Nazis were Zionists

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Sunday, 11 November 2007
Nazis were Zionists

Some people like to compare those they wish to kill with Hitler and the Germans under Nazism.

But one comparison truly reflects history, not emotion, and truly holds up:

The Nazis wished to declare "Germans" a distinct ethnicity - and to marshal "Germans" together into a unified political force, in an ethnically and religiously homogenized homeland. This is plain fact.

The Zionists wish to declare "Jews" a distinct ethnicity - and to marshal "Jews" together into a unified political force, in an ethnically and religiously homogenized homeland.
This too is plain fact.

Zionism did come first, however, and Nazism was partly an emulation of it and partly a "pre-emptive" response against it.

Under Zionism (or Nazism,) a state would be "redeemed" through violent purification, and new Jewish-only (or German-only) "settlements" would be created through ethnic-cleansing - in Palestine and all the way to the Tigris-Euphrates (or Poland and all the way to the Ural Mountains).

The new state would be a highly egalitarian, worker-friendly, or "socialist" democracy, but it would reject the internationalism that is normally essential to socialist doctrine: the blessings of socialism and democracy would be neatly reserved for one distinct ethnicity, in an officially ethnic-supremacist land, wherein the special ethnic rights of the favored nationality would supercede the human rights of less favored groups.

The new state would be a democratic "National Socialism."

The national socialism, which was and remains the Zionist goal, is fundamentally identical to the national socialism we know as Nazism. Zionism is Jewish national socialism, just as Nazism was German national socialism.

Both Nazism and Zionism are based on a fancifully mythic interpretation of history and nationality - one producing a "Master Race," the other producing a "Chosen People" or "Sons of the Covenant" (B'nai B'rith).

Both latched onto a simplistic, ancient religious symbol - the swastika and star of David - as if to assume from it some special authority. In both cases, the adopted symbol actually has very little to do with the ethnic group it supposedly represents, and nothing to do with the violent racial or ethnic superiority claimed by those who use it as a banner of ethnic conquest and ethnic-cleansing. (Keep in mind that the Magen David has little to do with ancient Israel and nothing to do with the Eastern Europeans who converted to Judaism several centuries ago.)

In both cases, Zionism and Nazism, the ethno-centric tribal chauvinism and racism commonly found in Eastern Europe was transferred to and adopted by otherwise-modern elements of a broader group - "the Germans" and "the Jews" - and that Eastern European racist ideology would displace what was civilized and decent in the larger groups.

The main difference is, whereas Germans adopted an Eastern European tribal ideology, in the case of Zionism, a racist Eastern European group (Ashkenazim) physically migrated, with their tribal ideology, to Palestine, a totally MYTHIC "promised land," to which they had no hereditary or cultural ties, and found success by imposing their racism on innocent, unarmed, helpless, and non-racist people.
(A few mythic references to the Holy Land and its history do NOT constitute a cultural tie.)

Both Nazi Germany and Zionist Israel would build military power, secretly violating international law by manufacturing weapons - including NUCLEAR weapons - which they were not supposed to have, and both would conduct illegal espionage to steal materials they could not otherwise obtain.

Comparing Nazi Germany to IRAQ, on the other hand, is fanciful nonsense.

Neither Saddam Hussein nor Islam espouse any philosophy of ethnic superiority or supremacy, as Zionism does quite explicitly.

If we avoid comparing the credibility of their pretexts, Iraq's invasion of Kuwait CAN be compared with Nazi Germany's taking the Sudetenland - and then it can be compared with every invasion that has ever occurred.

In fact, the current pretexts for invading Iraq give it an equivalence with 1940 Poland, rather than Germany; and the Warsaw Ghetto is quite equivalent to the post-'67 Zionist Israeli occupied parts of Palestine.

The Zionist ethnic conquest of Palestine can be closely compared with the Nazi drive for "lebensraum" in Poland, through the importation of a desired ethnicity (German or "Aryan") at the expense of the indigenous people. And Israel's invasion of Lebanon, in 1982, was primarily a campaign of extermination against Palestinian civilians and national leadership (death toll estimates range between about 19,000 and 30,000), much like the extermination campaigns run by the Nazis in conquered European states.

In both cases, Nazi Germany and Zionist Israel, the official doctrine of ethnic-supremacy would create eternal conflict with all neighboring countries, and much of the world, until such time as the neighbors were totally crushed and dominated and the unwanted ethnicities and religions
wiped out or driven far, far away.

In both cases, much of the world would stand by, trying to profit as much as possible from the early "success" of a highly unified and officially racist doctrine, as it massacred tens of thousands of less favored ethnic types - until the danger got way too far out of hand and nuclear combat
became inevitable.

Dave Kersting
http://sos-at.blogspot.com/2007/11/nazi ... nists.html