Re: Khazars, the Kabbalah and Jew Death Cults

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 01:05:13 AM

Quote from: "mgt23"
QuoteLook Tim and Mgt23 this thread started out as "German Death Cults" but was changed to Jew Death cults because ritualized Semitic human sacrifice was pretty common place in the ancient world-- and has only persisted among Jews practicing Babylonian rituals in modern times.
............disingenous. as i pointed out It was a german ashkenazi yiddish khazar death cult. A mouthful.....maybe german jew death cult would have been better and i acknowledged that in this thread. As it ever occurred to you why Rothschild was put in charge of financing hessian mercenaries to the house of Hanover? They both have Judaism as a core. One is Zohar the other is Talmudic. Together this double act has fucked europe for a thousand years. Fuck the monarchy and fuck the jew.

QuoteThe mention of Lilith is not "Christian". The New Testament and Old Testament do not have references to this "demon". It is however known in Muslim and Jewish texts.

QuoteLilith is Jewish/Arab mysticism and has zero connection with European Christianity. The current Talmudic Semitic Jews worship Saturn like many others in the near East did in ancient times. Jews and possibly Muslims have carried down aspects of this into modern times.

.....I beg to differ. It is a female wind spirit. For fucks sake it was YOU CSR that put me onto the sumerian Lillitu in the first place and i see it repeatedly again and again. It is Heqet for certain and there is definitely a Celtic equivalent. The scarlet woman they think is the land itself, "mother earth" hence the rewriting of Arthur as "of the dragon"...."Arthur and the land are one" etc etc It is the same spirit that Elijah saw. The same as what took enoch to heaven. It occurs in many different mythologys. What you have to understand is that earth doesnt just mean Terra it means cosmos. There is singularity,void,cosmos...thats her triple aspect.

QuoteFor some reason, you two love to "Conflate" the NSDAP (Nazis) with Jew crap mysticism/Jew crap "Satanism". Consequently, this thread has been aimless and has wandered over many topics after the "Occult Nazi" theories were debunked as typical pulp-novel Jew crap. Proving a link between the two was the initial intent of the entire thread apparently.
.........prebanning by NSDAP of Saturn lodges, prove that. It's not a "wandering thread", it's bringing together ideas i have been mulling for years now that the jew has created a Saturn dialectic. As I've stated isn't it funny how all these neo-nazi groups if you read their manifestos all support Zionism/Israel and classify the Jew as a race. Lets thank the NSDAP for that shall we.....next catholics are a race or sikhs. Blah fucking blah. On this point you talk such shit CSR and sound scizophrenic when trying to square the circle. My thesis explains why they think they are a race and a religion. Yours doesn't. And it doesn't because it's a product of the dialectic.

QuoteBefore I forget, the "JEWS" are a race. Though they did proselytize at times in their "racial-religious" history, they are a race just look for the "J Haplotype"... don't conflate Henry Makow B.S. with these facts on the Jewish race... but I guess you guys can't help yourselves....
.......wtf are you talking about? I offered no support of Makows views on race. The Jews are an ethno bi/religious caste nothing more. Your narrow view of the J-Haplotype ignores most jews you fool.

.......the Jew has found a way of transmigrating consciousness' from body to body using DMT. They do it by destroying the ego and giving it to the serpent/void spirit. Your stupid dogmatic view of race doesn't apply in this sense. Anyone can be possessed, the Jew just institutionalized it. Your idiotic view CSR is going to get people killed.

Aleister Crowley's Ka i know has been passed around as was Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Their cult acolytes give their bodies to be possessed by their idols Ka. They didn't die. That is the whole point surrounding the cult of Baal worship. Now fucking grow up and realise what I'm telling you is from experience, not from some propaganda points scoring game against you.

Mgt23... this is the link where Lilith was mentioned and it was connected to Canaanite child sacrifice:

viewtopic.php?f=41&t=9919&start=0

Mgt23...dude you got to quit tripping on DMT... the Jews are very much rooted in "this" (base) world of flesh and blood -- not in a world of DMT fantasy.
Jews are not rooted in "Christ" and hence have no salvation--they still worship Baal and are classic "Pagans". You for some reason want to mix a million things in your "pot" and smoke it. And sadly, yes, Jews are a "race" however you want to define it--much like Arabs or Bedouins or Icelanders. We are people of many races. Jews have a genetic haplotype of "J". I didn't make this up scientists and geneticists did.

Sorry dude you've got to stop watching Jew inspired Horror-Demon flicks... they "conflate" so many things.

[youtube:2ghusetl]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4XoSmUoZIY[/youtube]2ghusetl]

[youtube:2ghusetl]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kbQAJR9YWQ[/youtube]2ghusetl]

mgt23 · November 04, 2012, 01:45:08 AM

QuoteMgt23... this is the link where Lilith was mentioned and it was connected to Canaanite child sacrifice:

.....thats not the one i'm refering to. Thats a Talmudic corruption of of Lillitu which was a sumerian "nightime wind spirit of inspiration" which in later sumerian mythology became demonised, probably by patriachy as disease bearing. It was not how lillitu was originally seen in old sumeria and I don't think she originally came from there either.

QuoteMgt23...dude you got to quit tripping on DMT... the Jews are very much rooted in "this" (base) world of flesh and blood -- not in a world of DMT fantasy.

......thats where you are wrong. The old mystery schools and shamanic tradition had worked out how to manipulate and induce naturally occurring DMT in the spinal fluid and in some traditions supplement it with naturally synthesized variants. The christians under John the Baptist had worked out that Cold temperature water immersion releases DMT and gets rid of possession. It was also symbolic of rebirth from the womb. It was not unique to Christians. Also witches got dunked for the same reason as they were seen as possessed.

QuoteJews are not rooted in "Christ" and hence have no salvation--they still worship Baal and are classic "Pagans".

.....at least some agreement. What your not saying however is how they perpetuated the Baal. My Thesis explains that.

QuoteYou for some reason want to mix a million things in your "pot" and smoke it. And sadly, yes, Jews are a "race" however you want to define it--much like Arabs or Bedouins or Icelanders. We are people of many races. Jews have a genetic haplotype of "J". I didn't make this up scientists and geneticists did.

.......again wrong. Just because a religious caste inbreds over two thousand years doesn't make them a race, nor does it even matter. You miss the point entirely that every soul has a choice, regardless of its genetics.

Your view is just as bad as the jews.....in fact maybe you should get yourself tested for Haplogroup J disease.

......btw I consider myself a Technical Conspiracy Theorist and not some Patriotard like you.

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 01:23:56 AM

Quote from: "mgt23"Your view is just as bad as the jews.....in fact maybe you should get yourself tested for Haplogroup J disease.

......btw I consider myself a Technical Conspiracy Theorist and not some Patriotard like you.

I have tested myself, and I have ZERO jewish genes. I am Scot-Irish-Welsh-English-German in my family background in the USA going back to the 1700s. 100% Indo-European R1b1 and some I. I am a "realist" and have zero connection with the JewTarded Patriotard movement so don't take a juvenile perspective. My "view" is based on facts and personal experience with corrupt J-Tribers both Sephardic and Ashkenazi types. IMHO, they just can't help themselves... and will always be "Jewish" to the tribal letter. You guys obviously don't know Jews and their levels of corruption -- if you did, you would be more circumspect and specific... but you just go "all-blanket" and toss one on the "haters" (i.e. people opposing their schemes). I'm a "realist"... because there are "real problems" because of G-Damned J-Triber scams all over the world.

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 04, 2012, 01:33:41 AM

Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"
Quote from: "mgt23"Your view is just as bad as the jews.....in fact maybe you should get yourself tested for Haplogroup J disease.

......btw I consider myself a Technical Conspiracy Theorist and not some Patriotard like you.

I have tested myself, and I have ZERO jewish genes. I am Scot-Irish-Welsh-English-German in my family background in the USA going back to the 1700s. 100% Indo-European R1b1 and some I. I am a "realist" and have zero connection with the JewTarded Patriotard movement so don't take a juvenile perspective. My "view" is based on facts and personal experience with corrupt J-Tribers both Sephardic and Ashkenazi types. IMHO, they just can't help themselves... and will always be "Jewish" to the tribal letter. You guys obviously don't know Jews and their levels of corruption -- if you did, you would be more circumspect and specific... but you just go "all-blanket" and toss one on the "haters" (i.e. people opposing their schemes). I'm a "realist"... because there are "real problems" because of G-Damned J-Triber scams all over the world.

You are missing the point, as you have done so many other times, CSR. What is the point in overthrowing racial Jewish hegemony only to replace it with another racial hegemony? Become like Jews to defeat Jews? Is that logical?

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 02:00:06 AM

Quote from: "Timothy_Fitzpatrick"
Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"
Quote from: "mgt23"Your view is just as bad as the jews.....in fact maybe you should get yourself tested for Haplogroup J disease.

......btw I consider myself a Technical Conspiracy Theorist and not some Patriotard like you.

I have tested myself, and I have ZERO jewish genes. I am Scot-Irish-Welsh-English-German in my family background in the USA going back to the 1700s. 100% Indo-European R1b1 and some I. I am a "realist" and have zero connection with the JewTarded Patriotard movement so don't take a juvenile perspective. My "view" is based on facts and personal experience with corrupt J-Tribers both Sephardic and Ashkenazi types. IMHO, they just can't help themselves... and will always be "Jewish" to the tribal letter. You guys obviously don't know Jews and their levels of corruption -- if you did, you would be more circumspect and specific... but you just go "all-blanket" and toss one on the "haters" (i.e. people opposing their schemes). I'm a "realist"... because there are "real problems" because of G-Damned J-Triber scams all over the world.

QuoteYou are missing the point, as you have done so many other times, CSR. What is the point in overthrowing racial Jewish hegemony only to replace it with another racial hegemony? Become like Jews to defeat Jews? Is that logical?

You are like New Jersey or New York right now Tim with that perspective -- you think it is only "normal" that Jews rip you off.

mgt23 · November 04, 2012, 02:05:37 AM

QuoteBecome like Jews to defeat Jews?

.......thats exactly what the Jews want and the whole dialectic premiss of this thread which CSR is SO VERY KEEN TO DISCREDIT.

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 04, 2012, 02:09:44 AM

Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"You are like New Jersey or New York right now Tim with that perspective -- you think it is only "normal" that Jews rip you off.

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said do nothing about the Jewish problem. I'm simply questioning your integrity and your proposed solutions.

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 02:20:28 AM

Quote from: "Timothy_Fitzpatrick"
Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"You are like New Jersey or New York right now Tim with that perspective -- you think it is only "normal" that Jews rip you off.

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said do nothing about the Jewish problem. I'm simply questioning your integrity and your proposed solutions.

Well, what are your solutions then? You appear to be okay with Jew Rip-offs... or calling people like Zundel a quasi-Jew Ripoff? Where do the lines set with you? You want it to be a game when you see resistance to the God Damned Jews. Both of you idiots immediately go directly to "compromised" when any kind of "people" are mentioned... well F.That Sh*t. I've seen it here for years and now I'm like F'it. You carry water for the Jew Frankfort school. It's not "logical" it is simply seeing them as something that needs to be kicked off. A parasite is a parasite--whether in politics or Jew Bond Usury... but both of you are too ignorant of economics to even begin to see that massive big picture so you resort to little Jew written tomes to "complain" about "Nazis". Sick of it dudes... just sick of it. WHERE DO YOU STAND?

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 04, 2012, 02:33:55 AM

Both mgt and I have been posting here for years; I think it's pretty obvious where we stand. I could see how someone might not see this if they were so wrapped up in their own little world of Nazi revivalism.

Why is it that discussions of this nature with people like you always degenerate into who does more or better work for the movement?

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 02:45:57 AM

Quote from: "Timothy_Fitzpatrick"Both mgt and I have been posting here for years; I think it's pretty obvious where we stand. I could see how someone might not see this if they were so wrapped up in their own little world of Nazi revivalism.

Why is it that discussions of this nature with people like you always degenerate into who does more or better work for the movement?

I mince no words Tim. You see the Nazis as "compromised" since you read Jewish written books... I have different point of view that is non-Jewish. When people are bankrupt they will begin to ask basic questions. You see it all as a major "spiritual battle"... but it is much more... more in ways that you are pretty much innocent of. Jew scams in the Bond market will ripoff 'Goyim' for generations if not resisted. The Nazis were fire to the furnace resistance to the Jews... call it any other way you want to see it... but the world is in the same J-Sh*t lit on fire ... and you want to call people with a boot on ready to kick their scamming asses off as "compromised"... that is why I ask... where do you stand? Nazis or no Nazis... are you okay with the Jew induced ripoffs? Or Jews sending people to jail for exercising their right to free expression? (Zundel, Topham, et.al?) that's why I call you "Britzie" because you are "ok" with a Jew ripoff (like most "Britzies" since 1694).

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 04, 2012, 02:59:47 AM

You assume that because people won't convert to the occult through the Nazi school that they are OK with Jew ripoffs. There is not an ounce of truth or logic in this. And I don't see Nazis as merely compromised. I see them as part of the problem. I don't view Jews and Nazis differently. They are the same. You are like them.

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 04, 2012, 03:05:05 AM

Like I said Tim... where do you stand? I think you stand with Jew written books talking about the Nazis. I already pretty much proved that.

Wimpy · November 04, 2012, 12:00:51 PM

Quote from: "Timothy_Fitzpatrick"You assume that because people won't convert to the occult through the Nazi school that they are OK with Jew ripoffs. There is not an ounce of truth or logic in this. And I don't see Nazis as merely compromised. I see them as part of the problem. I don't view Jews and Nazis differently. They are the same. You are like them.

The jew criminals won't be prayed away or wished away, Timothy. We need to kick the money changers out, literally, as Jesus showed us. The Germans tried and are now vilified, regardless of your highlighting and elaborating some of their side note diversions & perversions.

Me thinks you are confusing certain personality defects and German social/religious deviance and the core of their intent: Stopping the Bolshevik conquest of Germany, Europe & the World. I'm with CSR,

Quote...where do you stand?

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 04, 2012, 01:04:20 PM

Quote from: "Wimpy"
Quote from: "Timothy_Fitzpatrick"You assume that because people won't convert to the occult through the Nazi school that they are OK with Jew ripoffs. There is not an ounce of truth or logic in this. And I don't see Nazis as merely compromised. I see them as part of the problem. I don't view Jews and Nazis differently. They are the same. You are like them.

The jew criminals won't be prayed away or wished away, Timothy. We need to kick the money changers out, literally, as Jesus showed us. The Germans tried and are now vilified, regardless of your highlighting and elaborating some of their side note diversions & perversions.

Me thinks you are confusing certain personality defects and German social/religious deviance and the core of their intent: Stopping the Bolshevik conquest of Germany, Europe & the World. I'm with CSR,
Quote...where do you stand?

But the Nazis didn't try to throw the moneychangers out. I think that is the whole point. All they did was intern rank-and-file Jews while making backdoor deals with Jew bankers. Michael K did a good job of demonstrating that Germany was not an autarky.

Wimpy · November 04, 2012, 02:00:17 PM

Good point, Timothy.

mgt23 · November 04, 2012, 11:44:01 PM

mgt23 · November 05, 2012, 03:25:16 PM

[youtube:308oe742]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSw8kEqNOxw[/youtube]308oe742]

........replace the word "Illuminati" with "FEMALE JEWS(Prostitutes)" and you start to see what I'm talking about in this thesis. These FEMALE JEWS are in fact possessed by VOID/SERPENT thoughtforms existing in internal thoughtspace via DMT hallucination.

..........MALE JEWS(the bankers/rabbis etc etc), then become enslaved ala the ZOHAR, because they are unable to help who they fall in love with. Unfortunately, the FEMALE JEW is a envious bitch, hellbent on being as evil as possible because of her own refusal to acknowledge her own neurotic-inferiority complex.

This gets slightly more complicated when internal possession gender change has taken place. But you are essentially looking at the tone octave of the internal jew voice. In theory you can mindscan for it in any said subject. A qarina is where the possession is not full taken over but the person not only listens to the parasite but will obey it.

Combine the MALE and FEMALE JEWS and you have the complete dialectic system in motion. You see what Icke/Rense/Everard/Tsarion/Wilcock/Maxwell/Cooper + stupid nazis like CSR/METZGER/ZUNDEL/LADY RENOUF/IRVING are not telling you is that the conspiracy is a combination of a MALE SEX CULT(motivated by money) and a FEMALE MURDER CULT(motivated by sex)

This is the truth of the conspiracy...............fuck you CSR your a LIAR and a sellout to the actual truth and that makes you a JEW in my book. I'm so fucking glad I'm not a JEW or a stoopid NAZI and that I am myself and an independent. I hope others see independence in the same light.

GordZilla · November 05, 2012, 03:42:55 PM

Seriously? Now it's "Fuck you CSR"?!? Settle down, there is no need for that. CSR has contributed much to this site, to this path of knowledge, as have you. You disagree with him - we get it - but why this aggressive BS? We're on the same team here, in the end, and I see all of you as my brothers in this fight so please drop the BS name calling and passive aggressiveness, we should be above that by now. So you disagree with him on Hitler, that is hardly our main (and collective) problem now is it? Regardless of where you stand about Hitler or Nazis it will not change our current predicament in the slightest, except for the Jew- he loves it when we fight amongst ourselves.

P.S> "BS" stands for 'Bull Shit' and not 'Bradford-Smith' -although, granted, they are very closely related.

mgt23 · November 05, 2012, 03:53:47 PM

.......no way Gord. CSR smells to me. He's putting ideology before truth.

QuoteRegardless of where you stand about Hitler or Nazis it will not change our current predicament in the slightest, except for the Jew- he loves it when we fight amongst ourselves.

CSR is preventing correct Targeting which I have tried to show him. When the time comes we have to take all of em out, with correct strategy without exception with precision. CSR stupidity is preventing that. That makes me fucking wonder about him.

I also dont like comments that "some/we/group have suspicions about me(and fitzpatrick, but i speak for me) and thats all I can say at this point". Dickhead, he sounds like a whiney fucking jew, complaining when he stoopid cult gets busted and binned along with the jew.

I'm convinced I've got this dialectic sussed now. He is part of the problem definitely. He smells.

Also I judge someone not on the number of posts but on the quality of material. My thesis is shit hot and dumbfuck(outside of his Saturn contribution) can't handle its explanatory power because its outside of his ideology. He's never put forward his own theories ever and really is only a propaganda mouthpiece sometimes, regardless if he gets good material on the jew. He has a very flawed ignorant understanding of the jew and the antidote. That makes him dangerous.

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 05, 2012, 07:54:48 PM

Gord, I have to agree with mgt23. This Nazi revivalism that really ramped up following the departure of ZCF is counter-productive. Firstly, it discredits the movement. Secondly, it does not hit at the core of the problem, which mgt23 has nailed down impeccably. The Kabbalah is the source of Mystery Babylon, the New Age, the Occult, and Nazism itself, which uses the same Kabbalistic ideology of elevating man above God—and man above other men—using black and white magic. If you don't believe in God, fine, but Nazism is a religion based in the occult. It's simple: Nazism is magic...the same magic Jews use. Jews and Nazis: one is the Sephiroth, the other is the Qlippoth. Both want their olam ha ba on Earth now, one headquartered in Jerusalem, the other in Atlantis. And you wonder why neo-Nazis only argue things like the Holocaust and the Talmud, while leaving the Kabbalah untouched. If Jews are the elephant in the room on a worldly scale, then the Kabbalah is the elephant in the Nazi's room.

Now you try to battle another occult religion, Talmudic Judaism? It won't work. Evil cannot overcome evil. And, yes, mgt23 is correct that CSR is letting his ideology overwhelm truth and scholarship. Where would revisionism be today if it weren't for Nazi revivalists like Ernst Zundel messing it up? Nobody will touch revisionism anymore because it has been so badly discredited. It's not good enough that people like Zundel stand up for what they believe. It matters that they stand up for truth, not half truths. The time for half measures and half truths is over.

GordZilla · November 05, 2012, 09:57:47 PM

Sorry for the book, you know me

;

CSR is a good person, he is not deserving of these blatant attacks, you want him to debate you and that is healthy but I'm sure we can do that with some respect and civility. That's what I was getting at in that last post. That stuff makes us all look bad.

As for the occult in Nazism, you guys haven't sold me on that yet neither. What I know so far about it comes from two camps. One camp is predominately lead by Jewish writers, and where there are not Jews penning the work itself it is almost certainly produced by, marketed by and published by Jews. Hell you can watch the 'Occult and Nazis' on main stream TV. This is a 'sale' that is predominately lead by Jews and to me that is one big f'n strike against it. It is not the only one though.

The other strike against it is the other camp itself; Hitler's own words and deeds. Hitler fought hard against Masonry and Cabalistic Jews - hell just 'Jews' in general. He was not into mysticism but rather filled his head with no-nonsense and logical pursuits. In fact, like it was for so many like-minded men before and after him, it was this solid foundation in truth and logic that made him one of the Jew's greatest enemies - right up there with Jesus. I like that about him, and men like Henry Ford or Father Coughlin etc .. this 'no nonsense' approach to matters. They say it like it is and let the cards fall where they may -consequences be damned. That's also why I have much respect for CSR, in my opinion he is that same type of person, wears it on his sleeve and says it exactly as he sees it.

I don't have much respect for people who think 'racism' is a real thing and not just the Jewish construct that it is. Race is real, yes this is true and I myself am all for racial pride but 'racism' is a vice with an agenda. Regardless of the race in question, racial pride is a good thing. The problem is with this invented construct of 'racism' (which really only means anti-white) is the stress and distrust it puts, rather introduces, on races. I've seen, for myself, in some of the most politically correct schools in the world the way races will act naturally. Give people the choice and freewill and they are likely to self segregate anyway, and there is nothing wrong with that - people (in general) are most comfortable with their own kin. It is this artificial construct of 'racism' that makes us all feel guilty for this natural self segregation, it's something we've always done and we still managed to have respect for one another, but now it carries a new (and fictional) burden. 'Racism' brings into the fold a completely new dynamic and one that is entirely unjust and certainly bias. There is nothing wrong with Black pride or Chinese pride, or Indian pride but look what happens when you say 'White pride' ...Do you see it? Immediately it's perceived (and by some in this very forum) that 'White pride' equates to 'White supremacy'... Why is that? Because 'racism ' is a construct used by the Jew to cause divide, hate and to target - first and foremost- their traditional enemy. Their most successful enemy. Stories of Hitler and the Aryan race also play into this, but again the real facts of history do not support this view, Hitler loved Germany first, yes, but he had no problem enlisting anyone else to serve in his cause -regardless of color- he didn't discriminate there. Biggest proof of this, by far, is the fact Japan allied with him. I mean what the hell where they thinking? If you believe this 'aryan race' bullshit card then how to you square that fact? So that line of the argument is for fools only - in my opinion. Careful and fair examination of the facts -FROM THE SORCE and not Jews reveals this to be true. It's doesn't take much digging neither. Hitler himself was not Aryan.... :crazy:

'Mysticism' was another thing Hitler put no stock in, contrary to popular belief (and I mean propagated 'popular' belief) . Hitler went out of his way to destroy Cabbalist establishments almost from the get go. That on its face runs contrary to what you two are trying to sell here (just leave this argument to the Jew's, believe me they don't need any more help on this front - they already have the History channel). Hitler had a agenda to rid Germany of Masonic temples and Jewish mysticism. The only thing you can honestly link to him as far as the occult goes, is some of the symbology he choose to utilize for his campaign. And yes it's there, but many of these symbols have disputed origins and many are innocuous at best. Another fool's errand.

Now I'm admittedly not sighting from anything to make these two points above other than Hitler's own words and deeds... I still maintain that is the best source when trying to discover the truth about him -and national socialism.

Now as far as the 'occult' goes, and this question of Hitler being part of it and that in turn being very relevant in our current fight, ... well ... I can't see it. Not at all. The occult is rendered powerless with just a little exposer, something Hitler knew well...and he did expose it (and long before us). Magic itself is nothing more than illusion, and so is the occult... it's only power lies in its secrecy and illusion... it is not a formidable enemy at all -not against truth. Just do what Hitler did, shine the light on it for all to see and it erodes rapidly. Tell the truth and the lies fail - another thing Hitler knew well.

When I look at what Hitler did for Germany I see a gentile country that was finally liberated from Jewish occultic repression (albeit briefly). I see that things got very good for the people, a people who in turn admired (and loved) their leader. I see a nation brought back from the brink by a man who's pursuit of knowledge and truth has still today remained unchallenged in its righteous steadfastness. He was righteous and his words and deeds speak to that fact one hundred fold. The only thing that speaks against these facts are Jewish propagated bull shit like the kind you are currently supporting. NOTHING from the man's words or deeds reflect this belief of being tied to the occult, in fact the polar opposite is quite easily observed.

Did the Rothschilds fund Hitler?
Was Hitler a practitioner of Jewish Occultism?
Was Hitler a Zionist?
Did Hitler help the Jews secretly while on the outside portraying himself to be their worst enemy?
Did Hitler belief in a 'Aryan only' Germany?
Did he belief in White supremacy? (maybe German yes, but White?)
Did Hitler wish world conquest for Germany?

Well?

When I personally study the man, and I'm not alone on this, I see no proof for any of the above, however if I turn on the History channel I can usually get my fill within an hour.

Hitler was an intelligent man approaching beyond belief, he was a no-nonsense man and stood for what is just and right. Everything else you have come to believe about him and Nazis is nothing but a product of a multifaceted Jewish smear campaign, the likes of which have not been seen since the days of Jesus (whom they are pretty much done with now).

So yeah perhaps getting the facts straight about that may be helpful for us, indeed even inspiring. But start pursuing the facts please. I dropped an audio in the Hitler thread, did you listen to it? That is Hitler that is known to honest biographers, to honest historians. It's really quite simple, he was the gentile's last great hope, and for being such he will now and forever have to face the wrath of the Jew and his massive propaganda machine.

So please when you read 'White pride' think of only that, not 'White supremacy'. Just as 'Black pride' does not equate to' Black supremacy'. Start there. Then when you hear the term 'Nationalism' do not think 'fascism'. When you hear 'race' do not instantly think 'racism'. Every race has something to be proud of, even the Jews do when they boast amongst themselves about how they duped us all . And when you here the 'occult', first laugh, then call bullocks. Cause it is! It's utterly powerless once it's exposed - and it will be again. None of the great minds of earth have ever bought into Jewish mysticism, and Hitler was no exception. Occult and Mysticism are for the devious, the corrupted, the cowardly and the low..not the great. And almost any man or woman in Hitler's Germany hardly saw him as anything but a great man, they were proud of him -they were not ashamed of him - and they were not stupid -unlike the majority of today's common western based citizen. :crazy:

And that's how I see it. I'm unlikely to change on that front as I am unlikely to change my opinion that we are all brothers in arms here. A good debate is healthy when it's clean.

mgt23 · November 05, 2012, 10:15:17 PM

QuoteJews and Nazis: one is the Sephiroth, the other is the Qlippoth. Both want their olam ha ba on Earth now, one headquartered in Jerusalem, the other in Atlantis. And you wonder why neo-Nazis only argue things like the Holocaust and the Talmud, while leaving the Kabbalah untouched. If Jews are the elephant in the room on a worldly scale, then the Kabbalah is the elephant in the Nazi's room.

........correct. It's why when I delved deeper into the new age scene I found that the Dark goddess' all believe in aryanism and Atlantis and manipulate DMT. I saw them working for rich jews in London. I see Lady Michelle Renouf married to banker, I see German jew Queeny's nazi sex fetish scene all obsessed with social breeding and working with livery companies under Rothschild control. The vatican's at it as well with the marrano jesuits, messing with the Zohar. You have a Female Jew ZOHAR (Land Title)DEATH CULT under Queeny. You then have a Male Jew ZOHAR (Land Title)DEATH CULT under the POPE. You then have a TALMUDIC JEW SEX AND MONEY(Commodities and currencies) CULT, pretending to fight it out with the other two cults since Constantine. Before Rothschild, they worked for the ZOHARITES after 1945 they came into the Ascendency and the externalization of the Heirachy began. The Zoharites now subjugated, work for the Talmudists and all I'm saying is that I want rid of ALL OF THEM.

What makes you think CSR that I should start working with Zoharites? Or that I'm a JEW if I don't?

I am Pro Gentile full stop. Technical Conspiracy Theory IS Revisionism.

QuoteI don't have much respect for people who think 'racism' is a real thing and not just the Jewish construct that it is. Race is real, yes this is true and I myself am all for racial pride but 'racism' is a vice with an agenda. Regardless of the race in question, racial pride is a good thing. The problem is with this invented construct of 'racism' (which really only means anti-white) is the stress and distrust it puts, rather introduces, on races. I've seen, for myself, in some of the most politically correct schools in the world the way races will act naturally. Give people the choice and freewill and they are likely to self segregate anyway, and there is nothing wrong with that - people (in general) are most comfortable with their own kin. It is this artificial construct of 'racism' that makes us all feel guilty for this natural self segregation, it's something we've always done and we still managed to have respect for one another, but now it carries a new (and fictional) burden. 'Racism' brings into the fold a completely new dynamic and one that is entirely unjust and certainly bias. There is nothing wrong with Black pride or Chinese pride, or Indian pride but look what happens when you say 'White pride' ...Do you see it? Immediately it's perceived (and by some in this very forum) that 'White pride' equates to 'White supremacy'... Why is that? Because 'racism ' is a construct used by the Jew to cause divide, hate and to target - first and foremost- their traditional enemy. Their most successful enemy. Stories of Hitler and the Aryan race also play into this, but again the real facts of history do not support this view, Hitler loved Germany first, yes, but he had no problem enlisting anyone else to serve in his cause -regardless of color- he didn't discriminate there. Biggest proof of this, by far, is the fact Japan allied with him. I mean what the hell where they thinking? If you believe this 'aryan race' bullshit card then how to you square that fact? So that line of the argument is for fools only - in my opinion. Careful and fair examination of the facts -FROM THE SORCE and not Jews reveals this to be true. It's doesn't take much digging neither. Hitler himself was not Aryan.... :crazy:

Rubbish. The SS ran the NSDAP and that was Pro Aryan but only on a regional level. Fuck Aryan and Jew Pride.

I am advocating GENTILE PRIDE in all its cultural rather than genetic diversity.

Quote'Mysticism' was another thing Hitler put no stock in, contrary to popular belief (and I mean propagated 'popular' belief) . Hitler went out of his way to destroy Cabbalist establishments almost from the get go. That on its face runs contrary to what you two are trying to sell here (just leave this argument to the Jew's, believe me they don't need any more help on this front - they already have the History channel). Hitler had a agenda to rid Germany of Masonic temples and Jewish mysticism. The only thing you can honestly link to him as far as the occult goes, is some of the symbology he choose to utilize for his campaign. And yes it's there, but many of these symbols have disputed origins and many are innocuous at best. Another fool's errand.

Now I'm admittedly not sighting from anything to make these two points above other than Hitler's own words and deeds... I still maintain that is the best source when trying to discover the truth about him -and national socialism.

.......again rubbish. Hitler concordat was with Lutheran Protestantism and Roman Catholicism. Both had been co opted by Marranno Jews from Portugal and Spain. Thats where Protestantism got its Zoharite leanings and you start to see Astrologers at Protestant Royal Courts. Marrano Jews did the same thing with JEW Ignatius Loyola and the Zohar penetrated and took over the Vatican after 1810 when they were allowed back in after being banned by the previous Pope. Hitler was of the "eye for an eye" school, in public speech, which is a mosaic Jew position and smacks of Zohar. In private towards the end of his life he showed reservations about Christianity's ability to beat the Jew.

QuoteNow as far as the 'occult' goes, and this question of Hitler being part of it and that in turn being very relevant in our current fight, ... well ... I can't see it. Not at all. The occult is rendered powerless with just a little exposer, something Hitler knew well...and he did expose it (and long before us). Magic itself is nothing more than illusion, and so is the occult... it's only power lies in its secrecy and illusion... it is not a formidable enemy at all -not against truth. Just do what Hitler did, shine the light on it for all to see and it erodes rapidly. Tell the truth and the lies fail - another thing Hitler knew well.

When I look at what Hitler did for Germany I see a gentile country that was finally liberated from Jewish occultic repression (albeit briefly). I see that things got very good for the people, a people who in turn admired (and loved) their leader. I see a nation brought back from the brink by a man who's pursuit of knowledge and truth has still today remained unchallenged in its righteous steadfastness. He was righteous and his words and deeds speak to that fact one hundred fold. The only thing that speaks against these facts are Jewish propagated bull shit like the kind you are currently supporting. NOTHING from the man's words or deeds reflect this belief of being tied to the occult, in fact the polar opposite is quite easily observed.

........missing the point. The main attack has always been leveled at the SS and Himmler/Boorman(Thule and Vril earlier). Hitlers main crime was not controlling the SS and favoring it over the Wehrmacht.

........perhaps CSR you should do a seance with:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Jan_Hanussen

QuoteErik Jan Hanussen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Erik Jan Hanussen, born Hermann Steinschneider (2 June 1889, Vienna – 25 March 1933, Berlin), was an Austrian Jewish publicist and clairvoyant performer who lied about his origins. Acclaimed in his lifetime as a hypnotist, mentalist, occultist, and astrologer, Hanussen was active in Weimar Republic Germany and also at the beginning of Nazi Germany. He is said to have instructed Adolf Hitler in performance and the achievement of dramatic effect.

Early years

Although Hanussen claimed to be a Danish aristocrat, he was in fact a Moravian Jew, born as Hermann Steinschneider.[citation needed] Hanussen's father, Siegfried Steinschneider (1858-1910), was an actor and caretaker of a synagogue who married Antonie Julie Kohn in Vienna, Austria.[citation needed]
Background

After World War I, Hanussen performed a mind reading, muscle reading, and hypnosis act at La Scala in Berlin that catapulted him to stardom. At his height, he enjoyed the company of Germany's military and business elite, also becoming close with members of the SA (Sturmabteilung) and lenders to them of large sums of money. It is claimed he was a supporter of the Nazis despite his Jewish ancestry, which was an open secret.

Stories abound of meetings between Hanussen and Hitler, including an encounter shortly before the election of November 1932, during which Hanussen taught Hitler his crowd control techniques of using gestures and dramatic pauses.[1]

Dr. Walter C. Langer, a psychoanalyst, prepared a psychological profile of Hitler for the Office of Strategic Services in 1943. The profile included a reference to Hanussen: "... during the early 1920's Hitler took regular lessons in speaking and in mass psychology from a man named Hamissen[2] who was also a practicing astrologer and fortune-teller. He was an extremely clever individual who taught Hitler a great deal concerning the importance of staging meetings to obtain the greatest dramatic effect."[3]

In 1931 Hanussen purchased a Breslau printing firm and began publishing an occult journal, Hanussen Magazin and Bunte Wochenschau, a popular biweekly Berlin tabloid which included astrological columns.[4] He used the proceeds from his publishing ventures and stage shows to purchase a mansion which became known as "The Palace of the Occult", which he renovated and turned into a luxurious interactive theatre for fortune telling games. Guests would sit around a large circular table and place their palms on glass with symbols lit from beneath; the room lights would be lowered in a séance-like fashion; and various gimmicks would highlight Hanussen's dramatic verbal presentation of prophecies to the guests. He predicted events in the lives of the individuals present, but controversy arose when he predicted the future of Germany. He became successful, was always in demand in various venues, and had a full-time valet.

Alfred Neubauer, a famous motor racing team manager, refers to Hanussen in his autobiography,'Speed Was My Life' (first published in English in 1960). In the chapter 'A Prophecy Comes True', he describes a prediction made by Hanussen before the race at AVUS in Germany in May 1932. While at the Roxy Bar with other drivers, Neubauer challenged Hanussen to predict the winner of the following day's race. After some 'leg pulling', Hanussen wrote two names on a piece of paper, which he folded, and put in an envelope. This was placed in the custody of the barman. He had strict instructions that it be left unopened until after the race. Hanussen announced, 'One of us at this table will win tomorrow, another will die. The two names are in this envelope.' During the race, drivers Prince Lobkowicz was killed, and Brauchitsch won. After the race, Neubauer states he opened the envelope and found those names inside. Several days later, a Berlin newspaper reported that Hanussen had urged the German Automobile Club to persuade Prince Lobkowicz not to take part in the race, but Club officials had taken no action.
Controversy and assassination

Predicting the Reichstag fire, a decisive event that allowed recently-appointed Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler to seize absolute power in 1933, was Hanussen's most famous feat of clairvoyance. It also was possibly a miscalculated use of inside information that led to his death shortly thereafter.

Eric Hanussen was assassinated on March 25, 1933[5], probably by a group of SA men, and was hastily buried in a field on the outskirts of Berlin, near Stahnsdorf.[6] He was potential competition to Hermann Göring and Joseph Goebbels for the attention of their Führer, which may also have led to his murder. Hanussen's body was discovered over a month later. There are unsubstantiated claims that he may have been involved in the Reichstag fire, hypnotizing and directing Marinus van der Lubbe, the convicted arsenist, to commit the act.[7]
Personal life

Hanussen's daughter, Erika Fuchs Steinschneider, was born to his first wife Theresia Luksch in 1920.[8] After their separation, Theresia resettled with her young daughter to Meran, Italy where Theresia eventually met, married, and later divorced a Mr. Fuchs, heir to a brewing company.

Hanussen was possibly survived by a son born in 1922 to a mistress. The son, Gerhard Belgardt, was placed in an orphanage and survived the war. He later gained some fame by performing as a clairvoyant calling himself Hanussen II.
See also

References

^ See generally John Toland, Adolf Hitler, p. 218, Anchor Books edition (1992), originally published by Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. (1976).
^ This is apparently a typographical error, since in the same sentence the name is subsequently spelled correctly two times as Hanussen. In the 1972 reprint of the document by New American Library, the name "Hanussen" is spelled correctly. See Walter C. Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler: The Secret Wartime Report, p. 40, New American Library (1972).
^ A Psychologial Profile of Adolph Hitler; see also Walter C. Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler: The Secret Wartime Report, p. 40, New American Library (1972).
^ Gordon, Mel: "Hitler's Jewish Psychic". "Guilt & Pleasure" (3). Roger Bennett, Summer 2006
^ Gordon, Mel: "Hanussen: Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant". Feral House, 2001, p. 249. ISBN 0922915687
^ John Toland, Adolf Hitler, p. 962, Anchor Books edition (1992), originally published by Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. (1976).
^ Gordon, Mel: "Hanussen: Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant". Feral House, 2001, p. 242
^ Steinschneider, Phil: Steinschneider Genealogy. Accessed 2008-02-13

Gordon, Mel (2001). Hanussen: Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant. Feral House. ISBN 0-922915-68-7.
Gordon, Mel (Summer 2006). "Hitler's Jewish Psychic". Guilt & Pleasure (Roger Bennett) (3). Retrieved 2008-02-14.
Steinschneider, Phil. "Steinschneider Genealogy". Retrieved 2008-02-13.

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 05, 2012, 11:31:15 PM

Mgt23... Mel Gordon is a flaming faggot not worth a second of your time to listen to. This is just a fag fantasy Mgt23. If there was a shred of truth to it, it would have been mentioned in "The Coming of the Third Reich" by Richard Evans since he covers the Weimer "age" in Germany in depth and detail...moreover, EVANS DOCUMENTS ALL OF HIS FINDINGS instead of relying on some fag's gossipy rants like Mel Gordon Also, this information was never mentioned in any of David Irving's works on Hitler. --CSR
-----------

QuoteVoluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin (Expanded Edition)

Mel Gordon

Feral House, May 1, 2006 - 300 pages

"Voluptuous Panic is simultaneously appalling and thrilling, repellent and seductive, grotesque and gorgeous—not a typical coffee table book. It would go better with absinthe drunk from a human skull."—Gary Meyer, Clean Sheets

When Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin first appeared in the fall of 2000, it inspired wide acclaim and multiple printings. Anticipating the expanded edition, Feral House placed Voluptuous Panic out of print, and for the past year buyers paid as much as $460 to online dealers for a used copy.

This sourcebook of hundreds of rare visual delights from pre-Nazi, Cabaret-period "Babylon on the Spree" has the distinction of being praised both by scholars and avatars of contemporary culture, inspiring hip clubgoers, filmmakers, gay historians, graphic designers, and musicians like the Dresden Dolls and Marilyn Manson.

Voluptuous Panic's expanded edition includes the new illustrated chapter, "Sex Magic and the Occult," documenting German pagan cults and their bizarre erotic rituals, including instructions for entering into the "Sexual Fourth Dimension." The deluxe hardcover edition also includes sensational accounts of hypno-erotic cabaret acts, Berlin Fetish prostitution ("The Boot Girl Visit"), gay life ("A Wild-Boy Initiation!"), descriptions and illustrations of Aleister Crowley's Berlin OTO Secret Society, and sex crime ("the Curious Career and Untimely Death of Fritz Ulbrich").

Mel Gordon is professor of Theater at University of California, Berkeley, and also the author of Erik Jan Hanussen: Hitler's Jewish Clairvoyant (Feral House), and The Grand Guignol: Theatre of Fear and Terror (DaCapo).

http://books.google.com/books/about/Vol ... EfDGj7G_QC

----------

Here is Wolf-Heinrich Graf von Helldorf's story... he actually closed down the "Fag Theatre" and burned what is today San Francisco in Weimer Germany. Looks like a partially corrupt German man who just confiscated Jew money.

He is mentioned in this article which is clearly inaccurate "Faggy-Jew Sh*te". He probably pissed them off by closing down their faggoty-crap so they made up stories.

http://www.guiltandpleasure.com/index.p ... cle&id=101

-----------------

QuoteWolf-Heinrich Graf von Helldorf

Wolf-Heinrich Graf von Helldorf (14 October 1896 – 15 August 1944) was a German police official and politician, who served as a Member of the Prussian Parliament during the Weimar Republic, as a Member of the German Parliament for the Nazi Party from 1933 and as president of police in Potsdam and Berlin. From 1938, he became associated with the anti-Nazi resistance, and was executed in 1944 for his role in the 20th July plot to overthrow Hitler's regime.
Contents

Early life

Helldorf was born in Merseburg, a landowner's son, Helldorf served as a lieutenant from 1915 in the First World War. He was a member of the Prussian Parliament from 1924 to 1928 and in 1932.

Berlin chief of police

Already by 1931, he had joined the SA, and functioned as an SA leader in Berlin. The scope of his work got bigger in 1933 when he was also given responsibility for the SS's Berlin-Brandenburg leadership. At the same time, he was also elected to the Reichstag.

In March of the same year, he was named Police President of Potsdam, and from July 1935, he took on the same function in Berlin, a post in which he remained for the last decade of his life. Helldorf, an inveterate gambler, was notorious for arresting wealthy Jews, seizing their passports and then extorting huge bribes from them to secure their release and exit from Germany.

He was closely allied with Dr Joseph Goebbels, Gauleiter of Berlin and Minister for Propaganda and Public Enlightenment. As chief of the Berlin Police, Helldorf played an instrumental role in the harassment and plundering of Berlin's Jewish population in the early and mid 1930s. Joseph Goebbels mentioned in his diary on 2 July 1938, that "...Helldorf wants to construct a Jewish ghetto in Berlin. The rich Jews will be required to fund its construction." Helldorf was the organisational brains behind the arson and looting of Berlin's synagogues and Jewish businesses in the Kristallnacht pogroms of November 1938.

Helldorf used his office for personal enrichment. In the Blomberg-Fritsch Affair, he first withheld from the top Nazi leadership evidence which contradicted the Gestapo's assertion that Werner von Blomberg's new wife had a criminal record for posing for pornograhic photos, then later leaked to the Wehrmacht leadership the same exculpatory evidence to create the implication that it had been in the possession of but withheld by the Gestapo. Similarly in the Fritsch affair, Helldorf possessed documentary information that would have exonerated Fritsch from the allegations that Fritsch paid for the services of homosexual prostitutes, it was a cavalry captain with a similar surname. After Fritsch's consequent dismissal as Commander in Chief of the Army, Helldorf then leaked to the army leadership the misidentification upon which Fritsch had been framed and disgraced.

20 July Plot

From 1938, it is asserted that Helldorf was in some form of communication with the military opposition to Hitler.[1] This is especially the case in Hans Gisevius' book "To the Bitter End", in which Helldorf plays an important role in Gisevius' circle of conspirators and anti-Nazis.

On 20 July 1944, he was in communication with the coup d'état plotters. His place was to command his Berlin police during the coup, first to not interfere with the military takeover, then to aid the new government.[2]

The fact that Helldorf sided with the anti-Hitler movement in their attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler earned him a place in history as a German resistance fighter against the Nazi régime.

Trial and execution

For his participation in the 20 July plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler at the Wolf's Lair in East Prussia, he was condemned by Roland Freisler at the Volksgerichtshof and later put to death at Plötzensee Prison. So enraged was Hitler at his participation in the plot that Hitler ordered that he be forced to watch all others hanged before him and then hanged last.
Notes and sources

^ Ted Harrison: "Alter Kämpfer" im Widerstand. Graf Helldorff, die NS-Bewegung und die Opposition gegen Hitler. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 45(1997) (PDF, 6,5 MB), p. 385-423.
^ See Gisevius' book, Part Two, section 3, "Too Late – 20 July 1944"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf-Heinr ... n_Helldorf

This site has the Jew mystic's biography... he gave money to Helldorf as payoffs:

http://www.steinschneider.com/biography ... /page2.htm

mgt23 · November 05, 2012, 11:44:16 PM

............whilst attacking one of the sources on Jewapedia, my argument still stands and you have completely ignored my argument in the previous post as to the generic nature of the dialectic. If protestantism and roman Catholicism were co opted and Hitler was doing deals with them, whilst sucking British Royal Jew cock. Then the NSDAP de facto was co opted. In fact you have not gone through my argument and knocked them down one by one. Instead all you have done is throw slander at my ideas "a wandering thread", "DMT wild theories" and other generic bollox. I have an advantage over you..........I spent two years counter infiltrating those pricks. I know all there dirty secrets and the fact remains they are new age neo nazis and are masonic and work for jew moneymen, specifically CHABAD. So fuck you, i cant stand mental weaklings like you. Try infiltrating for once, you might actually learn something, rather than read qlippoth books and eating pork pies.

Also the more I think of Nazi babies, of SS soldiers fucking women so they can have babies, reminds me of a sex cult. Rather than each man and women finding each true love settling down and starting a family. I say again the SS were a sex cult behind the scenes. Fuck em and you should fuck off from TIU if you are advocating Revivalism rather than Revisionism.

CrackSmokeRepublican · November 06, 2012, 12:17:46 AM

Quote from: "mgt23"............whilst attacking one of the sources on Jewapedia, my argument still stands and you have completely ignored my argument in the previous post as to the generic nature of the dialectic. If protestantism and roman Catholicism were co opted and Hitler was doing deals with them, whilst sucking British Royal Jew cock. Then the NSDAP de facto was co opted. In fact you have not gone through my argument and knocked them down one by one. Instead all you have done is throw slander at my ideas "a wandering thread", "DMT wild theories" and other generic bollox. I have an advantage over you..........I spent two years counter infiltrating those pricks. I know all there dirty secrets and the fact remains they are new age neo nazis and are masonic and work for jew moneymen, specifically CHABAD. So fuck you, i cant stand mental weaklings like you. Try infiltrating for once, you might actually learn something, rather than read qlippoth books and eating pork pies.

Also the more I think of Nazi babies, of SS soldiers fucking women so they can have babies, reminds me of a sex cult. Rather than each man and women finding each true love settling down and starting a family. I say again the SS were a sex cult behind the scenes. Fuck em and you should fuck off from TIU if you are advocating Revivalism rather than Revisionism.

Look... there is no connection between the German Army-Nazis and the Kabballah/masons/fags/etc. It isn't in the history books. I think you have some interesting finds Mgt23 and give some credibility to the "reptilians" in a novel way, but what you are looking at isn't connected with "Hitler-SS-Nazis" despite what you and Tim patting each other on the back ---think. The SS was a military organization first and foremost -- not a sex cult.

http://historyimages.blogspot.com/2011/ ... g-ww2.html

Timothy_Fitzpatrick · November 06, 2012, 04:46:34 AM

Quote from: "CrackSmokeRepublican"
Quote from: "mgt23"............whilst attacking one of the sources on Jewapedia, my argument still stands and you have completely ignored my argument in the previous post as to the generic nature of the dialectic. If protestantism and roman Catholicism were co opted and Hitler was doing deals with them, whilst sucking British Royal Jew cock. Then the NSDAP de facto was co opted. In fact you have not gone through my argument and knocked them down one by one. Instead all you have done is throw slander at my ideas "a wandering thread", "DMT wild theories" and other generic bollox. I have an advantage over you..........I spent two years counter infiltrating those pricks. I know all there dirty secrets and the fact remains they are new age neo nazis and are masonic and work for jew moneymen, specifically CHABAD. So fuck you, i cant stand mental weaklings like you. Try infiltrating for once, you might actually learn something, rather than read qlippoth books and eating pork pies.

Also the more I think of Nazi babies, of SS soldiers fucking women so they can have babies, reminds me of a sex cult. Rather than each man and women finding each true love settling down and starting a family. I say again the SS were a sex cult behind the scenes. Fuck em and you should fuck off from TIU if you are advocating Revivalism rather than Revisionism.

Look... there is no connection between the German Army-Nazis and the Kabballah/masons/fags/etc. It isn't in the history books. I think you have some interesting finds Mgt23 and give some credibility to the "reptilians" in a novel way, but what you are looking at isn't connected with "Hitler-SS-Nazis" despite what you and Tim patting each other on the back ---think. The SS was a military organization first and foremost -- not a sex cult.

http://historyimages.blogspot.com/2011/ ... g-ww2.html

Rationalized denial and strawman arguments.

mgt23 · November 06, 2012, 07:18:49 AM

[youtube:2hwh3k52]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exWUeQ53ICg[/youtube]2hwh3k52]

..........JEW DAUGHTER ZEENA LA VEY SAYING AT 2:13 "Christian baptism is cleansing the child of the original sin"

TRANSLATION.............Pour cold water over the child's head. Cold water releases naturally occurring DMT in spinal fluid. Said DMT removes any negative energy thoughtform memory qurinas that every child has after being separated from the mother after birth.

Now if a JEW satanist is saying this CSR and you continuing to deny my theory I'm going to start getting angry with you and come out against you. I might even start to challenge you on air to a debate. The evidence is on my side.

mgt23 · November 06, 2012, 08:30:04 AM

I repeat my point for "Posterity" as you would put it. If Protestantism was corrupted after they fled Elizabeth the First to Holland by Dutch Jews, who were marrano Jews from Portugal; and Roman Catholicism was corrupted by Jesuit marrano Jews from Spain under Ignatius Loyala. Then does it follow that de facto under the NSDAP concordant with Lutherans and Roman Catholics, the NSDAP was also corrupted by the Qlippoth. Was this the reason why the NSDAP followed Blavatsky and started to run around Tibet........rather than returning to Gaelic Christianity? It explains people like JAM, like IAN PAISLEY and Jesuit enforcement of the destruction of Gaelic Christianity and the Vatican 2 council where the Roman Catholics now say that the JEWS have their own covenant. That the Holohoax is true and the Pope word is now infallible (As far as I'm aware only Christs word or God's direct revelation is).

Why did Hitler(and in the main attack the SS) not return to Gaelic Christianity of the Byzantine model(or even better immediate pre-byzantine)?

............again the imagery of the hunted DEER(symbolic of Christ)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantin ... h_saint%29

QuoteConstantine (British saint)

Saint Constantine is the name of one or many British or Pictish saints.

Identification

South-west Britain

A Saint Constantine is revered in Devon and Cornwall. Based purely on similarity of a common name, some have identified him with the monarch Constantine of Dumnonia, despite the latter's condemnation for immoral behaviour by Gildas. If this is correct, he must have mended his ways.[1] He gives his name to the parish church of Milton Abbot in Devon and the villages of Constantine and Constantine Bay in Cornwall, also extinct chapels in Illogan and Dunterton. The saint at Constantine Bay was almost certainly the 'wealthy man' of this name mentioned in the Life of Saint Petroc. He was converted to Christianity by that holy man at nearby Little Petherick after the deer Constantine was hunting took shelter with him. A Constantine "King of the Cornishmen" also appears in the Life of Saint David as having given up his crown in order to enter this saint's monastery at St David's.[2]

Scotland and Ireland

The conversion of a Constantine is recorded in the Annals of Ulster in 588 and a Constantine appears in the Breviary of Aberdeen as entering a monastery in Ireland incognito before joining Saint Mungo (alias Kentigern) and becoming a missionary to the Picts. He was martyred in Scotland about 576[2] and John of Fordun tells how he was buried at Govan (where his shrine can still be seen today). Although revered on the same day as the Cornishman, the date has probably been transferred from one to the other. The Life of Saint Kentigern names a Constantine as the son and successor Riderch Hael, king of Alt Clut, later known as Strathclyde.[3]
Veneration
Constantine, in Kerrier: the 15th century Church, dedicated to Saint Constantine

South-west Britain

The cult of Saint Constantine (of Dumnonia) centred on the two places bearing his name, both of which may have originally supported monastic establishments.[4] The ruined chapel at Constantine Bay also has a nearby holy well (uncovered in 1911). Taking the waters there was said to bring rain during dry weather. The chapel's splendid font is now in the parish church at St Merryn. The name of the village of Constantine is recorded as Sanctus Constantinus in the Domesday Book. However, the monasteries seem to have declined into parish churches, after the Norman Conquest. The present Kerrier building is 15th century and bears no remnants of Constantinist iconography. The saint's day is generally celebrated on 9 March. An annual "Feast" is held in the village of Constantine, on the Sunday nearest to 9 March.
References

^ Since there were distinct tribes named Dumnonii in the South West and in Scotland it it is only highly probable that Gildas writes about the South-western one.
^ a b (Greek) Ὁ Ἅγιος Κωνσταντίνος ὁ Μάρτυρας βασιλέας τῶν Σκώτων. 9 Μαΐου. ΜΕΓΑΣ ΣΥΝΑΞΑΡΙΣΤΗΣ.
^ Clarkson, Tim (Winter 1999). "Rhydderch Hael". The Heroic Age 1 (2). Retrieved 12 August 2009.
^ However, Dr. Lynette Olson (1989) has challenged Charles Henderson's assertion (Henderson 1937) that there was a monastic establishment at Constantine, Kerrier, Cornwall.

