hello

[scott]

HI,
I'm new to the forums, just wanted to say hello.  I'm an American out of Chicago, I post under the name "fightingscott" in the torrent section of ConCen.  I don't tend to be very active in forums or message boards.  But, I wanted to sign up in case something comes up.  So that I'll have a place to ask questions or get information/research I might not be able to get elsewhere.

[Ognir]

Indeed Scott, I've noticed you on the tracker over there, and agreed if anything happens, let's say our Talmudic friends fire off a false flag event, ConCen forums will be talkin bollocks, No Planers, space beams etc

Anyway welcome abroad

[mastermg]

Welcome to TIU scott.

[scott]

thanks for welcoming me in.

this has been a learning process for me.  since 2004 i'd say i've been on my current path.  before 2001 i was an "independent thinker" with a bit too much reliance on corporate news.  and then after 2001 a bit too much reliance on well funded leftist or intellectual sources such as pacifica radio and npr.  a combination of things led me to my current understanding of the world. i can't break it down very well. i can't explain what i see to other people very well, and that's the problem.  

 i often cringe at the usage of the term "new world order."  it's an old term, it's ambiguous and the lexicon is constantly changing.  it could be called "global governance" now. whatever it's called  i still can't properly define it.

so that's one of the things that i'm after.  a better picture of the controllers and the controlling mechanism.

[pkm]

thanks for welcoming me in.

this has been a learning process for me.  since 2004 i'd say i've been on my current path.  before 2001 i was an "independent thinker" with a bit too much reliance on corporate news.  and then after 2001 a bit too much reliance on well funded leftist or intellectual sources such as pacifica radio and npr.  a combination of things led me to my current understanding of the world. i can't break it down very well. i can't explain what i see to other people very well, and that's the problem.  

 i often cringe at the usage of the term "new world order."  it's an old term, it's ambiguous and the lexicon is constantly changing.  it could be called "global governance" now. whatever it's called  i still can't properly define it.

so that's one of the things that i'm after.  a better picture of the controllers and the controlling mechanism.

Gotta agree there - Global Governance is alot more clear about the intentions of the whole thing! - Plus the politicians/beaurecrats use it so often the meaning gets crapped on- 'oh good the gov. order will save us from the anarchy' People think...