9/11 Truck Bomb

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Here's a compilation of mainstream news clips reporting that a truck loaded with explosives was stopped at or near the George Washington Bridge.

[youtube:3som9wup]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi9rlP1_dHs[/youtube]3som9wup]

Later NYPD chief Bernard Kerik said there were no explosives in the van and that the reports were somehow false. See the last vid at the bottom of 9/11 myths pseudo debunking page:
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/A_tru ... explosives

This retraction makes no sense, other than being a cover up. A plethora of sources got word that a "truck packed with explosives" was stopped and three suspects were detained. How could all of these sources have been mistaken about "tons of explosives"? How do you confuse "tons of explosives" with something harmless? And why was the truck stopped in the first place if there was nothing suspicious going on with it and there were no explosives in it? The most likely scenario is that the truck bomb was indeed real but when the NYPD found out the suspects were not Arabs, but Israeli nationals, they quickly revised their story to drop the explosives part and play down the incident. The fact that this incident is not mentioned in any official reports and essentially disappeared from the media the day after it was reported is proof enough that the government is lying and covering up for an attempted Israeli terrorist bomb.

Also, we have the mysterious phone call to the NYPD trying to implicate "Palestinians", and "Arabs" dressed in "Shiek Uniform" as responsible for the van with explosives. Further proof the truck bomb was real and was a mini-false flag in the works by Mossad.

Go to 1:29 of this video you can actually hear the real Mossad call trying to frame Palestinians:
[googlevid:3som9wup]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4874421830690006054[/googlevid:3som9wup]

This page does a pretty good job proving this "retraction" by the NYPD was a cover up:
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/20 ... ll-of.html

Any thoughts?

[joeblow]

After all these years, I feel like that all these facts are incredibly "obvious" which causes me to assume that everyone else in world knows about them too. Of course, I am very mistaken and we should share them, because, even here at TiU, there might be people who do not know about them.

Good thread.  :up:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

The King Street mural van is probably the most bizarre incident of the day. A van painted up with a picture of the 9/11 attacks on it. The police recording about the mural van mentioned a "remote-controlled plane packed with explosives." There must have been something in the mural that led the officer to believe it was a "remote controlled plane, packed with explosives." Maybe like a joy-stick and fuse sticking out of the window or something. Why else would he say the plane was "remote controlled"?

@ 1:53 of this vid
[youtube:hc3ulyjd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bwrYveeF1Y[/youtube]hc3ulyjd]

@ 3:52 "It's a, it's a, it's a big truck with a mural painted of a, of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding. We don't know what's in the truck... the truck is in between 6th and 7th on King Street."

This recording also indicates that two men got out of the truck, and that they tried to run away and then the truck actually exploded.

@ 4:48 , "We have both suspects under Kay... We have the suspects who driv, who drove in the van, the van exploded, we have both of them under kay let's get some help over here."

Pg. 28 of this U.S. government report confirmed the existence of the mural van. Although it attempted to whitewash the incident by saying the truck was an "innocent delivery truck" (even though it had a painting of 9/11 on it lol) and it scrubbed out the part about the subsequent explosion of the van, as the NYPD recording confirms.


Here's the full image: http://oi55.tinypic.com/zvtm4l.jpg

[kolnidre]

I don't trust the admitted Judeo Freemason, Elinoff, but the primary footage included from the 1:29:00 point on is very well compiled and supremely damning. The term "Ethnic Middle Eastern people" would never be used to describe Egyptians or Saudis; only Israeli Jews. If they did not speak English how'd they rent a truck? And if it was rented, how did they place or paint a mural on it? This is seriously wacky stuff.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

I don't trust the admitted Judeo Freemason, Elinoff, but the primary footage included from the 1:29:00 point on is very well compiled and supremely damning.

Thanks for the correction. The relevant clip is at 1:29:00 of that vid I posted in the OP, not 1:29. And agreed, Elinoff is at the very least a limited hangout, possibly a Zionist shill. He attacked Michael Collins Piper's "Final Judgement" JFK book and 9/11 Missing Links, calling them both "anti-semitic". Can't get any more Jew-shill than that.

