The Perestroika Deception --Anatoliy Golitsyn

[Michael K.]

Some of my respected detractors claim that I have failed to furnish them with evidence proving that the Jews continue to hold sway in post-Soviet Russia.  For that reason I have reproduced one of the writings of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, who attempted to warn the West beforehand of the planned oppossum gambit of the communists.  I hope that you will take the time to read these words and heed the logic and reason they contain.-- MK

Download The Perestroika Deception free: https://archive.org/details/AnatoliyGolitsyn

There is no such thing as a former KGB man.
— Vladimir Putin, Russian Federation President, FSB Gala, December 2005; quoted in Newsweek, February 6, 2006


https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/tag/j-r-nyquist/

MADNESS AND SHEER STUPIDITY HAVE BECOME THE NEW NORMAL

It is quite amazing – and frightening – to see how, these days, intellectual discernment & sincerity have come down to virtually zero. Not that we could afford such laxness, opportunism, or plain incompetence in a time when the fate and destiny of the whole of humankind is at stake. We can't. Yet, as Moscow and Beijing are now gearing up their joint efforts towards a new world unified under communism, not only the Pravdaesque mainstream media in the West, but even supposedly staunch conservatives and alternative columnists appear to be firmly immune, still, against the hard realities right in front of their noses. The "spectre of communism" has never left the scene, the USSR was never dissolved but simply relabelled, and yet these "useful idiots" (Lenin's phrase) keep parrotting Soviet disinformation, some of them even praising the unchanged Evil Empire as the future centre of gravity of a renewed Christian civilisation. Can madness get any more absurd than that?

If one reads premier communist defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, one can see how skilled the Soviet apparat always has been and still is in planting in the Western mind false hopes and illusory expectations. As a consequence, the fictitious dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and of the Soviet Union itself was naïvely hailed by the West as the dawning of a new, democratic era throughout the world, worse: the West was convinced it had won the Cold War! In reality, however, this greatest deception operation in the history of mankind simply removed from the sleepy Western eyes the image of the enemy, and the image only, opening up formerly unthinkable new prospects for the communist bloc to modernise and solidify its economies and militaries. Tragically, whilst Russia and China were growing stronger and stronger, the West, disenabled to see reality for what it was, was missing out on the ever more imminent threat to its very existence.

http://spiritoftruth.org/coup.htm

Memorandum to the CIA: 26 AUGUST 1991

Anatoliy Golitsyn

THE AUTHOR'S ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CALCULATED SOVIET 'COUP' AND OF ITS CALCULATED 'FAILURE'

According to my assessment, the Soviet 'coup' and its 'failure' constituted a grandiose display of deception - a provocation. The 'ineptitude' of the participants in the 'coup' and the 'failure' of it were skillfully planned and executed. The main argument in support of this assessment is that the Soviet military, the KGB, the Party and leading media figures apparently had neither the skill to launch a successful coup nor the guts to crush resistance to it. This is news indeed! 

Facing a real crisis in Hungary in 1956, the same forces displayed exceptional skill, know-how and determination in crushing a genuine revolt. Knowledge of the Soviet mentality and of Moscow's record of ruthless action has convinced this analyst that the Soviet military, the Party and the leaders of the media all have the skill, the will and the courage to crush genuine resistance and opposition. They did not display them on this occasion because the abortive 'coup' was carried out in accordance with Party instructions; and it was the Party and the Komsomol themselves which organized the alleged resistance to it.

The real participants both in the 'coup' and in the 'failure' were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party officials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interests of the Party's strategy and under the guidance of its strategists. The calculated nature of the 'coup' and its timing show that it was staged by the Russian, President Yeltsin, to save the essence of the Union at the time of transition to a new form of federation.

The abortive 'coup' and the 'resistance' to it were carefully calculated displays intended primarily for the West. This explains why Western media contacts with Moscow were not curtailed. On the contrary, the big guns of the Soviet media like Vitaliy Korotich and representatives of the Arbatov Institute were on hand both in Moscow and in the United States to 'help' the Western media with their interpretation of developments in the USSR. The episode shows how well Soviet strategists like Arbatov and his experts on the American media have mastered the art of projecting such displays for consumption by the American media, and throughout the West.

The Soviet strategists sought to underline for the West the dramatic ineptitude of the 'coup' and the spectacular courage and resistance displayed by the new 'Russian democrats' and their leader Yeltsin in 'defending' the Soviet Parliament- their symbolic equivalent of 'The White House'. The main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratization is genuine, that it has the support of the people and that it is working. They want to convince the West that Western investment in the USSR will pay dividends.

They expect that the West will now respond with a new Marshall Plan which will bring Western technology flooding in to the Soviet Union, promoting joint ventures and stimulating a restructuring of the Soviet economy along the lines of the revival of the German and Japanese economies after the Second World War.

Internally, one objective is to influence the Soviet population towards acceptance of the new Party-controlled 'democracy' as a real power and to develop the strength and maturity of the new 'democratic' structure and the popularity of its leaders, especially Yeltsin. Another objective is to exploit this staged 'coup' in order to reorganize and 'reform' the Soviet bureaucracy, the military, the intelligence and counter-intelligence organizations and the diplomatic service, and to give them a new 'democratic' image.

The Soviet strategists realize that only with such a new image, implying a 'Break with the Past' and severance from Communism, can these organizations be converted into effective weapons for convergence with their counterparts in the United States. A further internal objective is to emphasize the change in the system by means of the spectacular, televised but calculated removal of old Communist symbols like the monuments to Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy, and the red banners.

These changes do not represent a genuine and sincere repudiation of Soviet design and intentions to secure an eventual world victory. Although very spectacular, the changes are cosmetic. They demonstrate only that Arbatov and others know how to manipulate the American and other Western media through the use of powerful symbols such as the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, the toppling of Lenin and Dzerzhinskiy statues and Yeltsin's staged 'defense' of the Soviet 'White House'.

If the Soviets were truly moving towards genuine democracy, and were intent on a true 'Break with the Past', these symbolic changes would be accompanied by the introduction and implementation of a de-communization program, the irrevocable (not cosmetic) prohibition of the Communist Party and Komsomol organizations at all levels throughout the USSR, and the removal of 'former' Party and Komsomol members from all the main seats of power including the KGB, the Soviet army and its political commissar administration, the Ministries, especially those for the Interior and Foreign Affairs, and the trade unions. 

Yeltsin has allegedly banned the Communist Party in Russia. But the question should be asked: Why did he forget to ban the Komsomol youth organization?' [Note: According to 'The New York Times' of 29 September 1991, the Komsomol voted to dissolve itself; its regulations were changed 'to allow subordinate youth leagues in the Soviet Republics to succeed it' - Author's emphasis].

To carry conviction, the necessary purge of former Communists would have to be carried out at all levels, as was the intention with the de-nazification program in Germany after the war. Without any such program, present changes, however impressive, will remain cosmetic.

There are at present no means of distinguishing reliably between a genuine democrat and a former Communist in Russia. However one important criterion for judging the sincerity of the abrupt and virtually simultaneous conversion of former Communist leaders into true democrats would be a frank official statement from them that the Soviet Party and Government adopted a long-range strategy in the years 1958 to 1960, that 'Perestroika' is the advanced phase of this strategy, and that it is to be abandoned forthwith in favor of normal, open, civilized relations. There has been no sign whatsoever of any such admission.

Further criteria for judging the sincerity of the abrupt conversion of 'former' Communist leaders into believers in true democracy would need to include:

An official admission that the 'dissident movement' and its leader, Sakharov, were serving the interests of that strategy under KGB control;

Public exposure of the main KGB agents among Soviet scientists, priests, writers and theater and movie personalities who have been playing an active role in the KGB-controlled political 'opposition' - especially those like the 'conservative' Kochetov and the 'liberal' Tvardovskiy who in the 1960s engaged in a Party- and KGB-controlled debate intended to convey the false impression that Soviet society was evolving towards democracy;

And finally: a categorical repudiation of any strategic intention on the part of the Soviets of working towards 'convergence' with the United States.

The self-evident absence of any of these criteria indicates that the symbolic changes mean no more than that the strategists had reached the conclusion that the old symbols had outlived their usefulness - at least, in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe - and had to be replaced by new, more attractive, popular symbols. Moreover these cosmetic changes are logical and were predicted earlier by this analyst. The Soviets realized that convergence with the United States cannot be achieved under the old compromised symbols like Lenin, Dzerzhinskiy and others associated in the Western mind with terror, repression, exile and bloodshed. Convergence requires the introduction of new, attractive, national and 'democratic' symbols conveying the impression that Soviet 'democracy' is approaching the Western model.

No doubt these cosmetic changes, the reorganization of the Soviet bureaucracy and the new, more enigmatic status of its leaders like Yeltsin will be seen by the West as a deepening of the process of Soviet 'reform', offering new opportunities for Western policy. But the West's main weakness remains unchanged: it cannot grasp the fact that it is facing an acceleration in the unfolding of Soviet convergence strategy which is intended to procure the subservience of the West to Moscow under an ultimate Communist World Government.

The Machiavellian boldness and imagination displayed by the Soviet strategists through their staged 'coup' and its preordained defeat are alarming. No doubt these maneuvers will be followed not only by faked suicides, but also by staged trials of the alleged leaders of the 'coup'. These leaders may well be sentenced to apparent prison terms. But in fact they will live in comfortable retirement in resort areas like the Crimea and the Caucasus. Russia is a big country and places can be found for them to hide.

The' coup' and its 'defeat' show that the Soviets will go to any lengths in pursuit of their convergence strategy. This reminds me of remarks by Vladimir Zhenikhov, the former KGB Rezident in Finland, and Aleksey Novikov, another KGB

officer, at the time the strategy was adopted in 1961. Both of them had recently returned from home leave in Moscow. When I asked for the latest news from headquarters, both replied using different words but to the same effect: 'This time the KGB are going to finish with capitalist America once and for all'. I believed them then, and I believe that what is happening now is a bad omen for Western democracy.

