Jewish Policy

[Anonymous]

J.B. Campbell tellin' it like it is. Gotta love how this guy doesn't hold back.

ZS



http://www.jbcampbellextremismonline.co ... icy/1.html


Jewish Policy  


We need a new Jewish policy because the Jews are taking us to war once again.  

This is nothing new.  The Jews took us to war in 1917.  Chaim Weizmann and his cronies in America (Frankfurter, Brandeis, Baruch and Untermayer) blackmailed Woodrow Wilson into a declaration of war against Germany and almost got us into their League of Nations.  Over ten million people died.

Those same Jews along with Jacob Schiff used the American president to wage total war on the Russian people by sending Trotsky-Bronstein to St. Petersburg to join forces with Lenin-Ulyanov to destroy Russia.  Scores of millions of people died.  

FDR and his Jews (Frankfurter, Baruch, Untermayer, Rosenman and Morgenthau) maneuvered us into World War II and into their United Nations, after sixty million people died.  Truman's Jews (Feinberg, Jacobson and Blaustein) persuaded him to create a Jewish war state and declare a UN war against Korea, where we now learn that millions of Koreans died.  

It continued downhill from there.  Johnson and his Jews (Feinberg, Krim, Goldberg, Fortas, the Rostows and many others) took us to war in Vietnam, with millions killed.  They also opened the Treasury Department and the US arsenal to Israel.  Our last few presidents have been taken over by Jews who call themselves Neo-Cons and have put us at war with Islam, with millions killed and still being killed and many more to be killed.

Behind every American war is a bunch of Jews profiting in some big way.  War is good for the Jews because it gets millions of people killed and Jewish banks make big war loans to the government.  The loans can never be repaid and this puts the government even further under Jewish control.  Judaism is a cult of death and profit, the proper order difficult to say.

The Jews have us at war with Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya with more coming against Yemen, Syria and of course, Iran, their ultimate Moslem target because that's where so much more oil is.  

Now the Jews are outdoing themselves with a new bill in the Congress that would outlaw US government contact with Iran!  The bill, HR 1905, introduced by a Florida Jewess, would require Jewish permission for any American from the president down to make contact with the Iranian government.  

"The clearest evidence that war is the intention of the bill's supporters comes in Section 601:

(c) RESTRICTION ON CONTACT - No person employed with the United States Government may contact in an official or unofficial capacity any person that -
(1) is an agent, instrumentality, or official of, is affiliated with, or is serving as a representative of the Government of Iran; and

(2) presents a threat to the United States or is affiliated with terrorist organizations.

(d) WAIVER - The president may waive the requirements of subsection (c) if the president determines and so reports to the appropriate congressional committees 15 days prior to the exercise of waiver authority that failure to exercise such waiver authority would pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States."  (Al Jazeera, MJ Rosenberg)


Can you believe it?  If the Jews can't actually force us to attack Iran, which the military doesn't want to do, they can rub our noses in their power by forbidding us to speak without permission!

We need a new Jewish policy.  Here is mine:  Save America – Kill the Jews.

Alll Jews?  Only the ones who do harm.  I can't say how many of those there are, since Jews are by nature harmful.  But Bobby Fischer had it right:  Hundreds of thousands of harmful Jews must be killed.  What I call the rabbinical class must be wiped out.  The rabbis are the commissars who keep the little Jews in line.  Maybe some of these Jews would like to break free and be harmless.

Banking Jews, advisor Jews, entertainment Jews, education Jews, medicine Jews, lawyer Jews, judge Jews, policy Jews, journalist Jews, religion Jews, government Jews, publisher Jews, news Jews.  These are the harmful ones, the ones in control of every aspect of our lives.  

During the war between the Germans and the Soviets, the Red Army was controlled by Jewish commissars whose jobs were to shoot soldiers from behind if they didn't show enough zeal against the Germans.  It is of course a sad commentary that Russians armed with rifles and submachine guns didn't turn around and slaughter those treacherous vermin.  Why didn't they?  Probably for the same reason that we Americans have not yet wiped out our Jewish controllers.  What is the common factor between us and the Russians that has protected the Jews?  The factor is Christianity.

The Russians were neutralized by a combination of Jewish terror and Jewish Christianity.  The faithful are instructed to submit and await salvation in the sweet bye-and-bye, meaning not in this life.  Self-defense is not in the Christian instruction manual.  Jesus forbade self-defense when attacked in the garden of Gethsemane.  Jesus ruled out survival during his interview by Pilate.  What the hell was he thinking, if we can credit the legend?

I will say it over and over:  Christianity does not have a program for victory over the Jews, despite its alleged opposition to Judaism, despite its main character's Jewish-directed execution and those of his early followers all of whom were Jewish rebels.  No, it glories in the symbol of Jesus' execution, the cross!  How insane is that?  The cross represents the ultimate Jewish victory over their enemies, the Christians.  The cross represents the death penalty for believing in Jesus.  It represents surrender to the Jews.  That is why I consider Christianity to be our deadliest enemy, deadlier than the Jews themselves.  

Christianity represents surrender to any potential killer such as Stalin, Mao or some uniformed dope at a roadblock.  Christianity is what holds us in check when our instinct is to defend ourselves with deadly force.  The damage done to humanity by Christianity is difficult to gauge, considering also the mass murdering of humanity by Christianity itself, back in its gory glory days.  An estimated four million women were burned, hanged or drowned by Catholic priests who accused them of being witches.  Protestant witch-doctors did the same thing in Massachusetts and Connecticut right up to the 18th Century.

The great gory glory days of the faith were those when the Christian crusaders invaded the Middle East for a hundred and ninety years and killed and were killed, the death toll maybe five million.  For what?  Peace and love?  No, to put Jerusalem under Christian rule.

