Karl Rahner - Neo Catholicism

[Anonymous]

Freemason for sure as expressed by his hand symbols









http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rahner

[Anonymous]

His philosophy was adopted and supported  in VAT II

A Critical Examination of the
The Theology of Karl Rahner

Atila Sinke Guimarães

http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkrevi ... Rahner.htm

An Exclusive Interview with Bishop Richard Williamson

http://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Socie ... n_2005.htm

Q: One, would you explain what you mean by the "New Religion" and, two, do you think Pope Benedict is consciously or willingly promoting the "New Religion"?

A: The "New Religion" starts from man and is centered on man. The "New Religion" starts from the proposition that God, and the idea of God, is too strange for modern man, and so, to get through to modern man, we must start from man. That's what's called from Karl Rahner the anthropological term, the "turn towards man." And Fr. Ratzinger, at the time of the Second Vatican Council, was closely tied to Karl Rahner, a close disciple. So, the young Joseph Ratzinger was soaked in this brand new theology. For instance, instead of saying that Jesus Christ is the Son of God from eternity who took a human nature, it [the New Religion] says that Jesus Christ is the man who was such a perfect man that he could be called the Son of God.

Q: So, things are too far gone in the "New Religion"? What can Catholics do?

A: Well, what is needed? When John Paul I became Pope, there were various indications he was beginning to understand, although he had followed the Council, and even changed his mind about religious liberty because of the Council. He accepted the Council on religious liberty. He followed the movement, which is what many bishops did. He was a normal, decent cardinal who followed the movement. Then, when he became Pope, when he was in the hot seat, it looks as though the pressures came to bear upon him, as they must now be bearing upon Cardinal Ratzinger. Cardinal Ratzinger must now be going through a firestorm.

The indications are that Pope John Paul I was beginning to understand what the score was. He wanted to get rid of some high-ranking Freemasons in the Vatican. And they got to him before he could get to them. It is very likely he was assassinated—again, there are plenty of indications of this. Of course, the Vatican hushed it all up, but enough truth got out to indicate that John Paul I was likely assassinated. So, there's an example of a man from whom we might not have expected very much. But when he became Pope, when he got in the hot seat, he began to get the picture and he had the courage to start to act. And that was enough for him to be martyred.

[hurensohn]

I don't understand the difference between roman catholicism, neo or otherwise with freemasonry. It's the same faith packed into different containers.

[Wimpy]

John Savage, do you have a play book illustrating Freemason hand signals?

I ask because I know that I'm not a Mason yet I've used similar hand positions on many occasions.  Could it be that I'm a Mason, perhaps due to some MKULTRA programming, and not be aware of it?

Years ago my Manager began talking about Free Masonry and how he attended meetings etc.  Not knowing anything about the subject I asked him several questions including how one might go about joining such an organization.  He replied, "you can't, your a Catholic".  Nuff said.

[Anonymous]

John Savage, do you have a play book illustrating Freemason hand signals?

I ask because I know that I'm not a Mason yet I've used similar hand positions on many occasions.  Could it be that I'm a Mason, perhaps due to some MKULTRA programming, and not be aware of it?

Years ago my Manager began talking about Free Masonry and how he attended meetings etc.  Not knowing anything about the subject I asked him several questions including how one might go about joining such an organization.  He replied, "you can't, your a Catholic".  Nuff said.

thanks for the info but you missed the point

[Anonymous]

The first of the six neo-modernists is a French philosopher living from 1861 to 1949 whose name will be known to very few readers, yet without whom there would have been no Vatican Two: Maurice Blondel.






http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Blondel

Finally Si Si No No quotes Blondel changing the very definition of truth. Instead of the classical definition "the matching of mind and reality" which Blondel dismisses as "chimerical," or unreal – presumably Blondel like most moderns held the mind to be incapable of attaining reality – Blondel's definition is "the real matching of mind and life," a definition leaving room for the truth to be in continual movement,. with nothing ever determined or fixed. Hence a shifting truth, an evolving Faith, a "living Tradition" which will enable Archbishop Lefebvre's "fixist Tradition" to be condemned. Truth evolves.

[rmstock]

what a load of bollocks...

you better take care NOT to "emit" the Satan El-Diablo
handsign with your left hand when typing CNTRL-ALT-DEL
on a windows computer when trying to login.