Hitler the jew and the faked wwII

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

One other discrepancy :

The pact between Hitler and Stalin is absurd. Jewish communists collaborating with an antisemitic nazi ? It's pure nonsense.

It's probably also for this reason that jews have invented the story of Stalin having become quite antisemitic. Otherwise, it would have been completely illogical. With Stalin making purges against jews and thus, being hostile to them, it was possible to explain this pact.

The other main reason of the sudden and incredible anti-Semitism of Stalin was to push jews to leave the USSR after the war and go to Israel. If USSR had still been the paradise for jews it was before Stalin, no jews from USSR would have wanted to go to Israel.

If jewish leaders have kept secret the presence of jews at the head of the soviet power after 1940, it is also to explain why USSR was no more favorable to jews. If jews had still dominated the USSR, people wouldn't understand why Stalin did this.

The other big reason is that jewish leaders hide their real power. They don't want goys to know that 80 or 90 % of the leaders of a country are jews. So, as they didn't need goys to know the power of jews in USSR anymore, they hide it once again.

This is why, suddenly, after 1940, it seems there was no jews anymore at the head of the soviet state. Which is completely incredible. We know that when jews have the power, they don't let it go. So, USSR was certainly still dominated by jews after 1940.

And of course, if jewish leaders have let some newspapers and some writers reveal the massive presence of jews at the head of the USSR state during the 20's and 30's, it was to give another reason to the rise of Hitler, and for the fight between Germany and the USSR. Those revelations were meant to be only temporary.

got anything more solid than conjecture and your own fanciful interpretation of events ? so far plain old conjecture and guesswork is the brunt of "Hitler was a Jew" theorists' arguments. they don't seem to think that physical evidence is required to prove something.  :think:

[Hexzane]

Is this the only issue you came here to discuss, the Jewish slander of "Hitler was a Jew" ?

Even if it was the case, what would be the problem ? People write about what they want on a forum.

it seems this is the only thing you anti-Hitler cultists show up to talk about, ever.

You mean that criticizing Hitler is being anti-Hitler, like for example... criticizing jews is being an anti-semite. Strange rhetoric for a goy writing on this kind of forum.

How is propagating this nonsense helping us defeat the jew world order as Hitler literally attempted to do ?

Are you kidding me ? You mean that if Hitler was a jew, it wouldn't be important and wouldn't be worth discussing it ?

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Is this the only issue you came here to discuss, the Jewish slander of "Hitler was a Jew" ?

Even if it was the case, what would be the problem ? People write about what they want on a forum.

I don't think you understand the circumstances here. I suspect you might be a sockpuppet account of another former member who spent 1.5 years of his time on this forum running his mouth about Hitler being a Jew and nearly nothing else. We don't allow people to make 30 different troll accounts trying to stir up shit. This "debate" is getting old and has been going on for years on and off.

it seems this is the only thing you anti-Hitler cultists show up to talk about, ever.

You mean that criticizing Hitler is being anti-Hitler, like for example... criticizing jews is being an anti-semite. Strange rhetoric for a goy writing on this kind of forum.

Why would you criticize Hitler if he opposed Jews unless you are one yourself ? The Jews have been "criticizing Hitler" non-stop for 7 decades to the point where his name is now synonymous with evil. Why do their dirty work for them unless of course you are one of them ...   :problem:

How is propagating this nonsense helping us defeat the jew world order as Hitler literally attempted to do ?

Are you kidding me ? You mean that if Hitler was a jew, it wouldn't be important and wouldn't be worth discussing it ?

You can say hitler was a Jew all you want, you'll never have any evidence beyond big-foot style conjecture. You might be a Jew ... isn't that worth discussing ? If you enjoy attacking the reputation of a dead man, have at it. this is a complete waste of time that leads nowhere ...

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Okay Hexzane, this is a Big miss.  Let's blow this misinformation apart.

5) Same thing than for 3 and 4. Jews lie. And all we know about Hitler during WWI may have been completely invented.

However, even with the official story, things don't seems to have been so hard for Hitler. He was not a fighter in first line. He was a just a dispatch runner, taking messages back and forth from the command staff in the rear to the fighting units near the battlefield. So, a quite cool place with few danger. And if Hitler was a jew, it's a place where it was possible to manage that nobody knew where he really was.

The stories about him being wounded may have been purely invented. Or, if it was true, it may have been false or artificially provoked wounds. Probably that jewish leaders pushing Hitler felt that going through the war without a scratch would have been too incredible and so, too suspicious. They also must have felt that being wounded would make him pass as a very brave man, so it would be good for it's future political career. Thus, they managed to insert two stories of wounds during WWI.

He was awarded the Iron-Cross TWICE and was injured in several battles he participated in. He was definitely in range of the shells and general death on the front.

Hitler served in France and Belgium in the 16th Bavarian Reserve Regiment, on the Western Front as a regimental runner. He was present at a number of major battles on the Western Front, including the First Battle of Ypres, the Battle of the Somme, the Battle of Arras and the Battle of Passchendaele.[

Hitler was twice decorated for bravery. He received the relatively common Iron Cross, Second Class, in 1914 and Iron Cross, First Class, in 1918, an honour rarely given to a Gefreiter.[36] Yet because the regimental staff thought Hitler lacked leadership skills, he was never promoted to Unteroffizier (equivalent to a British corporal). According to Weber, Hitler's First Class Iron Cross was recommended by Hugo Gutmann, a Jewish List adjutant, and this rarer award was commonly awarded to those posted to regimental headquarters, such as Hitler, who had more contact with more senior officers than combat soldiers.[37]

Hitler's duties at regimental headquarters gave him time to pursue his artwork. He drew cartoons and instructional drawings for an army newspaper. In 1916, he was wounded in either the groin area[38] or the left thigh[39] during the Battle of the Somme, but returned to the front in March 1917. He received the Wound Badge later that year. German historian and author, Sebastian Haffner, referring to Hitler's experience at the front, suggests that he had at least some understanding of the military.

On 15 October 1918, Hitler was admitted to a field hospital, temporarily blinded by a mustard gas attack.

Catholic School Days in Austria: (might be why Condit floated this "Hitler is a Jew" theory???  I bought it at first for awhile but then did more research... :think: )

His father's efforts at Hafeld ended in failure, and the family relocated to Lambach in 1897. Hitler attended a Catholic school located in an 11th-century Benedictine cloister, where the walls were engraved in a number of places with crests containing the symbol of the swastika.[19] It was in Lambach that the eight-year-old Hitler sang in the church choir, took singing lessons, and even entertained the fantasy of one day becoming a priest.[20] In 1898, the family returned permanently to Leonding.

His younger brother Edmund died of measles on 2 February 1900, causing permanent changes in Hitler. He went from a confident, outgoing boy who excelled in school, to a morose, detached, sullen boy who constantly battled his father and his teachers.[21]

Hitler was attached to his mother, though he had a troubled relationship with his father, who frequently beat him, especially in the years after Alois' retirement and disappointing farming efforts.[22] Alois wanted his son to follow in his footsteps as an Austrian customs official, and this became a huge source of conflict between them.[18] Despite his son's pleas to go to classical high school and become an artist, his father sent him to the Realschule in Linz, a technical high school of about 300 students, in September 1900. Hitler rebelled, and in Mein Kampf confessed to failing his first year in hopes that once his father saw "what little progress I was making at the technical school he would let me devote myself to the happiness I dreamed of." Alois never relented, however, and Hitler became even more bitter and rebellious.

German Nationalism quickly became an obsession for Hitler, and a way to rebel against his father, who proudly served the Austrian government. Most people who lived along the German-Austrian border considered themselves German-Austrians, but Hitler expressed loyalty only to Germany. In defiance of the Austrian monarchy, and his father who continually expressed loyalty to it, Hitler and his young friends liked to use the German greeting "Heil", and sing the German anthem "Deutschland Über Alles" instead of the Austrian Imperial anthem.[18]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolph_hitler

[/tab]

.
.

Let's see if this formula/blueprint had precedents in any way:

A "White" of european descent who seemingly was against the jewish bank elite but in reality was under their control ?

Well, we can really find thousands of examples, but I'll  present this one:

A notable advantage of J.P. Morgan's work for the House of Rothschild was the carefully cultivated belief that Morgan, if not openly "anti-Semitic", avoided participating in operations with Jewish banking firms, and that his firm would not hire anyone of Jewish background. It was the same deception which Nathan Mayer Rothschild had hired Morgan's predecessor, George Peabody, to perform in London. It was a traditional belief on Wall Street that if you wished to deal with a "gentiles only" firm, you went to J.P. Morgan; if you wanted a Jewish firm, there were a number of houses available, but the most influential, by far, was Kuhn, Loeb Co. In either case, the customer was never made aware that he was dealing with an American representative of the House of Rothschild.

The World Order A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism
The history and practices of the parasitic financial elite -- by Eustace Mullins, 1984

http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=WorldCh01-1

[/size]






.
.

[Fester]

Here's an interesting excerpt from Carr's Pawns in the Game in which he claims that Hitler was a moderate contending with radical Nazi forces with plans congruent with the Commie terror program.  Carr is devoted to the notion that the global problem is NOT essentially Jewish, but it's a fine book even if that position seems dubious.  Bolding added.  If anyone has further info on this question, thanks in advance.

When Hitler and Mussolini first rose to power they advocated the moderate Fascist policy which demanded that the wrongs done their countries be rectified; that they contain communism;  and curb the powers of the Illuminati who controlled finance and industry.  But as time went on, both Hitler and Mussolini came under the influence of the leaders of the hard core of Nazi War Lords who claimed the only way to establish a permanent peace in the world was by military conquest.  The Nazi leaders sold the top-military leaders in Italy and Japan solidly on the theories and plans advocated by Karl Ritter in 1849.  Franco in Spain refused to go along with their totalitarian plans.  His religious beliefs convinced him that an ideology which denied the existence of an Almighty God was doing the work of the Devil.

The Totalitarian minded leaders in Germany, Italy, and Japan were determined to use Fascism to further their secret Long Range Plans in exactly the same way as their opponents, the international bankers, used Communism.  The immediate plans of the War Lords were to first, defeat the Stalin-controlled Empire;  second, wipe out Communism in Europe;  third, consolidate the control of the Axis Powers on Continental Europe;  fourth, invade Britain and France and subjugate the people, and fifth, to invade and conquer the United States by using two vast pincer movements.  Japan was to land invading forces on the west coast of Mexico in the south and in the Northwest Territories in the north.  Germany was to invade Canada by air in the North and the German-Italian forces were to jump the Atlantic from Africa, and attack the U.S.A. from South America and the Gulf of Mexico.

The Northern invading forces were scheduled to join together at a point in the vicinity of Chicago and push on down the Mississippi while the South-West and South-East invasion forces were to meet at New Orleans and push north up the Mississippi, thus dividing the country into two halves.[1] With the conquest of Britain and the United States the Nazis planned to exterminate the Jews living in these two countries as they had exterminated those they located in Europe.  The international bankers, and big capitalists controlled by them, were listed for immediate liquidation, together with confiscation of all their assets and estates.

While Hitler suffered imprisonment prior to 1934 because he was considered the personal enemy of the Nazi War Lords and the international bankers, he wrote Mein Kampf.  On the very last page he stated:  "The party (National-Socialist) as such stands for positive Christianity but does not bind itself in the matter of creed to any profession.  It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and without us."

In 1933 Hitler also announced his policy in regard to Britain.  He pointed out that Marx, Lenin, and Stalin had all repeatedly reiterated that before International communism could reach its final objectives, Britain and her Empire had to be destroyed.  Under these circumstances Hitler said:  "I am willing to help defend the British Empire by force if called upon." Of the Treaty of Versailles Hitler wrote:  "It was not a British interest (intention) but, in the first place, a Jewish one to destroy Germany."  He also wrote:  "Even in England there is a continual struggle going on between the representatives of British States' interests and the Jewish World dictatorship.  Whilst England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the Jew to-day is a rebel in England and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be started there also."

Hitler never wavered from his personal opinion that the survival of Germany as a great power depended upon an alliance with the British Empire.  In 1936 he instituted proceedings to try to bring about this alliance.  He arranged for unofficial conversations to take place between German and British diplomats, and after the meetings failed to produce the alliance he so greatly desired, he said:  "No sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England's alliance.  It would have meant renunciation of our colonies;  and importance as a sea power;  and refraining from interference with British industry by competition."[2]  He considered all these German concessions would have been worthwhile if only he had been able to bring about the German-British alliance.  His failure to bring about the British Alliance caused him to weaken in his opposition to the totalitarian ideology as advocated by the extreme Nazi War Lords.  

The failure of the conference convinced Hitler that no moderate policy would ever break the control the international bankers had over British Foreign policy.  He reluctantly began to concede that Karl Ritter had been right when he said:  "The power the Jewish financiers hold over Communism must be destroyed, as well as of those who are members of the world revolutionary movement, before peace and economic freedom can be restored to the world."

The purpose of this book is to record the events in history which provided the 'Causes' which produced the 'Effects' we experience to-day.  We are not concerned with the 'Rights' or 'Wrongs' of the decisions made by individuals, except to judge for ourselves whether the decisions furthered the Devil's Plan or were in accordance with the Plan of God.  The only value of historical research is to obtain knowledge of how, and why, mistakes were made in the past so we can try to avoid making similar mistakes in the future. The momentous meeting regarding the possibility of an alliance between Great Britain and Germany took place in January 1936.  Lord Londonderry represented the British government and Goering, Herr Ribbentrop, and Hitler, Germany.

An authority on this phase of history informed me that Herr Goering and Herr Von Ribbentrop outlined the history of the World Revolutionary Movement to Lord Londonderry, explaining the detailed research work done by Professor Karl Ritter and others.  They reasoned that the only successful way to fight a totalitarian-minded conspiracy was to use Total War.  They explained to Lord Londonderry their plan was to attack all Communist-controlled countries;  liberate the people, and execute all Communist traitors.  They claimed the only way to wipe out Communism was the extermination of the whole Jewish Race.[3]  They produced masses of documented evidence which, they claimed, was authentic, to prove Communism was organized, financed, and directed by powerful,wealthy and influential Jews, who also organized, financed and directed secret ambitions to bring about the Messianic Age.[4]

Hitler is said to have promised that he would continue to oppose the extreme totalitarian plans of the Nazi War Lords and confine his activities against Communism to Europe, providing the British government would enter into an alliance with Germany.  When Lord Londonderry said he doubted if the British government would take part in a plan to abolish Communism, which called for 'Genocide,' Hitler compromised.  He said Germany would undertake the task alone provided England would enter into an agreement that the two countries would under no circumstances war against each other for ten years.  Hitler argued that the only way Britain, France, and Russia could shake off the unbearable and ruinous burden of ever-increasing national debts was to repudiate them and restore the issuing of money to the government where it originally and rightfully belonged.

Hitler is said to have pointed out that the purpose of his National-Socialist party ... call it Fascism ... was to put an end at once, and all time, to the power and influence the international money-lenders exerted on national and international affairs by reason of the fact that they were forcing every nation that still claimed to be independent, further and further into their debt.  He is said to have quoted what Benjamin Disraeli made one of his characters say in his famous book Coningsby, "So you see, dear Coningsby, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."[5]

Goering is said to have backed up the Führer by pointing out that history had proved that the wealthy and influential Jews had obtained economic and political control of every country into which they had infiltrated by using illegal methods and corrupt practices. Herr Von Ribbentrop is reported to have supported Goering's arguments by reminding Lord Londonderry that as recently as 1927-28 when he was in Canada, the Stevens Royal Commission into the Canadian Customs Service proved that the country was being robbed annually of over ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS by smuggling and other kinds of illegal traffic and trade organized and directed from an International Headquarters.  He pointed out that evidence placed before the Royal Commissioner had proved that in order to get away with gangsterism and licentiousness to 'Fix' thousands of public servants and hundreds of government officials, even as high as cabinet level.  He pointed out that what had been absolutely proved to exist in Canada was ten times as bad in the United States of America.  