Sources

Henderson, Charles (d. 1933); G. H. Doble (editor) (1937). A history of the parish of Constantine in Cornwall. Truro: Royal Institution of Cornwall. pp. 42–43 and footnote.
Doble, G. H. (1962). The Saints of Cornwall Vol. 2: saints of the Lizard district. Dean & Chapter of Truro, pp. 15–24.
Geoffrey of Monmouth; Thorpe, Lewis (translator) (1966). The History of the Kings of Britain. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-044170-0.
Olson, Lynette (1989). Early monasteries in Cornwall (Studies in Celtic History series). Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press. ISBN 0-85115-478-6.
Orme, Nicholas (2000) The Saints of Cornwall. Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-820765-4

........here we have the British Israel conflagration of the byzantine Constantine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_%28Briton%29

QuoteConstantine (Briton)

Constantine /ˈkɒnstəntaɪn/ was a minor king in 6th-century sub-Roman Britain, who was remembered in later British tradition as a legendary King of Britain. The only contemporary information about him comes from Gildas, who calls him king of Damnonia (probably Dumnonia) and castigates him for his various sins, including the murder of two "royal youths" inside a church. Much later, Geoffrey of Monmouth included the figure in his pseudohistorical chronicle Historia Regum Britanniae, adding fictional details to Gildas' account and making Constantine the successor to King Arthur as King of Britain. Under the influence of Geoffrey, derivative figures appeared in a number of later works.

Additionally, several churches and chapels in Southwestern Britain and elsewhere were dedicated to a "Saint Constantine", who was generally held to have been a king. While these do not all necessarily refer to the same person, at least some of them appear to reflect back to Gildas' Constantine.
History

Gildas mentions Constantine in chapters 28 and 29 of his 6th-century work De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae.[1][2] He is one of five Brythonic kings whom the author rebukes and compares to Biblical beasts. Constantine is called the "tyrannical whelp of the unclean lioness of Damnonia", a reference to the books of Daniel and Revelation, and apparently also a slur directed at his mother. This Damnonia is generally associated with the kingdom of Dumnonia, a Brythonic kingdom in Southwestern Britain.[3] However, it is possible that Gildas was instead referring to the territory of the Damnonii in what was later known as the Hen Ogledd or "Old North".

Gildas says that despite swearing an oath against deceit and tyranny, Constantine disguised himself in an abbot's robes and attacked two "royal youths" praying before a church altar, killing them and their companions. Gildas is clear that Constantine's sins were manifold even before this, as he had committed "many adulteries" after casting off his lawfully wedded wife. Gildas encourages Constantine, whom he knows to still be alive at the time, to repent his sins lest he be damned.[1][2]
Saint Constantine
Main article: Constantine (British saint)

The historical Constantine of Dumnonia may have influenced later traditions, known in Southwestern Britain as well as in Wales, Ireland, and Scotland, about a Saint Constantine who is usually said to have been a king who gave up his crown to become a monk. The Cornish and Welsh traditions especially may have been influenced by Gildas' screed, in particular his adjuration for Constantine to repent; the belief may have been that the reproach eventually worked.[4]

The two major centers for the cultus of Saint Constantine were the church in Constantine Parish and the Chapel of Saint Constantine in St Merryn Parish (now Constantine Bay), both in Cornwall.[4] The former was established by at least the 11th century, as it is mentioned in Rhygyfarch's 11th-century Life of Saint David. At this time it may have supported a clerical community, but in later centuries it became simply a parish church. The Chapel at Constantine Bay had a holy well, and was the center of its own sub-parish.[4]

The Annales Cambriae (Welsh Annals) and the Annals of Ulster record the conversion of a certain Constantine; these may be a reference to the Cornish saint and therefore to the historical figure.[4] A number of subsequent texts refer to Constantine, generally associating him with Cornwall, often specifically as its king. The Life of Saint David says that Constantine, King of Cornwall gave up his crown and joined Saint David's monastery at Menevia. The Vitae Petroci includes an episode in which Saint Petroc protects a stag being hunted by a wealthy man named Constantine, who eventually converts and becomes a monk. Here Constantine is not said to be king, but a 12th-century text referring to this story, the Miracula, specifically names him as such, further adding that he gave Petroc an ivory horn upon his conversion which became one of the saint's chief relics.[5] These references are only a few to the various shadowy saints and kings named Constantine attested across Britain, and suggests a confusion and conflation of various figures.[6]

Other sites in Southwestern Britain associated with Constantine or others of that name include the church of Milton Abbot, Devon; a chapel in nearby Dunterton, Devon, and another chapel in Illogan, Cornwall. The two Devon sites may have been dedicated instead to Constantine the Great, as the church in nearby Abbotsham was, like Milton Abbot, subject to Tavistock Abbey, dedicated to Helena of Constantinople, Constantine the Great's mother.[4] In Wales, two churches were dedicated to Constantine: Llangystennin (in Conwy) and Welsh Bicknor (now in Herefordshire, England).[4] The church in Govan in present-day Scotland was also dedicated to a Saint Constantine.[7]
Later traditions

Geoffrey of Monmouth includes Constantine in a section of his Historia Regum Britanniae adapted from Gildas, in which the reproved kings are made successors, rather than contemporaries as in De Excidio. Here, Constantine is the son of King Arthur's kinsman Cador, Duke of Cornwall, and is made king following Arthur's death at the Battle of Camlann. Geoffrey identifies Gildas' "royal youths" with the two sons of Mordred, who, along with their Saxon allies, continue their father's insurrection after his death. After "many battles" Constantine routs the rebels, and Mordred's sons flee to London and Winchester, where they hide in a church and a friary, respectively. Constantine hunts them down and executes them before the altars of their sanctuaries. Divine retribution for this transgression comes three years later when he is killed by his nephew Aurelius Conanus (Gildas' Aurelius Caninus), precipitating a civil war. He is buried at Stonehenge alongside other kings of Britain.[8]

A figure named Custennin Gorneu (Constantine of Cornwall) appears in the genealogies of the kings of Dumnonia. The hero Geraint of Dumnonia is said to be the grandson of Custennin in the Bonedd y Saint, the prose romance Geraint and Enid, and after emendation, the genealogies in Jesus College MS 20.[9][10] Geoffrey evidently knew the Dumnonian genealogy in essentially this form, though he is the first to identify Gildas' Constantine as a son of Cador, known in Welsh tradition as Cadwy mab Geraint.[9]

Geoffrey's version of Constantine was included in the various later adaptations of the Historia, which were widely regarded as authentic in the Middle Ages. These include Wace's Anglo-Norman Roman de Brut and the Welsh Brut y Brenhinedd. He does not figure strongly in the romance traditions, though he does appear as Arthur's successor in the 14th-century English alliterative poem known as the Alliterative Morte Arthure, as well as Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, in sections adapted from the Alliterative Morte. He also features in some modern treatments of the legend, such as the 1990 computer game Spirit of Excalibur, in which he is the chief protagonist.
Notes

^ a b De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, ch. 28–29.
^ a b Giles, pp. 24–26.
^ Lloyd, pp. 131–132.
^ a b c d e f Orme, pp. 95–96.
^ Jankulak, p. 17.
^ Bromwich, pp. 318–319, discusses the confusion of some of these various Constantines. Notable in the context of "Saint" Constantine is Custennin Vendigeit (The Blessed), the name for the historical usurper Constantine III in the Welsh Triads.
^ Clarkson 1999.
^ Historia Regum Britanniae, ch. 2–4.
^ a b Bromwich, pp. 318–319; 356–360.
^ Geraint and Enid.

References

Bromwich, Rachel (2006). Trioedd Ynys Prydein: The Triads of the Island of Britain. University Of Wales Press. ISBN 0-7083-1386-8.
Clarkson, Tim (Winter 1999). "Rhydderch Hael". The Heroic Age 1 (2). Retrieved September 15, 2010.
Giles, John Allen, ed. (1841), The Works of Gildas and Nennius, London: James Bohn — English translation
Giles, John Allen, ed. (1847), History of the Ancient Britons, II (Second ed.), Oxford: W. Baxter (published 1854)
Jankulak, Karen (2000). The Medieval Cult of St Petroc. Boydell & Brewer. ISBN 0-85115-777-7. Retrieved January 6, 2010.
Lloyd, John Edward (1912). A History of Wales from the Earliest Times to the Edwardian Conquest. Longmans, Green, and Co.. Retrieved January 6, 2010.
Orme, Nicholas (2000). The Saints of Cornwall. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-820765-4. Retrieved September 15, 2010.

........and for the sake of completeness.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great

QuoteConstantine the Great

Constantine
57th Emperor of the Roman Empire

Head of Constantine's colossal statue at the Capitoline Museums. The original statue of marble was acrolithic with the torso consisting of a cuirass in bronze.[1]
Reign    25 July 306 AD – 29 October 312 AD[notes 1]
29 October 312 – 19 September 324[notes 2]
19 September 324 – 22 May 337[notes 3]
Full name    Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus
Born    27 February ca. 272[2]
Birthplace    Naissus, Moesia Superior, Present day Serbia
Died    22 May 337 (aged 65)
Place of death    Nicomedia
Predecessor    Constantius I
Successor    Constantine II
Constantius II
Constans I
Consort    Minervina, died or divorced before 307
Fausta
Offspring    Constantina
Helena
Crispus
Constantine II
Constantius II
Constans
Dynasty    Constantinian dynasty
Father    Constantius Chlorus
Mother    Helena
Part of a series on
Christianity
Christians hold Jesus to be the Christ.
Jesus · Christ[show]
Bible and Foundations[show]
Theology[show]
History and tradition[show]
General topics[show]
Groups[show]

Portal icon Christianity portal

v
t
e

Constantine the Great (Latin: Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus;[3] c. 27 February 272[2] – 22 May 337), also known as Constantine I or Saint Constantine,[4] was Roman Emperor from 306 to 337. Well known for being the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity,[notes 4] Constantine and co-Emperor Licinius issued the Edict of Milan in 313, which proclaimed tolerance of all religions throughout the empire.

Constantine defeated the emperors Maxentius and Licinius during civil wars. He also fought successfully against the Franks, Alamanni, Visigoths, and Sarmatians during his reign — even resettling parts of Dacia which had been abandoned during the previous century. Constantine built a new imperial residence at Byzantium, naming it New Rome. However, in Constantine's honor, people called it Constantinople, which would later be the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire for over one thousand years. Because of this, he is thought of as the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire.
Contents

1 Sources
2 Early life
2.1 In the East
2.2 In the West
3 Early rule
3.1 Maxentius' rebellion
3.2 Maximian's rebellion
4 Civil wars
4.1 War against Maxentius
4.1.1 Constantine's army adopts the Christian cross
4.2 In Rome
4.3 Wars against Licinius
5 Later rule
5.1 Foundation of Constantinople
5.2 Religious policy
5.3 Administrative reforms
5.4 Monetary reforms
5.5 Executions of Crispus and Fausta
5.6 Later campaigns
5.7 Sickness and death
6 Legacy
6.1 Historiography
6.2 Donation of Constantine
6.3 Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia
7 Constantine in popular culture
8 See also
9 References
9.1 Ancient sources
9.2 Modern sources
10 Notes
11 Citations
12 Further reading
13 External links

Sources

Constantine was a ruler of major historical importance, and he has always been a controversial figure.[6] The fluctuations in Constantine's reputation reflect the nature of the ancient sources for his reign. These are abundant and detailed,[7] but have been strongly influenced by the official propaganda of the period,[8] and are often one-sided.[9] There are no surviving histories or biographies dealing with Constantine's life and rule.[10] The nearest replacement is Eusebius of Caesarea's Vita Constantini, a work that is a mixture of eulogy and hagiography.[11] Written between 335 and circa 339,[12] the Vita extols Constantine's moral and religious virtues.[13] The Vita creates a contentiously positive image of Constantine,[14] and modern historians have frequently challenged its reliability.[15] The fullest secular life of Constantine is the anonymous Origo Constantini.[16] A work of uncertain date,[17] the Origo focuses on military and political events, to the neglect of cultural and religious matters.[18]

Lactantius' De Mortibus Persecutorum, a political Christian pamphlet on the reigns of Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, provides valuable but tendentious detail on Constantine's predecessors and early life.[19] The ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret describe the ecclesiastic disputes of Constantine's later reign.[20] Written during the reign of Theodosius II (408–50), a century after Constantine's reign, these ecclesiastic historians obscure the events and theologies of the Constantinian period through misdirection, misrepresentation and deliberate obscurity.[21] The contemporary writings of the orthodox Christian Athanasius and the ecclesiastical history of the Arian Philostorgius also survive, though their biases are no less firm.[22]

The epitomes of Aurelius Victor (De Caesaribus), Eutropius (Breviarium), Festus (Breviarium), and the anonymous author of the Epitome de Caesaribus offer compressed secular political and military histories of the period. Although not Christian, the epitomes paint a favorable image of Constantine, but omit reference to Constantine's religious policies.[23] The Panegyrici Latini, a collection of panegyrics from the late third and early fourth centuries, provide valuable information on the politics and ideology of the tetrarchic period and the early life of Constantine.[24] Contemporary architecture, like the Arch of Constantine in Rome and palaces in Gamzigrad and Córdoba,[25] epigraphic remains, and the coinage of the era complement the literary sources.[26]
Early life
Constantine's parents and siblings. Dates in square brackets indicate the possession of minor titles, like "Caesar".
The remains of luxurious residence palace of Mediana, which was erected by Constantine I near his birth town of Naissus.

Flavius Valerius Constantinus, as he was originally named, was born in the city of Naissus, Dardania province of Moesia, in present-day Niš, Serbia, on 27 February of an uncertain year,[27] probably near 272.[28] His father was Flavius Constantius, a native of Dardania province of Moesia (later Dacia Ripensis).[29] Constantius was a tolerant and politically skilled man.[30] Constantine probably spent little time with his father.[31] Constantius was an officer in the Roman army in 272, part of the Emperor Aurelian's imperial bodyguard. Constantius advanced through the ranks, earning the governorship of Dalmatia from Emperor Diocletian, another of Aurelian's companions from Illyricum, in 284 or 285.[29] Constantine's mother was Helena, a Bithynian woman of low social standing.[32] It is uncertain whether she was legally married to Constantius or merely his concubine.[33]

In July 285, Diocletian declared Maximian, another colleague from Illyricum, his co-emperor. Each emperor would have his own court, his own military and administrative faculties, and each would rule with a separate praetorian prefect as chief lieutenant.[34] Maximian ruled in the West, from his capitals at Mediolanum (Milan, Italy) or Augusta Treverorum (Trier, Germany), while Diocletian ruled in the East, from Nicomedia (İzmit, Turkey). The division was merely pragmatic: the Empire was called "indivisible" in official panegyric,[35] and both emperors could move freely throughout the Empire.[36] In 288, Maximian appointed Constantius to serve as his praetorian prefect in Gaul. Constantius left Helena to marry Maximian's stepdaughter Theodora in 288 or 289.[37]

Diocletian divided the Empire again in 293, appointing two Caesars (junior emperors) to rule over further subdivisions of East and West. Each would be subordinate to their respective Augustus (senior emperor) but would act with supreme authority in his assigned lands. This system would later be called the Tetrarchy. Diocletian's first appointee for the office of Caesar was Constantius; his second was Galerius, a native of Felix Romuliana. According to Lactantius, Galerius was a brutal, animalistic man. Although he shared the paganism of Rome's aristocracy, he seemed to them an alien figure, a semi-barbarian.[38] On 1 March, Constantius was promoted to the office of Caesar, and dispatched to Gaul to fight the rebels Carausius and Allectus.[39] In spite of meritocratic overtones, the Tetrarchy retained vestiges of hereditary privilege,[40] and Constantine became the prime candidate for future appointment as Caesar as soon as his father took the position. Constantine went to the court of Diocletian, where he lived as his father's heir presumptive.[41]
In the East

Constantine received a formal education at Diocletian's court, where he learned Latin literature, Greek, and philosophy.[42] The cultural environment in Nicomedia was open, fluid and socially mobile, and Constantine could mix with intellectuals both pagan and Christian. He may have attended the lectures of Lactantius, a Christian scholar of Latin in the city.[43] Because Diocletian did not completely trust Constantius — none of the Tetrarchs fully trusted their colleagues — Constantine was held as something of a hostage, a tool to ensure Constantius' best behaviour. Constantine was nonetheless a prominent member of the court: he fought for Diocletian and Galerius in Asia, and served in a variety of tribunates; he campaigned against barbarians on the Danube in 296, and fought the Persians under Diocletian in Syria (297) and under Galerius in Mesopotamia (298–99).[44] By late 305, he had become a tribune of the first order, a tribunus ordinis primi.[45]

Constantine had returned to Nicomedia from the eastern front by the spring of 303, in time to witness the beginnings of Diocletian's "Great Persecution", the most severe persecution of Christians in Roman history.[46] In late 302, Diocletian and Galerius sent a messenger to the oracle of Apollo at Didyma with an inquiry about Christians.[47] Constantine could recall his presence at the palace when the messenger returned, when Diocletian accepted his court's demands for universal persecution.[48] On 23 February 303, Diocletian ordered the destruction of Nicomedia's new church, condemned its scriptures to the flames, and had its treasures seized. In the months that followed, churches and scriptures were destroyed, Christians were deprived of official ranks, and priests were imprisoned.[49]
Head from a statue of Diocletian, Augustus of the East

