Letter from SSPX Superior General Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

UPDATED, PLEASE READ

I've received the following notice from Bp. Williamson:

Dear Maurice Pinay,

Please publish on the same blog on which you published the Sept 23 letter of Bishop Fellay to me, the following message --

The September 23 letter from Bishop Fellay to me, as posted on the Maurice Pinay blog, is authentic, but it was put on the Internet without my knowledge and without my permission. I sent a copy to friends to ask their advice or to tell them why I was not present at the Albano meeting, but never did I want that copy to appear in public. I have no idea who posted it, nor do I ask who did so.

Bishop Richard Williamson, London, 14 Oct. 2011

Letter from Bishop Fellay to Bishop Williamson

23 September, 2011

Your Excellency,

I would be happy to invite you to the SSPX Superiors' meeting to be held in Albano early in October, as the nature and composition of the meeting has been somewhat changed because of current events. I would also be happy to send you a text from Rome to which they want a reply. However, I find myself obliged to attach conditions to each of these points.

Firstly, as to the text, I ask of you an oath in writing that you will communicate to nobody either the text or its content. Too often in the past you have lacked discretion, so I am obliged to submit you to a procedure of this kind, which I am not happy to have to do.

Secondly, as to the meeting in Albano, I can only invite you to attend insofar as you stop publishing Eleison Comments. You have already been given the reason several times, as you have been given the order to stop. You considered that for the sake of the preaching and defence of the Faith you needed pay no attention, on the pretext that nobody had the right to stop a bishop from fulfilling his duty to preach and defend the Faith. But such preaching and defence of the Faith are inserted in concrete circumstances which may well call for superiors to intervene. Besides, no other bishop of the SSPX publishes a circular letter and considers himself thereby hindered from expressing himself.

Moreover the consequences of your attitude are harmful to the SSPX: you ooze distrust towards SSPX headquarters and the Superior General. You cannot help yourself communicating this feeling to those around you. No revolution could do a better job of undermining authority... and this you do in the name of a supposed possible betrayal on the part of the Superior General... That is very serious.

Especially when a certain number of indications show that your action is not confined to theory:

1 To an Argentinian priest from the Novus Ordo who asks for your advice, you recommend that he should not join the SSPX.

2 To an American layman you write that the apostasy of the mainstream Church is farther advanced than that of the SSPX. How can you write such things, false and unjust, against the Society of which you are still a member?

3 There exists in Anglo-saxon circles a network of infiltrators of the SSPX preparing a break-away. You are put forward as the head of this movement, you are the friend of its leaders and you are playing their game.

And you talk to us of being double tongued! As for the unity of the SSPX, the one most putting it in danger is yourself, your Excellency! Always in the name of defense of the Faith. In such a grave moment as the confrontation now taking place between ourselves and the Holy See, the outcome of which will be decisive for our own future and not without consequences for the entire Church, I ask you then, once more, to remain silent until further orders. If you were to refuse to heed this directive, it would mean both your not being invited to the Albano meeting and the starting of the canonical procedure leading to exclusion from the SSPX. So I await your reply.

All of this is most sad, and it has nothing to do with the confrontation just mentioned, whatever you may think. The loss of one of its bishops is one of the worst things that could happen to the SSPX. It depends entirely on you to spare it such a misfortune. Do believe, your Excellency, in my fervent prayers to the Sacred Heart of Jesus,
BpF.

Source: http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/1 ... ishop.html

Brave Catholic Bishop exposes the Holohoax

[youtube:suo9lku4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx_zqPxIKgU[/youtube]suo9lku4]

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Well said!  Indeed a Brave man... on the mark!

[Ognir]

His newsletter ended about a month ago

[Christopher Marlowe]

His newsletter ended about a month ago

I still get it. Last issue 3 days ago.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Thursday, October 20, 2011
Bishop Williamson Contra Mundum



On Oct. 19 we reported that the Conference of European Rabbis and the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith had ordered Pope Benedict XVI to drop negotiations with the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) until such time as they reeducate or silence their Bishop Richard N. Williamson.

