Hitler the jew and the faked wwII

[Hexzane]

Usually, when you read that Hitler was a jew, you have only informations of suspicion about his mother, his jewish ministers and generals, etc... Sometimes, the paper is smarter and tells you that he was the creator of Israel. You can also be aware of the many discrepancies from Hitler (Dunkirk for example).

But, if you think a little bit, you fall quickly on the following inconsistency : if he was a jew, why did he sent the jews to the camps ? I don't speak of extermination of course. Everybody here knows what to think about that. I speak about the deportation itself. If he was a jew working for jewish leaders, he wouldn't have deported millions of jews into the camps.

So, you are blocked with this logical problem. But, hopefully, with the following analysis, the inconsistency is explained, and you can understand why Hitler had to be a jew. You are then absolutely sure that he was one of them.

Jewish leaders wanted to create Israel. They had made moves toward this goal since 1880. And since the 1920's, they had accelerated their actions to create Israel. Around 1920, it was clear that Israel would be created soon, near the 40's or the 50's.

BUT, they had a very big problem. They could steal the land of Palestine. It was very easy for them. But the jews were very well in Europe, stealing the wealth of the goys. So, jewish leader would have had only some thousands of jews going to Israel. And thus, the creation of Israel would have been a failure.

So, if jewish leaders wanted to have millions of jews going to Israel near 1940 or 1950, they desperately needed someone who would : steal the houses and wealth of the European jews, send them to camps, preferably in foreign countries so they would not know the language of the country.

And this leader had to be able to deport not only jews from his own country, but also from other European countries. So, he had to make wars against other European countries, and to win them for some time (before loosing when the deportation work had been done).

Jewish leaders also had to make sure that other countries would limit the immigration of jews toward them, in order to oblige jews to go to only one country : Israel.

So, of course, the rise of Hitler was not a hazard at all (and a wonderful one for jewish leaders). He was put at this place to realize the plan of the jewish leaders. And of course, he was a jew. Putting a goy at this place, with so much power would have been too dangerous for jewish leaders.

And the war was a faked one. Hitler has won at the beginning because it was planned like that ; because he had to put into camps not only german jews, but also jews from France, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Russia, etc... When the work was done, as the plan had been accomplished, Hitler began to lose the war (of course, he didn't commit suicide. He fled away and died much later).

And of course, USA and European countries refused many jews in order to oblige them to go to Israel.

The sudden and very incredible antisemitism of Stalin (who was in fact a jew), after 1942, was also planned for this goal. With Stalin being antisemitic, russian jews were pushed toward Israel.

We can think that the McCarthyism was also a part of that plan. USA couldn't be antisemitic after the war, so jewish leaders replaced that by anticommunism (European jews of that time were often communism, or communism friendly or had communist friends). Then, they were able to keep preventing jews from coming to the USA instead of going to Israel.

The fake opposition between England and the jews after the war, was also created for this reason (and also to keep feeding the paranoia of the common jews).

When you understand that, you can understand why the jews provoked World War I. When you watch the map of the middle east before the war, you see the big turkish empire. After the war, the empire has collapsed and is replaced by many countries of small and medium importance. It's sure that the turkish empire was a big problem for zionist leaders : 1) for the creation of Israel 2) and after that, for is survival (having medium or little countries in front of Israel is better than having a big empire). So, it's obvious that they had to destroy it before in order to be able to create Israel. WWI was also made to create the preconditions of the rise of Hitler and USSR, which were themselves preconditions to the creation of Israel.

[Hexzane]

I have already presented the plan behind ww2. They have put the jew Hitler in power in order to oblige everyday jews to go to Israel. After losing everything and being in the suddenly hostile USSR after the war, the choice of going to Israel seemed a quite good deal for them.

But jewish leaders were obliged to make a plan in two parts. They couldn't have a Hitler all of a sudden. And for their ww2 plan, they had to control every important countries. And it seems that, in 1914, Russia was not into control yet. Great Britain was, France was, USA were, Germany and Austria most probably were. But it seems that it was not the case of Russia.

Or maybe it was. But they had to justify the future hatred against jews and Russia (which had become communist at this time) from the future nazi government. So, even if it was in control, they had to destroy the Russian government and to replace it by a one with a very visible domination from jews.

So they had to create a first European war in order to create the conditions of success for the ww2 plan.

So, with ww1, they were able to :

1) Justify the rise of Hitler because of the Versailles treaty, the poverty caused by the war (and by the jews after the collapse stocks markets of October 1929), the supposed stab in the back from jews in 1918, and the communist-jewish menace from USSR.

2) Justify the war against the now communist and dominated by jews USSR in 1940.

3) They were also able to create the condition of existence for Israel in the middle-east. The Turkish empire was too big and too powerful for the future Israel. They had to split it into several pieces in order to have only countries with little or average size and power. With ww1, they were able to justify the collapse of the Turkish empire in 1920.

[Hexzane]

There are many things which are much too shady about Hitler and which sustain the idea is was jew working for more powerful jewish leaders and that all those events were faked and planned.

1) First of all, in a country dominated by jews as was Germany during the 20's and the 30's, it would have been impossible for a hostile goy like Hitler to come to power. When they control a country, jewish leaders don't let hostile goyims take back the power. So, the rise of Hitler is unbelievable, especially in such a short period of time.

2) The reaction of Hitler about Dunkirk is also incredible. He can capture the entire English army. But what does he do ? He let them flee. What !!? And the Hitler's pretext is that he had a great respect for England ! Wtf !!? No, only a traitor acts like that. A real nazi would never have done that.

He did that because he was a zionist jew. And as the war was a fake one, he had to let the english army flee. Otherwise, England couldn't have continued the war. And the USA couldn't have made the D-day and won the war with the USSR as it was planned.

3) Hitler knew a two-front war was something he had to avoid at all costs. He told many times that it was that which had lead to the defeat during WWI. But what does he do ? He attacks USSR before having destroyed England, thus creating a... two-front war.

4) Hitler doesn't invade the strait of Gibraltar, which would have made him the master of the Mediterranean sea, thus preventing the battles of north Africa, and also the invasion of Italy and of the south of France. The communication lines between England and its empire (like India), would have been much more extended.

Maybe he would have been obliged to invade Spain also. But without the threat of an invasion in the south of Europe, he would have been able to remove troops from other areas, like Greece. And as Spain was exhausted by the war of 1936 (which had ended in 1939), it would have been very easy to defeat it.


Another one than myself has seen other discrepancies :

5) "The Jew Hitler refuses to even feint an attack on Britain to draw the British navy to the channel, were it could be obliterated by aircraft".

Very relevant. England could prevent a landing with their fleet. But their fleet could have been destroyed by the german aircraft.

6) "The Jew Hitler declares war on the U.S., even though he was no more obliged to declare war on the U.S. than Japan was obliged to declare war on the Soviet Union, which Germany had been fighting since June 1941. Japan never declared war on the Soviet Union."

