Catch 22 Radio - Bermas, Ostrovsky, Reality Bomb

[mgt23]

Upload in 4 hours.........

Ostrovsky
http://tracker.umunu.com/index.php?page ... fd8a893de8

http://www.askmoses.com/en/article/174, ... a-Jew.html

Regardless of what you believe or how you live your life, you're Jewish if you fit either one of the following categories:

1) Your mother is Jewish, as was her mother and her mother and her maternal great-great grandmother...who stood by Mount Sinai

when G-d gave the Torah and chose the Jews to be His nation.

2) You – or your mother or her mother, etc. – has undergone a proper conversion.1

Judaism is the life a Jew ought to live, but its observance (or lack thereof) is not the defining factor of Jewish identity.

Footnotes

    * 1. See "What is the Conversion process?" (http://www .askmoses.com/en/article/174,2055053/Who-is-a-Jew.
      html)

http://www.askmoses.com/en/article/174, ... a-Jew.html
Question:

Practically speaking, what does it mean to be a Jew?

Answer:

To be a Jew is to be a moral and spiritual heir to those who stood at Mount Sinai, an heir to the world's most ancient,

resilient and awe-inspiring faith.

To be a Jew is to inherit a legacy which has shaped moral civilization and earned the universal admiration for its dedication

to family, its commitment to education, its values of charity and social justice, and the belief that human life is sacred.

To be a Jew is to be part of a journey begun by Abraham and Sarah and continued by their children until today. This way of

life can only be sustained through the Jewish family, and a conscious choice to build a Jewish home. A child who has been

touched by Judaism's spirit of eternity would never willingly snap the link between the past and the future.

To be a Jew is to study the Torah and strive to follow in its ways. The renewal of Torah education is the only route to the

renewal of the Jewish people. This is the greatest gift we can give to the Jewish past and the Jewish future.


http://www.askmoses.com/en/article/174, ... -Jews.html


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_point_(Tipler)

To emphasize the scientific nature of the Omega Point Theory, let me state here that I am at present forced to consider

myself an atheist, in the literal sense that I am not a theist. (A-theist means "not theist.") I do not yet even believe in

the Omega Point. The Omega Point Theory is a viable scientific theory of the future of the physical universe, but the only

evidence in its favor at the moment is theoretical beauty, for there is as yet no confirming experimental evidence for it.

Thus scientifically one is not compelled to accept it at the time of my writing these words. So I do not. [Antony] Flew,

among others, has in my opinion made a convincing case for the presumption of atheism.

 If the Omega Point Theory and all possible variations of it are disconfirmed, then I think atheism in the sense of Flew,

Hume, Russell, and the other self-described atheists is the only rational alternative. But of course I also think the Omega

Point Theory has a very good chance of being right, otherwise I would never have troubled to write this book. If the Omega

Point Theory is confirmed, I shall then consider myself a theist.

A Couple

Once upon a pagan world there lived a single monotheistic couple: Abraham and Sara.1

People say belief in G-d is old fashioned, but truth be told, back in the day not only was belief in G-d unfashionable; it

was completely unheard of. Abraham and Sara were mavericks going against the mainstream, pioneers exploring new

possibilities, and lovers in love with an unheard of G-d.

This love for G-d was considered illegal at the time. Their values went against the common trends and norms. Their life was

often at risk.2 But their commitment to G-d took precedence over their concern for public opinion, and their sincerity was

stronger than their concern for personal safety. They believed in something un-believable, something unpopular, and they

wouldn't hide this belief; they brought this unbelievable idea to the general population.3

A Family

G-d was touched. The relationship was mutual. G-d loved them too.

This was no romantic novel. This was true love. This was a love that seemed would never end.

And it didn't. G-d blessed Abraham and Sara, who were childless at the time, with a child who would begin a family of

children that would grow as many as the stars in the sky and the sand on the beach.4 These children would keep the love

affair for eternity.

    The mission of one couple to introduce G-d to the world, to bring all of creation to its Creator... was now being carried

out methodically by their 3 million descendants.

A Tribe

Little Isaac was born.5 He carried on his parents' legacy and passed it along to his son Jacob.6 Jacob had twelve sons of his

own.7 He also had a new G-d given name, Israel.8 Israel's children had children and the family was growing; the love affair

continued.9

In a short 400 years G-d's blessing had materialized into a family of some 3 million people.10 Abraham and Sara must have

been proud. G-d was ecstatic. He was ready to take this relationship to the next level.

