Deanna Spingola with Carolyn Yeager and Jim Condit Jr - Hitler a Zionist?

[GordZilla]

Deanna Spingola with Carolyn Yeager and Jim Condit Jr - Debate Alleged Hitler Zionism Connections can be found here;

http://www.archive.org/details/DeannaSp ... egedHitler

(At the bottom of the page -large file unfortunately)

[pas]

I've been looking forward to a discussion like this and it was very interesting.
Quite funny at times cause these ladies don't mess about, especially Mrs. Yaeger.

Personally i would go with J. Condits position but i certainly don't dismiss Mrs. Yaeger's work, i think she's done some great research.

Thanks for posting GordZilla.

[GordZilla]

Well I personally favour Mrs Yeager's position, although I find her debate etiquette a bit lacking, she is right -IMHO- that most (if not all) sources of Hitler being either Jewish, or funded by Jews, or a Zionist are from but a handful of sources who again are mostly Jewish themselves. If you actually listen to Hitler's speeches or read his book you will find this very hard to believe. But alas I don't think this debate is over yet, I'm looking forward to the next time these two debate (if there is one).

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Thanks for posting Gord.  
It's a good debate. Yeager has the better of the argument since she has done a lot research with several German researchers, revisionists and translators.  Condit, while very interesting, pretty much does repeat a lot of Jewish sources.

Problem for Condit is that Hitler actually did fight the Jews, Communists, Soviets and stopped the invasion of all of Europe by the Jews-Stalin-Soviets....Condit thinks Hitler and the Nazis worked with the Jews/Zionists secretly to create Israel.  Yeager, with non-Jewish German sources, has better facts on the entire story.

[Christopher Marlowe]

Yeager has done much more research, and her sources sound more credible.  Yeager kind of kicked Condit's butt.  All of his points point at suspicious circumstances like, "Why did Hitler let the British go?  Hitler must have been a Rothschild agent...."  It's really specious.  

Yeager has heard of this crap before, and she sounds like she is getting crankier every time she hears it.  Condit doesn't come off as much of a scholar, mainly because he doesn't look at all the sources.  Condit seems to cherry pick his evidence, and that is not scholarly.  If someone really wants to find out what the truth is, he has to look at various sources and weigh them together. All of Condit's sources sound like propaganda crap, and all with the same viewpoint.  

Condit gets points for being more patient and good natured.  Yeager needs to take a deep breath and not take everything personally.  Holy crap.  People have been lying about Hitler for 70 years.  Another five minutes is not going to kill her.