What we are; Who we are.

[§N9sh2bj]

Pro-mankind, pro-gentile, pro-germane, in the family of man. Pro-integrity, pro-truth, pro-fortitude, pro-resolve.

Og had posted the by-line 'anti-zionist thinktank' in the 'We are back and moving' post, and I thought it was better, to define who we are, rather than who we are not. Otherwise, we will allow ourselves to be defined by our enemies, regardless of whether we 'love them as our friends'.

[kolnidre]

Pro-mankind, pro-gentile, pro-germane, in the family of man. Pro-integrity, pro-truth, pro-fortitude, pro-resolve.

Og had posted the by-line 'anti-zionist thinktank' in the 'We are back and moving' post, and I thought it was better, to define who we are, rather than who we are not. Otherwise, we will allow ourselves to be defined by our enemies, regardless of whether we 'love them as our friends'.

BRAVO!

I wholeheartedly agree. The more I reflect on our current predicament the more it comes down to one question: are you pro-humanity or not? Either you believe in the human race or you undermine and defile it.

With so many dimwitted animals acting out merely their carnal desires all around it's easy to lose faith and even want to just cull the herd like the elite, but that ain't right. I get so pissed off and frustrated because I know we are capable of so much better.

[§N9sh2bj]

Got to be careful; the lawful definition of 'human' is swine. I have it somewhere and I keep meaning to post it. These words have not changed meaning any in the last couple of hundred years; the only thing which has changed is the so-called 'zionist masters' have taken over all establishments, feeding the goyim a new language, so we call each other 'swine' instead of men.

[joeblow]

For people wanting clarification:

human being See MONSTER.
—Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930)

monster A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.
—Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930)

I have been into conspiracies for 20 years and, like many of you, have an extremely negative view of anyone who discusses Uniform Commercial Code (because of all the fucking stupid PAYTRIOTARDS who, as usual, ruined the research by their consistent bullshit behavior).

I would highly recommend people to give it another chance, I did a show where I interviewed someone who was an excellent proponent of the new crop of Legal Research:

Check out this thread to see the show viewtopic.php?f=38&t=8220

[Free Truth]

Pro-semite

Pro-freedom

Pro-justice

[mgt23]

there is only one. pro survival of the truth.

[§N9sh2bj]

Magic the Gathering: I could not see what you wrote initially. I don't care for 'death' themes, finding them to be put out by those who believe in things which are not of life. Their dress is as though they worship the actions, thoughts and deeds of death. As though they find no value in life, as do the members of the organized criminals who carry out tasks as merchants of death. As you maintain this appearance in your avatar and sig, I wonder if you maintain this perspective? Clicking on 'Display this post' it says 'There can only be one. Pro survival of the truth.'


We are all of a different perspective, so from that perspective each has their own truth, is that right?

Rather than suggesting truth is arbitrary, however, the essential issue is your statement is only true from your own perspective. What do you believe?

Whether your natural perspective survives, governed by natural law which created you, is irrelevant to comment on; your truth, otherwise known as natural perspective, always does. What I have found is when one allows fear, a private matter, to cloud out the natural truth which exists within, no external force can be blamed. It is an inside job, and we are the most perfidious masters.

To any member reading this, what is your understanding in how it relates to what we are or who we are?




---
'Pro-Think (TM)'  :lol: