Jew'Bama "Unchained": a Descendant of Slaves

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Still a Jew slave IMHO....--CSR

---------------

 Obama Descendant Of African Slave, According To Genealogy Research

Posted: 07/30/2012 6:54 pm Updated: 07/30/2012 6:58 pm

Barack Obama

The ancestry website Ancestry.com revealed an interesting new wrinkle Monday into President Barack Obama's roots, announcing that he is a descendant of the first African documented slave.

The connection comes from the lineage of his Caucasian mother from Kansas.

Obama's ancestor, John Punch, came to Virginia sometime before 1640 as a slave. That year, he was captured in Maryland trying to escape, and brought back to Virginia where a court ordered him into permanent slavery. Punch had children with a white woman who passed her "free "status along to their offspring, who later became successful landowners.

Researchers from Ancestry.com, an online-centralized company in Provo, Utah, specializing in family-tree exploration, said the evidence "strongly suggests" that Punch fathered John Bunch. Punch was traced back to be Obama's great-grandfather several generations before the president's birth.

The site points out that Punch and Bunch are the only ones with similar surnames out of fewer than 100 people in Virginia. Despite the difference in surname, researchers note that there was no standardized spelling of names during that period. The children of John Bunch III, who was born between 1680-1685, freely married into white families.

Elizabeth Shown Mills, a genealogist who reviewed the site's findings, said tracing of the Y-chromosome to African origin is "indisputable."

"Genealogical research on individuals who lived hundreds of years ago can never definitively prove that one man fathered another, but this research meets the highest standards and can be offered with confidence," she said.

Obama's mother, who was white, was born in Kansas and his father was from Kenya; Obama was also raised in part by his mother's parents. He grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia.

"John Punch was more than likely the genesis of legalized slavery in America. But after centuries of suffering, the Civil War, and decades of civil rights efforts, his 11th great-grandson became the leader of the free world and the ultimate realization of the American Dream," said Ancestry.com genealogist Joseph Shumway.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/3 ... 21158.html

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Good notes here from IrishSavant:

---------

Friday, 28 December 2012

Ramping up for a race war?

"The Individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it"  It was J Edgar Hoover who said it, back in 1956. I'm not sure what he had in mind but whatever it was could not have been more apposite that what we see today. I've been observing, with an ever-increasing sense of disbelief, the descent of the US into what looks increasingly like a South American police state. But now I'm coming to the conclusion that it's actually much worse than that. I find it increasingly difficult to avoid the Hoover Conclusion...that there's a conspiracy so monstrous I can hardly believe it exists.

In this post I outlined some of the shocking measures being taken in this direction. But what tips me over into Hoover territory are the following:

Fact 1: There's been a vigorous campaign for the de facto repeal of the 2nd Amendment. This has gone into frenzied overdrive following the Sandy Hook school shooting.

Fact 2: The Department of Homeland  'Security' has requisitioned  650 million rounds of .40 calibrehollow point ammunition. Er, 'homeland' security?  Also that the US military are training to take on crowds of American citizens in a time of crisis.

Fact 3: While making strenuous efforts to disarm legal (read White) gun owners the Administration has now made it easier for immigrants to acquire them!  Can you credit that?

How, in the light of these three Facts, can we avoid concluding that TPTB anticipate the equivalent of a race war and furthermore that they are actively arming one set of potential combatants while attempting to disarm the other?   It's not an unreasonable conclusion, is it?

Which in turn begs the question 'why'?

We can take it as given that they want to destroy White Christian America. But they're well on their way to doing that anyway as it stands. And Whites make hardly a whimper as they're lead to their destruction. Indeed vast numbers enthusiastically support the process.

So do TPTB anticipate the worm turning?  Do they know that an economic catastrophe is on the way, one so severe that it will awaken the spirit of Odin in the Sleeping White Giant before he's been demographically rendered impotent?

Posted by SAVANT at 21:08 20 comments:

http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/?zx=9a5aa68b2533cfcb

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Golden Globe Awards: Christoph Waltz of 'Django Unchained' wins Supporting Actor - Drama

Quentin Tarantino's film "Django Unchained" stars Jamie Foxx as the title character, an African-American slave who is bought by Waltz' character, a bounty hunter known to most as a dentist named Dr. King Schultz. They strike a deal in which Django will help him with his work and in exchange, Schultz will help him find and free his wife, Broomhilda, played by Kerry Washington, from an evil plantation owner, played by DiCaprio.

Waltz won his first Golden Globe as well as his first Oscar for his role as a Nazi officer in Tarantino's 2009 film "Inglorious Basterds."  

"Django Unchained: earned five Golden Globe nominations, including Best Director and Best Screenplay.

The movie has stirred controversy over not only its sensitive subject matter, but its repeated use of a racial slur throughout the film. Director Spike Lee, a longtime advocate of civil rights known for helming the 1992 film "Malcolm X," said in December that he would boycott the movie, adding on his Twitter page: "American Slavery Was Not A Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western.It Was A Holocaust.My Ancestors Are Slaves.Stolen From Africa.I Will Honor Them. (sic)"

http://www.ontheredcarpet.com/Golden-Gl ... ma/8953231

[Michael K.]