It is unlikely that Constantine played any role in the persecution.[50] In his later writings he would attempt to present himself as an opponent of Diocletian's "sanguinary edicts" against the "worshippers of God",[51] but nothing indicates that he opposed it effectively at the time.[52] Although no contemporary Christian challenged Constantine for his inaction during the persecutions, it remained a political liability throughout his life.[53]

On 1 May 305, Diocletian, as a result of a debilitating sickness taken in the winter of 304–5, announced his resignation. In a parallel ceremony in Milan, Maximian did the same.[54] Lactantius states that Galerius manipulated the weakened Diocletian into resigning, and forced him to accept Galerius' allies in the imperial succession. According to Lactantius, the crowd listening to Diocletian's resignation speech believed, until the very last moment, that Diocletian would choose Constantine and Maxentius (Maximian's son) as his successors.[55] It was not to be: Constantius and Galerius were promoted to Augusti, while Severus and Maximin were appointed their Caesars respectively. Constantine and Maxentius were ignored.[56]

Some of the ancient sources detail plots that Galerius made on Constantine's life in the months following Diocletian's abdication. They assert that Galerius assigned Constantine to lead an advance unit in a cavalry charge through a swamp on the middle Danube, made him enter into single combat with a lion, and attempted to kill him in hunts and wars. Constantine always emerged victorious: the lion emerged from the contest in a poorer condition than Constantine; Constantine returned to Nicomedia from the Danube with a Sarmatian captive to drop at Galerius' feet.[57] It is uncertain how much these tales can be trusted.[58]
In the West

Constantine recognized the implicit danger in remaining at Galerius' court, where he was held as a virtual hostage. His career depended on being rescued by his father in the west. Constantius was quick to intervene.[59] In the late spring or early summer of 305, Constantius requested leave for his son, to help him campaign in Britain. After a long evening of drinking, Galerius granted the request. Constantine's later propaganda describes how Constantine fled the court in the night, before Galerius could change his mind. He rode from post-house to post-house at high speed, hamstringing every horse in his wake.[60] By the time Galerius awoke the following morning, Constantine had fled too far to be caught.[61] Constantine joined his father in Gaul, at Bononia (Boulogne) before the summer of 305.[62]
Bronze statue of Constantine I in York, England, near the spot where he was proclaimed Augustus in 306

From Bononia they crossed the Channel to Britain and made their way to Eboracum (York), capital of the province of Britannia Secunda and home to a large military base. Constantine was able to spend a year in northern Britain at his father's side, campaigning against the Picts beyond Hadrian's Wall in the summer and autumn.[63] Constantius's campaign, like that of Septimius Severus before it, probably advanced far into the north without achieving great success.[64] Constantius had become severely sick over the course of his reign, and died on 25 July 306 in Eboracum (York). Before dying, he declared his support for raising Constantine to the rank of full Augustus. The Alamannic king Chrocus, a barbarian taken into service under Constantius, then proclaimed Constantine as Augustus. The troops loyal to Constantius' memory followed him in acclamation. Gaul and Britain quickly accepted his rule;[65] Iberia, which had been in his father's domain for less than a year, rejected it.[66]

Constantine sent Galerius an official notice of Constantius's death and his own acclamation. Along with the notice, he included a portrait of himself in the robes of an Augustus.[67] The portrait was wreathed in bay.[68] He requested recognition as heir to his father's throne, and passed off responsibility for his unlawful ascension on his army, claiming they had "forced it upon him".[69] Galerius was put into a fury by the message; he almost set the portrait on fire. His advisers calmed him, and argued that outright denial of Constantine's claims would mean certain war.[70] Galerius was compelled to compromise: he granted Constantine the title "Caesar" rather than "Augustus" (the latter office went to Severus instead).[71] Wishing to make it clear that he alone gave Constantine legitimacy, Galerius personally sent Constantine the emperor's traditional purple robes.[72] Constantine accepted the decision,[71] knowing that it would remove doubts as to his legitimacy.[73]
Early rule
The portrait of Gaius Flavius Valerius Constantinus on Roman coin. the inscription around the portrait is "Constantinus Aug[ustus]".

Constantine's share of the Empire consisted of Britain, Gaul, and Spain. He therefore commanded one of the largest Roman armies, stationed along the important Rhine frontier.[74] After his promotion to emperor, Constantine remained in Britain, and secured his control in the northwestern dioceses. He completed the reconstruction of military bases begun under his father's rule, and ordered the repair of the region's roadways.[75] He soon left for Augusta Treverorum (Trier) in Gaul, the Tetrarchic capital of the northwestern Roman Empire.[76] The Franks, after learning of Constantine's acclamation, invaded Gaul across the lower Rhine over the winter of 306–7.[77] Constantine drove them back beyond the Rhine and captured two of their kings, Ascaric and Merogaisus. The kings and their soldiers were fed to the beasts of Trier's amphitheater in the adventus (arrival) celebrations that followed.[78]
Public baths (thermae) built in Trier by Constantine. More than 100 metres (328 ft) wide by 200 metres (656 ft) long, and capable of serving several thousands at a time, the baths were built to rival those of Rome.[79]

Constantine began a major expansion of Trier. He strengthened the circuit wall around the city with military towers and fortified gates, and began building a palace complex in the northeastern part of the city. To the south of his palace, he ordered the construction of a large formal audience hall, and a massive imperial bathhouse. Constantine sponsored many building projects across Gaul during his tenure as emperor of the West, especially in Augustodunum (Autun) and Arelate (Arles).[80] According to Lactantius, Constantine followed his father in following a tolerant policy towards Christianity. Although not yet a Christian, he probably judged it a more sensible policy than open persecution,[81] and a way to distinguish himself from the "great persecutor", Galerius.[82] Constantine decreed a formal end to persecution, and returned to Christians all they had lost during the persecutions.[83]

Because Constantine was still largely untried and had a hint of illegitimacy about him, he relied on his father's reputation in his early propaganda: the earliest panegyrics to Constantine give as much coverage to his father's deeds as to those of Constantine himself.[84] Constantine's military skill and building projects soon gave the panegyrist the opportunity to comment favorably on the similarities between father and son, and Eusebius remarked that Constantine was a "renewal, as it were, in his own person, of his father's life and reign".[85] Constantinian coinage, sculpture and oratory also shows a new tendency for disdain towards the "barbarians" beyond the frontiers. After Constantine's victory over the Alemanni, he minted a coin issue depicting weeping and begging Alemannic tribesmen—"The Alemanni conquered"—beneath the phrase "Romans' rejoicing".[86] There was little sympathy for these enemies. As his panegyrist declared: "It is a stupid clemency that spares the conquered foe."[87]
Maxentius' rebellion

Following Galerius' recognition of Constantine as caesar, Constantine's portrait was brought to Rome, as was customary. Maxentius mocked the portrait's subject as the son of a harlot, and lamented his own powerlessness.[88] Maxentius, jealous of Constantine's authority,[89] seized the title of emperor on 28 October 306. Galerius refused to recognize him, but failed to unseat him. Galerius sent Severus against Maxentius, but during the campaign, Severus' armies, previously under command of Maxentius' father Maximian, defected, and Severus was seized and imprisoned.[90] Maximian, brought out of retirement by his son's rebellion, left for Gaul to confer with Constantine in late 307. He offered to marry his daughter Fausta to Constantine, and elevate him to Augustan rank. In return, Constantine would reaffirm the old family alliance between Maximian and Constantius, and offer support to Maxentius' cause in Italy. Constantine accepted, and married Fausta in Trier in late summer 307. Constantine now gave Maxentius his meagre support, offering Maxentius political recognition.[91]
Dresden bust of Maxentius

Constantine remained aloof from the Italian conflict, however. Over the spring and summer of 307, he had left Gaul for Britain to avoid any involvement in the Italian turmoil;[92] now, instead of giving Maxentius military aid, he sent his troops against Germanic tribes along the Rhine. In 308, he raided the territory of the Bructeri, and made a bridge across the Rhine at Colonia Agrippinensium (Cologne). In 310, he marched to the northern Rhine and fought the Franks. When not campaigning, he toured his lands advertising his benevolence, and supporting the economy and the arts. His refusal to participate in the war increased his popularity among his people, and strengthened his power base in the West.[93] Maximian returned to Rome in the winter of 307–8, but soon fell out with his son. In early 309, after a failed attempt to usurp Maxentius' title, Maximian returned to Constantine's court.[94]

On 11 November 308, Galerius called a general council at the military city of Carnuntum (Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria) to resolve the instability in the western provinces. In attendance were Diocletian, briefly returned from retirement, Galerius, and Maximian. Maximian was forced to abdicate again and Constantine was again demoted to Caesar. Licinius, one of Galerius' old military companions, was appointed Augustus of the west. The new system did not last long: Constantine refused to accept the demotion, and continued to style himself as Augustus on his coinage, even as other members of the Tetrarchy referred to him as a Caesar on theirs. Maximinus Daia was frustrated that he had been passed over for promotion while the newcomer Licinius had been raised to the office of Augustus, and demanded that Galerius promote him. Galerius offered to call both Maximinus and Constantine "sons of the Augusti",[95] but neither accepted the new title. By the spring of 310, Galerius was referring to both men as Augusti.[96]
Maximian's rebellion
A gold multiple of "Unconquered Constantine" with Sol Invictus, struck in 313. The use of Sol's image appealed to both the educated citizens of Gaul, who would recognize in it Apollo's patronage of Augustus and the arts; and to Christians, who found solar monotheism less objectionable than the traditional pagan pantheon.[97]

In 310, a dispossessed and power-hungry Maximian rebelled against Constantine while Constantine was away campaigning against the Franks. Maximian had been sent south to Arles with a contingent of Constantine's army, in preparation for any attacks by Maxentius in southern Gaul. He announced that Constantine was dead, and took up the imperial purple. In spite of a large donative pledge to any who would support him as emperor, most of Constantine's army remained loyal to their emperor, and Maximian was soon compelled to leave. Constantine soon heard of the rebellion, abandoned his campaign against the Franks, and marched his army up the Rhine.[98] At Cabillunum (Chalon-sur-Saône), he moved his troops onto waiting boats to row down the slow waters of the Saône to the quicker waters of the Rhone. He disembarked at Lugdunum (Lyon).[99] Maximian fled to Massilia (Marseille), a town better able to withstand a long siege than Arles. It made little difference, however, as loyal citizens opened the rear gates to Constantine. Maximian was captured and reproved for his crimes. Constantine granted some clemency, but strongly encouraged his suicide. In July 310, Maximian hanged himself.[98]

In spite of the earlier rupture in their relations, Maxentius was eager to present himself as his father's devoted son after his death.[100] He began minting coins with his father's deified image, proclaiming his desire to avenge Maximian's death.[101] Constantine initially presented the suicide as an unfortunate family tragedy. By 311, however, he was spreading another version. According to this, after Constantine had pardoned him, Maximian planned to murder Constantine in his sleep. Fausta learned of the plot and warned Constantine, who put a eunuch in his own place in bed. Maximian was apprehended when he killed the eunuch and was offered suicide, which he accepted.[102] Along with using propaganda, Constantine instituted a damnatio memoriae on Maximian, destroying all inscriptions referring to him and eliminating any public work bearing his image.[103]

The death of Maximian required a shift in Constantine's public image. He could no longer rely on his connection to the elder emperor Maximian, and needed a new source of legitimacy.[104] In a speech delivered in Gaul on 25 July 310, the anonymous orator reveals a previously unknown dynastic connection to Claudius II, a third-century emperor famed for defeating the Goths and restoring order to the empire. Breaking away from tetrarchic models, the speech emphasizes Constantine's ancestral prerogative to rule, rather than principles of imperial equality. The new ideology expressed in the speech made Galerius and Maximian irrelevant to Constantine's right to rule.[105] Indeed, the orator emphasizes ancestry to the exclusion of all other factors: "No chance agreement of men, nor some unexpected consequence of favor, made you emperor," the orator declares to Constantine.[106]

The oration also moves away from the religious ideology of the Tetrarchy, with its focus on twin dynasties of Jupiter and Hercules. Instead, the orator proclaims that Constantine experienced a divine vision of Apollo and Victory granting him laurel wreaths of health and a long reign. In the likeness of Apollo Constantine recognized himself as the saving figure to whom would be granted "rule of the whole world",[107] as the poet Virgil had once foretold.[108] The oration's religious shift is paralleled by a similar shift in Constantine's coinage. In his early reign, the coinage of Constantine advertised Mars as his patron. From 310 on, Mars was replaced by Sol Invictus, a god conventionally identified with Apollo.[109] There is little reason to believe that either the dynastic connection or the divine vision are anything other than fiction, but their proclamation strengthened Constantine's claims to legitimacy and increased his popularity among the citizens of Gaul.[110]
Civil wars
See also: Civil Wars of the Tetrarchy (306-324 AD)
War against Maxentius
[show]

v
t
e

Battles of Constantine I

By the middle of 310, Galerius had become too ill to involve himself in imperial politics.[111] His final act survives: a letter to the provincials posted in Nicomedia on 30 April 311, proclaiming an end to the persecutions, and the resumption of religious toleration.[112] He died soon after the edict's proclamation,[113] destroying what little remained of the tetrarchy.[114] Maximin mobilized against Licinius, and seized Asia Minor. A hasty peace was signed on a boat in the middle of the Bosphorus.[115] While Constantine toured Britain and Gaul, Maxentius prepared for war.[116] He fortified northern Italy, and strengthened his support in the Christian community by allowing it to elect a new Bishop of Rome, Eusebius.[117]

Maxentius' rule was nevertheless insecure. His early support dissolved in the wake of heightened tax rates and depressed trade; riots broke out in Rome and Carthage;[118] and Domitius Alexander was able to briefly usurp his authority in Africa.[119] By 312, he was a man barely tolerated, not one actively supported,[120] even among Christian Italians.[121] In the summer of 311, Maxentius mobilized against Constantine while Licinius was occupied with affairs in the East. He declared war on Constantine, vowing to avenge his father's "murder".[122] To prevent Maxentius from forming an alliance against him with Licinius,[123] Constantine forged his own alliance with Licinius over the winter of 311–12, and offered him his sister Constantia in marriage. Maximin considered Constantine's arrangement with Licinius an affront to his authority. In response, he sent ambassadors to Rome, offering political recognition to Maxentius in exchange for a military support. Maxentius accepted.[124] According to Eusebius, inter-regional travel became impossible, and there was military buildup everywhere. There was "not a place where people were not expecting the onset of hostilities every day".[125]

Constantine's advisers and generals cautioned against preemptive attack on Maxentius;[126] even his soothsayers recommended against it, stating that the sacrifices had produced unfavorable omens.[127] Constantine, with a spirit that left a deep impression on his followers, inspiring some to believe that he had some form of supernatural guidance,[128] ignored all these cautions.[129] Early in the spring of 312,[130] Constantine crossed the Cottian Alps with a quarter of his army, a force numbering about 40,000.[131] The first town his army encountered was Segusium (Susa, Italy), a heavily fortified town that shut its gates to him. Constantine ordered his men to set fire to its gates and scale its walls. He took the town quickly. Constantine ordered his troops not to loot the town, and advanced with them into northern Italy.[130]

At the approach to the west of the important city of Augusta Taurinorum (Turin, Italy), Constantine met a large force of heavily armed Maxentian cavalry.[132] In the ensuing battle Constantine's army encircled Maxentius' cavalry, flanked them with his own cavalry, and dismounted them with blows from his soldiers' iron-tipped clubs. Constantine's armies emerged victorious.[133] Turin refused to give refuge to Maxentius' retreating forces, opening its gates to Constantine instead.[134] Other cities of the north Italian plain sent Constantine embassies of congratulation for his victory. He moved on to Milan, where he was met with open gates and jubilant rejoicing. Constantine rested his army in Milan until mid-summer 312, when he moved on to Brixia (Brescia).[135]

Brescia's army was easily dispersed,[136] and Constantine quickly advanced to Verona, where a large Maxentian force was camped.[137] Ruricius Pompeianus, general of the Veronese forces and Maxentius' praetorian prefect,[138] was in a strong defensive position, since the town was surrounded on three sides by the Adige. Constantine sent a small force north of the town in an attempt to cross the river unnoticed. Ruricius sent a large detachment to counter Constantine's expeditionary force, but was defeated. Constantine's forces successfully surrounded the town and laid siege.[139] Ruricius gave Constantine the slip and returned with a larger force to oppose Constantine. Constantine refused to let up on the siege, and sent only a small force to oppose him. In the desperately fought encounter that followed, Ruricius was killed and his army destroyed.[140] Verona surrendered soon afterwards, followed by Aquileia,[141] Mutina (Modena),[142] and Ravenna.[143] The road to Rome was now wide open to Constantine.[144]
The Milvian Bridge (Ponte Milvio) over the Tiber, north of Rome, where Constantine and Maxentius fought in the Battle of the Milvian Bridge

Maxentius prepared for the same type of war he had waged against Severus and Galerius: he sat in Rome and prepared for a siege.[145] He still controlled Rome's praetorian guards, was well-stocked with African grain, and was surrounded on all sides by the seemingly impregnable Aurelian Walls. He ordered all bridges across the Tiber cut, reportedly on the counsel of the gods,[146] and left the rest of central Italy undefended; Constantine secured that region's support without challenge.[147] Constantine progressed slowly[148] along the Via Flaminia,[149] allowing the weakness of Maxentius to draw his regime further into turmoil.[148] Maxentius' support continued to weaken: at chariot races on 27 October, the crowd openly taunted Maxentius, shouting that Constantine was invincible.[150] Maxentius, no longer certain that he would emerge from a siege victorious, built a temporary boat bridge across the Tiber in preparation for a field battle against Constantine.[151] On 28 October 312, the sixth anniversary of his reign, he approached the keepers of the Sibylline Books for guidance. The keepers prophesied that, on that very day, "the enemy of the Romans" would die. Maxentius advanced north to meet Constantine in battle.[152]
Constantine's army adopts the Christian cross