In his Eleison Comments column last week, Williamson repeated 1965 years of Catholic teaching about the responsibility for the death of Jesus Christ. He reasoned ably, citing the fact that Pontius Pilate would have never ordered Christ's crucifixion had it not been for the demands of the majority of the Jews of Palestine.

Collective Guilt is Talmudic

We would not have published Bishop Williamson's column had he not referred to "noble exceptions" among the Jews who did not have a hand in Christ's death. In our own writing we have always emphasized that the notion of collective racial guilt, such as the Allied World War II doctrine that every German man, woman and child was collectively guilty of Nazi crimes and deserved death, is a reflection of a rabbinic mentality. The same collective guilt attitude is at work in the Israeli state where all Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank are seen as bearing responsibility for the crimes of Hamas and deserving of death; or for example, all prisoners released by the Israelis in return for Gilad Shalit are terrorists and criminals; none of them innocent of the charges made against them. All of this is Talmudic.

Therefore, when people stoop to draw parallels between today's Judaics and those who demanded their Messiah's execution 2000 years ago, declaring these 21st century Judaics collectively guilty, we err grievously on the side of the Talmudic mentality and become, in a spiritual sense, rabbis ourselves.

It must be understood that rabbinic agents are in our midst. Here is a counter-intelligence secret: the rabbis wish to sow in all movements that contest Judaism and the Talmud a collective disparagement toward all Judaics without exception, leaving them nowhere to turn among gentiles and Christians for safe haven or liberation. Consequently, they step backward into the waiting arms of their rabbinic oppressors.

Contemporary Judaics only share in the responsibility for Christ's death spiritually and ideologically if they are adherents of Judaism or a hyper-chauvinist Zionism with a strong ethnic, tribal component. A poor schmuck who was born a "Jew" (more likely a Khazar but I will not stress the point here), is not at fault for the circumstance of his birth. In the 1920s many German-Judaics wanted freedom from the rabbis. They were admirers of Bach and Beethoven, German science and literature. They had served patriotically in the Great War. They sought to progress beyond the ghetto. They desired to share in the freedom of Western Civilization. Instead, they were collectively rebuffed and told that they possessed ineradicable genetic tendencies toward subversion and degeneracy. This is the rabbinic doctrine about gentiles and it was projected, through an occult mirror, by the German nationalist leadership of the 1920, 30s and 40s onto Judaics.

Noble Exceptions Among "the Jews"

Bishop Williamson's column eschewed that self-destructive rut by citing "noble exceptions" among the Judaics, and fingering, not their supposed attachment to the "old covenant" (the uninformed mistake Judaism for Karaitism), but to the Talmud, which nullifies from the Mishnah onward, the Old Testament. Without these two precise distinctions which the bishop made, we could not have circulated his column.

Hence, the writing at issue was free of racism, indicted the correct source of rabbinic perversion (Talmud) and otherwise repeated foundational truths that the spiritual heirs of the Pharisees in our midst today can no more bear to read than their ideological ancestors could bear to hear from the lips of Jesus Himself.

This is a very old war of ideas. Because the allies of the rabbis have massive clout with the media of the West it was decided,  in the early 60s, that the papacy would seek accommodation ("aggiornamento") with the modern world, and bend the entire mission of the Church away from proclaiming the radical truth of the Gospel toward avoiding giving offense to those who can't endure its truth.

Due to that momentous alteration, we now find ourselves on the stage of an absurdist theatre where Benedict XVI is ordered by the spiritual sons of the Pharisees to punish the bishop and his priestly SSPX fraternity for daring to say in public what St. Matthew, St. Paul and the Fathers of the early church taught and proclaimed concerning who was responsible for the crucifixion of Christ.

This is an extraordinary state of affairs because it puts all authentic Christians under an obligation: to be considered good goyim free of the antisemitism libel, we must agree to shout that the emperor has no clothes. Or we can choose to dare to speak truth to power in the face of the rabbinic chutzpah which presumes to censor the speech of the Church of Jesus Christ by ordering us to affirm a lie.

Decades ago the Church of Rome did just that with the document Nostra Aetate ("In Our Time"), contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Israel's Messiah.