To eliminate the cancer of Judaism we must eradicate the cancer of the intellect which is Christianity, which is merely Judaism for Gentiles.  How can a Christian resist one of "God's chosen people" bent on destroying him/her?  How can "God's chosen people" hate the "son of God?"  Christians don't ask themselves these obvious questions.

Christianity is a mass of contradictions and confusion – the perfect mind-scrambler.  Merely the belief in an invisible god is a sign of insanity.  What good did Jesus do, besides getting himself and all his people killed?  

Christians should understand the depth of deception involved in their belief system.   Jews hate Gentiles, not Christianity.  Christianity is the trap they set for good-hearted Gentiles who want to do good works.  It's also a refuge for cowards.

Christianity is how their hated enemy is disarmed and rendered safe for Jewish plundering.  Those whom the Jews destroy they first make Christian!  It is the perfect scheme for taking power because it involves mind control.  The Christian supplicant is the most harmless sheep, ready for shearing or slaughter, whichever is needed.

The first step toward de-Judaizing America is the total rejection of all religion, specifically Christianity, by those who will do the hard work against the Jews.  The Christian fundamentalist racketeers have given the Jews tremendous help for decades and must take equal responsibility and punishment as their Khazar masters.  They turned the entire Bible Belt into a Jewish zone of psychological occupation.

What must happen in America to the Jews and their helpers is the same as they did to the Russian people after 1917.  What we see the Jews doing to the helpless Moslems under their control must be done to them.  Jews slaughter humanitarians trying to help the helpless.  This is what must be done to Jews, not one of whom objected to those murders.

Judaism is a catastrophic plague on humanity.  The plague must be wiped out in totality.  

The first step is to speak the unspeakable and plant the seed of rebellion against the Jews.  That's what this is, a suggestion for a new Jewish policy.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I will say it over and over: Christianity does not have a program for victory over the Jews, despite its alleged opposition to Judaism, despite its main character's Jewish-directed execution and those of his early followers all of whom were Jewish rebels. No, it glories in the symbol of Jesus' execution, the cross! How insane is that? The cross represents the ultimate Jewish victory over their enemies, the Christians. The cross represents the death penalty for believing in Jesus. It represents surrender to the Jews. That is why I consider Christianity to be our deadliest enemy, deadlier than the Jews themselves.

Christianity represents surrender to any potential killer such as Stalin, Mao or some uniformed dope at a roadblock. Christianity is what holds us in check when our instinct is to defend ourselves with deadly force. The damage done to humanity by Christianity is difficult to gauge, considering also the mass murdering of humanity by Christianity itself, back in its gory glory days. An estimated four million women were burned, hanged or drowned by Catholic priests who accused them of being witches. Protestant witch-doctors did the same thing in Massachusetts and Connecticut right up to the 18th Century.

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.  The devil is the real enemy, the power of the Jews in society is a symptom of our fallen sinful state.  If people increased their faith in Christ, we would see Jewish power evaporate.  Where do Jews derive their power? Money, war, pornography, prostitution. If we could have the Grace to resist temptation to sin, these powers would melt away. We are ruled by money because of our greed; We are ruled by war because of our hatred and fear; we are ruled by pornography and prostitution because of our insatiable lust.

All the sin of the world perished on the cross, and Christ's Grace is freely available to those who are open to it. There is power in the cross, that is why atheistic Jews hate the cross and want it removed. To contemplate Christ on the Cross is to pray.  

This post is not really well researched: an estimated four million women burned, hanged or drowned by priests who accused them of being witches? Where did that come from? Nizkor? Total BS statistic.

I'm very suspicious of people who come onto TIU advocating violence against Jews collectively.  It makes me think that such a person is trying to create evidence for some "Hate Crime Commission" to say that TIU is a "Hate Site" that needs to be shut down.

[Anonymous]

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.  The devil is the real enemy, the power of the Jews in society is a symptom of our fallen sinful state.  If people increased their faith in Christ, we would see Jewish power evaporate.  Where do Jews derive their power? Money, war, pornography, prostitution. If we could have the Grace to resist temptation to sin, these powers would melt away. We are ruled by money because of our greed; We are ruled by war because of our hatred and fear; we are ruled by pornography and prostitution because of our insatiable lust.

All the sin of the world perished on the cross, and Christ's Grace is freely available to those who are open to it. There is power in the cross, that is why atheistic Jews hate the cross and want it removed. To contemplate Christ on the Cross is to pray.  

This post is not really well researched: an estimated four million women burned, hanged or drowned by priests who accused them of being witches? Where did that come from? Nizkor? Total BS statistic.

I'm very suspicious of people who come onto TIU advocating violence against Jews collectively.  It makes me think that such a person is trying to create evidence for some "Hate Crime Commission" to say that TIU is a "Hate Site" that needs to be shut down.

Hey Marlowe,

F**K OFF with this BULLSHIT.

ZS

[Christopher Marlowe]

Hey Marlowe,

F**K OFF with this BULLSHIT.

ZS

What are you going to do, ZS?  Let me guess....uhmm, shoot me?

First one who can spot the pattern wins the prize:

#5)
Re: Jewish lesbians Put Little Boy Through Sex Change Surgery

Postby Zionist Sniper » Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:20 pm
ya know what I think when I read stories like this ....

...... I don't own enough match grade ammo.

ZS

Zionist Sniper
    Resident Member

#4)
Re: American Ex-Marine killed by Oakland Police -- start of something?

Postby Zionist Sniper » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:06 am
Find the names of the police at these events and where they live. There are ways of dealing with these people one at a time.

Remember, their radio is their lifeline.

ZS

Zionist Sniper
    Resident Member

Jewish Policy

Post by Zionist Sniper » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:35 pm
....
We need a new Jewish policy. Here is mine: Save America – Kill the Jews.