7) "The Jew Hitler (against the advice of all his generals) single-handedly saves Moscow by ordering army group "Center" to stop its advance on Moscow".

"The Jew Hitler tells the Soviets an attack will occur at Kursk. The Jew Hitler delays the attack for more than four months, until the Soviets have built defensive lines eight deep. The Soviets concentrate 1,300,000 soldiers with 3,600 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces, including 6,000 76mm anti-tank guns, and 2,400 aircraft in and around Kursk. An attack anywhere other than Kursk would be fatal for the Soviets, but the Soviets seem to know that the attack will come only at Kursk."

They knew it because the war was a fake one, planned by the jewish leaders.

9) "The Jew Hitler orders German troops to attack the most heavily defended lines ever constructed, at Kursk".

"The Jew Hitler is amazed by the supermen of the elite SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte, who, in the south, break through all eight defensive lines and take on the Soviet reserve tank battalions".

"Less than two weeks into the offensive, worried that the Liebstandarte might win the battle for the Germans, the Jew Hitler strips this elite group of their tanks and ships them to Northern Italy, where they sit on their hands for some months before returning to the eastern front. The pretext of the Sicily invasion is used".

As there was enough jews in the concentration camps, Hitler's mission was over, and then, he had to loose the war. And the unexpected success of the SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte was not at all a part of the plan. So, he sent them far away.

And, of course, it was not because he was caring for his troops. In many other occasions, orders were to be killed rather than retreating.

This stupid strategy of being killed rather than retreating was also a part of the jewish plan. With an elastic defense, the war could have last two or three more years. But jewish leaders didn't need the war anymore. So, Hitler had to choose a stupid strategy which would accelerate the end of the war.

10) "The Jew Hitler refuses total mobilisation of the German people, even though the munitions factories cried out for manpower and all his enemies had recruited woman into the work force. The Jew Hitler never bothered to use half the potential German labor force."

11) "And do you think (the Jew) Roosevelt would have forced the Japanese into the very destructive Pacific war, if he hadn't been certain Hitler would declare war on the United States? How was Roosevelt so sure Hitler would declare war on the United States. What if Hitler had just said, "Piss off, Roosevelt. Enjoy your little war against Japan." Then Roosevelt would have ended up just fighting the Japanese without being able to drag the United States into direct participation in the European war. ..... and it goes on and on ..... instance, after instance, of Hitler single-handedly losing the war for the Germans (and winning it for the Jews)."

[Hexzane]

I have discovered recently another discrepancy. It's about the armistice treaty between Germany and France after the defeat of French armies in 1940.

The treaty is quite bizarre. Hitler let a free zone for French people in the south of France (representing nearly half of the French territory) and he let them their colonies. The french armies were completely defeated. So, he could have invaded the entire territory of France and said "now, all your possessions belong to me". French government couldn't have said anything to that. But no, he decides to let a free zone. And he decides also to let them their colony. A very strange clemency.

But, when you know Hitler was a zionist jew and you observe the north African map, you understand why Hitler the jew did that.

France possessed colonies at this time in north Africa. They possessed Tunisia, Algeria, AND Morocco. And Morroco is at the south side of the strait of Gibraltar.

So, if Hitler had decided not to be clement, and to take every French possessions and territories (by a imposed treaty), he would have also taken Morocco. And then, he would have controlled the strait of Gibraltar. Spain controlled a thin band of the north of the Morocco territory, but the French territory was largely near enough of the strait of Gibraltar to let Hitler be able to control it without invading the Spanish protectorate. But Hitler could have also invade the Spanish protectorate. Spain couldn't have stopped the German armies.

And what would have happened if Hitler had controlled the strait ? Germany would have controlled the entire Mediterranean sea, and all the north of Africa. Then, they wouldn't have had to keep large forces in the the south of Europe and in north Africa. they could have invade Iraq an take his oil. England would have been very far from his Indian colonies.

And at this time England was unable to prevent this from happening. So, there was nobody to stop Hitler from invading French (and eventually Spanish) Morocco.

Thus, as Hitler was a jew, he had to show such a strange clemency toward France, and to let them keep the south of France and all their colonies. Without this clemency, Germany would have been stronger and England weaker. And it would have been longer to finish the faked wwII. Or the events would have been less coherent and thus less believable.

It also explains why the German armies didn't rush toward Morocco (and didn't installed a simple defensive line against English armies. English armies which would have been defenseless once the strait of Gibraltar controlled, because of a lack of supplies) instead of trying to obliterate English armies when they decided to fight in north Africa (February 1941).

So by not invading Morocco in 1940 and in February 1941, Hitler let England the time to rebuild their forces and to be able (with the USA), to invade Morocco. And all this was planned from the beginning.

[mgt23]

i was on RBN saying hitler was a jew/worked for the jews and got roasted by some listeners and then had it out with Piper the following day that suttons book wasnt the only proof. The real smoking gun apart from your well constructed answer is him giving the Wittgensteins special dispensation; Ludwig Wittgenstein being arguably the 20th centurys most influencial philosopher in jewish circles, part of the richest steel magnates in germany and weirdly went to the same school at the same time as Hitler.

[Panoptimist]

Thanks, been wanting to read about this.

[Hexzane]

Thanks. It is very sympathetic to be on a forum attended by smart people. It changes from some other forums or blogs.

[Whaler]

Great post. Very good argument and valid theory. I wouldn't put it past the Zionists to do this. Hitler was perfect for thier agenda. He was pretty much a godsend for the zionists. They still are using him for thier PR campaigns and to legitmize Israel....

[GordZilla]

I lot of good info here, makes me think for sure. Good post.

I would like to see some more references, cause so far, besides the conjecture above, although aptly appearing, there really isn't too much to be found on the subject. That of Hitler being Jewish. There is a lot of here say and a few books by a few Jews and crypto Jews, but other than that unfortunately this topic has remained rather shallow, especially considering the weight it holds. I, for one, am not convinced one way or the other. I do admit, however and as stated above, this is certainly something to consider in light of your point by point analysis. I do wonder though why he exposed the Jew for his true nature to masses of people - even using well produced documentaries about the Jew that argue some of the same points as we do today. Seems an odd course of action.  I do think that a hostile Goy , as you put it, could rise to power in the political environment that Germany held at the time when he did rise to power.  That could have happened, as word of mouth and  public speeches etc were still very effective in gaining votes. Now, of course, in our times you need the media on your side, but back then this wasn't as necessary. Mike Piper argues the blood line of Hitler doesn't paint him as a Jew, I don't know enough about this to comment one way or another. I do, however, think they could have used anybody to do Hitler's job if he was indeed a puppet, and I think there would have been much better choices, ones that wouldn't let so much verboten information out about the Jew but could have focused instead on instilling the fear of God in them. For instance they could have used Stalin, as they did paint him in western media as being very unfriendly to Jews (even though that wasn't the case, to sell it to nations of people would not have been too hard, and to scare Jews themselves -also easy.) This would also have helped Communist Russia grow to even a larger size and faster, pushing even more 'frightened' Jews to Israel. There were other choices even with in German parliament that could also be used as a 'Hitler' without having to reveal so many hidden and devilish aspects of the Jew to the majority of the German populace. Many better choices.