Ribbentrop reasoned that the only way to clean up the mess was to 'Get' the three hundred men at the top who were 'The Secret Power' master-minding the negative forces whose various evil influences, and criminal activities, all furthered the Long Range Plan of those who directed the World Revolutionary Movement.[6]

Goering is said to have reviewed once more the part the international bankers had played in bringing about, directing, and financing the Russian revolution in 1917, which had enabled them to bring into existence the adverse conditions being experienced throughout the world at that time.[7]

Hitler reminded Lord Londonderry of the millions of Christians who had been ruthlessly slaughtered in the Communized countries since October, 1917, and argued that the men responsible could not be considered as anything else than international gangsters. The final item of discussion was the manner in which Stalin had been instructed to turn Spain into a Communist dictatorship.  The whole pattern of international intrigue was laid bare.  The manner in which Germany had been enabled to secretly re-arm:  The way French politics were controlled by Grand Orient Freemasonry.[8]  The manner in which Britain had been persuaded to disarm, while her potential enemies were being re-armed. According to the Germans, it would be impossible for the world to enjoy peace and prosperity as long as those who directed the World Revolutionary Movement insisted on fomenting wars in order to create conditions favourable for revolutionary action.  They argued both international Communism and political Zionism had to be stopped and the movements ended at once, or another war was inevitable, because the Secret Powers, pulling the strings, were determined they were going to reach their ultimate objectives.

Hitler was a great orator, and my informant claimed he ended the discussions with a plea that Lord Londonderry return to England and persuade the British government to join in the suggested alliance with Germany "because I am convinced that the British Empire and the Roman Catholic Church are both universal institutions, the continuance of which is absolutely essential as bulwarks for the preservation of law and order throughout the world in the future."

What has been said here of Hitler is so absolutely foreign to the general idea that the following historical facts and documents are quoted to support what has been said :

Lord Londonderry returned to London following the conference and made his report to the British cabinet.  On February 21st, 1936, he wrote Herr Von Ribbentrop.  He referred to the conversations he had had.  The letter reads in part :

"They (Hitler and Goering) forget that here (in England) we have not experienced the devastation of a revolution for several centuries...  In relation to the Jews ... we do not like persecution, but in addition to this, there is the material feeling that you are taking on a tremendous force which is capable of having repercussions all over the world ... it is possible to trace their participation in most of these international disturbances which have created so much havoc in different countries, but on the other hand, one can find many Jews strongly ranged on the other side who have done their best, with the wealth at their disposal, and also by their influence, to counteract those malevolent and mischievous activities of fellow Jews."[9]

After Hitler realized his hopes to bring about an alliance between Germany and Britain had failed, he leaned further and further to the 'Right.'  He became convinced that it was impossible for an individual, groups of individuals, or even a single nation to break the power and influence the international bankers exercised over the so-called democratic nations by reason of their financial control and the encumbrance of their national debts.

In July, 1936, the Spanish Civil War broke out and Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were drawn closer together.  It was the fact that Franco had had to start a Civil War in Spain to prevent Spain being Communized without a struggle, that caused Hitler to round out his boundaries and concentrate military power on his borders.  He was determined to make sure that Stalin, who he knew was only the agent of the international bankers appointed to rule over Russia, would not extend his dictatorship over other European countries.  Every step Hitler took in the direction was termed 'Acts of aggression' by the anti-Fascist press.  Hitler explained such moves as 'preventive' wars or occupations.  He stated that he was primarily concerned in 'preventing' Stalin establishing his sphere of influence on or about the 40th parallel of latitude in Europe.  If he was allowed to, Germany, Britain, and other northern European countries would be entrapped like flies in a spider's web.

Hitler had not only failed to bring about the British alliance, but he had earned the enmity of the Nazi War Lords who advocated totalitarian methods for solving the very complicated and dangerous problem.  They did not want an alliance with England.  They did not want to see Christianity flourish.  They did not agree with Hitler's "preventive" measures.  They didn't agree with anything Hitler did to hinder their plans to wage 'Total War,' first against Russia, then against Britain and France.  The 'hard core' of the pagan Nazi War Lords demanded that Hitler take offensive action, as the best defence against gradual encroachment by Communist underground and Stalin's armed forces.  When Hitler refused to go all the way with them, they decided to get rid of him.  The first attempt was made on his life.  The Nazi War Lords next tried to weaken the control he had gained over the German people. They launched a campaign to sell their Aryan Pagan ideology to the German people.  They taught the superiority of the Aryan Race.  They advocated war to establish the undisputed supremacy of the Aryan State.  They made it a fundamental principle that all men and women of Aryan blood should give unlimited obedience to the Head of the Aryan State and acknowledge no mortal as above him.  This campaign was attributed to Hitler, and the anti-Fascist press throughout the world cried to high heaven that Hitler was a pagan, and a Black-shirted totalitarian-minded Nazi War Lord.  Thus started the clashes between both Catholic and Protestant clergy and the state.  The clergy condemned the Nazi ideology on the grounds that those who preached it were preaching the deification of men.

The Nazi leaders charged that both Catholic and Protestant clergy were breaking the laws and defying the authority of the state.  The Roman Catholic and Protestant bishops replied by stating the extreme Nazi doctrines were antagonistic and contrary to the Divine Plan of Creation.  The Nazi leaders countered with the argument that the Church had no right to interfere in matters of state.
 
Hitler tried to pacify the clergy by banning the Grand Orient Lodges which were known to be the headquarters of the Aryan extremists throughout Germany.  The Nazi leaders rendered this step abortive changing them over to "Orders of German Chivalry." Hitler, in order to maintain a united front against Communism, tried to pacify the Nazis by issuing an edict that any clergyman preaching against the laws of the state, or questioning its supremacy, would be subjected to the full process of the law and, if found guilty, would suffer the penalties provided for such 'crimes'.  This situation provides another example of how the forces of evil divided two powerful forces which were both combating a common enemy.

The anti-Fascist propaganda made the most of the disagreement between Hitler and the Pope.  It is true Pope Pius XI denounced Naziism in no uncertain terms in the Encyclical of March 14th, 1937 "on the condition of the Church in Germany."  He told Roman Catholics that he had weighed every word of the encyclical in the scales of truth and clarity.  In reference to the Nazi conception of the superiority of the Aryan race and the supremacy of the state he said :

"While it is true that the race or the people;  the state or a form of government;  the representatives of a civil power, or other fundamental elements of human society have an essential and honourable place in the natural order, nevertheless, if anyone detaches them from this scale of earthly values and exalts them as the supreme form and standard of all things, even of religious values, deifying them with idolatrous worship, he perverts and falsifies the order of things created and constituted by God, and is far from true faith in God, and from a conception of life in conformity therewith...Our God is a personal God, transcendent, Almighty, Infinite, Perfect.  One in the Trinity of Persons and three in the unity of the Divine Essence;  creator of the universe;  Lord; King; and ultimate purpose of the history of the world;  who does not suffer and can never suffer any other divinity besides Him ...  Only superficial minds can fall into the error of speaking of a National God, of a National Religion, of foolishly attempting to restrict within the narrow confines of a single race that God, who is the Creator of the world, the King and Law-Giver of all peoples, before Whose greatness the nations are as small as drops of water in a bucket" (Isaias XL-15).

In a pastoral letter dated August 19th, 1938, the bishops of Germany struck out boldly against Nazi ideology.  The letter says that the attitude of the Nazi towards the Christian religion in Germany is in open contradiction with the Fuehrer's assertions...[10]  "What is aimed at is not merely the checking of the growth of the Catholic Church but the wiping out of Christianity and the setting up in its place of a religion which is utterly alien to the Christian belief in One True God."  The letter goes on to point out that the Nazi attack on Dr. Sproll, the Protestant bishop of Rottenburg, clearly proved that the 'persecution' is directed not only against the Catholic
Church but against the whole Christian idea as such...  "An attempt is being made to get rid of the Christian God in order to replace Him with a "German God".  What does a German God mean ?  Is He different from the God of other peoples ?  If so, then there must be a special God for each nation and for each people...  This is the same as saying "There is no God."[11]

What happened in Germany in 1936 has happened in other countries since.  The leaders of 'Black' Naziism joined forces with the leaders of 'Red' Communism in an attack on both the Christian religion and the British Empire.  The totalitarian-minded Nazi War Lords initiated their followers into the German Grand Orient Lodges, using the ancient pagan rites and ritual handed down from the time the barbaric Aryan tribes and the Huns swept over Europe.  The totalitarian-minded men who direct international Communism initiate their leaders into the Grand Orient Lodges of other countries using the ancient Cabalistic Rites of Illuminism.  To understand this situation, it is necessary to recall that Jews have never, under any circumstances, been admitted into the German Grand Orient Lodges since 1785 when the papers found on the body of the Courier of the Illuminati, who was killed by lightning at Ratisbon, were handed over by the police to the Bavarian authorities, and proved that the Grand Orient Lodges in France were being used as the secret headquarters of the Jewish inspired revolutionary movement.

When complicated situations such as these develop, it can be understood why the Roman Catholic Church has taken such a definite stand against 'Black' Naziism, while tolerating the less extreme forms of Fascism, i.e. anti-Communism as practiced by Franco in Spain.  It also explains why Cardinal Mindszenty collaborated with allegedly Fascist leaders who attempted to overthrow Communist domination in his country.

Franco has consistently refused to go off the deep end.  He refused to support German Naziism in World War Two simply because the extreme Nazi Pagan War Lords had become all powerful in Germany.  In Germany, Italy, France, Spain, and Japan, millions of citizens, peaceful by inclination and charitable at heart, found themselves in the position of having to decide whether they became actively Pro-Fascist or Pro-Communist.  They were given Hobson's Choice.  They usually picked what they considered the lesser of two evils.  They were immediately labeled accordingly.

[Panoptimist]

A close reading and careful study of N.H. Webster's "World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilization" will reveal all one needs to know about this issue.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Interesting post there Fester.

Hitler also had to think of the "Church" as a possible force that could break up Germany.  Bismarck introduced his KulturKampf to reduce the strength of the Catholic church in German unification.  Hitler knew that Germany could be taken apart by "religion" as a threat as soon as the Weimer Democracy failed.

[Fester]

Panop, I'll go looking for that one.  Appreciate the reference.  Carr is very big on the issue of "Nazi War Lords" or "Black Nazis."  Hadn't been aware of the distinction and would welcome suggestions to clarify/prove the point.  Thanks in advance to one and all.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Don't forget this classic:

----------

THE NAMELESS WAR -- III
by Captain A.H.M. Ramsay

GERMANY BELLS THE CAT

The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter to Mr. Balfour, denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan, which if not checked by the combined action of the European Powers, would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities of Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organised and maintained for some time a merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia. In Germany, the Jews Leibknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg, etc., made a desperate bid for power. These and other similar convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own way just frustrated the onslaughts.

In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in an endeavour to expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one, however, did a political leader and group arise, who grasped to the full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National Socialist Party of Germany.

Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organised revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact. We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which they cannot shirk.

To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentations of a Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer idleness, if for no worse reason. To act on such unverified a basis is to sin against the Light. In the case of Germany and Hitler the task of research is not difficult. We have it on many authorities that Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, stated fully and accurately the author's observations and conclusions concerning all these vital matters. Quite false pictures have been propagated deliberately about this book, by quoting passages out of their context, distorting meanings, and downright misrepresentation. Having read many of these unscrupulous diatribes, it was with no little surprise that I read this book for myself not so very long ago.

From many conversations I had heard and taken part in, I now realise that most members of the public were as ignorant as I of the real nature of this remarkable book. I propose, therefore, to try and give a true picture of its spirit and purport by quotations from its two main themes: Firstly realisation and exposure of the Jewish scheme for world Marxism; and secondly, admiration of, and longing for friendship with Great Britain.

Writing of the days before 1914, Hitler states: "I still saw Jewry as a religion ... Of the existence of deliberate Jewish hostility I had no conception ... I gradually realised that the Social Democratic Press was preponderantly controlled by Jews ... There was not a single paper with which Jews were connected which could be described as genuinely national ... I seized all the Social Democratic pamphlets I could get hold of, and looked up the names of their authors -- nothing but Jews."

As he pursued the study of these questions, Hitler began to perceive the main outlines of the truth:- "I made also a deep study of the relation between Judaism and Marxism ... The Jewish State never had boundaries as far as space was concerned; it was unlimited as regards space, but bound down by its conception of itself as a race. That people, therefore, was always a State within a State ... The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle in nature... denies the value of the individual among men, combats the importance of nationality and race, thereby depriving humanity of the whole meaning of existence."

"Democracy in the west today is the forerunner of Marxism, which would be inconceivable without Democracy." "If the Jew, with the help of his Marxian creed, conquers the nations of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of the human race ..." "Thus did I now believe," he writes of the days of 1918, "that by defending myself against the Jews I am doing the Lord's work."

At the end of 1918 there came the revolution in Germany organised behind the unbroken army in the field. Concerning this Hitler wrote:- "In November sailors arrived in lorries, and called on us all to revolt, a few Jewish youths being the leaders in that struggle for the 'freedom, beauty and dignity of our national life'. Not one of them had ever been to the Front."

"The real organiser of the revolution and its actual wire-puller the International Jew ... The revolution was not made by the forces of peace and order; but by those of riot, robbery and plunder."

"I was beginning to learn afresh, and only now (1919) came to a right comprehension of the teachings and intentions of the Jew Karl Marx. Only now did I properly understand his 'Kapital'; and equally also the struggle of Social Democracy against the economics of the nation; and that its aim is to prepare the ground for the domination of the truly international Kapital." Emperor to offer the hand of friendship to the leaders of Marxism ... While they held the Imperial hand in theirs the other hand was already feeling for the dagger." "With the Jew there is no bargaining; there is merely the hard 'either, or'."

Later on Hitler gives in great detail the outlines of the Jewish disruptive machine. "By means of the Trades Unions which might have been the saving of the nation, the Jew actually destroys the nation's economics."

"By creating a press which is on the intellectual level of the least educated, the political and labour organisation obtains force of compulsion enabling it to make the lowest strata of the nation ready for the most hazardous enterprises."

"The Jewish press ... tears down all which may be regarded as the prop of a nation's independence, civilisation and its economic autonomy. It roars especially against characters who refuse to bow the knee to Jewish domination, or whose intellectual capacity appears to the Jew in the light of a menace to himself."

"The ignorance displayed by the mass ... and the lack of instinctive perception of our upper class make the people easy dupes of this campaign of Jewish lies."

"But the present day is working its own ruin; it introduces universal suffrage, chatters about equal rights, and can give no reason for so thinking. In its eyes material rewards are the expression of a man's worth, thus shattering the basis for the noblest equality that could possibly exist."

"It is one of the tasks of our Movement to hold out prospects of a time when the individual will be given what he needs in order to live; but also to maintain the principle that man does not live for material enjoyment alone."

