Varmint Watch -- Rick Adams, Another Bogus Truth-Teller Exposed at RBN

[RoaminLam]

Spotlight on Rick "The Weasel" Adams:
Another Bogus Truth-Teller Exposed at RBN

Rick Adams, "The Radio Avenger"
RBN "Uncensored": May 5, 2010
http://republicbroadcasting.org/

It was not my idea of fun to call in to a political talk show that I'd been following closely for the past two or three years. But the host had won my trust and respect, so I needed to probe his integrity when it came under doubt in my mind. For a year I'd been sending him sometimes very long and always thoughtful emails without ever receiving an acknowledgment. Thus, when he gave his whole 2-hour program over to discussing Polish issues a few days after the aviation disaster in Smolensk, I knew the time had come.

I was nervous about stepping up to a forum where I'd heard others call in from as far away as Europe and Australia. I knew I'd be vulnerable confronting a professional analyst about matters I was deeply sensitive to. Yet I was certain I stood on firm ground with regard to the biased and false statements I'd been hearing, and the bond of solidarity I felt with his audience compelled me to bring it to their attention when I smelled something fishy that no one else seemed to be picking up on.

What follows is conceived with people like myself in mind – either listeners to Rick Adams' "Uncensored" at Republic Broadcasting Network or anyone who's been waking up to the notion that all ain't as it should be in what Baby Boomers like myself used to hear referred to as "the Good Old US of A."  Most of us have long since migrated from the so-called "mainstream" in our search for clues about what's going on in the bigger world. But, as more and more of us have been disillusioned to find out, the 'alternative" sources aren't really offering us more than a choice between two poisons. This, perhaps sophomoric insight underpins everything that I'm about to say.

I'm not under any illusion that my observations, and the warning that naturally follows from them, will reach their intended audience – or that they're even that earth shattering or unique. But we all have our own little piece of the puzzle, and I haven't seen this one out on the table yet, at least in the US patriot forums. Moreover, as with my two, very public phone calls, analyzed in detail below, I'm doing this in the first instance only to please myself. My little David-and-Goliath drama with the radio host has taken a toll on my resources for a number of weeks now. By writing and posting this, I intend to get it off my chest. Others may pass it over or mine something useful from what I'm about to say, as the case may be.

So here it is, just for the record.

My April 13 call, beginning somewhere past 40 minutes into the first hour, ran through some polite preliminaries. Rick Adams, in fact, said he thought I might call in, and I was surprised to discover that he'd actually read my communications. But I hadn't called his show so we could stroke each other's egos – I hear too much of that as it is on RBN – so after a while our exchange got rather heated and testy.

Rick's sidekick, Dr. K, addressed our impasse first by siding strongly with his mentor, then by remarking that no one had "ever been given an hour before," and that other callers were queued up, waiting their turn. Rick offered to have me on later for a fuller airing of our differences, and, again, I was a bit surprised when he did get in touch a few weeks later to offer me a whole evening as his special guest.

As he announced upcoming shows on the evening before our scheduled encounter, Rick billed his debate with "Bob from New Jersey" as a "Ten-Star" event. I'd never seen more than Five Stars given out for anything else before. Why was he putting so much stress on this? In retrospect, I'm sure he just assumed that he'd be regaling his listeners with a festive barbecue. Professional radio jockeys are adept at toying with their occasional critics, getting them flustered, chewing them up, spitting them out, and dismissing them as idiots. Fortunately – if somewhat fortuitously – for me and the cause I'd exposed myself to defend, that's not quite what happened.

Any alert listener would have discerned, especially during the second hour, when the encounter got hot, that the host was – and had been, on previous occasions – lying about a major crime of the 20th century, one that was closely tied in with other events and circumstances that he discussed habitually. Moreover, his explicit advocacy for "the lesser of two evils," in the context of the Second World War, simply does not square with the "libertarian with a small 'l'" philosophy that he endorses.

Interested observers of today's political scene in America are not required to understand Polish history or to know the story of Poland in the Second World War. But – whatever topic at hand – when an influential conservative US opinion-shaper is revealed to be highly disingenuous, it means something. When a pundit who constantly spouts Holy Scripture is observed in a clearly hypocritical pose, it ought to diminish his credibility. And when this same, self-proclaimed Accountant for Truth is caught cooking the books of argument with the charlatan's calculus of classic logical trickery, it's time for his loyal audience to reevaluate the moral solvency of his entire enterprise.

But – it must be asked – how many of Rick Adams' listeners caught on to his duplicity?  He mockingly questioned my assertions, he was swift about sweeping embarrassing revelations under the rug, and he preserved an unruffled composure throughout our exchange.

Despite all the fanfare about "critical thinking" in American schools (I happen to be a teacher) – or perhaps, in some way, because of it – today's public is remarkably maladroit in the arts of intellectual self-defense. How many listeners actually registered the fact that Rick plainly lost his argument with me, or digested the implications of this fact?

This is also why I've been at pains to transcribe long passages from several shows, and to produce this account ... just so there will be a document, and just to extend a formal invitation to other long-time listeners at RBN, if they judge it worth the effort, to verify for themselves that the "Paul Revere of Talk Radio" is an imposter.

To be sure, Rick Adams has provided his audience with a lot of valuable facts and analysis. That's why he's been on the scene for as long as he has, and why he commands an audience that's as intelligently outside-the-box as many of his guests and callers have revealed themselves to be. But if Rick is misrepresenting one major complex of events, whatever it is, we have to ask ourselves – What else is he lying about? What's his real agenda, anyway? How else is he messing with the minds of his listeners?

When I entered the lists for open combat on May 5, I introduced my beef as something relating to all the "Nazi nonsense" and "Hitler hype" I'd been hearing in the US patriot forums, and more specifically to false and biased treatment of the Polish-German conflict within the larger context of the post-Versailles and World War II era, especially as these topics have been presented on "Uncensored" by Rick Adams and some of his featured guests.

The first half of our debate came off without major disagreement, but at around 13 ½ minutes into the second hour, I put on my mantle as the Jersey Jouster, threw down the gauntlet, and Rick Adams picked it up, as recorded in the following exchange:

BOB:   The two totalitarian Powers took Poland apart and subjected it to really awful genocide, and both of these countries did the same thing to Poland. I mean, pointing the finger at the Soviets for Katyn is really very hypocritical. The Germans were up to their eyeballs in Polish blood as well, and it does not resonate well with me to hear you, and others, making a big issue out of Katyn and then very carefully dancing and edging around ...
RICK: [interrupting]   Well, give us some examples.
BOB:   OK. Let me move into this. When the Germans invaded ...
RICK: [interrupting again] Well, wait a minute, wait a minute, hold on. Now you opened up a Pandora. It's like a hit-and-run type of thing. I want you to give our listeners an example of all of the German massacres, or alleged Nazi massacres, that you know ....  [long digression about what "the problem is"] .... So tell us, now tell us about all the German massacres in Poland because I want to know about it, I do.

