Government can alter public behaviour, top adviser says

[Helphand]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11669664

  You couldn't make this stuff up.

  All, all or nearly all those named in the article below, are Jews (including, I suspect, Mr stamp of the BBC).  Why should this be the case? Why is their voice so loud?   What gives this tiny minority of psycopaths the right to dictate how UK society should be - or even be "consulted" at taxpayer expense for that matter?

  The Talmud prohibits taking the numbers of Jews, which may explain why the worldwide estimate of them numbering 2/10 of one per cent. may be slightly on the low side. But ALL persons named below in this government consultation are Jews. This demonstrates the heady heights of hubris they now exhibit before their inevitable nemesis.

  This is also a great illustration of hidden government. The front men change; Cameron replaces Brown; but Halpern who "was previously chief analyst in the No 10 Strategy Unit for six years under Tony Blair" is still there, immune to the political winds of "change"  and now chiseling away under the alleged opposition parties of government.

   *   *   *

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11669664

Government can alter public behaviour, top adviser says

By Gavin Stamp, Political Reporter, BBC News.

  The "nudge" theory of affecting social change...
...
The approach, proposed by academics Richard Thaler [Jew?] and Cass Sunstein [Jew], suggested that bad choices and laziness are a large part of what makes people human.
...

 Earlier reports mentioned the Lords committee was headed by Lord Krebs [Jew] - since omitted in the latest update.

  It has been reported that David Cameron  [proud of his Jewish "inheritance"] asked Mr Halpern to head up a "nudge unit" to look at how to use behavioural economics and market signals to persuade citizens to change their behaviour.

  He was previously chief analyst in the No 10 Strategy Unit for six years under Tony Blair  [crypto-Jew, maternal grandmother Lipsett/Lipshitz].

  The committee, whose members include the scientist Lord Winston [Jew] and former Lib Dem MP Lord Willis [name commonly used by Jews, likely a Jew], will also question senior officials from the Department of Education.

   *   *   *
  The following bears repeating from another post concerning egregious, undue Jewish influence, as it encapsulates a great truth of empirical observation.

  Michael Bradley (Jewish author, nom de plume) - The Iceman Inheritance (1978).
(From his revised edition supplement: "A frightening publication history of Jewish media suppression").
http://www.lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-L ... itance.pdf

 "And maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the
physical ones.
  Their 'chosen people' pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist
predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined 'us against them' mentality. Their higher level
of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social influence
wherever they have settled in the West.
  Their men's feelings of sexual inadequacy are a Neanderthal genetic legacy reflected in much more
frequent confusion of sexual orientation than occurs among males of other Caucasian ethnic groups and other races. It
has been the subject of too-numerous Jewish-authored books and screenplays, and Woody Allen's work (and
private life) is a very well known example of this Jewish predicament.
  This genetic Neanderthal psychosexual maladaptation has also bequeathed to Jews a tendency toward emotional
instability and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened... which is all the time when they are not in
absolute control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then. An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the
Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot (yet) control death.
  This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability
has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over the course of Western history. Their aggression encourages
continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while the emotional instability makes it difficult for most Jews to
distinguish reasonably between justified social _criticism_ by their non-Jewish neighbors and _attacks_.
  Insensitive even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence in societies, and reacting with hysterical
aggression to any such supposed 'attack' on their behavior and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have _always_
provoked violence against themselves. And then they, with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and attribute
the situation to innate 'anti-Semitism' among their neighbors.
  This tragic cycle happened most recently in Nazi Germany, of course, but it had happened previously in almost all
European countries. This historical pattern is the social result of Neanderthal _genetic_ traits of high aggression and
emotional instability caused by Ice Age psychosexual maladaptation. All this is very clear to me _now_.
  The Iceman Inheritance as published in 1978 had been written only in terms of 'Caucasians', 'Western humanity',
'white men' and so on. But with my research after the New York Times op-ed polemic of July 1992, I soon
discovered that it was really a much more relevant penportrait of Ashkenazi 'Jews'. Some other scattered
European ethnic groups share generally similar physical characteristics, of course, but not nearly so strongly and
consistently as Ashkenazi Jews.
  The Ashkenazi Jews, as a group, exhibit lingering Neanderthal traits most strongly among living Caucasians
because of Jewish prohibitions against marriage with outsiders. Their Neanderthal genes have been kept 'all in
the family', as it were. These Neanderthal genes were not diluted by intermarriage nearly as much as with most other
Caucasians."

[Wimpy]

It's quite appropriate to assess jew behavior based upon known demonstrations of it, and we have countless and well documented examples that are observable but to quote this Bradley fellow is a stretch and a half.  How can we possibly or even remotely know what sexual characteristics/confused desires a Neanderthal had?  Think man.

