Jewish Supremacists “Challenge America’s Family-Friendly Culture” by Being Delib

[Ognir]

Jewish Supremacists "Challenge America's Family-Friendly Culture" by Being Deliberately Obscene, says leading Jewish Academic
http://davidduke.com/jewish-supremacists-challenge-americas-family-friendly-culture-deliberately-obscene-says-leading-jewish-academic/

February 10, 2014 at 10:13 am

According to Haaretz newspaper in Israel, Jews in the "entertainment" industry are deliberately trying to destroy America's "family-friendly culture" by being as obscene as possible—an act which also allows them to:

"assert their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity"

Writing in an article in the Israeli Haaretz newspaper, Professor Josh Lambert, academic director of the Yiddish Book Center and visiting assistant professor of English at the University of Massachusetts,  said that "American Jews have found the explicit representation of sex, and four-letter words, so very useful. The answers vary: Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom."

In the article, titled "'Dirty Jews' and the Christian right", the Jewish professor goes on to say that;

"Brilliant actors like Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America's powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.

"In a tidy coincidence, two separate videos went viral last week, demonstrating that American Jews' love affair with obscenity is still going strong. Sarah Silverman talks about being visited by Jesus Christ, who asks her to spread a message about women's reproductive rights ("We've got to legislate that shit," the comedienne said, mocking conservatives who want to use the law to limit women's health care options), while a fan-produced supercut strung together three minutes of uninterrupted insults by Larry David on 'Curb Your Enthusiasm.'"

Professor Lambert goes on to claim that American Christians are behind all attempts to censor obscenity and to maintain family values—and that Jews are deliberately using pornography and obscenity to attack those values.

"So, who's behind the tightening of American obscenity laws in the 21st century? Like Anthony Comstock's crusade against smut in the late 19th century, this one is understood by many of its leaders as a Christian project,"

Professor Lambert writes.

Even those few Jews involved with anti-pornography crusade organizations are dismissed as "marginal" and as "Jewish crackpots."

"The contemporary Christian right has a much more complex and self-aware relationship with American Jews than its 19th-century predecessors did, though. So recent anti-porn campaigns have welcomed with open arms any Jews with compatible ideas, like Orthodox modesty crusader Wendy Shalit. Today's anti-porn organizations, even if funded by Christians, often seek out Jews to sit on their boards – though mostly they attract only very marginal rabbis and other Jewish crackpots," Professor Lambert said.

He goes on to assert that US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's earlier remark about the relative use of taboo language among Americans of different backgrounds was true in respect to Jews.

"He [Scalia] was rebutting a point from a dissenting opinion about how 'small-town broadcasters' would suffer unduly under the court's decision, because it would necessitate their purchase of expensive equipment to bowdlerize fleeting expletives during live broadcasts. These 'small-town broadcasters' would not suffer, Scalia countered, because their 'down-home local guests probably employ vulgarity less than big-city folks [and the] foul-mouthed glitterati from Hollywood.'

"Dirty words, Scalia declared absurdly, aren't a temptation for 'down-home,' 'small-town' American; they're only a 'big-city,' 'Hollywood' problem. Scalia did not, of course, go so far as to suggest that the one demographic group most insistently associated both with American 'big-city' life and with 'Hollywood' – Jews – tend to speak more obscenely than other Americans. If he had wanted to, though, he could not have a better illustration of his hypothesis than Larry David and Sarah Silverman," Professor Lambert wrote.

"These Christian campaigns against obscenity – and the vague, recrudescent sense promoted by Scalia's remark that the people using obscenity are not sufficiently Christian or authentically American – may help to explain why, in a media environment in which the representation of sex and the use of taboo language smacks increasingly of banality, brilliant performers like David and Silverman continue not only to assert their Jewishness emphatically, in virtually every one of their performances, but also to glory in and glorify the use of such language.

"Especially because the Christian right goes to such great lengths to demonstrate that Jews should not feel excluded from its initiatives – who loves Jews nowadays more than the Christian right, right? – identifying oneself as a 'dirty Jew' in 21st-century America is one way to signal your opposition not just to the banalities of the market-driven family-friendly culture, but also to the nation's most powerful socially, religiously and politically reactionary movement."

Observers cannot fail to point out that the Jewish Supremacist assault on "family values" in America is directly in contrast to the repeated calls in Israel to maintain their Jewishness, the calls for "Aliyah" to bolster the Jewish nature of the state, and the fact that their religious establishment rules that state with an iron fist and can even determine who can get married and not.

Imagine if Gentiles demanded to be let into Israel, and then systematically set about debasing, slandering Jewish "family values", and using obscenity to do so. What would these same Jewish Supremacists say then?

Would their professors still be writing books and articles in their newspapers boasting about how clever it is?

The answer is, as everyone knows, no. They would attack any Gentile who did such a thing as a "hater" or an "anti-Semite."

Once again, it is one rule for the Jewish Supremacists, and another for everyone else.

The Haaretz subtitle says it all really:

"asserting their Jewishness by promoting obscenity"

Any Gentile who said that Jews were promoting their Jewishness by promoting obscenity would be called an anti-Semitic hater, yet Jews can boast with unbridled chutzpah for their own people what other people cannot dare mention!

[yankeedoodle]

Of course, before Larry David and Sarah Silverman came the pioneer Howard Stern, the self-proclaimed "King of all Media" from New York.

Yankee Doodle is going to get VERY "big-city" - according to Scalia - and call  Stern a God-damned fucking useless piece of shit.

Yankee Doodle seems to remember that, years ago, he heard that this filth-for-money peddler has prim and proper parents in Brooklyn, or somewhere else in NYC, and that he is very respectful to them.  They must be very proud of their little Howie's great success offending the gentiles. 

[MikeWB]

These people are the cancer of society.

[Idaho Kid]

I keep this one up my sleeve for people who want more examples of systematic degradation and destruction of society by Jews:

Legendary Sin Cities Berlin

Great Jew language manipulation examples also! 

[maz]

Can anyone gauge how this information is being received by liberals and conservatives of the mainstream variety? To me, this is the Jews responding to us and basically laughing at our shortcomings at getting this kind of information to our friends and family.