There are other points to consider too of course; He fought in the first world war and was nothing more than a grunt, and although it does happen - a Jew in the army as nothing more than a mere grunt- it is fairly rare to see. His book Mein Kempt  does seem to smack of a God fearing Christian's words more than that of a Jew, written in a prison -another place Jews are rarely found, even more rare than the army.  

Seems to me he was sincere in his beliefs. He saw his country sold out after the first world war. He saw the Bolshevik Russian uprising first hand, he was fond of writings such as Henry Ford's and others who we are also favourable towards today.  

Frankly I myself am not sure about his origins, but I don't think anyone really can be with what we have to go on. From where I stand he could easily be a Zionist puppet working for the creation of Israel as it could be he was just a sincere well spoken gentile with an incredible will to see real justice through for the German people. The latter- for a Jew- is completely unbelievable; that a Goy could be such a great leader and man. The story of him being a Jew, in my opinion, only serves today's Jews as it helps cause more confusion and divide within our own resistance.

The sad part is; one hundred years from now it's very likely someone will stumble upon our research and declare that it's very likely , say 'Ognir' or 'Cracksmoke', we're also Jews, and there'd be little information  to counter such a claim a century from now.

I will not make my mind up on this topic without something very definitive to make me take a side one way or the other, and it would have to be absolutely definitive  in the climate of deceit we find ourselves in today.

If you have something that definitive I invite you to share it, if you don't I would caution you on being too sure of yourself, in either direction, when speculating on the most lied about man in history. (well maybe Jesus is lied about more, a topic for another day :-) )


P.S. another point to add; if Hitler was indeed a puppet , then the concentration camps would really be extermination camps, as that would really instil the fear necessary in the Jews to have them flee to Israel. As it was, even despite the ample warnings and urgings of Hitler's government to vacate Germany, many Jews chose not to. A good puppet would have actually ran those camps as extermination camps and really get the Jews out fast. It took deceitful propaganda about Hitler from the western powers to paint this picture for the world that he was indeed this horrible monster (and most of this propaganda came after the fact, also that would have not been necessary if Hitler would have just done his job and started exterminating Jews right away leaving lots of evidence in his wake) . If the Zionists were wise they would have chose a real monster who would have no problem with the mass extermination of millions to achieve the optimal effect -say again , like Stalin. Hitler was not this monster, again an odd choice.  If you believe he was and the extermination camps were indeed real then yes Hitler was a good choice. A 'good choice' however would have left credible evidence of such atrocities behind, making it absolutely undeniable that mass extermination of the Jews really did take place. If that were the case Israel would have double the population it has today, easily.  More of his speeches and writings would include such rhetoric as well, as it is now there is virtually nothing that supports the idea that Hitler's plans were 'mass extermination', just as there wasn't then either.  The Jews hardly feared him in WW2, they hated him sure, but feared? I don't think so. He could've done much better on that front. A puppet, in my opinion, would have. If the goal was to get Jews to Israel and fast I still maintain they could've chose better.

I still lean more to the opinion that although the war was probably unnecessary, the struggle the German people had to endure was not. They were decimated after the first unnecessary war, they had to rebuild and it only took one , anyone, to speak some sense about national pride and the injustice of international banking to rally them for support, in that climate the people were hurting for such a leader and very willing to throw their support at him/her.

[Hexzane]

With this new interpretation of those events, we can also understand why wwI lasted 4 years. In fact, in Europe the goal of the war was to create revolutions in Russia and Germany. And the plan of jewish leaders was to explain them by the fact that people were fed up with the war. So the war had to last quite a long time in order to explain revolts from people. It had to last at least 3 years to explain in a convincing way the Russian revolution.

But, as the Russian revolution allowed Germany to transfer its armies from the east to the west, thus increasing greatly his forces against French/English armies, the war needed to last longer than 3 years. German armies had to win some more times in 1918 before beginning to lose. And they had to begin to lose. Because otherwise, the German revolution wouldn't have been believable. A revolution when a country is winning, it is quite bizarre. It's less bizarre when it is loosing. So, this added nearly one year of war after the Russian revolution.

In fact, jewish leaders ended the war quite too quickly, because the change in the balance of forces was too quick to be honest. In marsh 1918, German armies got reinforcements from east troops. Between marsh and July 1918, they were still able to make large breakthroughs. But, suddenly, in august, it was finished. The allies were making German armies retreat everywhere.

Anyway, with Germany beginning to retreat a little bit, they were able to launch the German revolution (in 10/30/1918 at Kiel). Once again, this operation was done too fast not to be something staged. In only 12 days, the revolution had succeed and Guillaume II was fleeing toward Netherlands (11/10/1918). In fact, it was even better than that. Because, until the 11/6/1918, the revolution was limited to Kiel. So, in only 4 days, the revolution had succeeded and Guillaume II was fleeing. A little to incredible.

But they were obliged to end the war very quickly. Because as jewish leaders like symbols and numerology, they wanted to finish the war the 11/11/1918 (number eleven is important for them, as we have known it since 9/11 events). They were pressed by their agenda.

And they were obliged to have a revolution in Germany in order to explain the rise of Hitler. Without it, the empire would have been still in place, and Hitler couldn't have come to power (since there would have been no election for supreme power). Or it would have been much difficult to explain. Jewish leaders were obliged to have a republic to be able to have Hitler as the chancellor 15 years later.

The revolution also allowed them to end the war sooner. Without it, they would have been obliged to have a military victory. And it would have been much longer (may be 1 or 2 more years). Or it would have been less logical.

The revolution also permitted jewish leaders to advance the stab in the back theory, which made German people hostile toward jews. This was another explanation of the rise of Hitler.

So, in fact, the war lasted a long time not because the defense was too strong at this time (thus preventing any breakthrough into the enemy lines), but because jewish leaders needed it to last enough time to be able to explain de Russian and the German revolutions.

And all those stupid bloody attacks with only a gain of 1 or 2 kms and 100.000 deads each time were also made with the goal of justifying the discontent from troops and also civilians. And thus justifying Russian and German revolutions.

[GordZilla]

I feel a little ignored, I guess nothing I posted had any relevance to the topic, but please if you are going to continue with this story unabated by what anyone proposes to the contrary please at least offer us a bone or two, a source maybe that we can follow. As I am sincerely interested in the truth of the matter, but I've got nothing to go on here so far. Although your story line is very intriguing I still can't source it to anything, and I'd really like to be able to.  I too would like to get to the bottom of it and it's seems you are already there, so please share your information on how you arrived at these conclusions. Again I admit a lot of them make plenty of sense, I'm not trying to be insulting, I think it would be good for all of us to be able to defend our conclusions- if they are challenged. So if one day I reach the same conclusions you have, and challenged , I'd like to be able to say "see page 567 of so and so's book, account, documentary etc "

 I understand some of what you stated here is logical conjecture, and it does seem to be a solid argument. I'm not trying to take away from that, I'm just trying to solidify my own opinion of these events.  I'm still on the fence about Hitler's origins, this is where I'm especially interested. As for the wars being fake, or drawn out unnecessarily long, well I agree with you on that, but maybe not for the reasons you propose.

