the Pentagon at 530 mph with the engines two feet clear of the lawn, and that three steel-framed high-rises would totally collapse from "office fires", leaving tons of molten iron in the debris and iron spherules and unreacted thermitic material in the dust, a mere six weeks after two Jewish billionaires, who happened to be friends of four prime ministers of a certain country sitting on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea with a history of staging false-flag terrorism and a known "capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act", should happen to have taken over the lease for those high-rises and insured the buildings against terror attacks with a clause releasing them from their obligations under the terms of the 99-year lease in the event of terror attacks, after only two of the buildings were hit by a plane, is too absurd for anyone above the level of borderline retard to accept once they become aware of the facts. Hence, the disinformation shills are forced to resort to even more preposterous nonsense such as "holographic planes" and "nuclear demolition devices", in order to make it seem as if the only alternative to the "box cutters" lunacy is the "faked planes" or the "nukes under the WTC" insanity, as a distraction from the simple truth: that the political leadership of Western 'democracies' is sponsored by and in thrall to Jewish plutocrats, who orchestrate global events to suit their agenda of establishing a New World Order - namely, their age-old dream of a "Jewish Utopia", with their control of the mainstream media and their puppet 'leaders' a prerequisite for the 9/11 cover up.

http://takeourworldback.com/wtcnukeddisinfo.htm
.
.