The other alarming aspect of the situation is Western euphoria and the uncritical acceptance of present Soviet developments at their face value. This shows how easily the West can be taken in by staged Soviet spectacles, and how justified the strategists are in believing that their 'era of provocations' will produce the intended results. Furthermore, Western euphoria and naiveté serve only to encourage the Soviet strategists to stage new spectacles more convinced than ever that their strategic designs are realistic. .

[yankeedoodle]

Some of my respected detractors claim that I have failed to furnish them with evidence proving that the Jews continue to hold sway in post-Soviet Russia.  For that reason I have reproduced one of the writings of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, who attempted to warn the West beforehand of the planned oppossum gambit of the communists.  I hope that you will take the time to read these words and heed the logic and reason they contain.-- MK

What, exactly, do you want?  You say you are Russian Orthodox, and yet you seem to want Russia to be destroyed. 

When Iraq was destroyed, there were ex-pat Iraqis drooling for it to happen, so they could go back and loot the place.  Some - many? - of these people were working or collaborating for or with the CIA, most likely.

You say this document proves the jews lurk in the background in Russia.  If you want us to identify the jews, do us a favor and go through this document - in which the word "jew" is not mentioned one time - and tell is which of the Russians named in the document are jewish.

I don't think you can think straight.  Here's a quote:

They expect that the West will now respond with a new Marshall Plan which will bring Western technology flooding in to the Soviet Union, promoting joint ventures and stimulating a restructuring of the Soviet economy along the lines of the revival of the German and Japanese economies after the Second World War.

What's your fucking problem?  This didn't happen, did it?  So, what are you bitching about? 

Maybe the CIA read this fucking document, and acted accordingly, so there was no Marshall Plan for Russia.  Instead, some people believe that the CIA sent Harvard-trained economic hitmen in who helped the fucking jews loot Russia, and Vlad came in and kicked the jews out, and is trying to alleviate the damage the jew oligarchs did to Russia, and that is why war is being planned against him. 

Fuck you and your war-promoting propaganda.  You're promoting war, so you must have a space reserved for you in the bunker.  Hmm....

Or, are you waiting for the "rapture?"

[yankeedoodle]

Alright, you stupid propaganda-pushing moron, read this.   That's right, I can read your stupid fucking mind and hear you say that this is just a another subterfuge by the jews lurking in the shadows behind Putin, so, in order to prevent the resurrection of the Soviet Union the US better start a war that will kill hundreds of millions of "anti-semites" and that will benefit only...that's right, the jews. 

You're either a God-damned fucking idiot, or you're a Mossad agent.

Justice for the Romanovs: Russia reopens case into murder of last Tsar's family
http://www.rt.com/news/316333-romanovs-murder-case-reopened/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

[Michael K.]

OK, so first of all Russia has already been destroyed.  It was called the Bolshevik Revolution, and it was led by the Jews.  Perhaps you should read more about that.

Second, maybe you can show me where I wrote that I want to see the NATO alliance initiate WW III.  I can't seem to recall even thinking that would be a good idea, so what you are doing is creating a strawman argument and arguing against that instead of the facts.  Maybe you mean that if anyone stands up to Vlad the Inveigler, he is by definition inviting a nuclear war.

Third, your emotional content seems rather unbalanced.  You are so brainwashed by these Jews that now you attack me ad hominem and as a Christian for presenting an argument contrary to their Big Lie.

Please also note that I don't have to go into a blog dicking frenzy to bury threads with which I disagree (even though I am allegedly a mind controlled CIA robot). I can organize my argument into one thread which Mike WB can then blog dick out of existence by systematically posting the top ten or twenty stories from ZeroHedge and Global Research.

Any investigation of the murder of the Tsar is a cosmetic reform.  In substance it is meaningless since communists remain in power.

"Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America. Here you can get popular like Daniel Ellsberg and filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being 'dissident', for criticising your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cock-croaches; nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality! This they don't understand, and it will be greatest shock for them, of course. The demoralisation process in the United States is basically complete already. For the last 25 years – actually, it's overfulfilled because demoralisation now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who was demoralised, is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it – until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When the military-boot crashes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That's the tragic of the situation of demoralisation."

Soviet defector of 1970, Yuri Bezmenov, 1984 (interview conducted by G. Edward Griffin

But there is more to come...

[Michael K.]

If you are wondering where the Jews are that control Russia, you only have to look at the oligarchs from Russia who rose to obvious power after 1991using loans from the Russian central bank to buy up huge shares of the country's real wealth, and who remain (with a few notable exceptions) in power today.  Perhaps they were the hidden hand before that time, the real power brokers making the backroom decisions and calling the shots about how "democratization" would happen in the USSR.

http://davidduke.com/russian-oligarchs-mostly-zionist-supremacists-says-israeli-media-2/

"Russian" Oligarchs Mostly Zionist Supremacists, says Israeli Media
JULY 15, 2013 AT 5:29 AM

A large number of the infamous "Russian" oligarchs are in fact Zionists who hold—and conceal—their dual Israeli-Russian citizenship, a new article in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has revealed.

Titled "Just don't call them Gaydamak: Meet Israel's Russian oligarchs," the article confirms what knowledgeable observers have known for a long time: that Jewish Supremacists took advantage of the chaos in the collapsing Soviet Union to emerge from their middle-ranking Communist Party membership to seize control of huge parts of that nation's economy.

According to the Haaretz article, "more than a handful of Russia's richest men have made their way to Israel in recent years, but most keep their ties to the Jewish State out of the limelight for fear of antagonizing the Russian authorities or hurting their business interests.

"In the past decade, wealthy businessmen from the former Soviet Union have flocked to Israel in private planes via the Moscow-Tel Aviv route.

"They live below the radar, zealously guarding their privacy and hiding their assets and Israeli citizenship.

"Many of them fear that if their Israeli assets and citizenships were revealed, it would complicate their relations with Russian authorities or hurt their business interests.

"A good example is the case of Vitaly Malkin, one of the richest and most influential politicians in Russia.

"A former banker who Forbes estimated to be worth $1 billion, he was elected to the Russian Senate in 2004 and quickly accumulated power and influences in the halls of government.

"Among other things, Malkin was Gaydamak's partner in the company Avalon, which was involved in a scandal involving Angolan debt to Russia.

"Malkin appeared to be a man inevitably on the rise until March of this year, when he was forced to resign from government in shame following a shocking revelation: He was an Israeli citizen.

"A mysterious oligarch who doesn't hide his connection to Israel is Valery Kogan.

"In 2008, Kogan made headlines here when he bought five plots of land covering 11 dunams (nearly 3 acres) in the luxury community of Caesarea for NIS 64 million.

"Kogan is close to Putin, and Forbes estimated his fortune to be $1.8 billion.

"Together with his business partner Dmitry Kamenshchik, Kogan owns Moscow's Domodedovo International Airport, the largest airport in Russia, serving 28 million passengers per year.

"He also owns an $18-million mansion in Connecticut and in 2009, bought an apartment in the Sea One residential tower project along the Tel Aviv promenade for NIS 110 million.

"Kogan lives in Russia most of the year, visiting Israel every now and then.

"Kogan's neighbor in the Sea One project is Alexander Mashkevitch, a Russian oligarch who resides in Israel part of the year.

"He was ranked number 287 on Forbes' 2010 list of the richest people in the world. At the time, the magazine estimated his wealth to be $3.3 billion.

"Mashkevitch was born in Kyrgyzstan in 1954 and made his money in the mining industry. He has held Israeli citizenship since 1991.

"Today, he owns mines in Kazakhstan, Africa and Eastern Europe. His other business holdings include an insurance company in Kazakhstan.

"Together with his business partners and the Kazakh government, he controls 54 percent of the shares of the mining company Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation.

"In the past, Mashkevitch has been tied to money laundering investigations in Belgium, the United States and Switzerland. He denies the allegations and has never been indicted or convicted.

"Moshe (Viatcheslav) Kantor, 60, is the president of the European JewishCongress and the person behind the Russian fertilizer empire Acron Group.

"The Russian tycoon, who Forbes estimated to be the 39th richest person in Russia with $2.3 billion, has ties to Israel but doesn't significantly invest here.

"Very active in philanthropy and Jewish organizations, he splits his time between his homes and offices across Europe, particularly in Russia and Switzerland, and his mansion in Herzliya.

"Vladimir Gusinsky is a Russian oligarch who once held great influence in Israel but these days makes do with visits.

"In Russia, Gusinsky because a media baron in the early 1990s and was seen as one of the big businessmen closest to the government of then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin. He is now the owner of the Russian-language television network RTVi.

"Another billionaire who maintains ties with Israel is Ihor Kolomoyskyi, the third-richest person in Ukraine.

"Forbes estimated his wealth at $3 billion, while the Ukranian magazine Korrespondent put it closer to $6 billion.

"He is involved in philanthropic activity and contributes to various institutions, among them Yad Vashem.

"In Ukraine, Kolomoyskyi is one of the cofounders of PrivatBank and a major stockholder in Naftogaz, the largest gas and oil company in the country.

"He is also one of the key partners in Privat Group, one of the largest holding companies in Ukraine, through which he controls the Ukrainian national airline, Aerosvit, which declared bankruptcy in 2012."

[Michael K.]

[Michael K.]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/03/u-s-gives-russia-free-military-equipment-used-by-army-marines/

U.S. Gives Russia Free Military Equipment Used By Army, Marines

MARCH 26, 2014
Behind closed doors the U.S. government is giving Russia free military equipment—also used to train American troops—even after President Obama announced punitive sanctions against Moscow and, more importantly, a suspension in military engagement over the invasion and occupation of Ukraine.

