Jews Declare War on America

[yankeedoodle]

Jews Declare War on America
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2023/11/05/jews-declare-war-on-america/

by Josephus Tiberius

We face an unprecedented and revolutionary situation.  The Jews have declared war on America.

This is a disaster for America, and may also be a disaster for the Jews.

A little background.

At a moment when Israel is fighting for its very life (if one is to credit the analysis of Scott Ritter (Scott Ritter, "Why I no longer stand with Israel") and retired U.S. Army Col. Douglas MacGregor ("Israel has LOST no matter what they do! WW3 is HERE!" at 9:18), not to mention Israeli IDF retired Major General Itshak Brik (Israel could cease to exist before 80th anniversary, says ex-premier Barak), and Israel is absolutely dependent on American support (Macgregor: "Israel played right into their hands.. They have LOST BIG TIME!" at minute 9), the Jews have decided to open a second front!  And maybe a far more dangerous one.  A front against America.

For the Jews, this is very foolish.  Even in the worst case (for the Jews), if Israel is annihilated or its population expelled, the Jews still have the United States as a refuge — a refuge which they have spent 100 years spitting on and one which they disdain, but a refuge nonetheless.  Moreover, it is exactly this refuge that could — if anything can — ensure that the first object of their affections — Israel — continues to exist.

One would think that this would be the time U.S.-based Jews would "cool it" on the "anti-Semitism" war they have been waging on any and all deviating from the "Jewish" line for the past century — even if just for a time, to avoid alienating the great power that is the only thing standing between Israel and its potential destruction.

But no.  The Jews since the October 7 Hamas attack have essentially declared war not on Hamas — the IDF is haltingly attempting to do that — but on Americans!  And not just on any Americans, but on the most precious commodity that non-Jewish Americans — whether Christian, Muslim Americans possess.  Their children.

Beyond this, the Jews have declared war not on "any old" Christian/Muslim/Shinto/Buddhist/Hindu children, but on the very best and brightest of all of them — the ones at Harvard, University of Pennsylvania, Cornell, MIT, and, by implication, the ones at all the other top Universities in the United States.

A timeline is in order:

October 10.  Jewish billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman calls for the "unmasking" of all students at Harvard who signed an October 8 pro-Palestinian petition.  As discussed in an earlier article this petition was relatively benign, saying nothing that had not been  said 70 years before by Israeli heroes General Moshe Dayan (Moshe Dayan's Eulogy for Roi Rutenberg — April 19, 1956) and Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion (Ben-Gurion's Notorious Quotes: Their Polemical Uses & Abuses — Partners For Progressive Israel )— not to mention Israeli founding father Ze'ev Jabotinsky in his writings starting in the 1920's. "The Iron Wall" (jewishvirtuallibrary.org) .

October 11.  Famed Jewish Harvard constitutional law professor Alan Dershowitz (retired but still overly active) calls for the same thing, saying he will "unmask" every student involved in any statement blaming Israel for the violence in the Middle East.

October 11.  Professor Dershowitz "unmasks" a Black lesbian law student who had issued a manifesto similar to that issued at Harvard.  As if on cue, a "Big law" law firm Winston & Strawn then withdraws its offer of summer employment to this unfortunate black lesbian law student, stating as its reason her statements on  "Holy" Israel.

