Donald Trump

[Ognir]

Since 1987



Here is your hero on Weiner that piece of shit

[Ognir]

completely insane

[Michael K.]

TRUMP V. HILLARY PREDICTED

[yankeedoodle]

Every election season that I remember good smart Americans go frigging nuts thinking that a "new" politician will save them - Hilarious

Hey, Og.  Yankee Doodle has a message for all you Europeans: 1) first of all, what you say is true, and 2) second, it AIN'T NO FUN living here being tortured for 18 months every 4 years.   

This election cycle - 2015/2016 - is a little different, though: it's like 1975/1976, when Smilin' "Trust Me" Jimmy Carter ran, and won.  This year, Blowhard "Tell It Like It Is" Donald Trump is going to win. 


And, speaking of torture, if listening to Trump talking to degenerate jew fag Savage/Weiner isn't enough punishment for you, here's a much longer conversation with another filthy jew degenerate, Howard Stern, if you want to see just how vulgar and trashy Trump really is.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=donald+trump+howard+stern+youtube&ia=videos&iai=MCO4MuhjNrg

[Idaho Kid]

We gettin' duh-mock-racy NOW!  Like the natural cycle of a pond.  Won't be long now.  But is da Donald really worse than FDR or W? 

[Michael K.]

Ordinary Americans have found a candidate they can really identify with...('if I win the lottery')



http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Scrooge+McDuck

1. Scrooge McDuck
verb
To dive headfirst into a pool of gold coins, literally swimming through your wealth, an activity popularized by its namesake. Because when you're as rich as he is, there's literally nothing better you can do with your money. Can apply to representations of wealth aside from gold coins, such as silver coins, dollar bills, etc.

2.  scrooge mcduck

It is when you are recieving oral sex from a female, and you take a pocket full of change(preferably gold dollas) and throw it in her face. Like a ballah.

[Michael K.]

"DUCK-mock-risy"

[yankeedoodle]

We gettin' duh-mock-racy NOW! 

is da Donald really worse than FDR or W? 

He's not named Trump for nothing, Idaho.   

LOOK OUT, WORLD!!

[Idaho Kid]

Is it short for Trumplestiltskin?  I should have added is he worse than those pieces of shit  Clinton, Ohandjob, HW, Truman, LBJ or Wood Wilson?

His ripping of PC norms is very good and it seems increases his appeal.

There was that shitty book about in the end we'd get some total fraud but that's been the norm for some time.

[yankeedoodle]

The Donald will trump all.  That's what he believes.  That's what he wants. 

His behavior is not that of the "ripping of PC norms", but, rather, the mere fact that this offensive degenerate fucker is spreading his special brand of joy to the political world, where, admittedly, his offenses are - for once - justifiable and enjoyable, as the recipients of his bile are deserving, except for the Mexicans, who are displaced victims of NAFTA, which Trump surely supported.

Here's a fucker who kicks old ladies out of houses - or tries to - to build a parking garage, publicly argues with and sues "beauty queens" because of weight issues, or some other idiotic contractual bullshit, and bullies Scottish people and destroys their environment so he can build a fucking golf course with his name on it.  These, of course, being surely just a few of the countless VERY PUBLIC spectacles he WITH GREAT JOY has graced us with.

Oh, but...let's not forget his fucking divorces, his fucking weddings, and his God-damned fucking hair...and, now, of course, an often seen baseball hat to cover-up that thing on his fucking fat head.

And, of course, he is on friendly - dare it be said "intimate" (yeccch) yet OH-SO-PUBLIC - terms with degenerate jew shit like Howard Stern.

Yankee Doodle remembers that, decades ago, he heard a news report of a Trump executive helicopter crash in New York, and, just to prove that sorrow never leaves, Yankee Doodle is as sad today as he was decades ago when he learned that the Donald was not amongst the dead in that helicopter crash decades ago.

An offensive spectacle on the world stage like never seen before awaits us.   

Yes, as a newcomer, he hasn't the criminal resume that compares to those of his soon-to-be predecessors, but this ego-maniacal piece of shit surely has in mind that he will out do them all. 