The secret operation was exposed this week by members of Congress that discovered it in the process of reviewing the Fiscal Year 2014 budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 budget request. It turns out that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has been providing the Russian Federation with the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES), the federal legislators say. The U.S. military uses MILES for tactical force-on-force training because it has a system of lasers and dummy ammunition to simulate ground combat.

It's a crucial, military-grade technology that's similar to a "laser tag" available in some commercial markets, according to one of the outraged lawmakers (Oklahoma Republican Jim Bridenstine) that helped uncover the scandal. Bridenstine, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, has joined forces with Ohio Republican Mike Turner, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, to demand an end to the program. Along with about a dozen other House colleagues they penned a letter to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, who oversees the agency carrying out the "irresponsible military equipment transfers" to Russia.

The Obama administration's planned supply to the Russian Federation is a grave mistake given the recent invasion of Ukraine launched by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, the legislators point out. "It is difficult to imagine a worse time to provide military-grade technology employed by the U.S. Marine Corps, Army, and Special Operations Forces to Russia than when it has illegally invaded Ukraine and is violating the intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty," the letter to Moniz says. "To make matters worse, it is our understanding from the budget documents that the Department has been, and continues to propose, providing this technology to Russia free-of-charge."

This is preposterous and borders on criminal if you really think about it. As if we need reminding, Congressman Turner recants Putin's "brazen disregard for the sovereignty and stability of Eastern Europe" as well as his disregard for international law. "Despite this overwhelming evidence that Putin is not our ally, it is astonishing that the Obama Administration would still provide superior, U.S. military technology to an aggressive and advancing Russia," Turner said. "The United States must seriously redirect its approach and immediately terminate all military aid to Russia."

President Obama has already proven to be an international joke for his response to the worsening crisis in Ukraine. Even the mainstream media in this country has blasted the commander-in-chief's foreign policy as based on fantasy. One famously liberal magazine published a satirical article saying that the Obama administration froze Putin's Netflix account as a "major ramping up of sanctions." In a piece published a few days ago, a former veteran congressman wrote this: "The embarrassment of U.S. impotence in dealing with Russian aggression in the Ukraine is only the beginning of what will likely be a series of foreign policy disasters."

http://bridenstine.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=239

Press Releases

Bridenstine, Turner: United States is giving high level military technology to Russia

Washington, DC—Congressman Mike Turner, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, and House Armed Services Committee Member Jim Bridenstine along with sixteen House colleagues, sent a letter to Secretary of Energy Moniz regarding the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) FY15 proposal to provide the Russian Federation with the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES).

Employed by the U.S. military for training purposes, the MILES is a tactical force-on-force trainer, which uses a system of lasers and dummy ammunition to simulate ground combat for soldiers. While a military-grade technology, MILES could be compared to a "laser tag" system available in some commercial markets. Both Turner and Bridenstine are concerned that the Administration's planned supply to the Russian Federation is grave mistake given the recent invasion of Ukraine launched by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin.

The letter said, in part, "In the process of reviewing the Fiscal Year 2014 budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 budget request, it has come to our attention that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has been, and is planning to continue providing the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES) to the Russian Federation free of charge."

"It's ludicrous that U.S. taxpayers are paying to give Russia free military equipment after President Obama announced a suspension in military engagement with Moscow.  It's just another example of how the President is hanging on to his failed "reset with Russia" policy despite Russia's invasion and occupation of Ukraine.  I expect Secretary of Energy Moniz to act quickly and stop irresponsible military equipment transfers," said Bridenstine.

"Putin has proven that he has a brazen disregard for the sovereignty and stability of Eastern Europe and that he will continue manipulate and disregard international law. Despite this overwhelming evidence that Putin is not our ally, it is astonishing that the Obama Administration would still provide superior, U.S. military technology to an aggressive and advancing Russia. The United States must seriously redirect its approach and immediately terminate all military aid to Russia," said Turner.

- See more at: http://bridenstine.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=239#sthash.ieqXXN1o.dpuf

US foreign aid to Russia half billion dollars in 2012 alone.

http://us-foreign-aid.insidegov.com/q/145/1590/How-much-money-does-the-U-S-give-to-Russia

The U.S. Government gave a total of $440,858,706 to Russia in 2012:

The aid was broken down in the following manner:
Economic
Development Assistance: $346,500
Global Health and Child Survival: $4,824,462
Global HIV/AIDS Initiative: $5,901
Migration and Refugee Assistance: $7,774,288
Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related: $1,617,537
Other Active Grant Programs: $286,714,308
Other State Assistance: $4,786,646
Other USAID Assistance: $32,789,184
Other USDA Assistance: $149,880

Military
Military Assistance, Total: $101,850,000

http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/us-assistance-market-reforms-foreign-aid-failures-russia-former-soviet-bloc

U.S. Assistance for Market Reforms: Foreign Aid Failures in Russia and the Former Soviet Bloc

By Janine R. Wedel
March 22, 1999
Executive Summary

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, the governments of the United States and other Western countries have provided massive aid to promote a transition to the free market in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. But aid for market reforms in the region has been largely ineffective. Whether provided in the form of technical assistance, grants to political groups or nongovernmental organizations, loans and guarantees to the private sector, or direct financial aid to post-communist governments, that aid has been plagued by a number of problems. The failed $22.6 billion bailout of Russia by the International Monetary Fund in July 1998 only confirmed the flawed nature of the aid-for-reform approach.

Technical assistance, for example, has often been used to hire Western consultants whose advice is redundant or adds little to the development process. Aid has become an end in itself, and, in prominent instances, has resulted in conflicts of interests or self-enrichment of aid-financed advisers. Because providing official funds to countries in transition is an inherently political process, reform efforts often backfire when they are perceived to follow an agenda set by Western governments. Those efforts have been further discredited by the West's strategy of supporting specific groups or individuals in Russia whose actions depart from their purported interest in liberal "reform." The United States and other donor countries should not continue their dubious aid-for-reform approach if they wish to encourage the development of democracy and true market reform.

Full Analysis:
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa338.pdf

[Michael K.]

http://www.ncoic.com/coldwar.htm

The Cold War with Russia is not over.

By:  SGT. Robert L. Scott

N. C. O. I. C.

CIVIL INTELLIGENCE ASSOCIATION

DEFENSE OVERSIGHT GROUP

http://www.ncoic.com

The Cold War with Russia not over? Of course it's over, all of the news reports, political speeches, and campaign rhetoric since 1991 have been telling us repeatedly that the Cold War is over. The Soviet Union is gone, dead, defunct. The former Soviet Republics are now independent states and Mother Russia is a thrashing carcass, bankrupt, begging the West for monetary support. Trade with Russia and the former members of the Soviet empire is making money for Western investors hand over fist. We are enjoying the peace dividends of the end of the Cold War, closing military bases, and reducing American military forces to the smallest they have been in terms of effective manpower and capabilities since before the beginning of World War Two.

The premise of this paper must be sheer war mongering hyperbole, the paper it is written on good only for the lining of the bottom of a bird's cage, right? Until I heard a guest on a radio talk show, a Mr. Jeffrey R. Nyquist, I too would have made these same assumptions about anyone flatly stating that the Cold War was not over, but Nyquist's calm and certain delivery of his evidence and his previous employment as a Russian analyst for the Defense Intelligence Agency lent such a degree of credibility to his assertions that I felt compelled to locate his article Yeltsin's Russia Prepares for War and examine it for myself.

After perusing his article, I began using many of the keywords and sources that he provided in the article, most notably Yamantau Mountain, and found myself dumbfounded by the sheer volume of information regarding Russia's preparations to not only fight, but to also survive a nuclear confrontation with America and her NATO allies.

In this paper I shall prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the Russian government continues to acquire such technologies, construct such facilities, modernize its strategic arsenals, and stockpile sufficient logistical materials as to enable its goverment, military leadership, and an adequate number of its most critical civilian population to be able to not only prosecute but to survive an all out nuclear exchange with America and her NATO allies. The Cold War with Russia is not over.

Since prior to hearing Mr. Nyquist's radio interview I naively assumed that the Cold War was over and because I rely heavily upon the investigations that Mr. Nyquist has conducted, I consider it only proper that I present the biographical data that I have gathered about Mr. Nyquist himself so that those reading this paper will perhaps agree that he is sufficiently qualified to be a reliable source: J.R. Nyquist received his B.A. from the University of California at Irvine where he also attended graduate school, working in the Politics and Society Group. Since leaving the program Mr. Nyquist has continued research in Soviet strategy, Cold War history, and social theory. Mr. Nyquist was contracted with the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency from 1988 until 1992 in the Soviet / Russian analysis group. Nyquist has published articles in Conservative Review, and The New American, and is editor of The Final Phase newsletter (5). Mr. Nyquist was considered a reliable source by the Defense Intelligence Agency and I agree.

Prior to engaging in a conflict with thermonuclear weapons the leadership of any country will of course take measures to ensure continuity of government regardless of whether there is any significant surviving population to be governed. Russia has a long history of considering its own people to be expendable as is most recently illustrated by Stalin's deliberate starvation and whole sale slaughter of millions of the Russian peasantry during the 1920's. The most certain way of ensuring the survival of a core leadership is a nuclear proof foxhole (Hackett 62, 67, 129).