"The political life of today alone has persistently turned its back on this principle of nature" (i.e. quality) ... "

"Human civilisation is but the outcome of the creative force of personality in the community as a whole, and especially among its leaders ... the principle of the dignity of the majority is beginning to poison all life below it; and in fact to break it up."

"We now see that Marxism is the enunciated form of the Jewish attempt to abolish the importance of personality in all departments of human life; and to set up the mass of numbers in its place ... "

"The principle of decision by majorities has not always governed the human race; on the contrary, it only appears during quite short periods of his tory, and those are always periods of decadence in nations and States."

"We must not forget that the international Jew, who continues to dominate over Russia, does not regard Germany as an ally, but as a State destined to undergo a similar fate."

On the last page and in almost the last paragraph of Mein Kampf is the following:- "The party as such stands for positive Christianity, but does not bind itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession. It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within us and without us." Looking round the world for help in the battle against this terrible menace of Jew directed bolshevism, Hitler's mind constantly reverted to Britain and the British Empire. He always longed for their friendship. Always declared Britain to be one of the greatest bulwarks against chaos; and that her interests and those of Germany were complementary and not contrary to one another.

"It was not a British interest," he wrote, "but in the first place a Jewish one to destroy Germany." And again:- "Even in England there is a continual struggle going on between the representatives of British state interests and the Jewish world dictatorship."

"Whilst England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the Jew is organising his measures for its conquest ... Thus the Jew today is a rebel in England, and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be started there also."

"No sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England's alliance. It would have meant renunciation of the colonies and importance at sea, and refraining from interference with British industry by competition."

In later years these two themes were ceaselessly expounded; viz., the Jewish Marxist menace, and the eagerness for friendship with Britain. Even down to, and including Dunkirk, Hitler pressed the latter idea on all and sundry; even on his highest Generals, to their astonishment. Nor did he stop at words, as will be shown later when, as Liddell Hart informs us, he saved the British Army from annihilation by halting the Panzer Corps, informing his Generals the while, that he regarded the British Empire and the Catholic Church as necessary bulwarks of peace and order which must be safeguarded.*

Mein Kampf was first published in October 1933. Before it had left the printers, the floodgates of Jewish hatred and lies had been full-opened against Hitler and the Third Reich all over the world. English-speaking people everywhere were deluged with fabrications, distortions and atrocity stories, which drowned the voices of the few who understood the real situation.

Forgotten in the turmoil was Marx's slogan that before bolshevism could triumph the British Empire must be destroyed; and totally suppressed as far as the British people were concerned was Hitler's repeated declaration of his willingness to defend the British Empire if called upon to assist by force of arms if necessary.

*"The Other Side of the Hill," Chap. X, by Liddell Hart.
1933: JEWRY DECLARES WAR

The English edition of Mein Kampf was still in the process of printing and publication when Jewry declared war on the national Socialist regime, and started an intensive blockade against Germany.

The International Jewish Boycott Conference was assembled in Holland in the summer of 1933 under the Presidency of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, of the U.S.A., who was elected President of the World Jewish Economic Federation formed to combat the opposition to Jews in Germany. On his return to the U.S.A., Mr. Untermeyer gave an address over Station W.A.B.C., the text of which, as printed in the New York Times of August 7th, 1933, I have before me. Mr Untermeyer referred in the opening phrases to: "The holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked"; and proceeded to develop the subject at great length, describing the Jews as the aristocrats of the world. "Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here." Those Jews who did not join in he denounced, declaring: "They are traitors to their race."

In January 1934 Mr. Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism, wrote in Natcha Retch: "The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish community, conference, trade organisation, by every Jew in the world ... we shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against Germany."

This is perhaps the most confident assertion extant on the Jewish claim, set out in the Protocols of Zion, that they can bring about war.

Protocol Number 7 states: "We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by a State by war with its neighbour. If these should venture to stand collectively, by universal war." It should be remembered here that a copy of these Protocols was filed in the British Museum in 1906.

By 1938 the Jewish war was in full swing; and already through their influence or pressure many Gentile persons and groups were being drawn into the vortex. Various members of the British Socialist Party were openly advocating joining in this cold war; and a vigorous and uncompromising clique was growing in all Parties under the leadership of Messrs. Churchill, Amery, Duff, Cooper and others. "Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced to it, not this year, but later on,' screamed the Jew Emil Ludwig in the June copy of Les Aniles 1934.

On June 3rd, 1938, matters were carried a long step further by an article in the American Hebrew, the weekly organ of American Jewry. This article, which opened by showing that Hitler never deviated from his Mein Kampf doctrine, went on to threaten the direst retaliation. "It has become patent that a combination of Britain, France and Russia will sooner or later bar the triumphant march (of Hitler) ... Either by accident or design, a Jew has come to a position of foremost importance in each of these nations. In the hands of non-Aryans lies the fate and the very lives of millions ... In France the Jew of prominence is Leon Blum ... Leon Blum may yet be the Moses who will lead ... Maxim Litvinoff, Soviet super salesman, is the Jew who sits at the right hand of Stalin, the little tin soldier of communism ... The English Jew of prominence is Leslie Hore-Belisha, Tommy Atkins' new boss."

Later in this article we read: "So it may come to pass that these three sons of Israel will form the combine that will send the frenzied Nazi dictator to hell. And when the smoke of battle clears ... and the man who played the swastikaed Christus ... is lowered into a hole in the ground ... as the trio of non-Aryans intone a ramified requiem ... a medley of the marseillaise, God Save the King, and the Internationale, blending with a proud and aggressive rendering of Eili Eili."

Two points in the above extract are worthy of special note. Firstly, it is taken for granted that these three Jews will not for one moment think or act as anything but Jews; and can be relied upon to guide their Gentile dupes to ruin in a plainly Jewish war; secondly, should be noted the contemptuous reference to the "swastikaed Christus," which Jewry looks forward to burying; and which reveals by its classification the Jewish hatred of Christianity.

Meantime Jewish pressure was exerted to the utmost to incite clashes between Sudeten, Czechs, Poles and Germans. By September of 1938 matters had reached a desperate pass. Mr. Chamberlain himself flew out to Munich and achieved the historic settlement with Hitler. It seemed as though the war mongers had been frustrated, and Europe saved. Rarely had such scenes and evidences of spontaneous delight and thankfulness been evoked as were witnessed throughout Britain and Europe at that triumph.

Those who knew the power of the enemy, however, knew that Mr Chamberlain's work was certain to be swiftly sabotaged. I remember remarking, on the very evening of his return from Munich, that within a week every newspaper in this country and the war mongers in Parliament, would be attacking Mr. Chamberlain for having secured peace; regardless of the fact that in so doing they were contemptuously flouting the real wishes of the people. This remark was only too true, as events proved.

Nowhere was the Jewish fury so obvious, of course, as in Moscow. I have before me a leaflet of my own designing put out in October 1938. It runs:-

"Are you aware that Mr. Chamberlain was burnt in effigy in Moscow as soon as it was known that he had secured peace; Showing very clearly Who Wanted War, and who are still ceaselessly working to stir up strife all the world over."* The attempt to provoke war over Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia having failed, there remained only the detonator in the Polish Corridor, that monstrosity born of the unholy Versailles Conference, and denounced by honest men from Marshal Foch and Arthur Henderson, from that time onwards.

One feature about the Versailles Conference has been kept secret by those who possess the power to keep things from the public or to proclaim things from the house tops. It is this: All important decisions were taken by the "Big Four" - Britain, France, Italy and the U.S.A., represented respectively by Mr. Lloyd George, M. Clemencau, Baron Sonino and President Wilson. So much is known. What is not known is that the secretary of Mr. Lloyd George was the Jew Sassoon; of M. Clemencau the Jew Mandel Rothschild, now known as Mandel; Baron Sonino was himself half a Jew: and President Wilson had the Jew Brandeis; the interpreter was another Jew named Mantoux; and the Military Adviser yet another Jew called Kish.

It is known that Mr. Lloyd George and others were hazy about geography. Their Jewish secretaries, however, were on the contrary very much on the spot on such matters. These Jews met at 6 p.m. in the evenings; and mapped out the decisions for the following day's conference of the "Big Four."

The results were disastrous from the point of view of all decent people, who hoped for an honourable treaty, with terms which, though they might be stringent, would at least be just and thereby secure lasting peace. *See Appendix 4.

Foch himself loudly denounced the treaty; declaring that it contained the certain makings of another war and deprecating in particular the provision relating to Danzig and the Corridor. Arthur Henderson and many public men joined in the denunciation; but all to no avail.

From the point of view of men planning another war, however, nothing could have been better than this treaty. All sorts of glaring injustices were ingrained in its text. In addition to the Corridor, and the position at Danzig, a bastard State was brought into being, in which Germans, Slovaks, etc., together forming a majority of the country, were put under the tyrannical control of the Czech minority, an element which had thrown in its lot with the bolshevik Jews and fought against the Allies in 1918.

The design of this State was such geographically that it was styled, and correctly styled, a dagger pointed at the heart of Germany. It received the outlandish name of Czechoslovakia. The whole of the industrial life from the huge Skoda arsenal downwards was controlled by Jewish banking interests; while we have it on the evidence of Lord Winterton that practically all the land was mortgaged to the Jews (Hansard, October 1936). Under this Messianic domination were enslaved huge sections of populations, belonging to other nations, henceforward condemned to be held down by force until some country should grow strong enough to champion them.

This eventuality was, in my opinion, visualised and actually fostered as we know by the huge loans to Germany from international banking interests. * Let it not be forgotten that while Jewish bankers were pouring money into Germany which was rebuilding the Wehrmacht on a bigger scale than ever, a colossal campaign for peace and disarmament was launched in this country. This not only succeeded in substantially disarming us; but in creating an atmosphere in which Mr. Baldwin had to admit that he dared not go to the country asking for more armaments, vital though he knew our needs in sea, air and land forces to be.

*All prior of course to the rise of Hitler.

To anyone who made a study of the personalities and powers behind this so-called peace propaganda, as I did, there can be no doubt as to whence the real drive and finance emanated. To anyone appreciating the attitude of the press at that time, and realising that had this disarmament propaganda been distasteful to those who influence our publicity services, there would have blared forth a torrent of invective against our "peace ballotters"; there is additional proof that this campaign had the support of international Jewry, as had the rearmament of Germany. But why? the simple will ask.

The answer is fairly simple, if once the purpose behind the Jewish plan is understood. "Out of the last war we brought the Soviet States of Russia; out of the next war we will bring the Soviet States of Europe," had been the pronouncement at a world meeting of communist parties about 1932.

To make the next war possible, therefore, the see-saw must be balanced again; German strength built up, and British strength whittled down. Then the Europeans can fight each other to the death of one and complete exhaustion of the other. A dramatic surprise is in store for both sides.

Neither is to be the real winner. The real winner is quite a different army. This army is the one that will receive the real attention. For 25 years it will be built up under conditions of the greatest secrecy. Its leaders will not show their strength until the conflict is well under way. Not until a critical moment in the war will the European armies be permitted to guess at the existence of the huge factories beyond the Urals, or of the colossal proportions of the heavily mechanised hordes which will then commence to roll westwards over Europe under the red flag of Marxism.

In March 1939 a British guarantee to Poland was given by Mr Chamberlain on the strength of a false report to the effect that a 48-hour ultimatum had been delivered by Germany to the Poles. This report subsequently turned out to be quite untrue. The guarantee had been given, however, and the decision of peace or war was now no longer in British hands. Jewry had the ball at its feet. Can we doubt but that Poland was encouraged to ignore the German note of March which set forth eminently reasonable suggestions for a peaceful solution of the problem of the Corridor?

Month after month no reply was vouchsafed by Poland to the German note. Meanwhile, insult and outrage occurred with suspicious frequency all along the German frontier, similar to the technique to which the Jews later introduced the British in Palestine. Day after day the British public was deluged with war propaganda and misrepresentation of the situation. Finally their minds were closed against any further regard to the demands of justice or reason by a new slogan, "You cannot trust Hitler's word." With this lie the British public was finally stampeded into throwing all reason and judgement to the winds and accepting at their face value the war propaganda in the press.

This slogan was founded upon a misrepresentation of Hitler's assurance given on more than one occasion after a "putsch" such as that into Sudetenland, that he "intended to make no further demands." The misrepresentation lay in the fact that the press steadily obscured the major fact, that the "demands" to which Hitler referred were all along five fold in character; and covered those five areas taken from Germany by a dictated peace in which the population was overwhelmingly German, i.e. Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Corridor and Danzig.

As German troops occupied each successive section, it is, I believe, accurate to say that Hitler declared, that he had no additional demands to make. But here it must be clearly stated in the interests of justice that he never said that this entailed reducing the demands which he had originally very clearly delineated, and repeated on many occasions, namely, the five areas in question.

The British public was deluded by its press into supposing that when Hitler said he had no further demands, that there had never been any statement of his full demands, some of which were still unfulfilled. They were led to believe that Hitler either never had any other demands, or that he had abandoned the rest as soon as he had obtained some of them. When, therefore, the next instalment was added, the press built on this misunderstanding the fallacy that Hitler's word could not be trusted.

Honest dealing needs no such trickery and deception. Such methods are only necessary to bolster up bad or unjust causes. Fortunately we have the calm and dispassionate judgement in this matter by no less a person than the late Lord Lothian, recently British Ambassador to the U.S.A. In his last speech at Chatham House on this subject he remarked: "If the principle of self-determination had been applied in Germany's favour, as it was applied against her, it would have meant the return of Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, parts of Poland, the Polish Corridor, and Danzig to the Reich."

Here is a very different presentment of the case to the one which was foisted upon the British public in 1939; and it is the true one. Small wonder that these facts had to be withheld from the ordinary citizen.

Had the British public realised the truth, that each of these demands of Hitler's rested on a foundation of reasonable fairness, the people of this island would have ruled out any question of war; and it was war, not truth or justice, upon which international Jewry was resolved.
"PHONEY WAR" ENDED BY CIVILIAN BOMBING

Though a state of war was declared to exist between Britain and Germany in September of 1939, it very soon became apparent that no war was being conducted by Germany against this country. This was no surprise to those who knew the facts of the case. Hitler had again and again made it clear, that he never intended to attack or harm Great Britain or the British Empire. With the Siegfried Line strongly held, and no German intention of appearing west of it, stalemate in the west, or the "Phoney War," as it came to be called, must, in the absence of bombing of civilian populations ultimately peter out altogether. No one was quicker to perceive this than the pro-Jewish war mongers; and they and their friends inside and outside the House of Commons very soon began exerting pressure for this form of bombing of Germany to be started.

On 14th January, 1940, The Sunday Times gave prominence to a letter from an anonymous correspondent, who demanded to know why we were not using our air power "to increase the effect of the blockade." "Scrutator," in the same issue, commented on this letter as follows:- "Such an extension of the offensive would inevitably develop into competitive frightfulness. It might be forced on us in reprisals for enemy action, and we must be in a position to make reprisals if necessary. But the bombing of industrial towns, with its unavoidable loss of life among the civilian population -- that is what it would come to -- would be inconsistent with the spirit, if not the actual words of the pledges given from both sides at the beginning of the war."

The above quotation is taken from a book entitled Bombing Vindicated, which was published in 1944 by Mr. J. M. Spaight, C.B., C.B.E., who was the principal assistant secretary at the Air Ministry during the war. As its title suggests, this book is an attempt to justify the indiscriminate use of bombers against the civil population. In it Mr. Spaight boasts that this form of bombing "saved civilisation": and reveals the startling fact that it was Britain that started this ruthless form of war on the very evening of the day on which Mr. Churchill became Prime Minister, May 11th, 1940.