October 12.  Jewish Mega-billionaire Leslie Wexner (who does not know, never knew, Jeffrey Epstein) follows suit with Bill Ackman, threatening to use his influence to destroy the reputations of any student taking a non-Israeli line.  Wexner, the creator of the "Limited" brand and Victoria Secret is a man to be reckoned with.  Although he has never been convicted of a crime, his tax lawyer, Arthur Shapiro was found in front of a condominium door, dead, having been shot several times with a pistol — Les Wexner's tax attorney Arthur Shapiro was murdered in 1985 in what looked like a Mafia "hit." The crime was never solved. This Columbus Ohio police report discusses Wexner's ties to organized crime. : r/Epstein (reddit.com); Who Murdered Arthur Shapiro, the Lawyer of Victoria's Secret Billionaire Les Wexner? (thedailybeast.com)  See also   A Kingpin, the Mob, and a Murder: The Deeper Mystery behind the Arthur Shapiro Homicide (unlimitedhangout.com)  Rumors of connections to persons associated with organized crime have dogged the poor Mr. Wexner over the years. A Kingpin, the Mafia and a Murder: The Deepest Mystery Behind Arthur Shapiro's Assassination (reseauinternational.net).  How unjust!   As one of Shakespeare's solid citizens might say:  "Who steals my purse steals trash...but he that filches from me my good name makes me poor indeed."  Iago, Othello, Act III.

In October, Apollo Global Management CEO Marc Rowan urged alumni to "close their checkbooks" until Penn attacks "anti-semitism." (He is Jewish despite his WASPY sounding name — remember Rowan and Martin's "Laugh In"?) and subservient to mega-billionaire Jewish founder Leon Black, as well as Chairman of the New York United Jewish Appeal.

In October, TV producer, Jewish Richard Wolf, announces he will follow suit with Rowan.

In October.  John Huntsman, not Jewish but from time to time interested in politics at the national level requiring Jewish money, followed suit with Rowan, saying that the Huntsman Foundation would "close its checkbook".

October 17.  Ronald Lauder threatens to pull all funding from the University of Pennsylvania.  Billionaire Ronald Lauder threatens to pull funding if UPenn doesn't do more to fight antisemitism | CNN Business .  Like Clifford Asness (below) he whined about the highly dangerous — help, help! — Palestinian writer's conference.

October.  David Magerman (Jewish) of mega math hedge fund Rennaisance Technologies, founded by Jewish James "Jim" Simons, said he was closing his checkbook as well, for the same reasons.

October 18.  Jewish billionaire hedge fund manager Clifford Asness decides to "withdraw funding" due, in part, to a Palestinian writer's conference at which a number of individuals presumably said "not nice" things about "all perfect" Israel.

October 18.  Jewish law professor at the University of California-Berkeley School of Law, one of the nation's leading law schools, Steven Solomon in a public letter urged that employers NOT hire his own students — that is, those that do not buy the "I love Israel" narrative.  By the way, has he called on Cravath Swine & Moore not to hire Jewish students who were calling for the support of Israel?  Of course not, because they, lucky for them, chose the "right" side.  Solomon should be fired immediately.  If Jewish law professors behave in this fashion, this will be a very good reason for Berkeley — a public school, bound explicitly by the first amendment as a government actor — may quietly decide to "dial down" on the number of Jewish professors given tenure from here on out.  How can you run a law school which advertises that its own professors will destroy your chances for a legal career if you have the wrong opinion on a shit-hole country in the Middle East?

October 18.  As if on cue, big law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell revoked offers to Harvard and Columbia students that had signed anti-Israel statements.  Ironically, it appears these students are in an exclusive "club" at Davis Polk.  It appears that Frank Lyon Polk himself, the co-founder of Davis Polk and the "Polk" in the name of that firm, would have his job offer revoked as well.  He was Undersecretary of State to Secretary of State Robert Lansing, under whom the State Department was firmly anti-Zionist and opposed to any U.S. approval of the Balfour Declaration.   On top of everything else, the complete ignorance of current Davis Polk partners of their antecedents is additional evidence of the complete rot at the heart of the governing class of the United States.

October 26.  Leon Cooperman, former Goldman Sachs investment strategist, now running his own billion-dollar hedge fund, Omega Partners, announced suspension of any funding of his alma mater Columbia University (Cooperman graduated from Columbia Business School in 1967).  Cooperman said, memorably:

"These kids at the colleges have shit for brains," Cooperman told "The Claman Countdown" host Liz Claman on Wednesday (Emphasis added). (Sorry Lord Leon — actually they are probably a lot smarter than you are, since, in 1965 Columbia was almost open admissions compared to the admissions competitiveness today).  "We have one reliable ally in the Middle East. That's Israel. We only have one democracy in the Middle East. That's Israel. And we have one economy tolerant of different people, gays, lesbians, etc. That's Israel. So they have no idea what these young kids are doing."

