Corrupting Jew Arie Perliger: Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s ... Far-Right

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

This Idiot Jew at the CTC (Combating Terrorism Center) calls traditional White males potential "Domestic Terrorists"  and then wants the US military and police to track and detain them apparently.  Typical Bolshevik J-Sh*te.  The interesting fact is that he also wrote a book on Jewish Terrorism in the Middle East. It seems like he's projecting "Jew Terrorist crimes" on the America's Far-Right and doesn't account for the Ugly Protocolist Jews behind the Multi-culturalization of the US-Canada over the last 45+ years.

It appears that Perliger is just another typical scamming academic Jew trying to make up a drama and start "policy" to hide the collective J-Tribe ripoff of global Goyim via Bond Usury and the Idiot Jew Stealing of Palestinian Land, IMHO.  This isn't the "Illumanti" -  this is the G*dDamned Jews....who want to "criminalize" Europeans for non-Jew P.C.  politics. (Blacks attacked 10,000s of people last year with 1,000s of them Black on White crimes in the US-Canada, but this Jew wants to point at 300 people attacked by the Far-Right.)  -- CSR

---------

http://anonym.to/?http://www.ctc.usma.e ... elines.pdf

Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America's Violent Far-Right
Jan 15, 2013
Author:    Arie Perliger  

In the last few years, and especially since 2007, there has been a dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self-identify with the far-right of American politics. These incidents cause many to wonder whether these are isolated attacks, an increasing trend, part of increasing societal violence, or attributable to some other condition. To date, however, there has been limited systematic documentation and analysis of incidents of American domestic violence.

This study provides a conceptual foundation    for understanding different far-right groups and then presents the empirical analysis of violent incidents to identify those perpetrating attacks and their associated trends. Through a comprehensive look at the data, this study addresses three core questions:

(1) What are the main current characteristics of the violence produced by the far right?

(2) What type of far-right groups are more prone than others to engage in violence? How are characteristics of particular far-right groups correlated with their tendency to engage in violence?

(3) What are the social and political factors associated with the level of far-right violence? Are there political or social conditions that foster or discourage violence?

It is important to note that this study concentrates on those individuals and groups who have actually perpetuated violence and is not a comprehensive analysis of the political causes with which some far-right extremists identify. While the ability to hold and appropriately articulate diverse political views is an American strength, extremists committing acts of violence in the name of those causes undermine the freedoms that they purport to espouse

The following is an interview with Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger, authors of Jewish Terrorism in Israel.

Q:  What led you to this topic?

Ami Pedahzur:  We    have both studied political extremism and violence for many years. Together we have devoted a lot of time to understanding the underlying causes of terrorism in general and of religious terrorism in particular. When former prime minister Ariel Sharon announced his plan to remove Jewish settlements from the Gaza strip, we felt that Israeli society was entering a tense historical moment. Because of this we just wanted to be on the ground, documenting events as they unfolded and trying to understand the mechanisms that lead groups and individuals to extreme manifestations of political violence.  

Q. How did you conduct the research?

Ari Perliger:  We started by spending a large part of the summer of 2005, in which the withdrawal took place, among Jewish settlers in Gaza and the West Bank, including the settlements marked for removal. We interviewed the activists who gathered there and followed events as they reached their boiling point. Later, when things calmed down, we took a broader perspective on the phenomenon of Jewish terrorism in Israel. We collected archival materials and interviewed both convicted terrorists and members of the security establishment who put them behind bars. We were thus were able to come up with a detailed description of the phenomenon of Jewish terrorism since the early days of the twentieth century. Finally, we constructed three databases. The first includes a detailed account of every terrorist attack perpetrated by Jews in Palestine and later in Israel. The second contains detailed biographies of the perpetrators, and the third offers a map of the ties among and across various terrorist networks. We believe that the unprecedented access we had to both historical and quantitative data and the careful analysis we conducted allowed us not only to better understand the phenomenon of Jewish terrorism in Israel but also to offer a theory regarding the causes and processes that lead to the radicalization and the eruption of violence among religious countercultures in other parts of the world.

Q: So what are your main conclusions?

AP: This study corroborates the argument that religion by itself is not a source of violence. However, when it becomes politicized, religion can become a fertile breeding ground for countercultures like totalitarian political ideologies such as fascism and communism. Most countercultures never become violent. It takes a major threat to the community of believers or to its most sacred values to radicalize its members. A minority of them will be pushed over the edge and perpetrate terrorist acts for the purpose of removing the threats.

Q:  Lately, a lot has been written on religious terrorism. Could you outline, in a nutshell, the new insights that this book offers?