Again, at 17 ½ minutes into the second hour ...

RICK:   You're still not answering the question.

At 18 minutes and 35 seconds ...

RICK:   Well, what I'm saying is, I'm asking you, Bob, and I'm trying to do this as, as, as nicely and politely as I can. I'm asking you to back up your statement that you said that there were as many German massacres and bloodlettings in Polish territory that we don't know about, and I want to know about them ....
BOB:    I've told you about one of them.
RICK:   I want to hear about all of them because, the way you describe it, there were many, I think you said.
BOB:   I can't believe that you don't know about this, Rick. I mean ....
RICK:   Well, that's why I'm asking you ...
BOB:   You're a smart guy ...
RICK:   For the sake of all of us ....

Thus the issue was clearly set forth. Here is an outline of what happened over the 40 minutes this argument occupied ... and how it ended.

I launched into a discussion of the "Bromberg Massacre," a term denoting the alleged Polish mass execution of innocent German civilians in Bydgoszcz  (Bromberg) on the third day of the German invasion of Poland.

On April 13, when I'd first called to challenge him, Rick alluded to "the slaughter of ethnic Germans," citing this incident as proof that "there's blame to go around on all sides." I pointed out that those "innocent Germans" in "Bromberg" were actually a fifth column, openly engaged in the attack on Poland. Rick answered slyly, "Well, that's what some people are saying, but that's not what's accepted universally."

Returning to May 5, I insisted that the real massacre, on a scale of thousands, occurred when the Germans entered the town and took retribution for the several hundred German fifth-columnists who had opened fire a bit too soon and paid for this mistake with their lives. My claim about the wanton slaughter of a much larger, and truly innocent, Polish population was received with taunting skepticism.

At this point, Rick had me in the hot seat and was steadily turning up the flame. I kept my cool pretty well. Still, things might have gone badly for me after this.

But ... it sometimes happens in the fortunes of war, and in the tumult of talk radio, that Serendipity strikes with such stunning significance you almost have to believe some Higher Power is watching over us and does intervene, from time to time, on the side of His little folk, when they stand up in a righteous way against long odds.

In this case, a White Knight rode in ... and pulled my [chest]nuts out of the fire. It was one of the most dramatic rescues I've ever experienced. Rick opened up the phone lines ....

.... And the first caller turned out to be a man from Bydgoszcz. He declared that he was "well familiar ... from first-hand reports" with precisely the topic in dispute. He spoke, in a dignified Polish accent, of 143,000 inhabitants in Bydgoszcz at the time, 9200 of them German ... described how the very first Sunday of the war, when the Germans took the city, some 5000 Polish doctors, teachers, professors, lawyers, and priests were lined up in the city square and shot ...  and how the German fifth column had prepared lists of them in advance. He then remarked somewhat acidly,

I'm really surprised that Rick Adams does not know that. These are well-known facts.

The caller then began to talk about the mass graves of 20,000 Poles, shot on the outskirts of town in a place called The Valley of the Dead, "within roughly the same time period..."

At this point, the Radio Pretender interrupted, "All right. So we know it now. Thank you very much for the call. We don't have time [...talking over the caller...] to start the next call," and so forth. Blah, blah blah.

Rick Adams filled up with sheer blather what time remained until the commercial break kicked in, obviously drowning out a voice that was speaking authoritatively to the very issue in dispute, but whose message was not going to be elaborated any further on the program "Uncensored" ... clearly ... because it so powerfully demolished the false contentions of the man who was running the show.

"Darius from Phoenix" had spoken for less than two minutes. In contrast, the two callers at the end of the program, who had absolutely nothing to contribute, got much more time.

On the following day, Darius sent a long personal email to Rick Adams. It was filled with information – both public and personal – regarding the awful fate which befell the large-majority, Polish population of Bydgoszcz (27% murdered by the Germans) and the heart-rending ordeals of his own family under the German Occupation. It was written in a generous and conciliatory spirit.

The letter by Darius of Phoenix to Rick Adams appears at the end of this report. Let fair-minded readers make up their own minds about who is telling the truth.

I also emailed the talk show host on the following day – in a high-minded spirit – offering to continue our discussion of Nazi apologetics on his program, "Uncensored," at some future time. This letter is also made public at the end of my report. But don't hold your breath. Neither of these remarkable gestures has been acknowledged.

An American woman from Utah called next. She was highly skeptical of my credentials and questioned me at length. I responded (I believe) with polite self-assurance and an evident command of the material I'd presented myself to argue about.

Then a call was taken from veteran Polish anti-defamation activist Dana Alvi of California,
http://www.papurec.org/
whom Rick had long been after to appear on his show but who had proved  curiously unavailable. I knew Dana from my California days. We first came in contact more than ten years ago, around the time I challenged my department chair – and subsequently lost my full-time college position of many years – over her use of instructional materials that depicted Polish people graphically as swine. Rick had mentioned Dana last September, so I put her on alert about my upcoming debate with him.

As a child, Dana had experienced the German Occupation in Warsaw. Like the earlier caller from Bydgoszcz, Dana supported my claims about German savagery, vividly describing the almost daily, random street executions in Warsaw and elsewhere, which, she testified, especially targeted Polish males. Dana summed her statement up with these words,

I don't think anyone can doubt, any soldier, any German soldier, or anyone who knows the history, that Poles were killed, were murdered, in great masses.

Rick Adams' response to this is worth pondering:

I think that's definitely backed up by documentation. [He said this at 48 minutes into the second hour.]

Indeed. After what had been so forcefully and authoritatively presented, he could scarcely disagree. He thus conceded the very point he'd firmly – and sarcastically – contested, about 40 minutes earlier.

Next, please note how quick Slick Rick slunk off into the Swamp of Sophistry, executing a deft, question-begging maneuver, abandoning the issue at hand, and commencing once more to bemoan "decades of Soviet enslavement" after the war,

... the part that everybody seems to have forgotten, you know .... and the tragedies that would have been completely unnecessary but for the treason within our own [American] government.

Recall that this was the very hypocrisy I had put on trial when we began sparring seriously.

Rick Adams, therefore, clearly lost the argument. But he made no concession. That, in itself, was dishonest and ungentlemanly.

There's a well-known bit of American folk wisdom that runs like this: If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's probably a duck.

Now, our metaphorical menagerie of human fauna is also inhabited by a certain furtive, low-slung, beady-eyed varmint known as the WEASEL. Its distinguishing characteristics include the propensity to slink from one position to another without arousing notice of any contradictory offense. Alert observation pays off. With a little practice, this pernicious pest can be identified, trapped, and properly disposed of.