Alll Jews? Only the ones who do harm. I can't say how many of those there are, since Jews are by nature harmful. But Bobby Fischer had it right: Hundreds of thousands of harmful Jews must be killed. What I call the rabbinical class must be wiped out. The rabbis are the commissars who keep the little Jews in line. Maybe some of these Jews would like to break free and be harmless.

Banking Jews, advisor Jews, entertainment Jews, education Jews, medicine Jews, lawyer Jews, judge Jews, policy Jews, journalist Jews, religion Jews, government Jews, publisher Jews, news Jews. These are the harmful ones, the ones in control of every aspect of our lives.

I don't really see the point in publicly proclaiming idiotic dreams of violence, except perhaps to make the blog, on which the person is posting such idiocy, the subject of a hate crimes investigation:  

(This is from WRH, who got it from Curt Maynard's blog.  But I can't sign onto Curt Maynard's blog without giving google my info so they can keep tabs on who is signing into the "hate site".)

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/racistboogie.php?q=racistboogie.php
No racist boogeyman? No problem we'll make one up.
By Curt Maynard
 
Sadly, few people are aware of the fact that International Talmudic Jewry is having a lot of problems these days getting away with the same old lies they've been perpetrating on society for hundreds of years. For alleged "anti-Semites," like myself, the idea that Jewry has been concocting stories about racism and anti-Semitism isn't anything new, in fact they fabricate the vast majority of the so-called "hate crimes" you hear about on network television. "Hate Crime" legislation has gotten so far out of hand in Britain, that British police will even unashamedly arrest children with Downs Syndrome who have been accused [an accusation is all that's necessary in Britain these days] for allegedly uttering a racial epithet while pushing another child with Downs Syndrome. If you don't think this level of ignorance will ever end up as law in the United States you simply haven't been paying attention.
 
One purveyor of fake hate crimes is a homosexual named Mark Potok, who heads of the anti-hate department at the Southern Poverty Law Center [SPLC]. In respect to hate crimes, Potok stated the following:
 
"A person who is a victim of a hate crime can probably expect to get almost universal sympathy on a college campus. Out in the world at large, that's not necessarily true."
 
Potok continues to do everything he can to change this. Recently the SPLC has been forced to admit that they invent Ku Klux Klan Klaverns [units]. How do they do this?
 
"In fact, simply having one person - or even a post office box - in a town affiliated with a hate group is enough to have a town listed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's 'Hate Map."
 
A group is defined by Merriam-Webster's dictionary as follows:
"two or more figures forming a complete unit in a composition."
So it seems that the SPLC has its own special definition for the word "group," because they've admitted to the fact that they'll include towns with a single individual posting information on the net that International Jewry doesn't want you to see.
 
In other words, if the SPLC knows that there is a blogger in Bugtussle Nebraska that writes articles critical of Jews, they'll put Bugtussle Nebraska on their hate map," and label it as the home of some KKK or Nazi organization. Ah, come one Curt, they really don't do this do they? Oh yes they do, and I'll provide the reader with another example other than those listed by Benjamin Yelle in his recent article KKK Branch no longer in town."
 
I lived in Lake Jackson Texas some time ago, I was committed to an employment contract and had to stay there for a year. At the time I was working closely with a friend and his blog the Politically Correct Apostate, which has been subsequently and quite effectively shut down by Google who also happens to own Blogger.com the PC Apostate's host. Both companies are owned and under the strict censorship of ethnic Jews, but that's a different story. In any case, while in Lake Jackson Texas I opened a post office box and posted it on the Politically Correct Apostate. Not long after doing that I noticed that the SPLC had listed Lake Jackson Texas as the home of a Klavern called the "Brotherhood of Klans Knights of the Ku Klux Klan." I knew at the time they did this that they were lying but not until a few days ago did I have any corroborating evidence I needed to write an article about the SPLC's manufacturing of hate groups. Now it seems some small town journalist from New Hampshire has finally provided the proof I've needed.[Dead Link]
 
So you see, there is no Brotherhood of Klans Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the SPLC should have called it Curt's Klan, but then they'd be taking the chance that some of their Gentile readers [many of whom are police officers] might actually read some of my material, or worse, investigate whether or not what I write is true, which would be an unmitigated disaster for the SPLC and its sponsor, International Jewry, because unlike them, what I write is backed up with citations and sources.
 
Occasionally the SPLC will set up false front operations, actual groups that portray themselves as if they were Klaverns or Nazi organizations. At present, one of the best examples I know of is Bill White's American National Socialist Workers Party [ANSWP]. Be wary of them and be wary of anyone that actively supports them, they probably aren't working for the good guys. White is always having problems with his membership information being stolen, most recently he's complaining that the FBI stole some information from him through someone else's computer, but the fact of the matter is he's handing them this information and then seeking to explain to his compatriots how it is that the FBI has obtained it without giving away his dog and pony show. Every now and again the SPLC helps him in this effort by listing him as one of America's naughtiest Nazis. It's really so transparent, it's a wonder anyone believes anything the man says.
 
I saved a copy of the SPLC's hate map with Lake Jackson Texas on it, because they'll erase the information and pretend it never existed once one of their shabbas goyim has had an opportunity to peruse this article and inform Potok or the child molester Morris Dees of its content.
 
Wake up America, you're being taken for a ride.

[Anonymous]

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.

He passively allowed people to nail himself onto a cross without protest until dead. I do not see how that in any way represents any sort of victory.

[Christopher Marlowe]

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.

He passively allowed people to nail himself onto a cross without protest until dead. I do not see how that in any way represents any sort of victory.

It must be remembered that Christ rose from the dead, Glorious and Immortal.  There is a Great Mystery in the Cross because it was through this means that Jesus defeated sin and death.  