[Hexzane]

I don't understand very well what kind of references you need. Everything I say doesn't pose any problem of references. Almost all events I analyze are very well known and are in average history books. I offer just a new interpretation to known events. So, your need of references is completely irrelevant.

Dunkirk is well known, the fact that jewish leaders wanted to create Israel is well known, the fact that European countries and the USA shut their doors to jewish immigration is well known, McCarthyism is well known, the fact that Hitler deported jews into camps is well known, the split of the Turkish empire in 1920 is well known. Etc, etc... So, what's the problem ?

And about your ideas concerning some discrepancies if Hitler was a jew, I will answer to them later.

[GordZilla]

I don't understand very well what kind of references you need. Everything I say doesn't pose any problem of references. Almost all events I analyze are very well known and are in average history books. I offer just a new interpretation to known events. So, your need of references is completely irrelevant.

Dunkirk is well known, the fact that jewish leaders wanted to create Israel is well known, the fact that European countries and the USA shut their doors to jewish immigration is well known, McCarthyism is well known, the fact that Hitler deported jews into camps is well known, the split of the Turkish empire in 1920 is well known. Etc, etc... So, what's the problem ?

And about your ideas concerning some discrepancies if Hitler was a jew, I will answer to them later.

References particularly pertaining to this;

I'm still on the fence about Hitler's origins, this is where I'm especially interested.

I'm not sure if he was a Jew, like I said before much of what you posted makes logical sense but it would be nice to have affirmative proof one way or another on the topic of Hitler's genealogy. That is the coffin's nail to the rest of the points you made, sure he could just be a mason or a shabbos Goy, but to give his life for this cause? BUT if he were a Jew then yes everything else falls in line. That's why I feel it's such a pivotal point.

[Hexzane]

References particularly pertaining to this;

I'm still on the fence about Hitler's origins, this is where I'm especially interested.

I'm not sure if he was a Jew, like I said before much of what you posted makes logical sense but it would be nice to have affirmative proof one way or another on the topic of Hitler's genealogy. That is the coffin's nail to the rest of the points you made, sure he could just be a mason or a shabbos Goy, but to give his life for this cause? BUT if he were a Jew then yes everything else falls in line. That's why I feel it's such a pivotal point.

With the theory I have presented, we don't need this information. We have enough clues to be sure he was one of them. With the "why", we have also the "how", and the "who".

The main questions are "did the jewish leaders wanted to create Israel near the middle of the 20th century ?". The answer is yes. "Would millions of everyday jews have voluntarily come to Israel ?". The answer is no. Only some dozens of thousands would have left their very comfortable situation in Europe come to Israel. Then "was Hitler, and after that, the bad conditions of life in the USSR, the solution to oblige everyday jews to come to Israel ?". The answer is yes. "So could the rise of Hitler have been an incredible hazard ?". The answer is obviously no. "Then, could have he been a goy". The answer is clearly no. The operation was too important for jewish leaders to give the leadership of it to a goy.

Eventually, you could suppose he was a Freemason. But if you think two minutes, the conclusion is "no". First, even if he had been a freemason, he would have been considered too young and then not enough reliable by jewish leaders. He was only 31 in 1920, when he began his career of nationalist. For such a mission, if they had chosen a freemason goyim, they would have at least chosen a very old one. Someone who would have already given sufficient proofs of loyalty and reliability.

But the main reason is that for such an enormous an crucial operation, jewish leaders would never have left the power to anybody else than a jew. And probably a jew coming from a very high jewish family.

But we will never have this information, I mean, an information we can be totally sure about. Because this kind of information is in the hands of the jews.

Of course, there are informations about the theory he maybe the son of a Rotshild. The fact that his granddaddy's name was Schickelburger (a jewish name). But all those informations can come from jewish sources. Thus, it can be a psyop operation made with the goal of making people doubt during some times, and then to tell them all those informations were false.

The fact that there is a grave of a jew name Adolf Hitler is maybe the more convincing one. But maybe it's another lie.

But they can't lie with the main events. And this is with the analysis of those main events that we can be sure Hitler was a jew.

[mchawe]

I am with Good Goyim on this one. Without a good look at Hitler's family tree with explanation, there is no way I would stick my neck out on this !  It is conceiveable that the treacherous Bormann, Hitlers closest adviser might have been a Jew or a crypto Jew. The plan was definitely to push the Jews out of Germany thus playing into Zionist hands. There is evidence that the Nazis were financed by Bechtel and including a Bush family connection, and indeed the armaments factory of IB Farben was never bombed even though Churchill managed to bomb Dresden killing thousands of innocent civilians. So there are a number of discrepancies. One of which is the word Ashkenazi itself. But that does not mean that Htler had to be a Jew.
Hitler is known to want to continue the British Empire, so why not the French as well ?  He knew that the Soviet Government had been entirely set up by Talmudic Jews and I believe that was his primary target, but the English and American Jews bringing their host countries into the war didn't allow him the freedom to over-run that target.
Reading Mein Kampf, one definitely gets the impression that he saw the Jews as a real problem for Germany.
It could have been that the machinations of world Jewry and their secret societies simply played him to perfection.

[Hexzane]

Some other thoughts.

We can think that the holocaust story was created in order to be able to create Israel just after the war. Ok, this is something some people are aware of. But we have used to focus so much about the other reason (make the goys feel guilty) for 20 or 30 years, that this is something which has been quite forgotten. And I think this was the main reason for this invention.

In fact, they were able to steal Palestine easily. But it was much better for them to have a justification. And the holocaust was the justification. As they were supposed to have suffered so much, it was thus logical for people (goys) that England accepts to give them the Palestine. Without the holocaust, why England would have done that ? And if they have done it, it would have been very suspect.

Pushing everyday jews toward Israel by making them thinking they would avoid a possible other holocaust or other persecutions was probably the third reason. But it was probably the least important (being for most of them in the not fun at all USSR with all their properties and money destroyed or stolen during the war was probably a powerful enough reason to go to Israel).

We can also understand that the colonization of the Middle-East by England and France was necessary during the 20's. It has allowed the country controlling Palestine (England) to give it to jews. If Palestine had become an independent country after the split of the Turkish empire, it wouldn't have been possible. Jews would have been obliged to steal it coldly, to invade an independent country. And they would have appeared as the bad guys. With England giving it to them, there was no problem of that kind.

And for that, the Turkish empire had to be the enemy of the triple entente (the allies) during wwI. It permitted to justify the occupation of some of the former Turkish empire territories after wwI.