Yamantau mountain is a gigantic underground base in the Urals whose construction was started during the Brezhnev period. Russia's 1997 federal budget lists the project as a closed territory containing installations of the Ministry of Defense. On April 16, 1996, the New York Times reported on a mysterious military base being constructed in Russia: In a secret project reminiscent of the chilliest days of the Cold War, Russia is building a mammoth underground military complex in the Ural Mountains, Western officials and Russian witnesses say. Hidden inside Yamantau mountain in the Belorestsk area of the southern Urals, the project involved the creation of a huge complex, served by a railroad, a highway, and thousands of workers. The complex, being built inside Yamantau mountain by tens of thousands of workers, covers an area the size of Metropolitan Washington D.C. (Yamantau 1).

The revelation that Russia's Ministry of Defense is spending billions of dollars to construct a nuclear bomb proof facility deep under some of the toughest geological formations of rock in the world, composed primarily of granite and basalt, is disturbing in and of itself but what is more disturbing is that the U.S. taxpayer is actually helping to pay for it through currency supports and loans to bolster the sagging Russian economy. The current Legislature and Presidential administration continuously refuses to withhold taxpayer dollars from being used by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for such bailouts even after House intelligence oversight hearings reported the following:

(1) The United States and Russia have been working in the post-Cold War era to establish a new strategic relationship based on cooperation and openness between the two nations.

(2) This effort to establish a new strategic relationship has resulted in the conclusion or agreement in principle on a number of far-reaching agreements, including START I, II, and III, a revision in the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, and a series of other agreements (such as the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and the Chemical Weapons Convention), designed to further reduce bilateral threats and limit the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

(3) These far-reaching agreements were based on the understanding between the United States and Russia that there would be a good faith effort on both sides to comply with the letter and spirit of the agreements, that both sides would end their Cold War competition, and that neither side would seek to gain unilateral strategic advantage over the other.

(4) Reports indicate that Russia has been pursuing construction of a massive underground facility of unknown purpose at Yamantau Mountain and the city of Mezhgorye (formerly the settlements of Beloretsk-15 and Beloretsk-16) that is designed to survive a nuclear war and appears to exceed reasonable defense requirements.

(5) The Yamantau Mountain project does not appear to be consistent with the lowering of strategic threats, openness, and cooperation that is the basis of the post-Cold War strategic partnership between the United States and Russia.

(6) Russia appears to have engaged in a campaign to deliberately conceal and mislead the United States about the purpose of the Yamantau Mountain project.

    (A) General and Bashkortostan, People's Deputy Leonid Akimovich Tsirkunov, commandant of Beloretsk-15 and Beloretsk-16, stated in 1991 and 1992 that the purpose of the construction there was to build a mining and ore-processing complex, but later claimed that it was an underground warehouse for food and clothing.

    (B) M.Z. Shakiorov, a former communist official in the region, alleged in 1992 that the Yamantau Mountain facility was to become a shelter for the Russian national leadership in case of nuclear war.

    (C) Sources of the Segodnya newspaper in 1996 claimed that the Yamantau Mountain project was associated with the so-called "Dead Hand" nuclear retaliatory command and control system for strategic missiles.

    (D) Then Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Rocket Forces General Igor Sergeyev denied that the facility was associated with nuclear forces.

    (E) R. Zhukov, a Deputy in the State Assembly, in 1996 claimed that the Yamantau Mountain facility belonged to atomic scientists' and posed a serious environmental hazard.

    (F) Russia's 1997 federal budget lists the project as a closed territory containing installations of the Ministry of Defense, while First Deputy Defense Minister Audrey Kokoshin recently stated that the Ministry of Defense has nothing to do with the project.

(7) Continued cooperation and progress on forging a new strategic relationship between the United States and Russia requires that both nations make transparent to one another major projects underway or plans under consideration that could alter the strategic balance sought in arms control agreements or otherwise be construed by the other side as an important new potential threat.

( The United States has allowed senior Russian military and government officials to have access to key strategic facilities of the United States by providing tours of the North American Air Defense (NORAD) command at Cheyenne Mountain and the United States Strategic Command (STRACOM) headquarters in Omaha, Nebraska, among other sites, and by providing extensive briefings on the operations of those facilities (HR1119; H3943). One must conclude, after these findings, that the Russian government is not only being dissembling about their activities at Yamantau Mountain, but are actively seeking a strategic advantage as regards survivability of command and control during a nuclear exchange. This is definitively a continuation of the Cold War contest since, from the writings of Russian military and geopolitical strategists, whoever can have the largest number of critical personnel survive a nuclear war wins that nuclear war. I base this last statement on the following quotations:


"There is profound error and harm in the disoriented claims of bourgeois ideologues that there will be no victor in a thermonuclear war."
-A.S. Milovidov, Russian Military Theorist


"The principle of the employment of nuclear weapons in combination with other means of destruction follows from the fact that it is impossible to destroy all varied objectives on the battlefield with nuclear weapons alone. It is believed that nuclear weapons, as the main means of destruction, will be employed only for the destruction of the most important objectives; all other targets are neutralized and destroyed by the artillery, aviation, and the fire of tanks and other weapons. "
Colonel A.A. Sidorenko, Soviet Strategist (Hackett 62-66).


"Furthermore, it is inescapable that the Russian military has been taking advantage of American invitations to tour and be instructed in American methods of nuclear command and control, while at the same time denying American military representatives access to anything other than their most out-of-date facilities. This is intelligence gathering for the purposes of gaining a strategic advantage; for if you know how something works it makes it far easier for you to compromise and destroy it. To add insult to injury, it isn't just the mysterious Yamantau Mountain nuclear command and control facility that has forced me to conclude that the Cold War is not over, it is the further evidence that Russia is spending billions of dollars to modernize and upgrade its nuclear submarine force which, with over eighty submarines currently active, is the largest nuclear submarine force in the world, definitely outnumbering America's fleet of twenty four ballistic missile submarines."
(Intelligence Related Excerpts 21-23).

The West continues bolstering the Russian economy with currency supports in billions of dollars while simultaneously denying its own militaries the minimum budgetary allotments required to maintain credible defense capabilities and yet meanwhile:
Though Russia has been in economic turmoil, Moscow has been spending billions on vast underground nuclear war bunkers, new biological and chemical weapons, as well as road and rail-mobile ICBMs. Yeltsin's military continues to deploy 10,000 to 12,000 ABMs (Anti-Ballistic Missiles) and 18 battle management radar's, even though such deployment violates the 1972 ABM Treaty. At the same time, the Russian Navy continues to improve its surface and submarine forces, deploying the largest ballistic missile cruiser of its kind , named " Peter the Great". (Nyquist 3).

Where is the supposedly bankrupt Russia getting money for this military buildup? Could it be that Nikita Kruschev was correct when, as I understand it, he stated in his May 5, 1962 speech before the Soviet Union's Party Congress that the World Soviet could "bury the Capitalists of the West" and that there would be no need for Soviet forces to engage America and her NATO allies in an all-out nuclear conflict because capitalistic greed and avarice would provide all of the advantage that the Soviet forces would require? Is all this trade going on between Western investors and Russian entrepreneurs, as well as the billions in nuclear disarmament dollars carelessly donated by the American government, actually sowing the seeds for the future destruction of America and her NATO allies? It is hard to fathom that we, in the West, could be so foolish. But Mr. Nyquist asks the obvious question and gathers some chilling answers from former members of the Russian military machine:
Why is a supposedly bankrupt country spending its precious capital on war preparations?

A recent defector from the main intelligence directorate of the Russian General Staff, Colonel Stanislav Lunev, says that "Russians are terrified of the power of America". Lunev points to recent Russian military exercises as evidence of this paranoia. Earlier this year, the Russian Air Force practiced nuclear bombing runs over the Polar ice cap. These bombers would take such a route if they attacked the United States in a nuclear war. What is the thinking behind these exercises? According to Colonel Lunev, Russia's military is doing everything it can "to prepare for a war that it considers inevitable" (1).

To prepare for a nuclear war that the Russian military considers inevitable. Think about that statement. From a former member of the Russian military intelligence services (GRU), it is chilling, to say the least. Perhaps it is time for the American people to start demanding some truth out of their government, rather than continuing to blithely accept the "feel good" rhetoric they are being spoon fed so callously.

The Cold War is clearly not over, in the minds of the commanders of the Russian strategic rocket forces. I conclude that it is the height of folly for America to continue fantasizing that it is. Yet another indication that, as far as Russia is concerned, the Cold War is not over cannot be overlooked. The Russians are buying American and Canadian grain and, rather than feeding it to their clearly impoverished peasantry, they are stockpiling it.
According to Richard F. Staar, former U.S. Ambassador to the Mutual and Balanced Force Reduction Negotiations in Vienna, the "former" Soviet Union has stored at least 362 million metric tons of grain in nuclear blast and fallout shelters.
University of North Carolina economist Steven Rosefielde estimated that these supplies could feed the entire population of Russia and its CIS partners for three years (Nyquist 2).

Furthermore, the Russian military is providing civil defense shelters for a significant part of the population of Moscow, something that the United States has never completely accomplished, and which has now fallen into complete disrepair. When President Nixon canceled the SAFEGUARD ABM system in 1972 and established the principle of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) he deliberately placed the American populace totally at the mercy of the Strategic Rocket Forces of the Soviet Union. The Soviet leadership never bought into the ridiculous concept of MAD, and violated the ABM treaty at every opportunity presented, just as they are not buying into the SALT I, II and III treaties or the missile retargeting nonsense either:
In a move that defies Russia's bankrupt image, the Kremlin is upgrading Moscow's civil defense network of underground towns, tunnels and bunkers. This network includes a nuclear-proof city built beneath Moscow's Ramenki district, capable of housing 30,000 people (Nyquist 2).

Richard Nixon also disbanded all Civil Defense programs, including all funding to maintain essential supplies in the already constructed fallout shelters under many of the buildings throughout our larger urban centers. There is little or no food and water, let alone medical and radiological supplies, currently stockpiled in the basements of all those office buildings despite the fallout shelter signs still being posted. Perhaps this is to give a false sense of security to the average American citizen. For America the Cold War may be over, but not for Russia.