Jesus Christ, although he had no sin in himself, took on the sins of all humanity.  It is suggested that this happened in the Garden at Gethsemane.  

Lk 22:41; And he was withdrawn away from them a stone's cast; and kneeling down, he prayed, [42] Saying: Father, if thou wilt, remove this chalice from me: but yet not my will, but thine be done. [43] And there appeared to him an angel from heaven, strengthening him. And being in an agony, he prayed the longer. [44] And his sweat became as drops of blood, trickling down upon the ground.

While many suppose that Jesus was referring to the chalice of suffering that he was to undergo, it is also that the chalice mystically contained all the sin of mankind. Naturally Jesus would not desire to take sin unto Himself, but did so out of obedience to His Father.  And soon thereafter we see Jesus' Blood coming out of His Body like sweat.  That is because Jesus' Blood was so pure that it could not stand to be mixed with sin.

The effect of this transformation was that Jesus carried all the sin of mankind with him through all of His suffering and death.  

2 Peter 2:24; Who his own self bore our sins in his body upon the tree: that we, being dead to sins, should live to justice: by whose stripes you were healed.

Thus Jesus can effect his Grace in us by means of our free acceptance of His Divine Will.  All our sins can be removed through the power of the Cross, so that instead of going into death we can have eternal life with Him.  

If Jesus didn't rise from the dead, then the story doesn't make any sense.

1Cor 15:12; Now if Christ be preached, that he arose again from the dead, how do some among you say, that there is no resurrection of the dead? [13] But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen again. [14] And if Christ be not risen again, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain. [15] Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God: because we have given testimony against God, that he hath raised up Christ; whom he hath not raised up, if the dead rise not again.

[16] For if the dead rise not again, neither is Christ risen again. [17] And if Christ be not risen again, your faith is vain, for you are yet in your sins. [18] Then they also that are fallen asleep in Christ, are perished. [19] If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable. [20] But now Christ is risen from the dead, the firstfruits of them that sleep:

It is by the Cross that sin has been defeated. We don't defeat evil by accomplishing evil:

And Jesus knowing their thoughts, said to them: Every kingdom divided against itself shall be made desolate: and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.

[26] And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself: how then shall his kingdom stand? [27] And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges. [28] But if I by the Spirit of God cast out devils, then is the kingdom of God come upon you. [29] Or how can any one enter into the house of the strong, and rifle his goods, unless he first bind the strong? and then he will rifle his house. [30] He that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth.

[Anonymous]

Love your enemy Marlowe ... let me know how that works out for humanity.  Christian fool.

ZS

[checkitb4uwreckit]

I don't really see the point in publicly proclaiming idiotic dreams of violence, except perhaps to make the blog, on which the person is posting such idiocy, the subject of a hate crimes investigation  

Perhaps the point is to express one's outrage at evil Jewish actions?

It must be remembered that Christ rose from the dead

Why don't you go write a comic book or something? You claim to be intelligent yet spew this fantasist garbage as if it's fact. This is wilder fiction than some of the mytho-maniacal tall tales from "survivors" of the holohoax

If Jesus didn't rise from the dead, then the story doesn't make any sense.

Your whole religion doesn't make sense. :crazy:

[Christopher Marlowe]

I don't really see the point in publicly proclaiming idiotic dreams of violence, except perhaps to make the blog, on which the person is posting such idiocy, the subject of a hate crimes investigation  

Perhaps the point is to express one's outrage at evil Jewish actions?

If you go back and read the post, I provided a solid example of why it is foolish to express outrage in that violent manner. I also provided an example of an agent provocateur who is attracting a following of violent fools who are being drawn into the SPLC net.

It must be remembered that Christ rose from the dead

Why don't you go write a comic book or something? You claim to be intelligent yet spew this fantasist garbage as if it's fact. This is wilder fiction than some of the mytho-maniacal tall tales from "survivors" of the holohoax

If you go back an read the post, I was responding to a comment by BJ that said:

He passively allowed people to nail himself onto a cross without protest until dead. I do not see how that in any way represents any sort of victory.

If a person tells only part of the Gospel out of context, it loses its meaning.  I was providing context to give a greater understanding.  

If someone asked why israel would do 9/11, it would help to explain why by providing context: that israel has a history of false flag operations against themselves and other people.  

If Jesus didn't rise from the dead, then the story doesn't make any sense.

Your whole religion doesn't make sense. :crazy:

If someone told me they were agnostic because they didn't find any reason to believe that there was God, I would say that there is evidence, but I might understand that they lack faith enough to believe.  

But if someone said they were atheist, i.e. that they BELIEVED there is no God, then I would have to say that their religion didn't make any sense, and is contrary to any sense of "reason" they pretend to possess.  Rather then merely admit that they lack faith to believe in God, they pretend to have objective proof that God does not exist.  Any standard of proof that they would require to show that God exists, they could not provide to show for their belief in His non-existence.  The atheist cannot prove that God does not exist, but persists in his foolish belief while pretending that he is scientific and logical.  To me, that does not make any sense.

[Wimpy]

If someone told me they were agnostic because they didn't find any reason to believe that there was God, I would say that there is evidence, but I might understand that they lack faith enough to believe.

But if someone said they were atheist, i.e. that they BELIEVED there is no God, then I would have to say that their religion didn't make any sense, and is contrary to any sense of "reason" they pretend to possess. Rather then merely admit that they lack faith to believe in God, they pretend to have objective proof that God does not exist. Any standard of proof that they would require to show that God exists, they could not provide to show for their belief in His non-existence. The atheist cannot prove that God does not exist, but persists in his foolish belief while pretending that he is scientific and logical. To me, that does not make any sense.

Christopher Marlowe

 

[checkitb4uwreckit]

If you go back and read the post, I provided a solid example of why it is foolish to express outrage in that violent manner. I also provided an example of an agent provocateur who is attracting a following of violent fools who are being drawn into the SPLC net.

