Re: Pedophile Jewish Rabbis Suck Dick

[Anonymous]

Nice find, thank you nonesuch.  I like how the author ties in Jewish control of masonry as well These are my favorite segments, as they are very telling about who these criminals are and how these evil Jews are of the satanic occultism:

Most "Jews" instinctively hate their own "religion", which is a Satanic branch of Babylonean Talmudism and Cabalistic witchcraft, with no link to the Biblical Old Testament Scriptures.

Oh yeah, Jewish rabbis murdered Jewish rabbi Jesus Christ Yahweh, and his disciples, for daring to expose the fraud that is Babylonean Talmudic witchcraft, that has replaced the original Jewish religion. Modern Jews don't even speak ancient Hebrew, but have replaced it with modern Yiddish.

Masonry is basically Jewish infiltration of the Christian church, to make Jewish banking/loansharking/extortion rackets "acceptable" by the gullible Goyim, in violation of Christian law.

The wealthiest members of my family are in the "Masonic Mafia" (Jewish banking/insurance/judicial rackets).

[kolnidre]

It does remind us too how their evil, destructive, backwards and malign influence and ritualistic practices effect us even from the moment of our very birth

Sign of the beast?

At the very least, it's a mark that says to them, like it or not, you're one of us. The "medical" practice, like the name changes, is just camouflage to allow them to blend into the general population. Instead of going crypto, they judaized most of the English-speaking world. Interestingly, the spread of this twisted ritual (no passes for others slicing and dicing genitals) via the medical system they dominate corresponded with the criminalization of identifying a Jew in the Soviet Union.

Two of the most vocal proponents of the continued butchery are named Wiswell and Schoen. For medical reasons, of course.

[MikeWB]

Ugh... you guys consider this  a good article??!? It's full of shit & nonsense. I didn't read the whole thing but I noticed a few canards.

General Albert Pike, the Masonic Pope, was a genocidal Jew who was convicted of treason during the US Civil War..

WTF?! He was definitely not a jew. If you read his books, and I have, he despises them. Now, he was an occultists, that's for sure.

"The New Testament is a lying, hateful, harmful book, ultimately responsible for the deaths of six million Jews in World War II."

[MikeWB]

&C, it has ZERO credibility with all these mistakes in it. ZERO!

Let's try to keep it to what we can actually prove. This forum is not a hate forum that posts all kinds of nonsense just to incite violence. There's plenty of stuff to talk about but when we start posting this kind of crap, the whole forum loses credibility.

Instead of looking at these sites that post all kinds of fake quotes, look into the Talmud instead. It's still up on ConCen tracker. Why trust all these people who manufacture crap for all kinds of reasons that we can't even fathom?! Just look it up. It's that simple. Zionists have been writing these fake quotes themselves just to claim that they're being prosecuted and so that when someone writes something against them and uses this quote, they can shoot it down in a second... despite the fact that the rest of the stuff might have some truth to it. This is why they also write swastikas on their own homes and then claim that 'anti-semitic neighbors did it'.

As for Hitler being Jewish.. what does that have to do with Pike?! This article is interesting, however: http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a3_325b.html

But even if his father was part Jewish, you're only Jewish if your mother's Jewish. Only maternal side matters and father can be of any religion/ethnicity. SO, if mother is jewish and father is anything, child is jewish.

[Anonymous]

I see the validity of your points Mike in saying it is isn't good to use sources of info that might have false statements or lies in them.  I still value the information in the article.  And I also see the value in people posting stuff that may or may not be accurate.  Are we not supposed to help each other out to learn from each other and determine what is accurate and what is not?  If everyone refrained from posting something if they didn't go in depth and look into every issue that was brought up by the piece they wanted to post, I don't think the forum would have many posts at all, and the information repository would not grow.  It is important to validate things, but we don't need to be so contradictory to those who post information that we might not think is valid.  It would help a lot if authors would cite the sources, but that is often not done.  So let's prove the dissinfo to be dissinfo.

