ObamaCare + Cap & Trade - Obama's Jobs for Jews Programs ?

[abduLMaria]

Cui Bono ?

Always a good question to ask.

I have been looking at the beneficiaries of ObamaCare, partially because I am mystified by his determination to pass a turd of a bill that are turning many lifelong Democrats into people that are planning on voting Republican in 2010.

Why would Obama pass a bill that he know sucks  ?

Obama knows that Obama-care will enrage a good portion of the 30 million that it forces to buy products from the Health Insurance companies.

So it makes me wonder - why is he doing it ?

2 reasons, I propose -

1.  It creates jobs among a particular demographic.

No matter HOW BAD the economy gets, Obama-care protects jobs at 3 places -
*  health insurance companies
*  pharmaceutical companies
*  health care organizations (doctors, nurses, administrators)

2.  Obama-care forces Americans into a situation where they are monitored and watched.

Just like that guy in Massachusetts whose psychiatrist wife turned him because he was an active gun enthusiast.

Now, these are 2 definite results of Obama-care, but I see a few others.  Specifically, 2 legal showdowns.

A.  A legal showdown relating to States Rights and the 10th Amendment.

30 states have resolutions in their legislatures to over-rule the Individual Mandate.

Obama-care will create lots of jobs for lawyers.  I don't know if that if the purpose, but it certainly will be one of the results.

B.  A legal showdown relating to Religious Rights vs. Obama-care.

Many Americans will discover the benefits of Amish and Christian Science lifestyles, for those are 2 religions that have an inherent object to American medical care that I believe has been allowed - in the past.


Anyway, Obama is picking a BIG FIGHT with his Obama-care, and I definitely have to wonder why.

Given who Obama-care will create jobs for, it looks like a job protection program for the following demographics -
*  HMO companies
*  pharmaceutical companies
*  doctors
*  lawyers
*  and their hangers-on (investors, etc.)

As far as Cap & Trade - it benefits carbon traders (carbon traitors ?)  2 of the most prominent being Goldman Sachs & Al Gore.

Like I said, ObamaCare + Cap&Trade = Jobs for Jews.


Certainly it has been my own tendency, as the economy deteriorates, to concentrate on cutting costs, making sure I have money for when certain investments become available at a low price, and so.

Paying $400 a month to an HMO for sh*t medical care is not high up on my list of priorities.

Now multiply me, with that attitude, times a few hundred million.  Doctors would make half as much money - probably less.

So, in the guise of caring about families bankrupted by health care costs - and I'm sure not saying America has a good health care system for middle class & poor people - Obama is passing a bunch of laws that serve to maintain employment for a certain demographic.

Unfortunately for America's Goyim, that comes at a very high cost, for Obama-care is enforced by the IRS.  i.e., Obama-care will be enforced at gun-point - they will take the money out of your bank.  if you take it out of your bank and put it in a safe at home, they will come and retrieve it.  if you stand in their way, they will use force.

That is the way the IRS works.  If Obama-care passes, the IRS will be tasked with collecting the fines for not signing up with an HMO ($750 and up).  Most of that money will be taken from middle class and poor people - not wealthy people.

like Robin Hood - but in reverse.  Rob from the poor & middle class, give to the wealthy.

The only IRS employee I've known personally was a manager named Ken Hempel who managed the IRS office in Oakland, CA.  He rented 3 rooms; I rented a room for a few months.

I can't conclude that all or most IRS employees are Jewish.  But he was, or is.

Is it my imagination, or do the laws that Obama is trying to pass favor Jewish people economically - and significantly ?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Is it my imagination, or do the laws that Obama is trying to pass favor Jewish people economically - and significantly ?

Not your imagination at all in my opinion AbdulMaria... I think you nail it pretty good:

viewtopic.php?f=7&p=37233#p35634