After digging my way through the Congressional records for many hours I finally came across confirmation of yet another of Mr. Nyquist's assertions, that super computers had been illegally sold to Russia. I found the following references while researching for another article on encryption technologies and they apply directly to Mr. Nyquist's article:
[Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania] "It is also a loophole, Mr. Speaker, in H.R. 695 that, in effect, would allow super computers to be sold overseas if, in fact, they have encryption built in. Now, this is kind of an ironic twist here, because many of the cosponsors of this bill voted for an amendment that criticized the administration for allowing Cray super computers to be sold to China and Russia. Yet, Mr. Speaker, in this very provision that some of them have unknowingly cosponsored, there is a loophole that would allow those same super computers, if encryption is contained in those super computers, to be sold overseas with no restrictions. I do not think that is the intent of most of our colleagues, and the amendment that I will be offering on Tuesday will correct that." (National 3).
It is interesting to note that the encryption policy was adopted, without Weldon's amendment.

Subsequent to this speech by Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, it was determined that the previous sales of three Cray YMP and two Cray XMP super computers to Russia had been carried out improperly, and that they should be returned to the manufacturer immediately. Russia not only has failed to comply with this request, but has moved them from where they were originally being installed at the University of Moscow, ostensibly for weather forecasting, and their whereabouts cannot now be ascertained. Perhaps they are even now operating deep inside of the nuclear command and control center under Yamantau Mountain? Could it be that Russia's  Dead Hand  system, their "Doomsday Machine", is now modernized and improved with American made super computers? I cannot determine with any certainty, but it is rumored that America's own "Doomsday Machine", called  Last Dance , is not equipped with even one super computer, but relies on an out-dated network of (early 1970's) VAX 11780 mainframes, which is about as far away from a Cray super computer as an abacus is from a 1990's desktop personal computer.

The Cold War with Russia is not over. A nuclear bomb proof facility the size of Metropolitan Washington D.C., ideally suited as a last redoubt for the Russian government to prosecute and survive a nuclear war from. Nuclear submarine forces being upgraded and modernized. Deployment of tens of thousands of Anti-Ballistic Missiles, and the Battle management radar's required to direct them, as well as super computers to command and control them being illegally acquired. Stockpiling of hundreds of metric tons of grain and other food stuffs, safely storing them in nuclear blast and fallout proof shelters. Expansion and improvement of nuclear blast and fallout shelters around Moscow, sufficient to house and protect 30,000 plus of the Russian leadership.

Congressional investigations find this all to be true and factual.
Defense intelligence analysts find all of the above to be true and factual.
Civilian news investigators uncover and report that all of the above are true and factual.

It is time for the American people, to demand that all further trade and monetary subsidies to the Russian government, as well as the other CIS member states, come to a screeching halt.

The current Presidential administration, and the Legislative branch as well, owe the American people a long overdue explanation of exactly why disarming ourselves, while arming our self-avowed enemies, is in keeping with their oaths to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution, and the People of the United States, from all enemies both foreign and domestic.

Works Cited

"Yeltsins's Russia Prepares for War". Jeffrey R. Nyquist. February 15, 1999
http://38.201.154.103/articles/?a=1999/2/15/34330
(17 February, 1999)


"The Third World War"Hackett, John, Sir, General, and McGeoch, Ian, Sir, Vice-Admiral., August 1985. 1st Edition. New York: Macmillan, 1978.
ISBN 0-02-547160-0.


"Yamantau- Russian and Soviet Nuclear Forces." Federation of American Scientists Database. February 03, 1999
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/facility/c3i/yamantau.htm
(18 February, 1999)


"Providing for consideration of H.R. 1119, National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 1998". (House of Representatives - June 19, 1997)
Lkd. Federation of American Scientists Database.
http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1997/h970619_a.htm
(16 February, 1999)


"National Security and Defense Issues" (House of Representatives - September 04, 1997)
Lkd. Federation of American Scientists Database.
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1997_cr/970904-cr.htm
(16 February, 1999)


"Intelligence-Related Excerpts". National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 Conference Report to accompany H.R. 1119. October 23, 1997 105th Congress 1st Session House of Representatives (Report 105-340).
http://lcweb.loc.gov
(17 February, 1999)

Return to Top of Document
Return to Home Page
NCOIC

Civil Intelligence Association
Defense Oversight Group

http://www.ncoic.com
Email: ncoic@ncoic.com

[Michael K.]

https://onceuponatimeinthewest1.wordpress.com/about/

About the Perestroika Deception

In 1984, former KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn published a remarkable book, New Lies for Old, alleging that in the near future the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, working in collaboration with sister parties worldwide, would feign its own demise for three main purposes: 1) deceiving Western governments as to communism's long-range goal of overthrowing the "bourgeois" states, 2) attracting Western capital to revitalize the Soviet Union's ailing command economy, and 3) removing any justification for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization anti-Soviet military posture. Five years later, the ruling communist party in Poland invited "non"-communists into the government and, in 1990, the ruling communist party in East Germany "capitulated" by uniting with West Germany. The demise of the Soviet Bloc had supposedly begun.

His predictions vindicated, in March 1989, Golitsyn submitted a memorandum to the US Central Intelligence Agency, further outlining the Soviet deception strategy in concert with the leaders of Red China. This and other memos were published in his second book, The Perestroika Deception (1995, 1998). An excerpt, with links to supporting documentation, follows:

PREDICTIONS ON THE EXECUTION OF THE STRATEGY'S FINAL PHASE

Expanded Role of the Communist Party

During "perestroika," the political role of the Communist Party in communist countries will increase, not decrease. The Party will continue to exercise overall supervision and control over the mixed economy through Party members among the managers and technocrats. The Party, operating "underground" and "working by other means," will provide political guidance to the Congress of Peoples' Deputies and other "reformed" and successor parliaments and to the new "political parties" and "grassroots democratic associations" through Party cells and individual Party members in the leaderships of these organizations. Guidance to Party members will be given through confidential briefings. Freed from day-to-day supervision over the economy, the Party will devote itself to guiding and implementing "perestroika" in the USSR and Eastern Europe and to implementing the strategy in the West. The Soviet Party apparatus will become a true general staff of world revolution to be carried out through the strategy of "perestroika."

Stronger, Maturer Ideology

Despite the apparent renunciation of ideological orthodoxy, Communist ideology will grow stronger and more mature. As "perestroika" proceeds, ideology in the Communist countries will be reasserted. Each success for "perestroika" will reinforce the belief of Party members and young Communists in the correctness of their ideology and their cause. Communists will continue to analyze international relations and the situation in the capitalist countries in terms of class analysis. Their "humanism" will continue to see love and hate in class terms. Capitalists, home-grown and foreign, will be hated, never loved; and they will invariably be deceived and take for a ride.

The Party will continue with ideological education and training to prevent contamination by foreign ideologies. Attempts to reform and replace capitalism in the West will be accelerated, not through ideological propaganda, but through the strategy of "perestroika," leading to "convergence."

An Improved, Reorganized KGB

One can expect that the KGB will be converted into a new organization with a Western-style name. The reorganization will be presented as a reduction of the role of the service in Soviet society. But, because the KGB's crucial role in promoting "perestroika" internally and abroad, the reorganization should not be seen as a downgrading. Just as Dzerzhinskiy's hated Cheka was converted into the more powerful GPU, so will the successor organization to the KGB be more powerful than its predecessor.

The new service will work with kid gloves and more sophisticated methods. Internally, its resources will be devoted to the creation of controlled political plurality ("democratism"). It will create a pseudo-social democratic party and Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian and Muslim national parties: it will even set up Stalinist and anti-Semitic groups, to give a convincing impression of plurality. Naturally, the service will be behind these groups and parties—controlling and managing them in the interests of the strategy and its objectives. The service will use its intelligence and security assets, particularly its agents of influence in the newly created national fronts, political groups and parties, to carry out the strategy of "restructuring" attitudes and polices in the West.

The New Model Soviet Regime

The Soviets will proceed with "perestroika" on the following lines:

1) A mixed socialist-market economy comparable to the Swedish economy will be established with one crucial difference. Soviet "capitalists" will in fact be secret Party members and Party political tools. Their influence will be used in the interests of the strategy abroad. This is what Soviet maturity means.

2) The Party will create controlled plurality a semblance of social democracy in the USSR. It will not be difficult to do. Even the Stalinist regime in Poland had nominally "non-Communist" "independent" parties. In fact, they were puppet parties.

3) As a mature body, the Soviet parliament will play an active role in the execution of the strategy abroad.

4) The new parliament will be closer to the Swedish model—again, with one difference. It will use its contacts with Western colleagues to influence them towards cooperation and "restructuring" in the West.

5) The Soviet Empire will not crumble as a result of nationalist unrest. The Party will create a stronger federation which will be in full control of foreign policy, defence and security but which will provide autonomy to the national Republics to run their own local affairs.

6) As the Party proceeds with successful "perestroika" in the USSR, both Russians and non-Russians will be increasingly inclined to accept it and take part in the process. In the final analysis, their attitude will depend on Western support for Soviet "perestroika" and the improvement in their way of life.

7) Successful Soviet "perestroika" will result in a Soviet regime of pseudo-social democracy with a human face.

8 ) At this juncture, the Party and the successor to the KGB will do their utmost to exploit the image of their new model, their prestige and the contacts and influence of the new parliament, the national fronts, the political groups and parties and the Soviet capitalists, to carry out the intended strategy of "restructuring" in the West.

"Restructuring" in Eastern Europe and China

A consistent effort will be made to expand and deepen "restructuring" in Eastern Europe and China. The new models will be like Soviet "perestroika" in essence but will reflect the specific national and historical features of each country.