Maxentius organized his forces—still twice the size of Constantine's—in long lines facing the battle plain, with their backs to the river.[153] Constantine's army arrived at the field bearing unfamiliar symbols on either its standards or its soldiers' shields.[154] According to Lactantius, Constantine was visited by a dream the night before the battle, wherein he was advised "to mark the heavenly sign of God on the shields of his soldiers...by means of a slanted letter X with the top of its head bent round, he marked Christ on their shields."[155] Eusebius describes another version, where, while marching at midday, "he saw with his own eyes in the heavens a trophy of the cross arising from the light of the sun, carrying the message, In Hoc Signo Vinces or "with this sign, you will conquer";[156] in Eusebius's account, Constantine had a dream the following night, in which Christ appeared with the same heavenly sign, and told him to make a standard, the labarum, for his army in that form.[157] Eusebius is vague about when and where these events took place,[158] but it enters his narrative before the war against Maxentius begins.[159] Eusebius describes the sign as Chi (Χ) traversed by Rho (Ρ): ☧, a symbol representing the first two letters of the Greek spelling of the word Christos or Christ.[160] The Eusebian description of the vision has been explained as a type of solar halo called a "sun dog", a meteorological phenomenon which can produce similar effects.[161] In 315 a medallion was issued at Ticinum showing Constantine wearing a helmet emblazoned with the Chi Rho,[162] and coins issued at Siscia in 317/18 repeat the image.[163] The figure was otherwise rare, however, and is uncommon in imperial iconography and propaganda before the 320s.[164]
The Battle of the Milvian Bridge by Giulio Romano

Constantine deployed his own forces along the whole length of Maxentius' line. He ordered his cavalry to charge, and they broke Maxentius' cavalry. He then sent his infantry against Maxentius' infantry, pushing many into the Tiber where they were slaughtered and drowned.[153] The battle was brief:[165] Maxentius' troops were broken before the first charge.[166] Maxentius' horse guards and praetorians initially held their position, but broke under the force of a Constantinian cavalry charge; they also broke ranks and fled to the river. Maxentius rode with them, and attempted to cross the bridge of boats, but he was pushed by the mass of his fleeing soldiers into the Tiber, and drowned.[167]
In Rome

Constantine entered Rome on 29 October.[168] He staged a grand adventus in the city, and was met with popular jubilation.[169] Maxentius' body was fished out of the Tiber and decapitated. His head was paraded through the streets for all to see.[170] After the ceremonies, Maxentius' disembodied head was sent to Carthage; at this Carthage would offer no further resistance.[171] Unlike his predecessors, Constantine neglected to make the trip to the Capitoline Hill and perform customary sacrifices at the Temple of Jupiter.[172] He did, however, choose to honor the Senatorial Curia with a visit,[173] where he promised to restore its ancestral privileges and give it a secure role in his reformed government: there would be no revenge against Maxentius' supporters.[174] In response, the Senate decreed him "title of the first name", which meant his name would be listed first in all official documents,[175] and acclaimed him as "the greatest Augustus".[176] He issued decrees returning property lost under Maxentius, recalling political exiles, and releasing Maxentius' imprisoned opponents.[177]

An extensive propaganda campaign followed, during which Maxentius' image was systematically purged from all public places. Maxentius was written up as a "tyrant", and set against an idealized image of the "liberator", Constantine. Eusebius, in his later works, is the best representative of this strand of Constantinian propaganda.[178] Maxentius' rescripts were declared invalid, and the honors Maxentius had granted to leaders of the Senate were invalidated.[179] Constantine also attempted to remove Maxentius' influence on Rome's urban landscape. All structures built by Maxentius were re-dedicated to Constantine, including the Temple of Romulus and the Basilica of Maxentius.[180] At the focal point of the basilica, a stone statue of Constantine holding the Christian labarum in its hand was erected. Its inscription bore the message the statue had already made clear: By this sign Constantine had freed Rome from the yoke of the tyrant.[181]
Colossal head of Constantine, from a seated statue: a youthful, classicising, other-worldly official image (Metropolitan Museum of Art)[182]

Where he did not overwrite Maxentius' achievements, Constantine upstaged them: the Circus Maximus was redeveloped so that its total seating capacity was twenty-five times larger than that of Maxentius' racing complex on the Via Appia.[183] Maxentius' strongest supporters in the military were neutralized when the Praetorian Guard and Imperial Horse Guard (equites singulares) were disbanded.[184] Their tombstones were ground up and put to use in a basilica on the Via Labicana.[185] On 9 November 312, barely two weeks after Constantine captured the city, the former base of the Imperial Horse Guard was chosen for redevelopment into the Lateran Basilica.[186] The Legio II Parthica was removed from Alba (Albano Laziale),[179] and the remainder of Maxentius' armies were sent to do frontier duty on the Rhine.[187]
Wars against Licinius

In the following years, Constantine gradually consolidated his military superiority over his rivals in the crumbling Tetrarchy. In 313, he met Licinius in Milan to secure their alliance by the marriage of Licinius and Constantine's half-sister Constantia. During this meeting, the emperors agreed on the so-called Edict of Milan,[188] officially granting full tolerance to Christianity and all religions in the Empire.[189] The document had special benefits for Christians, legalizing their religion and granting them restoration for all property seized during Diocletian's persecution. It repudiates past methods of religious coercion and used only general terms to refer to the divine sphere — "Divinity" and "Supreme Divinity", summa divinitas.[190] The conference was cut short, however, when news reached Licinius that his rival Maximin had crossed the Bosporus and invaded European territory. Licinius departed and eventually defeated Maximin, gaining control over the entire eastern half of the Roman Empire. Relations between the two remaining emperors deteriorated, as Constantine suffered an assassination attempt at the hands of a character that Licinius wanted elevated to the rank of Caesar;[191] in either 314 or 316 the two Augusti fought against one another at the Battle of Cibalae, with Constantine being victorious. They clashed again at the Battle of Mardia in 317, and agreed to a settlement in which Constantine's sons Crispus and Constantine II, and Licinius' son Licinianus were made caesars.[192] After this arrangement, Constantine ruled the dioceses of Pannonia and Macedonia and took residence at Sirmium, from whence he could wage war on the Goths and Sarmatians in 322, and on the Goths in 323.[191]

In the year 320, Licinius reneged on the religious freedom promised by the Edict of Milan in 313 and began to oppress Christians anew,[193] generally without bloodshed, but resorting to confiscations and sacking of Christian office-holders.[194] That became a challenge to Constantine in the West, climaxing in the great civil war of 324. Licinius, aided by Goth mercenaries, represented the past and the ancient Pagan faiths. Constantine and his Franks marched under the standard of the labarum, and both sides saw the battle in religious terms. Outnumbered, but fired by their zeal, Constantine's army emerged victorious in the Battle of Adrianople. Licinius fled across the Bosphorus and appointed Martius Martinianus, the commander of his bodyguard, as Caesar, but Constantine next won the Battle of the Hellespont, and finally the Battle of Chrysopolis on 18 September 324.[195] Licinius and Martinianus surrendered to Constantine at Nicomedia on the promise their lives would be spared: they were sent to live as private citizens in Thessalonica and Cappadocia respectively, but in 325 Constantine accused Licinius of plotting against him and had them both arrested and hanged; Licinius's son (the son of Constantine's half-sister) was also killed.[196] Thus Constantine became the sole emperor of the Roman Empire.[197]
Later rule
Foundation of Constantinople
Coin struck by Constantine I to commemorate the founding of Constantinople

Licinius' defeat came to represent the defeat of a rival center of Pagan and Greek-speaking political activity in the East, as opposed to the Christian and Latin-speaking Rome, and it was proposed that a new Eastern capital should represent the integration of the East into the Roman Empire as a whole, as a center of learning, prosperity, and cultural preservation for the whole of the Eastern Roman Empire .[198] Among the various locations proposed to this alternate capital, Constantine appears to have toyed earlier with Serdica (present-day Sofia), as he was reported saying that "Serdica is my Rome".[199] Sirmium and Thessalonica were also considered.[200] Eventually, however, Constantine decided to work on the Greek city of Byzantium, which offered the advantage of having already been extensively rebuilt on Roman patterns of urbanism, during the preceding century, by Septimius Severus and Caracalla, who had already acknowledged its strategical importance.[201] The city was then renamed Constantinopolis ("Constantine's City" or Constantinople in English), and issued special commemorative coins in 330 to honor the event. The new city was protected by the relics of the True Cross, the Rod of Moses and other holy relics, though a cameo now at the Hermitage Museum also represented Constantine crowned by the tyche of the new city.[202] The figures of old gods were either replaced or assimilated into a framework of Christian symbolism. Constantine built the new Church of the Holy Apostles on the site of a temple to Aphrodite. Generations later there was the story that a divine vision led Constantine to this spot, and an angel no one else could see, led him on a circuit of the new walls. The capital would often be compared to the 'old' Rome as Nova Roma Constantinopolitana, the "New Rome of Constantinople".[197][203]
Religious policy
Further information: Constantine I and Christianity and Constantine the Great and Judaism
Constantine the Great, mosaic in Hagia Sophia, c. 1000

Constantine is perhaps best known for being the first "Christian" Roman emperor.

In February 313, Constantine met with Licinius in Milan, where they developed the Edict of Milan. The edict stated that Christians should be allowed to follow the faith without oppression.[204] This removed penalties for professing Christianity, under which many had been martyred in persecutions of Christians, and returned confiscated Church property. The edict protected from religious persecution not only Christians but all religions, allowing anyone to worship whichever deity he chose. A similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, then senior emperor of the Tetrarchy; Galerius' edict granted Christians the right to practice their religion but did not restore any property to them.[205] The Edict of Milan included several clauses which stated that all confiscated churches would be returned as well as other provisions for previously persecuted Christians.

Scholars debate whether Constantine adopted his mother St. Helena's Christianity in his youth, or whether he adopted it gradually over the course of his life.[206] Constantine would retain the title of pontifex maximus until his death, a title emperors bore as heads of the pagan priesthood, as would his Christian successors on to Gratian (r. 375–83). According to Christian writers, Constantine was over 40 when he finally declared himself a Christian, writing to Christians to make clear that he believed he owed his successes to the protection of the Christian High God alone.[207] Throughout his rule, Constantine supported the Church financially, built basilicas, granted privileges to clergy (e.g. exemption from certain taxes), promoted Christians to high office, and returned property confiscated during the Diocletianic persecution.[208] His most famous building projects include the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and Old Saint Peter's Basilica.

However, Constantine certainly did not patronize Christianity alone. After gaining victory in the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (312), a triumphal arch—the Arch of Constantine—was built (315) to celebrate his triumph. The arch is most notably decorated with images of the goddess Victoria and, at the time of its dedication, sacrifices to gods like Apollo, Diana, and Hercules were made. Most notably absent from the Arch are any depictions whatsoever regarding Christian symbolism.

Later in 321, Constantine instructed that Christians and non-Christians should be united in observing the venerable day of the sun, referencing the esoteric eastern sun-worship which Aurelian had helped introduce. Furthermore, and long after his oft alleged "conversion" to Christianity, Constantine's coinage continued to carry the symbols of the sun. Even after the pagan gods had disappeared from the coinage, Christian symbols appeared only as Constantine's personal attributes: the chi rho between his hands or on his labarum, but never on the coin itself.[209] Even when Constantine dedicated the new capital of Constantinople, which became the seat of Byzantine Christianity for a millennium, he did so wearing the Apollonian sun-rayed Diadem; no Christian symbols were present at this dedication.
Constantine burning Arian books

The reign of Constantine established a precedent for the position of the emperor as having great influence and ultimate regulatory authority within the religious discussions involving the early Christian councils of that time, e.g., most notably the dispute over Arianism, and the nature of God. Constantine himself disliked the risks to societal stability that religious disputes and controversies brought with them, preferring where possible to establish an orthodoxy.[210] One way in which Constantine used his influence over the early Church councils was to seek to establish a consensus over the oft debated and argued issue over the nature of God.

Most notably, from 313–316 bishops in North Africa struggled with other Christian bishops who had been ordained by Donatus in opposition to Caecilian. The African bishops could not come to terms and the Donatists asked Constantine to act as a judge in the dispute. Three regional Church councils and another trial before Constantine all ruled against Donatus and the Donatism movement in North Africa. In 317 Constantine issued an edict to confiscate Donatist church property and to send Donatist clergy into exile.[211] More significantly, in 325 he summoned the Council of Nicaea, effectively the first Ecumenical Council (unless the Council of Jerusalem is so classified). The Council of Nicaea is most known for its dealing with Arianism and for instituting the Nicene Creed.

Constantine enforced the prohibition of the First Council of Nicaea against celebrating the Lord's Supper on the day before the Jewish Passover (14 Nisan) (see Quartodecimanism and Easter controversy). This marked a definite break of Christianity from the Judaic tradition. From then on the Roman Julian Calendar, a solar calendar, was given precedence over the lunar Hebrew Calendar among the Christian churches of the Roman Empire.[212]

Constantine made new laws regarding the Jews. They were forbidden to own Christian slaves or to circumcise their slaves.
Administrative reforms

Beginning in the mid-3rd century the emperors began to favor members of the equestrian order over senators, who had had a monopoly on the most important offices of state. Senators were stripped of the command of legions and most provincial governorships (as it was felt that they lacked the specialized military upbringing needed in an age of acute defense needs[213]), such posts being given to equestrians by Diocletian and his colleagues—following a practice enforced piecemeal by their predecessors. The emperors however, still needed the talents and the help of the very rich, who were relied on to maintain social order and cohesion by means of a web of powerful influence and contacts at all levels. Exclusion of the old senatorial aristocracy threatened this arrangement.

In 326, Constantine reversed this pro-equestrian trend, raising many administrative positions to senatorial rank and thus opening these offices to the old aristocracy, and at the same time elevating the rank of already existing equestrians office-holders to senator, eventually wiping out the equestrian order—at least as a bureaucratic rank[214]—in the process. One could become a senator, either by being elected praetor or (in most cases) by fulfilling a function of senatorial rank:[215] from then on, holding of actual power and social status were melded together into a joint imperial hierarchy. At the same time, Constantine gained with this the support of the old nobility,[216] as the Senate was allowed itself to elect praetors and quaestors, in place of the usual practice of the emperors directly creating new magistrates (adlectio). In one inscription in honor of city prefect (336–37) Ceionius Rufus Albinus, it was written that Constantine had restored the Senate "the auctoritas it had lost at Caesar's time".[217]

The Senate as a body remained devoid of any significant power; nevertheless, the senators, who had been marginalized as potential holders of imperial functions during the 3rd century, could now dispute such positions alongside more upstart bureaucrats.[218] Some modern historians see in those administrative reforms an attempt by Constantine at reintegrating the senatorial order into the imperial administrative elite to counter the possibility of alienating pagan senators from a Christianized imperial rule;[219] however, such an interpretation remains conjectural, given the fact that we do not have the precise numbers about pre-Constantine conversions to Christianity in the old senatorial milieu—some historians suggesting that early conversions among the old aristocracy were more numerous than previously supposed.[220]

Constantine's reforms had to do only with the civilian administration: the military chiefs, who since the Crisis of the Third Century had risen from the ranks,[221] remained outside the senate, in which they were included only by Constantine's

mgt23 · November 06, 2012, 06:52:51 PM

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... bride.html

..........more evidence of the sex cult within the Talmud part of the model.

QuoteWednesday, 17 October 2012
Kosher sex with your son's child bride

picture source

Ebenezer Henderson (1784 - 1858) was a minister in the Anglican church, and a highly accomplished linguist who understood perhaps twenty, or more languages. He spent two decades travelling and preaching in Eurasia, including several years—at the personal invitation of Czar Alexander I—spent exploring the vast Russian Empire, whilst supervising translations of the bible into numerous languages.

A year after his return to Britain in 1825, he published his book Biblical Researches and Travels in Russia, in which he described his time in Poland, and the Jews he meet there. Henderson states that due to the Jewish custom of marrying their children off at a very young age, Jewish men in Poland would regularly have sexual relationships with their pubescent, and pre-pubescent daughters-in-laws, whilst their sons—the husbands of the abused girls—were still children themselves.

Henderson termed this "incestuous familiarity", he knew that sexual relationships with daughters-in-law are strictly forbidden in all branches of Judaism by G-d's Torah (Leviticus 18:15). But Henderson didn't seem to be aware that Rabbinical Jews (90% of the Jews in the world today), made themselves a Talmudic loophole, which exempts a Jewish man from being technically guilty of 1. Adultery, 2. Incest, if they have intercourse with their daughter-in-law, whilst her husband (their son) is still a minor.

Henderson wrote of the Jews in Poland (full book here):

"They generally marry at thirteen and fourteen years of age, and the females still younger. I have heard of a rabbi, who was disposing of his household, preparatory to his departure for Palestine, that gave one of his daughters in marriage who had but just completed her ninth year. As a necessary consequence of this early marriage, it often happens that the young couple are unable to provide for themselves ; and, indeed, altogether incapable, from youth and inexperience, of managing the common concerns of domestic economy. They are, therefore, often obliged to take up their abode at first in the house of the husband's father, except he be in reduced circumstances, and the father of the bride be better able to support them. The young husband pursues the study of the Talmud, or endeavours to make his way in the world by the varied arts of petty traffic for which this people are so notorious. It is asserted to be no uncommon thing among the Jews, for a father to choose for his son's wife some young girl who may happen to be agreeable to himself, and with whom he may live on terms of incestuous familiarity during the period of his son's minority."

"Our Rabbis taught: [And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's (neighbour = Jew) wife the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death]. 'The man' excludes a minor; 'that committeth adultery with another man's wife' excludes the wife of a minor;"

— Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 52b, Soncino Edition

"LITERAL TRANSLATION
GEMARA Our Rabbis taught. "'And the man' — to exclude a minor. 'Who commits adultery with another man's wife' — to exclude the wife of a minor. 'His neighbour's wife' — to exclude the wife of a non-Jew (lit. 'others'). 'They shall Surely be put to death — by strangulation.

TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY
... The words, 'who commits adultery with another man's wife,' teach that a man is only liable for adultery if he had sexual intercourse with the wife of a grown man, to the exclusion of the wife of a minor, for marriage of a minor has no validity in Torah law. The words 'his neighbour's wife,' teach that a man is only liable for adultery if he had sexual intercourse with the wife of a fellow Jew, to the exclusion of the wife of a non-Jew who is not considered a 'neighbour,' for the marriage of a Jewess to a non-Jew has no Halachic validity.

HALAKHAH (Jewish Law)
... "If a man had intercourse with the wife of a minor, he is not liable, for the marriage of a minor has no validity." "

— Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 52b, Steinsaltz Edition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein

QuoteJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education philanthropist. He is responsible for founding The Program for Evolutionary Dynamics at Harvard University, the first of its kind to study evolution from a mathematical point of view.[1]

In 2008, he was convicted of solicitation of a minor for prostitution and served 13 months of an 18-month sentence.[2]
Contents

1 Life
2 Financial career
3 Science funding
4 Solicitation of prostitution
4.1 Civil lawsuits
5 References
6 External links

Life

Born in Brooklyn, New York, Epstein attended Lafayette High School. He attended classes at Cooper Union from 1969 to 1971 and then at the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, leaving without a degree. From 1973 to 1975 he taught calculus and physics at the Dalton School, before becoming an options trader at Bear Stearns.[3][4]
Financial career

Epstein began his financial career in 1976 as an options trader at Bear Stearns.[3] He specialized in mathematical models such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and later worked in the special products division, advising high net worth clients on tax strategies.[3] In 1980, Epstein became a partner at Bear Stearns.[3] In 1982, Epstein founded his own financial management firm, J. Epstein & Co., managing the assets of clients with more than a billion in net worth. In 1987, Leslie Wexner, founder and chairman of the Columbus, Ohio–based Limited chain of women's-clothing stores became a well-known client.[3] In 1996, Epstein changed the name of his firm to The Financial Trust Company and based it in the US Virgin Islands.[3]

In 2003, Epstein publicly bidded for New York Magazine, along with advertising executive, Donny Deutsch, investor Nelson Peltz, publishing mogul and owner of The Daily News, Mortimer Zuckerman and film producer Harvey Weinstein. They were ultimately out bid by longtime wall street investor Bruce Wasserstein for $55 million.[5] In 2004, Epstein and Mortimer Zuckerman, committed to finance up to $25 million to back Radar, a celebrity and pop culture magazine and Maer Roshan, its editor in chief and founder. Epstein and Zuckerman were equal partners in the venture, and Mr. Roshan retained a small ownership stake.[6]

Since all but one of his financial clients are anonymous, it has been speculated that much of Epstein's lavish lifestyle may be financed by Wexner.[3] In September 2002 he flew Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker to Africa in his private Boeing 727, to promote the former president's anti-AIDS efforts.[3]

In addition to his private island called Little St. James Island off of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Epstein owns a 50,000-square-foot (4,600 m2) townhouse in Manhattan that was formerly owned by Les Wexner. The townhouse is reported to be the largest private residence in Manhattan. He also owns a villa in Palm Beach, Florida, an apartment in Paris, France and a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico.[7]
Science funding

Epstein is a financial supporter of the sciences and founder of The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.[8] In 2003, he donated $30 million to Harvard University to set up the university's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, which studies evolution and evolutionary biology from a purely mathematical point of view. Under the direction of Martin Nowak, Epstein was solely responsible for financing new research such as the first mathematical model of the kinetics of human cancer cells.[9] Epstein also funded Nowak's original research on the origin of life and RNA replication on Earth.[10] In 2004, Epstein's foundations funded Nowak's research at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University.[3][11]

Epstein has also funded genetic research leading towards cures in such fields as Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, ovarian cancer and Crohn's and Colitis Disease. [12][13][14]

Epstein has provided funding to scientists such as Gerald Edelman, Murray Gell-Mann, Stephen Hawking, Kip Thorne, Marvin Minsky, Lawrence Krauss, and Gregory Benford.[3][15][16] Epstein's foundations sponsored a conference on St. Thomas in the US Virgin Islands with such scientists as nobel laureates, Gerard 't Hooft, David Gross and Frank Wilczek, theoretical physicist, Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss, covering such topics as a unified gravity theory, neuroscience and artificial intelligence.[17][18]
Solicitation of prostitution

In March 2005, a woman contacted Palm Beach police, concerned that her 14 year old daughter had been taken to Epstein's mansion by an older girl and paid $300 after stripping and massaging him.[19] She had told him that she was 18 years old.[7] She undressed but had left on her underwear.[20] By 2011 at least 40 girls had come forward with similar stories, some saying Epstein sexually assaulted them during the massage.[19]

Police started an 11-month undercover investigation of Epstein, followed by a search of his home. Subsequently, they alleged that Epstein had paid several escorts to perform sexual acts on him. Interviews with five alleged victims and 17 witnesses under oath, phone messages, a high school transcript and other items they found in Mr. Epstein's trash and home allegedly show that some girls were under 18, although some maintained to him at the time that they were of proper age.[21] A search of Epstein's home found numerous photos of girls throughout the house, some of whom had been interviewed earlier by the police.[20] He had set up a system of young women recruiting other women for his massage services.[7] Two housekeepers stated to the police that Epstein would receive massages every day whenever he stayed in Palm Beach.[20] In May 2006, Palm Beach police filed a probable cause affidavit saying that Epstein should be charged with four counts of unlawful sex with minors and one molestation count.[20] His team of lawyers included Gerald B. Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz and later also Kenneth Starr.[7] Epstein passed a lie detector test in which he was asked whether he knew of the under-age status of the girls.[22] They also questioned the credibility of the teenage accusers,[21] based in part on their MySpace postings and information obtained by private investigators.[not in citation given][23]

Instead of following the recommendation of the police, the prosecutors considered the evidence weak[22] and presented it to a grand jury, an uncommon procedure in non-capital cases. The grand jury returned only a single charge of felony solicitation of prostitution,[24] to which Epstein pleaded not guilty in August 2006.[23]

In June, 2008, after pleading to a single state charge of soliciting prostitution, Epstein began serving an 18-month sentence. He served 13 months in jail of his 18-month sentence as a convicted sex offender in the state of Florida for soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. He is a registered sex offender.[25][26][27]

After the accusations became public, several parties returned donations they had received from Epstein, including Eliot L. Spitzer, Mark A. Green, Bill Richardson,[11] and the Palm Beach Police Department.[21] Harvard announced that it would not return any money.[11]

On June 18, 2010, Epstein's former butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, was sentenced to 18 months in jail for trying to sell a journal that he said recorded Epstein's activities. Special Agent Christina Pryor reviewed the material and agreed it was information "that would have been extremely useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, including names and contact information of material witnesses and additional victims."[28][29]
Civil lawsuits

On February 6, 2008, an anonymous Virginia woman filed a $50 million civil lawsuit[30] in federal court against Epstein, alleging that when she was a 16-year-old minor in 2004-2005, she was "recruited to give Epstein a massage." After being brought to his Palm Beach mansion, she claims that he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.[24] A similar $50 million suit was filed by a different woman in March 2008 who was represented by the same lawyer.[31] Several of these lawsuits were dismissed and all other lawsuits were settled out of court.[32] He has so far made 17 out-of-court settlements, and some cases are ongoing.[33]
References

^ Epstein, Jeffrey (14 May 2012). "Harvard University and The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation Search for The Origin of Life". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ "Financier Starts Sentence in Prostitution Case". Retrieved August 3, 2012.New York Times, July 1, 2008.
^ a b c d e f g h i j Landon Thomas Jr. (2002-10-28). "Jeffrey Epstein: International Money Man of Mystery". New York.
^ "JPMorgan's Hersch succeeds colorful money manager". Reuters (Thomson Reuters). 2008-02-11.
^ Carr, David (2003-12-22). "MEDIA; Post-Mortems for a Media Deal Undone". The New York Times.
^ Carr, David (2004-10-19). "Radar Magazine Lines Up Financing". The New York Times.
^ a b c d "The Fantasist". New York. 2007-12-10.
^ "Exceptional Public Schools Cited By Obama, Get Critical Backing From Investor, Jeffrey Epstein". finance.boston.com. 2012-07-05. Retrieved 13 July 2012. "By: http://www.jeffreyepstein.org via PR Newswire"
^ Epstein, Jeffrey (March 12, 2012). "Cooperation as a Major Force for Evolution". Newsblaze. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ Epstein, Jeffrey (14 May 2012). "Harvard University and The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation Search for The Origin of Life". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ a b c "Harvard to Keep Epstein Gift". The Harvard Crimson (Harvard University). 2006-09-13.. Retrieved 2007-09-13.
^ "Genetic Approach for Crohn's and Colitis". The Boston Globe. 3 July 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ "A Vascular Cause For Alzheimers is Found". Reuters. 18 June 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ "Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Gets Substantial Support from Science Investor, Jeffrey Epstein". The Wall Street Journal. 20 June 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
^ http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national ... eep/39072/
^ http://stthomassource.com/content/news/ ... -symposium
^ http://stthomassource.com/content/news/ ... -symposium
^ http://newsblaze.com/story/201201121021 ... story.html
^ a b Leonard, Tom (2011-03-02). "Prince Andrew risks losing ambassador job as girl in underage sex case reveals meeting him". London: Daily Mail.
^ a b c d "Billionaire In Palm Beach Sex Scandal - Investigators: Moneyman Jeffrey Epstein solicited teen masseuses". The Smoking Gun. Archived from the original on 2008-05-13.
^ a b c "Jeffrey Epstein craved big homes, elite friends - and, investigators say, underage girls". Palm Beach Post. 2006-08-14. Archived from the original on 20011-06-16.
^ a b Gregorian, Dareh (2007-11-12). "COPS' FLOPS LETTING MOGUL GET OFF EASY". New York Post.
^ a b Goodnough, Abby (2006-09-03). "Questions of Preferential Treatment Are Raised in Florida Sex Case". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-05-06.
^ a b Keller, Larry (2008-02-06). "Second teen-sex suit seeks $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein". Palm Beach Post. Archived from the original on 2008-02-09.
^ Mulholland, Helene; Watt, Nicholas (2011-03-07). "Prince Andrew must decide whether to continue in trade role, says Vince Cable". The Guardian (London).
^ Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a sex offender, not a predator" New York Post Fabruary 25, 2011 Retrieved 2011-03-07
^ "FBI to reopen case against sex offender friend of Prince Andrew" Mail Online 5 March 2011 Retrieved 2011-03-07
^ Dargan, Michele (June 18, 2010). "Former Epstein house manager Alfredo Rodriguez sentenced to 18 months". Palm Beach Daily News. Retrieved January 12, 2012.
^ Spencer-Wendel, Susan (February 1, 2010). "Ex-Epstein worker faces obstruction charges". The Palm Beach Post. Retrieved January 12, 2012.
^ "Billionaire Faces $50M Sexual Assault Lawsuit". FindLaw. 2008-02-06.
^ Keller, Larry (2008-03-05). "Third alleged victim files sex suit against Jeffrey Epstein". Palm Beach Post.
^ . 2009-09-20. http://celebrifi.com/gossip/Billionaire ... 99009.html.
^ Churcher, Sharon (2011-03-02). "Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his sex offender friend flew to Britain to meet him". The Daily Mail (London: Associated Newspapers Ltd). Retrieved 2 March 2011.

External links

The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, General Philanthropy
The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, Science Philanthropy
The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, US Virgin Islands Philanthropy
The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation Blog
The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation Forum
Jeffrey Epstein Science
Collected news and commentary at The New York Times
Collected news at the New York Daily News
Collected news at the New York Post

Note Kenneth Starr defended this guy.............and how he was friends with the Duke of York(Your ZOHAR connection).

.................note how the Queen Mother regarded him as a Hun(Khazar). Note also his Jewish connections.

http://histclo.com/royal/eng/royal-ukphilip.htm

QuotePrince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (1921- )
Figure 1.--This is Prince Philio with his mother Princess Alice at Hemmelmar in 1929. He was about 8 years old. A a younger boy, Philip spent a good bit of time in Germany. After this, Philip saw less and less of his parents.

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and baron Greenwich, was born Prince of Greece and Denmark in Corfu (Greek: Korfou) on June 10, 1921. We was exiled in 1922, in fact rescued by the Royal Navy. The engagement of the dashing Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten to Princess Elizabeth was announced in July 1947 and the marriage took place in Westminster Abbey on November 20, 1947, a rare ray of light in an England still recovering from World War II. Shortly before the wedding, the bridegroom was created Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich with the style of His Royal Highness and appointed a Knight of the Garter by the King. The Queen and Prince Philip had two children before (Prince Charles, Princess Anne) and two after (Prince Andrew, Prince Edward) Queen Elizabeth II succeeded to the throne. The dashing image of Prince Phillip is a far cry from the current image, which today tends to be that of an arrogant, not very well educated, cantankerous elderly man suffering from a severe case of foot-in-mouth disease. Phillip may well be one of the least understood members of the royal family. Few royals have changed so over the years, evolving from princely refugee to debonair naval officer and from modernising royal to arch traditionalist.
Parents

Prince Philip is realted to the royal families of Denmark, England, Hesse, Germany, and Russia.
Princess Alice of Battenburg (1885-1969)

Philip's great grandmother was Queen Victoria's daughter, Princess Alice who married Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse-Darmstadt (1837-92). Her daughter Victoria Alberta (1863-1950) married Louis of Battenberg (1854-1921). Victoria's children included Louis (Lord Mountbatten, the future World War II hero) and Alice, Prince Phillip' mother. Alice became increasingly estranged from Philip's father, Prince Andrew of Greece. She eventually retreated to a nunnery offering little support to the young Philip.
Prince Andrew (1882-1944)

The popularity of Lord Louis Mountbatten has resulted in Prince Philip being identified with his mother's side of the family. Prince Philip is reported to have said, "I don't think anyone thinks I had a father. Most people think that Dickie's my father anyway." Philip's father was Prince (of Greece and Denmark) Andrew of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg, (1882- ). Prince Andrew was a son of Greek King George I of Greece. (One author stresses that King George was not Greek, but was King of Greece.) Prince Andrew was arrested in 1922 by Greek dictator Pangalos and probably would have been executed had George V not insisted that the British Government interven on his behalf. Prince Andrew eventually separated from Princess Alice. Andrew moved to Monte Carlo, where he died in the arms of his mistress in 1944 during World War II.
Siblings

Prince Philip had three four older sisters. They all married German princlings. One was killed in the War. Phillip, however, came out on the English side of the family. His sisters, especially Margarita and Theodora were quite a bit older than Philip, more like aunts in their relationship. Margarita mairred Gotfried of Hohenlohe-Langenberg (1897-1960). They had five children. Theodora mairred Bertholdf, Margrave of Baden (1906-63). They had three children. Philip spent many of his younger years with them. Cecile married George Donatus of Hesse (1906-37). Princess Sophie was the sister closest to Philip in age and remembers his antics as a little boy. She married Prince Christopher of Hesse (1901-43) and had five children. When he died during World War II she married George William of Hannover (1915- ). Thaey had three children. After World War II she moved to England and was supported by her brother Prince Philip.
Childhood

Philip was born in 1921 on Corfu into the atmosphere of extreme uncertainty and danger that shrouded the Greek royal family at that time. At the age of 18 months, he was carried aboard a Royal Navy ship, the HMS Calypso in an orange box as his mother and sisters fled the military junta that had overthrown the Greek monarchy following the country's defeat at the hands of the Turks and the influx of refugees from Turkish territory. There waas a Greek lady in waiting, a French governess, and an English nany. The Royal Navy landed the young prince and his family at Brindisi and put them on a train to Paris. It is said that the Philip crawled everywhere on the train and was soon filthy from heaf to foot. His mother protested, but the nanny adbised leaving him be. His eldest sister tells us, "He was very active." [Heald, Philip, p. 12.] As a boy Philip had a rootless existence, drifting between the palaces of his British relatives and minor royal households of Europe--especially German. Philip was largely abandoned by his parents. (Philip's inheritance was an ivory-handled shaving brush and a few moth-eaten suits.) He learned at an early age to look after himself and be self reliant. His sisters married Germans (and fought for Germny in World war II) and for a while Philip lived in Germany. He was 12 years old when the NAZIs took over. If he had stayed in Germany he would have had to join the Hitler Youth and as a handsome, blond youth--a career in the SS may well have resulted. (An uncle was already in the SS.) Philip has never been accussed of being of having a brilliant mind or being ovely sensitive. Here as a boy, however, his judgement was impecable. He thought the NAZIs struting arround in uniforms were foolish. His Jewish Headmaster Kurt Hahn was certainly an influence here. Philip took off for England. His grandmother Victoria Alberta helped him a great deal. His Uncle George became his guardian. Uncle Dickie also took a special interest in him.
Boyhood Clothes

We have little information on Philip's clothes as a boy. One family portrait shows him wearing a sailor suit in 1928. Most available images show him wearing short pants.
Education

Philip despite his parents problems appeared to thrive. He was educated at Cheam and at the German public school Salem, and when the latter's Jewish headmaster Kurt Hahn fled NAZI persecution, Philip followed him to the new public school he set up in Scotland - Gordonstoun. After Gordonstoun it was off th the Royal Naval Academy at Dartmouth.
Philip and the NAZIs

Critics of the monarchy and Prince Philip in particular like to discuss the connections between the Windsors and Prince Philip's family and the NAZIs. There were connections. There was Victoria's grandson Charles-Edward who became a NAZI. There were the Duke of Windsor's daliances with the NAZIs, and each of Philip's sisters maried German princes, including NAZI sympthiizers. One was even an SS colonel. The problem with all this was that Ohilip rejected the NAZIs even as a boy. The history of Germany is full of all too many who fell under the influence of the NAZIs. It is refreshing to read of one little boy who rejected them absolutely. This is interesting because it is asboys, especially athleticaly oriented boys, that the NAZIs through the Hitler Youth had great appeal. We are not entirely sure why Philip rejected the NAZIs. It was not the adults in his family. In fact he was largely abandoned by his family. His sisters were not particularly offended by the NAZIs. They hapily married German princes, some with strong NAZI afiliations. Thus the question of what influences the young Philip is interesting. Perhaps it was his time at Cheam. His German-Jewish school master, Kurth Hahn, appears to have been a major influence here. The story of how a little German prince turned his back on the NAZIs is an interesting one. I wish Prince Philip would write a detailed account of this.

