Who were the “people of the book”?

[joeblow]

Who were the "people of the book"?      

http://www.daily.pk/world/middle-east/1 ... -book.html

Written by www.daily.pk  
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 02:08

"And there are, certainly, people among the Yahud and Nasara, those who believes in Allah and in that which has been revealed to you, and in that which has been revealed to them, humbling themselves before Allah. They don't sell the Verses of Allah for a little price, for them is a reward with their Lord. Surely, Allah is Swift in account," – Holy Qur'an 3:199

The Arabic words, 'Yahud' and 'Nasara' were translated into 'Jews' and 'Christians' by the first English translator of Holy Qur'an, Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall, the British convert, based on his religious and cultural background. His translation the words had no religious or historical basis. 'Yahud' in Islamic Arabic term means those people (Banu Israel), who follow the "Laws of Moses (Torah)" – which the great majority of Jews don't. Instead they follow Talmud, a book written by Rabbis during the 2nd century CE. Similarly, 'Nasara' in Islamic Arabic terms those people (Nazarene) who follow the Scripture (Injil) revealed to prophet Isa (Jesus) – while all Christians follow the teachings of St. Paul and four Gospel writers, who never met Jesus (as).

Bible confirms my theory (Revelation 2:9 - "I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a Synagogue of Satan."

Arthur Koestler ( an Ashkenazi Jew himself) in his famous book The Thirteenth Tribe  has also proven that the western Jews (Ashkenazi Jews occupying Palestine) are not the Israelites, but Turkic people who converted to Judaism during CE 740s.

Jesus' few dozen Apostles (disciples), who belonged to Israelite's Essenes order and spoke in Aramaic or Hebrew – used to call themselves 'Nazarenes (Nasara)', who after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, made their headquarters in Alexanderia (Egypt). These people followed the teachings of the Gospel of St. Barnabas, until Roman King Constantine destroyed them, together with their cononical Gospel (an Italian translation of which could be seen in theViennese Museum in Austria). St. Barnabas is described in Acts 11:24, "for he was a good man, full of the Holy Ghost and faith." It was Pope Gelasius, who issued a Bull (492 CE) – giving orders to destroy all copies of Gospel of Barnabas, which had survived the ravages of Constantine, and to replace it by the corrupted copies of the Constantine Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John of 325 CE.

Now, an Israeli historian, professor Shlomo Sand (Tel Aviv University), has claimed in his book titled "Matai ve'ech humtza ha'am hayehudi?" ("When and How the Jewish People Was Invented?"; that the present-day Jews are not descendents of the Hebrew tribes of Israel, exiled from the kingdoms of Judia or Israel by the Babylonians – but ancient pagans, mainly Berbers from North Africa, Arabs from south of Arabia and Turks from Khazar empire in Asia – who converted to Judaism between the fourth and eighth century CE. According to professor Sand, the Palestinians are probably the descended from Hebrews who embraced Islam or Christianity.

Israeli-born writer and musician, Gilad Atzmon, in his article The Wandering Who? elaborate further the myth of Jewishness as the community of the "People of Book" – "Astonishingly enough, in spite of the fact that Sand manages to dismantle the notion of 'Jewish people', crush the notion of 'Jewish collective past' and ridicule the Jewish chauvinist national impetus, his book is a best seller in Israel.  This fact alone may suggest that those who call themselves 'people of the book' are now starting to learn about the misleading and devastating philosophies and ideologies that made them into what Khalid Amayreh and many others regard as the "Nazis of our time".

It is an established fact that not a single Jewish history text had been written between the 1st century and early 19th century. The fact that Judaism is based on a religious historical myth may have something to do with it. An adequate scrutiny of the Jewish past was never a primary concern within the Rabbinical tradition. One of the reasons is probably the lack of a need of such a methodical effort. For the Jew who lived during ancient times and the Middle Ages, there was enough in the Bible to answer most relevant questions having to do with day-to-day life, Jewish meaning and fate. As Shlomo Sand puts it, "a secular chronological time was foreign to the 'Diaspora time' that was shaped by the anticipation for the coming of the Messiah".

Though most contemporary Jews are utterly convinced that their ancestors are the Biblical Israelites who happened to be exiled brutally by the Romans, truth must be said. Contemporary Jews have nothing to do with ancient Israelites, who have never been sent to exile because such an expulsion has never taken place. The Roman Exile is just another Jewish myth.

However, far more interesting is the logical outcome: If the people of Israel were not expelled, then the real descendants of the inhabitants of the Kingdom of Judah must be the Palestinians.

"No population remains pure over a period of thousands of years" says Sand. [12] "But the chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I are its descendents. The first Zionists, up until the Arab Revolt [1936-9], knew that there had been no exiling, and that the Palestinians were descended from the inhabitants of the land. They knew that farmers don't leave until they are expelled. Even Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, the second president of the State of Israel, wrote in 1929 that, 'the vast majority of the peasant farmers do not have their origins in the Arab conquerors, but rather, before then, in the Jewish farmers who were numerous and a majority in the building of the land.'"