Regarding the jew neurosis we have enough proof staring us in the face; there is no need to drag this rank Neanderthal speculation into the equation.  May as well talk about UFO's and star lizard Annukai since both are equally speculative nonsense.

[Helphand]

The good thing about this place is we can disagree, unlike in a communist/bolshevist lockdown regime of the type that western governments seem keen to impose on us sooner than later.
I like Bradley's (aka Sackville's) comment because it reflects empirical experience in a rather abundant and graphic kind of way. And for him, a Jew, to be saying it carries greater amusement value for the detached observer of Jewish in-group conflict. His Jewish detractors will presumably attack him not on the grounds of the message but on the grounds he is a self-claimed Sephardic bashing the hated Ashkenazim upstarts - rather as they did with Freedman.
Look at it this way - it's more useful reinforcement - and memorable! And curiously, it reflects Dr. Pierce's insightful observation in "The Rubes and the Carnies" (2000):
"...they ARE quite alien in their nature. It is almost as if they had landed here from another planet."

[Wimpy]

"The Rubes and the Carnies" (2000):
"...they ARE quite alien in their nature. It is almost as if they had landed here from another planet."

I've often thought about the "Carnie or Gypsy" angle when regarding jew behavior, overall I think it fits:  Pushy but with a smile, fast talking, use of distracting words or actions, sleight of hand and intentional lies, and always attempting to part you from your money.  People should beware and fully on guard when dealing with any jew IMO.

I like Bradley's (aka Sackville's) comment because it reflects empirical experience in a rather abundant and graphic kind of way

How empirical can one be when discussing sexual and other anthropological characteristics of a species that has been extinct for 25,000 years, not to mention the fact that the archeological record is quite sparse.  Do a web search to discover the actual amount of physical data.  When it pertains to the discussion of "behavior", beyond what they ate and the types of tools they used, Neanderthal's psycho-sexual, religious or bowel movement frequency can only be projective speculation.  Aware that this may sound pedantic, I am familiar with the field of human archeology and am painfully aware of the paucity of information beyond 5,000-7,500 years ago, let alone 25,000 years ago.  Of the few times Bradley's name has popped up associated with jews/Neanderthals at other threads and sites, I get this knee jerk reaction (yeah it's personal) and feel compelled to "set the record straight".  It is a wonderful gift this thing we call imagination but when discussing jews and jew behavior there isn't a need to dig this deep for explanations, especially with a theory that is unprovable.

[DieDaily]

I feel that not only is the Neanderthal theory incredibly dumb, it kind of got inserted into the "government can alter..." topic a little sneakily. Pretty silly. Racism sucks. We can stick to facts if for no other reason than that there is no shortage of them.

Wimpy, your view seems much more measured, but when you say things like "I would use extreme caution when dealing with any Jew" that's almost equally unscientific. Personally, I would use extreme caution when dealing with any person. Fundamentalists and supremacists of any stripe, Taliban to Gentile Banker, to Evangelist, Mormon, JW, Atheist, Politician, Doctor, whatever. It's all the same.

[jai_mann]

I feel that not only is the Neanderthal theory incredibly dumb, it kind of got inserted into the "government can alter..." topic a little sneakily. Pretty silly. Racism sucks. We can stick to facts if for no other reason than that there is no shortage of them.

Wimpy, your view seems much more measured, but when you say things like "I would use extreme caution when dealing with any Jew" that's almost equally unscientific. Personally, I would use extreme caution when dealing with any person. Fundamentalists and supremacists of any stripe, Taliban to Gentile Banker, to Evangelist, Mormon, JW, Atheist, Politician, Doctor, whatever. It's all the same.

I said it once, I'll say it again: You're either a JEW, or you're a highly attitude conditioned individual. If you are the latter, then it's time to catch the fuck up. I'm leaning towards the former given your verbal behavior thus far.

[DieDaily]