Irish Savant wrote:

How, in the light of these three Facts, can we avoid concluding that TPTB anticipate the equivalent of a race war and furthermore that they are actively arming one set of potential combatants while attempting to disarm the other? It's not an unreasonable conclusion, is it?

Which in turn begs the question 'why'?

We can take it as given that they want to destroy White Christian America. But they're well on their way to doing that anyway as it stands. And Whites make hardly a whimper as they're lead to their destruction. Indeed vast numbers enthusiastically support the process.

So do TPTB anticipate the worm turning? Do they know that an economic catastrophe is on the way, one so severe that it will awaken the spirit of Odin in the Sleeping White Giant before he's been demographically rendered impotent?

Wrong answer; partially correct IMO.  The given assumption that they want to destroy White Christian America we can agree to, but what does that really mean?  Race war ("Helter Skelter"), as bad as it is, could be for the purposes only of dissolving whatever now exists in terms of Christian good will and good neighbors.  That either the "Germanic Death Cult [sic]" or the Zionists, or The Jews would envision a future with gangs of primitives armed to the hilt and running the streets everywhere, is inconceivable.

ORDO AB CHAOS means to temporarily unleash the pent-up primitive racial/social unconscious, in order plow the field under, and then to re-seed with a new order.  The end result of "niggers gone wild [sic]" could well mean their complete destruction, if only by the massive armed power of Eurasians who psychologically reject all Blacks, should they play the role of "peacekeeper", invited in to save White civilization.  It would be "a Maypole dance across niggers' asses for Odin."  But it would mean the destruction of White Christian America.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Jew'Bama does the    "mast'ah"....    --CSR

Obama push for assault weapons ban, other gun laws faces steep climb in Congress

By David Lightman 
and Anita Kumar
McClatchy Newspapers
Published: January 15, 2013 - 10:47 PM

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama is expected to unveil a series of tough new initiatives today aimed at curbing violence in America, including an assault weapons ban, but his major legislative proposals might face a difficult time in a reluctant Congress.

Many of the more ambitious plans, such as the assault-weapons ban, may not even get to a vote in the Republican-run House of Representatives. Others include limiting the capacity of ammunition clips and requiring background checks for every gun purchase, regardless of where it occurs.

But Obama, aiming to seize momentum with the nation still reeling from the Dec. 14 elementary school shootings in Connecticut, intends to try.

"He will broadly address the steps forward that he believes we need to take as a nation to try to reduce the scourge of gun violence in this country," White House spokesman Jay Carney said. "He believes we need to act now."

The president will be joined at the midday White House announcement by Vice President Joe Biden, his point person on the issue, and children who wrote to him after the shooting in Newtown, Conn. Gun control activists and lawmakers also have been invited. His proposals will include executive actions that don't need congressional approval, as well as legislation.

Congress offered mixed reactions Tuesday.

Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., is the kind of lawmaker Obama would need to get strict gun-control initiatives enacted. A National Rifle Association member, he voted against the assault-weapons ban in the 1990s, and said, "At this point, no," when he was asked whether one could pass the House now.

But Rahall, like many like-minded Democrats and Republicans, is willing to listen in the wake of the massacre at Newtown's Sandy Hook Elementary School, and other incidents.

"The Saturday morning after Sandy Hook, we woke up a different nation," said Rahall, who has been a member of Congress since the mid-1970s.  

The chief roadblock to major gun-control legislation is likely to come from Republicans, who control the House. Party leaders said they were unlikely to act until the Senate approved such a measure.

Though Democrats control 55 of the Senate's 100 seats, gun control won't be easy there, either.

"Is it something that can pass the Senate? Maybe. Is it something that can pass the House? I doubt it," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, discussing the assault ban last weekend on PBS.

Carney said that Obama "believes and knows that most all gun owners are highly responsible, they buy their guns legally, and they use them safely. He also has seen and believes that most gun owners support the idea of common-sense measures to prevent people who shouldn't have guns from getting them."

Other items that have been under consideration include: improved database tracking for weapons sales; better enforcement of existing laws, including tougher prosecution of people who lie on their background checks; imposing new limits on imported guns; and allowing the sharing of mental-health records.

New law in New York

Jumping out ahead of Washington, New York state enacted the nation's toughest gun restrictions Tuesday and the first since the Connecticut shootings.

Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the measure into law less than an hour after it won final passage in the legislature, with supporters hailing it as a model for the nation and gun-rights activists condemning it as a knee-jerk piece of legislation that won't make anyone safer and is too extreme to win support in the rest of the country.

"Common sense can win," Cuomo said. "You can overpower the extremists with intelligence and with reason and with common sense."  

Owners of an estimated 1 million previously legal semiautomatic rifles, such as the Bushmaster model used to kill 20 children and six adults in Newtown, will be allowed to keep their weapons but will have a year to register them with police. The sale of any more such weapons is prohibited.

In addition to outlawing a broader array of military-style weapons, the measure restricts ammunition magazines to seven rounds, down from the current 10, creates a more comprehensive database of people barred from owning guns, and makes New York the first state to require background checks to buy bullets. The system will also help flag customers who buy large amounts of ammo.

In another provision, therapists, doctors and other mental health professionals will be required to tell state authorities if a patient threatens to use a gun illegally. The patient's weapon could then be taken away.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.ohio.com/news/nation/obama-p ... s-1.365356