[yankeedoodle]

[yankeedoodle]

Don't worry, America.  The hair-brained shithead has a PLAN.  And, as we know, Americans will vote for ANYBODY who HAS A PLAN, so, all that can be said - again - is LOOK OUT WORLD.  Followed by, let's hope, we're sorry...that's right, we're sorry-assed fucking morons who democratically elected that piece of shit Trump, and please forgive us.

[rmstock]

Full Speech: Donald Trump Brings Down The House In Phoenix, AZ (7-11-15)
by The Savage Nation, Published on Jul 11, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls3m7NUOqxs
  "We'll take our country back": 15,000 PLUS gathered in Phoenix, AZ to
   hear GOP Presidential candidate Donald Trump speak today.

   Full Speech: Donald Trump Brings Down The House In Phoenix, AZ
   (7-11-15)"

https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/632951561631703040

[yankeedoodle]

This fucker's going to win.  Just like Jimmy Carter had Americans jabbering excitedly about this fresh new "anti-politician" and had the Democratic party politicians panicking, so, too, Donald Trump has Americans jabbering and the Republicans panicking.

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=19509.msg77280#msg77280

Yankee Doodle predicted doom on 8/9/15, and it looks like it is coming true.  Bill "the shill" Still is beating the drum, telling them that Trump will "Save us!" 

LOOK OUT, WORLD!!  And, please forgive them, for they know not what they do...when the stupid fucking propagandized dumbed-down morons vote for this zionist-stooge Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8kJikzRfco

[Michael K.]

I have it on good and venerable witness, that anyone this far ahead in the polls this early has never won the elections.  Same for Bernbaum.

[rmstock]

Something strange is happening. Certain elements in the Jewish society
and ones related thereto seem to have this strange underbelly feeling
of total fear for the Trump. It happened when Brother Nathanael Kapner
was invited back onto the Rense Radio network on Aug 4 2015 :

Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2015.08.04
http://grizzom.blogspot.nl/2015/08/jeff-rense-radio-show-20150804.html

Listen  Download  Hour 2 - Brother Nathanael - When Trump Makes A Deal
https://archive.org/download/Rense.20150804/Rense.20150804.2of3.mp3

The fear of Trump within certain parts of the Jewish and related
community is disturbing, where even Jeff Rense was totally put off
by Brother Nathanael. Today on zero-hedge the following posting :

Guest Post: Is Trump Worse Than Hitler?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/24/2015 18:40 -0400
Submitted by James H. Kunstler via Kunstler.com [Worse Than Hitler]
( http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/worse-than-hitler/ )
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-24/guest-post-trump-worse-hitler

  "[ ... ]
   World leaders considered Hitler a clown in the early going, too, you
   know. But the Germans were wild about him. He pushed a lot of the right
   buttons under the circumstances. Trump is worse than Hitler. And the
   American people, alas, are now surely a worse lot of ignorant, raging,
   tattooed slobs than the German people were in 1933. Be very afraid.
   [ ... ]"

"Trump is worse than Hitler." Thats probably because the Trump has his
own pile of cash and real estate ..

In recent past, observed tactics to denounce an opponent which the
Jew cannot `handle' as a New Hitler have been observed before. Even
Alex Jones put out in 2009 a DVD wich Obama depicted as some new Hitler.
Also larouchepac.com depicted Obama as some Hitler. But remember folks,
that happened after Obama put his feet on the Resolute desk in
the Oval Office. And now this. The GOP Primaries haven't even started ..

I wonder what The Fearing Jew will come up with next when the Trump
becomes official GOP Presidential Candidate for the US 2016 elections...

[Ognir]

Robert I merged your post to the sticky in News

[rmstock]

Robert I merged your post to the sticky in News

No problem, but folks should listen to that Rense audio from august 4
with Brother Nathanael. Nathanael repeatedly spoke in weird and strange
terms, which contradicted his own narrative. Nathanael : "Oh but be
warned, Trump is an American Exceptionalist". At least the Trump puts
America first, and does not own a Israeli passport.

[yankeedoodle]

Missouri woman cheesed off after seeing Donald Trump in her butter
http://www.rt.com/usa/313355-donald-trump-butter-woman/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

[Ognir]

Robert said

Nathanael repeatedly spoke in weird and strange
terms, which contradicted his own narrative

I thought Rense was nuts on that audio

[rmstock]

I thought Rense was nuts on that audio

Someone laughed as a maniac, but it wasn't Rense

[Ognir]

Don't count on either of them, Rense has soldout and I've recorded with 2 different kapners

[yankeedoodle]

Yankee Doodle believes that Brother Nathanael and Kunstler are sending us a WARNING.  And, he believes THEY ARE RIGHT.

