Did Russia just “gently” threaten the USA?

Started by MikeWB, November 12, 2015, 06:57:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MikeWB

http://thesaker.is/did-russia-just-gently-threaten-the-usa/

Did Russia just "gently" threaten the USA?

Interesting stuff today.  A major Russian TV channel just aired a report about Putin meeting with his top military commanders.  I don't have the time to translate what Putin said word for word, but basically he said that the USA had refused every single Russian offer to negotiate about the US anti-missile system in Europe and that while the US had initially promised that the real target of this system was Iran, now that the Iranian nuclear issue had been solved, the US was still deploying the system.  Putin added that the US was clearly attempting to change the world's military balance.  And then the Russian footage showed this:



According to the Kremlin was mistakenly leaked secret document.  And just to make sure that everybody got it, RT wrote a full article in English about this in an article entitled "'Assured unacceptable damage': Russian TV accidentally leaks secret 'nuclear torpedo' design". According to RT

The presentation slide titled "Ocean Multipurpose System: Status-6" showed some drawings of a new nuclear submarine weapons system. It is apparently designed to bypass NATO radars and any existing missile defense systems, while also causing heavy damage to "important economic facilities" along the enemy's coastal regions. The footnote to the slide stated that Status-6 is intended to cause "assured unacceptable damage" to an adversary force. Its detonation "in the area of the enemy coast" would result in "extensive zones of radioactive contamination" that would ensure that the region would not be used for "military, economic, business or other activity" for a "long time." According to the blurred information provided in the slide, the system represents a massive torpedo, designated as "self-propelled underwater vehicle," with a range of up to 10 thousand kilometers and capable of operating at a depth of up to 1,000 meters.

Actually, such ideas are nothing new.  The late Andrei Sakharov had already proposed a similar idea to basically wipe out the entire US East Coast.  The Russians have also look into the possibility to detonate a nuclear device to set off the "Yellowstone Caldera" and basically destroy most of the USA in one shot.  While in the early years following WWII the Soviets did look into all sort of schemes to threaten the USA with destruction, the subsequent development of Soviet nuclear capabilities made the development of this type of "doomsday weapons" useless.  Personally, I don't believe for one second that the Russians are now serious about developing such system as it would be literally a waste of resources.  So what is going on here?

This so-called "leak" of "secret documents" is, of course, no leak at all.  This is a completely deliberate action.  To imagine that a Russian journalist could, just by mistake, film a secret document (helpfully held up for him by a general) and then just walk away, get it passed his editor and air it is laughable.  Any footage taken in a meeting of the President with his senior generals would be checked many times over.  No, this was a deliberate way to remind the USA that if they really are hell-bent on spending billions of dollars in a futile quest to create some kind of anti-missile system Russia could easily develop a cheap weapon system to still threaten the USA with total annihilation.  Because, make no mistake, the kind of long range torpedo being suggested here would be rather cheap to build using only already existing technologies.  I would even add that rather than setting such a weapon off the US coast the system could also be designed to fire off a secondary missile (ballistic or cruise) which could then fly to any inland target.  Again, such technologies already exist in the Russian military and have even been deployed on a smaller scale. See for yourself:




Coming back to the real world, I don't believe for one second that any type of anti-missile system could be deployed in Europe to shield NATO the EU or the US from a Russian retaliatory strike should the Empire ever decide to attack Russia.  All the East Europeans are doing is painting a cross-hair on themselves as these will be the very first targets to be destroyed in case of a crisis.  How? By use of special forces first and, if needed, by Iskander missile strikes if all else fails.  But the most likely scenario is that key components of the anti-missile system will suddenly experience "inexplicable failures" which will render the entire system useless.  The Russians know that and so do the Americans.  But just to make sure that everybody got the message the Russians have now shown that even a fully functional and survivable US anti-missile system will not protect anybody from a Russian retaliation.

The sad thing is that US analysts all fully understand that but they have no say in a fantastically corrupt Pentagon.  The real purpose of the US program is not to protect anybody against a non-existing Russian threat, but to dole out billions of dollars to US corporations and their shareholders.  And if in the process the US destabilizes the entire planet and threatens the Russians – then "to hell with 'em Russikes!  We are the indispensable nation and f**k the rest of the planet!"  Right?

Wrong.

What happened today is a gentle reminder of that.
1) No link? Select some text from the story, right click and search for it.
2) Link to TiU threads. Bring traffic here.

yankeedoodle

Certainly seems so.  RT actually reported it themselves yesterday, complete with photo, so it definitely wouldn't be missed. 

'Assured unacceptable damage': Russian TV accidentally leaks secret 'nuclear torpedo' design
https://www.rt.com/news/321640-leaked-russian-nuclear-torpedo/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

Michael K.

US gently reminds world that it has fully fuctional sub-launched nuclear missiles, no coincidences here, I should think.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-war-drums-are-beating-two-trident-missiles-launched-over-los-angeles-act-of-provocation-directed-against-russia-and-china/5488061

QuoteThe War Drums are Beating: Two Trident Missiles Launched over Los Angeles. Act of Provocation Directed against Russia and China?

By Joachim Hagopian
Global Research, November 11, 2015

Without warning just after sunset last Saturday night the US Navy purposely picked a time to launch an unarmed Trident II missile from the submarine the USS Kentucky from waters off the Southern California coast so hundreds of thousands of witnesses would be sure to observe the brightly lit up sky and headlines would certainly spread around the world.

The unusual event was seen as far away as northern California, Arizona and Nevada. It triggered a firestorm of conjecture that included possible UFO's to World War III. Beginning last Friday evening the FAA suddenly declared that the US Navy created a no fly zone shutting down LA airport flights from flying west over the ocean from America's second busiest airport until Thursday this week due to unspecified military activity. The Navy then fired a second unarmed Trident missile on Monday during daytime hours claiming it would have also been launched on Saturday night along with the first one but there "too many private boats in the area" prohibited it. Strange that too many boats didn't stop the first launch, the one "seen" around the world. Chalk it up to military logic.


MikeWB

This saber rattling is starting to make me nervous. Nuϲⅼеаr war scares the crap out of me. I wish these two countries would just tone down their rhetoric and quit fucking with each other in this way. There will be no winners if this thing escalates.

Everything seemed to be fine before US jews started revolutions on Russia's doorstep. After that, all hell has broken loose.

This shit needs to end. It will lead to our total destruction.
1) No link? Select some text from the story, right click and search for it.
2) Link to TiU threads. Bring traffic here.