“JEW” defined…

[Anonymous]

"JEW" defined...

Let us further define this anomaly called, a; "Jew".
Could it be rightfully claimed that a "Jew" is a mere legal fiction, a "status" afforded to rank, in a certain race, to the detriment of all other races?
Does an Ashkenazi Communist Zionist Jew, residing in Israel, receive the same issued license plate on his auto as say, a Sephardic Jew, an American Sephardic Jew or Arab Jew?
And could it be further said, that a "Jew" is a devoted follower of a Pharisee's and believes in the oral validity of the law?
In other words, "the law is what I say it is today....tomorrow it may be something else?"
Is this what the "Jew" has been hiding behind for nigh 6000 years?
When a "Jew" spends more time and takes greater care in washing his hands then any other personal venture then, does that mean he is reciting a prayer over his next victim, that he should escape Scott free with the money along with no chance of getting caught?
The "law" requires one to come to the table with clean hands.
The clean hands doctrine is to accept the offer and return the honor or go into default.
To tell the truth...
because to lie...is to go against the mind.
I found Saddam Hussien to be in a firm grasp of the clean hands doctrine.
He simply had a servant hold the bowl for his guest, a former British M.P. in order that he may consider the offer to wash his hands before engaging Saddam.
I'll go along with that.

UNCLEAN HANDS

Unclean hands, sometimes clean hands doctrine or dirty hands doctrine[1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy on account of the fact that the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint—that is, with "unclean hands".[2] The defendant has the burden of proof to show the plaintiff is not acting in good faith. The doctrine is often stated as "those seeking equity must do equity" or "equity must come with clean hands".
A defendant's unclean hands can also be claimed and proven by the plaintiff to claim other equitable remedies and to prevent that defendant from asserting equitable affirmative defenses. In other words, 'unclean hands' can be used offensively by the plaintiff as well as defensively by the defendant. Historically, the doctrine of unclean hands can be traced as far back as the Fourth Lateran Council.

[Anonymous]

The plaintiff or the defendant as the case may be, is entitled to ban the presence of his adversary from any legal arena, should he show with unclean hands.
No Ifs, No ands, No buts

[Anonymous]

Jesus did the exact same thing in throwing the Jews out of the Temple who were caught conducting business for a profit.
He caught them selling knowledge of law in exchange for silver and gold.

[Anonymous]

phar·i·see  (fr-s)
n.
1. Pharisee A member of an ancient Jewish sect that emphasized strict interpretation and observance of the Mosaic law in both its oral and written form.
2. A hypocritically self-righteous person.

Absolutely NOTHING!!
Has changed.

[Anonymous]

I dislike the Democrats
I dislike the Jews.
Both are statements of dislike for a political party....a tribe as it were.
Who can claim I harmed them?
Who can stand up and claim hatred?
How does a legal fiction existing only on paper or in some persons feeble mind claim to be harmed?
An individual Jew does not have a covenant with his God.
His party (tribe) does.
My previous statement should hit home as to why the Jew cannot come to the table with clean hands.
The Pharisees has yet again, raised its ugly head.
It is a Christians claim of right to duty, to spoon fed the Serpents own vomit back to him until he chokes to death on its own puke.

[Anonymous]

The Jew never presents himself.
The Jew, without failure always re-presents himself as the PARTY (corporate tribe).
The Jew reasons, that if, his actions are done in the name of the party, under state policy then, who can hold him accountable? :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

[Anonymous]

ISRAELI state policy is the TALMUD
And I can if need be: PROVE IT!

[Anonymous]

Zionism is nothing more than a splinter group of the Jew, to deflect attention away from them, who of course, is a member of the Pharisee.

[Anonymous]

I have found that I can not insult a Jew.
It is 100% impossible...
What I did find, is that I can only insult the tribe (party).
But, the wily shape shifting Jew suddenly changes position and takes the insult personally.
Therefore,
Does the individual Jew re-present the tribe (party)?
If this is so then, where is the Jews license or permit to re-present a legal entity?

[Anonymous]

If you want to get a Jew Jumpin just bring up some of these legal facts to him.
With a little practice you can have the wily Jew doing the Tasmanian Devil thing right before your very eyes.
If you show up the Jew in law, you had better well expect him to blow his cork and start climbing the walls like a turpentined cat. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

[Anonymous]

No doubt exists in my mind that I could not write a book of 600+ pages and never leave the subject: "The Elusive Jew".
No one...least of all a Jew, can define a Jew, as to what he is or where he is coming from.
One thing is clear...
There are no innocent persons.
Just the honorable and the dishonorable people.
And that my dear friends....
Is the bottom line.