Concepts for the 'Third Jewish Temple'

[FrankDialogue]

Let me say at the outset, although the Kaballist who wrote this mentions Christians and Muslims throughout this piece, Christians do not believe in any physical temple, or any physical 'New Jerusalem', whatever this 'rabbi' may spew...That being said, this excerpt and it's parent website offers insight into 'progressive Jewish thinking' on the temple issue...Frank D.





...maybe an alternative like this?...EU Central Bank, Frankfort Germany

Proposed Design 'A' - the Cubic Form

In this design the future temple is suggested in the form of a giant cube which will act as a vehicle for social communications.



The cube, about 200 meters (over 600 feet) on each side is in fact an extension of the cubical form of the Holy of Holies. Strachan (1985) has pointed the functional significance of the cubical space, and in the following we shall point to the symbolic meaning of the cube as seen from the outside. This cube may be very meaningful to Christians, Moslems and Jews alike. For Christians, this is the cubical form of "the New Jerusalem" described in the Book of Revelation (21:16) which seals the Christian Bible. Nowadays we witness the resurgence of many Christians sects which attribute a great significance to this book, within their expectation for the return of the Messiah, and some regard the New Jerusalem (described there as a giant cube) an abode for many thousands of people. For the Moslems, the cube is the cube-Ka'aba of Mecca - the Moslem Holy of Holies - that would be moved/translated to Jerusalem. An ancient Moslem legend (Vilnay, 1981) relates that at the End of Days the Ka'aba will fly from Mecca to Jerusalem. Since the Moslem resistance for the rebuilding of the temple is its main impediment, this proposed design may mitigate the Moslem resistance and it may well be seen as the fulfillment of the Moslem visions as well.

As for the Jews, the cube is the form of the Tefilin (Phylacteries), which every religious Jewish man dons over his forehead and arm during prayer, to bind his soul to God. The legend in the Berakhot tractate in the Talmud claims that God Himself dons Tefilin. The proposed design may then symbolize to the Jews kind of head Tefilin - a most important religious object for the orthodox - put over Jerusalem. There are some who assert that wearing the head phylactery equals "opening the Third Eye" in the head (perhaps to stimulate the pineal gland to form a new integration between the two brain (cortical) hemispheres, which will bring about a intuitive and holy-holist vision). Even "New Age" adherents may see in the temple cube a head phylactery geared to open "the Third Eye" of the "Global Brain".

The functional aim is for a hollow cube, namely just like the space of the Holy of Holies, only on a giant scale. The four walls will contain cells - just as did the walls of the Holy f Holies in the Second Temple - and these cells will serve people in their encounter with the Presence of the Lord (the Shekhinah), and with their own supernal and eternal soul. Assuming that these walls will be built as a closely packed (but squared) "honeycomb" of cells, that on each floor will be 50 such cells and that there will be 50 floors in that giant cube, there will be 2,500 cells on each wall and 10,000, a myriad, cells in the whole future temple. In a larger cube, of about 70 floors and cells in each floor - there will be twice this number of temple cells.

The Meaning of Sacrifice in the Future Temple



The Jewish tradition contains many explanations for sacrifices. One of the most dramatic moments in the Bible is the binding of Isaac, where on the spot of the future Temple animal sacrifice substituted for the human sacrifice of Isaac.

In the Kabbalah "the secret of sacrifices" (Sod haKorbanot) is interpreted in terms of transformations of spiritual and vital energies (Hayut) to get closer to God. According to the teachings of Hassidism we all have an animal soul and a divine soul. The divine souls are interconnected in hidden ways, and the assembly of all of them constitutes a unified and sacred divine entity, an entity that is developing through the spiritual development of each one of its individual components.

The Torah and its commandments were formed to guide the spiritual transformation from the dominance of the animal soul to the preeminence of the divine soul. This "divine soul" is common to all humankind, as well as to all the spiritual worlds. The majority of the commandments of the Torah deal with Temple worship and the sacrifices, processes of spiritual transformation that are not available to us as long as the Temple is not functioning.

