zionist control of the nationalist movement in Finland

[yankeedoodle]

A long article here from Finland discussing the fact that Finnish nationalism is controlled by zionists.  This is typical of all nationalist movements, where Israhell presents itself as the leading ultra-nationalist state - a model to emulate - and they use money and influence and subterfuge to create "nationalist" leaders in countries that are beholden to zionists and are admirers of Israhell.  These "nationalist" leaders are then under the guidance and control of Israhell.  The "nationalist" leader claims to want a free and independent and strong country, and, yet, he is loyal to zionists and Israhell for their support.  Zionist and Israhell are the leaders of these "nationalist" "leaders."

IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BLUES, TUUKKA KURU, STILL A ZIONIST FAN OF JEWS?   
https://laitonlehti.net/2023/01/08/onko-sinimustien-puheenjohtaja-tuukka-kuru-sionisti/

MECHANICALLY TRANSLATED FROM FINNISH

There is a peculiar phenomenon in the Finnish nationalist field: Leading activists are extremely offended if they are asked if they are Zionists.

Laiton Lehti reportedly "gives rise to confrontation" when asking the leaders of the nationalist minor parties about their opinion on Zionists and Israel. You can't ask, even though the Zionists are making Finland a surrogate fighter for Israel and pushing the whole of Eastern Europe into a nuclear war.

You can't ask about Zionism, even though, apart from the PVL unknowns, almost ALL (97%) of the nationalist activists known from the videos were until a few years ago ardent Zionists who wanted to ally with the Jews against the Muslim bastards.

In fact, one of the important reasons for founding the Illittoman Lehti was to teach these nationalists about the true nature of Zionism and Jewish organizations. Last year, it seemed that even this goal of Ilitolma Lehti was fulfilled, when most people had learned to read Professor Kevin MacDonald and other rreaists.

However, after the war in Ukraine, Laiton Lehti realized that these "ex" Zionist nationalists, especially the Blue Blacks, were still Zionists. They had only confused the Ilitanta Lehte by secretly dividing the Jews into "bad" i.e. liberal Jews and "good" i.e. right-wing Jews. They say Israel is a good country because it is an ethno-state that punishes Muslims and their ally Russia. So the nationalists have to ally with the Zionists to destroy the Muslims and Russia.

This explains why these "ex" Zionists from Suomen Sisu to Sinimusti and Partisaani magazine do not want to make a fuss:

1. About Epstein's pedo ring and its possible connections with Finnish Jewish oligarchs

The blue-blacks and all other "nationalist" activists, organizations and media are silent about the possible mafia and Mossad connections of Finland's richest man, even though or because he is a far-right Likud Zionist who hates Russia.

2. About Zionist party hijackings

The blue-blacks don't want to talk about how in the 1990s the Russian Jewish oligarchs hijacked and robbed Russia. Even less blue-black people want to talk about how Finnish Jewish oligarchs, together with Swedish-speaking capital, have rotted Finnish politics through both mainstream media and party hijackings.

3. About the voting machines of the Zionist bastards

Some of the leadership of Sinimustie comes from Pers and knows Matti Putkonen, but never criticizes him and his voting machines. For a couple of years now, Laiton Lehti has asked readers to report immediately if Suomen Sisu or Sinimustat criticize the Putkos or even the voting machines. Not a word though.

4. Israel's alliance with jihadists

The blue-blacks never complain about how Israel supports the Saudis and ISIS. Silence prevails, even though specifically the Zionist wars give birth to both extreme Islam and huge waves of refugees.

Apparently, the Isis jihadists are a good bunch because they are fighting against the Russians in Syria.

5. About bringing pedo-Afghans to Finland

The blue-blacks were very quiet when the Finnish army was sent to drive the pedo-Afghans into Finland. On the other hand, you can't criticize the pets of NATO and the Zionists who participated in the blockade of Russia and Iran.

So these nationalist "ex" Zionists are still EXACTLY the same kind of Zionists as the bastards/reformers they came from. So it's no wonder that these Zionists have been able to rot almost all nationalist activity from the streets to the cabinets.

1. VKK

Of course, no one finds out about the thoughts and speeches of the ex-parliamentarian Ano Turtiainen, but both Hirvisaari and Piho, who served as his right and left hands, are Zionists. In the VKK, there is a huge fear of freemasons, but there is no need to fear Zionists. Vice versa. After all, the prophecies promise the Zionists victory.

2. The Nazis

During the war in Ukraine, the Nazis have also been subjugated to serve the Zionists. The craziest thing here is that the Nazis are not even ashamed. Vice versa. The Azov battalion with the wounded even visited/treated in the same place where the Isis soldiers lived in Israel.