Auschwitz Over Calvary

Every once in a while, even in our degenerate days, a churchman of Williamson's mettle arises and proclaims the truth irregardless of the pressure, and pays a terrible price for it, in earthly terms anyway. The propaganda system being what it is, he can't be allowed to do so purely; the waters must be muddied and the truth-teller defamed. Mixed into reports of Bishop Williamson proclaiming the Biblical truth about the deicide were media allusions to his "conviction" in a German court for "denying the Holocaust."

By this label we are made to think, Ah, he's a convicted criminal; a shady character, a felon. There is always considerable shame attached to those who contest the Talmudic imperium. The Son of God was stripped nearly naked and made to appear as a felon deserving of death. No true follower of His can expect anything less.

In Germany defense attorneys can be jailed for offering too vigorous a defense of their World War II revisionist clients, and judges sanctioned for failing to convict a revisionist defendant. The western media doesn't report this because it would impugn the verdict issued by the German-Zionist kangaroo court (forgive my candor but this is a precise description of the "justice" dispensed by that judiciary).

Bishop Williamson never "denied the Holocaust." He did undertake a very human and Biblical act -- he doubted a Judaic fable (Titus 1:14), that six million Judaic persons died and many of them perished in "gas chambers" in Auschwitz.

Odd, is it not, that anyone in Germany may doubt the Resurrection of Christ and the Virgin Birth or even the every existence of Jesus, with complete freedom and no fear of prosecution? Yet to doubt the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz is a crime punishable by five years' imprisonment. Pope John Paul II called Auschwitz the new Golgotha and this writer has for decades argued that Auschwitz has replaced Calvary as the central and defining pole star in the western ontology of sacred suffering. Would it not be safe to say that the evidence for this revolutionary reversal can be found in the criminal penalties attached to so-called "holocaust denial" and the freedom by which "Resurrection denial" and even denial that Jesus ever existed, are promoted throughout the media, academia and the Internet?

Oh, but it is not very prudent or politic for Williamson to take on both the deicide and the gas chambers. Not at this time. He is a hand grenade! Uranium! He destroys the hermeneutic of continuity, the negotiations of the Vatican diplomatic corps, the delicate, behind-the-scenes arrangements.

And to this we say, hallelujuah! Fresh air at last. The truth at last, at whatever cost to reputation or bank account. If we had a dozen Richard Williamsons in high places we would convert Judaics and cause the rabbinic liars and masonic ADLers to back into their shuls and confine their prevarications to  the precincts of their eruv.

Modernist Catholicism Constitutes Jew Hate

But the reverse prevails for the present time and Jew-haters infest the Vatican.

Say what? Yes, Jew haters: this pope, the last three, and those who persecute Bishop Williamson, Jew haters all. Jesus Christ loved His people and that is why he retailed to them difficult truths. The demonic spirit of the modern age declares that if we love the "Jew" we will encourage him in his sins and mendacity. What is asked of loved ones: introspection, examination of conscience and self-reflection, is denied to the Judaics out of deference to their engorged egos. This is hatred.

We bow to them and thereby encourage their pride and chutzpah, intransigence, racism, and religion of lies. We sentence their women to the pathological and destructive "family purity" (sic) laws of Chazal, the halachos of niddah, with all the suffering and oppression of women which that insanity entails. We sentence their men to absolute obedience to the rabbis and thousands of rules that daily micro-manage their lives, along with the burden of institutionalized contempt for goyim and Christians.

Pope Benedict XVI requires nothing of "Jews" in the Name of Christ. No repudiation of rabbinic racism or violence. No apology for Kol Nidrei or Birkat HaMinim, just more appeasement of their megalomania. Here is the operation of occult Jew hate, so long concealed since the Renaissance and now in the open. There is more love for Judaic people in one line of a radical call to repentance and conversion from Bishop Williamson than in all the lucubrations of the Nostra Aetate Church of Rome.

Rabbinic and Zionist bigots and their Vatican enablers will go wild in the days and weeks ahead, as they always do in the face of a truth that scalds their souls. They will do their best to gibbet Bishop Williamson from the highest pole of their unending vengeance.

