Destroying Bill O’Reilly

[rmstock]

Destroying Bill O'Reilly
By My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. (Reporter) ,  Friday, April 21, 2017 5:17
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2017/04/destroying-bill-oreilly-3271904.html
  "(Before It's News)

   For quite some time, I've watched The Factor at 7 pm or later at 10pm.
   I always found the segments interesting, stimulating and often funny,
   such as Miller's weekly contribution.

   We learned that Fox said "No mas" and O'Reilly is off the air. Put me
   down as one of those 4 million who isn't happy.     

   Let me be clear that I don't support sexual harassment or the
   mistreatment of anyone in the work environment.   

   I do see a lot of selective indignation, specially when the allegations
   came from an article in the New York Times. Isn't this the same paper
   that endorsed Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and loves Ted Kennedy?

   Is Roger Simon right that this is really about Trump? I think that
   Roger is on to something here:   

      The real target in the defenestration of Bill was not O'Reilly himself
      but very obviously Donald Trump.  He's the Big Kahuna the obscenely
      named "Resistance" (hey, you idiots, that was about Auschwitz, not tax
      reform) is after and Bill was only a stop along the way.

      Indeed, several of Bill's accusers, represented by the daughter of
      Gloria Allred, appear to be people who find Trump particularly
      loathsome.

      And the original story was broken by the New York Times, the literary
      capital of the "Resistance."

   And how all of the advertisers were put together to unite against
   O'Reilly? It's all too cute and organized for me!   

   By the way, does anyone at Mercedes Benz, one of the advertisers that
   pulled out, really think that people will buy more of their cars now
   because they pulled their ads? Are they checking on the moral character
   of all of the other places where they advertise?

   In a perfect world, men would treat women with respect, ladies would
   not seek professional or economic sugar daddies, MSNBC would do
   segments on the women who accused Bill Clinton, the feminists would
   refuse to support Hillary Clinton because she enabled her husband's
   misconduct and "the flakes" in Harvard would call for the removal of
   everything Kennedy from the college because of allegations about their
   past.   

   Of course, we don't live in a perfect world.   We live in one where the
   left is out to destroy anyone who they disagree with. In other words,
   this is not about sexual harassment but rather Fox News. I hope that
   Mr. Murdoch's sons have figured that out! It won't be long before
   another effort is made to bring down Sean Hannity or Tucker Carlson
   because they promote "hate" or challenge guests on global warming.

   P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

   Tags: O'Reilly and Fox News  To share or post to your site, click on
   "Post Link". Please mention / link to the My View by Silvio Canto, Jr. Thanks!

   SILVIO CANTO JR
   
   "



ROGER L. SIMON
Is O'Reilly's Firing Really About Trump?
BY ROGER L SIMON APRIL 19, 2017  CHAT 355 COMMENTS
https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2017/04/19/is-oreillys-firing-really-about-trump/

  "Rupert Murdoch should sue his sons.
   
   James and Lachlan seem intent on destroying Fox News or at least
   reforming it drastically, which in the final analysis comes to the same
   thing.
   
   The sons think they're the new hip thing, but they're the opposite. 
   They're terminally square.  And not just because Fox was the only
   big-time conservative game in town and therefore could lap CNN and
   MSNBC, as the network has done for years, but because liberalism isn't
   nearly as cool as the boys think it is.  It's actually stodgy and
   vastly more old-fashioned than conservatism and certainly
   libertarianism.
   
   (I know that's hard to comprehend for some -- it's so contrary to
   conventional wisdom -- but think about it for two seconds.)
   
   Nevertheless, if I were Sean Hannity, I'd be watching my back.  Bill
   O'Reilly -- whatever his behavior -- may only have been the first to go.
   
   The real target in the defenestration of Bill was not O'Reilly himself
   but very obviously Donald Trump.  He's the Big Kahuna the obscenely
   named "Resistance" (hey, you idiots, that was about Auschwitz, not tax
   reform) is after and Bill was only a stop along the way.  Indeed,
   several of Bill's accusers, represented by the  daughter of Gloria
   Allred, appear to be people who find Trump particularly loathsome. And
   the original story was broken by the New York Times, the literary
   capital of the "Resistance."
     
   The timing of the attacks on O'Reilly -- who everyone knew for years
   was not a saint, sort of like Bill Clinton and half the stars in
   Hollywood we hear pontificating on a daily basis -- is also far from
   coincidental.  O'Reilly, although he pretended to even-handedness (no
   journalist is), was one of Trump's most staunch defenders in the media,
   arguably his most powerful one. For the "Resistance," he had to go.
   
   If I were Fox talent right now, I'd be very nervous and especially
   careful about saying anything too positive about Trump.  I'd remember
   to add a few negatives, maybe more than a few, to undercut any
   approving statements about the president or his policies, just like
   they do it on CNN.  The Murdoch boys will be watching.  Like characters
   in a Greek tragedy, the brothers have taken over and are maneuvering
   their aged father off stage. And Fox News is the big loser in this
   drama.
   