The term "Ethnic Middle Eastern people" would never be used to describe Egyptians or Saudis; only Israeli Jews.

Agreed. The fact that their country of origin was concealed is proof enough that these "middle easterners" were Israelis. If they were Saudis, Egyptians, Palestinians or any other Arab, their names and faces would have been all over the TV and this incident would have added loads of credibility to the Jewish media's "Arab Al Qaeda" Conspiracy theory, and milked it for all that it was worth. The fact that the mainstream media ignored this incident IS proof that it was an Israeli van.

If they did not speak English how'd they rent a truck? And if it was rented, how did they place or paint a mural on it? This is seriously wacky stuff.

It's a wacky incident indeed. My take is that the Israelis were using this outrageous mural van as a diversion to draw authorities in, thus giving time to their Mossad cohorts trying to blow up the George Washignton Bridge and blame it on Palestinians. Also, besides that, this might have just been an arrogant "in your face" display, sort of saying that they can pull off 9/11 and get away with it. Israeli leaders were openly euphoric when 9/11 happened and said public things about 9/11 being good for Israel, etc. They know the American media won't report it because it's in their hands. They can do/say anything they want. The public only gets to see/hear whatever the Jews want us to see/hear, and they know that. That's why they do such brazen and seemingly "sloppy" things like paint up a van with a pic of 9/11 on it, on 9/11. That's why the five dancing Israelis were publically celebrating unconcerned about getting seen by witnesses or getting arrested. They knew they would be relesed anyhow. It's almost like they wanted us to know they did it. Larry Silverstein's "pull it" reference on national TV was another one of these arrogant "suck on it Goyim" displays, IMHO.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

The same thing happened with the attempted Mossad false-flag attack in Mexico City in October of 2001. CNN briefly reported the incident where two Israelis were arrested trying to blow up the Mexican congress, but withheld the ethnicity of the suspects. Then when it came out in the Mexican press that the terrorists were Israelis, nothing was ever heard of the incident ever again.

http://www.aztlan.net/mexmossad.htm

Israelis were caught with another van-bomb in Oak Harbour, Washington, in 2002. The Jewish media didn't make a big deal of that story either. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,52681,00.html



The fact that the mainstream media completely ignores any and ALL incidents of Jewish-Israeli terrorism is proof enough the mainstream media is controlled by Jews, without even having to look at the owners of the networks, and major newspapers. Media propaganda is the main tool of false-flag terrorism. Without a complicit media, Israeli false-flag terrorism would be impossible. Look how much stuff comes out about it even with their near-total ownership of world media. Pertinent information damaging to the Jewish crime network does slip through the cracks, from time to time. Just gotta have a watchful eye.

[Whaler]

I don't trust the admitted Judeo Freemason, Elinoff, but the primary footage included from the 1:29:00 point on is very well compiled and supremely damning.

It's a wacky incident indeed. My take is that the Israelis were using this outrageous mural van as a diversion to draw authorities in, thus giving time to their Mossad cohorts trying to blow up the George Washignton Bridge and blame it on Palestinians. Also, besides that, this might have just been an arrogant "in your face" display, sort of saying that they can pull off 9/11 and get away with it. Israeli leaders were openly euphoric when 9/11 happened and said public things about 9/11 being good for Israel, etc. They know the American media won't report it because it's in their hands. They can do/say anything they want. The public only gets to see/hear whatever the Jews want us to see/hear, and they know that. That's why they do such brazen and seemingly "sloppy" things like paint up a van with a pic of 9/11 on it, on 9/11. That's why the five dancing Israelis were publically celebrating unconcerned about getting seen by witnesses or getting arrested. They knew they would be relesed anyhow. It's almost like they wanted us to know they did it. Larry Silverstein's "pull it" reference on national TV was another one of these arrogant "suck on it Goyim" displays, IMHO.

Yeah, I agree.

 They have to add these things because they are psychopathic and enjoy the act of deceiving. They like the theater of it. They set it up like a Die Hard movie plot. You would think that only bad guy villains in cheesy Hollywood Blockbusters would paint murals of Passenger jets crashing into the wtc...so Jewey.