He proposed.11 The children of Israel accepted.12 They were married at the foot of a mountain.13

The relationship now had documented commitments engraved in stone. The relationship was permanent. The relationship could not

be terminated.14

A People

The mission of one couple to introduce G-d to the world, to bring all of creation to its Creator, and to turn a jungle into

the garden it was meant to be, was now being carried out methodically by their 3 million descendants.

The mission became a lifestyle.15 The unspoken love became a written scroll.16 The people became a People.17

The millions of children of Israel were now the one Children of Israel.18  

For decades, centuries, and millennia, the descendants of Abraham and Sara, the Children of Israel, carried on. The mission

never became easy, but it constantly progressed. Their message was fashionable at times, unfashionable at others. New

fashions were created that wished to make the original message old fashion. But the descendants, like their original

ancestors, were not intimidated by popular opinion, control or power. They did not fear persecution, and they weren't seduced

by common trends.

They remained committed to G-d and the mission.

Throughout time there were bumps in the road. The relationship faced challenges from within, and was under tremendous

pressure from without. But truth is eternal, and the relationship endured.

The people, the relationship, and the mission, still exist to this very day.

You might know these people as the Jews. But now you know the rest of the story.

Footnotes

    * 1. The story of Abraham and Sara is in Genesis chapters 12-25. See also Ezekiel 33:24 "Abraham was one". See also

Maimonidies laws of Idol Worship chapter 1.
    * 2. See Midrash Genesis Rabba 38:13. See also Maimonidies laws of Idol Worship 1:13
    * 3. See Genesis 21:33 for example. See also Talmud tractate Sotah 10a/b and Maimonidies laws of Idol Worship 1:12-14
    * 4. Genesis 15:5
    * 5. The story of Isaac is in Genesis chapters 21-28
    * 6. The story of Jacob is in Genesis 25-50
    * 7. The story of Jacob's children (12 sons and 1 daughter) is in Genesis 29-50
    * 8. Genesis 32:29 and 35:10
    * 9. Abraham's monotheistic tradition continued. See Maimonidies laws of Idop Worship 1:14-16
    * 10. From the birth of Isaac until the Exodus from Egypt was 400 years (see Rashi on Genesis15:13). At the time of the

Exodus there were over 600,000 men between the ages of 20 and 60, not including women, children, men outside that age group,

or Levites (see Numbers chapter 1).
    * 11. Exodus 19:3-6
    * 12. Exodus 19:8
    * 13. Otherwise known as The Sinai Story (the innaugaration of the Jewish people as a Holy Nation and the giving of the

Torah). See Exodus chapters 19-20
    * 14. Genesis 17:7. See also Deuteronomy chapters 29-30
    * 15. Judaism.
    * 16. The Torah.
    * 17. Known as "The Children of Israel", "The Israelites", "The Jews", and "The People of the Book".
    * 18. Over the years many have joined this family through a G-d given gift: "conversion". By means of proper conversion

one receives a new soul belonging to the family of Abraham, and s/he too becomes a descendant of Abraham and Sara.

http://www.askmoses.com/en/article/174, ... a-Jew.html
All peoples of the world know who they are—they're forthright about it. Koreans are Koreans, Norwegians are Norwegians, and

Hyphenated-Americans are Hyphenated-Americans.

But what are Jews? "Who—or what—am I?" is a question every Jew has asked at least once in his lifetime. And sadly, they have

reason to, because instead of definitions, they have doubt. Is being Jewish a race? Religion? Tradition? Ethnicity?

Nationality? Geographic origin? None of the above?

Here's what a Jew is: a Jew is a spiritual state of being. A Jew is any human being who has a Jewish soul, regardless of his

or her race, lifestyle or professed religion. This soul is possessed by any man or woman who was born to a Jewish mother or

has converted to Judaism according to the dictates of Jewish law.

    You could try as hard as you can to be just like your neighbors—you're still Jewish. You could "convert" to Christianity,

or run off to India to "become" Buddhist—you're still Jewish

You can be as hip as Jerry Seinfeld, as religious as Moses, as left-wing as Barbra Streisand or as conservative as your uncle

Irving—you're still Jewish. You could be an environmentalist, an industrialist, a fundamentalist—you're still Jewish. You

could try as hard as you can to be just like your neighbors—you're still Jewish. You could "convert" to Christianity, or run

off to India to "become" Buddhist—you're still Jewish.