For instance, in Poland the model will include Communist power-sharing with Solidarity and the Catholic hierarchy. In Czechoslovakia, the model will include the experience of 1968; in Hungary the rehabilitation of the revolt of 1956; in East Germany, the desire for reunion with West Germany; and in China, it will reflect the Asian character of socialism, the desire for reunion with Taiwan and the present close relations with the United States. Polish and East German "restructuring" should be particularly closely watched because of their relevance to the "restructuring" of Western Europe.

"Restructuring" in Western Europe

"Perestroika" in the USSR and Eastern Europe will be accompanied by a determined Soviet political and diplomatic offensive to introduce "restructuring" in Western Europe. Gorbachev and East European leaders will try to develop the present détente into close economic, military, political, cultural and scientific cooperation to create "one Europe" without NATO and the Warsaw Pact. A particular effort will be made to develop close relations and cooperation with East European social democrats and the Labour Party in Britain—exploiting the new Soviet pseudo-social democratic, mixed economy image. Attracted by this image and convinced of its authenticity, the social democrats may well respond to this courting.

East Germany will play a crucial role in the "restructuring" of Western Europe and of West Germany in particular. The appointment of Valentin Falin, a leading Soviet expert on Germany, as head of the Central Committee's Department of International Relations, indicates that the Soviets are preparing and counting on an East Germany initiative. Such an initiative will probably be supported by a Polish demarche such as revival of Rapacki plan for a nuclear-free zone in Central Europe. This time, one can expect the Soviets to remove the Berlin Wall. There is no doubt that their strategists realize that they will be unable to proceed with the strategy of "restructuring" in Europe without removal of the Berlin Wall—just as they were unable to proceed without a Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. Through removal of the Berlin Wall, the Soviets may be able to strike a new, Rapallo-style deal with the West Germans, particularly with a Social Democratic government, entailing their departure from NATO and acceptance of neutrality.

Given that Soviet "perestroika" incorporates by design many Euro-Communist positions (criticism of Soviet repressive practices, condemnation of the intervention in Czechoslovakia in 1968, broadening Soviet democracy), Euro-Communist parties will join and support the movement for "restructuring" in Europe which will give them new opportunities for revitalizing themselves. They will attempt to establish unity of action with social democrats to bring about "restructuring" in their own countries. Dubcek's re-emergence from obscurity and his recent visit to Italy at the invitation of the Italian Communist Party supports the notion that the Euro-Communists will seek to exploit Soviet and East European "perestroika" to regain political influence in their own countries. Support for Soviet and East European "perestroika" by the Italian and French governments renders the socialist parties of these countries vulnerable to approaches from the Communists.

"Restructuring" in the Third World

An active Soviet and East European offensive to carry out "restructuring" in the Third World can be expected. The present Soviet readiness to contemplate and even encourage the settlement of armed conflicts by their proxies does not mean the abandonment of their objective of Communist penetration of the region concerned. It represents no more than change of tactics. The strategy of "restructuring" broadens Soviet opportunities for gaining influence through the achievement of political solutions. The reformed regimes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe will engage with the West European social democratic parties and the Socialist International in introducing and carrying out "restructuring" in the Third World and particularly in Latin America. Exploiting the debt problem and the example of Soviet "perestroika," they will seek unity of action with labour, religious, student, human rights and ecological movements. The impact of Soviet "perestroika" on these countries may be expected to grow. The Mexican press is already drawing parallels between Soviet "perestroika" and political change in Mexico described as "Salinastroika." The former Mexican communist leader made the same comparison. Fuentes, the left-wing Mexican novelist, wrote recently that Salinas must become a Mexican Gorbachev if he wishes to change the state of affairs in Mexico. Another example is the recent offer of the Salvadorean guerrilla leaders to disarm themselves if the Salvadorean army is restructured.

These examples indicate the beginning of a trend towards "restructuring" in Latin America. The trend will accelerate if the United States begins to help it without taking into account the Soviet strategic design that lies behind it.

Given the fragility of democracy, the desperate economic situation and the debt problem, particularly in Latin America, one can expect an active, joint operation by the Soviets, the East Europeans and European social democrats (with their money) to bring to power Allende- or Sandinista-type regimes and "restructuring" in these countries along the lines of the new, reformed Soviet model.

"Restructuring" American Military-Political Alliances

The Soviets will exploit the image of the reformed and peaceful Soviet systems to shatter the Western consensus about the Soviet threat and the need for political and military alliances. In Europe, the Soviets will probably attempt to create a serious rift in NATO or break it up altogether by removing the Berlin Wall and reaching a Rapallo-style deal with West Germany involving West Germany withdrawing from NATO and following Austria into neutrality. In Asia, the Soviets may attempt to break up the US-Japan security pact by returning the Kurile Islands to Japan and offering Japan economic concessions to promote the development of Siberia.

As the Soviets carry out "restructuring" in the Third World, they will use their influence to reduce the American presence in the region.

"Restructuring" in the United States

The Soviets will do their utmost to persuade the new Administration (of US President George H. W. Bush) to follow Reagan's policy of embracing "perestroika" and rapprochement with the Soviet Union. They will intensify the efforts of Gorbachev and Sakharov to engage the American elite in cooperation over the environment, space, disarmament and the joint "solution" of social, political, economic, environmental, military and international problems.

Visits by Soviet scientists, politicians, intellectuals and cultural delegations will be stepped up in order to put across to the Americans the ideas of "restructuring" and convergence. Likewise, more American scientists, intellectuals, opinion-formers, politicians and religious groups will be invited to the USSR where they will be subjected to persuasion on the advantages of "restructuring" and convergence.

Soviet agents of influence in the United States will redouble their attempts to act as catalysts in promoting "restructuring" and convergence. They will initiate public debates on security aimed at shattering the American consensus on the Soviet threat and destabilizing and "restructuring" the US military-industrial complex. KGB agents among Soviet "dissidents" and cultural defectors will travel back and forth between the United States and the USSR acting as bridge-builders in cultural and political convergence. The whole political potential of the KGB-controlled political parties and so-called "grassroots organizations" will be used to establish links with their genuine counterparts in the United States and influence them toward "restructuring."

During their visits to the United States they will try to impress the Americans with the growing similarity of their system to the American system and to convince them of the soundness of convergence as a means of avoiding nuclear war.

As "restructuring" proceeds in Eastern Europe, the East Europeans will join the Soviet offensive to gain a foothold in the United States to secure their share of political influence over the American ethnic minorities.

(Anatoliy Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception: The World's Slide Towards the Second October Revolution: Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency, London: Edward Harle, 1995, 1998; pages 27-32)

CHINA: A STRATEGIC ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES

Communist China is not a strategic partner but a concealed strategic enemy of the United States. China will join in the Soviet offensive to bring about 'restructuring' in the United States and worldwide.

Through penetration, Chinese Communist intelligence destroyed the ClA's sources in China during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s and prevented the Agency developing reliable sources on the strategic intentions of the Chinese leaders. The National Security Agency cannot help because information on secret Sino-Soviet strategic coordination is not carried on accessible communications channels.

This situation leaves American policymakers poorly informed on the subject. American policymakers from the time of Nixon and Kissinger to the present day have become known for their excessive reliance on the verbal assurances of Mao, Chou En-Lai and Deng. Reliance on their word is no substitute for good intelligence.

Because of this intelligence gap, America's policymakers have not distinguished between China's tactics and her strategy. This failure is not new: it was evident as early as the Second World War when the Americans failed to realise that the Chinese Communists' cooperation with the Nationalists against the Japanese was a tactic adopted in order to achieve their strategic objective – their victory over the Nationalists. Some of the statements of the Chinese leaders to their own followers are unflattering about American policymakers and are, in fact, disturbing. In the late 1960s, Mao advised the Party not to take the Americans seriously in a strategic, but only in a tactical sense. Deng's well known statement about a cat catching a mouse, made when China was introducing capitalism and receiving American technology, can be interpreted as meaning that the Chinese Communist leader is the cat that caught the American mouse.

Because of their confusion, American policymakers believe that Communist China is an important strategic partner and a strategic rival and enemy of the Soviet Union. In this they are wrong. China is a tactical, not a strategic partner of the United States and a tactical, but not a strategic "enemy" of the Soviet Union.

The grounds for this conclusion are to be found by analysing the long-range Communist strategy which illuminates the strategic role of China.

Communist China was one of the principal architects of the Communists' long-range strategy. The Sino-Soviet 'split' was a common strategic disinformation operation to secure the successful preparation of their common strategy of 'restructuring'. The Soviet and Chinese leaders have continued their secret strategic coordination through a division of labour.

Gorbachev's 'perestroika' and Deng's 'Four Modernisations' (a Chinese euphemism for 'restructuring', or 'perestroika') are two similar elements in the final phase of the common strategy.

In the light of the new method of analysis, the purpose of Shevardnadze's hastily arranged trip to China on the eve of President Bush's visit was to give advice to Deng on his talks with the American President. Gorbachev and Deng will use their meeting to discuss coordination and new initiatives to be taken during the final phase of the strategy The new analysis sees the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan as a tactical move en route to the principal strategic objective – 'restructuring' e.g., engaging the United States in support of 'perestroika'.

China's close relations with the United States and even Chinese helpfulness to the United States over the Pakistan-Afghanistan situation are tactics intended to secure China's primary strategic objective of becoming a modem superpower with the help of American technology.

According to this analysis, the Chinese leaders are using their own Party apparatus and security services to try to repeat Soviet successes in creating controlling political opposition and introducing its members to the United States in order to shape American policy in the interests of a common Communist strategy.