Rense, for some fucking reason, is pushing Trump BIG TIME.   

When Brother Nathaneal criticizes Trump for "American exceptionalism," he is warning people that Trump is a threat to the world.  He is sending a WARNING that Trump, if, or when - more likely WHEN, Yankee Doodle believes - he gets power, he will, as an American exceptionalist, use his power to do any fucking thing he wants - as long as he makes the jews happy, of course.  That means war with Iran, war with Russia, war war war with anybody and everybody.  Every American knows that Trump loves to fight - he sues ALL THE TIME.  When he gets power, he will use the military, not lawyers.   

James Howard Kunstler is probably the son of William Kunstler, who was a radical criminal defense lawyer.  Kunstler was jewish, but he was an American, albeit with a radical jewish bent.  Kunstler was not - repeat, NOT - a war-loving zionist jew. 

The trouble is that it's not inconceivable Trump could get elected. Farfetched, perhaps, but not out of the question. 

http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/worse-than-hitler/

Here's a brilliant quote by Matt Taibbi in his article about Trump in Rolling Stone.

Those of us who think polls and primaries and debates are any match for that are pretty naive. America has been trending stupid for a long time. Now the stupid wants out of its cage, and Trump is urging it on. There are a lot of ways this can go wrong, no matter who wins in 2016. 

http://www.sott.net/article/300566-Donald-Trump-just-stopped-being-funny

WARNING:  Gerald Celente, on Rense, on 8/13/15, says Trump will be a TYRANT.  Begin listening at about minute 33.
https://ia801502.us.archive.org/12/items/Rense.20150813/Rense.20150813.2of3.mp3

In the Monday, August 24, 2015, issue of the Anti-New York Times, Mike King WARNS US in his analysis of the Jew York Times.
http://www.tomatobubble.com/id872.html

NY Times: Why Donald Trump Won't Fold: Polls and People Speak

By MICHAEL BARBARO, NATE COHN and JEREMY W. PETERS

Evidence suggests that the brash billionaire builder's dominance in presidential primary polling is no mere "summer fling."
....
This article is absolutely correct in saying that Donald Trump "won't fold". Poll after poll after poll all confirm that not only is Trump way ahead of the other 147 or so pygmies seeking the GOP nomination for the 2016 QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show); but that he now leads in the "2nd choice" category as well. But what the article misses, of course, is the real reason why Trump is running so strong and getting stronger; namely, he is A-1, 100%, kosher Zionist certified.
...
A Trump Presidency would surely embolden Bibi Satanyahu and greatly increase the probability of an Israeli strike against Iran (with U.S. "bunker buster monster bombs) - followed by Iranian retaliation and U.S. entanglement on behalf of its "ally". The hypocrite Trump proudly boasts of his past opposition to George Bush's "disastrous" Iraq War (after the war had already begun to go badly!), but seems to forget that his buddy Bibi (Foreign Minister of Israel at the time) was one of the war's chief cheerleaders! When asked what a Trump administration might look like, the combed-over circus clown name-dropped John Bolton - one of the most vile warmongers in American history.
...
As a top State Department official just prior to the 2003 Iraq invasion, Bolton pushed the LIE that Iraq had obtained aluminum tubes and uranium for its non-existent nuclear weapons program.
Before Bush launched the Iraq War, Bolton predicted that "the American role actually will be fairly minimal."
In 2009, Bolton stated that the only way to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons would be an Israeli nuclear strike.

A trip down memory lane. Bolton was hip-deep in this treason and now wants to do it all over again!

In 2012, Bolton backed then-Rep. Michele Bachmann's call for an investigation of members of Congress supposedly connected to a Muslim Brotherhood plot to infiltrate the US government.
This past March, Bolton again called for the United States and/or Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
This past May, Bolton said, "I still think the decision to overthrow Saddam was correct."

This then was the very first name to pop into Donald Dump's mind when asked who his "go to" men would be on foreign policy.