3. Blue-blacks

Of course, the Blue Blacks, consisting of Nazis and fascists, are also allied with the Zionists. So they have already accepted the entry of 50,000 Slavs into the country and the destruction of Finland by NATO.

However, some do not believe in anything. I hear that Laiton Lehti is paranoid and "blackmails" Sinimusti and its leader Tuukka Kuru as Zionists, even though they have nothing to do with Zionism.

Oh no, right? Well, why has Tuukka Kuru, the chairman of the Blues, praised Israel and Zionism in the past? Look at this :

Palestinians: "Israel stole the land of the Palestinians!"

Tuukka Kuru: There has not been a single independent Arab-dominated state in the history of mankind. Palestine has been part of Byzantium, the Crusader States, Egypt, Turkey and finally part of the British Commonwealth. There were numerous attempts to divide the British-controlled mandate area between the Jews and the Palestinians, but the Palestinian Arabs did not agree to this.

Kuru's claim is really stupid and straight out of the extremist Zionist playbook. The question arises, does Kuru think that Finland in 1917 did not belong to the Finns because they had always been exploited by the colonial powers?

Also notice how Kuru completely ignores the fact that there were almost no Jews in Palestine in the late 19th century. The Romans expelled the Jews from Palestine about 2000 years ago. After this, Arabs have lived in Palestine for more than a thousand years.

It was only about a hundred years ago that Ashkenazi Jews from Eastern Europe, with the support of Western colonial masters, invaded Palestine and conquered it almost completely. If anything, this is mass immigration, i.e. aggressive mass immigration!

However, the Zionists claim that after 2000 years the Jews have the right to take back the lands of Palestine. Kuru seems to find this extreme Zionist argument valid. The question arises, does Kuru think the Sámi have the right to take over the whole of Finland with the support of the Russians, build an Apartheid regime that discriminates against Finns and put a large part of Finns in a concentration camp in Eastern Uusimaa? Would this be blue-black ethno-nationalism?

Kuru's Zionist writing is of course several years old, but it is still there on his New Finland blog without any corrections. The matter is made more serious by the fact that Kuru presents his positions through completely false historical writing. The narrative of history is always the basis of an individual's political thinking. Here is a small example of Kuru's crazy one-sided understanding of history.

Kuru's history is such childish and downright ecstatic extreme Zionism that it raises many kinds of questions. Even the most extreme believing Zionists do not dare to write such a thick bean. Kuru does owe a public explanation. Was he in the subjects when he wrote the story or did he belong to a Jewish sect?

Kuru's Zionist writings are made even more strange by the fact that he has already changed his ideas several times, first from classical liberalism to libertarianism and then to conservatism and finally even to fascism. During all these upheavals, however, one thing has remained: Zionism. According to Kuru , Zionism and classical liberalism also fit together. In fact, Kuru has loved Zionism so much that he has found it compatible with almost all ideas!

Therefore, Kuru should explain his relationship with Zionism. And besides, someone posing as a nationalist party leader can't have a Zionist bunny on his side. Why doesn't he correct his Zionist history by linking it to some genuine nationalist analysis? Oh yeah. That would be anti-Zionist.

(As a side plot, Laiton Lehti admits that it is annoyed by Kuru's habit of always changing his ideas on the fly every couple of years, but never accidentally ends up in the paleolibertarianism favored by Laittoman Lehti. Could it be because paleolibertarianism is one of the few ideas that are completely anti-Zionist. .)

All this also raises another and even more important question: How much and how quickly should a politician turn his coat? This is a very important question, because the Finnish nationalistic field has probably set a world record for coat turns. For example, a few years ago nationalist demonstrations began to be led by a person who had led Antifa anarchists a couple of years earlier!

However, in the opinion of almost all Finnish nationalists, the Antifa background was not such a serious matter. A person can always change his mind! Besides, embracing homonationalism proved a conversion!

Really. During the worst death wave, more than 90% of nationalists shared that opinion. Again, this says a lot about the degree of naivety of the Finnish people.

Now, in many people's opinion, there is nothing surprising in the fact that a few years ago a person who swore by extreme Zionism starts to lead ethno-nationalists!

But what if it were done like in other countries: If you convert from anarchism or Zionism to REAL nationalism AND you want to lead real nationalistic organizations, then at least three things should be required:

1. Public explanation

You write an article in which you explain why you have completely changed your thinking. (However, you can't do this if you haven't really changed your thinking.)

2. You correct your old writings

You correct or delete your old posts praising anarchism/Zionism. However, you don't do this secretly, you publicly say that you have completely changed your thinking.

3. Insurance

You declare that you have gotten rid of anarchism/Zionism/Cultural Marxism. In this context, your social network should also assure you that you are no longer lesbian/homosexual or fraternizing with anarchists/homonationalists/Zionists.

Are these three demands too much for naive Finnish people? Of course it is. You have to trust people!