Based on the performance we've just revisited, how soon do you think you'll hear Nazi apologetics, German atrocities in Poland, or Bob from New Jersey ever mentioned again on RBN's popular show "Uncensored"?

Let's enlarge the focus a bit now and look at a few more instances of bias, inaccuracy and specious reasoning that have come into play on Rick Adams' show around the same complex of issues we've just seen under dispute.

This was just a small flourish on Rick's part, but it's another example of his argumentative underhandedness: putting words into his opponent's mouth. At one point in his long exchange with Dana Alvi on May 5, he interjected, "I'm sure Bob would disagree."

Sad to say, it appears that the listeners were denied "Bob's" swift objection, due to one of the neat little tricks employed on radio talk shows like "Uncensored." My experience as a caller revealed to me that someone's got a finger on the squelch button there in the studio, for my understandable protest at being represented by my adversary is nowhere to be heard – at least not on the audio file that's still, as of the present writing, available for download at RBN's website.

Here's another small touch, but it's consistent with the thesis that Rick Adams is anything but eager to facilitate the free flow of ideas when they run contrary to his own mendacious propaganda. One of the callers asked if I had a website. I don't. It was agreed that Rick would provide this man with my email address so he could further explore whatever was on his mind. I'm still waiting to hear from him and be apprised of what he wanted to ask me about.

In our dispute on April 13, I challenged Rick's denunciation (a few minutes earlier) of Soviet, British and American mass murder during the Second World War. This was an obvious whitewash, I said.

At 18 minutes and 18 seconds into the second hour, I asked, in response to Rick's accusation that I was implying he had "an axe to grind" and that he was "being disingenuous,"

BOB:   Why would you not mention the Germans as mass killers in World War II when you mention the Russians, the Americans, the Brit...
RICK:   [interrupting] Because it is an established fact that the Soviet Empire was in fact guilty of the greatest genocide.
BOB:   I wouldn't argue with that. I think they killed more people.
RICK:   Well, that's the reason...
Dr. K:   Let me just say that, in fairness to the other callers, we really do have to go on ....

Think about this now. In light of the Soviets' unparalleled accomplishments in the field of mass killing, Rick could not possibly have given a weaker justification. His inflated verbiage – "documented fact ... in fact" – illustrates an age-old technique of logical legerdemain: using hot air to produce the illusion of substance where none really exists.

Also omitted here is the fact that the Soviets were in the business much longer, from about 1917 to 1991, with the hemorrhage easing off in the second half of their bloody reign, whereas Hitler's Thousand Year Reich enjoyed little more than a decade in which to rack up its world-class body count.

During the same, April 13 encounter, I spoke cogently (I believe) for two minutes about the period following the Partitions of Poland, attempting to make the Polish case, which had been ignored by Rick and his guests in presenting the "injustices" done to Germany by the Versailles Treaty, notably concerning German territorial losses in the East, due to the resurrection of Poland.

Rick interrupted, "You know, you're all over the map, and I understand, for time's sake, that we're not going to be able to sort through the pages of history here." He then referred to "biases," and found time to go off on a two-minute monologue of his own.

The 377-word transcript of his rebuttal shows that it was Rick, not Bob, who was "all over the map," moving, as he did, from the Roman Empire to the Indians in America to the Tatars to the Rothschilds, and finally arriving at the "Bromberg Massacre" of 1939, as if this constituted anything resembling an intelligent response to what I'd said, or as if he'd somehow demonstrated that, "you have to have some sort of context when you speak, Bob, and, and, the problem is," etc, etc.

Rick's statement here is a study in balderdash. It's completely without substance, coherence or structure – in sharp contrast to what I had been saying (in my opinion). Yet Rick sustained a tone of unruffled authority, ending with the words, "and that's my point, Bob," whereon, after a moment of quiet, "Bob's" voice, which had been silenced by the now-familiar mute button, began to fade back in at mid-sentence.

How many listeners to talk radio are taken in by this kind of twaddle? More than a few, I suspect. At least there is now a record of this particular case ... should anyone be interested, or care.

During the first half of our May 5 interview, when questioned about his oft-indulged Nazi nostalgia, Rick claimed he was merely choosing "the lesser of two evils." Note again the singular weakness of this reasoning. It strains credulity that a man as astute as Rick Adams lacks the imagination to come up with any alternative to the choice between German National Socialism and Bolshevik International Socialism. Furthermore, this comes from a commentator who loudly decries the contemporary socialization of America. Who is he fooling, anyway?

You can hear Rick discoursing further – out of the other side of his mouth – in the first hour of the program on May 5, when, under pressure, he denies an affinity for Hitler

This (now fairly common) framing of the Second World War as a contest between the Nazis and the Soviets – wherein we're invited to take sides with the former party – is, as I pointed out, little more than another permutation of the old Hegelian dialectical trap.

The implied logic behind this preference is that the Bolsheviks were fundamentally Jewish, while the Nazis were famously – beginning with Samuel Untermeyer's declaration of war against Germany on behalf of World Jewry in 1933 – in mortal combat with the same International Jewish Establishment that's subverted America and is consolidating world domination today.

In fact, there are uncanny points of harmony between the Nazis and the Zionists. This was one of the seven points I outlined at the beginning of my May 5 presentation but did not have time to develop. For example, it's fairly well known that Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote in his Diaries that, "The anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies." This theme could be elaborated on at some length – e.g., it reverberates, tellingly perhaps, in the context of the Rick Adams Show. But suffice it to say that the conventional paradigms for explaining World War II – including the one that Rick has been promoting – are open to serious criticism. I mentioned Jim Condit's Internet documentary, "The Final Solution to Adolph Hitler," as a good place to begin this critique.

On April 14, Rick brought up a returning guest: "researcher, historian, and a brilliant columnist," Deanna Spingola. Before long, they got into the same topics I had challenged Rick over in my call on the previous night.

Spingola displayed a shockingly weak grasp of this material when she brought up American "Lend Lease [to Russia] at the beginning of probably 1941." Anyone with the most passing knowledge of the war in Europe recalls that Germany and the USSR were allies – mostly at Poland's expense – right up to the German assault against Russia on June 22, 1941. This is a date that's etched about as deeply in historic memory as, say, July 4, 1776, or December 7, 1941, or November 11, 1918. Why doesn't this "brilliant ... researcher" know it?

In fact, American Lend Lease began during the fall of 1941, as the Soviets reeled under the German onslaught. Spingola had the audacity to remark, "We supplied all [sic] of the military vehicles, airplanes, bombs and whatnot to Stalin so that he could wage war against Germany, and Germany was the one country that the Bolsheviks wanted to take out."