You could even become an anti-Semite—you're still Jewish. (Shocking but true, Jews have done that too—ever hear of Bobby

Fischer?) You could be Caucasian, Hispanic, Irish, Norwegian, Hyphenated-American; whatever. No matter who you are or what

you do, if you've got that Jewish soul, you're Jewish. And nothing you do or decide to be can destroy that Jewish soul.1

See also Can you describe the Jewish soul?

Footnotes

    * 1. Talmud Tractate Sanhedrin 44a: "R. Abba b. Zabda said: Even though [the people] have sinned, they are still [called]

'Israel'. R. Abba said: Thus people say, A myrtle, though it stands among reeds, is still a myrtle, and it is so called."

http://www.askmoses.com/en/article/158, ... -Jews.html
You are absolutely right! Some of the most beautiful blessings and praises ever showered upon the Jews were uttered by

Balaam, the malicious anti-Semite who eagerly accepted Balak's invitation to curse the Jews: "G-d perceives no iniquity in

Jacob, and sees no perversity in Israel; the Lord, his God, is with him, and the friendship of the King is with him." "How

goodly are your tents, O Jacob, your dwelling places, O Israel!" The highlight of these blessings is the only clear prophecy

written in the Torah concerning the coming of Moshiach: "I see it, but not now, I look at him, but it isn't near.* A star has

issued from Jacob and a staff will come forth from Israel..."

Why couldn't these prophecies have been transmitted through Moses, the champion of the Jews? Instead we find that many of

Moses' prophecies are replete with rebukes and admonitions. It would seem that Moses and Balaam switched roles; Moses should

have showered us with blessings and honor, and Balaam should have been the mouthpiece for G-d's reprimands!

The Midrash says, "It would have been proper for the rebukes to emanate from the mouth of Balaam, and the blessings from the

mouth of Moses. However, if Balaam would have rebuked, the Jews would have [disregarded the rebukes,] saying, 'our foe is

rebuking us.' And if Moses would have blessed, the nations of the world would [disregard the blessings,] saying, 'the one who

loves them has blessed them.' Therefore, G-d said, 'Let Moses who loves them rebuke them, and let Balaam who detests them

bless them.'"

There is a compelling lesson to be taken from this. Often, we are inclined to chide another – a family member, acquaintance,

etc. – who has erred in his or her ways. We must always remember that the only legitimate admonition is one which derives

from love and care. For if the person accepting the reproach feels that the reproacher is speaking out of anger or self-

righteousness, the rebuke is futile and will accomplish no good. The verse says (Leviticus 19:17), "You shall not hate your

brother in your heart; you shall reprove your fellow." First be certain that you harbor no animosity in your heart, and then

you may chastise.

*Despite Balaam's remarkable blessings, the Midrash points out the stark difference between the words of Balaam the Jew-hater

and the prophecies of Isaiah, the Prophet of Redemption. While Balaam said, "not now, isn't near," Isaiah says (56:1), "Thus

says the Lord: Keep justice, and do righteousness, for soon my deliverance will come and My righteousness will be revealed."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... irade-MPs-

criticised-expenses-fiasco.html

The SM provides such a mechanism, which I actually discussed in the last section of the Appendix for Scientists in ([10], p.

515). This mechanism is the creation/destruction of baryon number by electroweak quantum tunneling. (Baryons are the heavy

particles made up of quarks. Examples are neutrons and protons.) In my book, I pointed out that this mechanism would be ideal

for propelling interstellar spacecraft, but I did not discuss its implications for the Higgs vacuum, a serious oversight on

my part. (An oversight which invalidates the second part of my Fifth Prediction on page 149 of [10].) If the SM is true—ALL

experiments conducted to date indicate that it is (e.g. [33] and [34], last full paragraph on p. 35)—then the net baryon

number observed in the universe must have been created in the early universe by this mechanism of electroweak quantum

tunneling. If the baryons were so created, then this process necessarily forces the Higgs field to be in a vacuum state that

is not its absolute vacuum. But if the baryons in the universe were to be annihilated by this process, say by the action of

intelligent life, then this would force the Higgs field toward its absolute vacuum, canceling the positive cosmological

constant, stopping the acceleration, and allowing the universe to collapse into the Omega Point. Conversely, if enough

baryons are not annihilated by this process, the positive cosmological constant will never be canceled, the universe will

expand forever, unitarity will be violated, and the Omega Point will never come into existence. Only if life makes use of

this process to annihilate baryons will the Omega Point come into existence.