AP: As we indicated earlier, we contend that the real divisions in the world are not between civilizations and religions but rather between moderates and extremists. We also concluded that many terrorist acts are not generated by organizational frameworks but by more elusive social configurations based on primal ties such as kinship and friendship. One of the most stunning findings in the book is that the most sophisticated terrorist group in Israel's history, which is known as the "Jewish Underground," exhibited no features of a terrorist organization. It was rather an extended social network that included many subgroups operating independently at different times and in different locations. There was no leader or central command. The first time many of the alleged members of the underground met was in court, following their arrest.  

Q: What can you say about the "profile" of the Jewish terrorist?

AP:  The overwhelming majority of the terrorists were young religious males, yet these facts alone are too simplistic a description. If we were asked by an intelligence service how to profile a potential terrorist, we would probably have recommended looking at the bigger picture. Instead of identifying potential individual terrorists on the basis of their of their socio- demographic or religious proclivities, we believe the focus should be on radical communities in times of crises. Once such a community is identified, the next step should be concentrating on networks of friends who are highly invested in the struggle, meet frequently, and have access to weapons. As with criminal street gangs, the turn to terrorism is gradual and involves a process of socialization within a close-knit network. Very few of the Jewish terrorists were lone wolves operating on their own. The majority, including Yigal Amir, the assassin of prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, were radicalized and developed their tactics through a peer socialization  process.    

Q: To conclude, what can this book tell us about the shape of things to come?

AP: We believe that history can tell us a lot. We open the book by describing Jewish terrorism in ancient times, and, unfortunately, in the ensuing two thousand years little has changed. Over the last forty years extremists have created a religious Jewish counterculture, especially in the West Bank but also in Orthodox pockets inside Israel. Though we are not anticipating removal of more settlements in the near future, we are confident that this day will come, and once it does, the escalation of violence will be dramatic. Terrorist networks will do anything to prevent the government from interfering with what they perceive as the promise of the lord to the Jewish people, even if the toll in human lives is very high.

http://cup.columbia.edu/static/ami-peda ... -interview

Conservatives Don't Like This West Point Report on America's Violent Far-Right
 
Reuters

David Wagner 2,068 Views Jan 18, 2013

Aren't conservatives supposed to be hawkish on terror? They tend to be when it comes to foreign terrorists, but many are taking umbrage at a new West Point report on violent far-right extremists home-grown right here in the U.S. Earlier this week, the Combatting Terrorism Center (CTC) at America's leading military academy published an extensive report on the "dramatic rise in the number of attacks and violent plots originating from individuals and groups who self-identify with the far-right of American politics." Christian fundamentalists, Militia movement groups, Skinheads, neo-Nazis, and violent anti-abortionists were all cited in the report, titled Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America's Violent Far-Right. These factions may harbor different ideological goals, but as this chart shows, they've all ramped up their violent tactics in trying to achieve them:

"Although in the 1990s the average number of attacks per year was 70.1, the average number of attacks per year in the first 11 years of the twenty-first century was 307.5, a rise of more than 400%,"

 writes Dr. Arie Perliger, Director of Terrorism Studies at the CTC.  

In short, this report makes a convincing case about extremists trying to inflict harm upon innocent Americans, and it's full of alarming data and clear policy recommendations. Conservatives love appealing to these kinds of studies when arguing that we need to get tough on terror, right? Well, not in this case. One Republican congressional staffer—who thinks only Muslims can be terrorists—told The Washington Times' Rowan Scarborough:

If [the Defense Department] is looking for places to cut spending, this junk study is ground zero. Shouldn't the Combating Terrorism Center be combating radical Islam around the globe instead of perpetuating the left's myth that right-wingers are terrorists?

The National Review's John Fund also wants to change the subject to terrorists in other parts of the world:

The world is beset by terrorists—witness the American hostages taken in Algeria this week—but portions of our federal government continue to obsess about alleged home-grown threats from the "far right" ... My sources inside Congress tell me they continue to worry that efforts to monitor domestic Muslim extremists as well as interdiction efforts against radical Islamists crossing the U.S. border are sometimes put on the back burner. The government denies this, but it seems to me its protestations would be more persuasive if it spent less time producing half-baked warnings about the danger of "right-wing extremists."

World Net Daily's Michael Carl extensively quotes blogger    Pamela Geller  in his article on the report. "This is another appalling attempt to demonize loyal Americans and whitewash the Islamic threat," Geller says. "West Point probably is working on orders from higher ups. Or else it has bought into the dominant PC culture." Over at Newsmax, Christiana Lilly buries the lede—turning a story about far-right terrorists into a story about liberals (see how .... clever these Idiot J-Tribers are...--CSR ) :

    The U.S. Military Academy at West Point released a paper calling far right groups anti-federalists while describing liberals as "future oriented," the Washington Times reports.

And yes, you better believe Drudge sirened it:  

  DRUDGE REPORT @DRUDGE_REPORT

    West Point cites dangers of 'anti-federalists' in U.S.... drudge.tw/WnbwBW

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national ... ght/61181/

------------

Friday, November 27, 2009
Lesson from the Irgun: terror works

Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger have written an interesting book called "Jewish Terrorism in Israel". No one group can lay claim to the methods and tactics of terror, but the Irgun still looms large as lesson givers.  