Spingola went on to say, "It was actually Russia that started the Second World War [since] they were going to go into Germany .... [and] Hitler understood what was going on ... [and] attacked first." This is on a par with Mike Piper's contention (also on RBN) last fall that, "Germany wasn't necessarily the aggressor" when it invaded Poland in 1939.

Distortions of this magnitude cannot be excused as pertaining to some understandably confusing clash of perspectives, or an overzealous shading of the truth. They qualify as paranoid psychosis. Yet "Radio Avenger" Rick Adams expresses agreement throughout Spingola's presentation of this drivel, passing her off as a "brilliant ... researcher" no less.

Earlier in the same conversation, Spingola had lamented the plight of ,,all the Germans who lived in the area that was just basically handed over to Poland with the signing of the Versailles Treaty." She did not acknowledge the 18th century Partitions of Poland, in which a major European nation lost its sovereign statehood, the generations of foreign bondage suffered by the Polish people, or the fact that in 1918 this ,,area" was still populated by a clear Polish majority. She complained that ,,it created a minority population in what then became Poland," without conceding that an equal or even larger number of Polish-speaking folk remained, as German citizens, on the other side of the deeply resented ,,Polish border." Spingola charged that this newly resurrected Poland ,,was belligerent to the Germans." She did not say, even-handedly, that the two nations were in conflict, much less that Germany was ,,belligerent" to the newly-created Polish state, which would have been a far more apt observation, given the much greater size and strength of Germany, and given the long and recent history of state-sponsored German oppression against the Poles – not the other way around.

What are we to make of such blatant bias in an "alternative" forum that trades on its moral probity? What are we to make of a veteran talk show host who rails unceasingly against the lying, thieving, murderous, Kenite, Bolshevik, Talmudic Jews ... yet who propagates impudent slander about alleged Polish atrocities against Germans, air brushes out of history the great Nazi-German land-grab in the East – the cornerstone Hitler's projected, glorious future for the Master Race – and either feigns ignorance of Germany's genocide against the Poles, or is such a master of doublethink that he truly believes it never happened?

Rick Adams has brought useful knowledge to his audience – which is how he's attracted their attention and captured their allegiance to begin with. The man who was Rick's guest two days after me had credentials I couldn't dream of. Robert Wilcox, the author of nine books, came on to speak about one of them, Target Patton, which examines the probable assassination of a major American figure of the 20th century. Jeff Gates – though clearly not on the level, for whatever reason, when it comes to his presentation of Al Qaeda and the Taliban – is a first-rate intellect who furthers our understanding of how the US political system has become as corrupt as it is. The well-informed listener from Texas, who spoke on Constitutional issues the Tuesday after my appearance, was well worth listening to. We have to acknowledge that we are indebted for this kind of material.

Yet we know that disinfo is most effectively administered in potions of alluring truth, and when we catch brief glimpses, as we sometimes do, of the bushy lupine tail projected from the the disarming cloak of the lamb, however modest our station, we owe it to ourselves, and to our fellow patriots of every nation, to sound an alarm and to demand an explanation.

Let us extend our accounting a bit further still, before closing out the books, to register several other entries that don't quite add up.

Rick Adams, and others at RBN, promote the shill Ron Paul. If you still haven't caught on that this guy is another wolf in sheep's clothing ... well ... please keep trying. A couple months ago, perhaps under pressure from his listeners, Rick backed off a bit on Ron Paul, conceding that his public stance on 9-11 had been less than truthful.

But it's his criticism of the Federal Reserve and affiliation with the von Mises Institute of Austria that draw the most favorable attention. Perhaps the ultimate, credible authority for listeners to RBN regarding the economic formulas offered by Ron Paul would be Daryl Bradford Smith at <http://iamthewitness.com/>. In his audio files over many months, Smith has fiercely denounced Ron Paul as a Judas goat.

Stephen Zarlenga founded the American Monetary Institute and wrote The Lost Science of Money, an eye-opening book on the "dismal science," replete with insights you'll never learn in college economics courses: only the elites are handed such Keys to the Kingdom. Zarlenga denounces Ron Paul just as firmly as does Daryl Smith, albeit in a more soft-spoken and genteel tone. The book is expensive – though worth every penny – but a set of recent, in-depth podcast interviews with Zarlenga is available, without charge and without obnoxious commercial interruption, at <http://gnosticmedia.com/>.

Daryl Smith is the best single instructor I've had in my Conspiracy Studies curriculum over the past several years, but just as a matter of principle, I don't trust any of the players in this game blindly or endorse any of the websites without hesitation. Scott Smith, Daryl's brother and the partner of Rick Adams, is the best reason I can think of to wonder if Daryl is on the level, and to question his intentions at the French Connection website.

Scott was a guest on "Uncensored" last week, two days after I appeared. He spoke at length, and with obvious relish, about high-powered rifles and other firearms, advocating that the listeners arm themselves as well and as quickly as they can. On previous appearances, Scott has put out this same, tough-talking yahoo line: "They want my bullets? They can have my bullets. Come and get them!"

Now, I happen to think that the Second Amendment was a great idea, and I take deep comfort in knowing that so many of my like-minded countrymen are well provided for in this regard. Though a last-ditch defense, our armed and patriotic citizens remain a potent barrier to Tyranny. There's nowhere else on earth that the encroaching New World Order faces such a formidable opposition of last resort.

More than 40 years ago, much against my wishes, I went to Vietnam as a combat rifleman. The last thing I'd want to do today – from the very bottom of my heart – is to direct lethal force against another person. But let's not be naïve: We owe it to ourselves, and to the Liberty we cherish, to be as well prepared as possible for anything that's in the cards.

Make no mistake, however. This calls for nerves of steel, and profound restraint. There will be incidents; people like us will be blamed. Under these circumstances, anything that carries even the faintest odor of provocation, or incitement to violence, ought to arouse the gravest suspicion. Rick Adams' partner Scott Smith, and others who talk the same line – e.g., John Stadtmiller, the Director at RBN – make me very uneasy.

Finally, Rick Adams makes frequent Biblical allusions. Many of his guests and callers parse and dispute the meaning of Scripture with impressive expertise. We are warned about the seed of Cain and the Synagogue of Satan. We are instructed in the lore of the true Israelites and the Adamic race. Amidst all the fearsome turmoil and malevolence of our world – about which Rick Adams, RBN, and others like them do such a good job of informing us – the heart of Rick Adams, if we can believe what he says, is at peace, for he knows God's plan, he knows exactly how all of this is going to be playing out. The Lord is going to return, and when He does ... oh my ... how the iniquitous will be made to pay!

Personally, I tend to be skeptical of pundits who claim direct knowledge of the future, whether the crystal balls they read from are Biblical or otherwise.