Based on the above ideas we propose that worship in the future Temple will not include the substitute animal sacrifices, but the sacrifice/dedication of the animal soul of each person. In this way we may return to the primal intensity of sacrifice: human sacrifices. This time it will be self-sacrifice rather than the sacrifice of a substitute offering. Sacrifice will return to its primordial meaning, namely man will be able to realize his whole being, illuminated by his Divine spark, through "dying to his animal soul" to make space for the Divine within.

We could see a combination of 'virtual' and 'actual' temples.....Frank D.

About Sacrifices in the Virtual Temple

Virtual death sacrifices (as in most computer games) are not that attractive, and are not likely to engage the player spiritually. In order to create meaningful sacrifices in the virtual temple, we can look at what people do in casinos, whether they are real or virtual. The players place tokens - which represent their material assets - on the gambling table, which acts as a kind of altar upon which these "sacrificial offerings" are "burnt". In exchange, they expect the blessing of Chance, a process somewhat reminiscent of the people who used to bring their cattle (Mikne, literally "asset") to the Temple, expecting a blessing, and the priests accepted these for slaughter and burning.

The utilization of casino-like procedures may bring more realism and represent the element of risk associated with the offering of sacrifices. People who come to the Temple in order to improve themselves will be able to "gamble" on the spiritual degree they may attain, namely to convert their current spiritual state for a deeper more fulfilling one.

Each participant needs to gamble something important and dear to him. Two possibilities are: 1) personal confessions/annoying secrets which (s)he will be ready to expose in the course of the process or 2) a real sum of money. An important condition for the sacrifice of money is - just like it was in the real Temple - that the money deposited shall not be more than a tenth of one's capital, and will be distributed to charities through certified organizations.





Read the whole thing at:

'Building the Third Temple'
http://thehope.tripod.com/vt-build.htm#pattern

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Yeah Frank, they'll probably end up making a luxury Hexagram-Casino high-rise.  With a Kosher-Slaughter kitchen...manned by Phillipinos and Rabbis....

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=16554&p=67051

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=14890&p=63672

In 361 AD, Julian the Apostate tried to reverse Constantine's anti-pagan, pro-Christian influence and he gave permission to the Jews to come and rebuild the Jewish temple on the temple mount. The Jews dug up the foundations of and excavated the temple mount. In May 363 AD an earthquake that caused an explosion of underground gases on the temple mount, ended the Jewish efforts to rebuild the temple.

In 400 AD, Jerome's commentary on Matthew mentions an equestrian statue of the Emperor Hadrian was still standing directly over the site of the Holy of the Holies. Perhaps Constantine wanted to keep the statues of Hadrian on the site as a reminder to the Jews that God was unhappy with them for crucifying His Son Jesus. On the other hand, the Jews would surely remove the statue in 361 AD, when they tried to rebuild the temple. Yet if all this knowledge was available to Jerome in 400 AD, after such a statue had been removed, it would have been known to Constantine, who destroyed the Temple of Jupiter 75 years earlier. It appears that Constantine was under the impression that the Jewish temple was located over the "rock". Perhaps someone brought back the statue from where the Jews removed it after 363 AD, as a message to the Jews their temple would never be rebuilt and that they should believe in Jesus. In spite of these conflicting problems in the history that we have, if we use the Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek as a model, this would place the Holy of the Holies at the El Kas foundation, for that is where Hadrian would likely place his statue of himself riding a horse. Jerome wrote in 400 AD, "So when you see the standing in the holy place the abomination that causes desolation... or to the statue of the mounted Hadrian, which stands to this very day on the site of the Holy of Holies." (Jerome, Commentary on Matthew 24.15, 400 AD)

In 400 AD, Jerome's letter to Paulinus stated that Hadrian had marked all the "holy sites" with idols. These included Venus at the birth cave in Bethlehem, Venus at Golgotha, and Jupiter at the site of the tomb. It would seem very consistent that Hadrian would indeed put a statue of himself over the very spot of the Holy of Holies. Jerome wrote in 400 AD: "From the time of Hadrian to the reign of Constantine—a period of about one hundred and eighty years [Hadrian died in 138 A.D.; Constantine became Emperor in 306 A.D.] -the spot which had witnessed the resurrection was occupied by a figure of Jupiter; while on the rock where the cross had stood, a marble statue of Venus was set up by the heathen and became an object of worship. The original persecutors, indeed, supposed that by polluting our holy places they would deprive us of our faith in the passion and in the resurrection. Even my own Bethlehem, as it now is, that most venerable spot in the whole world of which the psalmist sings: "the truth hath sprung out of the earth," was overshadowed by a grove of Tammuz, that is of Adonis; and in the very cave where the infant Christ had uttered His earliest cry lamentation was made for the paramour of Venus." (Jerome, Letter 58. To Paulinus, 3, 400 AD)

[FrankDialogue]

Yeah Frank, they'll probably end up making a luxury Hexagram-Casino high-rise.  With a Kosher-Slaughter kitchen...manned by Phillipinos and Rabbis....