Americans can say whatever they want without fear of the thought police banging down their door, so it's a moot point. Plus, are you going to live your whole life in fear of some treasonous Jew terror group like the SPLC whose open aim is the destruction of America and White Americans? Grow a pair.

If someone told me they were agnostic because they didn't find any reason to believe that there was God, I would say that there is evidence, but I might understand that they lack faith enough to believe.

What evidence? A book written by primitive men 2000 years ago that contains absurd folklore and scientific impossibilities?  That's not evidence, it's garbage. The Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Mormons, and Scientologists all have their own "Holy Books" too which they hold to be the word of their god/gods and that their religion is the one true religion. You can't all be right, but you can all be wrong. You're all a bunch of delusional nutters.

But if someone said they were atheist, i.e. that they BELIEVED there is no God,

You prove your incompetency and idiocy already. Atheism is not a belief, it is the lack of one. Does it require "belief" to say there are no leprechauns or santa clause? That's how f-ing dumb your statement is.

Rather then merely admit that they lack faith to believe in God, they pretend to have objective proof that God does not exist. Any standard of proof that they would require to show that God exists, they could not provide to show for their belief in His non-existence. The atheist cannot prove that God does not exist, but persists in his foolish belief while pretending that he is scientific and logical. To me, that does not make any sense.

This is borderline retarded. It's like saying that I can't prove that invisible leprechauns don't exist. The burden of proof is not on me as I am not making the claim. The burden of proof is on the person who is making the claim that invisible leprechauns exist. The claimant has to demonstrate this to be true. Since this claim can't be demonstrated to be true using the scientific method, then I can safely dismiss invisible leprechauns as a fictional entity. Does it require a "lack of faith" to disbelieve in leprechauns, santa clause and the tooth fairy? Essentially you're saying that it does.

 :crazy:  :crazy:  :crazy:  :crazy:

[Anonymous]

I don't really see the point in publicly proclaiming idiotic dreams of violence, except perhaps to make the blog, on which the person is posting such idiocy, the subject of a hate crimes investigation  

Perhaps the point is to express one's outrage at evil Jewish actions?

Amazing you have to explain it to this Christian idiot checkitb4uwreckit.

You religious idiots keep this crap up and you will also end up the enemy for your stupidity.

I lived the majority of my life so far believing and practicing "live and let live". NO MORE.

A huge percentage of the reason why we are in this mess is because of the utter stupidity and practices of retards.

You can either handle the real truth or you cannot. You either have the real courage to do what must be done or your in the f'in way of those of us who can & do.

Marlowe, your feeble indoctrinated mind obviously does not understand that people can only be dealt with by REASON or by FORCE. There are realities to this understanding you obviously cannot handle. People like you are pathetic, useless and in the way because you do not operate with reason and obviously do not have the spinal fortitude to deal with force. Your a tool of the jew. Like checkitb4uwreckit said, grow a pair.


ZS

[Christopher Marlowe]

If you go back and read the post, I provided a solid example of why it is foolish to express outrage in that violent manner. I also provided an example of an agent provocateur who is attracting a following of violent fools who are being drawn into the SPLC net.

Americans can say whatever they want without fear of the thought police banging down their door, so it's a moot point. Plus, are you going to live your whole life in fear of some treasonous Jew terror group like the SPLC whose open aim is the destruction of America and White Americans? Grow a pair.

If you want to test the limits of the first amendment in the post 9/11 world, then please do it on another site.  I like TIU and I think it is a valuable resource.

If someone wants to prove how tough they are by making violent statements about killing Jews, I fail to see how that benefits anyone except israel, the ADL, etc... Their existence and funding is dependent upon a boogey-man making threats against Jews.  

1. Making such threats serves no useful purpose.
2. The SPLC creates boogey men to make statements of this type in order to get funding and provide a reason for their existence.  
3. There is a framework already in place that can shut down a site with no repercussions.
4. Setting up a new site is a burden that would be imposed on persons (Ognir, JoeBlow) who did not make the statements and did not invite them.
Conclusion: It is foolish to make such statements on TIU.

Does "growing a pair" make people stupid?

But if someone said they were atheist, i.e. that they BELIEVED there is no God,

You prove your incompetency and idiocy already. Atheism is not a belief, it is the lack of one. Does it require "belief" to say there are no leprechauns or santa clause? That's how f-ing dumb your statement is.

Rather then merely admit that they lack faith to believe in God, they pretend to have objective proof that God does not exist. Any standard of proof that they would require to show that God exists, they could not provide to show for their belief in His non-existence. The atheist cannot prove that God does not exist, but persists in his foolish belief while pretending that he is scientific and logical. To me, that does not make any sense.

This is borderline retarded. It's like saying that I can't prove that invisible leprechauns don't exist. The burden of proof is not on me as I am not making the claim. The burden of proof is on the person who is making the claim that invisible leprechauns exist. The claimant has to demonstrate this to be true. Since this claim can't be demonstrated to be true using the scientific method, then I can safely dismiss invisible leprechauns as a fictional entity. Does it require a "lack of faith" to disbelieve in leprechauns, santa clause and the tooth fairy? Essentially you're saying that it does.

 :crazy:  :crazy:  :crazy:  :crazy:

This is very typical of any conversation with CB4UW, you just call people names and bully them.  But you don't take time to even evaluate what they are saying.  I was careful to discriminate between atheism and agnosticism, but you made no such discrimination.  My whole point is lost to you because you ignored that distinction.  