In fact the Chinese have been so impressed by Sakharov's success in gaining influence in the United States that they are developing their own Sakharovs – agents of influence among leading Chinese 'dissident' scientists. Thus it can be predicted that the Chinese will establish their own foothold of influence in the United States and will eventually join the Soviet offensive to procure American 'restructuring'.

For China is destined to become a primary Soviet partner in the future World Government towards which Moscow and Peking are jointly proceeding.

(Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, pages 35-36)

[Michael K.]

http://deathofcommunism.weebly.com/jews-still-in-control-of-russia.html

Death of Communism

JEWS STILL IN CONTROL OF RUSSIA

When the Jews took over Russia with Communism, they killed the entire Gentile ruling and upper classes, and replaced them with a Jewish ruling elite which was part of a larger Jewish order.

"Rosenthal also talks about a Jewish invisible government which also controls the USSR, and how the UN is "nothing but a trap door to the Red World's immense concentration camp." He says this invisible power is responsible for the wars and revolutions of the last 200 years." — Harold Wallace Rosenthal, age 29, personal assistant to New York Senator Jacob Javits 1976 interview with Walter White Jr., editor, Conservative monthly, Western Front.

When the Soviet Jewion fell apart due to the long -term effects of the Second World War and the people openly rebelling in the streets, the Jewish elites in Russia simply put up new window dressing and did a game of musical chairs, in order to stop a full rebellion that would topple them. The new post-Soviet government was just as openly full of Jews as was the former one. It is the same ruling class.

This brings us to Vladimir Putin who was a Lieutenant Colonel in the KGB before the fall of the Soviet Union. He was then brought into the New Government. This is revealing the facts on the KGB, like the NKVD and Cheka before it. It is created, staffed, and run by Jews, as it is the important arm of the Jewish ruling classes' control:

http://heretical.com/miscellx/bolshies.html

According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964, the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess and his children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent Jews in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact, every secret police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the first, Uritsky, the murderous Beria... A Jew is also in charge of the Soviet economy – Leonid Kantorovich.

Keep this in mind when you realize that Putin within 16 years, rose to Lieutenant Colonel of the KGB, proceeded to be high -ranking in a Jewish owned and staffed government, and is now the front man for the ruling kosher cabal:

Putin admitted to growing up in the same apartment with a bunch of Jews. When speaking before a Jewish audience, Putin revealed that his own father was an "avid Talmudic scholar."

"Mr. Putin said he was familiar with both the menorah and the Chanukah holiday, because as a child his family shared their communal apartment with a Jewish family. "

Source: Chabad.org – Jewish News - Chanukah Journal Nov 26, 1999 http://www.chabad.org/news/article_cdo/aid/1119/jewish/Chanukah-Journal.htm

Putin: "I will do everything for the Jews!" Posted October 18, 2012. "Putin will save us" says Jew Kapner! By "us," he means Jews.

"RUSSIA'S PM TO JEWISH DELEGATION: I WAS FIRST TO RESTORE JEWISH PROPERTY!

MOSCOW — In an extraordinary 40 minute meeting with Russian Jewish leaders yesterday (November 25), Russian Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin promised to assist the Jewish community in combating anti-Semitism, building schools and reclaiming former synagogue buildings for Jewish communities."

"Rabbi Berel Lazar, chief Lubavitch emissary to the region, who was recently elected as the head rabbi by delegates to the newly formed Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, accompanied Federation officials Lev Leviev, Michael Gluz and Mark Grubarg to present the prime minister with a silver Menorah. Rabbi Lazar described the Menorah as a symbol of religious freedom. Speaking about the miracle of Chanukah, the rabbi and his colleagues described the resurgence of Jewish life in Russia since the fall of communism as a modern miracle."

Jew-lover Putin admits growing up in the same apartment with a bunch of Jews. While talking to a Jewish audience, Putin reveals that his own father was an avid Talmudic scholar..."Mr. Putin said he was familiar with both the menorah and the Chanukah holiday, because as a child his family shared their communal apartment with a Jewish family." Putin's father's real name was Epstein, his mother's Shalomova.

http://henrymakow.com/putin-is-nwo-pawn.html

Tamara: "The photo at bottom left shows Opposition to Putin saying Putin is 100% a Jew (his mother is a Jew and his father is a Jew). In Russia, many Jewish people hide their Jewish origin or they do not know or do not want to know. Putin is a person who hides his Jewish origin but uses it in the corruption nets. Historians tried to find his ancestors but failed. Common Russians think that Putin is an ethnic Russian. If they understood that Putin is a Jew, they would not vote for him. The picture bottom right shows Putin's resemblance to a Jew from Tsarist era."

"In Russia, the eternal question is: "Who Lives Well in Russia?" At different times, they were different people, but now everyone knows that life is only good for the super-rich oligarchs, mostly Jews."

Putin pledges to make Russia comfortable for the enemy Jew. Perhaps that will shed light on why he treats nationalists and proud Russian patriots like Jews treat animals.

"Focusing on the Federation, Mr. Putin described its founding as a positive development to bring diverse groups within the Jewish community together to work toward common goals. He expressed his hope that the new Federation would help foster a climate of communal strength that will make Russia a country where Jews will live comfortably."

The following was written by a Christian Russian Nationalist, but it provides a clear understanding of what is really happening in the Jewish owned and controlled current Russia:

"Their goal is to create in place of Russia and Russian civilization a new supranational pseudo- empire within the framework of the New World Order, under the guidance of a Jewish elite."

Russians in Russia: The State within the State April 24, 2012 --

Igor Artemov, Translated by Roman Frolov

No one in the Russian National political movement —or just anyone for whom his Russian identity is not simply a matter of fact but a defining aspect of his life, beliefs, and actions—should harbor any illusions regarding the corrupt, grotesquely hypocritical, bureaucratic and police-state nature of the modern state authority and ideology existing in the Russian Federation. All this is true and doubtlessly affects our lives. And yet the single most important thing to understand is that this system is explicitly and purposefully anti-Russian.

Although we cannot exclude that Putin and his close circle dream about their 'empire', there won't be any place in their 'empire' for the Russian spirit and Russian ideology, just as there was no place for Russianness in the late Soviet Union. Remember that the process of destroying the Russian nation and Russian worldview, unprecedented in its scale and consequences, was launched precisely in the Soviet Union and the current authorities of Russian Federation carry on this process more or less consistently. The Russian culture and the Church were being destroyed in the USSR. Internationalism and inter-racial marriages were promoted. The USSR has done everything possible to make people to identify themselves not as Russians, Tartars, or Tuvans but as Soviet people. All the facts show that it is the USSR and not the old Russia that serves as a role model for the current Russian authorities. They are building a post-Soviet state and not in any way a Russian national state. I consider this statement essential because of the conclusions and actions that follow from it directly.

If the Russian Federation was just a red-tape bureaucratic or corrupt state, then these defects of the political system could be fought against and to a certain extent eliminated simply by dealing with the mistakes. Yet the problem is that both corruption and despotism in our country are consciously enforced from the very top of state power. Long ago I realized that the situation in our country does not result from the stupidity, greed or incompetence of the ruling circles. Only an idiot would have trouble understanding that it is better for the country to have its own competitive manufacturing instead of exporting raw materials or to have honest officials instead of bribe- takers. The Russian authorities understand this too. And yet they do everything the other way around, strengthening and hardening from above all the vices of the state system. "Why?" you ask me. Well, because they have aims that are very different from those they publicly declare on television and through the mass media.

Their goal is to create in place of Russia and Russian civilization a new supranational pseudo- empire within the framework of the New World Order. Under the guidance of a Jewish elite, the Russian majority will be gradually replaced by Asian migrants. Of course, they cannot acknowledge this openly as it will cause mass protests and they will be quickly swept away. So for the people's consumption they have an official ideology of building a society of prosperity, social justice and interethnic peace. Yet they cannot hide the truth, especially from those who have access to objective information. As a result, the silence of the ruling circles is bought by enormous material benefits on one hand, and by intimidation on the other. In this light, it is easy to understand the murders of generals Lebed and Rokhlin, ophthalmologist Fyodorov, Governor Evdokimov and many others who had ascended to the political Olympus in Russia but had not become completely loyal to those forces that control and deliberately destroy our country as the heart of Russian civilization. I think that the mysterious death of General Shebarshin, the last chief of the KGB, is in the same line of political murders.

The main supports for the Russian authorities in this enterprise are the security agencies. Their purpose is to suppress any popular protest and discontent by unlawful use of force — simply because it is impossible to do it by lawful methods. It is not a coincidence that today the members of the security agencies and not regular officials or manufacturers who get the most of benefits and opportunities. Not long ago I had a conversation with an old acquaintance of mine who sells real estate on the Black sea coast and in the Caucasus Mineralnye Vody region [translator's note: popular resorts]. He claimed that 80%.

of the expensive property [$500,000 and up] in these areas is purchased today not by state officials or businessmen but by highly-placed officials of the Federal Security Service [FSS], Interior Ministry, Public Prosecutor Office, and other similar agencies from various regions of the country [sometimes such purchases are made using front persons]. In this way these 'people's servants' prepare for their retirement. Needless to say, such property acquisitions are far beyond the means of an honest official, even considering their large salaries.

Thus a conspiracy of silence emerges. Every member of this criminal system knows that he can keep his power and unlawfully acquired riches only if he remains silent and does everything his masters order him to do. If he doesn't, however, and takes the liberty of excessive high-handedness or independency, he will face huge problems.