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=16554&p=67051

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=14890&p=63672

Hang on here, as I may be misunderstanding something...I understand today's 'Jews' claim the Wailing Wall is a remaining part of what they call the last temple...This temple was built by Herod, who, BTW, was an Idumean not a 'Jew', and was the temple that Jesus threw threw the merchants out of, correct?

OK...Now, from what I have read of the history of Jerusalem, this 'wailing wall' was never a part of the temple at all, but was only a part of a structure that was used to store supplies and such for the Roman garrison there, at the bottom of the temple mount...This wall was the only part of any building connected to the mount that was left standing after Vespusian's son Titus destroyed the city and plowed everything under...With me so far?

Or is the 'wailing wall' actually part of a later pagan temple?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Yeah Frank, they'll probably end up making a luxury Hexagram-Casino high-rise.  With a Kosher-Slaughter kitchen...manned by Phillipinos and Rabbis....

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=16554&p=67051

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=14890&p=63672

Hang on here, as I may be misunderstanding something...I understand today's 'Jews' claim the Wailing Wall is a remaining part of what they call the last temple...This temple was built by Herod, who, BTW, was an Idumean not a 'Jew', and was the temple that Jesus threw threw the merchants out of, correct?

OK...Now, from what I have read of the history of Jerusalem, this 'wailing wall' was never a part of the temple at all, but was only a part of a structure that was used to store supplies and such for the Roman garrison there, at the bottom of the temple mount...This wall was the only part of any building connected to the mount that was left standing after Vespusian's son Titus destroyed the city and plowed everything under...With me so far?

Or is the 'wailing wall' actually part of a later pagan temple?

Where I was trying to take this is that the Second Temple became superfluous after the arrival of Jesus Christ.  He was the "Temple" now and for all eternity.   The remaining parts of the wailing wall are parts of the rebuilt pagan temples.  All of what is called the "Temple" by Jews is a disgusting object, an "abomination". They are worshipping "dead" stones like most of the Pagans have done throughout human history. Indeed much of what is the basis of what is to become the third temple is a foundation of a Pagan Temple -- I think to Jupiter.   The Jews are waiting for a "worldly" messiah to take control over the earth -- as per Babylonian Talmudism.  I believe this ties with their objectives in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion -- everything for themselves in "this" world.  This also ties with the Masons -- who seek to rebuild a "Christ-less" style temple in the middle-east in the manner of fallen King Solomon -- built for the now and forever "Pagan" Jews.  What they don't realize is that the Third Temple has already "risen".  

III. Jesus Christ, the New Temple


Giotto, Casting Out the Money Changers (14th century).
Jesus Christ IS the LORD of host.  And He fulfills the prophesies in Haggai 2:1-9 and Malachi 3:1 by visiting the Second Temple in Person.   He first went as an Infant, where He's blessed by Simeon (Luke 2:27-35), and by the age of twelve, it was here that He taught the scholars of the law (Lk. 2:46-47).  As an adult, He purified the Temple, and in the process, referred to the Temple as "My House" (Matthew 21:12-13).  He then proceeded to teach from the Temple courts (Mt. 21:23).  Because this is the Temple that the Incarnate Christ frequented, it possessed the Glory of the LORD in a way that the first Temple didn't.

But even as He purifies and glorifies the Second Temple, He shows Himself to be the greater Temple: the One that Ezekiel prophesied.  He returns to this theme repeatedly.  In Matthew 12:6, He makes the shocking claim, "I tell you that something greater than the temple is here" before declaring Himself "Lord of the Sabbath" (Mt. 12:.  It's hard for modern readers to get just how shocking this claim is, but consider this: when Christ foretells the destruction of the Second Temple, the Disciples assume He's referring to His Second Coming at the end of the world (Mt. 24:1-3).

