All the law can be printed on a 3x5 card...

[Anonymous]

The Commercial Maxims (defined)

1. A workman is worthy of his hire
(Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II
Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: "It is against equity for freemen
not to have the free disposal of their own property.").



A "workman" is one who supports their life with labour.
A "workman who, is worthy of his hire" is some one, (by the very definition), whom is not a slave (debtor).
A "workman who is worthy of his hire" is therefore, none other than, a free-man (*creditor*), the master of his world.
It is against equity (equality) for freemen (*creditors/masters*) not to have free disposal of their own property.
That makes sense....only freemen (*creditors/masters*) can claim to "own property".
Slaves (debtors)...on the other hand...own nothing and therefore, everything they have is held in their master's name, the governments created STRAW MAN aka PERSON.
Corporations (governments) own all they create......don't they?
No "person" in Canada (CANADA) can produce "legal title" (ownership) to any property...at least I have never witnessed "legal title" to anything held by any "person" in Canada (CANADA).
There are a lot of people holding toilet paper evidencing some form of abstract title and erroneously assuming this paper is "legal title in fact", but it is in every instance, not legal title to anything...but, a mere "copy" evidencing a slave (debtor).
The only document having full and complete standing in any dispute (court) is the original blue ink signed legal instrument.
Anything else is suspect, quite possibly an "impostor, fake or forgery".
So....it is most unfortunate that every person outside this author is therefore, a verifiable, provable and self admitted debtor/slave who can not claim the recourse and remedy offered here today.
So..........
Unless your state has clear & explicit laws claiming the right to slavery and own slaves then you have just been shown the escape hatch to free yourself of tyranny.
After comprehending this you have no right to complain about anything.......NOTHING!
"JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP & MOVE TO THE BACK OF THE BUS!!"




2. All are equal under the Law
(God's Law--Ethical and Natural Law). (Exodus 21:23-25;
Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke
10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: "No one is above the
law."; "Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be
common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the
private gain of a few.").


By the very proposition that where, "All" are not equal under the Law then, there is no Law....only the fake appearance of Law, colourable at best and no one, to a man, could claim to uphold anything....especially, the "Law".
And that includes, but, is not limited to....lawyers/solicitors, who, through the British Accredited Registry and Law Societies have monopolized commerce and therefore, the "Law", governing it for their own private selfish gain. (this may be confirmed by looking for the section in the law society's rules [Legal Profession Act 1990 sec.30] thereby, giving sole dominion [copyright] to the Law via statutes and courts, to none other than "lawyers",....members...in good standing....while holding a subsisting certificate)
Slaves (debtors) have no known recourse or remedy to the law or courts....even if they pay.





3. In Commerce truth is sovereign
(Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; Matt. 6:33, John 8:32; II Cor.
13:8. Legal maxim: "To lie is to go against the mind."


No one....can monkey with the truth.
Only the person of unsound mind or a child (both wards of the court) can claim the truth doesn't matter versus, perpetrating a lie.
If truth is absent or disallowed in a court or in law then, by the very absence of truth there exists no law, society or court and thus, this is the very foundation of what's known as "subject matter jurisdiction".
The truth will evict all liars from the law and court.




4. Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit
(Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt.
5:33; James 5:12).


The only communication recognized by government and its members, chartered parties, etc as having any credible legal standing and/or truth is the "affidavit".
Anything else, is a little "iffy" at best.





5. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in
Commerce (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: "He
who does not deny, admits.").


This is the Law of Equity and equity, as we all know well....is brutal.
If one fails to rebut the unproved assumptions and presumptions prior to court then, one agrees by ones own non-response...that the charges are true and correct.
Therefore, the judge in the dispute can only come to the conclusion (for want of evidence) that ones failure to rebut the charge(s) means...."you are guilty" by NiHIL DICIT, [Latin, He says nothing. It is the failing of the defendant to put in a plea or answer to the plaintiff's declaration by the day assigned; and in this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane's Ab. Index, h. t.]




6. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment
in Commerce (Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court,
tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or
"duel," of commercial affidavits wherein the points
remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the
matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.).


All disputes are "won" or "lost" (determined and settled) prior to appearance for trial in court.
The judge's so-called "ruling/judgment" is simply a formality for "public" consumption.
Some lawyers in Ontario have recently "claimed" truth doesn't necessarily apply in law or the courts. (unless of course, "they have your prior consent")
Only a fool such as Pontius Pilates or a Pharisee's scribe would make that claim to fame in regards to this author.




7. A matter must be expressed to be resolved
(Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: "He
who fails to assert his rights has none.").


Hence, the need for the affidavit/counter affidavit.
If one does not use it then, one must by default...lose.




8. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by
default (Book of Job; Matt. 10:22. Legal maxim: "He who
does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.").

A respondent/accused/defendant who fails to show up by Canada Post, sheriff or deliver the affidavit with witness, is seen as having vacated the legal arena (battle field) and must suffer the consequences of defeat.
"LAW IS WAR....isn't it?"




9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility
(One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear
an oath that he consents to claim against his commercial
liability in the event that any of his statements or actions is
groundless or unlawful, has no basis to assert claims or
charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim
authority.) (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen, maxim: "He who
bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.").



Anyone who, is unwilling to clarify and back up ones claim in written form complete with signature then, can only be seen that they have no valid (legal or lawful) claim and must vacate the legal arena.





10. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through
rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point, resolution by
jury, or payment (Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelation. Legal
maxim: "If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the
defendant is absolved.").



A matter of a lien or claim must be expressed to be resolved by counter affidavit point-for-point, jury or payment whereupon in absence thereof, the plaintiff's claim is abandoned for want of subject matter jurisdiction.

           This is all there is to man's offer of law, therefore,  
                   
                     Ignorance of the Law is no excuse
           
Everything else is merely smoke and mirrors obfuscating this truth.
         
         The State pays for knowledge of law.  The State does not know "the law"... It needs "legal advice".  Makes me think about that cartoon, a lawyer sitting at a desk says to his client... "do you want my legal opinion, or do you want the truth".
Karl-Heintz Eisbrenner, M.A. (Oxon.); L.L.B.    
 

 There is no other way to level the playing field

Use of a Notary or Commissioner of Oaths is for attestation and verification purposes and does not constitute adhesion, contract or change in status in any manner. All rights reserved without prejudice.

Jackie-Grant-Vel'oice: Harper
c/o 1040-B 20th Street West,                                                                                                                                                                               Saskatoon city, Saskatchewan province.
Free-man-on-the-Land, Non-consenting and ungoverned
All Rights Reserved, Exercised at Will and Fully Defended, By the Grace of God, The Rule of Law and the Law of the Land.

[targa2]

Jurisdiction = oath spoken !!!

[Ognir]

All are equal under the Law
(God's Law-

Unfortunately, we have a group that rejected that point of view and allows nutcase RABBIS to do so

Welcome to you both

[Anonymous]

The Ten Maxims of Commerce are basically Jewish Law (Old Testament).
And there is nothing like taking their law (acceptance)....and spinning the table 180 degrees and pointing to that which they claim as their own law, while seeking clarification.
It puts them on the spot every single time where they never rebut the offer thereby, placing them in default.
The police here have stated right to my face that I have immunity.
That is not true....wrong choice of words.
Only dead legal fictions (corporate entities) can claim immunity.
I simply fired my representatives in government and then ask the cops who are they claiming as a principal in order to hand me bills (charges).
No law (statute) exists that states you can not fire someone claiming to re-present you.
No is, No ands, No buts.