Where stand you in this great battle?
Copyright©2011

Hoffman is the author of Judaism's Strange Gods, forthcoming at the end of November from Independent History and Research.

Source: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2 ... undum.html

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Pope called on to condemn bishop's new anti-Semitic slur
October 19, 2011
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/10 ... ic-remarks


Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt

BERLIN (Jewish Telegraph Agency) -- A group of European rabbis has called on the pope to condemn the latest anti-Semitic remarks by a Holocaust-denying Catholic bishop.

The Brussels-based Conference of European Rabbis slammed comments by Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson in which he allegedly blamed Jews for deicide. Williamson, a member of the radical Catholic Pius Brotherhood sect, reportedly made the comments in the latest issue of his newsletter, "The Eleison Comments." He has  been living in London.

"Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics," conference President Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of Moscow said in a statement issued Wednesday.

Goldschmidt called for the Church to "suspend negotiations with extremist Catholic tendencies until it is clear that these groups show a clear commitment to tackling anti-Semitism within their ranks."

In his newsletter, Williamson wrote that "only the Jews were the primary agents of the deicide because Pontius Pilate would never have condemned Jesus if the Jews had not asked for blood."

Williamson was found guilty of Holocaust denial in Germany in 2010 and fined about $14,000. He has previously denied the existence of gas chambers and the murder of 6 million Jews during the Holocaust.

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication against Williamson, but the Vatican also reportedly declared that "in order to be admitted to episcopal functions within the Church, (he) will have to take his distance, in an absolutely unequivocal and public fashion, from his position on the Shoah, which the Holy Father was not aware of when the excommunication was lifted."

During meetings with Pope Benedict in Berlin last month, German Jewish leader Dieter Graumann said that one of the issues that troubled Jewish-Catholic relations was the Church's refusal to condemn Williamson.

In his statement Wednesday, Goldschmidt said the pope "has shown a commitment to fostering a spirit of positive dialogue with Jews both before and during his papacy. But he must clearly show that there is no room in the Catholic Church for purveyors of hate."

________

Bishop Williamson's website:
http://www.dinoscopus.org

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

World Jewish Congress urges Rome to sideline opponents of Catholic-Jewish reconciliation

24 October 2011

Ahead of the interfaith meeting later this week in Assisi, Italy – hosted by Pope Benedict XVI and to be attended by 300 religious leaders from around the Globe – the World Jewish Congress (WJC) has urged the Vatican to forcefully oppose attempts to blame Jews collectively for the death of Jesus. Deputy Secretary-General Maram Stern, the WJC official in charge of inter-religious dialogue (pictured right at a meeting with the pope in 2010), said: "Last week, Catholics were treated to another despicable tractate by Bishop Richard Williamson whose point was to derail Catholic-Jewish reconciliation and to revive age-old anti-Semitic canards such as that of Jewish deicide. This was a timely reminder that there are still many clerics out there who vehemently oppose and actively undermine dialogue and reconciliation between Catholics and Jews."

"Unfortunately, some Catholic splinter groups such as Williamson's Society of St. Pius X continue to defend and propagate medieval anti-Jewish teachings. It is therefore important not to jeopardize the enormous achievements made in Catholic-Jewish dialogue over the past decades by allowing preachers of hate in again through the back door. Certainly, notorious anti-Semites such as Bishop Williamson must not be granted a place in the Catholic Church," Stern declared.

Last week, Williamson – who in 2009 publicly denied the existence of gas chambers in Nazi death camps and was convicted by a German court earlier this year of Holocaust denial – wrote on his web blog: "Only the Jews (leaders and people) were the prime agents of the deicide" [of Jesus Christ], and not Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate. Williamson also alleged "a continuity amongst Jews down the centuries", indirectly blaming today's Jews for Jesus' death.