...and their young leader from 1943-48, Menachem Begin, has a legacy still influential in Israeli politics...after all, the Party he founded (Likud) rules today.

Bring the terror of war directly to the civilian populace, directly to the enemy's compound, strike with indiscriminate lethal methods, create fear, and operate outside the rule of law. These seem to be lessons learned by many. In the case of Menachem Begin, the lesson is that unorthodox methods while criminal can in fact lead a path to eventual legitimacy and the creation of a state. We cannot rewrite history or hide this particular narrative...it is. The Irgun was to the British Forces in Palestine a criminal ruthless element. Use the irrelevant label terrorists if you desire. The Irgun was fighting for statehood.

These methods are carried out by people and it is in examining the people where Doctors Pedahzur (professor at Univ. Texas, Austin) and Perlinger (professor at State Univ. of NY, Stony Brook) have made this subject of terrorism a personified concept. When people marginalize themselves from society or as in Begin's case as a young man, become marginalized based upon events, desperation fuels extreme behaviors. Social networking is a new Internet buzzword, perhaps, but the concept helps to explain terror cells and how fundamentally, they are groups of like minded people with similar experiences. Their book goes far beyond examining the Irgun but subsequent movements have a definite thread to the influential early organization.

Terror works. It's hard to convince people otherwise. One wonders if Yasser Arafat as a young man learned from his enemy, Begin. Did Arafat learn from the Algerians success against the French? Did the Algerians learn from the Irgun? Did Shamil Basayev of Chechnya learn from Begin? Did the French Maquis (Resistance) influence the bomb makers of the Irgun? Maybe this artform was born in Ireland with Michael Collins' flying columns of 1916? It all worked.

There's much written today about counterinsurgency. We'll probably hear President Obama give us a lesson next week...a teachable moment, but this complex formula for success, terrorism, as horrendous as it is, has more to teach us. Like nuclear weapons, methods of terror create fear and uncertainty and influence politics. And as long as world powers continue to kill civilians with conventional forces, the insurgents will have ample recruiting posters. What do these fighters want?

The Irgun's successful operations against the British, '44-48, during the Mandate in Palestine remain an influential lesson for Israelis as well as those who would wish them harm.  

Jewish Terrorism in Israel

Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger
November, 2009
Cloth, 264 pages, 3 figures
ISBN: 978-0-231-15446-8

http://crossroadscurrents.blogspot.com/ ... works.html

[0th0d0xypr0xy]

This Idiot Jew at the CTC (Combating Terrorism Center) calls traditional White males potential "Domestic Terrorists"  and then wants the US military and police to track and detain them apparently.  Typical Bolshevik J-Sh*te.  The interesting fact is that he also wrote a book on Jewish Terrorism in the Middle East. It seems like he's projecting "Jew Terrorist crimes" on the America's Far-Right and doesn't account for the Ugly Protocolist Jews behind the Multi-culturalization of the US-Canada over the last 45+ years.

It appears that Perliger is just another typical scamming academic Jew trying to make up a drama and start "policy" to hide the collective J-Tribe ripoff of global Goyim via Bond Usury and the Idiot Jew Stealing of Palestinian Land, IMHO.  This isn't the "Illumanti" -  this is the G*dDamned Jews....who want to "criminalize" Europeans for non-Jew P.C.  politics. (Blacks attacked 10,000s of people last year with 1,000s of them Black on White crimes in the US-Canada, but this Jew wants to point at 300 people attacked by the Far-Right.)  -- CSR

I heard a similar from Charles Guiliani when he detailed a white couple being raped, sodomized and butchered:

[youtube:1t3ay6a8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btdya9uOA8Q[/youtube]1t3ay6a8]

However, I don't think the issue here should be race. As mgt23 said numerous times to hold white people above all else is Judaism for Europeans, true 'enlightened thinking' comes when you win an argument through sheer logic, reasoning and understanding (note: how Jews have come to dominate the academic field of linguistics - and also how unceasingly they are in their hounding of David Irving who speaks both with confidence and clarity to an ever-growing audience.) Anyhow, returning to my point. I don't think one should focus solely upon the injustice served by the Jews within America and Europe - traditional white nations. Rather, also too look at Palestine, the Gaza strip and the ongoing strife within Syria and consider to yourself this indeed an INTERNATIONAL conflict between INTERNATIONAL parasites upon the globe.

However, if you wish to seek pride in your race perhaps you should give this a watch:

[youtube:1t3ay6a8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ5jZzoqFCo[/youtube]1t3ay6a8]

He was a former KKK yet he saw the injustice within Palestine and went to Iran to defend the gentiles under threat of war by the International Jew.