One may wonder, if the Palestinians are the real Jews, who are those who insist upon calling themselves Jews?

Professor Sand leaves us with the inevitable conclusion. Contemporary Jews do not have a common origin and their Semitic origin is a myth.  Jews have no origin in Palestine whatsoever and therefore, their act of so-called 'return' to their 'promised land' must be realised as an invasion executed by a tribal-ideological clan.....

Saul Landau, a Jewish director of over forty films is so disgusted with Zionazi state that in an article titled How Israel Gives Jews a Bad Name, wrote: "Most Jews I know get little pleasure from the existence of Israel; just the opposite. They are disgusted by the behavior of their tribal kins towards Palestinians. This antipathy doesn't concern Israel's right to exist, a phony argument still maintained by hardline Zionists. Israel exist, period. Most of the world recognizes that. Anyone wanting to eliminate it belongs in the loony bin or prison....."

[Yammitor]

Nice find and great article. Good that he used the term "Zionazi state". Its good to see this in the mainstream press. I wish more articles like this would appear in the mainstream western sheople press.

I keep thinking of all that depleted uranium that was dumped on Gaza recently, the poor Palestinians just don't have time on their side  :x  :x

Only small one correction:
"One may wonder, if the Palestinians are the real Jews, who are those who insist upon calling themselves Jews"

Palestinians are not the real Jews, luckly for them, thats a real curse to be lumped in with that lot. (where is a puking green face EMO ??)

Should read

"One may wonder, if the Palestinians are the descendants of the real Judeans, who are those who insist upon calling themselves Jews"

[gurdgieff]

people of the book are from all the tribes of Israel.all the different races.
supremacists jews believe that the goyim are the offspring of the serpent satan.
the forbidden fruit. Eve in the garden of eden was tempted by not just an apple, it was the fruit of his loins, serpent satan.
kain and able were twins of different fathers kain was satans offspring and able was from adam
and three twin sisters.
Kain was the offspring of satan himself materialised into flesh. able was the first adamite but Kain Killed able kain was the first murderer.
Kain buried able trying to hide the body from God. And said to god when questioned about able "I am not my brothers keeper"I dunno were he is"This is were the tradition of burial comes from.
then it goes on .when adam reached 130 Or 230 years of age he had son callled shem.
and the jew believes that they are the offspring of shem and all other races are polluted and the offspring of satan.
The KKK also believe this cept its the other way around. The KKK call themeselves and all the white race Adamites.and believe the jew to be the offspring of cain.
Many people from all walks of life indipendantly have took it upon themselves to point the finger and say those people are the canites.
Jesus said ye shall know them by there fruit.
religion is our enemy. jesus said pray in a cupboard dont be a hypocrite. jesus was a very wise man.they turned his teachings into a religion.

[ehpg]

Al-Quraan al-Kareem 5. Surah Al-Ma'idah (The Table Spread with Food)


V.5:66. And if only they had acted according to the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), and what has (now) been sent down to them from their Lord (the Qur'ân), they would surely have gotten provision from above them and from underneath their feet. There are from among them people who are on the right course (i.e. they act on the revelation and believe in Prophet Muhammad  like 'Abdullâh bin Salâm ), but many of them do evil deeds.

V.5:82. Verily, you will find the strongest among men in enmity to the believers (Muslims) the Jews and those who are Al-Mushrikûn (see V.2:105), and you will find the nearest in love to the believers (Muslims) those who say: "We are Christians." That is because amongst them are priests and monks, and they are not proud.

[gurdgieff]

Islam and christianity ,whats the difference?.same shit same principles different prophet.
christians have better churches,especialy those vatican churches that most people dont even attend.once a week
muslims go 5 times a day thats 45 times a week.
So 25% of the world are muslims,Including amongst them 200 million chinese muslims.
1% of this world are jews and only 1% of these so called jews own over 90% of the world.

satan offered all the kingdoms of the world to jesus,but jesus refused.
somebody else took satan up on his offer.
Jesus said beware the synagogue of satan.They are the sons of the devil
somewere in the bible it says that all the kingdoms of the world will come under the government of Israel,
The future capital of israel is jerusalem.The 3rd temple of solomen wich they plan to build on the temple mount will be the headquarters of world government.

[joeblow]

1% of this world are jews and only 1% of these so called jews own over 90% of the world.

satan offered all the kingdoms of the world to jesus,but jesus refused.
somebody else took satan up on his offer.
Jesus said beware the synagogue of satan.They are the sons of the devil
somewere in the bible it says that all the kingdoms of the world will come under the government of Israel,
The future capital of israel is jerusalem.The 3rd temple of solomen wich they plan to build on the temple mount will be the headquarters of world government.

What exactly is your point, can you please elaborate? I believe that most people at TiU already would concur with your assessment that Jews are the "Shadowy Elites" that AJ always speaks of. I personally think that it is still important to show others what the globally targeted group's (Muslims) opinions are of the two other participants in this World War III Albert Pike scenario which we find ourselves in.