Implications from string theory

If string theory is valid, it would seem to contradict the Omega Point Theory, since the Omega Point Theory requires the

existence of a cosmological singularity at the end of time. Whereas, according to string theory, singularities do not

actually exist because no material object can be compressed below the Planck length.[43] Prof. Tipler himself argues against

the validity of string theory.[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle
http://www.exisle.net/mb/lofiversion/in ... 29219.html

Baryons are "heavy" particles (fr. Grk baryos "heavy"] composed of three quarks, as opposed to leptons [fr Grk leptos

"light") like electrons and neutrinos, which are not made of subparticles, and mesons (fr. Grk mesos "middle"], which are ...

not relevant to this discussion, m'kay?

Protons/neutrons, at over 1876x the mass of an electron, are actually the lightest of the baryons (but are the only stable

ones on even a nanosecond scale). The charged lambda hyperon is by far the heaviest baryon I know at ~2240 Mev (vs ~938 Mev

for a proton or neutron or 0.501 MeV for an electron), so don't get carried away imagining ultra-exotic baryons the size of

planets. It just doesn't work that way.

As it turns out, our universe seems to have a large number of excess baryons (vs. their antiparticle counterparts, anti-

baryons), which is probably why we see so much matter in the universe around us, but so little of the 936 Mev-range gamma

rays that we'd expect from proton or neutron "matter-antimatter" annihilation in the border regions, if the universe were

composed of equal areas of matter and antimatter.

Indeed, the number of excess baryons seems to be conserved in our current stage of the universe's (broken symmetry)

development, going as far back as we can describe well with current physics theory (i.e. to a tiny fraction of a second after

the big bang. We only have glimpses of the physics before that, and our theories conflict). The "baryogenesis question" [why

is there more matter than antimatter] was, last I checked, still something of an issue in cosmology.

The number of baryons in the universe will also remain constant (until the big crunch [1], if our universe is closed) because

baryons/antibaryons can be created or destroyed in pairs. No known process cracks baryons into to their constituent quarks

and reassemble the quarks into a different number of baryons, and you can't change the qualrk number without using anti-

quarks)

Actually, It appears to be technically possible, but the process would have to climb an impossibly large energy potential.

Fortunately (or unfortunately) it may be possible for the baryons to "tunnel" through the potential energy barrier, through a

process similar to the quantum tunnelling that allows black holes to evaporate, per the work of (e.g.) Hawkins.
1. or the "Big Hug" as the trancers insist on referrring to it, since RHW's Coda

Once you can violate conservation of baryon number through electroweak tunneling (or any other mechanism), you open the door

to destroying matter, converting it to energy without any need for antimatter. You can see why that would be useful for space

travel.

This does seem to be possible. It appears that Baryon conservation isn't a 'strong conservation law' (like conservation of

energy) but a "weak conservation", like CPT conservation. Charge, parity and time turn out not to be conserved independently,

as you were taught in school, but they are conserved together: e.g. a "normal" negative electron travelling forward in time

is mathematically indistinguishable from a positive electron (positron, anti-electron) travelling backwards in time. One of

the shocking results of violating this conservation is: if parity isn't conserved, the universe will display directional

preferences -- "left- or right- handedness" -- and that is exactly what was observed in beta (slow) decay, which is a limited

but not entirely uncommon phenomenon in nature.


viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4431&p=17611&hilit=Ostrovsky#p17611

http://ziofascism.net/blog/?p=1115

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saskatchewan

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=5489&start=0

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 276198.ece

http://deathflag.com/viewtopic.php?f=4& ... ccadab2205

http://www.legassembly.sk.ca/bills/PDFs/bill-43.pdf

[mgt23]

http://theinfounderground.com/mgt2323/catch23.mp3

[rmstock]

nice show!  How's the Misses? She's not MOSSAD is she?

About the Reality Bomb. The theory of Frank J. Tipler, "Omega Point
Theory" etc. makes use of things like, anti-matter, black holes, and
concludes that destruction of matter creates energy...

Well Dark-matter is a hoax interpretation which comes forth straight
from Albert Einsteins "General" and "Special" relativity theories.  
There's a problem though, Albert Einstein was not a career physicist,
he was a Bern patent office clerk. Einstein, a Zionist .... , was
however into the theories of Madam Blavatsky, the Theosophical aspects  
of physics. He advised fellow physicists to get a copy of H. P.  
Blavatsky's "Secret Doctrine" and keep it on their desks.

