David Pidcock critique

[AntiPharisee]

1. Supposedly the holy book that he follows could give the specific name(s) of the
important player or players (like Hitler) in prophecies/major events THAT HAVE ALREADY OCCURRED,
but when asked by DBS, "who's the next one" could not give a specific name
(only some garbled version of 'messiah') but rest assured
will give the specific name AFTER THE EVENT HAS ALREADY OCCURRED.

2. He says Jews were the "chosen ones" and "people of the book(Torah)".

That's not what it says here:

Thesis #36: The Jews Did Not Write the Torah, Nor Is It About Them

You can search the Pentateuch (First Five Books of Moses) and you will not find the word 'Jew' in any of those books. The reason for that omission is because none of the Old Testament Patriarchs were Jews. Most people assume that the word 'Jew' derives from the word 'Judah,' but that is only partially true. Since the Old Testament Scribes and Prophets were Israelites and Judahites, not Jews, we find that they practiced the Law of Moses...or they tried to and often failed; but the Jewish people have NEVER practiced the Law of Moses.

As Jesus Himself told us, and as true history has demonstrated, the Jews have always practiced their own traditions, which NEVER were the same as the Mosaic tradition. Rabbinical claims to authorship of the Old Testament are deceptive. The word 'Jew' properly derives from the word 'Ioudaios,' the Greek version of 'Judean.' The Jewish people descend from Idumea, an Edomite nation that was incorporated into Judea starting around 150 BC under King John Hyrcanus. This amalgamation of two separate and distinct peoples was continued under "King" Herod, who was a non-Israelite Edomite of Idumea. From such simple, indisputable ethnic facts, it is clear that the Pharisees and their people were outsiders, interlopers who brought THEIR Babylonian traditions with them from Idumea, gradually ALTERING the Mosaic Law and converting it into Judaism. Under Herod's authority, weaseled their way into the priesthood and began inserting their traditions into the Mosaic Law. Thus, Judaism was GRAFTED ONTO AND INTO the Law of Moses in order to displace it.

Every other historian and Bible scholar, with the exception of yours truly, Eli James, falsely believes and teaches, along with the rabbis, that the Idumeans CONVERTED to Judaism. That is NOT what happened. As I have been trying to explain, Judaism did not exist before the rabbis subverted Mosaism. The Idumeans did NOT convert to Judaism; they usurped authority over Mosaism and corrupted it into Judaism. It is very important to understand that Judaism was NEVER practiced by the Levitical priesthood. That is a historical fallacy. They practiced the Mosaic Law. It was the Pharisees who invented Judaism during the days of Hyrcanus and Herod. Thus, ALL historical references to Judaism existing before this time are ANACHRONISTIC.

Of course the rabbis, in order to provide themselves with an air of biblical legitimacy, want you to believe that they are just continuing in the Levitical tradition; but that is not the case. The rabbis aren't going to explain to you what I have just said, because it proves that Judaism's supposed origin in the Old Testament is fake.

Thus, the Jewish CLAIM that they are the inheritors and custodians of the Law of Moses is PURE FABRICATION. It is the world's longest-running hoax. It is a case of Satan pretending to be a follower of Moses. Quite simply, they have claimed the Torah in order to destroy it.

JUDAISM, ITSELF, IS THE MOST GIGANTIC HOAX OF ALL TIME. It is religious theater, par excellance.

The Jewish People Are NOT of Judah.

In ALL INSTANCES of the occurrence of the word 'Jew' in the Old Testament, the Hebrew source word is 'Judah,' not 'Jew.' There is no justification for translating the Hebrew word 'Judah' for the modern word 'Jew.' The modern word, 'Jew,' never did, nor does it today, designate the same ethnicity that the Old Testament word 'Judah' does. The word 'Judah' signifies the Tribe of Judah exclusively, along with their descendants. The ONLY WAY you can be a Judahite is to be a pure-bred descendant of the Tribe of Judah. Deut. 23:2 clearly tells us that NO MONGRELS will be accepted in the congregation of Yahweh, thus Jews are automatically excluded. The word translated there as "bastard" (mamzer) has a Hebrew root meaning of "mongrel," which means a race-mixed person. No other race or ethnicity can become Judahites. Thus, we have a non-Judahite people impersonating and claiming the authority and inheritance of Judah.

The rabbis are well aware of what a mamzer is, but they are very much hoping you will never enquire as to the meaning and significance of that word, for no mamzer can ever be a member of the congregation of Yahweh. (Deut. 23:2)

This explains why Rev. 2:9 and 3:9 condemns them as "those who say they are Jews [Judah], and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan." (Rev. 2:9)

The Revised English Bible translates it thus:

"I know how you are slandered by those who claim to be Jews [Judah] but are not; they are really a synagogue of Satan." (Rev. 2:9)

Think about it. Who is being slandered by a false claim? Are there any non-Jews who claim to be Jews? Are there any non-Jews clamoring to be known as Jews? Not hardly! Even the Christian Zionists prefer to be thought of as "Christians." In the New Testament, the English word 'Jew' can be translated from the Greek 'Iouda,' meaning "Judahite," or from the Greek 'Ioudaios,' meaning "Judean."

WE know for a fact that the Idumeans have been pretending to be Judahites. No one is trying to impersonate the Judeans; and no one is trying to impersonate Jews. So the CORRECT TRANSLATION OF Rev. 2:9 is "those who say they are JUDAH but are not; they are really the Synagogue of Satan."