You say that atheism is not a belief, but look at what the dictionary says:

Oxford English Dictionary (OED), Second Edition

Here is how the OED defines "atheism":

    atheism Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god.

    disbelieve 1. trans. Not to believe or credit; to refuse credence to: a. a statement or (alleged) fact: To reject the truth or reality of.

    deny

        To contradict or gainsay (anything stated or alleged); to declare to be untrue or untenable, or not what it is stated to be.
        Logic. The opposite of affirm; to assert the contradictory of (a proposition).
        To refuse to admit the truth of (a doctrine or tenet); to reject as untrue or unfounded; the opposite of assert or maintain.
        To refuse to recognize or acknowledge (a person or thing) as having a certain character or certain claims; to disown, disavow, repudiate, renounce.

Note that the OED definition covers the whole spectrum of atheist belief, from weak atheism (those who do not believe in or credit the existence of one or more gods) to strong atheism (those who assert the contrary position, that a god does not exist).

Here is the OED's definition of "agnostic":

    agnostic A. sb. One who holds that the existence of anything beyond and behind material phenomena is unknown and (so far as can be judged) unknowable, and especially that a First Cause and an unseen world are subjects of which we know nothing.

Webster's 3rd New International Dictionary Unabridged

Here is Webster's definition of atheism:

    atheism n 1 a: disbelief in the existence of God or any other deity b: the doctrine that there is neither god nor any other deity--compare AGNOSTICISM 2: godlessness esp. in conduct

The word atheist has a weak and strong definition, one is a mere disbelief in God, but the stronger version is a belief or doctrine that there is no God.  When I contrasted atheism to agnosticism, I showed that I was using the stronger version of that word, i.e. that the atheist BELIEVES there is no God.  

As you said:

The burden of proof is on the person who is making the claim....The claimant has to demonstrate this to be true.

If someone asserts that there is no God, this assertion must also be proven as it is an assertion.  The default, or rather the lack of an assertion, would be agnostic. The agnostic does not make a claim. The strong definition of atheist, the distinction that I made when I used those different words, DOES make a claim and so that must also be proven.  As I noted, the atheist cannot prove there is no God by any means that he would require of one who does believe.  This is foolishness and hypocritical.    

This is an example of why having a discussion with CB4UW is like going to the argument clinic in the Monty Python sketch.  He just argues and bullies, but he doesn't take the time to notice anything the other person is saying.

[checkitb4uwreckit]

Typical bullshit spin from the ignoramus Christopher Marlowe. The guy is defending having pure faith in an invisible deity and his slander against Atheism is to claim that it is also "a belief" (something he is trying to defend). Atheists don't have to "prove" anything since we aren't making any claims. What religutards like you are alleging has not been demonstrated to be true in the first place in any capacity congruent with the laws of physics or modern science. You are alleging there is an invisible man sitting int the sky who is all-powerful and all-knowing and that you can telepathically speak to him by pointing your hands at the sky. EITHER PROVE IT OR SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT YOUR RIDICULOUS DELUSIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS .. so far you have offered not a scratch of real proof that this claim is true. You are just making a fool out of yourself.

Asking for atheists to "disprove the existence of god [which god, christian, muslim, hindu, jewish, native indian, ancient greek, ancient roman, ancient egyptian?]" is the equivalent to asking me to "disprove" the existence of invisible leprechauns in your shoes. You're seriously messed up in the head Marlowe, and worthless to the anti-Jewish cause.

[Christopher Marlowe]

Asking for atheists to "disprove the existence of god [which god, christian, muslim, hindu, jewish, native indian, ancient greek, ancient roman, ancient egyptian?]" is the equivalent to asking me to "disprove" the existence of invisible leprechauns in your shoes. You're seriously messed up in the head Marlowe, and worthless to the anti-Jewish cause.

This is why it does not profit people to be bullies and stubbornly argue when they don't know what they are talking about.

There is no default position in logic or in the universe that you, or anyone else can point to that shows there is no God. (Aristotle, the inventor of logic, believed that there IS a God. There is nothing in logic that would presuppose that there is some "Universal Default" that there is no God.) Therefore, to say that there is no God is AN ASSERTION and must be proven. You know very well that if you impose that same standard on proving God and disproving Him, you could NOT prove that there is no God.  

Therefore your disbelief, by YOUR standards, is no more founded than my belief.

Let's take the example of the aether.  This is a physical entity that Tesla and Maxwell believed existed. Einstein's special relativity gave a model of the universe without the hypothetical aether.  Now a bold and conceited idiot who knows nothing about physics might praise Einstein and mock Tesla and Maxwell, and say that there is no aether. But it would still remain for this idiot to PROVE that the aether did not exist. (And it is not possible to prove that the aether does not exist by calling Tesla names.) There is NO universal default in logic which says that the existence of a thing, being, thought, etc... does not exist until it is proven otherwise.

You stumble over this again and again, but you refuse to admit error. All you can do is call names and bully people, but that will never make up for ignorance.  You are very rude and you would not do this in real life to anyone who was bigger than you.  You can only pick fights and bully people online where you are safe from retribution. That is a very cowardly way to behave.  You should grow up and learn some manners.

[checkitb4uwreckit]

More stupid whinging bullshit from Marlowe. He just can't admit that he has no evidence for the Christian god, none at all. Believing in the Christian god is equivalent to believing in Holocaustianity. The christian religion endeavors to suppress "blasphemy", demands conformity in terms of orthodox belief, demands people uphold of the correct dogma, etc — all of these are hallmarks of the religion of Holocaustianity too.

Hey, I've gotten in peoples faces in real life and told them the Holocaust is an out and out hoax and that JEWS are guilty of the genocide they accuse Germans of. I almost got in a scrap the other night at a party when these two morons were astonishingly denying that Auschwitz had a swimming pool and a soccer field. So don't fucking call me a coward big-shot. You don't even know me.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

I will say it over and over: Christianity does not have a program for victory over the Jews, despite its alleged opposition to Judaism, despite its main character's Jewish-directed execution and those of his early followers all of whom were Jewish rebels. No, it glories in the symbol of Jesus' execution, the cross! How insane is that? The cross represents the ultimate Jewish victory over their enemies, the Christians. The cross represents the death penalty for believing in Jesus. It represents surrender to the Jews. That is why I consider Christianity to be our deadliest enemy, deadlier than the Jews themselves.