[mchawe]

This video by Jim Condit Jr is worth watching in its entirety but he taks about Hitler's possible Jewish anticedents from about the 18th minute. Including the theory that he was the grandson of one of the Rothschilds.
[googlevid]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6759022809518563654&q#[/googlevid]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 8563654&q#

(Can't get the dang thing to embed !

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Dont know what to think about all this stuff. Either way, it leaves Hitler discredited. Hitler was a Jew=bad, Hitler killed 6 million=bad. Seems he was destined to fail.

[mchawe]

Hitler's big mistake was to issue a national currency. That was a big No No if you got your financing from the Rothschilds ! In fact it is a big NO NO if you do it anyway. Maybe why Kennedy was asassinated

[Hexzane]

On other forums, there are people saying it's the jews who have brought this idea of Hitler being jewish in order to depress nationalists and to confuse the issue. I think most of the people defending this idea are cryptos who are trying to make things even more confused and who are trying to prevent people to believe Hitler was a jew. But it is possible that some gullible people believe it.

But, this idea is absurd.

If Hitler was what he seemed to be (a nazi and a goy), jews would have no interest at all into making people believe he was a zionist jew.

All they have to gain, is to make some nationalist and truth seekers feel depressed. But not very much, since we now know that jews control almost everything. So, for most of them, it wouldn't be very strange or depressing.

People who would eventually feel depressed would be they most stupid ones. The ones who listen stupid music and drink beers (the skinheads). The rednecks of nationalism. But what is the usefulness of making them depressed ? None. It's useless.

And telling them that Hitler was jew could be dangerous, because, it could awaken them. It is more interesting to let them believe Hitler was a super goy who fought jews, and maintain them in a sterile nostalgia.

And there is no interest in introducing confusion when a lie is working so well and nobody has any doubt about it. And as jewish leaders have never introduce the idea of Hitler being a jew before 2007 or 2008, we can say they never had any intention of introducing such a king of confusion in the mind of goyims.

However, from the side of drawbacks, it's quite huge.

- Suddenly, there is no more culpability from nationalists about wwII.
- Jewish leaders are now the ones who are guilty of what happened during wwII.
- Of course, it supports very strongly the idea that there was never any holocaust
- About everyday jews, it introduces the idea that their leaders betrayed them. It's perhaps the worst problem for jewish leaders.

So, it's obvious that they had no interest at all to suddenly bring up the idea that Hitler was a zionist jew. People would suddenly think it was the jews who where behind wwII, the dozens millions of people killed, deportation of jews, and so on... Whereas they would never have had this idea before that. It would invents tons of problems where there was none.

But, if Hitler was really a jew working for jewish leaders in order to help creating Israel, things are completely different.

With the arrival of Internet, a lots of secrets where jews are involved are now revealed : 9/11, Apollo landings, communism and the jews, economic domination from jews, media domination from jews, new world order, and so on... It's a cataclysm for the jews.

So, there was a threat that Hitler being a zionist jew would be revealed one day or another. Probably that when jews have begun to talk about it, some goys had already begun to reveal this secret.

And this secret is so huge that it absolutely must be kept hidden. But with Internet, it's impossible.

So, the only solution for jews were to talk about it, but in such a way that it wouldn't be believed by people hearing it. They had to give only few informations in mainstream medias. Most of those informations had to be quite fragile. They had to be refutable in some way in order to make people have doubts about their validity. On Internet, those informations had to be often given by known crypto-zionists. And of course, they had to flood Internet with articles in order that articles made by real truthers (and real goys) would be relegated in the 25th page of Google. So, they had to organize a control damage strategy.

And this is exactly what we have been able to observe.

This information has been given in many newspapers or on tv-news (so on medias controlled by jews). It was even given in Israeli's medias. In this cases, of course, there wasn't many informations given. All what was said was Hitler would have been a Rothschild's son. So, something which would like a mad conspirationists trip. And of course, those articles were phrased in a such a way this thesis was ridiculed. Other articles were more anecdotal. They just said that maybe Hitler was the son of a jew and so, is antisemitism would be explain by self-hating.

This thesis also had to be preached in a more convincing way, and with more arguments and details (but not too much) for a more conspirationist public.

And, once again, this is what happened. Websites written by notorious cryptos like Alex Jones have begun to publish articles or videos about the fact that Hitler wasn't what he seems to be. All this without bringing many logical arguments. It was more "revelations". And of course, some of those revelations were contradicted by other "revelations" from mainstream newspapers or websites (for example, the Hitler's dna would refute the idea of his jewish origin). Those articles are more advanced than the ones you can find on mainstream websites, but they keep having flaws.

And of course, when people sustain the good theory (that Hitler was a zionist jew helping to create Israel) on conspirationist or nationalist forums, jews need to send cryptos sayanims in order to prevent less advanced people to begin to adopt this theory.

And this also what is happening. You can defend the idea that jews control everything on some nationalist forum. But when you say you believe Hitler was a zionist jew and the wwII was faked, you have always suddenly 4 or 5 people saying you are a mad conspirationist. On many conspirationnist forums you can say that there are people from Alhpa Centauri living with us. Nobody will find this idea ridiculous. But if you say that Hitler was in fact a zionist, suddenly, once again you have 4 or 5 guys on your back saying it's bullshit. And of course, this is when the admin is not a crypto himself. In this case, your topic is often closed after two or three pages (when it is not simply deleted).

So, on one side (if Hitler was realy a nazi goy) we would have an absurd tactic from the jews. On the other side (if Hitler was a zionist jew), a control damage action from jews is perfectly logical. And it is what we can see happening.

[Hexzane]

I am with Good Goyim on this one. Without a good look at Hitler's family tree with explanation, there is no way I would stick my neck out on this !

Once again, I don't understand very well.

It's as if for 9/11 you were demanding a paper signed by the director of Mossad himself and George Bush admitting they were responsible of the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. This, in order to accept to believe it was made by jews. Of course you will never have it, because those proofs are in the hands of jewish leaders. Does that mean that, until we have such a proof, we shouldn't believe it was jews who are responsible of those attacks ? It would be ridiculous. We would wait forever.

We don't wait for such a proof because we have enough clues to be sure jews are behind the 9/11. And it's exactly the same thing with Hitler being a jew.

The rise of Hitler and the WWII were staged by jews, and of course Hitler was a jew. As if jewish leaders would have use a goyim for this role. And more than that, a real nazi, someone believing really to what he was saying ! They would have been fool to do such a thing.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I'm with Gord on this as well.  

The theory that "Hitler was a Jew" has been tossed around TIU before.  I think he wasn't.  Hitler above all was a Pan-German nationalist and had lived in poverty in his hometown of Linz of which he hated the layout of the town according to the only trustworthy book on Hitler's youth ("The Young Hitler I Knew").  The book never mentioned him walking around anything Jewish in his hometown or visiting Jewish Gravesites of his ancestors. In fact, he was very upset at having a job offered to him by a Jew.  From my research, this book is a first hand account, written solely for posterity and has little for me to doubt about it.  