Michael Hoffman has written a superb book entitled Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit. It's impressively documented and runs to about 1200 pages, but it's also absolutely readable and engaging. In fact, it goes down about as smooth and biting as good scotch whiskey. Most of the way through the volume – following a gut-churning catalog of treachery, perversion and abuse – Hoffman asks the rather obvious question: What are we to do? How are we to respond to all of this? He answers as a Christian ... if you can believe him ... pointing to the clear and unambiguous instructions of Christ: we are told to forgive, to love our enemies, and to do good unto those who have injured us.

Nobody ever said this would be easy. But what's so covert or complicated about Christ's core teachings that someone as smart as Rick Adams just can't seem to get hold of? How can a Bible-thumper like Rick fail to pick up and pass on a Gospel message that's so plain and so prominent? Why is it that in all of the extensive references and discussions pertaining to God's Word, we never, ever, get a single citation of the injunctions to be meek and merciful, to practice humility, or to be as simple and innocent as little children? Where are the many warnings are we given to reign in our proud and haughty spirits?

The Christian Bible's a big and complicated book, but isn't what's been mentioned here an essential part of its content? How come this part of the message is so completely missing from the Biblical allusions of Rick Adams, and the many others like him?

Surely there is something to ponder in this as well.

I'd like to digress now, just a bit, to offer my own quirky view on the Jewish Question – a term from the past which has, oddly, gone out of vogue. Certainly the Jewish Question lies at the very core of what Rick Adams is all about.

One of the seven general subheadings that I outlined at the beginning of my presentation on May 5, which I had no opportunity to develop, was something I referred to as "Semantic Issues – The linguistic taproot of illusion, the great generator of avoidable conflict."

The average user of language has no awareness at all of the devilish nature of labels. This is one of the first traps that students of semantics are made aware of. George Orwell understood it, as witnessed in his exposition on the Principles of Newsspeak in 1984. The founder of General Semantics, Alfred Korzybski, understood it, as witnessed in his forgotten 1932 classic Science and Sanity, where he states that our civilization is insane, and, unless we address the problem effectively, we will surely destroy ourselves. The ancient Sanskrit grammarians understood this problem too. Unfortunately, we still don't.

Labels, on the one hand, are necessary and good. We have to call a spade a spade. Sometimes this is politically inexpedient, and it requires courage to do so. We need to develop, deploy – and defend at all costs – a rich and well-honed lexicon for this purpose.

On the other hand, labels muddy and obscure our meanings at least as much as they serve to focus and identify. There is sometimes so much that falls under the heading of a single label that it ceases to mean much of anything at all. Korzybski had a marvelous term for nominative place-holders of this type, which give an appearance of concrete referral but actually connect to nothing in Reality at all beyond the froth of our overactive mentation. He called this kind of vocabulary "verbal noise."

Of all the labels that are used to identify human groups, there may be no other that encompasses such a broad spectrum of types as the word "Jew." The people referred to here include Semitic and non-Semitic Jews – Sephardic, Ashkenazic and Khazarian – the religious and non-religious, cryptic and overt, Hebrew, Israelite, Israeli and Judean. There are Jews who preserve the strictest racial purity, intermarrying with their nieces and cousins to such a degree that their offspring inherit grave genetic consequences; and there are elite, monied Jews who, with great cunning, strategically marry their daughters into the aristocracies of the nations they aim to patiently infiltrate, subvert, and stealthily subject. These people come in every shape, size and color, and they speak almost every language known on earth. You can find them practically everywhere, but especially where there is wealth and power for the taking. Then we have the famous line from Revelation, "beware the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not." This adds yet another wrinkle of confusion to the mess, an element that might be described as "reverse crypsis."

I have wondered if the Jews are not really a race, an ethnicity or a religion at all, but rather something more on the order of a caste, like the Mandarins in China, or the Brahmins of India. But even that is not an absolute. In the years after my divorce, while living in a room in someone else's house, I had a Jewish neighbor who lived in the garage beneath my window and was persecuted (as I would be later) by our Jewish landlady because he was chronically insolvent and behind with his rent. Owen was a meek and gentle fellow who had a passion for gardening; he turned our shared backyard into a paradise.

So there seems to be a core of substance to the group we're talking about, but the meaning gets very fuzzy around the edges. That's about the best I've ever been able to do in identifying the subject at issue ... as we ponder and discuss the always topical, urgent and perplexing Jewish Question.

One of the guests Rick Adams had on in the past month or so was a Canadian writer named Greg Felton, author of The Host and the Parasite: How Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America. I read that book a couple years ago. I still have my copy.

But if you really seek to understand the parasitic nature of these so-called Jews, you have to be familiar with the extensive writings on this topic by the American sociologist, Dr. Kevin MacDonald. He describes this parasitic proclivity as a "group evolutionary strategy" – hence, more of a cultural than a political manifestation. The first of his works that I read, on the advice of an old friend about six years ago, was The Culture of Critique. I still think it was one of the most eye-opening books that's ever passed under my nose.

It's instructive to revisit the field of linguistics now, and to recall that the term "parasite" actually derives from the science of biology and denotes a biological adaptation, or an ecological niche, within the larger unity of creation. As such, the parasite plays a certain – arguably salutary and essential – role within nature's overarching scheme. There is no question of goodness or evil here; to a scientist, there's no such thing as a dirty substance. Things just are what they are; that's all.

In fact, the various domains of nature – biology and ecosystems, for example – abound with elements, balances, symbioses and relations that have their metaphoric parallels in the world of human social interaction. There is much wisdom to be derived from this observation. Money, for instance, has been compared to water – flowing, bringing nourishment, sustaining life wherever it passes. Metaphors like this are rich in corollary meanings; in fact, it's doubtful whether, without them, we'd have any handle on Reality at all.

One of the subtler understandings we come to as we study the relations between the predatory species and their prey – which no doubt applies to parasites and their hosts as well – is that the former actually cull, refine and strengthen the latter, improving their stock over time, which in turn requires the predatory species to sharpen its own adaptive advantages if it's going to continue in the dance of life. Thus, within a healthy ecological framework, these players, which superficially appear to be in conflict or at war, are in fact partners who not only need one another but bring out each other's best.

Returning now to the human and cultural domain, we may encounter circumstances in Germany, say, in the 1920s and 1930s, or the late 19th century, depending on what you read, wherein a tiny Jewish minority of half a percent or so achieved such preeminence as to constitute a cruel scourge and a mockery against, surely, one of the ablest peoples ever to walk the earth. There are various ways to look at this. The exploitation, the imbalance of power, might be regarded as a grave and intolerable wrong. But I take a rather contrarian view. When I hear this sad condition of the Germans spoken of with resentful aggrievement, I'm less inclined to feel pity than contempt.

