AIDS Fraud? Nacey Banks

[Anonymous]

I was hoping there was a way to put a poll on this site as I would like to know what peoples opinion is of AIDS here.

I am suspecting that Nacey Banks is a quack, I have not read her books but I have listened to some audio programs of her and DBS. She was the first black woman to graduate from Harvard (finance?)(nothing good comes from there as we know), I do suspect she was a PC affirmative action shoe in and perhaps acting as the controlled opposition to the AIDS story. Her theory of AIDS is it not caused by a virus, but is caused by immune system overload from a combination of drug use and pathogen intake often caused by homosexual activity being in contact with other peoples feces. She mentioned the first cases were caused by homosexual men in San Fransisco as they use some popular type of upper which they sniffed which she believes is also an immune suppressant and hence both of these things together causes a chronic case of immune system disorder identified as AIDS.

She says the reason she started researching AIDS is that she could not understand why black women were getting aids at a much higher rate than white women

I am also very unsure about the entire vaccine disinformation as well, I do believe they are useful, farmers routinely immunize all their livestock which is expensive, if it had no use at all, nobody would be doing it as I have checked on farming forums and anyone big always immunizes them. I think the problem with them is giving them to children who are too young such as newborns and also the mercury likely a issue as well. (I have heard there is less mercury in the vaccines than in an average serving size of tuna)

I was looking at this video and I assume it is in her book, she says the mining companies in South Africa are Anglo American companies and the blacks who were working in those mines did not get their cases heard in court for health problems until the ANC took over SA. I have never heard her talk anything against jews before. Also in that video she says that AIDS is not real yet the last thing she says to the people there is 'if you get AIDS, it is potentially reversible'.

I have looked at some AIDS forums, this BS does not fly there and as I am aware of, nobody has recovered once AIDS begins, why doesn't Nancey or DBS get someone on their show who was diagnosed HIV positive and began to develop AIDS but then cured themselves (assumingly perhaps by not taking the AIDS medication which they claim in africa causes AIDS), I guess it is because there is nobody around who has. There have been plenty of fags before the 1980's who did drugs & bum sex but never developed any kind of AIDS symptoms.

Looking at her work she just looks like a fraud to me.

So what are your opinions of her and this AIDS thing?

[pas]

Bluejelly wrote:

farmers routinely immunize all their livestock which is expensive, if it had no use at all, nobody would be doing it as I have checked on farming forums and anyone big always immunizes them

They do that so the animals will survive in an unhealthy situation where they are packed to the maximum.It's all for the profits.
In a small town near me there was one of the last farmers who didn't vaccinated his cows and the milk they produced contained the highest in nutrients of all the Dutch milk tested.I am very distrusting toward the jew pharmaceuticals.

So what are your opinions of her and this AIDS thing?

I think she definately speaks a lot of truth and her theory about AIDS makes sense to me.

[Anonymous]

Thanks pas, the African group she was talking to, she pretty much just said all the things that were being done to them were by Europeans, so she is a race hustler in my opinion. Your comment about non vaccinated farm animals having higher nutrient content has nothing to do with vaccinations, it likely has to do with the animals being allowed to be out on pasture and in a more natural environment instead of being in stalls and in filthy conditions which they also would require antibiotic medications as well. I don't see any reason why vaccines by themselves would lower nutrient quantity.

[pas]

Bluejelly wrote:

she pretty much just said all the things that were being done to them were by Europeans, so she is a race hustler in my opinion

Yeah, i agree that she should have exposed the root of the problem: the jew.Especially towards a non jew-wise audience.Any other label is a dishonest and more over, inaccurate.I also am of the opinion it should be mandatory to name the jews when one adresses slavery (any kind).
But i still think she does great work and i see no evidence of her being a quack.

I don't see any reason why vaccines by themselves would lower nutrient quantity

They contain chemicals wich could partially end up in the milk effecting the nutricial value, would be my guess.I can't back this theory up at the moment, though.That aside, i'd prefer all my foods as natural as possible: no vaccins, medications, hormones, chemical fertilizers, insecticides etc.(wich is quite dificult or impossible and very expensive especially now that my garden is empty :down: )

Btw. her first name is Nancy.