On page 64 of his book, Mr. Spaight gives a further piece of information, which renders this sudden change of British policy all the more astonishing; for he states that a declaration was made by the British and French Governments on 2nd September, 1939, that "Only strictly military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word would be bombarded."

This declaration, of course, was made in the days of Mr Chamberlain's Premiership; and no single fact perhaps could demarcate and differentiate more clearly the difference in the character and behaviour between Mr. Chamberlain and Mr. Churchill.

On the 27th January, 1940, thirteen days after the letter in The Sunday Times already quoted, The Daily Mail endorsed editorially the views which had been expressed in that issue by "Scrutator"; and it devoted a leading article, writes Mr. Spaight, to combating the suggestion of Mr. Amery and others that we should start the bombing of Germany. Sir Duff Cooper had written on the previous day in the same paper that "there would appear to exist a kind of unwritten truce between the two belligerents, according to the tacit terms of which they do not bomb one another."

In view of the declaration by Britain and France of September 2nd, 1939, that they would "only bomb military objectives in the narrowest sense of the word," Sir Duff Cooper's verbiage about "a kind of unwritten truce," seems to me gravely obscurantist, if honest.

Inside the House of Commons, the pro-Jewish war mongers were now becoming more and more intransigent; and more and more set on sabotaging the chances of turning the "phoney war" into a negotiated peace. This in spite of the fact that Britain had nothing to gain by further and total war, and everything to lose. The Jews, of course, had everything to lose by a peace which left the German gold-free money system and Jew-free Government intact, and nothing to gain.

It seemed clearer to me every day that this struggle over the question of civilian bombing was the crux of the whole matter; and that by this method of warfare alone could the Jews and their allies cut the Gordian knot of stalemate leading to peace; and probably later on to a joint attack on Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.

Accordingly, on 15th February, 1940, I put down the following question to the Prime Minister:-

Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:- "Whether he will assure the House that H.M. Government will not assent to the suggestions made to them, to abandon those principles which led them to denounce the bombing of civilian populations in Spain and elsewhere, and embark upon such a policy themselves?"

Mr Chamberlain himself replied in outspoken terms:-

"I am unaware of the suggestions to which my honourable and gallant friend refers. The policy of H.M. Government in this matter was fully stated by myself in answer to a question by the honourable Member for Bishop Auckland (Mr Dalton) on 14th September last. In the course of that answer I said that whatever be the length to which others may go, H.M. Government will never resort to the deliberate attack on women and children, and other civilians, for purposes of mere terrorism. I have nothing to add to that answer."

Both this question and the reply were evidently distasteful in the extreme to the war mongers, so I resolved to carry the matter a stage further.

On 21st February I put down another question on the subject:-

Captain Ramsay asked the Prime Minister:- "Whether he is aware that the Soviet aeroplanes are carrying on a campaign of bombing civil populations, and whether H.M. Government have despatched protests on the subject similar to those despatched during the Civil War in Spain in similar circumstances?"

Mr. Butler replied for the Prime Minister:- "Yes, Sir. The Soviet Air Forces have pursued a policy of indiscriminate bombing, which cannot be too strongly condemned. H.M. Government have not, however, lodged any protest, since there are unfortunately no grounds for supposing that such action would achieve the result desired."

There can be little doubt but that these two downright answers crystallised the resolves of the war mongers to get rid of a Prime Minister whose adherence to an upright and humane policy must inevitably frustrate their plans, seeing that Hitler wished no war with Britain, and would therefore never start civilian bombing himself.

The machinery of intrigue and rebellion against Mr. Chamberlain was set in motion. Ultimately he was saddled with the blame for the Norway blunder; and this pretext was used by the Churchillian-cum-Socialist caucus to secure his downfall.

It should be remembered in this connection that prior to and during the Norway gamble, Mr. Churchill had been invested with full powers and responsibilities for all Naval Military and Air operations; and if anyone therefore deserved to be broken over that second Gallipoli (pursued in defiance of high naval authority warning that, without control of the Cattegat and Skaggerack it could not possibly succeed) it should have been the Minister responsible.

He however was not only unbroken, he was acclaimed Prime Minister. The man who would tear up the British pledge of September 2nd, 1939, and start bombing the civilians of Germany was the man for the war mongers who now ruled the roost.

And so civilian bombing started on the evening that the architect of the Norwegian fiasco became Prime Minister, viz., May 11th, 1940.
DUNKIRK AND AFTER

Captain Liddell Hart, the eminent military critic, wrote a book on the military events of 1939-45, which was published in 1948, and entitled The Other Side of the Hill. Chapter 10 -- which deals with the German invasion of France down to and including Dunkirk -- bears the somewhat startling title, "How Hitler beat France and saved Britain." The reading of the chapter itself will astound all propaganda-blinded people, even more than the title: for the author therein proves that not only did Hitler save this country; but that this was not the result of some unforeseen factor, or indecision, or folly, but was of set purpose, based on his long enunciated and faithfully maintained principle.

Having given details of how Hitler peremptorily halted the Panzer Corps on the 22nd May, and kept them inactive for the vital few days, till, in fact, the British troops had got away from Dunkirk, Captain Liddell Hart quotes Hitler's telegram to Von Kleist:-

"The armoured divisions are to remain at medium artillery range from Dunkirk. Permission is only granted for reconnaissance and protective movements."

Von Kleist decided to ignore the order, the author tells us. To quote him again:-

"Then came a more emphatic order, that I was to withdraw behind the canal. My tanks were kept halted there for three days."

In the following words the author reports a conversation which took place on May 24th (i.e. two days later) between Herr Hitler and Marshal Von Runstedt, and two key men of his staff:-

"He then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world ... He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church -- saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the continent. The return of Germany's lost colonies would be desirable, but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops, if she should be involved in any difficulties anywhere. He concluded by saying that his aim was to make peace with Britain, on a basis that she would regard compatible with her honour to accept."

Captain Liddell Hart comments on the above as follows:-

"If the British Army had been captured at Dunkirk, the British people might have felt that their honour had suffered a stain, which they must wipe out. By letting it escape, Hitler hoped to conciliate them."

"This conviction of Hitler's deeper motive," he continues, "was confirmed by his strangely dilatory attitude over the subsequent plans for the invasion of England."

"He showed little interest in the plans," Blumentritt said, "and made no effort to speed up the preparation. That was utterly different to his usual behaviour. Before the invasion of Poland, of France, and later of Russia, he repeatedly spurred them on; but on this occasion he sat back."

The author continues:-

"Since the account of his conversation at Charleville, and subsequent holding back, comes from a section of the Generals, who had long distrusted Hitler's policy, that makes their testimony all the more notable."

And later he goes on to say:-

"Significantly their account of Hitler's thoughts about England at the decisive hour before Dunkirk, fits in with much that he himself wrote earlier in Mein Kampf; and it is remarkable how closely he followed his own Bible in other respects.

Anyone who has read Mein Kampf will immediately appreciate the accuracy of the above statement. It is indeed if anything an understatement. Throughout that remarkable book runs two main themes, as I have shown in an earlier chapter -- the one, a detailed delineation and denunciation of the Jewish Capitalist-Revolutionary machine; the other, admiration for and eagerness for friendship with Britain and the Empire.

It is a pity, indeed, that so few persons in this island have read this book for themselves; and it is a tragedy that they have instead swallowed wholesale, the unscrupulous distortions and untrue propaganda on the subject, served up to them by Jewish publicity machinery, operating through our press and radio. Let these people but try and obtain a copy of that book; and when they find they cannot, let them reflect, that if indeed its contents confirmed the lies that they have been told concerning it and its author, the powers behind our publicity would ensure that everyone should be able to secure a copy at the cheapest possible rate.

In any event, I would urge my countrymen to ponder most earnestly the following facts.

The Jew Karl Marx laid it down, that Bolshevism could never really succeed till the British Empire had been utterly destroyed.

Hitler laid it down, that the British Empire was an essential element of stability in the world; and even declared himself ready to defend it with troops, if it should be involved in difficulties anywhere.

By unscrupulous propaganda on an unprecedented scale this country was led into destroying those who wished to be her friends, and offered their lives to defend her; and exalting those, who proclaimed that her destruction was a necessary preliminary to the success of their ideology, forfeiting her Empire and her economic independence in the process.
THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME

If the new-found knowledge of Hitler's anxiety to preserve the British Empire has come as a surprise recently to many people in this country, it must surely have come as a real shock to them to learn that President Roosevelt, on the other hand, was its inveterate enemy; that he was not only a pro-communist of Jewish origin, but that before he brought America into the war he made it clear that he wished to break up the British Empire.

His son, Colonel Elliot Roosevelt, makes this last point very clear in his book, As He Saw It, recently published in the U.S.A.

On pages 19 to 28 of this book, Colonel Roosevelt tells us that in August 1941, his Father, having given out to the American people that he was going off on a fishing trip, actually proceeded to a meeting with Mr. Churchill on board a warship in Argentia Bay. Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Edward Cadogan, and Lord Cherwell (Professor Lindeman of doubtful race and nationality), and Mr. Averil Harriman were present, he says. On page 35 he quotes his Father as saying, "After the war . . . there will have to be the greatest possible freedom of trade . . . no artificial barriers." Mr. Churchill referred to he British Empire Trade Agreements, and Mr. Roosevelt replied, "Yes. Those Empire Trade Agreements are a case in point. It's because of them that the peoples of India, Africa, and of all the Colonial Near East are still as backward as they are . . . I can't believe that we can fight a war against Fascist slavery, and at the same time not work to free people all over the world from a backward colonial policy." "The peace," said Father firmly, "cannot include any continued despotism."

This insolent talk against the British Empire became so pronounced that on page 31 Colonel Roosevelt reports Mr.Churchill as saying, "Mr.President, I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire." This comment was very near the mark, as the President had been talking about India, Burma, Egypt, Palestine, Indo-China, Indonesia, and all the African Colonies having to be "freed."

On page 115, the Colonel reports his Father as saying, "Don't think for a moment, Elliot, that Americans would be dying in the Pacific tonight if it hadn't been for the short-sighted greed of the French, the British and the Dutch. Shall we allow them to do it all over again?"

These were not at all the reasons, however, given for the war, and for which Americans thought they were dying; nor indeed does the President make any reference as to the pretexts given to his countrymen for the war.

The British, dying in greater numbers, have on the contrary been told that they are dying to defend their Empire from Hitler's wicked plans. Little do they suspect, that it is their so-called ally who plans its destruction.

"When we've won the war," the President is reported as saying on page 116, "I will see that the U.S.A. is not wheedled into any plans that will aid or abet the British Empire in its Imperialist ambitions."

And a few pages later:

"I have tried to make it clear to Winston and the others . . . that they must never get the idea that we are in it just to help them hang on to the archaic and medieval Empire ideas."

Those who sup with the devil need a long spoon. Mr. Churchill, the self-styled "constant architect of the Jews' future," now found himself playing second fiddle to an even more trusted architect; so eminent, in fact, that he did not make any silly pretensions of respect for the British Empire. The earlier Moses, Karl Marx, had denounced the Empire long ago, and in the year 1941, it was only foolish opponents of Judaism and Marxism, like Herr Hitler, who were anxious to stand by that Empire, because they recognised it as a bulwark of Christian civilisation.

Although, as we have seen, Mr. Churchill is shown in this book as getting a little petulant from time to time over the President's pronouncements regarding the liquidation of the Empire, this did not prevent him from announcing himself later to the House of Commons as "Roosevelt's ardent lieutenant." Under what special circumstances the King's Prime Minister could be an ardent lieutenant of a Republican President, whose design it was to destroy that Monarch's Empire, Mr. Churchill did not explain; nor has he yet done so. On another occasion, Mr. Churchill made an equally cryptic remark: "It is no part of my duties," he assured the House of Commons, "to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire."

No, indeed! Nor was it any part of his duties, on being told that it was to be liquidated, to pronounce himself to be the ardent lieutenant of the would-be liquidator. Nor, we might add, when Minister of Defence, with Admiralty and other codes at his disposal, was it any part of his duties, as Mr. Chamberlain's lieutenant, albeit not very ardent, to conduct a personal correspondence of the nature which he did conduct with President Roosevelt by means of the top secret code of the American Foreign Office.
PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT'S ROLE

In my Statement to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons concerning my detention (see Appendix 1) I summed up at the end of Part 1, the considerations which led me to inspect the secret U.S. Embassy papers at Mr. Tyler Kent's flat in the last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's Premiership.

The first two of these six considerations were as follows:-

Together with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was fully aware that among the agencies both here and abroad, which had been actively engaged in promoting bad feeling between Great Britain and Germany, organised Jewry, for obvious reasons, had played a leading part.

I knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore the real, though not apparent, centre of their activities.

It was not until 1948 that corroborative evidence of the foregoing from unimpeachable American sources came into my hands; but when it did come, however, the authentic and fully documented character of the work left nothing to be desired. I refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War 1941, which was published by the Yale University Press in April 1948.

This book, which comes with all the authority of its eminent author, is nothing less than a tremendous indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues.

Firstly, that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated promises, to the effect that he would keep the U.S.A. out of any European war; secondly, that he incessantly and flagrantly disregarded not only his promises to the American people, but all the laws of neutrality; thirdly, that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted this cold war, which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the Japanese an ultimatum, which no one could imagine could result in anything but immediate war.

From many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one:- "At Boston on October 30th, 1940, he (F.D.R.) was even more emphatic, for there he declared:

'I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars';

and on December 29th:

'You can therefore nail any talk about sending armies to Europe as deliberate untruth'."

Professor Beard goes on to prove that while Mr. Roosevelt was making these speeches, he was treating international laws of neutrality with total disregard, and in the interests only of those who were fighting the Jews' battles. The two main forms of non-shooting intervention were the convoying of U.S. ships of ammunition and supplies for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act.

Whatever be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S. arsenals and navy under these two cold war decisions of Mr Roosevelt, no one can pretend that they were either in accordance with his pledges to the American people, or the fundamentals of international law regarding neutrality.

Some very plain speaking went on in Congress over these acts of the President's.

Representative U. Burdick, of North Dakota, said: "All our aid to Britain may mean anything . . . To sell her supplies is one thing . . . to sell her supplies and convoy them is another thing, to have actual war is the last thing -- the last thing is inevitable from the first thing!"

Representative Hugh Paterson, of Georgia, said: "It is a measure of aggressive war."

Representative Dewey Short, of Missouri, said:

"You cannot be half-way in war, and half-way out of war . . . You can dress this measure up all you please (Lend, Lease), you can sprinkle it with perfume and pour powder on it . . . but it is still foul and stinks to high heaven."

Representative Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared:

"This conclusion is inescapable, that the President is reconciled to active military intervention if such intervention is needed to defeat the Axis in this war. But our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President. Nonsense, Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our transport ships. Even now the tags for identification of the dead and wounded are being printed by the firm of William C. Ballantyne and Co., of Washington."

Professor Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how at the appropriate moment President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into war by an ultimatum demanding instant compliance with terms, which could never have been accepted by any country.

"The memorandum which Senator Hull, with the approval of President Roosevelt, handed to Japan on 26th November, 1941 . . . amounted to the maximum terms of an American policy for the whole Orient." writes Professor Beard, and goes on to say:

"It required no profound knowledge of Japanese history, institutions, and psychology to warrant . . . first that no Japanese Cabinet 'liberal or reactionary,' could have accepted the provisions." and again later:

"The Japanese agent regarded the American memorandum as a kind of ultimatum. This much at least Secretary Hull knew on November 26th."