The most important of the claims Christ makes about Himself as the Temple is found in John 2:18-22,

The Jews then responded to him, "What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?"

    Jesus answered them, "Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days."

    They replied, "It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?" But the temple he had spoken of was his body. After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

This claim that would be used at Jesus' trial to condemn Him for blasphemy, with the (Jewish) speakers claiming that Jesus had actually threatened to destroy the Temple Himself (Matthew 26:59-61).  And it was for this claim that He was mocked from the Cross (Mt. 27:40).

But this notion that Jesus' Body is the New Temple is an incredible one.  We see it all over the place, once we know to look for it.  For example, when Jesus died on the Cross, the veil of the Second Temple was torn in two (Matthew 27:51, Mark 15:38, Luke 23:45).  Hebrews 10:20 specifically cites to this torn veil as a symbol of the opening of Heaven, in that "we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the Blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain, that is, His Body."  So that's yet another image of Christ as the New Temple.

http://catholicdefense.blogspot.com/201 ... emple.html


The sequence from Herod's Temple, to Temple of Jupiter, to Dome of the Rock (please overlook the "Hitler-holohoax" theme mentioned below--CSR):

From 2 Macc 6, we learn that in 167 BC, Antiochus IV Epiphanes attacked Jerusalem setting up a temple to Jupiter and offering pig sacrifices. He ordered the Jews to worship idols and stop keeping the Sabbath and practicing circumcision. A major theme in 2 Macc is that the Jews triumph over Antiochus in the end and regain control of the temple again.

After Titus destroyed the Temple in 70 AD, Hadrian became Caesar in 117 - 138 AD. Hadrian, revisits the actions of he predecessor Antiochus IV Epiphanes and sets up a Temple of Jupiter on the Temple mount, ordering circumcision to cease and expelling the Jews from Jerusalem altogether. He not only made himself the object of worship in this temple, but made Jerusalem the capital city of the Roman world for the worship of Jupiter. He also built an temple to Jupiter in Baalbek, Lebanon that is still standing today. Just as Hitler deceived British Prime Minister Chamberlain in 1938 AD that there would be "peace in our time", so too Hadrian deceived the Jews to believe that he was peacefully rebuilding the Jewish Temple, when in fact he was constructing the world headquarters "Temple of Jupiter". As construction began, the Jews probably even helped in thankfulness and praise to Hadrian. But when the Jews finally learned of Hadrian's true intent, as did England learn of Hitler's, they rebelled and a huge war broke out in 132 AD where 85 major Jewish towns were destroyed and 580,000 Jewish men were killed. The false promises of peace of Hadrian and Hitler both resulted in major holocausts against the Jews. Israel came to the promised land with about 600,000 men and they were finally expelled from the land by having about 600,000 men killed by Hadrian. The Temple of Jupiter was completed on the temple mount in 135 AD and was the most important (Jupiter Capitolinus) "Temple to Jupiter" in the world. While the Jews of Hadrian's time may have been looking for the story of 2 Maccabees conclude with a similar victory for the Jews, Hadrian was likely reminded of the same 2 Macc. text to make sure the ending was different.

The Temple in Jerusalem over the threshing floor which is presently under the Al Kas fountain.

(Some interesting points below but taken from a "Christian True J-Tribe Believer" (CTJTB) )

Introduction:

