Jordan Peterson and the disagreeable jew(ess)

[yankeedoodle]

Jordan Peterson gets this obnoxious jew(ess) to say "I'm not very agreeable" at 16:30.   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=431&v=aMcjxSThD54

Very interesting analysis in this article:
Why Can't People Hear What Jordan Peterson Is Saying?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/putting-monsterpaint-onjordan-peterson/550859/?utm_source=feed

My first introduction to Jordan B. Peterson, a University of Toronto clinical psychologist, came by way of an interview that began trending on social media last week. Peterson was pressed by the British journalist Cathy Newman to explain several of his controversial views. But what struck me, far more than any position he took, was the method his interviewer employed. It was the most prominent, striking example I've seen yet of an unfortunate trend in modern communication.

First, a person says something. Then, another person restates what they purportedly said so as to make it seem as if their view is as offensive, hostile, or absurd.       

[yankeedoodle]

Peter Hitchens sparks row over Jordan Peterson 'cult'
https://www.rt.com/uk/417064-jordan-peterson-trans-pc/

Clinical psychologist and lecturer Peterson was relatively unknown until his campaign against political correctness at his workplace, the University of Toronto, hit the headlines.

The professor uploaded videos in which he said he would not accept the Canadian government's Bill C-16, which proposed including gender identity and orientation in the Canadian Human Rights Act, thus making it illegal to discriminate based on outward expression of gender.

Peterson said he would not accept new terms like "ze" instead of he or she. With 150 million views on his videos and over 300,000 Twitter followers, the academic [describes] his thinking as "classic British liberal."

[...]

Peterson has shot to fame in the UK thanks to a television interview with Channel 4 News' Cathy Newman. In what has quickly become an infamous moment, the journalist was left speechless after clashing with Peterson for some 30 minutes, during which the psychologist disputed supposed myths around the gender pay gap, and challenged Newman's beliefs on equality.

[yankeedoodle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi2apSOhvC4

Jordan Peterson address the JQ
http://irishsavant.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/jordan-peterson-address-jq.html

Well actually no, he does not address it. Rather he adroitly skirts around it. He does this by adducing the time-tested trope of high Jewish intelligence as the explanation for their disproportionate representation among the wealthy and powerful. But while high IQ is indeed scientifically linked to successful life outcomes it goes nowhere close to explaining the prevailing Jewish stranglehold on our societies. You'll understand why if we focus on absolute numbers rather than ratios. So let's accept that Ashkenazi Jews have IQ levels that average 115 and be generous by assuming this to be double the White ratio. However, assuming Jews to be 2% (taking American population figures here, the Jewish ratio is lower in most other countries ) and Whites 70% means that Whites outnumber Jews by 35:1 among the super intelligent. Using JP's logic there then should be 35 times more Whites than Jews in the Senate, the Supreme Court, among university professors, bank Presidents, owners of MSM outlets and Hollywood moguls.

See what I mean? It fails lamentably as an explanation.

His evasiveness on this subject has predictably resulted in a torrent of abuse from from the right-wing/WN blogosphere. But I call for forbearance. First, what would you do in his place? He's rich, famous, successful with a glittering career stretching into the horizon. What's more he's winning huge numbers of converts to his dearly-held views on, inter alia, feminism, Cultural Marxism and men's rights. Should he stray off the reservation on the JQ he loses all that and becomes a David Irving, even to the possibility of serving time in the slammer under Canada's Orwellian 'human rights' laws.

Now as a right wing/WN blogger myself I look at it this way. As it stands JP is doing great work for us. Huge numbers of Whites, especially White men, are being awakened to the war being waged against them. I repeat. Thanks to JP huge numbers of Whites, especially White men, are being awakened to the war being waged against them. Even though he avoids the JQ (and hey, he's one goy who knows) his material inevitably leads his White followers to dig deeper into the existential war being waged against them. That's good enough for me. Remember JP reaches a vast audience, most of whom would never go near the more explicitly Jew-wise sites. At least not before he had ignited their curiosity.

So cut him some slack. He's doing God's and in his own way he's helping us win the war.