I'm actually not a Jew. As far as I know, I have no Jewish ancestors whatsoever. 40% German, 40% Irish and 15% Huguenot and 5% all-around American something or another from the Ohio/Pennsylvania areas. As for being conditioned, I think not. The subject of Zionist evil has to be removed from taboo. The elephant in the room has to be discussed far and wide. As soon as that happens, it's over for the Zionist agenda. Some of the best anti-Zionist writers and activists are Jews. People like Gates and Salbuchi also make it clear that jews are waking up to the risk of "guilt by association". It's impossible for Zionists to sustain the division of Jew/Gentile and thereby hold on to their stranglehold using the fear it induces, if the hate crap stays in people pants where it belongs (or their diapers). Yet here you are dishing out their main food. These institutions can not survive the light of scrutiny; there's just no freaking way they can do that. But when you act like Jew-Klukker, boom, they can shut the lid. Lose the accros-the-board racism, and you win. People like Chamish point out the top-down, fear-based hijacking that the jews have suffered. The biggest boon the Zionists ever had was the open promulgation of rabbid jew-hate in Third Reich Germany. It made them more powerful than they ever, ever could have otherwise gotten. And more fearful, and therefore aggressive. Think, man! What about David Cole? Yet you bandy about the term "jew" like it's one-size-fits-all? Ridiculous, counter-productive, unscientific and a Mossad agent couldn't do a better job of fueling the Zionist fires. So who's the conditioned one?

[Panoptimist]

I don't even know where to begin with this guy but it's down to two things: ConCen "plant," or Jew.

Note his particular framework, constantly alluding to Zionist instilled concepts of racism and guilt. Pay close attention to the major flaw in his ideology in bringing up Germany (he gives himself away). If he was actually against "Zionism" as opposed to pushing white guilt, he would simply have known that "rabbid jew-hate" was very legitimate, was often not violent at all, and was most commonly propaganda promulgated by the German Jew Zionists when they were fingering Britian for Palestine. Jews were actually the first ones to declare open violence (war) against German nationals. If a minority, alien group of people in your own country who monopolize the media sell you out to the world, you're going to boycott their shit. Fuck, in Israel they've got Jewish only roads and they rent houses only to Jews. Americans pay for it. So the "Jew hate" is quite easy to understand.

Some of the best "anti-Zionist" writers and activists were Jews? Who? They shot Bernstein and beat Cole's ass and he's still in hiding. Who else are you talking about? ARE? Benjamin Freedman? One of a kind. Norman Finklestein? Up in the air.

So let's bring Zionism center stage. What's your proposal, friend? Explain it to me like I'm stupid, what would be the logical result of that? From whence does Zionism emerge? Did Christians create Zionism? Did Muslims invent Zionism? It was the Buddhists, wasn't it? No, wait, it was the Al-Quedas, right?

Just wondering.

[jai_mann]

I don't even know where to begin with this guy but it's down to two things: ConCen "plant," or Jew.

Note his particular framework, constantly alluding to Zionist instilled concepts of racism and guilt. Pay close attention to the major flaw in his ideology in bringing up Germany (he gives himself away). If he was actually against "Zionism" as opposed to pushing white guilt, he would simply have known that "rabbid jew-hate" was very legitimate, was often not violent at all, and was most commonly propaganda promulgated by the German Jew Zionists when they were fingering Britian for Palestine. Jews were actually the first ones to declare open violence (war) against German nationals. If a minority, alien group of people in your own country who monopolize the media sell you out to the world, you're going to boycott their shit. Fuck, in Israel they've got Jewish only roads and they rent houses only to Jews. Americans pay for it. So the "Jew hate" is quite easy to understand.

Some of the best "anti-Zionist" writers and activists were Jews? Who? They shot Bernstein and beat Cole's ass and he's still in hiding. Who else are you talking about? ARE? Benjamin Freedman? One of a kind. Norman Finklestein? Up in the air.

So let's bring Zionism center stage. What's your proposal, friend? Explain it to me like I'm stupid, what would be the logical result of that? From whence does Zionism emerge? Did Christians create Zionism? Did Muslims invent Zionism? It was the Buddhists, wasn't it? No, wait, it was the Al-Quedas, right?

Just wondering.

He's a jew. I knew it from his first post. It's an issue of pattern recognition. This is one of the reasons I really wanted the admins to make a separate folder on this site, where they could stick the threads/posts of people who are eventually outed as individuals with a primary motivation of misleading or wasting productive time. This is another opportunity to start such a folder with exemplars of verbal behavior that people can learn to recognize, and rapidly stop wasting their time on the posters.

Don't waste too much time on this guy seriously. In this unconventional war against non-jews, there are a few major functional goals that the jews have, and with respect to posting on forums, it's going to be misleading others and wasting their valuable time. Time that could be spent on learning new things or any number of productive behaviors.

Debating a jew is a complete waste of time.


EDIT: I decided to actually quickly scan what he wrote after posting. Low and behold there's the talk about fecal matter. What a riot! These jews are going to get really frustrated at some point when they can't go into a forum and pretend that they're a non-jew. LMFAO!

EDIT EDIT: BTW, this guy is no David Cole. Cole didn't try to pretend that he was a non-jew, and Cole didn't play games with communication. Outliers are always welcome, but they've got to exhibit outlier behavior, or they AREN'T an outlier.