"Now, the real shame is, I've given to Columbia probably about $50 million over many years," he continued. "And I'm going to suspend my giving. I'll give my giving to other organizations."Billionaire Leon Cooperman pulling Columbia funding amid student protests: These kids have 's— for brains' | Fox Business

So based on this amateurish diplomatic analysis, which would be contradicted firmly by at least one former Secretary of State (George Marshall) and Secretary of Defense (James Forrestal), he wants to shut down any speech critical of Israel?  Perhaps the one with "shit for brains" is not some 150 IQ Columbia student, but a past-his-sell-by-date Leon Cooperman.

November 2.  Steve Eisman, a senior portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman, of "Big Short" fame (see The Big Short by Michael Lewis), any student who "holds up a sign that says 'free Palestine from the river to the sea should be expelled'" from the university !!! (Emphasis added.) (Steve Eisman tells UPenn to strip his name off scholarship amid Israel-Hamas war) So in a country whose most prominent statesmen, George Kennan, George Marshall, and Loy Henderson, each strongly urged that Israel not even be created, and which we now know was created due not only to death threats, but primarily to a bribe of $2 million (in 1948 money — maybe $30 million today) in cash delivered by Jewish supremacist Abe Feinberg to a deeply corrupt President Harry Truman (who we now know was busy stealing from his $200,000 (1948 dollars) expense fund) (see The Truman Show) we are now at a point where no person urging that that arguably mistaken formation be reversed— presumably including Kennan, Marshall, and Henderson were they still of college age — can be allowed to attend college?  Fuck you, Eisman.  And the horse you rode in on.

On October 31,  Bill Ackman — apparently after having received some "push back ", perhaps by Larry Summers, the Jewish former President of Harvard, says he is "re-thinking" his position, and perhaps it would be better not to publicly "unmask" anti-Israel students.  Oddly enough, the new student rant he was discussing involved much worse (at least this author would think) than the original pro-Palestinian statement.  It involved an anonymous Harvard student that called, literally, for the death of all Jews "like Hitler."  Apparently, Ackman was not sufficiently bothered by this to call for his unmasking (!!!!).  So maybe this guy will at some point be the pediatrician to Bill's grandchildren, out of Harvard Medical School.  So as to Ackman's thought (if you can call them that) processes, I just have to say, as Jose Luis Borges might have said: "yo no comprendo".—Just a little later, Ackman said the pro-Palestinian students, rather than being doxed, should be forced into re-education programs that apparently — or so Ackman thinks — will convince them to reverse all their firmly held positions and volunteer in the IDF.  Good luck, bro.

Then Bill Ackman went full authoritarian, now saying that, rather than unmask students, Harvard et al. should simply be told that no investment bank, hedge fund, or public company will hire any Harvard graduates unless Harvard converts itself into a police state, harassing and chasing down — and presumably expelling — all students not taking the prescribed line on Israel.

Then — I guess the bedsore that is Bill Ackman will be a never-ending story. Ackman comes up with a new angle, this time regarding a large group of Harvard Palestinian supporters confronting a Jewish activist attempting to photograph and "dox" them.  Apparently in the group confronting the "doxer" was the fuzzy picture of a White student whom Ackman somehow has identified as a member of the editorial staff of the Harvard Law Review, possibly the most intellectually elite legal journal in the United States.  Ackman demands that the Law Review editor — who, like his other editors, are the most sought-after law students in the United States by Judges, law firms, and other potential employers — be "unmasked" and denied employment of any kind after graduation.