That Tipler expresses his doubts on String Theory, comes forth, most
probably, from two master pieces written in 2006 and 2007, which,
without a shatter of a doubt, prove that String Theory is exactly what
it is : a Theory in name only, as String Theory is incapable to predict
real-world physical experiments, both in nano and macro scale :



The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next
 by Lee Smolin
 Paperback: 392 pages
 Publisher: Mariner Books; 1 edition (September 4, 2007)
 Language: English
 ISBN-10: 061891868X
 ISBN-13: 978-0618918683
 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... 25-1179808



Not Even Wrong,
The Failure of String Theory and the
Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics.
 by Peter Woit
 Paperback: 304 pages
 Publisher: Vintage Books; New Ed edition (June 26, 2007)
 Language: English
 ISBN-10: 0099488647
 ISBN-13: 978-0099488644
 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0099488647
 http://www.rbooks.co.uk/product.aspx?id=0099488647
 http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/

Here's whats wrong with the Jew Zionist dominated viewpoint of physics, which I posted on David Icke's
forum :

"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4916

I made a webpage of this at http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/

Here's some excerpts :
http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/dav ... hread1.php :

 The below email i sent to Prof McCanney:
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:52:13 +0200 (CEST)
 From: Robert M. Stockmann <stock@stokkie.net>
 To: James M. McCanney <jmcc@jmccanneyscience.com>
 Subject: Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine
 
 
 Dear Professor McCanney,
 
 With much delight i have worked through your latest book "Calculating
 Primes" by means of your brilliant and easy accessible DVD whiteboard
 presentation.
 
 At the end of the DVD a radio report is added, discussing things like
 repeatability in gathering physics measurement results, in patterns of
 prime numbers and inside todays scientific survey of the galaxies. As
 you state, with such astounding patterns and beauty in our surroundings
 on all scales from atomic, micro biology, snow flakes, nature and in
 space, todays atheists and accompanying scientific establishment view
 on this, is starting to look like that of science being deliberately
 buried in vague theories like "dark matter", "the big bang",
 "Darwinism" and as such resulting in the "capstone" philosophy of
 Humanism.
 
 I fully agree that these views are unsatisfactory regarding the hard
 facts and physics measurement results which clearly point time over
 time into a different direction where to search for a more logical
 explanation.
 
 Much of todays established scientific view on the universe is based on
 the work of Albert Einstein. But it is precisely his work, the
 Relativity theories, which today have embarked in complicated phenomena
 like, dark matter, black holes, Big Bang theories and much alike.
 Phenomena which are very hard to measure and are not backed up with
 scientific evidence. Moreover, the mathematical models which describe
 our universe can only survive by making such phenomena a mandatory add
 on. The word repeatability in this context has become a forgotten
 concept. Physics has become a insider only discipline where things like
 string theory have degraded it into a exotic math only cult.
 
 Only a year ago I wrote the following to a radio show host who had
 brought up some doubts around the work of Einstein :
 
 "I am a graduated physicist myself, and have never found any reasons
 or leads which could raise the slightest doubt over the physics
 publications by Albert Einstein. The fact that he was a Jew has
 nothing to do with his work as a physicist."
 
 But here's where i recently have changed 180 degrees in opinion.
 Mounting evidence has shown up which allows the conclusion that
 Einstein, the Bern patent office clerk, was hired to white wash the
 Physics and Science establishment...
 
 Albert Einstein, a Zionist no doubt, was highly awarded for his
 Relativity theories because he gave the scientific community of our
 Masonic/Illuminati elitist rulership a very brilliant way out of a very
 nasty problem which was posed during the 1890's and early 1900's. The
 Michelson Morrison experiment which could measure the speed of the
 aether using light rays and some mirrors turned out to become a total
 nightmare for the scientific priesthood.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson- ... experiment
 
 The Michelson Morrison experiments, carried out all across the globe
 proved one thing without a shatter of a doubt : the speed of the aether
 on our planet earth was zero, ALL in coexistence with numerous Bible
 verses which state that The Earth Is Motionless and is at the center of
 our geocentric planetary system, where the sun and moon are rotating
 around the earth and not like the heliocentric system which Copernicus,
 Kepler, Newton, Galileo and last but not least Einstein successfully
 have foisted upon the worlds.
 
 Why did Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Galileo and Einstein foist this
 heliocentric deception into mainstream science? Very simple, because
 they then as atheists (or even canaanites?) have discredited the Bible
 with its geocentric system on page zero, and next have a easy task
 promoting Darwinism, Humanism, The Big Bang etc.
 