Okay let's get to work on this. First and foremost---Hitler was not Jewish nor was he working for Jews as an active participant. He was fighting them but was eventually defeated by them.  I think his arrangements for Work Camps and Expulsions of Jews from the Ghettos were no different than what happened to "domestic enemies" in the Boer-War, Afghan War, US Civil War and in some areas of WWI. It was a policy but wasn't directly to help "Zionists".   Jewry was a collective "political" enemy of Nazi Germany as were pacifists and communists. Germany had almost become a Soviet state in 1919 which Hitler saw first hand. If anything, at the end of WWII, Hitler likely realized that the entire build up of the war was ruse by Jew Bankers and Jew Henchmen (Roosevelt/Churchill).  Ramsay's "The Nameless War" doesn't indict Hitler but shows how Germany and Italy as "Fascist countries" that fought Global Communism... were set up for the fall. I believe Hitler was a dupe much like Napoleon who found out too late they indirectly furthered the interests of Global Jewry instead their own "nationalist" or "imperial" interests. :
------------------------

1) First of all, in a country dominated by jews as was Germany during the 20's and the 30's, it would have been impossible for a hostile goy like Hitler to come to power. When they control a country, jewish leaders don't let hostile goyims take back the power. So, the rise of Hitler is unbelievable, especially in such a short period of time.

Not true. The path of Hitler's rise through Germany was a difficult path with many setbacks, political losses, treachery, violence and murders.  He started merely as a man on a street corner shouting about the "Jewish Question" in Germany as it related to the Socialist and Communist movements.   The book by Richard Evans, "The Coming of the Third Reich" outlines how Hitler and his small band of supporters fought Jews and Communist thugs in the streets, thereby, gaining notoriety for themselves as an Anti-Bolshevik political party.  In fact from the early 1920s up until 1933, Hitler's party had little cash reserves and were often making the rounds for political donations when funds ran low. He often hit up "Nationalist" supporters for donations. Nor was his group the only "National Socialist" party in Germany. It had competition.  

2) The reaction of Hitler about Dunkirk is also incredible. He can capture the entire English army. But what does he do ? He let them flee. What !!? And the Hitler's pretext is that he had a great respect for England ! Wtf !!? No, only a traitor acts like that. A real nazi would never have done that.

He did that because he was a zionist jew. And as the war was a fake one, he had to let the english army flee. Otherwise, England couldn't have continued the war. And the USA couldn't have made the D-day and won the war with the USSR as it was planned.

I don't know what you mean by "real Nazi"  I think Hitler didn't want to engage in war with Britain, nor did the German High command desire to have Germans soldats killed in a "Trench" fighting near the beaches if a Blitzkreig could not be carried to ocean shores. The "details" over Dunkirk are not so clear cut. Hitler at this point likely wanted to defeat Britain not destroy her BEF on beaches. The British did a decent job of just "disappearing" across the Channel as Hitler and his Generals made strategy.  

Firstly, although Heinz Guderian and Rommel, commanders of the German mechanized units, were keen to push on and destroy the British on the beaches, this was impractical.Their troops were exhausted, many of their vehicles in need of refit and repair, and they were short of supplies and understrength due to breakdowns and losses earlier in the campaign. Further, getting through to the beaches involved fighting through the town of Dunkirk itself, still being vigorously defended by 3 British divisions which Churchill ordered must not surrender - in any circumstances - until the evacuation was complete. Urban areas are not ideal for tank operations, particularly without infantry support, and the German infantry divisions were still too far away to participate in the operation.

Hitler therefore ordered the German armoured formations to halt (26 May). This halt order was influenced by the senior German commander in France, von Runstedt. He disliked Rommel and Guderian, seeing them as insubordinate and taking too many risks. Hitler was also influenced by Goering, who assured Hitler his Luftwaffe would prevent any evacuation through air attacks.

No one expected that the British would be able to improvise an effective evacuation fleet, and the RAF was able to break up many Luftwaffe formations before they could attack the evacuation fleet. So, although many British vessels were damaged or sunk,the fleet was able to evacuate the bulk of the forces on the beach. It's also worth pointing out that Hitler rescinded the halt order as early as 28 May, when the evacuation began, but the armoured formations (despite 2 days rest and refit) were unable to break through to the beaches before the evacuation was completed (on 4 June), a good indication that even without the halt they wouldn't have been able to prevent the evacuation.

Finally, although the British got the troops away from Dunkirk, all their vehicles, heavy weapons, and supplies were left behind (AKA AS A MAJOR DEFEAT). One British soldier I talked to said he got back to England with the top half of his battledress, and nothing else. Within a week, he'd been sent to dig in on Ramsgate beach - with 5 rounds of ammunition. Nobody believed the British army was in any condition to resist a German invasion in June 1940 and thus continue the war, so capturing the British army at Dunkirk was not a pressing priority in German High Command eyes at the time anyway.

3) Hitler knew a two-front war was something he had to avoid at all costs. He told many times that it was that which had lead to the defeat during WWI. But what does he do ? He attacks USSR before having destroyed England, thus creating a... two-front war.

This is an obvious miss.  Germany was set to be invaded by Stalin in the late Summer of 1941 likely in August.  Hitler launched Operation Barbarrossa in June 1941 in a pre-emptive attack on the USSR.  While they had conducted drills together and worked together on military exchanges in prior years, it was a matter of both forces learning the military conduct and depth of each other in the early and mid-1930s.  
 

4) Hitler doesn't invade the strait of Gibraltar, which would have made him the master of the Mediterranean sea, thus preventing the battles of north Africa, and also the invasion of Italy and of the south of France. The communication lines between England and its empire (like India), would have been much more extended.

Maybe he would have been obliged to invade Spain also. But without the threat of an invasion in the south of Europe, he would have been able to remove troops from other areas, like Greece. And as Spain was exhausted by the war of 1936 (which had ended in 1939), it would have been very easy to defeat it.

This also is a miss. This sounds like you watched Jim Condit's DVD.  Condit has interesting finds but this is just a hypothesis that "politically" would not have worked. Also new details have emerged in 2008 that were not available at the time of Condit's DVD.
1. Spain was neutral after the Civil War of '36. Though nominally on the side of the Axis powers, Spain likely did not want to be joined with them due to her own large coastline nor was she in a position to be "supplied" by German-Italy if she had to face a UK blockade. Spain was geographically isolated and could face an invasion if she joined Hitler.
2. Churchill had paid Franco millions to stay neutral. This came out in papers in 2008.
3. Franco and Hitler did not agree on setting military guns on the Canary Islands or the Gibraltar straights. Franco wanted concessions from Germany both military and economic for allowing a post there.   Hitler decided against it.
4. Physically, Spain was not in a position to engage in warfare with Britain due to the Civil Wars. She still had internal concerns which might allow Stalin-Russia to re-engage remaining underground forces there. Also no Navy:

But the cost of victory came at a heavy price for Franco and the Nationalists. The Spanish economy had been ruined by the savage war and international embargo imposed by the other democracies. Spain's gold reserves were squandered in the purchase of arms, food, and medical supplies. These purchases filled the coffers of Joseph Stalin, who took advantage of the Republican government's isolation, selling them arms at many times their true cost, while also helping consolidate power within Spain to communist parties loyal to the COMINTERN and Moscow. At least half a million people had died during the civil war, with millions more fleeing the country as refugees. Despite the new European war threatening to engulf Spain, Franco disbanded much of his military so they could fill in for workers and farmers, and so restore the country's wrecked economy; but this blunted Spain's military potency. In addition, Spain's navy was all but destroyed during the war, with the very few major warships available needed for naval or coastal defense. But Spain did aid Germany during the war both economically and militarily. As many as 45,000 Spanish troops did volunteer for what is known as the Blue Division (División Azul), which saw combat in the Eastern Front.

