The formation of the corpration known as the USA in 1871

[high_treason]

http://www.republicoflakotah.com/?p=1193

If you have any sense, READ THIS NOW!
February 1, 2009 by admin
The USA Isn't a Country, It's a Corporation!
January 31, 2009
Note from Russell: The following article is one of the important reasons the Republic of Lakotah was re-born. It is also one of the main reasons why we welcome all freedom workers to Lakotah. Lakotah is a base from which we can spread the Truth and work towards reclaiming our Freedoms in our Country, and yours! I have heart-felt thanks to Lisa Guliani and her allies (lakotah in Lakotah language) for this very succinct article.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." –Preamble of the original "organic" Constitution.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness." –Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776.

Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, "We are not free." In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time.

We celebrate this day in honor of our "independence". We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song –but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained –or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn't have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true.

Don't point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth –what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either.

To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War. We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is "America" –only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a "free" people or not.

So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.
The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt –weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate back room players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers –(in those days, the Rothschild's of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America."

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization –an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me –and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as:

1. chief or highest; supreme.

2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others.

3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" –the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign –remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" –that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don't.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia –encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does.

You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses –not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this??

When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government –the corporate body of the death-mongers –The Controllers.

With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion –all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain –and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works –and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law –better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!

Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us –as in the case with the illegal income tax –among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.

The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance.

Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you –at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?

I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.

The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the ass for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are.

With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.

Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster –and restore our Constitutional Republic.

In an upcoming article, we'll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became "property" of the corporation and enslaved by our silence.

I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true –not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.

Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all –pray –that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot –come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy –the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?

Something to think about –it's called freedom.
My heartfelt thanks goes out to the following people for their gracious and generous assistance in researching this subject: Ken S. of American Revolution II Online News, Paul Walker of RMN News, Bob Taft, Stanooch, and Willy Whitten –true Patriots, one and all.

[§N9sh2bj]

I think the original debt of the East India company, carried over into the U.S., was paid off or closed out in 1999 Nov 6th. If you wanted to redirect the funds of your BC after that point you could. Winston (Shrout) began doing that in 2000. He mentions something about how countries can only be in bankruptcy for 70 years, and then reorganize but only 3 times, for a total of 210 years. Mentions a book called '1491'.

[targa2]

" It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia –encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does. "


This is not true.  It has gained jurisdiction  by getting "citizens " to volunteer for a privilege , or benefit.  By doing so it gains jurisdiction over the subject.  Just something as trivial as using " free " postal service via an abbreviated ZIP code draws one in to a contractual benefit.  This may be hard to believe but it is more dangerous not to believe it.  These are all traps to gain jurisdiction.  Unless you are aware of them it is easy to fall in to one or more of them.

Using checks ,or any other "bill of exchange " is considered a benefit. By doing so ,one gets the potential benefit of a redress of grievances in a commercial court.  One more way to gain jurisdiction.

The United States ( Washington 10 Sq mile enclave ) is a one level legislative democracy whose sole purpose is to reorganize the bankruptcy of the former united States of America which happened in 1933 and was codified in to Public Policy in 1938 with the Supreme Court decision  Erie Railroad vs Tompkins case.

[mobes]

The United States ( Washington 10 Sq mile enclave ) is a one level legislative democracy whose sole purpose is to reorganize the bankruptcy of the former united States of America which happened in 1933 and was codified in to Public Policy in 1938 with the Supreme Court decision Erie Railroad vs Tompkins case.

In effect, the result of that case was - WHERE THERE IS NO CONTRACT, THERE IS NO CASE.

[targa2]

That is about the size of it.  It merged law and equity.  All courts are now operating on the Law Merchant which is international , summary judgment based Admiralty/ Equity law. Admiralty is Equity.Civil law with criminal punishment for non-performance of an obligation.  That's why there are criminal punishments for " willful failure to file an income tax return ".  Has nobody ever asked how you can be criminalized for NOT doing something ?

There is no federal common law.  It is all commercial.  people are recently talking about the US going bankrupt.  It has been operating in bankruptcy since 1933.  Read Howard Freeman  " the UCC Connection "

http://autarchic.tripod.com/files/ucc.html

[hurensohn]

There is no federal common law. It is all commercial. people are recently talking about the US going bankrupt. It has been operating in bankruptcy since 1933. Read Howard Freeman " the UCC Connection "

True, but the supreme court also said that the bankrupcy only applies to the corporation "UNITED STATES". In this compromise verdict, also the whole notion of "federal co-operativism" was created. One possible reason why the supreme court diden't simply nullify the whole recivership as fraudulent is that FDR and his cronies were trying to stack the court, the justices tried to warn the people that FDR was tampernig with the judiciary but not enough people listened.

I think that if you look hard enough in the UCC you'll find the codified references to exemptions of the above mentioned nature.

[targa2]

Interesting.  Can you remember off hand what sec of the code ?  I know that's a tall order to remember all these specifics but I thought I would ask.

I would assume that the court has no ability to set aside the bankruptcy since that would be " practicing law from the bench ".  I the book Invisible Contracts, Mercier said the judges consider themselves in a  " between a rock and a hard place " scenario when they make the decisions they do regarding these adhesion contracts.

The more I research, the more I realize that they have covered every contingency within the law ,to protect the State and the private interests that manipulate it behind the scenes.

We live in a slave colony.