John Bolton - AIPAC lover

[rmstock]

from the wikipage of American exceptionalism :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism

  "American exceptionalism is the theory that the United States is
   inherently different from other nations.[2] In this view, American
   exceptionalism stems from its emergence from the American Revolution,
   thereby becoming what political scientist Seymour Martin Lipset called
   "the first new nation"[3] and developing a uniquely American ideology,
   "Americanism", based on liberty, egalitarianism, individualism,
   republicanism, democracy and laissez-faire. This ideology itself is
   often referred to as "American exceptionalism."[4]
   [ ... ]
   Etymology
   Although the concept of American exceptionalism dates to the founding
   ideas,[14] the term was first used in the 1920s. The phrase "American
   exceptionalism" originates from the American Communist Party. The term
   comes from an English translation of a condemnation made in 1929 by
   Soviet leader Joseph Stalin criticizing Communist supporters of Jay
   Lovestone for the heretical belief that America was independent of the
   Marxist laws of history "thanks to its natural resources, industrial
   capacity, and absence of rigid class distinctions".[9][15] "
   Early examples of the term's usage include a declaration made at the
   1930 American Communist convention proclaiming that "the storm of the
   economic crisis in the United States blew down the house of cards of
   American exceptionalism".[16]

   [2] American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. Seymour Martin
       Lipset. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc. 1996. Page 18.
   [3] Seymour Martin Lipset, The first new nation (1963).
   [4] Lipset, American Exceptionalism, pp. 1, 17–19, 165–174, 197
   [ ... ]
   [14] Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution p 92
   [9] Albert Fried, Communism in America: A History in Documents (1997), p.7.
   [15] The New American Exceptionalism, Donald E. Pease U of Minnesota
        Press, 2009 ISBN 0-8166-2783-5, ISBN 978-0-8166-2783-7 Length 246
        pages p.10
   [16] How Joseph Stalin Invented American Exceptionalism, The Atlantic.
   http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/how-joseph-stalin-invented-american-exceptionalism/254534/

In addition it was David Duke, (or was it Rabbi Finkelstein ?), who
said without hesitation, that all of Communism is Jewish. So American
Exceptionalism is actually a Communist smear word invented by the
Bolsjewists Leaders themselves. How about that Brother Nathanael ? One
thing is certain, The Jewish Fear of the Trump is very real. My vote is
for Trump.

[yankeedoodle]

Since the concept of "American exceptionalism" predates the supposed coinage of that phrase by the commies, the utilization of that phrase is not, necessarily, a commie statement.  The phrase, which describes a concept that predates the coining of the phrase, when used to describe that concept, does not make it a commie statement. 

Commie East Germany was, officially, called the German Democratic Republic.  Does the official adoption of the word "democratic" by the GDR mean that all utilization of the word "democratic" in descriptions of political thought and activity that predates 1945 mean that they were commies?  The first democratic government was reputedly Iceland, or some might say Switzerland, and they were many centuries ago.  Were Icelanders and the Swiss commies all these years, because the commie East Germans called themselves the German Democratic Republic?

Yankee Doodle doesn't normally vote, but, if the opportunity arises, he promises to vote against the Donald, lest he get carried away with himself and try to "exceptionalize" the world, and try to do a better job than little Georgie Bush.  Georgie Bush, remember, was spreading "democracy."  Trump will trump that, and will spread "exceptionalism."  Clever marketing, don't you think? After all, everybody wants to be considered exceptional, don't they, even if they are exceptionally modest? 

Exceptional is much more politically correct - damn it, the Donald hates the phrase "politically correct," doesn't he? - than saying they all want to be American, or democratic, so, when The Donald tries to take over the world, he will be spreading exceptionalism.  BRING IT ON, crowds around the world will roar.

Of course, everybody knows that American exceptionalists believe that everybody in the world wants to be an American, but nationalism creates a resistance to changing nationality - say, from Dutch to American - but, "exceptionalism," alone, sounds good to everybody, doesn't it? 

Trump says he's a "builder", and he knows how to build a wall, and he's going to build a wall to keep the Mexicans out, and, maybe,  they just might call it the "Trump Wall."

Now, who's to say the Dutch don't need a wall - another wall - to keep out the North Sea, and, perhaps, Trump might "exceptionalize" his fucking ass right over to the Netherlands, and bless you with a Trump Wall, which will protect Trumperdam.     Clever guy that he is, Trump will say that he stopped the "Rott."

