Top vet calls for reform of kosher and halal slaughter practices

Started by Ognir, February 03, 2017, 09:13:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ognir

President-elect of the British Veterinary Association says more emphasis on animal welfare is needed

There is an exemption for religious groups allowing them to slaughter animals in accordance with their religious beliefs. Photograph: Frank Baron for the Guardian
View more sharing options
Shares
3,690
Kevin Rawlinson
Thursday 6 March 2014 01.04 GMT
A total ban on killing animals without stunning them first might not be far off if religious groups cannot agree a more humane way of slaughter soon, a top vet has said.

The president-elect of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) John Blackwell said he wanted to discuss the issue with Jewish and Muslim groups in order to find a compromise that puts more emphasis on the welfare of the animal.

"I don't think an outright ban is a long way off, there is enough of a view that this practice is inhumane and causes suffering at the time of death," said Blackwell.


The stories you need to read, in one handy email
Read more
His comments are likely to cause anger among religious groups whose teachings recommend or require the slaughter of animals without stunning them first – including Jews and Muslims.

Blackwell said the BVA had not strayed into religious discussions while campaigning for the changes in the past, but that he was happy to talk to religious groups.

"We have tried to keep it out of the religious sphere. It is not an attack on religious faith, it is a view that we have taken on animal welfare," Blackwell said.

He said that there was currently an exemption for religious groups that allowed them to slaughter animals that makes their meat halal or kosher in accordance with their religious beliefs.

But he said that the debate should be "moved forward so that the animals are stunned" before being killed. And he said that the BVA would like a "collective meeting of minds [with religious groups] to review the science".

He acknowledged that there were likely to be "sensitivities surrounding the issue", but said that the debate was preferable to relying on "beliefs handed down hundreds of years ago, that may have been true at the time".

Blackwell also raised the prospect of labelling on food products to make it clearer the methods that were used in the slaughter of the animals. He said that doing so would give consumers a better, more informed choice.

The chief rabbi and the Muslim Council of Britain did not respond to requests for comment.

Since you're here...
...we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but far fewer are paying for it. And advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/06/reform-of-kosher-and-halal-slaughter-practices?CMP=share_btn_tw

Most zionists don't believe that God exists, but they do believe he promised them Palestine

- Ilan Pappe

Ognir

This is very interesting.

Kill 2 birds with 1 stone

Where are all these animal rights activists on this poor animals being slaughtered in this inhumane method <lol>
Most zionists don't believe that God exists, but they do believe he promised them Palestine

- Ilan Pappe