 A week ago i stumbled across a almost vanished book from the website
 http://www.fixedearth.com, which has been put offline recently by the
 same people who have promoted Einsteins deceptive math curiosities.
 Last Wednesday Jun 6, 2007 i received that book :
 

 "The Earth is not Moving,
 Over 400 years of deception exposed!
 The bible told the truth all along."
 by Marshall Hall,
 Paperback: 328 pages
 Publisher: Fair Education Foundation Inc. Third Printing, (April 2005)
 ISBN-10: 0-932766-20-x
 http://web.archive.org/web/200512280....com/order.htm

 Order from:
 FEF, Inc.
 Box 866
 Cornelia, GA 30531
 Email: fefinc@hemc.net. On June 6 i received their book. Good service by the
 The Fair Education Foundation for sure. I recommend this book 1000%, as
 Marshall Hall proves without a shatter of a doubt that :
 
 The Earth is not Moving!!!!
 
 Please find attached scanned images of the cover and back of this book
 "The Earth is not Moving". Make sure to read the backside, as that will
 for most NASA insiders be enough evidence to start scratching behind
 their ears...
 
 Cheers,
 
 Robert
 --
 Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
 Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
 crashrecovery.org mailto:stock@stokkie.net">stock@stokkie.net

someone asked :

If this reality is holographic and is being projected by a technology/source/creator/us what have you can it move? Or does it just vibrate which gives us the feeling of moving? I'm thinking of Robert Monroe's experience of seeing the projector. It could be anything really.

Well a couple of together binded pieces of paper, i.e. a book,
 unfolding a new view on our planet earth and its planetary system,
 won't change our real world and planetary system. The only thing the
 book does is prove that the heliocentric model (the Copernicus/Kepler
 model where the earth rotates around its axis in 24 hours and rotates
 around the sun in 365 days) is a carefully crafted HOAX interpretation.
 The book claims with a shatter of a doubt that the earth does NOT
 rotate around its axis, in fact it stands still.
 
 To interprete our view and collected data from the Universe, one needs
 to know its reference point, i.e. the position, speed, orbit and axis
 rotation speed of the earth. Marshall Hall simply claims proof that the
 earth has no rotation around its axis. Next he observed that NASA uses
 a non-moving earth (no orbit and no rotation) inside its modeling to
 calculate the most precise data for envoy missions to the moon and mars.
 
 Its likewise not very difficult to see that if the earth does not move
 or rotate, the mathematics equations of the Relativity theories would
 simply become void, as the concept of Relativity becomes void, when
 explaining our measurement results from the Universe as collected here
 on planet earth......
 
 What Einstein deliberately did was to NEVER question the validity of the
 Copernicus/Kepler planetary model, i.e. moving and rotating earth. In
 fact Einstein and the Physics elite made carefully sure this question
 was never asked or published! But he was bold and brave enough to a)
 define a constant speed of light independent of ANY physical
 conditions, b) remove the concept of aether when it concerns light
 waves/particles . These two hypothetical starting points were never
 questioned by the Physics science establishment, despite the fact that
 the Maxwell's Equations could only work if there was a aether for
 light/electricity. Rest assure to mention that the Maxwell Equations
 are the ones most used inside Applied Physics and even Applied Science!
 
 The Physics elite went even sofar to support Einstein by accepting him
 to turn around the interpretation of the Michaelson Morley experiment.
 That is, brainwash the public that the speed of light is constant by
 design (We tell you so!) Why? Because Albert Einstein also declared as
 given fact that there is no such thing as aether for light waves, which
 was also accepted by the Physics elites with no questions asked.
 
 In fact, if you carefully look at 20th century Physics books, there is
 never ever a question posed which allows the possibility that the earth
 could simply be standing still, hence bypassing the most
 straightforward explanation of the Michaelson Morley experiments (the
 aether speed on earth is zero), and never ever even mention or hinting
 such a thing.
 
 Strangely enough somewhere in the 1920's Einstein suddenly sees some
 possible trouble, and quickly mentions that the concept of aether for
 light waves (or particles) cannot simply be abandoned, as then the
 Maxwell Equations would fall apart. What then follows are most
 complicated mathematical theories to explain more fine detailed
 phenomena in outer space, whilest silently sticking to the
 Copernicus/Kepler heliocentric system as starting point and never write
 science publications which could hint readers to the geocentric model.
 
 My question is very simple: was the Michaelson Morley experiment, which
 measures the speed of the aether, ever carried out on a fast moving
 Space-shuttle??
 
 Robert