Let's take another example. I really don't know much about Islamic civilization, but I understand that the Ottoman Empire was the longest-running empire in human history, that it lasted for more years than the Roman Empire did. It also contained a substantial Jewish element; however, according to the account I heard – and in which we are invited to attribute, in part at least, the Ottomans' success – the Jews were prohibited from being involved in education, finance or government. Now, I don't really know whether this is true or not, but it's a good story; it illustrates a point. It would seem that – Jews or no Jews – a disciplined vigilance regarding the moral and practical aspects of life is necessary to the maintenance of a strong and healthy social order. Could there be anything for us to learn from this in America today?

The Rick Adamses of the world can lead us in blaming and complaining about the Jews. But let's be fair. Surely we, too, deserve much of the credit for the terrible downfall that's overtaken us as a people. Had we not allowed ourselves to become so pathetically flaccid – mentally, physically, spiritually – this might never have happened to us. We have gone, in the span of a single lifetime, from being the world's most (though not universally) admired and preeminent power – whose "Yankee ingenuity" and "American knowhow" were the standard for everyone else when I was a kid in the fifties – to the laughing stock of the planet, despised and hated, a good candidate for the biggest basket case of all time, whose utter collapse is now threatening to bring down more innocents in its wake than any other national or imperial decline in history.

I don't exclude myself from this harsh judgment either. After all, look how long I was taken in by that huckster Rick Adams. How many other "listeners" out there have gotten a little dull on the thinking side, lost their edge of discernment? How many of you folks are still waiting for your own "Polish issue" to ignite, for something to come along that's offensive enough, and dear enough to your heart, that you too will screw up your courage, "call in," and cheerfully raise a little hell?

Perhaps we should be grateful to these consummate parasites, the Jews, for teaching us such an awful lesson about our wretchedness that we might, even in our dull torpor, perhaps begin to awaken and reclaim our birthright. For if, by some miracle, we ever managed to recover what's best in ourselves, and expunge all of the worst, if we could ever attain to our potential glory as a nation, or just as human beings, to our proper grace and dignity, wholeness and decency ... well, you know what? ... I think we ought to, out of the deepest appreciation, keep these nasty Jews around, as our worthy equals and our protectors, just to assure that we stay on our toes, just to bring out the best in us and prevent us from ever again sliding back into the abject disgrace that we may observe in ourselves today.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, based on experiences that none of us would envy, observed that "the line between good and evil runs through every human heart." No single group, no matter how sinister, has a corner on the commodity that's in Question as we focus (all of our righteous indignation) on the Jews. The Christian Messiah, great healer that He is, offered a well-known optical prescription of essentially the same intent (Mat. 7:5).

So there you have it, my own quirky take on the Jewish Question. It's not really an Answer, of course – the whole Question is much to deep and complicated for anything so neat and final as that. It's just something to think about, offered in a modest and helpful spirit.

Let us now return to the main thread of our discussion, so that we can wrap up (finally) after visiting about two more, major subtopics.

Readers who are uninitiated in Polish history may wonder how solidly the claims made in the heart of this essay can be backed up. The Poles may be as quarrelsome amongst themselves as were the ancient Greeks, so any watering hole Online, or any authority mentioned, is likely to draw howls of protest from some other quarter. The following, one-stop primer on Poland in the Second World War is offered with that reservation in mind. It's comprehensive yet can be read in less than an hour. The bibliography could be expanded on, certain omissions lamented, and some of the items included could be critically glossed. But let it stand as it is. It's a reasonable guess for orienting the uninformed to this tragic yet tellingly misrepresented – and paradoxically uplifting – chapter of modern history. After all, it's often through the deepest pits of trial and adversity that our human spirit finds the way to its noblest expression.

A 28-page pdf. file entitled "The Genocide of the Poles, 1939-1948"  may be accessed by visiting
http://www.piastinstitute.org/
clicking on Virtual Library and scrolling down to the heading, European History.

It may be worth mentioning that Polish-American activists had to fight tooth-and-nail against the organized Jewish lobby to have this document included as part of the state-mandated Holocaust curriculum in California. More recently, we have observed a similar phenomenon regarding acceptance of the Armenian genocide in American public discourse. This is likely to be more familiar than the Polish genocide to many readers who do not know much, in either case, about the Poles or the Armenians.

One final note is in order. I would stake my life on the claim that Poland's pre-war Jewish population of some 3 ½ million was about 90% ,,disappeared" in the Second World War. This was the ancient taproot of contemporary Ashkenazic Jewish civilization. Whatever your opinion about the influence of these people, overall, on the modern world, and whatever your beliefs about what happened to this population or where it ,,disapeared" to, you will find very few Polish sources supporting the denials, now much in vogue, that Jews were mass murdered in the Second World War. This is despite the bitterly conflicting memories and interpretations of Jews and Poles regarding their – largely overlapping – experiences in the World War II era.

Thus, the popular ,,holohoax" meme is a fraud, perhaps another permutation of the Big Lie, which has gained force through constant circulation. So many other world-class, fraudulent subversions ... of Jewish provenance ... have been alleged or proven – from the demeaning filth and pornography that spews out of Hollywood, to the lies in the Jewish-owned mass media, to the abject subservience of the US government (and others) to Jewish power, to the degradation of schooling, agriculture, medicine and the judiciary, to the unrestrained spying on American citizens by Jewish advocacy groups like the ADL, to the false-flag attack of 9-11 and the recent, ongoing, out-in-broad-daylight sacking of America's (and the world's) financial system – that it seems at first blush plausible the Jewish Holocaust, so constantly and hypocritically shoved down everyone else's throats – on everyone else's tab, of course– is but another cheeky Jewish con job, in spades.

Despite our understandable resentment, we need to exercise restraint, and make certain fine distinctions, i.e., in this instance, between a hoax and a racket. The utterly repugnant Holocaust Industry did not need to concoct this event, ex post facto, in order to exploit it cynically. To be sure, there is much that stinks to high heaven – all of the phony ,,survivors," the fantastically sleazy creatures like Elie Weisel, the now abandoned soap and lampshade stories, the greatly diminished death count at Auschwitz, and the unending, vile extortion for the benefit of ,,victims" who constitute the world's most affluent, privileged and influential ethnic group by far.  

But patience is in order here. We long for quick and simple answers, yet truth is still stranger than fiction. That whole, vast imbroglio of World War II history entails elements of nuance, ambiguity, deception and the hidden motives of still unidentified agencies, all of which require painstaking care to unravel properly. Quite likely the masses of Jews who were murdered – and went like lambs, almost without a whimper, to their fate – died, as did the victims of the much larger, general Holocaust of the war itself, through the machinations of shadowy elites who, themselves, were also Jewish (whatever that means, and whether there is really much of significance in common between the Jewish instigators and their Jewish sacrifice). There is much to suggest that this is the case and that, therefore, the stirring up and muddying of the waters through this whole noisy controversey over Holocaust denial, and the onerous ,,hate speech" laws it's facilitated, has worked effectively, as usual, to divert attention from where it could be more productively applied.