Hitler and Franco met at Hendaye on 23 October 1940 to fix the details of an alliance. By this time, the advantages had become less clear for either side. Franco asked for too much from Hitler. Among Franco's demands in exchange for entering the war alongside the alliance of Germany and Italy, Franco, among many things, demanded heavy fortification of the Canary Islands as well as large quantities of grain, fuel, armed vehicles, military aircraft and other armaments. In response, Hitler threatened Franco with a possible annexation of Spanish territory to the Vichy France. At the end of the day, no agreement was reached. A few days later, Hitler would famously tell Mussolini, "I prefer to have three or four of my teeth pulled out than to speak to that man again." It is subject to historical debate whether Franco overplayed his hand demanding too much from Hitler for Spanish entry into the war or if he deliberately stymied the German dictator by setting the price unrealistically high. Also, Abwehr chief Wilhelm Canaris, who secretly relayed information to Franco about the German plans, might have convinced Franco not to agree to Hitler's demands.

Spain relied upon oil supplies from the United States and the US had agreed to listen to British recommendations on this. As a result, the Spanish were told that supplies would be restricted, albeit with a ten week reserve. Lacking a strong navy, any Spanish intervention would rely, inevitably, upon German ability to supply oil. Some of Germany's own activity relied upon captured French oil reserves, so additional needs from Spain were unhelpful.

From the German point of view, Vichy's active reaction to British and Free French attacks (Destruction of the French Fleet at Mers-el-Kebir and Dakar) had been encouraging, so perhaps Spanish intervention was less vital. Also, in order to keep Vichy "on-side", the proposed territorial changes in Morocco became a potential embarrassment and were diluted. As a consequence of this, neither side would make sufficient compromises and after nine hours, the talks failed.

In December 1940, Hitler returned to the issue of Gibraltar. He attempted to force Franco's hand with a blunt request for the passage of German troops to attack Gibraltar. Franco refused, citing the danger that Britain still presented to Spanish colonies and choosing to wait until Britain "was on the point of collapse". Hitler got tougher and offered grain and military supplies as an inducement. By this time, however, Italian troops were being chased from Cyrenaica and the Royal Navy had continued to show its freedom of action in Italian waters. Britain was clearly not finished. Franco responded "that the fact has left the circumstances of October far behind" and "the Protocol then agreed must now be considered outmoded".

According to Franco's own autobiography, he also met with Italian leader Benito Mussolini in Bordighera (12 February 1941)[3] at Hitler's request. Hitler hoped that Mussolini could persuade Franco to enter the war. However, Mussolini was not interested due to the recent string of defeats his forces had suffered in North Africa and the Balkans. At one point, Franco asked him: "Duce, if you could get out of this war, would you?" At that point Mussolini raised his arms and said: "If only I could."

Thus ended diplomatic efforts to persuade Spain to join the war or to allow free passage to the Axis.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Hexzane,

You're missing a lot of detail in your analysis without citations. "Hitler was a Jew" is mostly pushed by Jews, cryptos and some Muslim anti-Westerners. Inevitably, these accounts show a weak understanding of the geo-politics of WWII.  The War was engineered by Jews but it wasn't necessarily "led" by Jews as you want to have us believe.  Hitler only became Anti-Jew because of the Jewish Scams, Politics and Threats he saw from them in Austria and later Germany.  If he had all of this "Jewish" backing, then why did he live hand to mouth for so long even as a Nazi in the 1920s?  It doesn't follow.


------------
"One day, an Englishman will come along and write my biography. But it cannot be an English man of the present generation. They won't be objective. It will have to be an Englishman of the next generation, and one who is totally familiar with all the German archives" Adolf Hitler (anticipating David Irving)

"Of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews" - Louis Marschalko (author of "The World Conquerors: the Real War Criminals")

"In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it." - Louis Marschalko, "The World Conquerors : The Real War Criminals."

"The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." - Rabbi M. Perlzweig (head of the British Section of the World Jewish Congress), Toronto Evening Telegram, February 26, 1940.

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." - Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942.

"We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry... Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." - Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.

"Played golf with Joe Kennedy (U.S. Ambassador to Britain). He says that Chamberlain stated that America and world Jewry forced England into World War II." - James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy (later Secretary of Defense), Diary, December 27, 1945 entry.

"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling first World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America." - Adolf Hitler, April, 1945.

The joke doing the rounds of the British Union of Fascists at this time was that the Jewish national anthem was, 'Onward Christian Soldiers.'

[Hexzane]

Of course, many events from the 20's and 30's were made with the goal of pushing people to vote for Hitler.

1) The German revolution was made of course to provoke a change of government (empire to republic). But the secondary goal was to create a hatred from goys toward jews with the theory of the stab in the back defended later by the nazi's. And of course, it allowed Nazis to present communism and jews as enemies to German people.

2) The treaty of Versailles and the reparations were made to make German people displeased and to make them feel discontent toward English and French governments.

3) the hyperinflation of 1923 was voluntarily created in order to ruin a part of the upper middle class, and so, to make them very angry. The other goal was probably to  suppress the debt of the German government. Being liberated from the debt, it was then easier for them to make a rearmament (also with the help of jewish money).

We can find in Wikipedia informations about the fact that hyperinflation was very favorable to Hitler.

"Although the inflation ended with the introduction of the Rentenmark and the Weimar Republic continued for a decade afterwards, hyperinflation is widely believed to have contributed to the Nazi takeover of Germany and Adolf Hitler's rise to power. Adolf Hitler himself in his book, Mein Kampf, makes many references to the German debt and the negative consequences that brought about the inevitability of "National Socialism". The inflation also raised doubts about the competence of liberal institutions, especially amongst a middle class who had held cash savings and bonds. It also produced resentment of bankers and speculators, whom the government and press blamed for the inflation.[16] Many of them were Jews, and some Germans called the hyperinflated Weimar banknotes Jew Confetti".

4) The Ruhr invasion in 1923 and 1924 (officially made to oblige German government to pay the reparations), was another action made to produce discontent in the German population.

5) Same thing, the stock market crash of 1929 and the great depression which followed were made, among other things, with the goal of provoking the ruin of the German upper middle class, the impoverishment of the middle class and also provoking a massive amount of unemployment, thus creating even more discontent.