WTF?! He was definitely not a jew. If you read his books, and I have, he despises them. Now, he was an occultists, that's for sure.

Marx was a Jew, yet he was not favorable to his fellow brethren.  If Pike wasn't a Jew, then ok its a false statement to say he was.  It requires more research definitely.  But that's why we are on a forum, to help each other out, to gather more info.  AT least that's what I understood the purpose of an informational forum to be.  If its wrong, well lets prove it wrong, but we shouldn't stop from posting something just because it has some people will see some parts as having questionable information.

But even if his father was part Jewish, you're only Jewish if your mother's Jewish. Only maternal side matters and father can be of any religion/ethnicity. SO, if mother is jewish and father is anything, child is jewish.

I don't give a hoot about the Jewish law about ancestry.  If your father is black and your mother white, then you are half black and half white, the same goes with Jews.  Frack them and their deceitful law of obfuscating their true lineage. It doesn't fly by me, sorry.

I don't hold to the zero credibility as is held in court cases when one thing is proven to be wrong.  To me that is a very flawed logical reasoning the courts use, that most people adhere to.  If something is wrong, for me it does not invalidate the rest of the information.  But for the majority of people this would play out like you say, the whole of the info would be invalidated.  If something is true, well its true regardless if other info is false for me.

I post stuff I find interesting (right or wrong I post it because I find it has meaningful statements).  If I post something about Jews being Khazars, we might all agree on its validity.  But if I were to post that info somewhere else I would be accused of being a hater and spreading lies because its not a credible fact according to them who don't know it has validity.  I don't see where the hate is that would incite violence in this article... nor that the forum would lose credibility.  I think I need a lesson on what is permissible and what is not permissible to post here at TIU as it is confusing for me at this point to understand how things are supposed to work.  Maybe we need to update the rules section?  Let me know...

Peace.

[Hei Hu Quan]

Take it easy &C, lets keep things civil. Mike has a point I too share in that I'd rather you took the reigns and investigated this information's validity and put out a paper yourself on it. The reason? Keep in mind that we're looking to unite sincere people of all walks of life and if we put out reactionary and inflammatory evidence that is suspect, it makes us all look like dodgy chumps. We must all use due diligence in sorting out good, strong evidence, and if the source is specious or shite then take sort the good clues in the article and run down the research yourself. We'll get much better results and better evidence to build strong, clean cases, and that is what we are building our reputation and name from.

Cheers and respect.

[Anonymous]

The statement about Shabbath 116a of the Talmud, this is discussed here.  The person who distills the interpretations that the reference is to the NT gospels is admittedly a pro-Israel apparent Zionist.  I for one do not consider his appraisal of the Shabbath 116a note 15 to be accurate, as he is obviously biased towards defending Judaism.  He labels his religion as "B'nai Noach", LOL.  Lee obviously interpreted the word "gospels" to mean NT, maybe others will disagree on the finer points of what is and what is not the NT gospels.

For Pike, he had Jewish influences, specifically the Cabbala: http://www.themasonictrowel.com/Article ... mystic.htm

The Albert Pike Memorial (Masonic) Temple was also located right beside the Jewish Synagogue in San Francisco prior to 1906 (maybe it still is... I dont know).  Just an interesting thing to note, since there are ties between Masonry and Jewish people and groups, such as the B'nai B'rith.

Here is info on Pike, masonry, and Jewish personalities.

Many people use the Mazzini/Pike letter about a three world wars prediction, it is questionable and is most likely a hoax as http://www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-maso ... zzini.html purports, since some of the info sounds like it was written after WWI.  But the site also contends the Protocols to be pure garbage http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/ ... nry06.html.  And they also seem to deny any justification for masons to be involved in an evil conspiracy.  I do NOT trust them as a source of valid information on all issues.  If I see the Pike/Mazzini debunk link as valid yet not the Protocols debunk link or other attempted debunks, does that make me a purveyor of bullshit because it undermines the credibility of TIU when I use a source of info that has what can be seen to have incorrect statements?  Yet TIU would surely permit the Protocols to be talked about and discussed despite its questionable validity, why not this article by Lee?  Where is the inciting hate to be found in this article that some claim is there?