And, as regards building, being exceptional, American's didn't have to do any fucking building - ah, rather, RE-building - after those wars that destroyed Europe - WW I and WW II - so, when he gets his hands on the US military, and get the chance to level Europe again, and do some building - that what he does, remember, build? - well, he just might decide to rename Europe as Trumpland.

Yankee Doodle promises to vote against Europe ever being destroyed and rebuilt and renamed Trumpland by Trump the builder.     

[yankeedoodle]

But, Robert, perhaps your support for Trump is understandable, but still don't want The Netherlands, or Europe, to be turned into Trumpland.

Don't know much - nothing, really - about Trump's history, but, of course, the name has always been a curiosity. 

Trump is inextricably linked to New York, and, as you know,  New York was once New Netherlands (correction:  New Amsterdam.  Wow, memory ain't what it used to be.)  Some time back, learned of a Dutch Admiral Tromp, and have always suspected that Trump might, somehow, be of Dutch descent, and perhaps descended from the Admiral's family, having Americanized the name to Trump, of course.

Lots of info on the internet about famous Tromp's in years past.  https://duckduckgo.com/?q=admiral+trompe+new+netherlands

Fully appreciate that you would love to have a Dutch name as President of the US - the Irish loved Kennedy, of course - but methinks he is now a fully-exceptionalized American, and don't think he would hesitate to fill in those canals and level those quaint narrow houses and build some big skyscrapers that he would call Trump -this, Trump-that, Trump-etc.

Might be a "homecoming" the Dutch might regret. 

[rmstock]

Fear of the Trump series

Plum Line | opinion
Dear Republicans: You could have avoided this whole Donald Trump disaster
By Greg Sargent   August 25 at 2:16 PM @theplumlinegs 1064  Comments
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/25/dear-republicans-you-could-have-avoided-this-whole-donald-trump-disaster-very-easily/

  "The consensus among many of our wisest political observers is that
   Trump-ism is a real phenomenon, that it's here to stay for the near
   future, and that it may pose a real long-term risk to the GOP. In a
   piece entitled, "Can the Republican Party survive Donald Trump?" Molly
   Ball reports that GOP donors and strategists are fretting that Trump
   has exposed the GOP's "fault lines" on immigration in ways that could
   do the party untold damage in 2016.
   
   And Time magazine reports that GOP pollster Frank Luntz held a focus
   group designed to plumb the sources of Trump's appeal, and left
   stunned. "You guys understand how significant this is?" Luntz said
   afterwards. "This is real. I'm having trouble processing it. Like, my
   legs are shaking."
   
   So here's a friendly reminder: this whole Trump mess probably could
   have been avoided. If Republicans had simply held votes on immigration
   reform in 2013 or in early 2014, it probably would have passed. That
   likely would have made it harder for Trump-ism to take hold to the
   degree it has so far.
   
   Before you ridicule me for suggesting that Republicans would be better
   off today if they had simply done what I wanted them to do — pass
   immigration reform — please recall that GOP leaders themselves said at
   the time that they wanted to pass immigration reform. Even reform that
   included a path to legalization for the 11 million.
   
   In July of 2013, House Speaker John Boehner strongly suggested that he
   would hold a vote on some kind of bill that included legalization, in
   order to "find out" whether it could pass the House. In January of
   2014, House GOP leaders rolled out a set of broad principles that
   included a path to legal status. These were real steps forward for a
   party whose nominee had embraced self-deportation less than two years
   earlier. In the spring of 2014, Boehner even mocked fellow Republicans
   for their reluctance to embrace reform, mimicking them as follows:
  "Ohhhh. Don't make me do this. Ohhhh. This is too hard."  Watch that
   again today:
   
   

   
   But conservatives revolted, Boehner shelved plans to pursue reform, and
   Republican leaders and aides quietly assured reporters that the party
   could always pass reform in 2015, to fix the Latino problem in time for
   2016.
   
   But some Republicans explicitly warned at the time that if the party
   failed to pass reform in 2014, it would only get harder to do so in
   2015, because the GOP primaries would start up. GOP pollster Whit Ayres
   warned:
   
     "If Republicans wait until 2015 to tackle this issue, that puts a
      very emotional and controversial issue right in the middle of the
      Republican presidential selection process. The opportunity for
      demagoguery will be exceedingly prevalent if we wait that long. It
      could drag the entire field to the right on immigration."
   
