Watch! Can you see what I see?

Started by Travis, October 29, 2009, 12:39:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Travis

I anti-Zionist fellows. Please watch these trailers and see if you can see what I see... It appears these films are using metaphors to describe what has happened, what do you think?

[youtube:1jaxk4f1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L86AAGZ9BBg[/youtube]1jaxk4f1]

[youtube:1jaxk4f1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouZkkIsLiNg[/youtube]1jaxk4f1]

Wimpy

"They Live" has been around the Anti-Zio circles a while now and maybe it's time to organize group viewings with analogous Zionism discussions with those new to the subject.  The metaphors are so straight forward that linking the Zio subject would be an effortless affair (and entertaining).

"The Thing" in my opinion is great entertainment but a smooth transition to the Zio topic is more elaborate.  Unlike "They Live", where a fight ensues while attempting to get just one person to wear the glasses, a classic struggle we have all experienced, "The Thing" has nothing to offer but suspicion and fear as to whom might be infected.  The lines are hazy.  But, PUT ON THE F--ING GLASSES is concise and the results are immediate and tangible if only you "LOOK".

Nice reminder Travis.
I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a Hamburger today.

Travis

Quote from: "Wimpy""They Live" has been around the Anti-Zio circles a while now and maybe it's time to organize group viewings with analogous Zionism discussions with those new to the subject.  The metaphors are so straight forward that linking the Zio subject would be an effortless affair (and entertaining).

"The Thing" in my opinion is great entertainment but a smooth transition to the Zio topic is more elaborate.  Unlike "They Live", where a fight ensues while attempting to get just one person to wear the glasses, a classic struggle we have all experienced, "The Thing" has nothing to offer but suspicion and fear as to whom might be infected.  The lines are hazy.  But, PUT ON THE F--ING GLASSES is concise and the results are immediate and tangible if only you "LOOK".

Nice reminder Travis.

I appreciate your analysis. Also I agree 'they live' is more straight forward and to an extent, on reflection, explicit in its meaning. However, the thing is perhaps an explanation of the Zionist character. It is hidden and does not make its self known and it feeds of its victim.

Father Brown

Very interesting clips, and yes I believe I do see what you see.

To get a little more specific, I would like to comment on the part in They were the protaganist puts on his glasses and sees the word "OBEY" on the billboard. I've not seen the movie, only similar clips in The Arrivals.

I don't think we should interpret this as some kind of subliminal message being created by the word, "OBEY". That is too silly. How can marks creating letters to depict a word cause us to submit? No, it is something in the picture and words on the billboard that cause us to "OBEY" our masters. Things that are seen, but not thought through, therefore they have an effect on the soul or psyche that is below the surface for most everyone who views it.

And it is somthing internal, within us, that is to be "OBEYED". An appetite, if you will, that "THEY" have the ability to provide you with the means to fill that void. Of course "THEY" also help to perpetuate and create that void as well. The monetary reward from the sale of that item is simply the most obvious thing they receive from you. At the highest level, it is simply a matter of our pride being satisfied by our idolatry. It may be a billboard for a BMW, or riches vis a vis Financial Planning, but let's consider the easiest, and sometimes hardest to see, that of sexual idolatry.

Let's suppose this would be an ad for a Chanel, or Versace, or some high end fashion house with a very elegant woman dressed in very rich and flashy looking clothes. She is certainly not slutty or cheap looking, but the ideal. However, men will certainly find the ability to lust after her, and women will find the ability to want to be like her.

We are talking about bondage to sin here. Lust, Greed, Concupiscense, Covetousness, Idolatry, Pride, Envy, Gluttony, etc. That is what "OBEY" means. Obey your sinful desires. At one level it says its OK to do so, because this is the ideal here on earth. Everybody's doing it. Surely you will not die!

So now let's look at the financial control that results from "OBEYING" this message. Men might be then tempted to pick up a Playboy or Penthouse, look at internet Pornography, etc. Women, most of whom cannot afford the high end products in my example, might buy a new lipstick, or other make-up. Maybe a new outfit that can't compete with the lady on the board, but something that makes her feel better about herself. So even if this billboard does not sell the actual item, it is always working in concert with selling something. You can almost here these pigs saying, "step up folks, I've got a huge supply". It's an archetype.

Eventually this leads to permissiveness, more sinfulness, and a never ending vicious circle of carnal desire. Carnal meaning of mortal appetites of the flesh. This includes worship of the body and eating, drinking, smoking, etc. Not just sexual activity.

Either way, once these basest of sexual activities is accepted, political control moves in. Hate crimes, special protections, and acceptence of the behavior create legitimate markets and simultaneously lead to the promotion of vices. Freedom in this ever increasing warped world comes to mean masturbating to dirty pictures on the internet. It certainly no longer means free speech of ideology by free men. That would be actually hard to combat by our financial and political elite. The Sexual Revolution was a Revolution. It was simply the means to eventual bondage. Think Brave New World. Even though Huxley was one of "THEY" or "THEM", he told us what they were up to.  

But this unnatrual attraction to created things (concupiscense) is the tool for "spirtitual", financial, and political control. And it is easy to see that it is nothing "THEY" created. It is something "THEY" exploited. It's parasitical like usury and derivatives.

Hope I did not ramble too much or confuse. If I had more time, I most certainly would have written a shorter post.

scorpio

They Live is a great movie and a thinly veiled reference to our ziomasters.
My favorite part is when he has the glasses on and looks at some money.
It says "THIS IS YOUR GOD"
that says it all.

P.S. Of course the ending is classic as well. When the mind control signal (aka television) is turned off,
several of the newscasters are exposed as aliens.

[youtube:3es2nw5f]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Lwlx3GnLGs[/youtube]3es2nw5f]

Ognir

Most zionists don't believe that God exists, but they do believe he promised them Palestine

- Ilan Pappe

thirdeyewise

The movie: Dark City...........who do these guys remind you of?

One need not be a prophet to be aware of impending dangers. An accidental combination of experience and interest will often reveal events to one man under aspects which few see.

-F.A. Hayek

§N9sh2bj

http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:8Qt ... =firefox-a

The underground machine is the contract.
The ring signifies the contract (LOTR).

Destroy the contract or annul it.
moved on.
the author does not adopt jewish \'race theory\' or \'darwinism\'.
and believes \'jewish culture\' is mostly one of supporting their organized crime syndicates, with a enough veneer and an organized system of destroying and reshaping other cultures, to obfuscate the truth to most people.

MikeWB

"They Live" was John Carpenter's favorite movie. He said in an interview once that the budget for the movie was too small to implement his vision for it so he took few shortcuts. He always wanted to remake it but we all know that it will never happen. How this got past the censors is quite amazing! I guess all the "robot" imagery threw them off. Imagine if "they" were more human ;)

PS: Don't want to start a new thread on this but does anyone remember a press release for a self-published book of some screenwriter or producer in Hollywood who claims that for some movies a guy from Israeli consulate is present in the meetings and he voices his support or disproval of some scripts. I remember the article but don't remember the guy's name or more details. I'd like to re-read it.
1) No link? Select some text from the story, right click and search for it.
2) Link to TiU threads. Bring traffic here.