Christianity represents surrender to any potential killer such as Stalin, Mao or some uniformed dope at a roadblock. Christianity is what holds us in check when our instinct is to defend ourselves with deadly force. The damage done to humanity by Christianity is difficult to gauge, considering also the mass murdering of humanity by Christianity itself, back in its gory glory days. An estimated four million women were burned, hanged or drowned by Catholic priests who accused them of being witches. Protestant witch-doctors did the same thing in Massachusetts and Connecticut right up to the 18th Century.

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.  The devil is the real enemy, the power of the Jews in society is a symptom of our fallen sinful state.  If people increased their faith in Christ, we would see Jewish power evaporate.  Where do Jews derive their power? Money, war, pornography, prostitution. If we could have the Grace to resist temptation to sin, these powers would melt away. We are ruled by money because of our greed; We are ruled by war because of our hatred and fear; we are ruled by pornography and prostitution because of our insatiable lust.

All the sin of the world perished on the cross, and Christ's Grace is freely available to those who are open to it. There is power in the cross, that is why atheistic Jews hate the cross and want it removed. To contemplate Christ on the Cross is to pray.  

This post is not really well researched: an estimated four million women burned, hanged or drowned by priests who accused them of being witches? Where did that come from? Nizkor? Total BS statistic.

I'm very suspicious of people who come onto TIU advocating violence against Jews collectively.  It makes me think that such a person is trying to create evidence for some "Hate Crime Commission" to say that TIU is a "Hate Site" that needs to be shut down.

Exactly, brother. This is what I have been trying to get through to the Christian Identifiers on this board—that the Jews are not the embodiment of sin itself but the willing primary perpetuators of it. It's like they believe sin would not exist on Earth if Jews weren't around. It would! Zionist Sniper is an obvious agent provocateur—that or a real jarhead who took too many blows to the head while serving in the armed forces.

[abduLMaria]

The Cross represents Christ's victory over sin.  The devil is the real enemy, the power of the Jews in society is a symptom of our fallen sinful state.  If people increased their faith in Christ, we would see Jewish power evaporate.  Where do Jews derive their power? Money, war, pornography, prostitution. If we could have the Grace to resist temptation to sin, these powers would melt away.
...

I'm very suspicious of people who come onto TIU advocating violence against Jews collectively.  It makes me think that such a person is trying to create evidence for some "Hate Crime Commission" to say that TIU is a "Hate Site" that needs to be shut down.

every 'Christian' that i know walks around in a semi-blissful stupor, continually reminding themselves that everything will be all right because they accepted JC as their Savior.

if they are able to tell the truth about criminality in the US government & the world, they keep it to themselves.  they want to believe in the "good in man", even if at the Zionist level there is very little of it.


yes, advocating violence against any person does endanger TIU - it can be used as a reason to shut down TIU.  that doesn't mean it's an inappropriate course of action, merely that the 'laws of the land' (as formulated by legislators like Pelosi, who are puppets for the Zionists) can & will be used to shut down forums where such truths are told.

however, that doesn't change the fact that the Rabbi's, among others, need to be separated from society for society to heal.  i prefer the metaphor of straitjackets & incarceration for them.

i estimate that among Jews, 1/3 are basically moral, 1/3 are pure evil (e.g. Elliott Abrams' wife, Gosh what a Satanic Bitch, & 1/3 are in the middle, happy to suck off the tit of Jewish nepotism & feel they should "support Israel" (e.g. Harvey Organ, he's a pharmacist who also invests in precious metals and somehow has the energy to analyze precious metal market activity 5 days a week - that's how i know him, his blog.)

[Christopher Marlowe]

every 'Christian' that i know walks around in a semi-blissful stupor, continually reminding themselves that everything will be all right because they accepted JC as their Savior.

if they are able to tell the truth about criminality in the US government & the world, they keep it to themselves. they want to believe in the "good in man", even if at the Zionist level there is very little of it.

I don't know about blissful stupors, but I think that if someone is walking in Faith, there is nothing to fear.

As for people who don't tell the truth or keep the truth to themselves, they are obviously not walking in Faith, because their fear of the Jews is keeping them silent.  

I look at Bishop Williamson, and I see a good example of someone walking in Faith.  He has spoken out against 9/11 and the holohoax, and he has been punished for it.  If a Christian has Faith, then he knows that he may be persecuted for telling the Truth, but that it merits a heavenly reward:

Matt 5:10; Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
[11] Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: [12] Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.

On the other hand, we have the Vatican pronouncements on israel and the Jews. For example, on the 11/12 edition of the Ugly Truth podcast, Mark Glen talks about the Pope meeting with the chief rabbi of israel, and saying that there is a special relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jews.  As Glen points out, Christians have more in common with Muslims because they also believe that Jesus is the Messiah.  But there is no special relationship with the Jews because the Talmud blasphemes Jesus and the Blessed Mother, and because the whole of Judaism is premised upon the rejection of Jesus Christ.  Here's what today's Gospel said:

While people were listening to Jesus speak,
he proceeded to tell a parable because he was near Jerusalem
and they thought that the Kingdom of God
would appear there immediately.
So he said,
"A nobleman went off to a distant country
to obtain the kingship for himself and then to return.
He called ten of his servants and gave them ten gold coins
and told them, 'Engage in trade with these until I return.'
His fellow citizens, however, despised him
and sent a delegation after him to announce,
'"We do not want this man to be our king.'
But when he returned after obtaining the kingship,
he had the servants called, to whom he had given the money,
to learn what they had gained by trading....
'I tell you,
to everyone who has, more will be given,
but from the one who has not,
even what he has will be taken away.
Now as for those enemies of mine who did not want me as their king,
bring them here and slay them before me.'"