Thus was the period of maximum intervention short of a shooting war terminated, and a save-face forged for Roosevelt to ship U.S. boys overseas without apparently breaking the spirit of his many promises.

As the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the President became more and more apparent. His deception of the British and their Allies was no less flagrant than his deception of the American people.

As Professor Beard points out on page 576:-

"The noble principles of the Four Freedoms, and the Atlantic Charter were for practical purposes discarded in the settlements, which accompanied the progress and followed the conclusion of the war. To the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China, Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth bear witness."

Some great driving force was clearly at work to induce a President of the United States so to act. We have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the preservation of the British Empire, nor the French Empire, nor the Dutch, that swayed the President. On the contrary, he had advised his ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the cold war that these must be liquidated. It was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their liberties, nor rights under the Atlantic Charter of Four Freedoms which weighed with him. We know now that the British and American armies were actually halted by General Ike Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the Yalta Conference, so that the Red Army of Jewish Bolshevism might overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin.

To quote again from Professor Beard:-

"As a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's despotism,' another despotism was raised to a higher pitch of power."

In conclusion, Professor Beard condenses the many indictments of the President set forth in his book, into 12 major counts, and declares:-

"If these precedents are to stand unimpeached, and to provide sanctions for the continued conduct of America affairs -- the Constitution may be nullified by the President and officers who have taken the oath and are under moral obligation to uphold it. For limited Government under supreme law they may substitute personal and arbitrary government -- the first principle of the totalitarian system against which it has been alleged that World War II was waged -- while giving lip service to the principle of constitutional government."

When we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's book, and consider them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel Roosevelt's As He Saw It, the question arises: whom, and which interests did President Roosevelt not betray. To this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and their interests who planned from the start the use of United States arsenals and Forces to prosecute a war which would annihilate a Europe which had freed itself from Jewish gold and revolutionary control: people who planned to dissolve the British Empire, to forge chains of unrepayable debt, wherewith to coerce Britain to this end; and to enable the Soviets to "bestride Europe like a colossus,"* in other words, International Jewry.

*These very words were used by General Smuts, who added words to the effect that he welcomed such a prospect. It should be remembered that General Smuts was formerly chief legal adviser to the Zionist Organisation in S. Africa.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nameles2.htm

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Here's a theory on Angela Hitler's association with the Vienna Judicia Mensa House-Academy. For some reason this is sometimes "thrown around" probably because of the words "Judaica","Hitler" and "Mensa"... which are not necessarily connected together in a Hitler was a Secret "Jew" scheme.  

1. The Mensa Society as it is known in England and the USA is a definitely a post-WWII creation. In Eastern Europe/Austro-Hungarian Empire it does not have connotations with an "elite" group of people. It was more of an association.

http://www.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/Nav ... istory.htm

2.   Angela Hitler had likely been working for several years at this time and likely "Joined" this academy as a worker-manager before it became exclusively "Jewish". It was probably her home since her mother died in 1907 and the remaining Hitler family members separated.  Angela likely ran this as a both a home and a business.  (NOTE IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH "GENIUS JEWS"--- CSR)

During the Austrian period, Czernowitz had a student home (donated by Jews) which stood open for poor students. Since the Romanians took over, the home no longer accepted Jewish students. The building of a Jewish student home and a Mensa academy for students who were not residents of the city was a worthwhile work which proved very rewarding. In 1923 the Mensa moved into its own home (leader: Dr. Jakob Pelzel).

The lodge Veritas, with the same program started in 1913. Veritas originally had an international character, but later (1923) became purely a Jewish organization. The lodge had no association with a worldwide organization. The membership was recruited from all levels of society. Veritas supported various Jewish organizations like the Worker's Kitchen, the Safa Iwria, the Mensa Academica Judicia, and etc. with small sums. Leon Koenig was president for many years.

http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/Bukowin ... 1_153.html


3. From the OSS files on Hitler, the image of Angela is given a short paragraph that indicates she was simply doing her job and protecting kids living at the home from some threats. She was like most large female "AUSTRIAN GERMANS" of the 1930s -- not active in politics and stubbornly defensive if trouble arose. I don't think she was the type to Kibbutz with the kids, say the KolNidre, or read the Talmud... bake "Kosher Cookies" or do some kind of Jewish dance.  

Angela

She is an elder half-sister of Adolph. She seems to be the most normal one in the family and from all reports is rather a decent and industrious person. During her childhood she became very fond of Adolph despite the fact that she had the feeling that his mother was spoiling him. She is the only one of the family with whom Adolph has had any contact in later years and the only living relative Hitler ever mentioned. When his mother died in 1907 there was a small inheritance which was to be divided among the children. Since the two girls had no immediate means of earning a livelihood the brothers turned over their share to help the girls along. Adolph turned his share over to Angela while Alois turned his over to a younger sister, Paula. Angela later married an official named Raubal in Linz who died not long afterwards. She then went to Vienna where, after the war, she was manager of the Mensa Academica Judaica. Some of our informants knew her during this time and report that in the student riots Angela defended the Jewish students from attack, and on several occasions beat the Aryan students off the steps of the dining hall with a club. She is a rather large, strong peasant type of person who is well able to take an active part.

[Hexzane]

Another discrepancy I have just found on the Rufus's blog newsfromatlantis : http://newsfromatlantis.blogspot.com/20 ... onism.html . It's once again about Dunkirk.

"It made absolutely no sense to allow enemy forces to escape so they could fight on - at a time when he planned another front in the east and drastically reduced the chances of Germany winning."

Very true. Hitler was already planing at this time to invade USSR. So, indeed, it made absolutely no sense to let English armies flee therefore maintaining a second front.

We can also understand why was created the absurd theory that Stalin was just about to attack Germany when Hitler started operation Barbarossa. A theory sustained by cracksmokerepublican :

This is an obvious miss. Germany was set to be invaded by Stalin in the late Summer of 1941 likely in August. Hitler launched Operation Barbarrossa in June 1941 in a pre-emptive attack on the USSR. While they had conducted drills together and worked together on military exchanges in prior years, it was a matter of both forces learning the military conduct and depth of each other in the early and mid-1930s.

It is said by leftists that it's a theory which is famous in nationalist circles because it allows us to make Hitler become the good guy.

But, I think that, in fact, the real goal of this theory is not to make Hitler pass as the good guy against leftists, but to give an explanation to the enormous discrepancy of creating a second front. It's not against leftist, but against nationalists like me who become aware of the fact that Hitler was a jew and that the wwII was faked.

The problem of this theory is that it's ridiculous. Russian forces has retreated during six months up to Moscow. If Stalin was about to make war against Germany, Russian troops wouldn't have retreated like that.

This is why this theory (which off course comes from jews) hasn't become mainstream and is still limited to some nationalist circles. The first six months of the war ridicules it so much that it is untenable.

The theory of the jewish Hitler and the faked wwII explains much better the voluntarily creation of a second front and the fastness of the invasion of Russia.

1) Jewish leaders were obliged to do it in order to explain the final defeat of Hitler. Without the two fronts, it would have been difficult to explain. England would have been defeated, and then, there would have been only USSR against Hitler. And with England defeated, no war in North Africa and no D-day.

2) Jewish leaders wanted the war to last the least possible time. So, they had to make German army wins quickly during the first months, in order to control quickly a big part of Russia and then deport a maximum of jews into camps. If German armies had had a hard time to win, it would have taken much longer. And jewish leaders wanted the war to be the shortest possible.

3) They also had to make Hitler's armies advance very easily at the very beginning of the war, almost without battles. Because, if Russian armies had succeeded in stopping German armies advance and after one or two years, have been obliged to retreat (in order to let Germans deport Russian jews), it would have meant that Germans where beating Russians. Then, people wouldn't have understand why suddenly, Russians would have been able to defeat Germans (second part of the jewish leaders plan). With Germans advancing almost without fighting during six months, the defeat of German armies is much easier to explain : Russian forces were still intact and able to defeat Germans.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

If any book would have the research to prove Hitler was a Jew or Rothschild "Crypto-Zionist" it would be this one--  "51 Documents: Zionism in the Age of Dictators". It doesn't. It indicates the Nazis wanted to rid Germany of the Jews but not for the sake of Israel but for the sake of Germans.   It does show Hitler as a nationalist that won popularity among the common-people as the German nation collapsed. Weimer Germay equals Jew'merica today if you ask me.
Pride is a funny thing...but at times it becomes a very serious business... there is a logical leap of faith necessary to believe "Hitler was working for Jews"... I think it is more complete revulsion of the German People to the Jews which had inveigled themselves into positions of power since their emancipation throughout Europe. Revulsion that went hand in hand with the collapse of Germany.

This Goyim Revulsion to Jews is incidental to the Zionist "Project".  Zionism didn't cause the Revulsion and the Natural Revulsion only incidentally helped Zionism... --CSR
----------
GERMAN ZIONISM AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC

Lenni Brenner

German Jewry was deeply loyal to the Weimar Republic which had put an end
to the discriminations of the Wilhelmine era. Germany's Jews, (0.9 per cent of the
population) were generally prosperous: 60 per cent were businessmen or
professionals; the rest artisans, clerks, students, with only insubstantial numbers of
industrial workers. Most were for liberal capitalism, with 64 per cent voting for the
Deutsche Demokratische Partei (DDP). About 28 per cent voted for the moderate
Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD). Only 4 per cent voted for the
Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (KPD), and the rest were scattered rightists.
Weimar looked safe to all of them as they saw the Nazi vote drop from 6.5 per cent
in 1924 to a mere 2.6 per cent in 1 928. None thought horror lay ahead.

Until the late 1920s Hitler had wasted his time trying to recruit the working
class into his National Socialist German Workers' Party, but few were interested:

Hitler had been for the war, they had finally revolted against it; Hitler was against
strikes, they were good trade unionists. When the Depression finally brought him a
mass following it was the peasants, not the workers, who poured into his movement.
Weimar had changed nothing for them; 27 per cent still tilled less than one hectare
(2.471 acres), another 26 per cent worked less than 5 hectares (12.5 acres). In debt
to the banks even before the crisis, these rural Christians were easily persuaded to
focus on the Jews who, for centuries, had been identified with pawnbroking and
usury. (AMERICA TODAY--CSR) The Christian professional class, already steeped in sabre and beer volkism
from their university days, and the small shopkeepers, resenting the superior
competition from the large Jewish department stores, were the next to break away
from the coalition that had ruled Weimar from its inception and join the Nazis.
From a tiny 2.6 per cent in 1928 the Nazi vote soared to 18.3 per cent in the
elections of 14 September 1930.

Religious Jewry turned to its traditional defence organisation, the
Centralverein, the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith; now,
for the first time, the department-store owners, who had become a prime target for
the attentions of the Nazi brownshirts, began to contribute to the CV's efforts. The
CV's elderly leadership could not understand the collapse of capitalism. They were
simply

............

'It is Right, therefore, that They should Fight against Us'

If the SPD and the KPD must bear their full measure of guilt for Hitler's
triumph, so too must the Zionistische Vereinigung fur Deutschland (the Zionist
Federation of Germany). Although conventional wisdom has always assumed that
the Zionists, with their dire view of anti-Semitism, warned the Jews of the Nazi
menace, this is in fact not true. In 1969, Joachim Prinz, the former President of the
American Jewish Congress—in his youth a fire-eating Zionist rabbi in Berlin —still
insisted that:

Since the assassination of Walther Rathenau in 1922, there was no doubt in
our minds that the German development would be toward an anti-Semitic
totalitarian regime. When Hitler began to arouse, and as he put it 'awaken' the
German nation to racial consciousness and racial superiority, we had no doubt that
this man would sooner or later become the leader of the German nation.51
Yet a diligent search of the pages of the Judische Rundschau, the weekly organ
of the ZVfD, will not reveal such prophecies. When a Jew was killed and several
hundred Jewish stores looted in a November 1923 hunger riot in Berlin, Kurt
Blumenfeld, the Secretary (later President) of the ZVfD, consciously played down
the incident:

There would be a very cheap and effective kind of reaction, and we...
decisively reject it. One could incite deep anxiety among German Jewry. One could
use the excitement to enlist the vacillating. One could represent Palestine and
Zionism as a refuge for the homeless. We do no t wish to do that . We do not wish to
carry off by demagoguery those who have stood apart from Jewish life out of indifference.
But we wish to make clear to them through [our] sincere conviction where
the basic error of Jewish galuth [exile] existence lies. We wish to awaken their
national self-awareness. We wish ... through patient and earnest educational work
[to] prepare them to participate in the upbuilding of Palestine.52

http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres/LBzad.pdf

Also a good read on the Zionists approaching the Nazis:
http://www.counterpunch.org/brenner1223.html

[mchawe]

Having given details of how Hitler peremptorily halted the Panzer Corps on the 22nd May, and kept them inactive for the vital few days, till, in fact, the British troops had got away from Dunkirk,

I saw a movie a long time ago about the evacuation from Dunkirk. It showed the British whilst trying to board the small craft which had come to collect the troops, getting harried by Stuka dive-bombers which made a terrifying screaming noise as they dived towards their target. Was there any truth in that or was it just propaganda ?

[Whaler]

double post

[Whaler]

Here's an interesting excerpt from Carr's Pawns in the Game in which he claims that Hitler was a moderate contending with radical Nazi forces with plans congruent with the Commie terror program.  Carr is devoted to the notion that the global problem is NOT essentially Jewish, but it's a fine book even if that position seems dubious.  Bolding added.  If anyone has further info on this question, thanks in advance.

When Hitler and Mussolini first rose to power they advocated the moderate Fascist policy which demanded that the wrongs done their countries be rectified; that they contain communism;  and curb the powers of the Illuminati who controlled finance and industry.  But as time went on, both Hitler and Mussolini came under the influence of the leaders of the hard core of Nazi War Lords who claimed the only way to establish a permanent peace in the world was by military conquest.  The Nazi leaders sold the top-military leaders in Italy and Japan solidly on the theories and plans advocated by Karl Ritter in 1849.  Franco in Spain refused to go along with their totalitarian plans.  His religious beliefs convinced him that an ideology which denied the existence of an Almighty God was doing the work of the Devil.

The Totalitarian minded leaders in Germany, Italy, and Japan were determined to use Fascism to further their secret Long Range Plans in exactly the same way as their opponents, the international bankers, used Communism.  The immediate plans of the War Lords were to first, defeat the Stalin-controlled Empire;  second, wipe out Communism in Europe;  third, consolidate the control of the Axis Powers on Continental Europe;  fourth, invade Britain and France and subjugate the people, and fifth, to invade and conquer the United States by using two vast pincer movements.  Japan was to land invading forces on the west coast of Mexico in the south and in the Northwest Territories in the north.  Germany was to invade Canada by air in the North and the German-Italian forces were to jump the Atlantic from Africa, and attack the U.S.A. from South America and the Gulf of Mexico.

The Northern invading forces were scheduled to join together at a point in the vicinity of Chicago and push on down the Mississippi while the South-West and South-East invasion forces were to meet at New Orleans and push north up the Mississippi, thus dividing the country into two halves.[1] With the conquest of Britain and the United States the Nazis planned to exterminate the Jews living in these two countries as they had exterminated those they located in Europe.  The international bankers, and big capitalists controlled by them, were listed for immediate liquidation, together with confiscation of all their assets and estates.