November 1.  Twenty Four of the largest and most prestigious law firms in the United States issue letters to all the top law schools in the United States to the effect that, if each of them does not take unspecified "steps" to eliminate "anti-semitism," none of these  law firms will hire any graduates of those Law Schools.  These include such formerly WASP bastions as Cravath Swaine & Moore, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk & Wardwell (see above), and Debevoise & Plimpton, as well as traditionally Catholic / WASP firms such as Wilkie Farr & Gallegher.  Presumably these firms either have been taken over completely by Jewish senior partners or have so many Jewish clients that they felt compelled to issue this mind-boggling statement. These law firms and banks are — apart from the hi-tech employers on the West Coast — the principal bastion of high paying jobs and influential careers in the United States.  If all but sycophants of the Jews are cut off from these firms, the result will be a collapsing disaster for the freedom and economic prospects of the rest of America.

If these threats are carried out, this is nothing short of a disaster for non-Jewish Americans.  This is, in a word, a direct frontal assault on every non-Jewish American.

If the best and brightest of non-Jews — whether they be White Christians, Blacks, middle eastern Muslims, Latin-American immigrant Catholics (note that except for diminutive Paraguay every country in the Western Hemisphere apart from the U.S. is calling for a cease-fire in Gaza), Chinese, Japanese, Indians, or Pakistani Muslims — cannot find future employment except at the sufferance of Jews, we will be entering a revolutionary stage where non-Jews have only the option of violent revolution to displace an increasingly oppressive Jewish tyranny.  Effectively, it is a non-violent version of Lenin's recommendation.  He said that if you jailed, killed, or otherwise neutralized the top 10,000 of the bourgeoisie, you controlled the nation, because the remaining bourgeoisie would have no leadership.  If the Jews deprive non-Jewish Americans of their 10,000 per year leadership class (approximately the population of the Ivies), they cut off non-Jewish opposition at the head.

So this is an existential battle.

Well, what about Congress, you say?  It is "elected" and thus cannot be run by a mere 5 million Jews?  Wrong, or at least so it appears.

A deeply conservative new Speaker of the House has just stage managed a large aid package for our "dear friend, Israel," with only two Republican dissenters. (Democrats opposed it because it was to be paid for by cutting funds for the IRS.)

Part of the problem was described by Trotsky in his book The Russian Revolution.  He pointed out that, in tranquil times, elected representatives tended to represent well the views of the people who elected them; if views of the electorate shifted, the shift would ge gradual; this shift would then generally be reflected in the next election, resulting in a legislature back in tune with its electorate.  However, Trotsky pointed out, in revolutionary times, this is not the case.  The views of the people shift so dramatically and so quickly that, shortly after election, legislators are already out of tune with their electorate and remain so for an unendurably long tome — until the next election, often years off.

When one also factors in the ossifying and overwhelming effect of Jewish-money and Jewish-controlled media in political campaigns, we have a legislature that responds only to its donors and to media pressure, not to its electorate.  In such cases, both parties put up candidates taking the "pro-Jewish" view, so who cares who wins?

We are in revolutionary times with an ossified Congress, bound in by Jewish money and Jewish media, unable to take actions necessary to protect 350 million Americans from a predatory Jewish financial elite that now appears to be determined to crush out the last glimmering dissent to total Jewish supremacy.

It is astounding that 350 million non-Jewish Americans are dominated by 5 million Jews in a supposedly "democratic" republic.  See Why Are Jews So Influential?   But that's where we are.

In an actual democratic republic, our legislators would quickly enact legislation under the commerce clause prohibiting any company engaged in interstate commerce (a very broad designation) from conditioning or denying employment based on the political views of the applicants, enforced by heavy criminal penalties, including significant jail time.  This should of course be coupled with similar restrictions on "denial of service' by banks, financial institutions, and internet accounts such as Youtube, X, and Facebook.  We could call these a "Freedom to Work Act" and a "Freedom to Think Act".  But fat chance either of these would ever get through our Jewish-dominated legislature.

We quoted Lenin before.  So let's quote him again.  Lenin famously asked, "what is to be done?"  Well, what is to be done?  That is the signal issue of our times.