I would like to describe two examples from my personal experience, which clearly show that highly stationed Russian officials have a perfect understanding of what is going on in our country and of the direction it is leading into. In the beginning of the last decade when I was a Deputy of the Legislative Assembly of Vladimir Oblast I had a conversation with one of the representatives of the President in that region. The conversation has stuck in my memory. There was high turnover at this position and I would like to avoid naming this person. The official sympathetically inquired about the Russian national movement and our ideology, and he demonstrated impressive knowledge of Bolshevism, Freemasonry and pretty good personal erudition. He told me that he reads our newspapers [the Internet was not as widespread then as it is now], and that some of his relatives voted for me in the elections to the Russian Parliament. I even felt some sympathy toward him because of his education and culture. In the end he talked about himself. He said that he understands the rightness of our cause albeit there were not only Russians among his ancestors. He told me that in Soviet times he and other members of the Communist Party were shown special movies on the danger of world Zionism and Freemasonry, and he mentioned some facts which I was not aware of. At some point, I even thought that he could provide a tacit support to our cause.

Yet it ended differently. My confidant finished our conversation with a parable. Let's say, he told me, a gang of robbers attacks a woman and wants to rape her. She has a choice, to resist, get seriously beaten and injured and be raped anyway, or "to relax and try to get some pleasure".... So this is what is being done with our country. We can't fight against the whole world. So let's relax and try to benefit from this situation as much as possible. I remember being quite shocked, both at his level of awareness and his conclusions.

As a second example, in 2003 I was one of the originators of the internal investigation of the Police Department of Vladimir Oblast by a special commission from Moscow. The commission was headed by an elderly Lieutenant-General Golubev, if I remember correctly. He expressed his wish to meet me personally. It was a long conversation. I told him all I knew about incidents of bribery, racketeering etc. He listened carefully and took notes. At the end, we had turned to the Russian question again. Looking away, he asked me: "If things in Russia continue in the future as they are today, for how much longer will the Russian people survive?" I answered that I look forward to positive changes and aspire for the establishment of Russian national rule, but if the regime perseveres, the Russians as a nation will likely hold on for thirty or forty years more, and after that all sorts of irreversible changes are possible. "I also think so" — he replied.

We had parted amiably. A couple of weeks later I received a letter signed by this same General, in which he thanked me for my assistance and informed me that, based on my information, around fifteen police officers were subjected to disciplinary action, but not a single 'brave' officer was punished seriously, though they deserved it. The commission had returned to Moscow and things in Vladimir resumed their 'natural' course. I guess that our General retired soon after these events.

Make no mistake: both of the high state officials described here represent the best part of the establishment. They at least say that they are not against us. Others, however, are much, much worse: they are stupid, avaricious and cynical. Yet even these two wouldn't openly side with us. They would stand aside and wait for something. This is why the Russian movement today should avoid internal dissent and squabble between parties. The regime hates us all, no matter who we are — backers of the empire or national democrats or Russian Orthodox nationalists or whoever else — it hates us just because we are Russian, because we don't hide it and because we fight as best we can for our rights and ideals.

We interfere with their desire to destroy Russia quickly and quietly. It is time now to begin building a "state within a state" in our midst, a society closed to outsiders where we can resolve all internal questions within it. We have no friends among the authorities, but we have many friends and like -minded people among businessmen, scientists and military men, among virtually all strata of Russian society. I will return to this topic in subsequent articles.

Igor Artemov is a well-known Russian Nationalist. His organization, Russian All - National Union [RONS] was proscribed last year and Artemov himself is on the run, as he is wanted by Federal Security Service for the 'hate crime' of writing

______________________________________________________________

Note – the Jews pretend they were victims of the very system they instituted and controlled:

At Putin's side, an army of Jewish billionaires. "We have to keep our Jewishness and be united in the Diaspora," says Russian Jewish Congress VP. "

http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-Features/At-Putins-side-an-army-of-Jewish-billionaires

When the air-conditioning broke down at the reception for the unveiling ceremony of the Red Army monument in Netanya on Monday, it didn't matter if you were a billionaire, multimillionaire or broke. Everyone suffered the same.

In one corner sat Mikhail Fridman, the seventh-richest man in Russia, whose fortune is estimated at $15 billion by Forbes. He stayed hydrated in the sweltering heat by sipping a glass of water. In another stood Moshe Kantor, the chemicals tycoon who Forbes said was worth $2.3b. He repeatedly removed the beads of sweat from his head with a napkin.

The two men were part of a group of two dozen or so affluent Russian-speaking businessmen who came to the ceremony where President Vladimir Putin was the guest of honor. Some, like Fridman, flew in especially from Russia. Others, like Kantor, drove from nearby Herzliya, where many businessman from the former Soviet Union including Leonid Nevzlin and Gabriel Mirilashvili, to name a few, have made their homes.

For many members of this class of ultra rich Putin's arrival in the country was an opportunity for them to brush shoulders with one another and to mingle with friends and officials from the motherland. The richest man in the room filled with rich men was probably the media-shy Fridman, who declined to speak to The Jerusalem Post. "I am a private person," he said, displaying seemingly good English.

Other faces were more familiar to locals. Lev Leviev, the diamonds and real estate mogul who is a bit of anomaly in this world, was on hand. Although born in Uzbekistan, then part of the Soviet Union, he immigrated to Israel as a teenager in the 1970s and made his money in the Jewish state. Only after the markets in the former Soviet Union opened did the Israeli, whose worth was estimated at about $1.7b. earlier this year, invest extensively in natural resources and property in that part of the world.

Not everybody in the room was a billionaire. Some were worth a mere couple of hundred of million dollars Alexander Levin, a Ukrainian businessman who was among those who donated to build the monument, is one of latter.

The real estate developer, who last year set up the World Forum for Russian Jewry, an advocacy group based in New York, explained why he it was an important cause.

"My two grandparents were killed during World War II so it's very important to us," he said. "We are paying just a little [in comparison to what they paid]."

How much is a little? Levin said the exact sum "was not important" but that it was "a lot of money."

Members of United Israel Appeal-Keren Hayesod, which raised the money to build the marble and concrete monument overlooking the azure Mediterranean Sea, were also tight-lipped.

"We organized a group of 10 to 15 top businessmen who raised the money that helped transform this dream to reality," said Gadi Dror, the UIA's director of the eastern region. "We do not go [into the] figures because they [the donors] prefer not to but it is meaningful amount."

A source later said each businessman had donated at least $100,000. Watching the group of mega-wealthy interact, one cannot help but wonder how so many affluent businessmen in the former Soviet Union are Jewish.

German Zakharyaev, vice president of the Russian Jewish Congress, cited two main reasons for that. First, Jews are few among many.

"We are a minority and as such we have to be strong [if we are] to preserve our customs," said the businessman who, as a member of the Mountain Jewish community of the eastern Caucuses, is a minority within a minority.

"This is something in our commandments that we have to keep our Jewishness and be united in the Diaspora." Second, he said, Jewish businessmen are hard workers. "We think a lot and we sleep a little," he said.

The China situation:

October 1 1949, Mao Tse Tsung declared the founding of the People's Republic of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing. He was funded by Rothschild created Communism in Russia and also the following Rothschild agents: Solomon Adler, a former United States Treasury official who was a Soviet Spy; Israel Epstein, the son of a Jewish Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar in Russia for trying to ferment a revolution there; and Frank Coe, a leading official of the Rothschild owned IMF. Mao would murder sixty million innocent Chinese people under his rule mainly to destroy traditional Chinese culture. As with Christianity, any practitioners of spiritual systems where outlawed, killed, and thrown into gulags, to die a slow death through slave labor, starvation and torture. The Communistic systems became the new culture of control. With China under their flag, Tibet was next on the list as being the last bastion of spiritual and historical knowledge. All the Jewish systems seek to remove spiritual knowledge from Gentiles and keep it in the hands of the Jewish elite. This is a major part of their indoctrination program. There has been a major Jewish population in China for over a thousand years such as the Jews of Kaifeng. Communism was imported into Manchuria by an Oriental Jew named Abrahams. The powerful Western Jews worked with their Asian counterparts to conqueror the East, just as they did with their Jewish Eastern European brethren.

China has been built up into the biggest global superpower by the Jews and everything has been shipped there. This was identical to what the Jews did with their USSR, turning it into a massive super state of military superpower, to wage conquest upon the rest of the earth, which they did. The only reason they were halted was the second war monkey wrenched their plans globally and led to the stagnation and fall of the USSR. There are reports that the America tactical silos are contracted to Israeli firms for certain electronics' functions. This same situation was a key factor in the London false flag attacks, 911, and Fukushima. They also have their agents all over the Pentagon and other key Western military and government networks. The West is past the demoralization point and has entered into the destabilization phase. The Protest Wall St was organized by Jewish agents of Rothschild to be the start of a Communist movement, which is part of the subversion of decades of indoctrination of students into Communist ideals. At this point, one way or another, they are seeking to take the West down should they start a full out Communist revolution, civil war or open war. One way or another, it seems Red Chinese troops will be on Western Soil "Liberating" us from the Fascist oppressors. This is what the Jews did in the ancient world with the Christian Crusades into Europe and around the world, and later with the Red Army rolling over Europe and the East, enslaving the many for the Jews.

If they wanted to take it to open war, it would be easy to pull the rug out from under NATO in Europe and America, and put the West under the Red banner. This is what America and Western Europe have been prepped for over the decades, and how they planned to take Germany down into Communism during the First war, which they manipulated into existence for the sole purpose of taking all of Europe down into Communism, and they nearly did. It is a repeating set of tactics they are using.

From looking at things, the ME conflict is a smaller warm up to a planned global conflict between China, North Korea and Russia and its allies. The Jews own these countries totally. Russia has just finished a mass joint war games exercise with China on Eastern European soil with thousands of Red Chinese troops. They where training specifically for war against Western forces. This was kept out of the mainstream it seems:

beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2013/09/russia-china-hold-large-scale-war-games-2449002.html?

Version: Mobile | Web
Created with Weebly