After he had said this,
he proceeded on his journey up to Jerusalem.

Jesus says that His fellow citizens despised Him and did not want Him to be King. Who despised him? The Jewish rabbis and the chief priests. They plotted to kill Jesus, and for two thousand years they have proclaimed that they do not want Jesus to be their King.  The parable says that when the King returns, His enemies are slain before Him.  If this parable means that Jesus' enemies are the Jews who fought against Him, then it would be hard to understand why the Pope would say that there is a special relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jews.  Hasn't the Pope read the Gospel?  

I would say that this is an example of someone not telling the truth about criminality in the US and the world.  Before John Paul II, the Catholic Church did not recognize israel. The Church leaders knew that the Jews had killed Christians as well as Muslims when they stole the land in Palestine. The Church knew the terrorist history of israel.   John Paul II seemed to turn a blind eye to Jewish criminality, and this has continued under Benedict.  There was even a recent Vatican press release calling for a world bank!?!  

To my mind, these people are not walking in Faith, and it shows because their sense of reason has become occluded.  A blissful stupor is not the result of practicing the Catholic Faith, so perhaps these people are only feigning true worship.  

Love justice, you who judge the earth;
think of the Lord in goodness,
and seek him in integrity of heart;
Because he is found by those who test him not,
and he manifests himself to those who do not disbelieve him.
For perverse counsels separate a man from God,
and his power, put to the proof, rebukes the foolhardy;
Because into a soul that plots evil, wisdom enters not,
nor dwells she in a body under debt of sin.
For the holy Spirit of discipline flees deceit
and withdraws from senseless counsels;
and when injustice occurs it is rebuked.
For wisdom is a kindly spirit,
yet she acquits not the blasphemer of his guilty lips;
Because God is the witness of his inmost self
and the sure observer of his heart
and the listener to his tongue.
For the Spirit of the Lord fills the world,
is all-embracing, and knows what man says.

[checkitb4uwreckit]

I look at Bishop Williamson, and I see a good example of someone walking in Faith.  He has spoken out against 9/11 and the holohoax, and he has been punished for it.  If a Christian has Faith, then he knows that he may be persecuted for telling the Truth, but that it merits a heavenly reward:

Matt 5:10; Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
[11] Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: [12] Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.

So you only endeavor to speak out against Jews because you believe that you are promised by your invisible deity that you will live forever in a magical fairy realm? So essentially you don't speak truth because it's the right and just thing to do, but because you think you will be rewarded for it.

So essentially you're an opportunist.  :think:

[GordZilla]

I look at Bishop Williamson, and I see a good example of someone walking in Faith.  He has spoken out against 9/11 and the holohoax, and he has been punished for it.  If a Christian has Faith, then he knows that he may be persecuted for telling the Truth, but that it merits a heavenly reward:

Matt 5:10; Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
[11] Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: [12] Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.

So you only endeavor to speak out against Jews because you believe that you are promised by your invisible deity that you will live forever in a magical fairy realm? So essentially you don't speak truth because it's the right and just thing to do, but because you think you will be rewarded for it.

So essentially you're an opportunist.  :think:

To me, at this point in the game and with our terribly few numbers, that makes him a good ally, and likewise you. I consider you an ally too because, despite our differences, we both know -damn well- who the real enemy is. When will we get past this stuff?  I will side with just about anyone who is 'Jew wise' and has a real want (and need)  to expose the Jew to others, whatever direction they take in that endeavor and no matter how many people they reach. If we all do our small part, our numbers will grow. If one uses faith or not, or even lack of faith, to help expose the Jew to others than it really doesn't matter what their individual methods are. What matters is they're being exposed.  It's not a competition for bragging rights or to inflate egos, or -for that matter- to insure one's place in heaven (I'm sure Christopher knows this, btw, I'm just making a point), for that too would make the fiercest competitors out to be nothing more than opportunists themselves. After all, what is the worth? What is our worth? If I reach 10 people,  Christopher reaches 100 and you reach 1000?  The worth is still the sum and nothing more; 1110 (in this case). Not who was the most effective, but rather that our numbers increased by our combined efforts -that is what matters that is the worth, and now more than ever. That is what is right and just. Us -TOGETHER - all doing our small parts.

 We need to get past this .

[checkitb4uwreckit]

To me, at this point in the game and with our terribly few numbers, that makes him a good ally, and likewise you. I consider you an ally too because, despite our differences, we both know -damn well- who the real enemy is. When will we get past this stuff?  I will side with just about anyone who is 'Jew wise' and has a real want (and need)  to expose the Jew to others, whatever direction they take in that endeavor and no matter how many people they reach. If we all do our small part, our numbers will grow. If one uses faith or not, or even lack of faith, to help expose the Jew to others than it really doesn't matter what their individual methods are. What matters is they're being exposed.  It's not a competition for bragging rights or to inflate egos, or -for that matter- to insure one's place in heaven (I'm sure Christopher knows this, btw, I'm just making a point), for that too would make the fiercest competitors out to be nothing more than opportunists themselves. After all, what is the worth? What is our worth? If I reach 10 people,  Christopher reaches 100 and you reach 1000?  The worth is still the sum and nothing more; 1110 (in this case). Not who was the most effective, but rather that our numbers increased by our combined efforts -that is what matters that is the worth, and now more than ever. That is what is right and just. Us -TOGETHER - all doing our small parts.

 We need to get past this .

If you guys would actually expose Jews however way you can, instead of just posting religious garbage 24/7 on this forum, then maybe we would get somewhere.  :roll: