Seymour Hersh tells the truth about the neocon jews

[yankeedoodle]

Back on  July 8, 2004, Seymour Hersh addressed the ACLU's 2004 Membership Conference, and spoke the truth about the neocon jews.

The Neocon Cult [1:16:47]

So, rather than deal with the obvious stuff about Bush and this election and what it means, I think the real question we have to answer, and this is the question I'm inchoate about, I don't have an answer ...

The question we have to say to ourselves is, ok, so here's what happens, a bunch of guys, 8 or 9 neoconservatives, cultists — not Charles Manson cultists, but cultists — get in and it's not, with all due respect to Michael Moore, and you'll read it, his movie's fine, but it's not about oil, it's not even about protecting Israel, it's about a Utopia they have, it's about an idea they have. Not only about — democracy can be spread — in a sense, I would say Paul Wolfowitz is the greatest Trotskyite of our time, he believes in permanent revolution, and in the Middle East to begin, needless to say.

And so you have a bunch of people who've been for 10, 12 years have been fantasizing since the 1991 Gulf War on the way to resolve problems. And of course Israel will be a beneficiary and etc. etc., but the world in their eyes — this was Utopia. And so they got together, this small group of cultists, and how did they do it? They did do it. They've taken the government over. And what's amazing to me, and what really is troubling, is how fragile our democracy is. Look what happened to us.

[In the press, there is] self-censorship, which is the beacon word for me, you know I always think it comes more, you know there is a corporate mentality out there, but there's also a tremendous amount of self-censorship among the press. It's like a disease.

But also — they not only — they took away the edge from the press, they also muzzled the bureaucracy, they muzzled the military, they muzzled the Congress, and it's an amazing feat. We're supposed to be a democratic society, and all of those areas of our democracy bowed and scraped to this group of neocons who advocated a policy.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6492.htm

[Idaho Kid]

Yankee, I've always wondered about Sy Hersch.  I don't think the handful of Jew-o-Cons orchestrated anything without permission from higher ups.  I don't think Wolfowitz et al can dictate to the Jew media.
I think this is Jews lying to Jews to assuage their guilty consciences.

[yankeedoodle]

Yankee Doodle has always regarded  Hersh as America-first - but, of course, he's of jewish extraction -  but this is DEFINITELY a predominantly jewish insider group talking amongst themselves.  First heard this last night - October 19, 2014 - on Texe Marrs' radio program, and went to the internet, and was able to find it, but was SHOCKED that the damned thing was 10 YEARS OLD, having been done on July 8, 2004.  Originally thought this was a typo, but apparently not.

It's definitely odd that this "dirty [+ or - a] dozen" bastards can take over a huge government, but who was watching?  These are the fuckers that old man Bush called the "crazies", and that Brent Skowcroft spoke out against when the little Bush fucker let him run his government, but why didn't old man Bush exert influence on the little moron?  Very odd.  Perhaps because the JEB fucker was part of the PNAC group from which the "dirty dozen" came, as was Cheney. 

Of course, the jews surely knew they were operating with at least tacit approval of higher-up jews, and its not like the tribal network isn't in place when they decide to move.   The kikes come out of the woodwork.  Extremely odd, however, that they took over the government without firing a shot - at least that we know of.  Decades of infiltration, of course, and no military heroes willing to use a weapon to defend the country from an internal threat.  Total acquiescence, it seems - wait until retirement and pension secure, and then write articles and give speeches.

Odd about old man Bush being so passive about the "crazies" during his presidency, and afterward, since there's pretty convincing evidence of his involvement in JFK's killing, and the Bush/Hinckley family friendship sure makes it look like the shooting of Reagan was for his benefit.

But, Yankee Doodle has often puzzled that, in the case of both Johnson and Bush, who might be suspected of shooting their predecessors to try to gain the presidency, they went out  democratically - almost without a whimper - Johnson famously declining to seek re-election and old man Bush giving way without bullets or ballet tampering to his buddy Billy Clinton.

So, we have two Vice Presidents from Texas - Johnson and Bush - whose Presidents take a bullet, and Yankee Doodle has often wondered what would have happened if Michael Dukakis had won, because his Vice President would have been the Texan, Lloyd Bentsen.   Hmm....

[rmstock]

goto 1:16:47

[rmstock]

How many times was the f..k word used in the 2004 ACLU video ?

According Greg Hallett's book "How to Take Over The World, A Right
Royal Con" the word FUCK actually is a acronym which stands for to
Fornicate Under Consent of the King. Don't tell the ACLU folks about
this however, as they will immediatly stop screwing around, as their
members are most probable no fans of Royalty.

[yankeedoodle]

Don't like censorship, but if it got that tedious bitch fired, it ain't all bad.  She might have a valid complaint, and it's too bad she lost her income, but who the hell would want to listen to her?  OUCH...my ears...and nerves.   

Heard another source of F-U-C-K, and it's somewhat related.  Heard that its origin is from medieval England, when the King ruled, and you could be arrested and the charge would be "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge." 

[rmstock]

Speaking of censorship, at 1:20:57 Seymour Hersh gets pulled from the
speaking stand by the ACLU themselves. No Q&A as promised, no nothing.
Hersh speaks about muzzling and self-censorship, but the ACLU in 2004
cut the end of his speech out and commits self-censorship to save its
own ass. From whom ?

[yankeedoodle]

Excellent observation.  Did notice that he ended abruptly, particularly for what seems to be simply a recording of a live event, and just thought it was extremely crude editing.

The ACLU gets a lot of money from donations, and perhaps Hersh said something that they thought would offend rich jewish donors, which would mean less money to fight against Christmas trees and laws against perverts getting married.