While Hitler suffered imprisonment prior to 1934 because he was considered the personal enemy of the Nazi War Lords and the international bankers, he wrote Mein Kampf.  On the very last page he stated:  "The party (National-Socialist) as such stands for positive Christianity but does not bind itself in the matter of creed to any profession.  It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and without us."

In 1933 Hitler also announced his policy in regard to Britain.  He pointed out that Marx, Lenin, and Stalin had all repeatedly reiterated that before International communism could reach its final objectives, Britain and her Empire had to be destroyed.  Under these circumstances Hitler said:  "I am willing to help defend the British Empire by force if called upon." Of the Treaty of Versailles Hitler wrote:  "It was not a British interest (intention) but, in the first place, a Jewish one to destroy Germany."  He also wrote:  "Even in England there is a continual struggle going on between the representatives of British States' interests and the Jewish World dictatorship.  Whilst England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the Jew to-day is a rebel in England and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be started there also."

Hitler never wavered from his personal opinion that the survival of Germany as a great power depended upon an alliance with the British Empire.  In 1936 he instituted proceedings to try to bring about this alliance.  He arranged for unofficial conversations to take place between German and British diplomats, and after the meetings failed to produce the alliance he so greatly desired, he said:  "No sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England's alliance.  It would have meant renunciation of our colonies;  and importance as a sea power;  and refraining from interference with British industry by competition."[2]  He considered all these German concessions would have been worthwhile if only he had been able to bring about the German-British alliance.  His failure to bring about the British Alliance caused him to weaken in his opposition to the totalitarian ideology as advocated by the extreme Nazi War Lords.  

The failure of the conference convinced Hitler that no moderate policy would ever break the control the international bankers had over British Foreign policy.  He reluctantly began to concede that Karl Ritter had been right when he said:  "The power the Jewish financiers hold over Communism must be destroyed, as well as of those who are members of the world revolutionary movement, before peace and economic freedom can be restored to the world."

The purpose of this book is to record the events in history which provided the 'Causes' which produced the 'Effects' we experience to-day.  We are not concerned with the 'Rights' or 'Wrongs' of the decisions made by individuals, except to judge for ourselves whether the decisions furthered the Devil's Plan or were in accordance with the Plan of God.  The only value of historical research is to obtain knowledge of how, and why, mistakes were made in the past so we can try to avoid making similar mistakes in the future. The momentous meeting regarding the possibility of an alliance between Great Britain and Germany took place in January 1936.  Lord Londonderry represented the British government and Goering, Herr Ribbentrop, and Hitler, Germany.

An authority on this phase of history informed me that Herr Goering and Herr Von Ribbentrop outlined the history of the World Revolutionary Movement to Lord Londonderry, explaining the detailed research work done by Professor Karl Ritter and others.  They reasoned that the only successful way to fight a totalitarian-minded conspiracy was to use Total War.  They explained to Lord Londonderry their plan was to attack all Communist-controlled countries;  liberate the people, and execute all Communist traitors.  They claimed the only way to wipe out Communism was the extermination of the whole Jewish Race.[3]  They produced masses of documented evidence which, they claimed, was authentic, to prove Communism was organized, financed, and directed by powerful,wealthy and influential Jews, who also organized, financed and directed secret ambitions to bring about the Messianic Age.[4]

Hitler is said to have promised that he would continue to oppose the extreme totalitarian plans of the Nazi War Lords and confine his activities against Communism to Europe, providing the British government would enter into an alliance with Germany.  When Lord Londonderry said he doubted if the British government would take part in a plan to abolish Communism, which called for 'Genocide,' Hitler compromised.  He said Germany would undertake the task alone provided England would enter into an agreement that the two countries would under no circumstances war against each other for ten years.  Hitler argued that the only way Britain, France, and Russia could shake off the unbearable and ruinous burden of ever-increasing national debts was to repudiate them and restore the issuing of money to the government where it originally and rightfully belonged.

Hitler is said to have pointed out that the purpose of his National-Socialist party ... call it Fascism ... was to put an end at once, and all time, to the power and influence the international money-lenders exerted on national and international affairs by reason of the fact that they were forcing every nation that still claimed to be independent, further and further into their debt.  He is said to have quoted what Benjamin Disraeli made one of his characters say in his famous book Coningsby, "So you see, dear Coningsby, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."[5]

Goering is said to have backed up the Führer by pointing out that history had proved that the wealthy and influential Jews had obtained economic and political control of every country into which they had infiltrated by using illegal methods and corrupt practices. Herr Von Ribbentrop is reported to have supported Goering's arguments by reminding Lord Londonderry that as recently as 1927-28 when he was in Canada, the Stevens Royal Commission into the Canadian Customs Service proved that the country was being robbed annually of over ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS by smuggling and other kinds of illegal traffic and trade organized and directed from an International Headquarters.  He pointed out that evidence placed before the Royal Commissioner had proved that in order to get away with gangsterism and licentiousness to 'Fix' thousands of public servants and hundreds of government officials, even as high as cabinet level.  He pointed out that what had been absolutely proved to exist in Canada was ten times as bad in the United States of America.  

Ribbentrop reasoned that the only way to clean up the mess was to 'Get' the three hundred men at the top who were 'The Secret Power' master-minding the negative forces whose various evil influences, and criminal activities, all furthered the Long Range Plan of those who directed the World Revolutionary Movement.[6]

Goering is said to have reviewed once more the part the international bankers had played in bringing about, directing, and financing the Russian revolution in 1917, which had enabled them to bring into existence the adverse conditions being experienced throughout the world at that time.[7]

Hitler reminded Lord Londonderry of the millions of Christians who had been ruthlessly slaughtered in the Communized countries since October, 1917, and argued that the men responsible could not be considered as anything else than international gangsters. The final item of discussion was the manner in which Stalin had been instructed to turn Spain into a Communist dictatorship.  The whole pattern of international intrigue was laid bare.  The manner in which Germany had been enabled to secretly re-arm:  The way French politics were controlled by Grand Orient Freemasonry.[8]  The manner in which Britain had been persuaded to disarm, while her potential enemies were being re-armed. According to the Germans, it would be impossible for the world to enjoy peace and prosperity as long as those who directed the World Revolutionary Movement insisted on fomenting wars in order to create conditions favourable for revolutionary action.  They argued both international Communism and political Zionism had to be stopped and the movements ended at once, or another war was inevitable, because the Secret Powers, pulling the strings, were determined they were going to reach their ultimate objectives.

Hitler was a great orator, and my informant claimed he ended the discussions with a plea that Lord Londonderry return to England and persuade the British government to join in the suggested alliance with Germany "because I am convinced that the British Empire and the Roman Catholic Church are both universal institutions, the continuance of which is absolutely essential as bulwarks for the preservation of law and order throughout the world in the future."

What has been said here of Hitler is so absolutely foreign to the general idea that the following historical facts and documents are quoted to support what has been said :

Lord Londonderry returned to London following the conference and made his report to the British cabinet.  On February 21st, 1936, he wrote Herr Von Ribbentrop.  He referred to the conversations he had had.  The letter reads in part :

"They (Hitler and Goering) forget that here (in England) we have not experienced the devastation of a revolution for several centuries...  In relation to the Jews ... we do not like persecution, but in addition to this, there is the material feeling that you are taking on a tremendous force which is capable of having repercussions all over the world ... it is possible to trace their participation in most of these international disturbances which have created so much havoc in different countries, but on the other hand, one can find many Jews strongly ranged on the other side who have done their best, with the wealth at their disposal, and also by their influence, to counteract those malevolent and mischievous activities of fellow Jews."[9]

After Hitler realized his hopes to bring about an alliance between Germany and Britain had failed, he leaned further and further to the 'Right.'  He became convinced that it was impossible for an individual, groups of individuals, or even a single nation to break the power and influence the international bankers exercised over the so-called democratic nations by reason of their financial control and the encumbrance of their national debts.

In July, 1936, the Spanish Civil War broke out and Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were drawn closer together.  It was the fact that Franco had had to start a Civil War in Spain to prevent Spain being Communized without a struggle, that caused Hitler to round out his boundaries and concentrate military power on his borders.  He was determined to make sure that Stalin, who he knew was only the agent of the international bankers appointed to rule over Russia, would not extend his dictatorship over other European countries.  Every step Hitler took in the direction was termed 'Acts of aggression' by the anti-Fascist press.  Hitler explained such moves as 'preventive' wars or occupations.  He stated that he was primarily concerned in 'preventing' Stalin establishing his sphere of influence on or about the 40th parallel of latitude in Europe.  If he was allowed to, Germany, Britain, and other northern European countries would be entrapped like flies in a spider's web.

Hitler had not only failed to bring about the British alliance, but he had earned the enmity of the Nazi War Lords who advocated totalitarian methods for solving the very complicated and dangerous problem.  They did not want an alliance with England.  They did not want to see Christianity flourish.  They did not agree with Hitler's "preventive" measures.  They didn't agree with anything Hitler did to hinder their plans to wage 'Total War,' first against Russia, then against Britain and France.  The 'hard core' of the pagan Nazi War Lords demanded that Hitler take offensive action, as the best defence against gradual encroachment by Communist underground and Stalin's armed forces.  When Hitler refused to go all the way with them, they decided to get rid of him.  The first attempt was made on his life.  The Nazi War Lords next tried to weaken the control he had gained over the German people. They launched a campaign to sell their Aryan Pagan ideology to the German people.  They taught the superiority of the Aryan Race.  They advocated war to establish the undisputed supremacy of the Aryan State.  They made it a fundamental principle that all men and women of Aryan blood should give unlimited obedience to the Head of the Aryan State and acknowledge no mortal as above him.  This campaign was attributed to Hitler, and the anti-Fascist press throughout the world cried to high heaven that Hitler was a pagan, and a Black-shirted totalitarian-minded Nazi War Lord.  Thus started the clashes between both Catholic and Protestant clergy and the state.  The clergy condemned the Nazi ideology on the grounds that those who preached it were preaching the deification of men.

The Nazi leaders charged that both Catholic and Protestant clergy were breaking the laws and defying the authority of the state.  The Roman Catholic and Protestant bishops replied by stating the extreme Nazi doctrines were antagonistic and contrary to the Divine Plan of Creation.  The Nazi leaders countered with the argument that the Church had no right to interfere in matters of state.
 
Hitler tried to pacify the clergy by banning the Grand Orient Lodges which were known to be the headquarters of the Aryan extremists throughout Germany.  The Nazi leaders rendered this step abortive changing them over to "Orders of German Chivalry." Hitler, in order to maintain a united front against Communism, tried to pacify the Nazis by issuing an edict that any clergyman preaching against the laws of the state, or questioning its supremacy, would be subjected to the full process of the law and, if found guilty, would suffer the penalties provided for such 'crimes'.  This situation provides another example of how the forces of evil divided two powerful forces which were both combating a common enemy.

The anti-Fascist propaganda made the most of the disagreement between Hitler and the Pope.  It is true Pope Pius XI denounced Naziism in no uncertain terms in the Encyclical of March 14th, 1937 "on the condition of the Church in Germany."  He told Roman Catholics that he had weighed every word of the encyclical in the scales of truth and clarity.  In reference to the Nazi conception of the superiority of the Aryan race and the supremacy of the state he said :

"While it is true that the race or the people;  the state or a form of government;  the representatives of a civil power, or other fundamental elements of human society have an essential and honourable place in the natural order, nevertheless, if anyone detaches them from this scale of earthly values and exalts them as the supreme form and standard of all things, even of religious values, deifying them with idolatrous worship, he perverts and falsifies the order of things created and constituted by God, and is far from true faith in God, and from a conception of life in conformity therewith...Our God is a personal God, transcendent, Almighty, Infinite, Perfect.  One in the Trinity of Persons and three in the unity of the Divine Essence;  creator of the universe;  Lord; King; and ultimate purpose of the history of the world;  who does not suffer and can never suffer any other divinity besides Him ...  Only superficial minds can fall into the error of speaking of a National God, of a National Religion, of foolishly attempting to restrict within the narrow confines of a single race that God, who is the Creator of the world, the King and Law-Giver of all peoples, before Whose greatness the nations are as small as drops of water in a bucket" (Isaias XL-15).

In a pastoral letter dated August 19th, 1938, the bishops of Germany struck out boldly against Nazi ideology.  The letter says that the attitude of the Nazi towards the Christian religion in Germany is in open contradiction with the Fuehrer's assertions...[10]  "What is aimed at is not merely the checking of the growth of the Catholic Church but the wiping out of Christianity and the setting up in its place of a religion which is utterly alien to the Christian belief in One True God."  The letter goes on to point out that the Nazi attack on Dr. Sproll, the Protestant bishop of Rottenburg, clearly proved that the 'persecution' is directed not only against the Catholic
Church but against the whole Christian idea as such...  "An attempt is being made to get rid of the Christian God in order to replace Him with a "German God".  What does a German God mean ?  Is He different from the God of other peoples ?  If so, then there must be a special God for each nation and for each people...  This is the same as saying "There is no God."[11]

What happened in Germany in 1936 has happened in other countries since.  The leaders of 'Black' Naziism joined forces with the leaders of 'Red' Communism in an attack on both the Christian religion and the British Empire.  The totalitarian-minded Nazi War Lords initiated their followers into the German Grand Orient Lodges, using the ancient pagan rites and ritual handed down from the time the barbaric Aryan tribes and the Huns swept over Europe.  The totalitarian-minded men who direct international Communism initiate their leaders into the Grand Orient Lodges of other countries using the ancient Cabalistic Rites of Illuminism.  To understand this situation, it is necessary to recall that Jews have never, under any circumstances, been admitted into the German Grand Orient Lodges since 1785 when the papers found on the body of the Courier of the Illuminati, who was killed by lightning at Ratisbon, were handed over by the police to the Bavarian authorities, and proved that the Grand Orient Lodges in France were being used as the secret headquarters of the Jewish inspired revolutionary movement.

When complicated situations such as these develop, it can be understood why the Roman Catholic Church has taken such a definite stand against 'Black' Naziism, while tolerating the less extreme forms of Fascism, i.e. anti-Communism as practiced by Franco in Spain.  It also explains why Cardinal Mindszenty collaborated with allegedly Fascist leaders who attempted to overthrow Communist domination in his country.

Franco has consistently refused to go off the deep end.  He refused to support German Naziism in World War Two simply because the extreme Nazi Pagan War Lords had become all powerful in Germany.  In Germany, Italy, France, Spain, and Japan, millions of citizens, peaceful by inclination and charitable at heart, found themselves in the position of having to decide whether they became actively Pro-Fascist or Pro-Communist.  They were given Hobson's Choice.  They usually picked what they considered the lesser of two evils.  They were immediately labeled accordingly.

Wow, that was an excellent post. Very thought provoking. A+

[o1OpTiMuS1o]

I just find all of this to be idiodic ramblings of Jewish disinformation, I see DBS posting this bs everyday on his site that Hitlers a Rothschild etc its ridiculous seems he does it because thats what Eustace said and i believe Eustace was totally wrong on the matter still he post Jewish articles support his so called claim by Jewish authors. Then turns around and post negative information about Eustace being a homosexual which i find strangely misleading in his cause since he promotes Eustace so much.

most common article DBS report over and over again for his claim of Hitler, Bush, Rothschild connection

Daryls favorite multiple reposted source i see usually weekly posted on his site
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/se ... ndworldwar

Lets take a look at the author


Duncan Campbell Author who is he?