[hurensohn]

Well, the court had in essence two choices:

1) Invalidate the Federal Reserve Act on basis of fraud (or general larceny), or sack the entire act on basis of not having delegated powers to allow a private entity to operate "on land", claiming letters of marque (IRS has one) is for High Seas only.

2) Correctly say that just because a corporation (The United States) is bankrupted it does not mean that third parties are liable in their "reconstruction" agreement. In essence "keep your cancer to yourselves" (Which they also did)

And on the UCC exemptions, I'm myself looking for them since I've heard that they can quite successfully be used against anyone that operates from the "federal" Article I section 8 jurisdiction. But it's nothing that a good old common law writ can't do and the aim is to abate them so send them a writ of abatement. (I have no idea of how they'd work in Canada nor the UK, they've prolly abolished the writ [Which the federal government can't do, since they themselves say that there is no federal common law])

PS. Look the doctrine up in a law dictionary and not the http://www.ZionPedia.dis


4.-2. Relating to the person of the plaintiff. (1.) The defendant may plead to the person of the plaintiff that there never was any such person in rerum natura.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Abatement

Back to the I'm not JOHN DICKWAD, my true name his John Dickwad, a natural person.

Another possibility is simply not to show up, and when the "judge" issue an illegal and unlawful bench warrant, you can sue or charge him for doing so. Usually they don't like their lack of public registered bond as real judges need to have to be an issue. One could write back and say, I'm not intrerested in your product and I don't buy Tupperware neither.

[targa2]

Actually, a natural person is another fiction.  So is a human being.  Only a man is not a fiction.

[hurensohn]

One would need to sewer all the volontary contractual ties to the federal government though.

[targa2]

That is correct.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Caught up with this recently... Great analysis!

[hurensohn]

An article III court:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... onal_Trade

and it's about the only one around, the supreme court shut down it's 2nd floor court room during 1930. Rumour says that it's still maintained, with chairs, tables and the real flag of the United States, and not some yellow striped rag.

More information about different types of federal courts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_III_court

[§N9sh2bj]

One in Hawaii, one in New York, and one in Philadelphia that does not routinely convene.

[hurensohn]

Sir, would you perhaps have an adresses to those courts, so I can mail some FOIA requests regarding their cases, verdicts, deliberations etc. all the shit the clerk should record? I suppose they could be found in the budget, along with the defense appropritations act of 1971 that states USAMRID to create a retrovirus to be used race specifically. And it even says that on the front page. It even calls it "AIDS" on the same frontpage. The funny part is that if you post a link to the pdf file on "patriot" forums, you just get banned, well yidd yadd I guess.

[evanlong]

It has gained jurisdiction  by getting "citizens " to volunteer for a privilege , or benefit.  By doing so it gains jurisdiction over the subject.  Just something as trivial as using " free " postal service via an abbreviated ZIP code draws one in to a contractual benefit.

What is the contract and where are its terms?

[sullivan]

It has gained jurisdiction  by getting "citizens " to volunteer for a privilege , or benefit.  By doing so it gains jurisdiction over the subject.  Just something as trivial as using " free " postal service via an abbreviated ZIP code draws one in to a contractual benefit.

What is the contract and where are its terms?

Good question. As with all such specious "contracts" there won't be a contract, there won't be the signatures of the contracting parties. Anyway, the postal service is not free. The sender has to pay to have mail delivered to the destination.

[hurensohn]

Well a zip code is the federal governments designation for one of it's insular possetions, if you claim you live in one, them they gotcha.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_jurisdiction

[evanlong]

Well a zip code is the federal governments designation for one of it's insular possetions, if you claim you live in one, them they gotcha.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_jurisdiction

I don't see anything about a zip code on that page.

[§N9sh2bj]

It is my understanding using ZIP codes puts mail in the jurisdiction of the USA or one of it's sub-corporations (such as Local, County, State and other such corporate Courts, banks really).

An example of not using a ZIP-code might be:

Private
c/o StreetNameNoAbbreviations (no St. Ave. or other abbr.), house number 123
Anytown, FullStateName
non-Domestic, without the U.S.

One could also send the mail via Registered mail, which puts the post in international jurisdiction. Those numbers are unique, and the same format used by all other post offices headquartered in Switzerland, like the united states post office is.

There is a difference between using a registered mail number to send a post to a destination in the geographic fourty-eight states, and 'internationally', say one of the provinces of canada. That is: postage. The letter is in international 'waters', regardless, international jurisdiction I suppose.

If letters are sent according to the format above, without registered mail from within geographic locations of the fourty-eight states, the postage is 2 cents for a half-ounce, and 4 cents per ounce. When the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE took over the assets and liabilities of the united states post office (capitalization for clarity), that was one of the liabilities taken over.

If you are concerned about not using a zip code, some people say using [Near 12345] at the bottom might help. Dunno. Putting stuff in brackets -four corners or a box- is not hard and fast, I think. I think it's just a Styles-manual suggestion, although it is used often.

The easiest way to resolve your 'ZIP-code' question, is to do it yourself, privately and quietly.

Use full words - no abbreviations - everywhere on the postal location. Except for the abbreviation U.S., so I've been told, as that is property of the corporation. One suggestion could be using UNITED STATES instead of U.S..
Could use a given christian name, like:
John-Doe
c/o Smith
...
...
Play with the variations, keep the ZIP-code off, and keep the 'non-Domestic, without the U.S.' on or near the bottom.