jew-lyin' Assange to bring down Donnie-boy?

[yankeedoodle]

We know that jew-lyin' Assange is a zionist agent who participated in the installation of President/King Kushner, and his puppet, shit-for-brains shabbos goy Donnie-boy, and, it looks like jew-lyin' Assange is about to find himself in the United States, where he can explain what happened.   

Impeachment?  Who needs impeachment?  It's RESIGNATION time.   

Assange's lawyers blocked from entering Ecuadorian embassy
https://www.rt.com/news/444795-assange-lawyers-refused-entry-embassy/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

Julian Assange's lawyers have been refused entry to the Ecuadorian embassy, WikiLeaks said in a tweet. The news comes amid fears he may soon be kicked out of the embassy.

WikiLeaks said the Ecuadorian government had refused to give lawyers Aitor Martinez and Jen Robinson access to Assange this weekend. The longtime WikiLeaks editor faces a US court hearing Tuesday and needs to meet with his legal team to prepare, the whistleblowing organization said.

"The hearing is on Tuesday in the national security court complex at Alexandria, Virginia," WikiLeaks tweeted, adding it is to "remove the secrecy order on the US charges against him."

A US court document leaked in November finally revealed the US has already placed secret charges on Assange. 

Assange has recently been allowed access to visitors again after seven months of being cut off from both the outside world and the internet as a result of his political tweets.

Ecuador announced it was restoring Assange's communications in October, but this came with conditions restricting his communications and placing visitors under greater scrutiny.

Earlier this week, Ecuador's President Lenin Moreno terminated the credentials of Ecuador's London ambassador Abad Ortiz. No explanation was given for the prompt recall, and WikiLeaks contextualized it by tweeting, "All diplomats known to Assange have now been  transferred away from the embassy."

Assange has been living in the Ecuadorian embassy since he sought asylum there in June 2012. The WikiLeaks editor feared being extradited to Sweden for questioning over sexual assault allegations, where he believed he would then be sent on to the US to face charges for his role in publishing thousands of US government cables leaked by whistleblower Chelsea Manning.

[yankeedoodle]

Paul Manafort just got busted - again - for lying. 
Mueller says Manafort breached plea deal by lying
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/26/mueller-manafort-plea-deal-lying-1017278


No doubt, he's lying to try and cover up his connection to jew-lyin' Assange.
Wikileaks betting '$1mn & editor's head' against Guardian claims that Manafort met Assange
https://www.rt.com/news/444995-assange-manafort-wikileaks-guardian/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

After the Guardian released an anonymously-sourced report on Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's alleged meetings with Julian Assange, Wikileaks says it was asked for comment, but its denial was not included in the article.

The report by Guardian's Luke Harding, which is light on relevant details and based on unnamed "well-placed sources," claims that Manafort, who managed US President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and is currently in jail on related charges, met with Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange three times during Assange's ongoing exile in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

The article says it's unknown what the two supposedly discussed, but hints heavily that it was related to Russia's alleged interference in the election – namely the leak of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails. Those documents were "stolen by Russian intelligence officers," the Guardian claims.

As such, Harding writes, the meetings could be of interest to FBI Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who has been trying and failing to find definitive proof of Trump's supposed "collusion" with Russia.

Except the meetings didn't happen, Wikileaks says. The whistleblowing website is so adamant about this, it's willing to bet "a million dollars and its editor's head" on it.

Moreover, Wikileaks has posted a screenshot of what it says is Harding's request for comment it received hours before the Guardian's publication. Comment was given but not included, it says.

Over an hour after publication the Guardian article was updated to include Wikileaks' reaction. Whether Harding's anonymous sources will ultimately win against the whistleblowers' all-in bet remains to be seen.