Solomon built the temple on the threshing floor David bought. The Dome of the rock is the highest point of the temple mount. Threshing floors were never built on hills, but in curved valleys, like directly under the Al Kas Fountain. Under the dome of the Rock, was where the Fortress of Antonia stood. In 135 AD, Hadrian filled in about 50 feet of earth over top of where the temple stood and enlarged the temple mount and built a temple of Jupiter where we see the Dome of the rock today. In 325 AD Constantine tore down the Temple of Jupiter and assumed Hadrian built the temple of Jupiter on top of the spot where the temple of Solomon once stood. Constantine built an octagon church on the site. In 700 AD the Muslims found the foundations of Constantine's octagon church and built the dome of the Rock we see today.
"On the Temple Mount he (Hadrian) erected a temple to Jupiter with an equestrian statue of himself in front of it." (The temple of Jerusalem, Joan Comay, 1975, p199)
Where was the threshing floor on the temple mount?
Tuvia Sagiv's theory focuses on Hadrian building a Temple of Jupiter on the temple mount in 135 AD. Hadrian had built many large scale projects including the Jupiter on the Temple in Baalbek, Lebanon, that is still standing to this day. Sagiv, being an architect by trade, noticed that both the Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek and the Islamic buildings we see on the temple mount today, were almost an exact match in both design and scale. The similarity between a hexagon shaped Jupiter "Forecourt" with the Dome of the Rock and the Jupiter Temple with the Al-Aqsa mosque is nothing short of stunning.

Detailed high resolution photos of the Temple of Jupiter in Baalbek, Lebanon.

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=14890&hilit=Temple+Solomon#p61800

5.) The second Hebrew Temple was built by Herod, King of Judea over the remains of Nehemiah's Temple. This Temple was larger than the previous Temples, and to accommodate its expanded foundations and the greatly increased size of the Temple Mount, a massive retaining wall was built on the southwest side of the Temple Mount. Herod was of Edomite descent, though of Hebrew (Judaic) face. In 40 BC. he was appointed as King of Judea and governor of Galilee by the Roman Senate. When the Roman Titus crushed the Hebrew Revolt and destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. they razed the temple to the ground. While nothing remains of the temple itself, large portions of the enclosure (re- taining) walls still remains. The most famous remnants are the lower portions of the Western Wall, known as the Wailing Wall. Modern archeological research confirms that the alleged Solomon Temple, as it described in the Old Testament, bears unmistakable resemblance to the actual Temple in Uru-Salem (Jerusalem) built by the Phoenicians for the Jebusites' Sun God.

6.) In 638 AD. the Muslim caliph Omar I. entered Jerusalem and during the period from 685 to 691 the 10th Caliph Abd-el-Malik ibn Marwan built the Dome of the Rock right over the foun- dation of the ancient Jebusites' Temple. Other Islamic shrine on the Temple Mount is the al-Aqsa Mosque (one of Islam's largest and holiest mosques) was built 715 AD. on the southwest side of the Temple Mount. The Great Constantine (306 to 337 AD.) and his mother built a few churches there. A few churches remained intact, also a few ruins can be found there. The present Western Wall or Wailing Wall formed no part any of the previous temples. All that remains of the elaborate structure is part of the retaining wall. Then as now, it was merely a retaining structure for Temple Mount. Where are the ruins of King Solomon's Temple?

Story on the Rothschilds, Masons, and Hiram Abiff... the Eye of Horus has been incorporated into Pagan-Jew buildings in Israel. If one looks very carefully at modern "Judaism"... it is a strange religion that has features of ancient "Baal-Astarte-Jupiter" worship particularly in the Kabballah's Tree of Life which is thoroughly "pagan". The Talmud is the codification of  ancient pagan "temple" rulership over the beasts (people) in the fields surrounding the "temple". Jews have structured themselves around preserving an elite "pagan-priestly" class like in ancient Babylonia...(finance, law, politics, teaching...to name a few)... --CSR

Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the major banking family, and supporter of Freemasons and the French Revolution was Jewish. The Blue Lodge and Scottish Rite degrees used in the lodges were Christian in nature. This created problems for all the leading bankers, including the Rothschilds, and the other emancipated Jews who may have wanted to participate. To solve the dilemma, effort were made to change the rituals in order to make Freemasonry acceptable to Jews. From the Old Testament King Solomon's Temple was accepted as the birthplace of Free- masonry. The accepted change created three Grand Masters, based upon a literal interpretation of an allegory, which is central to the initiation ritual of a Master Mason. The three Grand Masters of the Masonic Order: the mythical King Solomon, Hiram, King of Tyre, and a mythical Hiram, called "Hiram Abiff." This changes created two more problems; 1./ In Masonic ritual the master builder, Hiram Abiff is murdered and the Temple of Solomon is never finished, while the biblical account says that the temple was indeed finished and Hiram the metalworker went home, alive and well. 2./ In the ritual, Hiram Abiff murdered because he didn't divulge the "Master's World" (secret of the Master Mason) to the three Fellow Crafts. In the Blue Lodge, where the Master representing King Solomon, agrees with King Hiram (Senior Warden) that "Mah-Hah-Bone" shall be used as a substitute for the "lost Master's World" until wiser ages shall discover the true one. Freemasons has never possessed the "lost world". The adepts of various countries, a limited num- ber among the chiefs of the Templars, some Rosicrucians and Arabian alchemist could really had possession of the Secret World. The substitute for the "lost world" is a modern invention. "Maha" in Sanskrit signifies "great", what the mysterious Eastern Brothers used in their initiation and ceremonies. "Bone" came from the French "bon" (good). The two words had combined together; it is meaningless!

