Who owns Sanofi-Aventis drug company?

[edis2k]

Hello brothers, in need of a little help with a topic of discussion. My neise recently got sick with an ear infection and a cough and cold infection, the docter gave framycetin sulfate BP 0.5% eye/ear drops. I googled the company which is hoechst marion roussel which is the branch company of Sanofi-Aventis which is the 3rd biggest drug company in the world the 2nd drug which is in liquid form is Amoxycillin, havent heard anything bad about this one though but could prove to be something to look at. The Hoechst AG was one of the co-founders. of IG Farben, in my memory i've read somewhere that IG Farben is quite a nasty drug. In all my research i've found that all the drug companies big or small arnt selling us drugs to our benefit. Found the shareholders of the company and non of them seem to be of leathal intent. Wasnt able to dig out any much than that.
http://www.transnationale.org/companies ... ventis.php

Note: Not sure if this is the right place to post this. thanks for the help

[joeblow]

I have a B.S. in Biochemistry and have recently taken a few courses in Pharmacy. If you want to know about a specific drug, just ask away.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanofi-Aventis

Aventis was formed in 1999 when Rh

[edis2k]

Thanks for the help, yea the drug that was given is - framycetin sulfate BP and Amoxycillin. I'm thinking that any drug is a bad drug. But scared to make the decision to take her of it just in case something happens.

[sullivan]

Thanks for the help, yea the drug that was given is - framycetin sulfate BP and Amoxycillin. I'm thinking that any drug is a bad drug. But scared to make the decision to take her of it just in case something happens.

Amoxycillin is a moderate-spectrum antibiotic, part of the penicillin family. Framycetin is an ophthalmic antibiotic used to treat eye infections.

[§N9sh2bj]

with a due respect to all Commentators on edis's problem:

Pill antibiotics are ingested by swallowing, which destroys the natural bacteria of the gut. This leads to greatly reduced appetite and diarrhea. Anti-biotic is anti-biological. Apart from being 'naturally' derived at some early point from mold on bread, per propaganda, they are irradiated to make them grow very fast. What else does this do to them?

Swallowed antibiotics, even one dose, is a bad idea, IMHO. The best way I found when I was already very sick and did not have access to any other means, is to opt for a big needle in the butt-cheek. The doctor can numb the area first with a tiny needle loaded with local anesthetic. They had offered me a pack of oral antibiotics, but after forgetting all my best advice and taking one, I opted for the needle and was 100% the next morning, versus destroying all my gut bacteria.

In agreement with EDIS2K's strong intuition, the intuitive force must be respected the most.
Talk yourself through your resistance to see what is behind it. You probably already know enough, but your conscious mind gets in the way of hearing the message as clearly as it would with no TV, no Radio, no Press, no advertising, no music, and no talkative relatives and friends (who share what they get from the same sources). Create the vacuum within which you can think!
Do not try to logically argue the posted positions of the pharmo companies in your self talk.
"We do it to make money." Banks make money, not pharmo companies.
Pharmo companies provide services and products, partly in exchange for a paper currency.
Mostly it seems the objective is to provide those services and products.
If the pharmo companies could exist in a world with no currency aspect, it seems they would anyway.
Many services and products are almost universally poor and intentionally designed to create a detrimental effect on the health of human beings. Included services are 'educating' doctors.
Deriving an income from creating many poisons, while creating a very few useful niche items, makes a legitimate cover of plausible deniability for the plebes.

The CIA and other intelligence agencies have income-generating fronts for legitimacy.
i.e. Mossad creating a cover using IDF 'grads' to sell Dead Sea salts and creams in malls.

The homeostasis of your niece seems upset. Biology - life - comes from chemistry, therefore changing the chemistry of a biological body can result in all kinds of symptoms, including a depressed immune system, a kind of vacuum for the bug to reside, or a life-negative space for the body. The people who control the present control the past, control the future*; including flooding the high school, college, MSM Book etc space with skewed info or outright fraud, influencing the decisions your niece and her mother & father make about her 'health'-care. So I find, it is a bad idea to naively trust information outside of direct, personal experience. Direct, personal experience is all I can recommend: The direct, personal experience I have is people get healthy and stay well,
* when a person does not use toxic or strong chemicals for cleaning. Soap and chemicals in the water are included (Bathing, showering),
* people do not use 'teen' - synthetic or strong, they all eventually smell the same - deodorants and antiperspirants
** the toxic soaps people use for their clothes, combined with a diet of McDonalds, seems to make their sweat smell worse.
* when a person is aware the bizarre concern over non-ionizing radiation causing cancer (WLAN, Cell phone) is a foil for all the real ionizing radiation, so-called 'background' radiation, covering the globe, from over 100 above-ground nuclear 'tests' which have been done (I think it was a hundred or more, right? Cite any studies, counter-studies please)
* when people DO NOT take the drugs or vaccines given by these agencies of the State (pharmo, etc).
* when they absolutely reject unfounded FEAR on it's face. Fear upsets a persons' homeostasis.
** Fear of little 'terrorist' bugs, nay proteins even! Retarded.
** Fear of man-sized 'terrorists'. Also retarded.
** Fear of big explosion-sized 'terrorists'.

Once a person can reject these fears as utterly ridiculous and forgo bad medicine for good health, like one rejects an unnecessary vaccine, better health is right around the corner. There is no doubt there are some prudent uses for a few pharmaceuticals. Probably not in the oral tract.

* Orwell. 1984.