6) All the informations about the involvement of jews in the Russian revolution were given to increase the resentment against jews. We can notice that after 1940, when nazism was no more necessary, suddenly, we haven't informations about the jews in USSR anymore. Some people will say it's because jews were expelled from power by Stalin. But when jewish leaders have the power, they never let it go so easily. So, it's obvious that jews were still possessing the power after Stalin. And then, we should have informations about them.

[Hexzane]

About arguments from Gordzilla and CrackSmokeRepublican (and others), here is my answer.

There are six types of argument

1) Hitler made good thing for goys. So, he can't be a jew

2) Hitler gave jews a hard time. So, he can't be a jew.

3) Hitler's history showed he was not rich when he was young and other things like that. So, he can't be a jew.

4) History of nazi movement was not a pleasure cruise. Thus, it couldn't be a jewish thing.

5) Hitler fought during WWI and was wounded two times. Thus, he can't be a jew.

6) Hitler won the Iron cross. Thus he can't be a jew.


1) About 1, it was not a problem for jewish leaders to let Hitler be good for goys, because everything was meant to be temporary.

And Hitler had to be good for goys. It helped jewish leaders to explain why Hitler was able to be so much followed by German people. And it helped them to make German people feel guilty after the war. It also helped to explain why Germany was able to rearm so fast.

And, if you go ther, we can also say that the prosperity of the 1945-1970 era means jews were not dominating at this time, which we know is false.

2) Of course Hitler was supposed to be a little hard against jews. Otherwise, he wouldn't have been credible.

3) You know what ? Jews lie to goys.

And for such an important operation, they had to make it believable. So, they had to make people believe Hitler was actually a goy. And with Hitler being the Furer of Germany, and also as jews were already the masters of medias, it was very easy for them to invent false stories about Hitler. So, all the details we know about Hitler's young life are irrelevant as proofs of Hitler being a goy, since they may have been entirely invented by jews. We can't rely on that to conclude to the jewishness of goyness of Hitler.

So, testimonies or books from people who are supposed to have known Hitler during his young days, don't mean anything. As testimonies about the holocaust don't mean anything.

It's as if we relied on "proofs" given by the police of USSR (which was then entirely dominated by jews) to conclude about the fact that "the protocols" were either a false document or were actually written by jews.

4) Same thing than for 3. Of course it had to not be a bed of roses in order to be credible.

But it was not so difficult at all. This movement was a very small group in 1920. Only 13 years after that, Hitler was the chief of the government.

However, once again, jews lie. So, it is perfectly possible that jews have invented many of those stories about the difficulties of the nazi movement in order to make it's story more credible.

5) Same thing than for 3 and 4. Jews lie. And all we know about Hitler during WWI may have been completely invented.

However, even with the official story, things don't seems to have been so hard for Hitler. He was not a fighter in first line. He was a just a dispatch runner, taking messages back and forth from the command staff in the rear to the fighting units near the battlefield. So, a quite cool place with few danger. And if Hitler was a jew, it's a place where it was possible to manage that nobody knew where he really was.

The stories about him being wounded may have been purely invented. Or, if it was true, it may have been false or artificially provoked wounds. Probably that jewish leaders pushing Hitler felt that going through the war without a scratch would have been too incredible and so, too suspicious. They also must have felt that being wounded would make him pass as a very brave man, so it would be good for it's future political career. Thus, they managed to insert two stories of wounds during WWI.

6) About the iron cross, it was a jew who helped him to get it. So, this fact is far from disproving the jewishness of Hitler.

[o1OpTiMuS1o]

This video by Jim Condit Jr is worth watching in its entirety but he taks about Hitler's possible Jewish anticedents from about the 18th minute. Including the theory that he was the grandson of one of the Rothschilds.
[googlevid]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6759022809518563654&q#[/googlevid]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 8563654&q#

(Can't get the dang thing to embed !

To bad that info came from a      :down:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

looks like thirdeyewise already has several sockpuppet accounts going  

you come here and the only thread you make is about Hitler being a Jew and didn't expect us to know it's you ?  :shock:  how dumb do you think we are ?  :lol:

[Hexzane]

looks like thirdeyewise already has several sockpuppet accounts going  

you come here and the only thread you make is about Hitler being a Jew and didn't expect us to know it's you ?  :shock:  how dumb do you think we are ?  :lol:

My friend, if I was a jew, there would be three or for other jewish guys (having already posted 300 or 400 messages) supporting me. It's the way jews act. Many against one or two guys.

Is it the case ? No. It's the contrary. I am alone against many guys who disagree with me. So, who is (are) the jew(s) here ?

[Hexzane]

One other discrepancy :

The pact between Hitler and Stalin is absurd. Jewish communists collaborating with an antisemitic nazi ? It's pure nonsense.

It's probably also for this reason that jews have invented the story of Stalin having become quite antisemitic. Otherwise, it would have been completely illogical. With Stalin making purges against jews and thus, being hostile to them, it was possible to explain this pact.

The other main reason of the sudden and incredible anti-Semitism of Stalin was to push jews to leave the USSR after the war and go to Israel. If USSR had still been the paradise for jews it was before Stalin, no jews from USSR would have wanted to go to Israel.

If jewish leaders have kept secret the presence of jews at the head of the soviet power after 1940, it is also to explain why USSR was no more favorable to jews. If jews had still dominated the USSR, people wouldn't understand why Stalin did this.

The other big reason is that jewish leaders hide their real power. They don't want goys to know that 80 or 90 % of the leaders of a country are jews. So, as they didn't need goys to know the power of jews in USSR anymore, they hide it once again.

This is why, suddenly, after 1940, it seems there was no jews anymore at the head of the soviet state. Which is completely incredible. We know that when jews have the power, they don't let it go. So, USSR was certainly still dominated by jews after 1940.

And of course, if jewish leaders have let some newspapers and some writers reveal the massive presence of jews at the head of the USSR state during the 20's and 30's, it was to give another reason to the rise of Hitler, and for the fight between Germany and the USSR. Those revelations were meant to be only temporary.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

looks like thirdeyewise already has several sockpuppet accounts going  

you come here and the only thread you make is about Hitler being a Jew and didn't expect us to know it's you ?  :shock:  how dumb do you think we are ?  :lol:

My friend, if I was a jew, there would be three or for other jewish guys (having already posted 300 or 400 messages) supporting me. It's the way jews act. Many against one or two guys.

Is it the case ? No. It's the contrary. I am alone against many guys who disagree with me. So, who is (are) the jew(s) here ?

Is this the only issue you came here to discuss, the Jewish slander of "Hitler was a Jew" ? it seems this is the only thing you anti-Hitler cultists show up to talk about, ever. There's zero evidence Hitler was a Jew and/or working for them. All there is is some suspicions based on a loose collaboration between the Nazis and a few Zionist groups in Germany to transfer some Jews to palestine in the mid-30s, who promptly returned to Europe. How is propagating this nonsense helping us defeat the jew world order as Hitler literally attempted to do ?