The quote by Foxman is fake as he never said those EXACT words, but his book does imply that Christian teachings are related to Hitlers death camps.
http://www.texemarrs.com/012007/what_foxman_said.htm
http://lakejacksonnews.blogspot.com/200 ... tians.html
http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot ... mitic.html
So yes Mike it does hurt the credibility when using such quotes when thinking in the court-like view of discrediting information by proving one thing to be false or a lie, maybe Lee made a retraction later on to admit the quote was false, I don't know.  But as I have said, for me, just because one thing is wrong it does not invalidate the rest, and it does not make the article bullshit.

Also, if I were to bring up an article about the Holohoax, that could be seen to undermine the credibility of TIU, but that would be permitted despite its questionable validity among some people.  If I hold something as valid, and you don't, well then let's get to the bottom of what is accurate, we don't need to be aggressive towards each other, right?  I think more effort needs to be used when attempted to invalidate an entire article or some point therein.  Not to pick on you Mike (hehehe), but you didn't look deep enough.  The false quote by Foxman returned I think about 15 results in google (I think 5 were related to the Nonesuch WUFYS post and piratenews) and the Talmud tractate exists in the Soncino translations that I hold to be more valid than the in-line-with-establishment permissible Michael L. Rodkinson (Jewish) or Jacob Neusner (Jewish) (<-the version you have from CC)versions:
"SHABBATH
TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH
WITH NOTES, GLOSSARY
AND INDICES

CHAPTERS I - IV
BY
RABBI DR. H. FREEDMAN, B.A., Ph.D.

UNDER THE EDITORSHIP OF
RABBI DR I. EPSTEIN

B.A., Ph.D., D. Lit."
http://www.come-and-hear.com/shabbath/index.html

See here for previous refutations about the Talmud you made Mike http://infounderground.18.forumer.com/i ... wtopic=634.  I see where you are coming from though, trying to keep the integrity of TIU up, and thats commendable .  I still hold the comenadhear Talmud translations and the Lee article as valid material for TIU.  We each have out own opinions of things, so lets discuss them without the semi-hostility  We could each try to validate or invalidate our respective version of the Talmud translations... but I don't want to do that, as I didn't really want to write this post up, but felt it was needed given the conflict that has resulted.

Keep posting material you deem important Nonesuch, I for one appreciate it.  If it sounds right for you, but someone else might not see it as being right, well lets discuss these things.  And if it is determined to be harmful to TIU, well we can delete the post  If any admin thinks I am wrong about this, please let me know, I am just going with how I perceive a proper progression of information should be handled.  We need people to post and not be afraid that an admin or outsider will deem it to be shite and not worthy resulting in loss of credibility for TIU.  Thanks to Nonesuch and Mike for their valuable contributions here, I am not trying to pick sides based on personally favored relations with either individual, just going with my perception of the information.

Peace.

[Hei Hu Quan]

Spot-on sort AZiXx thanks for your clarification and harmonious insight. I hope this puts things back on course.

Cheers and respect to all.

[sullivan]

Whatever about the merits or demerits of this article, I would respectfully like to caution against using deliberately offensive titles such as 'Pedophile Jewish Rabbis Suck Dick'.  Never mind that 'Jewish Rabbis' is a tautology, as I don't recall any other kind of Rabbi!

While I am not impartial to swearing, and admittedly sometimes profusely, I perceive the use of such expressions designed to shock or repel as being a particularly Jewish trait.

When presenting our case to the general public (which I realise is not the case in this forum, but is the case on Wake Up From Your Slumber), we need to be above reproach. It is essential that we present our information in a logical and reasoned manner. Righteous anger is fine, but being deliberately offensive is not, in my opinion.

Just my 2 cents (