QuoteFamily Dynamics

Prince Philip during World War II Anglicised his name to Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten. He was in fact a German prince, with a family name of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glucksburgs. After World War II that was not the best family pedigree for someone who wanted to marry the Princess Elizabeth. Philip had a string spokesman in his corner--his uncle, Lord Mountbatten. But most importantly, the young princess was simply infatuated with the tall, blond, "Viking" Prince. King George had his misgivings, primarily that Elizabeth was still very young. The primary opposition to the marriage, however, came from Elizabeth's mother Queen Elizabeth. The Queen mother was strongly anti-German. This came from an early age. Her brother Captain Fergus Bowes-Lyon was killed at the Battle of Loos (1915). And her view of the Germans was only intensified during the London Blitz (1940). The idea that her cherished daughter Lilibet would many a Germany was actually offensive to her. And not just any German, but a German prince with four sisters married to Germans. She took to calling Phillip, "The Hun,"but I don't think in front of her daughter. Not only did she dislike Philip's German background, but thought it would weaken the monarchy. The was not sure the British public would accept a German husband for their future queen. The Windsors wre a German family, buth the Queen mother was concerned that Philip would draw increased attention to it. One source close to the Queen mother explained, "Queen Elizabeth opposed the marriage. She distrusted the Mountbattens, and felt that her daughter ought to marry a British duke. She lobbied against it, and said to me at the time: 'The trouble is that Philip is so impossibly attractive, and Lilibet just cannot see beyond that'"[Dowager Lady Hardinge of Penshurst] And that was precisely it. Princess Elizabeth was smitten with Philip and she was going to have him. Despite their misgivings, the King and Queen gave their consent to the marriage..

http://israel.thejview.com/religion/maz ... h-wedding/

QuoteMazal Tov! Prince William And Kate Middleton's Jewish Wedding

Posted: Mar 22nd, 2011 11:39 AM
Share

LONDON - As far as Royal Weddings go, Prince William and his bride-to-be Kate Middleton are apparently all about bending the rules.

The happy couple, who recently released their wedding itinerary, decided not only that Middleton will not arrive at her wedding in a carriage but in the limousine attacked by students during riots in London three months ago, but that they will also celebrate with a traditional Jewish custom.

According to the Jewish Chronicle, Prince William will end the Anglican ceremony with the traditional glass-breaking custom known to end Jewish weddings.

Buckingham Palace spokesperson Esther Calthorpe-Watts said in a statement "They want everyone to feel a part of the wedding. And while, religiously, the ceremony will be completely Anglican in nature, they felt it appropriate to include these small gestures towards other faiths. "

"If the congregation at the Abbey wants to wish the happy couple 'mazeltov' we will be very happy but this will be totally optional," she said.

read more at Haaretz

http://www.jewornotjew.com/profile.jsp?ID=307

QuoteKate Middleton
January 9, 1982 —

For a while now, we've been trying to find Jewish European royalty. It seemed plausible at first, but we soon realized that we're barking up the wrong tree. European kings must have had great genealogy researchers, but with a goal completely opposite from ours: "I'm sorry, son, but you can't marry the lovely Rebecca, for her maternal great-great-great-uncle changed his name from Cohen to Cole. Why don't you marry the horse-faced Augusta instead?"

Perhaps it's more possible in the modern world, with less emphasis on bloodlines and more desire for European princes to avoid horse-faced brides? Alas, that is not the case. It seems that Australian hotties are the hot item, but nice Jewish girls are still off limits. What can we do.

But what's this? Some people think that Kate Middleton, quite possibly the next Queen of England, just might be somewhat Jewish? She might not be royalty yet, but we have to check.

You see, Kate's mother's maiden name is Goldsmith. And there are people with the last names of Temple and Meyers in her family tree, which apparently is enough to make some think that she has Jewish ancestry. There is absolutely no proof that's the case, but even if it were, that Jewish link was lost a long, long time ago. Genealogy research is not just limited to days past, and in case of Kate possibly ascending the British throne, her lineage has been studied at length. And for at least five generations, Kate's ancestors have been married in churches. Nothing Jewish about that.

Well, the mission is clear now. It's too late for us to marry into royalty, but there might just be a future generation ready to get started. Could a prince or princess be in their future? It doesn't seem impossible, right? Right?

Verdict: Not a Jew.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edw ... ke_of_Kent

QuoteFreemasonry

The Duke is the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England, the governing body of Freemasonry in England and Wales. Prince Edward has served in that office since 1967.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Gra ... of_England

QuoteThe United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) is the main governing body of freemasonry within England and Wales and in other, predominantly ex-British Empire and Commonwealth countries outside the United Kingdom. It claims to be the oldest Grand Lodge in the world, deriving its origin from 1717. Together with the Grand Lodge of Ireland and the Grand Lodge of Scotland they are often referred to, by their members, as "the home Grand Lodges" or "the Home Constitutions".
History
Main article: History of Freemasonry

Prior to 1717 there is evidence of Freemasons' lodges in both England and Scotland, with the earliest being in Scotland. On 24 June 1717, three existing London lodges and a Westminster lodge held a joint dinner at the Goose and Gridiron alehouse in St. Paul's Churchyard, elected a gentleman, Anthony Sayer, to the chair as Grand Master, and called themselves a Grand Lodge. The City of London Corporation has erected a Blue Plaque near the location.

In 1718 Sayer, who despite his significant social rank was obscure and impoverished, was succeeded by George Payne, an energetic and successful tradesman. In 1721, the Grand Lodge managed to obtain a nobleman, the Duke of Montagu to preside as Grand Master, and so was able to establish itself as an authoritative regulatory body, and began meeting on a quarterly basis. This resulted in lodges outside of London becoming affiliated, accepting sequentially numbered warrants conferring seniority over later applicants.

In 1723, by authority of the Grand Lodge, James Anderson published the Constitutions of Masonry[1] for the purposes of regulating the craft and establishing the Grand Lodge's authority to warrant Lodges to meet. The book includes a fanciful history of the Craft, which nevertheless contains much interesting material.[2]

The creation of Lodges followed the development of the Empire, with all three home Grand Lodges warranting Lodges around the world, including the Americas, India and Africa, from the 1730s. Thomas Thynne, 2nd Viscount Weymouth, was Grand Master in 1735–36.[3]

Throughout the early years of the new Grand Lodge there were any number of Masons and lodges that never affiliated with the new Grand Lodge. These unaffiliated Masons and their Lodges were referred to as "Old Masons", or "St. John Masons", and "St. John Lodges".[4]

During the 1730s and 1740s antipathy increased between the London Grand Lodge and the Grand Lodges of Ireland and Scotland. Irish and Scots Masons visiting and living in London considered the London Grand Lodge to have deviated substantially from the ancient practices of the Craft. As a result, these Masons felt a stronger kinship with the unaffiliated London Lodges. The aristocratic nature of the London Grand Lodge and its members alienated other Masons causing them also to identify with the unaffiliated Lodges.[5]

On 17 July 1751, representatives of five Lodges gathered at the Turk's Head Tavern, in Greek Street, Soho, London and formed a rival Grand Lodge – "The Grand Lodge of England According to the Old Institutions". They considered that they practiced a more ancient and therefore purer form of Masonry, and called their Grand Lodge The Ancients' Grand Lodge. They called those affiliated to the Premier Grand Lodge, by the pejorative epithet The Moderns. These two unofficial names stuck.[6]

An illustration of how deep the division between the two factions became over the next fifty years is the case of Benjamin Franklin, who was a member of a Moderns' Lodge in Philadelphia. Upon returning from France, it transpired that his Lodge had changed to (and had received a new warrant from) the Ancients Grand Lodge; no longer recognizing him and declining to give him Masonic Honours at his funeral.[7]

In 1809 the Moderns appointed a "Lodge of Promulgation" to return their own ritual to regularity with Scotland, Ireland and especially the Ancients. In 1811 both Grand Lodges appointed Commissioners and over the next two years, articles of Union were negotiated and agreed. In January 1813 the Duke of Sussex became Grand Master of the Moderns on the resignation of his brother, the Prince Regent, and in December of that year another brother, Duke of Kent became Grand Master of the Antients. On 27 December 1813 the United Grand Lodge of England ("UGLE") was constituted at Freemasons' Hall, London with HRH the Duke of Sussex (younger son of King George III) as Grand Master. A Lodge of Reconciliation was formed to reconcile the rituals worked under the two former Grand Lodges.[8]

UGLE adopted the ritual demonstrated by the Lodge of Reconciliation although, in accordance with the contemporary understanding of the Masonic obligations, it was not minuted or officially recorded. Some linking passages can be regarded as merely ancillary and insignificant, and there are numerous possible interpretations, gestures and floorwork, so there are now many published variants and rubrics. UGLE has always declined to make any general rulings in matters of ritual, although it has authorised and mandated specific changes to reflect developments in society as a whole.
Current position

Today, the United Grand Lodge of England or Grand Lodge currently has over a quarter of a million members meeting in over 8,000 Lodges,[9] organised into a number of subordinate Provincial Grand Lodges which are approximately equivalent to the historic counties of England.

Lodges meeting in London (an area generally within a 10-mile radius of Freemasons' Hall) are, with five exceptions, administered by the Metropolitan Grand Lodge of London, headed by the Metropolitan Grand Master.
Lodges meeting outside London, and within England, Wales, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands, are grouped into 47 Provincial Grand Lodges (UGLE), each headed by a Provincial Grand Master.
Lodges that meet outside England, Wales, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are grouped into 33 District Grand Lodges, each headed by a District Grand Master.
Five Groups (i.e.: currently too small to make up a District), each headed by a Grand Inspector.
Five Lodges in London and 12 Lodges abroad that are directly administered by Freemasons' Hall.

Grand Masters

Prince Augustus, Duke of Sussex (1813–1843)
Thomas Dundas, 2nd Earl of Zetland (1844–1870)
George Robinson, 3rd Earl de Grey and 2nd Earl of Ripon (1st Marquess of Ripon from 1871) (1870–1874)
Albert Edward, Prince of Wales (1874–1901)
Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn (1901–1939)
Prince George, Duke of Kent (1939–1942)
Henry Lascelles, 6th Earl of Harewood (1942–1947)
Edward Cavendish, 10th Duke of Devonshire (1947–1950)
Lawrence Lumley, 11th Earl of Scarbrough (1951–1967)
Prince Edward, Duke of Kent (1968–present)

See also

Freemasons' Hall, London

Notes

^ "Anderson's Constitutions". Retrieved 2010-05-31., "Introduction to Anderson Constitution of 1723, by Bro. Lionel Vibert". Retrieved 2010-05-31.
^ Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, passim
^ Thomas Thynne, 2nd Viscount Weymouth, thepeerage.com
^ Coil, Henry W. (1961). Two articles: "England, Grand Lodge of, According to the Old Institutions," pp. 237-240; and "Saints John," pp. 589-590. Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia. (rev. ed. 1996). Richmond, Va: Macoy Publ. & Masonic Supply Co. Inc.
^ Jones, Bernard E. (1950). Freemasons' Guide and Compendium, (rev. ed. 1956) London: Harrap Ltd.
^ Batham, Cyril N. (1981). "The Grand Lodge of England According to the Old Institutions, otherwise known as The Grand Lodge of the Antients." The Collected Prestonian Lectures, 1975-1987, Vol. Three. London (1988): Lewis Masonic.
^ Revolutionary Brotherhood, by Steven C. Bullock, Univ. N. Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1996
^ Pietre-Stones Lodges of Instruction, Yasha Beresiner, retrieved 17th July 2012
^ About UGLE - 10/2011

......................you see is what i am claiming is that the Khazar Murder Cult are not biologically jewish but ARE ZOHARITE. They actively take Jewish names and practice Zoharite culture and are in cohoots with the TALMUDISTS since the Great Schism. We are seeing the consolidation of power of New York Talmudists in subjugating London Zoharites since Thatcher/Blair(The Queen couldn't stand them). The monarchy and Zoharites only card left is to MASS KILL in WW3 to maintain power in a pogrom/cull. Hence the Qlippoth.

"Beware of those who say they are Jews but are not......they are of the synagogue of satan."

THEY ALL HAVE TO GO AND FAST.

mgt23 · November 06, 2012, 08:03:47 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ds-newsxml

QuoteWill there be a child abuse 'super inquiry'? Ministers warned that allegations are the 'tip of the iceberg'

Home Secretary Theresa May announced National Crime Agency investigation into abuse in North Wales children's home in the 1970s and 80s
She also suggested the Government may launch a wider inquiry into claims senior Tories were involved
Ex-resident at Bryn Estyn children's home claims Thatcher aide abused boys

By James Chapman and Tim Shipman

PUBLISHED: 23:35, 6 November 2012 | UPDATED: 23:35, 6 November 2012

Comments (0)
Share

Investigation: Home Secretary Theresa May has announced a new investigation into child abuse in North Wales in the 70s and 80s

Investigation: Home Secretary Theresa May has announced a new investigation into child abuse in North Wales in the 70s and 80s

A single wide-ranging judicial inquiry into 'absolutely horrific' evidence of systematic child abuse by figures of authority over several decades looked increasingly likely last night.

There were growing cross-party calls for an over-arching investigation as the number of separate probes into allegations of paedophilia at the BBC, care homes and in Whitehall reached double figures.

Home Secretary Theresa May told MPs that the National Crime Agency (NCA) is to mount an investigation into alleged abuse in North Wales in the 1970s and 1980s amid claims that a senior Tory of the day was among the perpetrators.

But she suggested that a single, wider probe was being considered by the Government once initial police inquiries are concluded.

'I think what is absolutely horrific, frankly, is the extent to which this child abuse has been taking place over the years and across our communities over the years,' the Home Secretary said.

David Cameron, speaking on a trip to the Middle East, also opened the door to a broader judicial inquiry into the tide of historic child sex abuse allegations which began with revelations about Jimmy Savile's paedophile activities at the BBC.

'Let's find out as quickly as possible whether we have a problem here. If we have a problem here then we have to take further steps,' the Prime Minister said.

'I don't rule out further inquiries, further investigations, further ways of learning lessons because clearly we've discovered some appalling things in recent days, particularly on the Jimmy Savile front.'

On top of the Savile scandal – which has dragged in the NHS and the police – there are increasingly wild allegations of an establishment paedophile ring involving members of the Thatcher government.

More...

Former detective makes shock claims that Jimmy Savile was quizzed over Yorkshire Ripper murders
Freddie Starr cancels show 'to concentrate on defending sex abuse allegations'
Jimmy Savile's nephew, 69, who 'hero-worshipped uncle dies of a broken heart' over paedophile scandal
Girl, 8, revealed as Jimmy Savile's youngest victim launches claim to sue his £4.3million estate as builder, 52, claims he is BBC star's lovechild

NCA director general Keith Bristow will review the original police handling of complaints of a paedophile ring abusing children in care homes in North Wales, and examine the latest claims by an alleged victim.

Separately, High Court judge Mrs Justice Julia Wendy Macur is to lead a review of the Waterhouse Inquiry, an inquiry set up by the then Welsh Secretary William Hague, into allegations of child abuse at North Wales care homes.
Quick move: Prime Minister David Cameron, pictured meeting students at a Saudi Arabian university yesterday, said he wants a swift investigation into whether the rumours are true

Quick move: Prime Minister David Cameron, pictured meeting students at a Saudi Arabian university yesterday, said he wants a swift investigation into whether the rumours are true

'The Government is treating these allegations with the utmost seriousness,' Mrs May said.

'Child abuse is a hateful, abhorrent and disgusting crime and we must not allow these allegations to go unanswered.'
Current Probes

Former Conservative children's minister Tim Loughton said the Prime Minister had acted 'commendably swiftly' but there were now so many inquiries into child abuse, there was a serious danger of not being able to see 'the wood for the trees'.

He called for one, over-arching investigation, adding: 'This is just getting going, this is the tip of the iceberg, this is going to get bigger and it's going to go into other areas.

'We're getting an inquiry a week. There are now victims out there whose voices are only beginning to be heard.

'I think we have just got to have one over-arching, robust inquiry led by a high-level figure.'

Labour's deputy chairman Tom Watson, who last month claimed there was 'clear intelligence' suggesting a historic paedophile ring may be linked to Downing Street, criticised the Government's response.

He said: 'The lesson of Hillsborough and hacking is that a narrowed-down investigation is the basic building block of a cover-up.

'To limit this inquiry to North Wales and Savile would, in my view, be a dereliction of the Home Secretary's duty.'

In a direct attack on Mrs May, which drew cries of protest from the Conservative benches, he asked: 'Does she sincerely want to start making amends or can she live with being what she has just announced: the next stage of a cover-up.'

n The child protection system in England is failing vulnerable teenagers and is in urgent need of review, MPs warn today.

The Commons Education Committee said that while local authorities had a duty to safeguard all children up to the age of 18, too often the needs of older youngsters were not met.

It said its inquiry uncovered a 'worrying picture' of the protection and support available to children aged 14 to 18.
In charge: National Crime Agency boss Keith Bristow, pictured being decorated with the Queen's Police Medal in 2008, is to review historic allegations of child abuse at North Wales care homes

In charge: National Crime Agency boss Keith Bristow, pictured being decorated with the Queen's Police Medal in 2008, is to review historic allegations of child abuse at North Wales care homes

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2BUSG7WYS
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

..........What we are seeing is a last ditch attempt to purge Talmudic compromised elements of the Zoharite Crown, before the crown is destroyed, as was the Vatican (remember all the peadophile priests in america?). What they are not saying is that they knew all along and did nothing until the economy went tits with open ended bond purchasing this last two months. In other words the Talmudic JEW greed has threatened the powerbase of the Zoharites in the military and landed gentry.