Maram Stern, who will represent the World Jewish Congress at the Assisi gathering, said Jews around the world valued that Pope Benedict XVI, like his predecessor John Paul II, "is sincerely committed to strengthening inter-faith dialogue." Stern urged the Pope to reiterate statements he made earlier this year in his book on Jesus and turn them into an article of faith of the Church.

http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/n ... nciliation

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Pope Foxman "Deeply Disturbed"

The Kvetching Pope, Abe Foxman has issued another of his kvetching edicts, this one titled, "ADL Deeply Disturbed by Archbishop's Remarks Likening Politicians in Trinidad and Tobago to Jews":
... Port of Spain Archbishop Edward Gilbert was reported to have [likened Trinidad and Tobago politicians to Jews] during a Jubilee Mass held October 24 at Our Lady of Perpetual Help Roman Catholic Church in San Fernando to celebrate the 225th anniversary of the Roman Catholic mission there.

"The Jews were compassionate and caring for their own, they were compassionate and caring to the people of their nation, to the people of their race, to the people of their ethnic communities. However, that wasn't enough for Jesus. Jesus took that teaching and universalized it," Archbishop Gilbert told his congregation, according to a news report. "In many cases in this country, there are people who love one another, who are compassionate, but they have the mindset of the original Jewish people. They are good to their own ... but they have not universalized the concept of love."

Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, said the archbishop's statements as reported were "a disturbing repackaging of ancient anti-Jewish canards and supersessionist beliefs."

"Archbishop Gilbert devalues Judaism over and against Christianity," said Mr. Foxman. "The false notion that Jews only care about themselves and don't care enough about others is one of the major pillars of classical anti-Semitism."

"While the Catholic Church has made tremendous strides in countering anti-Jewish notions such as the belief that the advent of Christianity superseded Judaism, Archbishop Gilbert's statements show that he has not internalized the important reforms of Vatican II."

http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASInt_13/6145_13.htm
I agree that Pope Foxman is deeply disturbed and I would be happy to illustrate one of the many reasons why.

Above we see Pope Foxman in his edict to the Goyim proclaim that it's a damnable "major pillar of classical anti-Semitism" to recognize the fact that Judaism is not a universal religion but a tribal religion which teaches its adherents to favor the tribe over outsiders.

But over here, in Foxman's inter-office memo to the tribe not meant for Goy eyes to see, Foxman admonishes the tribe to not love universally because to do so is "Judaism lite" which "brushes past the theological significance of acting on behalf of Jews."

"What I've been critical of is those who have sold Judaism as, 'All you have to do is love universally and that's Judaism,' " Foxman said. "It's not—it's ersatz Judaism. It's Judaism lite." It also, Foxman added pointedly, has the potential to elevate political action on behalf of others while brushing past the theological significance of acting on behalf of Jews.

Tikkun Olam is a Tribal, not Universal, Concept
Evidently, Pope Foxman is deeply disturbed because he wants to enforce his tribal racket while defining it a damnable heresy for any outsider to recognize that fact. To paraphrase St. Augustine, by doing so, his madness, not innocence, is manifest.

I have often marveled at the word-magic I've read in pseudo-scholarly post-graduate volumes as they circle around the white elephant of Judaic tribalism (euphemized as "particularism") for hundreds of pages dedicated to mesmerizing the reader into the false belief that Judaism is a universal, progressive, enlightened religion.

The deeply disturbing part of it is the deception and browbeating of observers into not acknowledging what is plain before their eyes--that Judaism is the most un-universal religion in existence, if not in history. Every sane person knows it. Everyone who has lived among followers of the rabbis has experienced it. There are individual exceptions among "Jews," but as Foxman says in his inter-office memo, they are not really living according to true Judaism.

That this even has to be decoded is a testament to the state of degradation we've descended to. Of course Judaism is tribal; the word plainly means tribe-of-Judah-ism. It's about sustaining the tribe of counterfeit Judah at all costs. It's not about loving and serving God; loving ones non-Judaic neighbor as oneself or any such universal value.

Pray for Pope Foxman that God will relieve him of his deeply disturbed state and that he will cease his attempts to inculcate the same in us. Until he is miraculously healed, tell your friends, family and clergy to ignore the disturbed ravings of the self-chosen Pope Foxman.

Source: http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/1 ... urbed.html