That being said, it's suggested that skeptical readers isolate their doubts about the Jewish Holocaust, as much as possible, from the Polish material which has been the primary focus here and which – without question, if you've read this far – has been sufficient to establish the humbuggery of at least one significant Truth Teller in the US patriot movement – Slick Rick "The Weasel" Adams.

Thank you, Rick, for giving us this opportunity – and the ironically "Uncensored" material that you so generously supplied – to conduct this exploration.

If our level of discourse has been raised by an increment or two through this expose, or if others have been given food for thought, then the present treatise has been worth the trouble it took to compose.

THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT.
YOU CAN DO YOUR SHARE TOO.
HELP CLEAN UP THE USA.

This piece was posted at
http://www.theinfounderground.com/
on the Current News / Urgent News forum
on May 16, 2010

UNACKNOWLEDGED LETTER TO RICK ADAMS
FROM ,,DARIUS OF PHOENIX"
May 6, 2010

Dear Mr. Adams,

I wish to thank you for having me on the air on tonight's program. I want to apologize though, for not exchanging the usual courtesies. The truth of the matter is, I had the computer with the broadcast on and did not realize you had me on till the time delay started transmitting what I was saying. Until then I thought I was talking to your associate who answered the call, killing time until you will be ready to take my call.

This is the first time I listened to RBN and I am impressed with many of the things you said, and I agree with you on many issues. The specific issue however, that the program addressed, the Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) massacre, I am sad to note, you truly are completely off on.

I am a 4th generation Polish-American, but I was born and raised the first 10 years of my life in Poland and a big chunk of it specifically in Bydgoszcz (Bromberg), - my hometown. I grew up with stories my grandmother, aunts and uncles told me about the war and its first days.

My family ties with Bydgoszcz go way back in history. The last Castellan of Bydgoszcz (end of the 18th century) in the first Commonwealth of Poland Ignacy Zakrzewski was a relative of mine. My grandfather, a professional Army Officer perished at the hands of the Germans before my mother was born, leaving his young wife (23 years old)  and child. My pregnant grandmother had to leave her house at once, warned by a German neighbor, that they are coming to get her. The whole family was on a German blacklist. Another German neighbor turned her in on the street, but she outwitted him before the SS arrived and managed to escape. She gave birth to my mother on the run hiding.

My godmother, who was eleven at that time, told me how she miraculously was saved by neighbors, from having her fingers chopped off by the Germans, for she pointed with them, at the church tower where saboteur German snipers where shooting at the city defenders, that were trying to stop the German forces. Few days later one of my uncles was dragged out of the house and shot, another was shot at the "Valley of Death", another was taken later to concentration camp at Dachau and never came back (they were, as is my entire family - 100% Polish and patriotic and that was their crime). My entire family lost everything. My mother never knew her father, my grandmother remained a widow for the rest of her life. My godmother told me how she carried my mother and went with her to villages begging for food.

I remember how my grandmother told me, how the first Sunday of their rule. The Germans lined up the city square with man, they dragged out from their homes. They were doctors, lawyers, professors, clergy and the like. Their crime was, they were educated Poles. Their German neighbors prepared lists months earlier. In a planned systematic round up, they went with the SS/Gestapo/Selbstschutz and brought them to the town square were they were shot. Some 5000 were murdered that day. Some 20 000 that September. I used to go to a college in Bydgoszcz, located in a huge building in the shape of a swastika, that was the headquarter of the "fifth column", built that way before the war. I was in the torture chambers, that later the Soviet delegated Jewry in the UB (equivalent of the Jewish run NKWD) used again on Poles after "liberation."

I well remember a story told by my relatives, confirmed by many people and famous in the city. On Sunday a priest came out to administer the holy oils (sacrament of the dying) to those in the square about to be executed. In the end the priest was also shot. As he was falling, he rested his hand with the holy oils on the wall of a church that stood there. An imprint of the hand was showing on the wall. People later gathered there and prayed. The Germans were furious and painted it over. The hand imprint came out again. They kept doing it, but the hand was there. They finally deconstructed the church. My relatives were there, they saw it!

I remember the forests near the city of Bydgoszcz, I walked as a child and the monuments for those executed in so many places. Two stand out due to numbers of those buried there "The Valley of Death" in Fordon and "Wzgorze Wolnosci (Mountain of Liberty.)" Just last Fall a priest friend of mine went to a memorial Mass celebrated by the Bishop for the souls of girl scouts (14-17 years old) that were helping direct the traffic on the far outskirts of town, assisting fleeing citizens hectically leaving Bydgoszcz as the German forces advanced. Those girls were brutally raped and killed as the Germans advanced. Their bodies are buried there.

I have a little book in Polish (I have two copies) that I can send you. Since you are a truly nice guy, just misinformed, and I care about what you think, I would be glad to translate it for you. It is some 98 pages long, but small format, some pictures and text not that dense. If you wish, I will send you the translation, chapter by chapter, as time allows. It describes in fair detail what really happened. Its title - "Bromberg's September"

From the backpage:

"Bydgoszcz had some 143 075 inhabitants in 1939, which included some 9208 Germans. During the Hitler occupation the Polish population loss in Bydgoszcz numbered some 36350 people, some 27%. Those shot to death alone were 10500.
Immediately after the city was taken over by the Wehrmacht divisions, the Poles were subjected to cruel terror, and the Goebbels propaganda spread across the globe mendacious information about the so called "Bloody Sunday", about the alleged murders committed by Poles on the Germans of Bydgoszcz in the days of 3-4 September 1939. In reality, what took place in Bydgoszcz, was the rebellion of the Hitler's V-th column. During the suppression of this rebellion some 200 - 300 German saboteurs have fallen. The German action was a deliberate provocation which was to justify the blood bath on the Polish population of Bydgoszcz that was to follow. Today countless monuments and plaques commemorate the tragic experiences of the Bydgoszcz population during the occupation years."

The many details of this account the book presents, were verified with my family members, who were first hand witnesses to many of those events, whose impact lingers on till this very day. It is bad enough when the enemy commits genocide on such a scale. It is beyond comprehension and impossible to grasp and cure, damage inflicted if he targets the genocide on the cream of the crop, the educated elite. You then target, not only physical but spiritual and intellectual destruction of a nation.