Here are some suggestions.  Not a lot, but more than nothing:

(1) Activism directed not against Israel, but against American Jews, specifically those like Dershowitz and Ackman who seek to deprive non-Jewish Americans of their free speech.  Instead of a million-man march on Park Avenue or in London, have a million-man march around their homes, perhaps on a "flash mob" basis.

(2) Activism at their places of business.  Have a million-man swarm around 125 Broad Street (Sullivan & Cromwell) and 450 Lexington Avenue (Davis Polk).  And the offices of all the other Firms.

(3) Activism at the homes and vacation homes of the controlling partners of these firms.  Have million man "flash mobs" outside the homes of H. Rodgin Cohen and Joseph Shenker, the two most powerful partners at Sullivan & Cromwell these days, both Jews, and undoubtedly part of the S&C group behind S&C's signing of the group "fuck you" letter to American law schools.

(4) Similar activism at the homes of the members of the executive or management committees at each of the other firms on the list as well (don't want to be discriminatory here), whether such members are Jews or just pathetic Shabbos goyim.

(5) Similar activism — flash marches — at the elite private schools attended by any children or grandchildren of these "big shot" lawyers.  Since what is good for the goose is good for the gander, make sure the signs at these demonstrations — like the ones at Harvard — contain the photographs and names of each of those children, perhaps coupled with "Shame!" or "grandson of bloody murderers" or some such.

(6) Petitions to state pension funds to demand they cease yielding over billions of investment capital to any hedge fund manager involved in these anti-free speech campaigns.  None of the "hedgies" would have more than the net worth of a New Jersey dentist if not for the "carry" on massive amount of state pension fund money.

(7) Ditto (6) for all college endowments and private pension plans.

( Until when and if "Freedom to Work" and "Freedom to Live" acts are passed into law by Congress, similar demonstrations at the offices and homes of the members of the labor committees and communications committees of the U.S. Senate and House.

In a word, since we cannot appear to control these thugs through proper legislation by the Congress, make the lives of the thugs carrying out this campaign a living hell unitl something — anything — breaks.

1/  In many of those law firms, Jewish partners displaced the old WASP partners in the late 1970's to 80's, a development that seemed anodyne at the time but with ominous consequences that are now becoming fully visible.  Moreover, the important clients of these firms became more Jewish.  As late as 1985, half of all M&A transactions were processed through traditionalist WASP Morgan Stanley & Co, Incorporated, the most elite investment bank in the U.S. with very few Jewish partners.  Morgan Stanley and its sister commercial bank, J.P. Morgan, were the two principal clients of Davis Polk in those years.  In addition, there were a number of other WASP investment banks — though with some Jewish partners — with very high prestige:  First Boston, Kidder Peabody, Paine Webber, etc.  Those non-Jewish investment banks — together with the Jewish Goldman Sachs — plus firmly "all American" firms like Exxon, were the principal clients of Sullivan Cromwell.  Cravath, generally more on the issuer side than the investment banking side, had principal clients such as non-Jewish IBM, General Electric, and such like.   No more.  Morgan is still a big player but for many years was overshadowed by the much more famous Goldman Sachs, and the other WASP firms have all vanished in bankruptcies or sell-outs.  So not only are the most powerful partners of these law firms principally Jewish, their clients are too.  For instance, one of the signatories, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett arguably has become slightly less Jewish-dominated than it was in the mid 1980's, being headed by non-Jewish Richard Beattie and a number of non-Jewish administrative partners.  However, Beattie's principal clients are Jewish-owned KKR and Blackstone.  In addition, many of the most prominent clients today are small, but incredibly lucrative hedge funds, probably more than half of which are run by their original founding entrepreneurial Jews, such as Apollo (Leon Black of Drexel fame), KKR (mentioned above), Blackstone (Steve Schwarzman), and a host of others, last but not least including Pershing Capital, owned and run by infamous Bill Ackman.