   A possible winner, however, is Newsmax, the only other serious
   conservative television network on cable. Despite having some good
   shows and interesting guests (including yours truly, so I should recuse
   myself, but I won't), they haven't made much of an impact so far, in
   part because they have a degraded video feed that looks amateurish.
   
   Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy has been dickering back and forth with the
   cable companies for years now about getting a full high-def feed.  It
   would seem this would be the time to get the money together and take
   the plunge.  He might even draft a certain Bill O'Reilly as his lead
   commentator.
   
   Which leads me back to O'Reilly.  Watching The (No O'Reilly) Factor on
   Wednesday night, hosted by Dana Perino, was an extremely odd, almost
   disembodied experience. Perino, an intelligent and attractive woman,
   appeared to be straining and barely mentioned O'Reilly until the end.
   Then all she said were no more than encomiums that sounded as if they
   were written by lawyers. Undoubtedly, they were. She gave absolutely no
   details on why O'Reilly was no longer there, even though much of
   America had been discussing the rumors for days. Evidently the Murdochs
   didn't want her to say anything.  So Bill went to Italy, met the pope,
   and never came back. Actually Perino didn't even say the much. The
   elephant in the room not only remained the elephant in the room -- it
   multiplied.
   
   Did what Bill supposedly did really amount to a firing offense or were
   his accusers just looking for money or fame, as O'Reilly himself has
   implied?  Or was it just a political hatchet job by the seemingly
   endless legions who spend all their waking hours and seemingly most of
   their sleeping ones doing their best to oppose, discredit, and destroy
   all things Trump?
   
   5 Things You Need to Know About Fox News Cutting Bill O'Reilly
   
   Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Academy Award-nominated
   screenwriter and co-founder of PJ Media.  His latest book is I Know
   Best:  How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If  It Hasn't
   Already. Follow him on Twitter @rogerlsimon. "

Both O'Reilly and Hannity have praised Julian Assange for his work to expose the Clinton Democrats
and its key part within the Deep State.  The CIA however has started a deadly campaign against
Assange :

CIA chief knocks Assange, but deems Wikileaks 'intelligence agency'
by RT America , Published on Apr 13, 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnL7c13w4_A
  "CIA Director Mike Pompeo tore into Julian Assange, the founder of
   whistleblowing website Wikileaks, while simultaneously calling the
   project aimed at government transparency one of a few "non-state
   intelligence agencies." Without specifying what other agencies the
   director was referring to, Pompeo made it clear that he regards Assange
   as dangerous to the US as any other terrorist organization. "

[Christopher Marlowe]

[rmstock]

There's something very off with Fox. Of recent the President had
advised his twitter followers that for decent news coverage , not fake
news, people should watch Fox News [1]:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/845646761704243200
Then we had the strange copyright
claims of Fox on youtube, which started a couple of days before the US
Navy attack on that Syrian airfield [2][3][4]. And now there's even signs by none
less than Nostradamus himself, who has prophesied something like this
to happen for this year, 2017 :


Picture: HULTON ARCHIVE/GETTY IMAGES)
Here's what Nostradamus predicted about 2017
Posted 2 months ago by Jessica Brown in news
https://www.indy100.com/article/nostradamus-predictions-2017-astrology-7509551
  "[ ... ]
   6. A weird version of Animal Farm

   `` A fox will be elected without speaking one word,

      appearing saintly in public living on barley bread,

      afterwards he will suddenly become a tyrant

      putting his foot on the throats of the greatest men. ''
   [ ... ]"

[Astrangerinmyownland]

O'Reilly is the kind of guy that never extended a hand to real Conservatives, so it's hard to give much of a Fuck about what his fate is.  He was solid on Black crime, but that's about it.  He's such an asshole and a bully on-air that it's hard for me to care about him.  He was a Careerist, nothing more.  I have far more respect for Alex Jones.

He was, allegedly, a serial sexual predator.  We're talking like just below Bill Clinton level.  More of a perv or a creek than a rapist, though.

[rmstock]

O'Reilly is the kind of guy that never extended a hand to real Conservatives, so it's hard to give much of a Fuck about what his fate is.  He was solid on Black crime, but that's about it.  He's such an asshole and a bully on-air that it's hard for me to care about him.  He was a Careerist, nothing more.  I have far more respect for Alex Jones.

He was, allegedly, a serial sexual predator.  We're talking like just below Bill Clinton level.  More of a perv or a creek than a rapist, though.

Depends ... he sure did a nice job on the Tarmac meet and greet of
Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton , which, if it would not have been on
the O'Reilly Factor, would never have made it on the CNN nightmare
talking-points memo list :

Loretta Lynch meets with Bill Clinton amid email scandal
by rmstock , Published on Jul 1, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPrGgnQyEB0
  "Loretta Lynch meets with Bill Clinton amid email scandal
   Jun. 30, 2016 - 6:50 - 'The O'Reilly Factor' investigates the
   controversial discussion
   http://video.foxnews.com/v/5014668891... "

[Astrangerinmyownland]

Yeah but that's basic bitch shit.  That's not pushing the envelope.