Mr Adams please consider what amazing talent, determination and strength of Spirit was necessary for a nation that as a political entity seized to exist for some 130 years, Just as it was reborn again, two years later victoriously defeated the Soviet army in 1920 (Something only the Afghanies were able to pull off again much later, although not in open conflict). That battle is considered one of the 20 most pivotal battles in history, for it truly changed history. Because of its result the Revolution in Germany collapsed. The threat of Soviet's march on the West halted.  That nation was able to rebuild in some 21 years producing people of amazing talent and education. Just to give you one name, from Bydgoszcz ... Marian Rejewski  who broke the enigma code and kept doing so throughout the war for the French, British and Americans - a fact diligently omitted and vastly unknown:  http://www.pan.net/history/enigma/
(By the way, after the war, he spent the later years of his life hiding in Bydgoszcz at a mediocre job to make sure he will not get recognized by the Commies, which would have cost him his life.)

A nation betrayed by its allies and backstabbed by the Soviets. A nation that lost over 6 000 000 of its citizens (roughly 50% Jews and 50% Polish) with its intelligencia  and aristocracy wiped out, that kept fighting anywhere there was a front to fight the Germans. A nation that never surrendered, maintained an underground army and an exile government. A nation sold again into Soviet slavery by Mr Churchill and Roosevelt at Teheran and Yalta. A nation utterly ruined by the war and decimated. A nation that throughout the Soviet occupation, despite terror and torture, retained its Christian character and Faith despite effort to crush it. A nation that not only produced a pope of the magnitude of John Paul the Great, but a Solidarity movement that swept away the Soviet empire. A nation that despite even more wicked manipulation of this day and age still manages to remain Christian and undefeated. For those very reasons, it is smeared and defamed by its
 enemies. Poland is a thorn in the eyes of the banksters and their synhedrin. Just as they attack pope Benedict XVI to silence the Church and destroy its authority, they will do anything to destroy Poland and silence its potential influence on this world gone wild.

You are a smart man Mr. Adams, you must understand that. If you put enough effort into knowing and understanding, what has happened during WWII, you will realize, that you have been genuinely misinformed and unwillingly participate in the German and Jewish propaganda discrediting on their behalf innocent people that do not deserve it. I am willing to provide you with further readings and help. Could even show you around Poland sometime next year, if you had the desire...

Thank you again and let me know if you want the book ("Bromberg's September") and its translation.
Best Regards and God bless!
Darius

UNACKNOWLEDGED LETTER TO RICK ADAMS
FROM ,,BOB OF NEW JERSEY"
May 6, 2010

Rick,

By now you've probably seen the reply that I sent to Darius and shared with some other people. I hope it didn't anger you. These issues are intensely emotional yet very public at the same time. I think that's what your program is really all about ... at its best ... isn't it?

I must acknowledge, again, that it was very big of you, and very fair-minded, to invite me on your program for the express purpose of challenging what you and your guests have said. I am deeply impressed and humbly grateful.

At the same time, I must say that your answers did not satisfy or please me, any more than the words from your own mouth which provoked me to call your show in the first place. But I know how tricky reality can be, and I've had enough experience with life to appreciate how often our own perceptions can fool us and how easy it is for our egoistic thinking minds to rush to conclusions that are absolutely mistaken. So I believe it's a wise policy to cut people some slack and tolerate some ambiguity as we search for answers to the urgently troubling and deeply perplexing questions of our age.

Nothing would make me happier than to be convinced that your motives and intentions are pure. After all, this has been my perception of you all along, at least until we stumbled upon this litmus-test Polish issue of mine. If my habitual skepticism about truth-tellers and opinion shapers turns out to be unjustified in your own case, you can surely appreciate why it's been so routinely deployed, given the general circumstances of deception and fraudulence within which we operate.

One of the observations of Norman Davies∗ that I recall from his prolific writings – I can't remember exactly where – is that perceptions of Poland in the West have been mostly informed through German sources. As you should by now be ready to concede, German opinions about Poland can be insolently false and misleading. So if you have been honestly misinformed about the matters we disputed last night, I can take this as a readily forgivable offense.

Rick, I hope you will accept this – sometimes rather heated – exchange we've had as an invitation to broaden your mind, and to open your heart.

I once heard Norman Davies* speak at the Palace of the Legion of Honor in San Francisco, back in the mid-1980s, when he was teaching at Stanford. He related the story of how he was set on the road to becoming the world's foremost non-Polish historian of Poland. He'd begun as a student of Russian history. He was on his way by train to Moscow, prepared to do research. The train got to Brest-Litovsk, on the Polish-Soviet border ... and those stupid, ham-handed commies wouldn't let him into the country. So typical of their moronic nature; look at what they threw away. He didn't know what to do. He was at an utter loss. So he just stayed in Poland ... where he became fascinated, captivated, and inspired by the Polish ethos. Perhaps you have been missing something here, and would profit

[MikeWB]

Rick Adams is bogus?  He's confused on few issues and approaches things from overly-religious point of view but he's not completely bogus. His biggest fault is that he's a  no planer like his idiot side-kick Dr. K. Dr K. is another matter... Dr K. is a charlatan, snake oil salesman and a scammer and is full of shit. He's not a real doctor, he sells bullshit cures to people in form of oils, and he's a total fool who's spreading disinfo about no-plane crap. He's also of the opinion that "Islam is the greatest", "Islam is the only salvation from jewish control", "Islam loves Christians".

I happened to catch that show on which that "Bob from NJ" came on and he came off as a total shithead and an asshole. I'd take anything "Bob from NJ" says with a gigantic grain of salt.

[VoltaXebec]

I happened to catch that show on which that "Bob from NJ" came on and he came off as a total shithead and an asshole. I'd take anything "Bob from NJ" says with a gigantic grain of salt.

RoaminLam is "Bob from NJ" if I'm not mistaken. I think this is just a pro-German verus pro-Polish issue. I'm neutral and don't listen to Adams (except for some of the exerts pointed out in this post) but I would advice the pro-Polish side to get an "expert" to fight their corner as I would guess that the vast majority of Rick Adam's listeners are pro-German and/or pro-Nazi.

I agree with Mike on the Dr.K talking head.

[VoltaXebec]

This might please you RoaminLam.

Comment number 14 from http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2010/ ... /#comments

john stadmiller over at republic broadcasting network , removed the comments section over on his website. he said something to the effect that there was too much jew bashing and jew discussion on there and he was not going to allow the rbn comment section to be taken over by white supremist and/or nazi skinhead types , etc. he said that rbn is the only patriot radio station that continues to address the "jewish question" from time to tome and that nobody else touches it. hmmmm, so now anyone who wants to talk about the jewish question is a nazi or white supremist? imagine that. this coming from a guy who used to talk about how he was all about cutting at the roots and not at the branches. let us not forget why mark glenn was fired over at afp by the overpaid do-nothing numbnutts boss of his, James P. Tucker, Jr. for daring to talk about jews all the time. it is obvious that guy just doens't understand what is really truely going on. all he does is run around chasing bilderbergers and playing tag with their security people and getting paid 6 figures a year for this silly one trick pony schtick.