Hiram Abiff was a symbolic representative of Osiris, the Egyptian god of death and rebirth. The Mysteries of Osiris formed the third degree or summit of the Egyptian Initiation. In the third de- gree of Freemasonry the candidate impersonates Hiram Abiff. A very limited knowledge of the history is necessery to enable any person to recognize in the Grand Master Hiram Abiff, the Osi- ris of the Egyptians, the Mithras of the Persians, the Christ of the Greeks, the Dionysus of the Fraternity of the Artificers and the Atys of the Phrygians. Hiram Abiff was the son of the priest King of Astarte/Adonis - Hiram, king of Tyre. Abiff means "of" or "from" my Father. He was a member of the Dionysian Architects, who first appeared around 1,000 BC. when the Jebusites' Temple at Uru Salem was being erected. Not King Solomon's Temple! He was a wor- shipper of the Goddess Astarte and was responsible for designing her Temples in Tyre, Phoenicia. The Roman architect and master builder Vitrivius (1st century AD.) was the last initiated member of the Dionysian Architects. Hiram, King of Tyre have been a priest king of the cult of Astarte. He was the Grand Master of the Dionysian Architects. The name Hiram was understood by the early Freemasons as an anagram. It meant: Homo Iesus Redemptor AnimaruM (Jesus a man, redeemer of souls). Others explained the name: Homo Iesus Rex Altissimus Mundi (Jesus a man, king of the highest world)

[FrankDialogue]

Where I was trying to take this is that the Second Temple became superfluous after the arrival of Jesus Christ.  He was the "Temple" now and for all eternity.   The remaining parts of the wailing wall are parts of the rebuilt pagan temples.  All of what is called the "Temple" by Jews is a disgusting object, an "abomination". They are worshipping "dead" stones like most of the Pagans have done throughout human history. Indeed much of what is the basis of what is to become the third temple is a foundation of a Pagan Temple -- I think to Jupiter.   The Jews are waiting for a "worldly" messiah to take control over the earth -- as per Babylonian Talmudism.  I believe this ties with their objectives in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion -- everything for themselves in "this" world.  This also ties with the Masons -- who seek to rebuild a "Christ-less" style temple in the middle-east in the manner of fallen King Solomon -- built for the now and forever "Pagan" Jews.  What they don't realize is that the Third Temple has already "risen".  

OK, we're on the same page...I haven't spent too much time on the temple issue lately, but I read extensively on it around 2007, and I still find it fascinating at times...Certainly, no structure build by man has any inherent holiness in God's eyes.

I read an incredible account of the siege of Jerusalem (70 AD siege) back around 2007 by a British writer; wonderfully written, not infected by Jewish propaganda, and fully documented, but I cannot find it anywhere on the web, as I forget the author's name...Now, all you find as you go through the google pages are Jew interpretations, or 'Zionist-Christian' perspectives...Jewgle filters their searches quite thoroughly, making any older anti-Jewish historical material (and there is plenty) quite difficult to find...I wish that I had this British writer's account to link to..

Thanks for all your research links.  

Oh yes, and 'the Protocols'?

They are just an extension of the Talmud, or in modern terms you could call them a 'position paper' from a Jewish think tank...The most disgusting thing about them is at the end where they talk about their 'god', who is never identified.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Related but dated:

[youtube:1nbk1jr2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wA-DnAmECE8[/youtube]1nbk1jr2]

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Merry Christmas!!!  

[FrankDialogue]

Merry Christmas!!!  

Same to you & yours...