Guardian Profile - by name and schooling he his surely Scottish Decent
http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/duncancampbell

Duncan Campbell is a freelance writer who worked for the Guardian for more than 20 years, as crime correspondent and Los Angeles correspondent. He previously worked for City Limits, Time Out and LBC. He is the author of two novels, If It Bleeds, published in 2009, and The Paradise Trail, (2008) and five non-fiction books, including The Underworld and That Was Business, This Is Personal.

This shows he was Schooled in Scotland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duncan_Cam ... uardian%29

Duncan Campbell is a British journalist and author. He was a senior reporter/correspondent for The Guardian from 1987 until 2010. He was the Los Angeles and crime correspondent for the paper at one point.

He was educated at Glenalmond College in Scotland. Prior to joining The Guardian, he worked for the London Daily News and City Limits (both defunct), Time Out and LBC Radio.

Campbell is the author of The Paradise Trail, a novel published in 2008. Set largely in India in 1971, it is partly a murder mystery and partly an affectionate depiction of life on the "hippie trail": the cheap hotels and eating places, the music, the drug-fuelled conversations.[1]

It was announced by The Guardian that Campbell will take voluntary redundancy[2] and now works as a freelance writer including for The Guardian.[3]

Lets look at the Scottish name origins of Campbell
When Scotland was Jewish: DNA evidence, archeology, analysis of migrations ...
 By Elizabeth Caldwell Hirschman, Donald Neal Yates
http://books.google.com/books?id=Op3cC6 ... sh&f=false

In Scotland Campbell is a very old Jewish name.




In this matter i cannot find myself referring to his website anymore on his news articles i feel that people are seriously being mislead about Hitler from there.   :down:

[GordZilla]

In this matter i cannot find myself referring to his website anymore on his news articles i feel that people are seriously being mislead about Hitler from there.   :down:

I full heartedly agree!  There's seriously not much to support the notion of Hitler being a 'zionist puppet' except from a few hundred pieces from Jewish sources, like that posted above by Fester, which in return are hardly ever sourced to anything concrete, except other Jewish sources who again source back to themselves (endless circle of BS! p.s. I know those are not Fester's words but a quote from another source) . There is nothing 'thought provoking' about that piece except maybe ; 'what a load of bullocks!'. It's not sourced to anything  just speculation and flat out lies. Then there's the whole issue of the money trail, well frankly that's a red herring too isn't it? It's what he did with the money that matters, that's what I always go on anyways, for me actions speak louder than words (or 'alleged connections' in this case) . As for the case of 'words' Hitler had a great deal to say, I suggest we take some time and focus on his words and actions, go straight to the source as it were. I think you will find out what I have already; this man was genuine.

Again my mind remains open, but when compared to his words and deeds these countless books and speculations (from Jews) bare little to affect me changing my mind on this man. Piper is nailing this topic night after night, I think it's high time for Piper and DBS to get together on it and see what comes out of it. After all it's the truth I want-whichever way it leads me-, not endless opinion  --that's my department  

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Much agreed with you there Gord!   This issue needs to be looked at closely and opened up. Hitler did what he had to do.  The man was genuine, and fighting against the odds as well. Since he was an Austrian, rather than a native born German, this perhaps gave him the perspective to see the entire situation from the outside looking in. People forget... all of the Pro-German Austrians wanted a new larger German "Reich" united with Germany, not just Hitler.

This needs to be examined a little bit deeper after looking at how much the Jewish Fed has basically Scammed the World at this point... Hitler was a "Zionist" is actually a lame smokescreen for a lot of anti-Goyim Jewish scam behaviour, IMHO. --CSR

o1OpTiMuS1o wrote:
In this matter i cannot find myself referring to his website anymore on his news articles i feel that people are seriously being mislead about Hitler from there. :down:

Thanks for posting that o1OpTimuS1o.  :up:   I personally think if DBS really investigated this outside of the whole Hitler was a cypto-"whatever"... he might come around but I'm not going to hold my breath. He might lose some of his "donating friends" if he did, but oh well. That's just my take on it.  

Found some interesting sources on this:

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=wtU0PDLU2s0C

Pages 12-13 are very interesting.

Although the Jewish role in Germany's economy and culture was exaggerated, they were certainly prominent in many fields, giving rise to charges of privilege and domination. This volume probes the texture of German anti-Semitism, distinguishing between traditional and radical Judeophobia and reaching conclusions that will give no comfort to those who assume that Germans were predisposed to become "willing executioners" under Hitler. It also assesses the quality of Jewish responses to racist attacks. The self-defense campaigns of the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith included publishing counter-propaganda, supporting sympathetic political parties, and taking anti-Semitic demagogues to court. Although these measures could only slow the rise of Nazism after 1930, they demonstrate that German Jewry was anything but passive in its responses to the fascist challenge.

The German Jews' faith in liberalism is sometimes attributed to self-delusion and wishful thinking. This volume argues that, in fact, German Jewry pursued a clear-sighted perception of Jewish self-interest, apprehended the dangers confronting it, and found allies in socialist and democratic elements that constituted the "other Germany". Sadly, this profound and genuine commitment to liberalism left the German Jews increasingly isolated as the majority of Germans turned to political radicalism in the last years of the Republic. This full-scale history of Weimar Jewry will be of interest to professors, students, and general readers interested in the Holocaust and Jewish History.

Culture and inflation in Weimar Germany
 By Bernd Widdig

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kvKA ... C&pg=PA227


--------

The Nisko Plan ( promoted more than any  Jews to "Zion" Solution...)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nisko_Plan (Hitler wanted to create an Eastern Polish "Pale of Settlement" for the Jews.)

--------

Author's site (don't know if he's Jewish or not..)

Donald L. Niewyk
Email:   http://smu.edu/history/faculty/niewyk.shtml

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Also, this Allan Bullock book from 1951 which kind of "inspired" them all was written still steeped in "Pro-Allied" propaganda.  Note that Hugh Trevor Roper is a  Jew like Campbell above that o1OpitMuso1 pointed out earlier.

--------

Hitler: A Study in Tyranny

According to Bullock, Hitler was an opportunistic adventurer devoid of principles, beliefs or scruples.

In 1952, Bullock published Hitler: A Study in Tyranny, the first comprehensive biography of Hitler, which he based on the transcripts of the Nuremberg Trials. This book dominated Hitler scholarship for many years. The book characterised Hitler as an opportunistic machtpolitiker ("power politician"). In Bullock's opinion, Hitler was a "mountebank", an opportunistic adventurer devoid of principles, beliefs or scruples whose actions throughout his career were motivated only by a lust for power. Bullock's views led to a debate with Hugh Trevor-Roper in the 1950s who argued that Hitler did possess beliefs, albeit repulsive ones and that Hitler's actions were motivated by them. Bullock's Guardian obituary commented that "Bullock's famous maxim 'Hitler was jobbed into power by backstairs intrigue' has stood the test of time."[1]

When reviewing "Hitler: A Study in Tyranny" in The Times in 1991, John Campbell wrote "Although written so soon after the end of the war and despite a steady flow of fresh evidence and reinterpretation, it has not been surpassed in nearly 40 years: an astonishing achievement."[citation needed]

Later, Bullock to some extent changed his mind about Hitler. His later works show Hitler as much more of an ideologue, who pursued the ideas expressed in Mein Kampf (and elsewhere) despite their consequences. This has become a widely accepted view of Hitler, particularly in relation to the Holocaust.

Other works

Among Bullock's other works were The Humanist Tradition in the West (1985), and The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, a three-volume biography of British Labour Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin, who had a similar background to Bullock. He was also editor of The Harper Dictionary of Modern Thought (1977), a project he suggested to the publisher when he found he could not define the word "hermeneutics".

In the mid-70s Bullock used his committee skills to produce a report which proved to be influential in the classroom, about reading and the teaching of English A Language for Life was published in 1975.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bullock

[o1OpTiMuS1o]

Well im glad to see you guys agree as well did not think i would get that response, going to look over these articles you posted CSR   :up:

[Fester]

Not sure what the beef with Carr is.  Is he Jewish??  

I think the notion he presents that Hitler was moderate and ended up less so as his hopes for an alliance with England died is very interesting.  It also explains the Catholic Churches relationship with "the Nazis" and other things.  Nice item for debunking that particular Jew attack on the Church.

I don't know enough of the details of any of it to take a firm stand.  Where Carr relies on unnamed sources I tried to make clear through the bolding.  

Please indicate where he's relying on Jewish sources or in a loop.  I found it to be full of excellent supporting material and details despite questioning his premise that it ain't a Jewish operation at the top.

As for differences of opinion, it's an interesting subject with lots of room for disagreement and little in the way of conclusive proof.  Unlike 9/11.  Is it plausible that the Satanic Jews controlled Hitler, sure?  What leaders have lived long in open opposition?  I tend to think at this stage that he was legit.  It's a very open topic in my mind and I'm not getting excited if others hold differing views excepting the MSM-horseshit version a la Death Cult Jones.

Some more from Carr's Pawns in the Game.  

Why did the youth of Spain turn in great numbers to Communism ?  If the technique used by those who direct the W.R.M. is to be understood the answer must be found, because it is from the labouring classes, and the youth of the nation, that the revolutionary leaders draw their shock troops.

Investigation reveals that Azana represented himself as an intellectual with a sincere belief in Socialism.  He was openly anti-religious.  He protested, however, that he was not in agreement with the terrorism advocated and carried out by the Anarchists and the Communists.  Once he obtained the necessary political power, however, he used it to have the republican government abolish religious teaching orders from the schools.  He engaged Francisco Ferrer to establish secularism in the schools.  Instead of opening the school day with a prayer to Almighty God, the new secular teachers opened the classes by having the pupils sing :

"We are the sons of the revolution
We are the sons of liberty.
With us comes the dawning
Of a new humanity."

A translation of another 'Hymn' sung at the beginning and end of class periods in Barcelona schools is as follows :

"Sling the bomb;  place well the mine;  grasp firm the pistol,
Pass on the word of revolution ... Help for the Anarchists.
Stand to arms till death;  with petrol and dynamite destroy the government."

The news editors of British and American papers refused to publish the truth because it sounded so fantastic.  Very similar 'Hymns' were broadcast in English from Moscow for the instruction of English Communists during 1937-38.

The most damning evidence, proving the systematic method used to subvert, and pervert, youth into becoming revolutionaries, was supplied by Francisco Ferrer himself.  In a letter to a revolutionary comrade he wrote :

"In order not to scare people and give the government (republican) a pretext for closing down my establishments I call them 'Modern Schools', and not schools for Anarchists.  My wish is to bring about the revolution.  For the time being, however, one must be content to implant the idea of violent upheaval in the minds of the young.  They must learn that against the police, and the clergy, there is only one means of action... bombs and poison."[4]

When Ferrer was captured by Franco's forces during the Civil War he was tried as a traitor to Spain.  The above letter was used as evidence.  He was found guilty and executed.  The High Council of the Grand Orient of Paris protested to Masonic Lodges all over the world claiming that Ferrer had been murdered because of his Anti-Catholic activities. Investigation into the youth training programme revealed the methods used to corrupt the morals of the youth of a nation also.  Lenin had said :  "The best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals."  His word being law in Communist organizations, all members work secretly to make young people of both sexes anti-social and immoral.

Children up to teen-age are taught to rebel against the discipline of the home.  Parents are represented to their children as old-fashioned.  Parental authority is scoffed at.  The subverters argue that parents have lied to their children since they were old enough to listen, regarding Santa Claus, and where babies come from.  The subversives claim parents are the victims of reactionary teachings and capitalistic exploitation.  The child is encouraged to educate the parents in regard to modern and progressive ideas.  They are warned that, for their own good, they must refuse to be dominated or disciplined by their parents.  The purpose of this subversive campaign is to destroy the sanctity, and unity, of the home which is the foundation upon which our civilization is founded.

To rob children of their respect for the ministers of religion the subversives first represent them as being chosen from the less intelligent or physically retarded members of families.  They are ridiculed as spineless 'holy joes', 'womanish do-gooders', and servants of the ruling classes.  Quoting from Marx, children are told :  "Religion is the opium of the people, because it teaches acceptance of poverty, sickness, and hard work as good for the soul."

The Christian child is poisoned against the ministers of his religion by being told the most fantastic slanders against them in connection with their private lives.  They are presented as 'sheep in wolves clothing';  as 'black crows' feeding upon the gullibility of their parishoners.  

If, as often happens, a minister or priest does become involved in a scandal it is played up for all it is worth. The Christian religion is ridiculed in a most nauseating manner.  Christ is represented as the illegitimate son of Mary, a young Jewess, who, in order to save her face, hoaxed Joseph into believing she had been conceived by the Holy Ghost.  Christ as an adult is depicted as a faker.  His miracles are said to be illusions cleverly performed as magicians perform them to-day.  The twelve Apostles are said to have been his accomplices.  The so-called comic "Mandrake The Magician" is often used to illustrate how a hypnotist and magician can fool the public.

One favourite story told Christian children is that Christ was a bootlegger at a very early age.  Subversives claim he pretended to work a miracle at the marriage feast of Cana in order to sell his bootleg wine.  They even accused Christ, and all Roman Catholics, of being cannibals.  They support their arguments with the biblical quotation that Christ admonished his followers that unless they ate his flesh, and drank his blood, they could not have eternal life. Teen-aged youths are introduced to companions who teach them liberalism which is soon turned to licentiousness.  They are taught the Anarchist conception of life.  The less laws, the better.  Do as you like.  According to subversive teachers, there is only one sin and that is disobedience to orders given by authorized leaders.  There are only two crimes — neglect of duty and betrayal of party secrets.

The next step is to lead anti-social youth into actual conflict with the police.  They start them off by linking them up with some 'gang'.  Young Communist leaders egg the other members on.  They dare them to do things outside the law.  They force them into fights to prove their physical courage.  They inveigle them into petty crime and then lead them deeper into the jungle of the Communist organized underworld.[5]

The publication of Crime and Sex Comics is part of the Communist psychological warfare.  These Comics are calculated to awaken in children hidden and suppressed sadistic tendencies and to weaken the moral armour of children who are otherwise normal.  Any 'professor' who claims Crime and Sex Comics do not influence children in the way the Illuminati wants them to go is either a fool or a knave.

Toy guns, soldiers, revolvers, movies, with plenty of crime and shooting, are all calculated to break down the finer feelings of normal Christian children and acclimatize them to the use of weapons, scenes of violence, and sudden death. Pornographic books, and magazines are circulated profusely at low prices, because such literature is calculated to destroy the thin veneer of virtue and respectability which civilized Christian moral codes have caused us to develop.

Few people realize the important part modern movies play in subverting youths away from their homes, their country, and their religion.  Many movies show an hour of film in which the criminals and bad men and women do everything that is forbidden by our laws and moral code and devote one minute during which the law catches up with them, or they die because of their sins.  Films taken of actual fighting during the Mexican revolution in 1913 were shown in Galveston, Texas.  The sight of seeing men killed in battle, or being dragged from their homes and slaughtered by revolutionaries caused women to scream and faint, and men to vomit.  Public opinion caused the showings, to be prohibited.  To-day these scenes are shown on films advertised as "Children's Special" for Saturday afternoon performances.  That is just one illustration of how the general public, and particularly the children, have been systematically
hardened to accept the sight of violence and bloody death as normal.  It supports the revolutionary motto that "Much needed reforms can only be brought about speedily by revolutionary action."
 