   Veteran GOP operative Rob Jesmer similarly warned that if Republicans
   didn't embrace reform, "presidential politics will consume our party,
   which will make it more difficult to get it passed. " Jesmer added: "We
   will severely diminish our chances of winning the presidential election
   in 2016 if this isn't solved." And as Jonathan Chait details, some
   conservative pundits, operating from the same rationale, also called
   for Republicans to pass "immigration reform as quickly as possible" and
   take the short term hit from the right, "allowing the base to vent its
   spleen and make up in time for the presidential campaign."
   
   In other words, some Republicans warned at the time that the party
   needed to embrace reform precisely to avoid the epic slow-motion
   disaster that might unfold if immigration got tied up in primary
   politics, creating fertile conditions for a talented demagogue to pull
   the party further to the right. Which is exactly what is happening now.
   
   To be fair, it's hard to know for certain if passing reform then would
   have led to less fertile soil for Trump-ism to take root later. It's a
   counter-factual, and Trump-ism appears to have many causes.
   
   But it's hardly an unreasonable suggestion. Imagine if House
   Republicans had simply held a vote on the Senate immigration bill,
   passing it with a lot of Dems, or had passed their own proposals and
   entered into conference negotiations that resulted in a bill that
   included legalization. The resulting measure would have meant enormous
   new investments in border security that would have carried — and this
   is a crucial point — bipartisan buy-in. As it is, border apprehensions
   have been at near record lows, and the flow of illegal immigration has
   leveled off, so the story Trump is telling is already ludicrous enough.
   But if Republicans and Democrats had cooperated to invest billions in
   further militarizing the border, it probably would have been harder
   still for Trump to tell his tale, and his immigration demagoguery might
   not have gripped his supporters' imagination in quite the manner we're
   seeing.
   
   Also, if legalization had passed, Trump would obviously have had a
   tougher time calling for mass deportations. And at any rate, if
   Republicans had passed immigration reform, the long term damage
   Trump-ism (and his rivals gravitating towards his positions) could do
   to the party among Latinos probably would have been mitigated.
   
   Obviously foes of legalization will argue that none of the above
   constitutes a substantive rationale for reform. But it bears repeating
   that many Republicans support legalization on substantive and even
   moral grounds. The party has long been split between those who can't
   accept legalization under any circumstances (or unless some undefined
   ideal of border security has been attained first), and those who are
   willing to enter with Democrats into some kind of compromise that
   exchanges more border investments for concurrent legalization, under
   strict conditions. The former group of Republicans got their way. The
   latter group of Republicans didn't. They declined to pursue that
   compromise. Even though they themselves knew that their punt could
   result in an outcome like the one Trump has bought us today.
   
   Greg Sargent writes The Plum Line blog, a reported opinion blog with a
   liberal slant -- what you might call "opinionated reporting" from the left.

[rmstock]

[yankeedoodle]

Interesting little video.  Shows what American's love about this bullshit artist.  He's a straight-shooter.  Tells it like it is.  Shows Americans just how phony the political process is.  He, of course, is not phony.   

MSM Gunning For Trump: 'Now He's Got an Ex-Grand Wizard On His Side'
http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/08/25/msm-gunning-for-trump-now-hes-got-an-ex-grand-wizard-on-his-side/?utm_source=21stCenturyWire.com+Subscriber&utm_campaign=6a494efbaf-21st+Century+Wire+Daily&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1dfb7233cb-6a494efbaf-63037989

What happens to Tony Montana if Trump gets rid of gangs?
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/what-happens-to-tony-montana-if-trump-gets-rid-of-gangs/

[yankeedoodle]

In the second hour, we're joined by journalist and author Matthew Richer for an inside look at the incredible Donald Trump media juggernaut which has all but overrun the US 2016 Presidential election cycle 

Interview begins at about minute 61 on Patrick Henningsen's Sunday Wire show.

Very interesting discussion.  Says Trump went to military school, so LOOK OUT, WORLD, if he gets his hands on the US military.

http://www.spreaker.com/user/acrnetwork/acr-live-feed_205