Now, let's read Rev. 3:9, understanding who is impersonating whom:

"Behold, I will make them of the synagog of Satan [which group still refers themselves as a "synagogue"?], which say they are JUDAH, and are not, but do lie [for we know they are really Edomites from Idumea!]; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

Now, dear Christian, this is JESUS CHRIST speaking. Whom does He love? Christians or Jews? The whole of the New Testament is the record of His contempt for the Jews and their traditions. And it is also a historical fact that the Jews have worshipped before the altars of Christian churches – although most of them falsely converting – in order to ingratiate themselves to the Christians. And there is simply no doubt that all Jews KNOW that Jesus loves His sheep, the Christians!!!

Make sense? Do you know of anyone trying to impersonate the Jewish people? But we have definitely identified the Idumeans who have always been and are still trying to impersonate Judah.

True Judah and True Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples, have been slandered by the Impostor for the last 2,000 years. The time has come for an end to this impersonation and slander.

"Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall set you free." (John 8:32.)
More:
http://www.anglo-saxonisrael.com/docOth ... heses.html

3. Discredited the accuracy of his worldview by insinuating that a certain event occurred, that
has now been revealed to be a hoax, lie and deception. And 100's of millions
of people know this now but not Mr. Expert!?!?!?

4. Did not bring up this subject:
A REAL HOLOCAUST OF OVER SIX MILLION GERMAN CHRISTIAN CIVILIANS
as a result of The First SCHMIKLE-Engineered World War.
S = Serpent Seed
C = Cananite
H = Hittite
M = Mongol
I = Idumaean
K = Khazar
L = Lewes
E = Edomite

5. DBS constantly has David Pidcock on his show giving his Koran views,
but very disappointingly rejected Kevin Craig's offering to do an interview
(probably wouldn't do one now). Yet Kevin Craig has, IMHO, the most
correct and best interpretation of the Christian Holy Bible out of
anybody in the world, and that also by a factor of ten. See here:
 http://vftonline.org/xmaspiracy/xmusfaq.htm

[LordLindsey]

I called-in to Mike Piper last night *Tuesday night* and confronted him on a couple of important issues--Mark Glenn's dismissal by Tucker the fucker and the end of The Liberty Hour AND gave a plug to TIU.  Mike answered directly my points to my satisfaction...now on to my point.

I want to know what the Hell happened to the second part of the Kaminski interview with Daryl.  NO ONE has given a straight answer about this important issue because something obviously happened for the second part not to have been published, and I want to know what happened.  I will confront Mike about the Hitler and other Nazi issues that are a problem for many TIU members later, as I told him that I would last night, but for now I want a straight answer about the Kaminski interview from Daryl.  Daryl, I love most of what you do, a lot of the Pidcock stuff notwithstanding, but I am very troubled by this Kaminski situation.  Please either post the second part or explain what happened to have it kept from the listeners.

LINDSEY

[Anonymous]

There is no part two it ended because my battery powered recorder failed. Please stop looking for problems where there aren't any.

[LordLindsey]

Look, I'm not looking for problems because Kaminski was creating his own problems saying that there were no planes that hit the towers!   :lol:  :lol: ALL OF US here at TIU had assumed that the disinfo roll kept going on and that was why Part 2 was never posted, but now we all know what happened.  I am extremely disappointed at Kaminski's bullshit in the interview, but Daryl, I am grateful that he showed himself to be a real "no-planer" and that he is damaged goods.

LINDSEY

[thirdeyewise]

the guy might actually believe it, who knows. he does sometimes have some very good information. take the good, ditch the BS.
but that only works if the good vs BS ratio favors the good by say 80/20, in the case of someone like HufSHIT you don't get that ratio!

[§N9sh2bj]

There is no part two it ended because my battery powered recorder failed. Please stop looking for problems where there aren't any.

Daryl's statement is right. Creating controversy where there is none, is the way of suckers and debtors.

Besides, if John thinks no planes hit the buildings - between September Clues and that other better video I saw which pulls from the raw footage, at http://911taboo.net/ - I believe there are enough images of planes impossibly melting into the towers, and 'evidence' videos all seemingly produced by people with CGI skills and ties to the funny-handshake crew etc, to warrant the point. However, unlike some knuckleheads on here, I'm not going to call someone an operative jew about planes/no planes or get into a dispute, their presence just don't matter that much. It's a detail by now, hardly something to pull people doing solid articles and work, out on the carpet at this time.

The time has come to be men about these things. If David is not legitimately pushing disinfo and sounding like a whiny jew (i.e. Eric), let it go. You should be more concerned about piling up ammo than typing on the computer. Or getting a food dehydrator. Or getting some silver 1-ounce .999 coins while the ratio is all out of balance with gold. I hear the U.S. Mint has cut all production down to concentrate on 1-ounce bullion coins. Hmm.

Get close to your family, if they haven't been jew-dacized. Some, are unreachable. Make one or put yourself into shape of being a rightful husband, father, or if you're a woman, mother. The other half will be drawn towards your right living. So if you're frustrated with it so far, it's not them; you're doing something wrong.

But drop attacks on people who are just a bit astray. Eric already did the divide and conquer thing, and it gets old after awhile.