In every country not subjugated to date the directors of the World Revolutionary Movement have set up private Film Agencies which supply the most obscene pictures imaginable for presentation to private parties.  These films illustrate every form of sexual depravity known to man.  They are used for the purpose of demoralizing youth so they can be recruited into revolutionary organizations.  This statement is proved by the fact that the laws barring them in the USSR are strictly enforced.
 
Youths who prove themselves to be anti-social, anti-religious, hardened, and brutalized, are sent to Moscow and taught "Revolutionary Warfare, and the Art of Street Fighting".  This is a different course from that given prospective labour leaders and intellectuals.
Revolutionary psychological warfare is accomplishing its purpose in the Western World as it did in Spain.  This is proved by the fact that no person loses any sleep nowadays when the last thing they hear before going to bed is a recital of the details of air disasters, automobile accidents, crimes, and brutal slayings.  A night-cap of that kind would have been too strong to induce sleep fifty years ago.

Public opinion is no longer aroused to action when the newspapers blandly report that several thousand Jews were systematically exterminated in gas chambers by anti-Semitics, or that ten thousand Christians were martyred because of their anti-Communist convictions by Béla Kun or Chinese sadists.  Such horrors are now accepted as every day occurrences.  We are being rendered immune to the reactions we once experienced when violence of any kind came to our attention.  We no longer are disturbed by the overthrow of established governments by force.  If we were, we would have done something to stop what has been going on.  People listen to those
who continually cry, as they did in Spain, "Communism can never cause a revolution here".  They listen to those who give them a sense of false security.  The majority of citizens are like children, who hide their heads under the blankets when they fear danger.  It should be remembered that pulling the bedclothes over one's head never saved a person from an assassin, a rapist, or an exploding bomb.

A few illustrations will show how psychological warfare worked in Spain.  We must remember always that Lenin said :  "Part of the training of all revolutionary youths must consist of robbing a bank, blowing up a police station and the liquidating of a traitor or a spy."  Not until a youth has been drained dry of the milk of human kindness, and all feelings of sympathy, is he considered qualified for party membership.  This is a vastly different status from that of a 'Fellow Traveller'.

As the day chosen for the revolt drew near in Spain, the purveyors of pornographic literature and obscene pictures became so bold they took their stand at the entrances to churches and offered their wares to the congregations going in and coming out.  The outside covers of these publications usually showed a picture of priests and nuns engaged in sexual high-jinks.  Mr. Edward Knoblaugh,[6] who is recognized as an authority on the Civil War in Spain, was so struck by this anti-clerical campaign that he wrote :  "Occasionally delegates of Protestant clergymen came to Loyalist Spain to investigate stories they had read of anticlerical activities.  

These delegations were warmly received.  Great pains were taken to convince them they had been badly misled.  Special guides were detailed to show them around.  They saw only what the Communist authorities wanted them to see.  After a day or two they were hustled home, suitably impressed."

But one day there was a slip up.  A delegation of clergymen stopped at a book-stall to admire some rare old volumes.  Before the guide could prevent it they saw also copies of "La Traca" and "Bicharracos Clericales".  The covers portrayed priestly orgies with semi-naked nuns.  Both magazines were profusely illustrated with obscene pictures.  Mr. Knoblaugh commented :  "The delegates left in a huff".

The situation in Spain between 1923 and 1936 was very similar to that which exists in Canada between the French and English speaking population to-day.  The Basque people have their own language, culture, and traditions, which date back into antiquity.  They are deeply religious and very proud.  Like many French Canadians they believed they deserved National Independence.  To achieve this objective they organized a separatist movement to liberate the Basque people from the rest of Spain.  As was only natural, the plotters of the revolutionary movement in Spain didn't overlook such a situation.  The Basque people were devout Roman Catholics.  They
believed they were justified in fighting for political independence if necessary.  The vast majority however, would never have knowingly affiliated with the Communist Party to achieve their goal.  Yet that is exactly what happened.  Marxist 'Cells' infiltrated into Basque society.  They hid their real identity so well, they became the leaders of the "Separatists".  Then, like the Judas Goat, they led the Basques to slaughter.  Operating under the banners of intense patriotism and religious fervour, the Basque leaders, President Aguirre, Gird, and Negrin, blended and beat into an unbelievable mass, Christ's cross, the pistol of Anarquism, and the sickle and hammer of Communism.  Then, when the revolt started, the masses were abandoned to their fate.  Aguirre was head of the Basque State and generalissimo of the Basque armies.  He sat in his office in Bilbao, while hundreds of Catholic priests and other leaders of Basque
society were systematically murdered.  Their martyrdom naturally increased the hatred existing between the Basques and Spain.

F.J. Olondriz wrote the foreword to the book The Red Persecution in the Basque Country, written by José Echeandia.  He said :  "When the day arrived the Basque separatists, blind with passion, many of them forgetting their faith, and their Catholic sentiments, felt closely and firmly united to the Communists, to the Atheists, and to the Anarchists ... and they launched into a war, and made themselves responsible for slaughter, and believed all means were licit, rebelliously ignoring the peremptory words of their religious leader, Pope Pius XI, as contained in his encyclical 'Divini Redemptoris' — Communism is intrinsically perverse, and it cannot be
admitted that those who wish to serve the Christian civilization may in any way co-operate with it."  How well some of our top-level statesmen should have remembered those words of wisdom when they tried to co-operate with Stalin during World War II.  Another truth Government leaders must never forget is the fact that Communists, and all other international groups, are used by the Illuminati to further their own secret plans and ambitions.
 
_________________________
1 Exactly as agents of the W.R.M. drafted the Federal Reserve Banking legislation in the U.S.A. 1910 and 1913
and the 'Palestine Mandate' in England in 1916.
2 Police seized 90,000 rifles;  33,000 revolvers;  and 500,000 rounds of ammunition and a tremendous amount of
counterfeit money.
3 See The Bolshevik, October issue, 1930.
4 It was to finance Ferrer's 'Training Schools' for youth that Moscow subscribed the $200,000 previously
mentioned.  In Toronto in 1954 there were seventeen such 'Training Schools'.  There were several in Sudbury.  All
big cities of population have them.
5 The sex orgy that took place in the Ford Hotel in Toronto, October 23, 1954, after the Red Feather Football game,
involved dozens of teen-agers of both sexes.  It was a typical example of what Communist influence, secretly
exerted, can have on the youth of any nation.
6 Mr. Knoblaugh was a 'Correspondent in Spain'.  He published a book with that title.

[o1OpTiMuS1o]

Piper a good interview about Hitler and his new book coming out on Hitler

Mike and Carolyn don't hold back during this politically-incorrect hour.
Topics include:
* Jewish power in America laying groundwork for thought control legislation;
* Those who bring about world war to destroy us will themselves be destroyed;
* Zionism is the political arm of Judaism;
* Hitler hate on the Internet;
* Mike's upcoming book: The Hitler Century.

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=13852

[GordZilla]

Carr is devoted to the notion that the global problem is NOT essentially Jewish, but it's a fine book even if that position seems dubious

It's that comment right there that tells me all I need to know. I think any historical investigator worth his salt would know flat out that it is MOST DEFINATELY a Jewish problem. If he does not then I pretty much write them off right there. Unfair? maybe. I'm no genius but even I know the 'global problem ' is  Jewish. I trust no historical investigator or revisionist that can't first acknowledge this very simple to prove point. If they can't, they are most definitely hiding something, imho. Especially considering this person is supposedly studying history in search of honest answers. Sorry, but I've seen it way too often. The stink test is that (Jewish global domination as fact)  and knowing  the Holocaust is utter B.S.  ... if a historian cannot see those 2 points then that historian is incompetent or blind or has an agenda of his own.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

321bh3pk]

[Hexzane]

Sorry for the inconvenience, I put the first text of this topic in French. I do that because it has some strange tendencies to disappear from the French web. I hope it will stay longer on this board.

"Hitler était un juif mis au pouvoir pour obliger les juifs à aller en Israël.

Ca semble incroyable, mais vous allez très vite voir le truc.

Il était clair dès la fin du 19ème siècle (et probablement avant), que les leaders juifs voulaient recréer Israël. Ils avaient réalisé pas mal d'actions et de déclarations dans ce sens. Et à partir des années 20, le mouvement s'était accéléré. Il était alors clair qu'Israël serait créé bientôt, vers les années 1940/50.

Ils avaient pour ça toute la puissance voulue. Ca ne représentait aucun problème pour eux de prendre la Palestine.

MAIS, les leaders juifs avaient un énorme problème. Comme les juifs étaient très bien en Europe à faire suer le Burnous du goy, il était évident que très peu d'entre auraient voulu venir en Israël et que les leaders juif se seraient retrouvés avec un pays quasiment vide de population. Et sans population importante, la création de l'état d'Israël aurait bien sur été impossible.

Si les juifs étaient restés dans cette situation archi favorable en Europe, Israël n'aurait jamais pu être créée.

Donc, si les leaders juifs voulaient avoir des millions de juifs en Israël vers les années 40 ou 50, ils avaient désespérément besoin de quelqu'un qui : volerait les biens des juifs (maisons, argent, etc...), les enverraient dans des camps, de préférence dans des pays étrangers (pour qu'ils ne connaissent pas la langue du pays). Et ce leader anti-juif ne devait pas seulement être capable de déporter les juifs de son propre pays, mais les juifs de nombreux autres pays européens. Du coup, il devait faire des guerres contre les autres pays européens, et les gagner pendant quelque temps (avant de les perdre une fois le travail de déportation réalisé).

Et le leader anti-juif en question, c'était Hitler.

Donc, bien sur, l'ascension d'Hitler n'était pas du tout un hasard. Il a été mis là pour réaliser le plan des leaders juifs. Et bien sur, c'était un juif. Mettre un goy à cette place, avec autant de pouvoir, aurait été beaucoup trop dangereux pour les leaders juifs.

C'est ce qui explique son incroyable ascension dans un pays depuis longtemps dominé par les juifs, son financement par de grandes entreprises, le fait qu'il n'ait pas détruit les armées anglaises à Dunkerque, qu'il n'ait pas cherché à contrôler le détroit de Gibraltar, qu'il ait attaqué sur deux fronts à la fois, etc...

Et la guerre était une guerre bidon. Hitler a gagné au début parce que c'était voulu, organisé. C'était parce qu'il ne devait pas seulement mettre les juifs allemands dans les camps, mais aussi les juifs de France, de Belgique, d'Italie, de Pologne, de Russie, etc... Les erreurs stratégiques des alliés n'en étaient pas. Ils ont volontairement perdu au départ pour qu'Hitler puisse faire ensuite ses rafles de juifs. Ca ne posait pas de problème, puisque les leaders alliés étaient tous juifs ou demi-juifs (il fallait que les leaders juifs controlent entièrement la situation, pour qu'il n'y ait pas de risque de dérapage). Et si Hitler a gagné aussi vite au début, c'est parce que les leaders juifs n'avaient aucun intérêt à ce que l'opération, désagréable pour les juifs du peuple, dure longtemps. Et une fois le travail de déportation terminé, comme le plan avait été réalisé, Hitler a commencé à perdre la guerre.

Bien sur, il ne s'est pas suicidé. Il a fuit quelque part et a du mourir bien plus tard.

Et bien sur, les gouvernements des USA et des pays européens, tous dominés à l'époque par des juifs, ont refusé l'immigration de nombreux juifs dans leur pays pour obliger ceux-ci à aller en Israël. Ce refus de l'immigration juive de la part des USA, de l'Angleterre, etc.., parait complètement illogique avec la version historique officielle, vu que par ailleurs, ils étaient sensés combattre Hitler en grande partie à cause de son antisémitisme. Mais ça devient parfaitement logique avec la présente version. Pour que les juifs aillent en Israel, il fallait refermer la nasse en laissant une seule ouverture conduisant vers... Israel. Un peu comme quand on dirige du bétail vers un enclos ; on essaye de leur couper toute porte de sortie pour qu'ils ne puissent aller que vers l'enclos.

Le soudain et incroyable antisémitisme de Staline (qui était en fait un juif) après 1942, était aussi organisé pour ça. Avec un Staline antisémite, les juifs russes ou les juifs déportés en Russie par les Allemands (il y en a eu apparemment), ainsi que les juifs se trouvant en Europe centrale (zone désormais contrôlée par les soviétiques) étaient poussés à émigrer vers Israël.

On peut penser que le maccarthisme était aussi un élément du plan des leaders juifs. Comme les Etats-Unis ne pouvaient pas être antisémites après la guerre, les leaders juifs ont remplacé ça par de l'anticommunisme (les juifs européens de l'époque étaient souvent communistes, ou avaient des parents ou des amis communistes). Du coup, ça leur a permis d'éviter que les juifs de base émigrent aux USA plutôt qu'en Israël. Et une fois les juifs bien implantés en Israël, les leaders juifs ont laissé tomber le maccarthisme (vers 1953).

La fausse opposition entre l'Angleterre et les juifs à cette époque, a été créée aussi pour cette raison (et aussi pour alimenter la paranoïa des juifs de base).

Quand on comprend tout ça, tout devient beaucoup plus clair et logique.

Quand au nom Hitler, c'est un dérivé de Hiedler. Et Hiedler, ça peut être un dérivé de Adler. Apparemment, les juifs changent parfois une lettre d'un nom. Et puis, il est connu que c'était un descendant d'un certain Schicklgruber (nom juif). Et de toute façon il y a une tombe d'un gars appelé Adolf Hitler en Allemagne ou en Autriche. Et c'est la tombe d'un juif.

Quand on comprend ça, on peut alors comprendre pourquoi les juifs ont provoqué la première guerre mondiale. Quand on regarde la carte du moyen-orient avant la guerre, on voit l'énorme empire Turc. Après la guerre, l'empire s'est effondré et est remplacé par de nombreux pays de petite ou moyenne importance. C'est sur que l'empire Turc était un gros problème pour les leaders sionistes : 1) pour la création d'Israel ; 2) et après ça, pour sa survie (le fait d'avoir des pays de petite ou moyenne importance à coté d'Israel est évidemment bien mieux que d'avoir un énorme empire). Donc, il est évident qu'ils l'ont détruit vers 1920 dans le but d'être capable plus tard de créer Israel. On sait maintenant que les jeunes turcs étaient en fait des cryptos juifs. La première guerre mondiale a aussi été faite pour créer les conditions préalables à l'ascension d'Hitler et à la réalisation de la révolution communiste en Russie, qui, on l'a vu plus haut, étaient elles-mêmes des conditions préalables à la création d'Israel."

[Hexzane]

Another discrepancy about Hitler and the nazis, is that you almost don't have any book about the jews and their plots, or about Freemasons.

Nazis were in power during 12 years (between 1933 and 1945), and there is almost not even one book about the subject.

Whereas if Hitler and the nazis had been for real, we should have dozens of very well documented books, edited in hundred of thousand of copies, all traduced in many languages.

But if Hitler and the top ranked nazis were in fact jews, it becomes completely normal.

[o1OpTiMuS1o]

Sorry for the inconvenience, I put the first text of this topic in French. I do that because it has some strange tendencies to disappear from the French web. I hope it will stay longer on this board.

and would that be a hint of French Connection DBS 2ndary account    :lol:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

DBS's seven main "proofs" of crypto-Zionist Nazism debunked (this theory is a complete fabrication)

Start at 42:00
[youtube:1zlthb10]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi2w4-utBBk[/youtube]1zlthb10]

[Hexzane]

and would that be a hint of French Connection DBS 2ndary account    :lol:

If I was DBS, this text in French would already be on his website. I wouldn't have to put it here hoping it won't be deleted once again.